Abstract
The para-type sodium channel in insects is the primary target of pyrethroid and DDT insecticides. However, modifications in the target protein structure such as point mutations or substitutions, resulting from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), cause insensitivity of the insect’s nervous system to pyrethroids and DDT and, in turn, result in insecticide resistance. Among these mutations, substitution of leucine to phenylalanine (L to F) in the 6th segment of domain II (IIS6) has been clearly associated with pyrethroid and DDT resistance in many insect species, including mosquitoes. Here, multiple copies of the sodium channel gene were identified in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus by Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Two genomic DNA fragments of the mosquito sodium channel gene (509 bp and 181 bp) were detected by a single PCR primer pair. Sequence analysis indicated the lack of an intron sequence in the 181 bp sodium channel fragment. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis revealed a strong correlation among the frequencies of L-to-F allelic (T) expression at the RNA level, the frequencies and resistance allele (T) at the L-to-F site of the 509 bp genomic DNA fragment, which did include an intron sequence, and the levels of insecticide resistance. Taking together, this study, for the first time, not only revealed multiple copies of the sodium channel gene presented in the Culex mosquito genome but also suggested that the one with the intro sequence may be a functional copy of the sodium channel gene in the Culex mosquitoes. .
Keywords: Sodium channel, multiple copies, insecticide resistance, Culex quinquefasciatus
Introduction
Voltage-gated sodium channels are responsible for the depolarization phase of action potentials in membranes of neurons and in all types of excitable cells [1]. The para-type sodium channel in insects is the primary target of pyrethroid and DDT insecticides [2]. Pyrethroids and DDT deliver their toxic, insecticidal effects primarily by binding onto the sodium channel, altering its gating properties, and keeping the sodium channel open for unusually long times. This prolongs the flow of the sodium current, which in turn elevates and extends the depolarizing phase of the action potential of the neuron membrane and thus initiates repetitive discharges and prevents the repolarization phase of the action potentials [3]. However, modifications in the sodium channel structure such as point mutations or substitutions resulting from single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNP] can dramatically lower sensitivity to DDT and pyrethroids in the sodium channels of the insect’s nervous system by reducing or even eliminating the binding affinity of the insecticides to proteins [3], thus diminishing the toxic effects of the insecticides and conferring insecticide resistance [4,5]. Reduced target-site sensitivity of sodium channels is known to be one of the major mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance and is referred to as knockdown resistance (kdr) [6].
An increasing body of evidence from molecular and pharmacological studies has pointed to the involvement of point mutations in voltage-gated sodium channels in kdr and kdr-like resistance in many medically or agriculturally important pest species, including the mosquito [4,5,7–9]. Among these kdr mutations, substitution of leucine to phenylalanine [L to F], histidine [L to H], or serine [L to S] in the 6th segment of domain II (IIS6) resulting from a single nucleotide polymorphism, which in the case of mosquitoes is the change from codon TTA to TTT) has been clearly associated with resistance to pyrethroids and DDT. This L to F kdr mutation was first detected in pyrethroid-resistant house flies and cockroaches, but has now also been found in many other pyrethroid-resistant insect species, although other kdr mutations appear to be unique to specific species in many insect species [10–13]. Recently, our group investigated the frequency of alleles (A or T) at the L-to-F locus at genomic DNA and RNA levels within the same individuals of different mosquito strains of Culex quinquefasciatus bearing different resistant phenotypes [14,15]. In the earlier study we generated a 341 bp PCR fragment, where the L-to-F mutation resides, from the mosquito sodium channel genomic DNA but found no correlation between the L-to-F allele (T) at the genomic DNA level and the level of permethrin resistance. However, there was a strong correlation between the prevalence of the L-to-F allelic (T) expression at the RNA level and the level of resistance [15]. Interestingly, we detected no introns in this 341 bp sodium channel Genomic DNA region, in contrast to previous reports [16]. We therefore proposed that multiple copies of the sodium channel gene may be present in the genome of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Building on our previous research, the current study was designed to characterize the genomic organization and allelic expression at the L-to-F site of the sodium channel gene in Cx. quinquefasciatus.
Materials and Methods
Mosquitoes
Five strains of Cx. quinquifascaitus were used in this study: 2 field collected strains HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0 from Madison County and Mobile County, Alabama, respectively [17]; two permethrin selected resistant strains HAmCqG8 and MAmCqG6, which were the 8th and the 6th generation permethrin-selected offspring of HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0, respectively [15,18]; and a susceptible strain S-Lab, provided by Dr. Laura Harrington (Cornell University).
Southern blot analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from the mosquitoes as described by Xu et al. [14]. Genomic DNA (40 μg) was digested completely with 260 units EcoRI or HindIII in a 170 μl solution. Samples were precipitated with ethanol and then re-suspended in TE buffer prior to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gels in 0.5× TBE, after which they were transferred to Nytran membranes (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH, USA). To optimize the detection of a single band rather than multiple bands per sodium channel gene, the probe design met the following 2 criteria: (1) lack of internal EcoRI and HindIII restriction cutting sites and (2) inclusion within a single exon. The mosquito para type sodium channel cDNA fragments were amplified using a primer pair: KDR S1S (5′ GACAACGTGGACCGCTTCCCGGACA 3′)/KDR AS1S (5′ ACGACAAAAT TTCCTATCACTACGGTG 3′). The cDNA fragment was labeled with [α-32P] dCTP using a High Prime Labeling Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and hybridized with blots using QuickHyb solution (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Amplification of para-type sodium channel gene fragments from genomic DNA and RNA of Culex mosquitoes
Males and females of each mosquito population had their genomic DNA and RNA extracted for each experiment. Three replications were performed, each on a different day, for a total of 50 individual mosquitoes from each population. The sodium channel cDNA fragments were amplified by a primer pair KDR S#8 (5’-ATTTCATCATCGTGGCCCTTTCGC-3’) and KDR AS#1 (5’-TTGTTCGTTTCGTTGTCGGCTGTG-3’), which generated amplicons that spanned the intron/exon boundaries but did not amplify genomic DNA. This approach eliminated any influence due to genomic DNA contamination. The sodium channel genomic DNA fragments were amplified using a primer pair KDR S14 (5′ GGAACTTCACCGACTTCATGCACTC 3′) and KDR AS1 (5′ GACAAAAGCAAGGCTAAGAAAAGG 3′). The primers were designed based on exonic sequences that would not generate products in RNA samples without a reverse transcription step.
SNP determination for the kdr allele in Culex mosquitoes
The frequency and heterozygosity of the kdr allele in mosquitoes were investigated further by SNP determination using an ABI Prism SNaPshot Multiplex Kit and analyzed on the ABI Prism® 3100 Genetic Analyzer using Genemapper software according to the manufacturer’s instructions (A&B Applied Biosystems) [15,19]. The primer Cx_SNP2 (5′ GCCACCGTAGTGATAGGAAATTT 3′) used for SNP determination was designed according to the sequence immediately upstream of the kdr allele. Three replications of the SNP determination were carried out with different preparations of the PCR templates. To confirm whether the PCR products used for the SNP determination were in fact the para-type sodium channel gene fragments, PCR products from both the cDNA and genomic DNA of each individual were sequenced at least once each.
Results
Identification of multiple sodium channel genes in the genome of Culex mosquitoes
To examine the number of copies of the para-type sodium channel gene in the genome of Culex mosquitoes, genomic DNA isolated from S-Lab and HAmCqG8 was subjected to Southern blot analysis with the sodium channel cDNA probe generated according to a single exon sequence (exon 20, according to Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. [20]) of mosquito sodium channel gene using a primer pair: KDR S1S /KDR AS1S. Two genomic DNA bands with molecular sizes of approximately 4 and 2 kb were detected in pyrethroid resistant HAmCqG8 mosquitoes when mosquito genomic DNAs were digested with either EcoR I or Hind III (Fig. 1). Digestion of genomic DNA of S-Lab with either EcoR I or Hind III resulted in 3 genomic DNA bands with approximately molecular sizes of ~5, 2, and 1.5 kb or ~4, 2.5, and 2 kb, respectively (Fig. 1). The different numbers and sizes of genomic DNA molecules detected in HAmCqG8 and S-Lab may be due to polymorphisms at the restriction enzyme cutting site(s) between these two strains. These results, reported here for the first time, strongly suggest that multiple, or at least two, sodium channel genes are present in the genome of the mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus.
Figure 1.

Southern blot analysis of the sodium channel gene in the genome of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Genomic DNAs (40 μg each) from HAmCqG8 and S-Lab mosquitoes were digested with EcoRI and HindIII. The membranes were hybridized with 32P-labelled mosquito sodium channel gene fragment generated from a single exon (exon 20).
Sequencing Analysis of Multiple Sodium Channel Genes in Mosquitoes
Two genomic DNA products (509 bp and 181 bp) were generated by PCR from all 50 individuals in each of the five mosquito strains tested, ranging from susceptible (S-Lab) through intermediate (HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0) to highly resistant (HAmCqG8 and MAmCqG6), when only a single primer pair, KDR S14/KDR AS1, was used. The PCR products of both 509 bp and 181 bp from 5 individual samples of each strain were then sequenced and an analysis of the results indicated that the 509 bp PCR product of the sodium channel gDNA was indeed the mosquito sodium channel gene sequence, with an intron sequence near the L-to-F site (Fig. 2) as previously reported in mosquitoes [16]. The 181 bp PCR product did not include the intron sequence (Fig. 3), which was consistent with the previous report by Xu et al. [14,15]. This discovery provided not only strong support for our Southern blot analyses, which indicated that there were at least two copies of the sodium channel gene present in the genome of the mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus, but also suggested an explanation for the controversial results reported by Martinez-Torres et al. [16] and Xu et al. [14,15], namely that each of the studies identified only one of the two copies of the sodium channel gene - one with an intron near the L-to-F site [16] and the other without the intron [14,15].
Figure 2.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of para-type sodium channel gene fragments from genomic DNA of Culex mosquitoes. Sodium channel genomic DNA fragments were amplified from individual mosquitoes using a single primer pair KDR S14/KDR AS1. The primers were designed based on exonic sequences that would not generate products in RNA samples without a reverse transcription step.
Figure 3.

Sequence analyses of 509 bp and 181 bp sodium channel fragments. A. Sequence alignment of 509 bp and 181 bp sodium channel fragments. The primers used for amplification of sodium channel genomic DNA fragments were underlined and the primer used for SNP determination was in bold and italic. The nucleotides in the L-to-F Kdr locus are underlined. B. Diagrammatic representation of genotype organization of the 509 bp and 181 bp sodium channel fragments. The 181 bp sodium channel fragment skimmed an intron sequence located between two exons (exon 20 and 21, according to Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. [20]), which was not the case for the 509 bp fragment.
Comparison of L-to-F kdr allelic variation at the genomic DNA and RNA levels of Culex mosquitoes
The frequency of alleles (A or T) at the L-to-F kdr locus at genomic DNA (i.e., two DNA fragments) and RNA levels was investigated in 50 individuals from each of the HAmCqG8, MAmCqG6, HAmCqG0, MAmCqG0 and S-Lab strains. We first assessed the RNA expression variation of the A or T alleles at the L-to-F kdr locus. A strong correlation between the prevalence of the L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level and the level of susceptibility or resistance to permethrin was identified in all 5 mosquito strains. All 50 individuals in the susceptible S-Lab strain expressed susceptible allele A at the L-to-F kdr locus of the sodium channel gene at the RNA level, resulting in a codon TTA encoding Leu corresponding to the susceptibility in this strain to permethrin. In contrast, in the highly resistant Culex strains of HAmCqG8 and MAmCqG6 with multiple generations of permethrin selection in the laboratory after collection from the field, 84 and 100% of the individuals, respectively, showed monoallelic expression of the T allele resulting in a change from Leu to Phe (Table 1), which strongly correlated with the high level of resistance in these two populations. Furthermore, there was a clear pattern of allelic variation in individuals of the two field collected parental strains HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0 (Table 1), with frequencies ranging from 0.02 and 0.04, respectively, for individuals that expressed only the susceptible allele A, through 0.48 and 0.38 for those that expressed both alleles, and 0.50 and 0.58 for those that expressed the kdr T allele. The allelic variation pattern for the L-to-F kdr locus in these two field collected mosquito populations strongly correlated with their intermediate levels of resistance [17], which agrees with the findings of the previous study by Xu et al. [15].
Table 1.
A comparison of the frequency of alleles (A or T) at the L-to-F kdr site for genomic DNA (two DNA fragments) and RNA levels of Cx. quinquefasciatus
| Strain | Nb | Phenotype | Template source | Individual allelec (frequency)
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTA | TTA/T | TTT | ||||
| S-Lab | 54 | Susceptible | gDNA w/o intron | 4 (0.07) | 43 (0.8) | 7 (0.13) |
| gDNA w/ intron | 54 (1.0) | 0 | 0 | |||
| cDNA | 54 (1.0) | 0 | 0 | |||
|
| ||||||
| HAmCqG0a | 54 | 100-fold resistance | gDNA w/o intron | 1 (0.02) | 26 (0.48) | 27 (0.5) |
| gDNA w/ intron | 15 (0.28) | 26 (0.48) | 13 (0.24) | |||
| cDNA | 14 (0.26) | 25 (0.46) | 15 (0.28) | |||
|
| ||||||
| HAmCqG8 | 50 | 3,100-fold resistance | gDNA w/o intron | 0 | 28 (0.56) | 22 (0.44) |
| gDNA w/ intron | 0 | 8 (0.16) | 42 (0.84) | |||
| cDNA | 0 | 2 (0.04) | 48 (0.96) | |||
|
| ||||||
| MAmCqG0a | 24 | 40-fold resistance | gDNA w/o intron | 1 (0.04) | 9 (0.38) | 14 (0.58) |
| gDNA w/ intron | 10 (0.42) | 10 (0.42) | 4 (0.16) | |||
| cDNA | 10 (0.42) | 10 (0.42) | 4 (0.16) | |||
|
| ||||||
| MAmCqG6 | 24 | 583-fold resistance | gDNA w/o intron | 1 (0.04) | 4 (0.17) | 19 (0.79) |
| gDNA w/ intron | 0 | 0 | 24 (1.0) | |||
| cDNA | 0 | 0 | 24 (1.0) | |||
G0:The parental insects were collected directly from the field and the numeral indicates the generation (s) of selection with permethrin
The total number of tested mosquitoes
The nucleotides in the L-to-F kdr locus that changed in the genotypes are underlined
We next compared the frequency of alleles (A or T) at the L-to-F kdr site at the genomic DNA level of both 181 and 509 bp gDNA fragments in all five mosquito populations. Different genotypes for the L-to-F kdr site were exhibited among individuals in the same population for all 5 of the mosquito populations, including individuals that were heterozygous for both susceptible (A) and resistance (T) alleles or homozygous for either the A or T allele, which is consistent with the results of the earlier study [15]. No correlation was found between the frequency of L-to-F allelic variation at the L-to-F site of the 181 bp sodium channel DNA fragment, the prevalence of the L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level and the level of permethrin resistance in the 5 mosquito populations (Table 1), which is also consistent with the findings reported by Xu et al. [15].
In contrast, there was a strong correlation between the frequency of allelic variation at the L-to-F site of the 509 bp genomic DNA fragment (with the intron), the prevalence of L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level and the level of permethrin resistance in all five mosquito populations. In the S-Lab strain, all the individuals were genotype homozygous for the susceptible A allele at the L-to-F site, which corresponded to their L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level; all the individuals expressed the susceptible allele A (Table 1), commensurate with their level of susceptibility to permethrin. In the highly resistant HAmCqG8 and MAmCqG6 populations, 84% and 100%, respectively, of the individual mosquitoes were genotype homozygous for the resistance T allele at the L-to-F site, which was strongly correlated with the frequency of their L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level (Table 1) and their levels of resistance to permethrin. The intermediate susceptibility populations, HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0, had individuals that were homozygous for the susceptible A allele (28 and 42%, respectively), heterozygous for both (A/T) alleles (48 and 42%), and homozygous for resistance (T) alleles (24 and 16%) (Table 1), which, again, strongly correlated with the frequency of their L-to-F allelic expression at the RNA level and their intermediate level of resistance. The data from the field parental mosquitoes HAmCqG0 and MAmCqG0 thus clearly represent a transitional status between susceptible and highly resistant through their intermediate genotype (509 bp DNA fragment) and expression condition for the L-to-F kdr locus, which closely corresponded to their relatively low levels of resistance.
Discussion
Voltage-gated sodium channels belong to a superfamily of ion channels that play an important function in membrane excitability [23] and are responsible for the depolarization phase of action potentials in membranes of neurons and in all types of excitable cells. Molecular characterization has revealed that 9 voltage-gated sodium channel genes and 1 related sodium channel gene are present in the mammalian sodium channel gene family [21–23]; 8 sodium channel genes have been documented in zebra fish [24]; and 6 sodium channel genes have been cloned from electric fish [25]. Multiple sodium channel genes have also been characterized in some invertebrate species; for example, Hirudo medicinalis (leech) and Holocynthia roretzi (ascidia) have 4 and 2 characterized sodium channel genes, respectively [26–28]. Compared to the fairly well defined multiple vertebrate sodium channel genes, it appears only one sodium channel gene, homologous to para (currently DmNaV) of Drosophila melanogaster, that has been well characterized in insects [29] encodes the equivalent of the α-subunit of the mammalian sodium channels. A putative sodium channel gene, DSC1, has been described in D. melanogaster [30] and homologous genes were later found in other insect species. A more recent study by Moignot et al. [31] revealed two sodium channel cDNAs, a para-like sodium channel and a novel sodium channel that is evolutionarily closely related to the para-type sodium channel, present in the cockroach Periplaneta Americana. This suggests a possibility that insects may also have multiple sodium channels in their genomes.
The current study has, for the first time, revealed multiple (at least two) para-type sodium channel genes in the genome of the mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus. Comparison of L-to-F kdr genotypes in two para-type sodium channel genes (509 bp and 181 bp PCR fragments) in 5 mosquito strains with their corresponding transcriptional expression and their levels of resistance revealed a strong correlation between the frequency of the resistant allele (T genotype at the L-to-F site of the 509 bp DNA fragment [with an intron sequence]), the frequency of L-to-F allelic (T) expression at the RNA level, and the levels of resistance. Nevertheless, no-correlation among genotype, transcriptional expression, and resistance phenotype was identified for the 181 bp sodium channel DNA fragment lacking the intron sequence. Yet, with the first glance, the These results strongly suggest that the sodium channel gene that includes the intron sequence might be a functional copy of the sodium channel gene for transcription and the translation of the sodium channel gene and protein in mosquitoes, and is thus involved in the insecticide resistance of the mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus.
Recent studies have suggested that pseudogenes are present in the genome, accompanied by a loss of function [32]. Pseudogenes can be generated by either direct DNA duplication or retrotransposition. A pseudogene resulting from the latter pathway is referred to as a processed pseudogene (or retro-pseudogene). Processed pseudogenes arise from reverse-transcription of mRNA and re-integration into the genome. In the human genome, it has been proposed that processed pseudogenes are generated from reverse transcribing spliced mRNAs into cDNAs using the reverse transcriptase from the long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) followed by re-integration into the human genome [33,34]. About 8000 processed pseudogenes have been reported in the human genome through exhaustive sequence comparisons with known human proteins [34]. The characteristics of processed pseudogenes include the absence of introns, the presence of flanking direct repeats, and a 3’-polyadenylation tract [32]. Thus, whether the non-intron para-type sodium channel gene identified in the current study is a pseudogene or a functional gene with a post transcriptional regulation [15] remains a subject for further investigation.
Research Highlights.
Our study is the first report of multiple para-type sodium channel genes in the mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus. Only the L-to-F kdr genotypes in the para-type sodium channel gene with the intron sequence were consistent with the expression of their transcripts and levels of resistance. This research highlights the complexity of sodium channel gene expression and its role in the pyrethroid resistance of insects and provides a new framework with which to study the role of sodium channels, channel gene expression regulation, and their importance in the insecticide resistance of insects.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Laura Harrington (Cornell University) for providing the SLab strain. We also thank Jan Szechi for editorial assistance. This study was supported by an NIH grant (RAI090303A) to N.L. and K.D., AAES Hatch/Multistate Grants ALA08-045 to N.L., and ALA015-1-10026 to N.L.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG. International Union of Pharmacology, XLVII. Nomenclature and structure–function relationships of voltagegated sodium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57:397–409. doi: 10.1124/pr.57.4.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Narahashi T. Neuronal ion channels as the target sites of insecticides. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;7:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1996.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Narahashi T. Role of various ion channels in insecticide action. Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc. 1988;196:26-AGRO. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soderlund DM. Sodium channels. In: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill SS, editors. Comprehensive molecular insect science. Vol. 5. Elsevier Pergamon; New York: 2005. pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dong K. Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance. Invert Neurosci. 2007;7:17–30. doi: 10.1007/s10158-006-0036-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soderlund DM, Knipple DC. The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33:563–577. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(03)00023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Williamson MS, Martinez-Torres D, Hick CA, et al. Identification of mutations in the house fly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252:51–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02173204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: development and mechanisms. In: Liu N, editor. Recent advances in insect physiology, toxicology and molecular biology. Research Signpost; Kerala: 2008. pp. 75–91. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Srisawat R, Komalamisra N, Eshita Y, et al. Point mutations in domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in deltamethrin-resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Appl Entomol Zool. 2010;45:275–282. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Knipple DC, Doyle KE, Marsella-Herrick PA, et al. Tight genetic linkage between the kdr insecticide resistance trait and a voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene in the house fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:2483–2487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong K. A single amino acid change in the para sodium channel protein is associated with knockdown-resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides in German cockroach. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27:93–100. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(96)00082-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ingles PJ, Adams PM, Knipple DC, et al. Characterization of voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene coding sequences from insecticides- susceptible and knockdown-resistant house fly strains. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;26:319–326. doi: 10.1016/0965-1748(95)00093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu N, Xu Q, Li T, et al. Permethrin resistance and target site insensitivity in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus in Alabama, USA. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:1424–1429. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xu Q, Liu H, Zhang L, et al. Resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, and possible mechanisms for resistance. Pest Manag Sci. 2005;61:1096–1102. doi: 10.1002/ps.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu Q, Wang H, Zhang L, et al. Kdr allelic variation in pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus (S) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;345:774–780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s s. Inscet Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu H, Cupp EW, Micher KM, et al. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in Alabama and Florida strains of Culex quinquefaciatus. J Med Entoml. 2004;41:408–413. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-41.3.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li T, Liu N. Genetics and inheritance of permethrin resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:1127–1134. doi: 10.1603/me10142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Q, Wang H, Zhang L, et al. Sodium channel gene expression associated with pyrethroid resistant house flies and German cockroaches. Gene. 2006;379:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saavedra-Rodriguez K, Urdaneta-Marquez L, Rajatileka S, et al. A mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene associated with pyrethroid resistance in Latin American Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2007;16:785–798. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Catterall WA. From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: the structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 2000;26:13–25. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goldin AL. Evolution of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. J Exp Biol. 2002;205:575–584. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.5.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu FH, Catterall WA. Overview of the voltage-gated sodium channel family. Genome Biol. 2003;4:207. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Novak AE, Jost MC, Lu Y, et al. Gene duplications and evolution of vertebrate voltage-gated sodium channels. J Mol Evol. 2006;63:208–221. doi: 10.1007/s00239-005-0287-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lopreato GF, Lu Y, Southwell A, et al. Evolution and divergence of sodium channel genes in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7588–7592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131171798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blackshaw SE, Henderson LP, Malek J, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals cell-specific patterns of expression of a family of putative voltage-gated sodium channel genes in the leech. J Neurobiol. 2003;55:355–371. doi: 10.1002/neu.10214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nagahora H, Okada T, Yahagi N, et al. Diversity of voltage-gated sodium channels in the ascidian larval nervous system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;275:558–564. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Okamura Y, Ono F, Okagaki R, et al. Neural expression of a sodium channel gene requires cell-specific interactions. Neuron. 1994;13:937–948. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90259-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shao YM, Dong K, Tang ZH, et al. Molecular characterization of a sodium channel gene from the Silkworm Bombyx mori, Insect Biochem. Mol Biol. 2009;39:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Salkoff L, Butler A, Wei A, et al. Genomic organization and deduced amino acid sequence of a putative sodium channel gene in Drosophila. Science. 1987;237:744–749. doi: 10.1126/science.2441469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moignot B, Lemaire C, Quinchard S, et al. The discovery of a novel sodium channel in the cockroach Periplaneta americana: Evidence for an early duplication of the para-like gene. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;39:814–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Harrison PM, Gerstein M. Studying genomes through the aeons: protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution. J Mol Biol. 2002;318:1155–1174. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00109-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Esnault C, Maestre J, Heidmann T. Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes. Nature Genet. 2000;24:363–367. doi: 10.1038/74184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weiner AM. Do all SINEs lead to LINEs? Nature Genet. 2000;24:332–333. doi: 10.1038/74135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
