Abstract
Potassium thiocyanate acts as an efficient sulfur surrogate in C–S cross-coupling reactions mediated by recyclable copper oxide nanoparticles under ligand free conditions. This protocol avoids foul smelling thiols, for the synthesis of a variety of symmetrical diaryl sulfides, via the cross-coupling of different aryl halides with potassium thiocyanate, affording corresponding products in moderate to excellent yields.
Keywords: aryl halides, aryl sulfides, copper oxide, cross-coupling, ligand free, potassium thiocyanate, recyclable
Introduction
After the discovery of copper-promoted Ullmann reaction [1–3] for the construction of carbon-hetero atom bonds, several protocols have been reported over the years to establish C–N, C–O, and C–S linkages. Carbon–sulfur bonds are widespread, occurring in numerous pharmaceutically and biologically active compounds [4–8]. A large variety of aryl sulfides are in use for diverse clinical applications in the treatment of cancer [9], HIV [10–11], Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [12].
During the last decades, transition and boron group metals, such as palladium [13–18], nickel [19–20], copper [21–37], iron [38], indium [39–40], lanthanum [41] and cobalt [42] have been used in cross-coupling reactions, developed for the formation of carbon–sulfur bonds. Most of these coupling protocols involve the reaction between thiols and aryl halides, resulting in the formation of C–S bonds. Most of these metal-catalyzed reactions involve volatile and foul-smelling thiols as the main drawback, which leads to environmental and safety problems. To overcome these problems, Zhou [43] and coworkers recently reported an efficient C–S bond formation by the reaction of potassium thiocyanate and aryl halides in the presence of a copper catalyst and a ligand in aqueous medium at 130 °C for 48 h. Tao et al. described the synthesis of diaryl sulfides catalyzed by CuI via cross-coupling between aryl halides and thioacetamide using Cs2CO3 as the base and DMSO–H2O as the solvent at 120 °C [44].
These recently developed protocols involve expensive catalytic systems and ligands [43], long reaction times [43–44], metal contamination of the final product, and non recyclability of the catalyst. This leads to increased costs as well as limiting the scope of the reaction. From the synthetic point of view, it is desirable to find novel recyclable catalytic systems, especially under ligand-free conditions, for the synthesis of such highly useful organic compounds.
In the past few years, considerable efforts have been made in the area of heterogeneous catalysis for various organic transformations. In general, heterogeneous catalysts offer higher surface area and lower coordinating sites, which are responsible for their higher catalytic activity [45–47]. Furthermore, heterogeneous catalysis has the advantage of high atom efficiency, easy product purification, and reusability of the catalyst. However, up until now, the investigation of nanoparticles as catalysts has been limited and will be widely studied in future.
Results and Discussion
In continuation of our investigations on metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, we have explored the CuO-catalyzed synthesis of diaryl sulfides under ligand-free conditions (Scheme 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first recyclable copper oxide nanoparticle-catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl halides with potassium thiocyanate [46–51].
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of symmetrical aryl sulfides catalyzed by copper oxide nanoparticles.
Initially, the reaction between potassium thiocyanate and iodobenzene was selected as the model reaction for optimizing the reaction conditions involving various copper sources, bases, solvents, and temperature (Table 1).
Table 1.
Screening of copper sources for the cross-coupling reaction between iodo benzene and potassium thiocyanate.a
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Base | T (°) | Yield (%)b |
1 | CuO | DMSO | K2CO3 | rt | 0 |
2 | CuO | DMSO | K2CO3 | 80 | 46 |
3 | CuO | DMSO | K2CO3 | 130 | 51 |
4 | CuO | DMSO | Cs2CO3 | 130 | 79 |
5 | CuO | DMSO | KOH | 130 | 94 |
6 | CuO | DMSO | K3PO4 | 130 | 42 |
7 | CuO | Toluene | KOH | 130 | trace |
8 | CuO | H2O | KOH | 130 | trace |
9 | CuO | PEG | KOH | 130 | 60 |
10 | CuO | DMF | KOH | 130 | 70 |
11 | – | DMSO | KOH | 130 | 0c |
12 | CuO | DMSO | – | 130 | 0d |
13 | CuCl2·2H2O | DMSO | KOH | 130 | 83 |
14 | CuSO4·5H2O | DMSO | KOH | 130 | 71 |
15 | Cu(OAc)·H2O | DMSO | KOH | 130 | 79 |
aReaction conditions: Iodobenzene (2.0 mmol), potassium thiocyanate (1.5 mmol), nano CuO (5.0 mol %), solvent (2.0 mL), base (2.0 equiv), 130 °C, 20 h. bIsolated yield. cIn the absence of catalyst. dIn the absence of base.
First, several copper catalysts were screened (Table 1), and CuO was found to be promising for this tandem reaction (Table 1, entry 5). Amongst various bases screened, Cs2CO3 and KOH afforded the symmetrical aryl sulfides in excellent yields (Table 1, entries 4, 5). Other bases such as K2CO3 and K3PO4 gave lesser amounts of the desired product (Table 1, entries 3, 6). Among the solvents, DMSO yielded the best results (Table 1, entry 5) whereas PEG and DMF gave the products in moderate yields (Table 1, entries 9 and 10), whilst solvents such as toluene and water were ineffective (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). The coupling reaction did not occur in the absence of the catalyst (Table 1, entry 11) or base (Table 1, entry 12). When the reaction was conducted either at room temperature and 80 °C, no product was obtained or the yield was very low (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). The ideal temperature for the reaction was found to be 130 °C.
A study was conducted on C–S cross-coupling reaction using various sulfur sources under these conditions (Table 2). Among these sulfur surrogates potassium thiocyanate gave good yields in this C–S cross-coupling reaction.
Table 2.
Nano CuO catalyzed C–S cross-coupling of iodobenzene with different sulfur sources.a
Entry | Aryl halide | Sulfur source | Yield (%)b |
1 | ![]() |
KSCN | 94 |
2 | NH4SCN | 91 | |
3 | Na2S2O3 | 59 | |
4 | ![]() |
KSCN | 91 |
5 | NH4SCN | 85 | |
6 | Na2S2O3 | 54 | |
7 | ![]() |
KSCN | 92 |
8 | NH4SCN | 81 | |
9 | Na2S2O3 | 58 |
aReaction conditions: Aryl halides (2.0 mmol), sulfur sources (1.5 mmol), nano CuO (5.0 mol %), DMSO (2.0 mL), KOH (2.0 equiv), 130 °C, 20 h, bIsolated yield.
While expanding the scope of this nano CuO catalyzed tandem cross-coupling, the reaction of potassium thiocyanate with various aryl halides was examined under the optimized conditions. In general, all the reactions were very clean, and the symmetrical aryl sulfides were obtained in moderate to good yields. This protocol efficiently coupled iodobenzenes with electron donating groups (e.g., Me, OMe and Et) with potassium thiocyanate to produce the corresponding products in excellent yields (Table 3, entries 4, 6 and 8), whereas in the presence of an electron withdrawing group (CF3, NO2) a slight decrease in the yield of the diaryl sulfide (Table 3, entries 12 and 13) was observed. Under these reaction conditions, various hetero aromatic iodides were reacted with potassium thiocyanate and gave the corresponding diaryl sulfides in appreciable yields (Table 3, entries 15, 16 and 17). In case of the reactions of aromatic and hetero aromatic bromides with potassium thiocyanate, longer reaction times were required in order to obtain reasonable yields of diaryl sulfides (Table 3, entry 2, 5, 7 and 18). Iodobenzene was found to be a more reactive substrate than bromo, and chloro benzenes (Table 3, entries 1, 2 and 3).
Table 3.
Copper oxide nanoparticles catalyzed synthesis of diaryl sulfidesa.
![]() | |||
Entry | Aryl halide | Product | Yield (%)b |
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
94 |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
63c |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
trace |
4 | ![]() |
![]() |
91 |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
68c |
6 | ![]() |
![]() |
92 |
7 | ![]() |
![]() |
70c |
8 | ![]() |
![]() |
87 |
9 | ![]() |
![]() |
72 |
10 | ![]() |
![]() |
78 |
11 | ![]() |
![]() |
76 |
12 | ![]() |
![]() |
79 |
13 | ![]() |
![]() |
78 |
14 | ![]() |
![]() |
75 |
15 | ![]() |
![]() |
66 |
16 | ![]() |
![]() |
62 |
17 | ![]() |
![]() |
69 |
18 | ![]() |
![]() |
72c |
aReaction conditions: Aryl halides (2.0 mmol), potassium thiocyanate (1.5 mmol), nano CuO (5.0 mol %), DMSO (2.0 mL), KOH (2.0 equiv), 130 °C, 20 h. b Isolated yield. cAfter 34 h.
Conclusion
We have developed a CuO nanoparticles catalyzed synthesis of symmetrical diaryl sulfides via cascade reaction of aryl halides with potassium thiocyanate under ligand free conditions. The reaction avoids foul smelling thiols and the catalyst is economical, air stable, functions under ligand free conditions and is recyclable for up to four cycles without loss of catalytic activity [20,39–41] (Table 4).
Table 4.
Copper oxide reusability of the catalyst.
Recylces | Yield (%) | Catalyst recovery (%) |
Native | 94 | 93 |
1 | 92 | 91 |
2 | 89 | 88 |
3 | 86 | 85 |
Experimental
General procedure for the synthesis of diaryl sulfides: A mixture of aryl iodide (2.0 mmol), potassium thiocyanate (1.5 mmol), nano CuO (5.0 mol %), and KOH (2.0 equiv) was stirred at 130 °C under a N2 atmosphere in DMSO (2.0 mL). The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. When the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool, a 1:1 mixture ethyl acetate and water (20 mL) was added and the CuO was removed by centrifugation. The organic layer was washed successively with brine and water, and dried with Na2SO4. The solvent and volatiles were completely removed under vacuum to give the crude product, which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to yield the analytically pure product in up to 94% yield. The identity and purity of the product was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
Supporting Information
Experimental details and spectroscopic data for new compounds.
Acknowledgments
KHVR and VPR thank CSIR, New Delhi, for the award of fellowship.
Contributor Information
K Harsha Vardhan Reddy, Email: Prakashorg1@gmail.com.
V Prakash Reddy, Email: Prakashorg1@gmail.com.
A Ashwan Kumar, Email: ashwankumar.10@gmail.com.
G Kranthi, Email: kranthimpharm@gmail.com.
YVD Nageswar, Email: dryvdnageswar@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Ullmann F. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1903;36:2382. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lindley J. Tetrahedron. 1984;40:1433. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)91791-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hassan J, Sévignon M, Gozzi C, Schulz E, Lemaire M. Chem Rev. 2002;102:1359. doi: 10.1021/cr000664r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johannesson P, Lindeberg G, Johansson A, Nikiforovich G V, Gogoll A, Synnergren B, Le Grèves M, Nyberg F, Karlén A, Hallberg A. J Med Chem. 2002;45:1767. doi: 10.1021/jm011063a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mugesh G, Du Mont W-W, Sies H. Chem Rev. 2001;101:2125. doi: 10.1021/cr000426w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morimoto K, Tsuji K, Iio T, Miyata N, Uchida A, Osawa R, Kitsutaka H, Takahashi A. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:703. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.4.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sader H S, Johnson D M, Jones R N. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:53. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.53-62.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ceruti M, Balliano G, Rocco F, Milla P, Arpicco S, Cattel L, Viola F. Lipids. 2001;36:629. doi: 10.1007/s11745-001-0767-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kaldor S W, Kalish V J, Davies J F, II, Shetty B V, Fritz J E, Appelt K, Burgess J A, Campanale K M, Chirgadze N Y, Clawson D K, et al. J Med Chem. 1997;40:3979. doi: 10.1021/jm9704098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsutsui H, Hayashi Y, Narasaka K. Chem Lett. 1997;26(4):317. doi: 10.1246/cl.1997.317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uchiyama K, Yoshida M, Hayashi Y, Narasaka K. Chem Lett. 1998;27(7):607. doi: 10.1246/cl.1998.607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Martino G, Edler M C, La Regina G, Coluccia A, Barbera M C, Barrow D, Nicholson R I, Chiosis G, Brancale A, Hamel E, et al. J Med Chem. 2006;49:947. doi: 10.1021/jm050809s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murata M, Buchwald S L. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:7397. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.05.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mispelaere-Canivet C, Spindler J-F, Perrio S, Beslin P. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:5253. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.03.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Itoh T, Mase T. Org Lett. 2004;6:4587. doi: 10.1021/ol047996t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fernández-Rodríguez M A, Shen Q, Hartwig J F. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2180. doi: 10.1021/ja0580340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee J-Y, Lee P H. J Org Chem. 2008;73:7413. doi: 10.1021/jo801169h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiang Z, She J, Lina X. Adv Synth Catal. 2009;351:2558. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200900501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Taniguchi N. J Org Chem. 2004;69:6904. doi: 10.1021/jo040184q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jammi S, Barua P, Rout L, Saha P, Punniyamurthy T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:1484. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.12.118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kwong F Y, Buchwald S L. Org Lett. 2002;4:3517. doi: 10.1021/ol0266673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen Y-J, Chen H-H. Org Lett. 2006;8:5609. doi: 10.1021/ol062339h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taniguchi N. J Org Chem. 2007;72:1241. doi: 10.1021/jo062131+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sperotto E, Van Klink G P M, De Vries J G, Van Koten G. J Org Chem. 2008;73:5625. doi: 10.1021/jo800491k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rout L, Saha P, Jammi S, Punniyamurthy T. Eur J Org Chem. 2008:640. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200700978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Herrero M T, SanMartin R, Domínguez E. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:1500. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Prasad D J C, Naidu A B, Sekar G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:1411. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang H, Jiang L, Chen T, Li Y. Eur J Org Chem. 2010;12:2324. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201000003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.She J, Jiang Z, Wang Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:593. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.11.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Basu B, Mandal B, Das S, Kundu S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:5523. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.07.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feng Y, Wang H, Sun F, Li Y, Fu X, Jin K. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:9737. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2009.09.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jogdand N R, Shingate B B, Shingare M S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:6092. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.08.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feng Y-S, Li Y-Y, Tang L, Wu W, Xu. H-J. 2010;51:2489. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.02.155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen C-K, Chen Y-W, Lin C-H, Lin H-P, Lee C-F. Chem Commun. 2010;46:282. doi: 10.1039/b918117b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jammi S, Sakthivel S, Rout L, Mukherjee T, Mandal S, Mitra R, Saha P, Punniyamurthy T. J Org Chem. 2009;74:1971. doi: 10.1021/jo8024253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reddy K H V, Reddy V P, Shankar J, Madhav B, Kumar B S P A, Nageswar Y V D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:2679. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.03.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Firouzabadi H, Iranpoor N, Gholinejad M. Adv Synth Catal. 2010;352:119–124. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200900671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Correa A, Carril M, Bolm C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:2880. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Reddy V P, Swapna K, Kumar A V, Rao K R. J Org Chem. 2009;74:3189. doi: 10.1021/jo802731j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reddy V P, Kumar A V, Swapna K, Rao K R. Org Lett. 2009;11:1697. doi: 10.1021/ol900009a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Murthy S N, Madhav B, Reddy V P, Nageswar Y V D. Eur J Org Chem. 2009;34:5902. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200900989. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wong Y-C, Jayanth T T, Cheng C-H. Org Lett. 2006;8:5613. doi: 10.1021/ol062344l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ke F, Qu Y, Jiang Z, Li Z, Wu D, Zhou X. Org Lett. 2011;13:454. doi: 10.1021/ol102784c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tao C, Lv A, Zhao N, Yang S, Liu X, Zhou J, Liu W, Zhao J. Synlett. 2011;1:134. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1259079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pacchioni G. Surf Rev Lett. 2000;7:277. doi: 10.1142/S0218625X00000336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Knight W D, Clemenger K, De Heer W A, Saunders W A, Chou M Y, Cohen M L. Phys Rev Lett. 1984;52:2141. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kaldor A, Cox D, Zakin M R. Molecular Surface Chemistry: Reactions of Gas-Phase Metal Clusters. In: Prigogine I, Rice S A, editors. Adv. Chem. Phys. Vol. 70. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1988. p. 211. ((Part 2)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Siegel J R, Rosenblatt D H. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:1753. doi: 10.1021/ja01540a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tarbell D S, Harnish D P. Chem Rev. 1951;49:1. doi: 10.1021/cr60152a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hoggarth E, Sexton W A. J Chem Soc. 1947:815. doi: 10.1039/JR9470000815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jiang Y, Qin Y, Xie S, Zhang X, Dong J, Ma D. Org Lett. 2009;11:5250. doi: 10.1021/ol902186d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Experimental details and spectroscopic data for new compounds.