Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2011 May 13;179(1):42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.05.003

Polysome profiling of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum

Joshua R Lacsina a,b,*, Gregory LaMonte c,d,*, Christopher V Nicchitta a,b,§, Jen-Tsan Chi c,d,§
PMCID: PMC3135974  NIHMSID: NIHMS306284  PMID: 21605599

Abstract

In the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, global studies of translational regulation have been hampered by the inability to isolate malaria polysomes. We describe here a novel method for polysome profiling in Plasmodium falciparum, a powerful approach which allows both a global view of translation and the measurement of ribosomal loading and density for specific mRNAs. Simultaneous lysis of infected erythrocytes and parasites releases stable, intact malaria polysomes, which are then purified by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion. The polysomes are resuspended, separated by velocity sedimentation and then fractionated, yielding a characteristic polysome profile reflecting the global level of translational activity in the parasite. RNA isolated from specific fractions can be used to determine the density of ribosomes loaded onto a particular transcript of interest, and is free of host ribosome contamination. Thus, our approach opens translational regulation in malaria to genome-wide analysis.

Keywords: malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, polysome, translation, post-transcriptional regulation, global


Beginning with the sequencing of the genome of Plasmodium falciparum [1], and continuing with the profiling of both the proteome [2,3] and transcriptome [4,5] global approaches to the study of malaria have led to significant new insights into the biology of this parasite. These discoveries include the dynamic stage-specific regulation of malaria transcription across its 48 hour erythrocytic lifecycle [2] and the identification of proteins specific for several host cell stages, including the liver, asexual and sexual erythrocytic stages [6]. These analyses have revealed significant differences in mRNA half-lives across the lifecycle [7], a relative underabundance of annotated transcription factors in the genome [1], and stage-specific upregulation of RNA binding proteins [8], indicating that there is substantial potential for post-transcriptional regulation in the parasite.

Differences between the transcriptomic [4,5] and proteomic [2,3] data highlight translation as a potential key regulatory point for Plasmodium gene expression. Indeed, translational regulation is critical for a rapid and reversible response to cell stress and drug exposure [9], and has been implicated in the transition between sexual and asexual stage parasites [10]. In contrast to the genome-wide approaches used to study the malaria proteome and transcriptome, there exist few methods to globally examine translational regulation in Plasmodium falciparum.

One of the most common experimental approaches to study translational regulation is polysome profiling. Polysome profiling is used to assess the overall translational activity in a population of cells and to determine the ribosome loading distributions of specific mRNAs of interest. Polysome profiling is achieved by ultracentrifugation of cell extracts, typically in sucrose gradients, to yield the separation of cellular components by hydrodynamic size. The concentration of RNA is determined across the density gradient and provides valuable information about the amount of free ribosomal subunits (40S and 60S, small and large subunits, respectively), monosomes and polysomes present in the sample. By fractionating the gradient, the method can resolve polysomes that differ in size by only a single ribosome, allowing calculation of ribosomal loading and density for a given mRNA [11]. Thus, polysome profiling allows precise studies of translational regulation both at the level of individual genes and across the whole transcriptome [12].

Developing a method for polysome profiling of P. falciparum has been met with substantial technical challenges. Previous efforts to purify ribosomes in Plasmodia resulted predominantly in the recovery of monosomes, while polysomes were of comparatively low abundance. Electron micrographs of purified ribosomes from Plasmodium knowlesi revealed mostly monosomes, although some rare polysomes were seen, composed of 4–6 ribosomes [13]. Polysome profiling of the avian malaria parasite, Plasmodium lophurae, similarly revealed a predominance of monosomes with rare polysomes [14]. The only polysome profile obtained for Plasmodium falciparum also showed a large monosome peak, but with poor resolution of polysomes and subunits [15]. In total, these earlier approaches were limited in their ability to recover malaria polysomes. Indeed, the difficulties in developing such an approach left it unclear whether substantial populations of polysomes were present in malaria at all. Without a means to purify malaria polysomes, it has not been possible to obtain the global translational profile of the parasite or interrogate the translational regulation of specific mRNAs.

We describe here a novel procedure to determine the polysome profile of Plasmodium falciparum. Due to concerns of host cell contamination, several procedures have been tested over time to separate the Plasmodium parasite from the host erythrocyte. One of the most common of these is saponin lysis of erythrocytes, followed by purification of the parasites by centrifugation [16]. For reasons that remain unclear, including this initial saponin lysis step in the procedure leads to breakdown of the polysomes into monosomes (Figure 1A). Thus, saponin lysis—which has been used for decades to isolate Plasmodium parasites—produces a monosome-dominated polysome profile.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Isolation of polysomes from Plasmodium falciparum. (A) A254 profile of polysomes extracted from saponin-lysed P. falciparum parasites (synchronized 32 hrs post-infection). (B) A254 profile of polysomes extracted by simultaneous lysis of P. falciparum in host erythrocytes (synchronized 32 hrs post-infection). (C) qPCR of 18S and 28S P. falciparum rRNA from isolated polysomes (n = 4; mean ± s.e.m.) (D) A254 profile of uninfected erythrocytes subjected to the polysome purification procedure. Plasmodium falciparum (strain 3D7) was cultured under standard conditions [18] using AlbuMAX I as a serum substitute. A minimum of 60 ml of parasite culture at 2% hematocrit and 10% parasitemia is necessary for polysome detection by A254. These conditions generate 100–500 μg of total RNA, depending on parasite lifecycle stage. Parasites 4–8 hours post-infection generate 100–150 μg of total RNA, while parasites 32–40 hours post-infection yield ~500 μg total RNA. A thin blood smear Giemsa stain was performed to determine parasitemia. Parasite cultures (with a mixture of infected and uninfected erythrocytes) were treated with 200 μM cycloheximide (CHX) at 37 °C for 10 minutes to arrest elongating ribosomes and stabilize polysomes. The red blood cells (RBCs) at 10% parasitemia were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 xg at room temperature, then washed twice with room temperature phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 200 μM CHX. The RBCs were resuspended in PBS with 200 μM CHX, pelleted as above, and kept on ice. The supernatant was aspirated and the pellet was lysed in lysis buffer (1% v/v Igepal CA-630, 0.5% w/v deoxycholate (DOC), 400 mM potassium acetate, 25 mM potassium HEPES, pH 7.2, 15 mM magnesium acetate, 200 μM CHX, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonate fluoride (PMSF), 40 U/ml RNaseOUT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA)) [19] yielding a final lysate volume of approximately 4.25 ml. The lysate was rotated end-over-end at 4 °C for 10 min to achieve complete lysis of the RBCs and parasites, then clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 xg at 4 °C for 10 min. To isolate malaria polysomes, 3.75 ml of clarified lysate was layered atop 1.25 ml of 0.5 M sucrose cushion (0.5 M sucrose, 400 mM potassium acetate, 25 mM potassium HEPES, pH 7.2, 15 mM magnesium acetate, 200 μM CHX, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 40 U/ml RNaseOUT). Samples were centrifuged for 146 min at 55,000 rpm (4 °C) in an SW-55 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). Supernatants were saved, while the ribosomal pellets were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for later use. The frozen ribosome pellets were resuspended in 500 μl of ribosome resuspension buffer (400 mM potassium acetate, 25 mM potassium HEPES, pH 7.2, 15 mM magnesium acetate, 200 μM CHX, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 40 U/ml RNaseOUT in RNase-free water) and clarified at 16,000 xg at 4 °C for 10 min. The ribosome suspension was layered atop a 10 ml continuous linear 15–50% sucrose gradient (sucrose w/v in ribosome resuspension buffer above), and centrifuged in an SW41 rotor (Beckman Coulter) for 3 hrs at 35,000 rpm (4 °C). Fractions of 330 μl were collected using an automated Density Gradient Fractionation System (Teledyne Isco, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) with a simultaneous A254 trace and stored at −80 °C. Symbol legend: *40S ribosomal subunit, +60S ribosomal subunit, ‡80S monosome.

To circumvent this obstacle and obtain the native polysome profile, we directly and simultaneously lysed both the infected erythrocytes and the parasite contained within. We employed a lysis buffer which has been optimized and applied in a variety of experimental contexts for the isolation and profiling of polysomes in eukaryotes [19]. The lysis buffer contains both a high concentration of potassium acetate (400 mM) that is necessary to effectively solubilize membrane-bound ribosomes (thus preventing bias towards cytoplasmic ribosomal fractions), and magnesium (15 mM) to maintain nuclear integrity.

Following simultaneous lysis of the erythrocytes and parasites, we purified the ribosomes and subunits from the lysate by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion. The appearance of the ribosomal pellet varies between runs; it may look transparent and glassy, or may contain reddish-brown insoluble material. (Flash-freezing, storage at −80 °C, and thawing of the ribosomal pellet cause no loss to polysomal integrity (data not shown).) The ribosomal pellet was resuspended and loaded onto a continuous sucrose gradient to resolve the ribosomal subunits, monosomes, and polysomes by velocity sedimentation, followed by simultaneous A254 detection and fractionation. We have observed that RNA yields vary considerably with the lifecycle stage of the parasite, where trophozite and schizont stage cultures (20+ hours post-infection) require around half of the input of early ring stage cultures (4–8 hours post-infection). In practice, the minimum input is 60 ml of synchronized infected culture for trophozoites/schizonts versus at least 120 ml for rings at 10% parasitemia.

A typical A254 trace is shown in Figure 1B, with the direction of sedimentation from left to right on the graph (lighter fractions to the left). The initial A254 is high, likely due to absorbance by hemoglobin in the early fractions. The A254 then drops precipitously to baseline. The first peak is small, and corresponds to the small ribosomal subunit (40S). The second peak is slightly taller than the first, and corresponds to the large ribosomal subunit (60S). The next peak is the largest, and corresponds to the monosome peak (80S). Following the monosome peak are the peaks corresponding to polysomes. Each successive peak represents polysomes bearing progressively higher integral numbers of ribosomes (2, 3, 4, etc.). Typical runs allow the resolution of polysomes composed of 5–7 ribosomes, though we have resolved up to 9-mer polysomes in some runs with a larger amount of starting material (~500 μg of total RNA input, equal to 120–180 ml of infected Plasmodium falciparum culture at 10% parasitemia and 32+ hours post-infection, and at least 180 ml for earlier infection stages). Higher order polysomes compose the remainder of the trace, and cannot be resolved under these gradient conditions. In order to confirm that the A254 signal represents rRNA, qPCR was performed to quantitate 18S and 28S rRNA across the gradient (Figure 1C). The qPCR results corroborate the identities of the A254 profile peaks described above.

Concerns are often raised about the contamination of Plasmodium samples with nucleated blood cells, and in this case, contamination with host-derived ribosomes. To ensure sample purity, it is advantageous to run uninfected erythrocytes through the above procedure to compare the A254 traces of infected and uninfected erythrocytes. When we have done this, we observe no pellet after centrifugation through the sucrose cushion, and see no A254 signal above baseline after velocity sedimentation (Figure 1D). Importantly, we also observe that malaria-specific transcripts co-migrate with the polysomal fractions (Figure 2), consistent with the polysomes being parasite-derived.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ribosomal loading of Plasmodium falciparum mRNAs. (A) Comparison of ribosomal loading profile of several malaria transcripts. Malaria polysomes were harvested, profiled, and fractionated 32 hours post-infection, as described in Fig. 1. Total parasite RNA was isolated from each fraction using a mirVana Isolation Kit (Ambion). Transcript abundance was quantified in fractions across the gradient by SYBR Green qPCR for the following parasite proteins: knob-associated histidine rich protein 3 (KAHRP), ring-infected erythrocyte surface antigen (RESA), cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, regulatory subunit (PKA-R) and phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT) (primers indicated in Supplemental Table 1). Transcript abundance was normalized against total transcript level for each fraction within the gradient (n = 3; mean ± s.e.m.) (B) Lifecycle stage-dependent differences in ribosomal loading. At 8 hours (red) and 32 hours (blue) post-infection, malaria polysomes were harvested, profiled, and fractionated as above. RESA mRNA was quantified in fractions across the gradient by SYBR Green qPCR as described in (A) (n = 3; mean ± s.e.m.) Symbol legend: *40S ribosomal subunit, +60S ribosomal subunit, ‡80S monosome.

These studies demonstrate that substantial quantities of polysomes are present in Plasmodium falciparum and that the polysomes can be isolated with sufficient quality and purity for translational profiling. With this method, it is now possible to directly examine the global translational status of the parasite. This opens the door for novel investigations into how translation is regulated over the course of the malaria lifecycle and how the translational profile changes in response to varying experimental conditions. In addition to obtaining a global translational profile, we can apply this approach to investigate the translational activity of specific mRNAs. RNAs can be extracted from the gradient fractions using standard guanidinium thiocyanate-based methods (TRIzol, Invitrogen) or spin columns (RNeasy, Qiagen or mirVana, Ambion). The yield depends on the starting amount of parasite, but is generally sufficient for Northern blots, RNA sequencing, microarrays, or qPCR. The A254 trace is used to determine the ribosomal loading of mRNAs purified from specific fractions.

As a proof-of-principle, we first sought to demonstrate that our method could distinguish between mRNAs with different ribosomal loading profiles. We compared the sedimentation profiles of four different parasite mRNAs at 32 hours post-infection (Figure 2A). Transcripts for both phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT, PlasmoDB ID: MAL13P1.214) and knob-associated histidine rich protein 3 (KAHRP, PlasmoDB ID: PfB0100c) co-sedimented predominantly with heavy polysomes. In contrast, a subset (~10%) of mRNAs encoding ring-infected erythrocyte surface antigen (RESA, PlasmoDB ID: PfA0110w) accumulated with the 40S small subunit, suggesting that this subset of RESA transcripts initiates translation with decreased efficiency. A significant subset of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, regulatory subunit (PKA-R, PlasmoDB ID: PfL1110c) mRNAs co-sedimented with 80S monosome (fraction #15), indicating alternative translational regulation of this subset relative to the rest of the PKA-R transcripts. Translational regulation of PKA-R is of particular interest, because this gene is involved in the transition from the asexual to sexual blood stage [17], and translational regulation in the blood stage of P. falciparum has previously been demonstrated primarily in gametocytes [10]. We have therefore shown that polysome profiling can be applied in malaria to detect transcript-specific differences in ribosomal loading.

To relate ribosomal loading data to translational regulation, we used analytical methods developed previously by Arava and colleagues [11]. We used the malaria polysome profile to calculate the average number and density of ribosomes loaded onto mRNAs of interest. While the average number of loaded ribosomes increases with ORF length, ribosomal density is of particular interest because it is largely determined by the rates of the three stages of translation: initiation, elongation, and termination. High ribosomal density indicates efficient initiation or inefficient elongation or termination; conversely, low ribosomal density reflects impaired initiation or speedy elongation or termination. Thus, changes in ribosomal density for a specific mRNA point to shifts in translational regulation. Alternatively, extremely high or low ribosomal density can indicate unusual mechanisms of translational regulation specific to that mRNA. (Notably, ribosomal density has been shown in other organisms to decrease as ORF length increases [11]. Until the relationship between ribosomal density and ORF length is established for P. falciparum at a genome-wide level, we caution against comparing ribosomal density between different mRNAs, unless the ORFs are of comparable length.)

We applied this analysis to our malaria data as follows: the A254 polysome trace (Figure 1B) was used to determine the number of ribosomes per mRNA for each fraction. Using the qPCR data to calculate the percentage of a given mRNA in each fraction (Figure 2), we determined the number of ribosomes loaded per mRNA as a weighted average (Table 1, second column). By obtaining ORF lengths from the most recent assembly of the P. falciparum genome (Table 1, third column), we calculated ribosomal density and spacing (Table 1, fourth and fifth columns). Because a eukaryotic ribosome spans ~35 nucleotides [11], we were also able to calculate the percentage of the maximal ribosomal packing density occupied by ribosomes on each transcript (Table 1, last column).

Table 1.

Ribosomal loading and ribosomal density of Plasmodium falciparum mRNAs.

Gene Number of ribosomes per mRNA (weighted average)b ORF length (nts)c Number of ribosomes per 100 ntsd Ribosome spacing (one ribosome per X nts)e % maximal ribosomal packing densityf
PEAMT 5.40 801 0.67 148 23.57%
KAHRP 4.02 2312 0.17 575 6.09%
RESA 4.09 3258 0.13 797 4.39%
PKA-R 3.98 1326 0.30 333 10.52%
RESA, 8 hrs p.i.a 5.14 3258 0.16 634 5.52%
RESA, 32 hrs p.i. 4.09 3258 0.13 797 4.39%

All calculations adapted from [12].

a

p.i. = post-infection.

b

Sum of (# ribosomes per mRNA for Fraction X) x (% of mRNA in Fraction X) for all fractions.

c

From the Plasmodium falciparum (3D7) chromosome sequence and annotation (version: 2010–06–01).

d

(Number of ribosomes per mRNA) ÷ (ORF length) x 100.

e

100 ÷ (Number of ribosomes per 100 nts).

f

(~35 nts spanned per ribosome) ÷ (ribosome spacing).

Our initial studies of ribosomal density in P. falciparum are consistent with the findings of Arava and colleagues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [11]. For the four genes examined in Figure 2A, we obtained densities ranging from 0.13 to 0.67 ribosomes per 100 nts (Table 1, fourth column), well within the range of 0.03 to 3.3 per 100 nts reported by Arava et al. Similar to prior findings in yeast, malaria transcripts do not display maximal ribosome loading (Table 1, final column), suggesting that initiation is rate-limiting under the experimental conditions used. Finally, within our very limited sample we do note a negative relationship between ORF length and ribosomal density, as seen previously. These findings demonstrate that polysome profiling makes it possible to quantitatively analyze translational regulation in malaria, providing a powerful approach to track changes in Plasmodium translation at the level of individual genes.

We then applied polysome profiling to examine differences in ribosomal loading and density of a specific mRNA over the course of the P. falciparum lifecycle. We chose the RESA gene, which shows marked differences in transcriptional regulation across the 48 hour erythrocytic lifecycle [4]. At 8 hours post-infection (Figure 2B) all of the RESA transcripts were localized in heavy polysome fractions, while at 32 hours post-infection (Figure 2A, 2B) a subset of RESA transcripts co-localized with the small ribosomal subunit, indicative of a decreased efficiency in translation initiation. The average density of ribosomes on RESA transcripts decreased 20% from the 8 to 32 hour time point (Table 1, lower), reflecting the shift in a subset of mRNAs from the polysome pool to the non-translating, small subunit-associated pool. These results demonstrate that polysome profiling is capable of revealing changes in the translation of individual mRNAs throughout the P. falciparum lifecycle.

Additionally, proteins can be purified from the fractions by immunoprecipitation or by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. These approaches are especially useful for studying the protein composition of mRNPs with different ribosomal loading profiles and for studying candidate proteins that modulate translation or act co-translationally.

In summary, we report a robust procedure for the isolation and profiling of polysomes from Plasmodium falciparum. With this method, the global translational status of the malaria parasite can be examined at a genome-wide scale, helping to bridge our gap in knowledge between the malaria transcriptome and proteome. Data on the ribosomal loading of transcripts can be readily obtained and analyzed to determine the density of ribosomes on mRNAs for specific genes. Changes in ribosomal density can be used to establish how translation is regulated throughout the parasite lifecycle. We will also be able to screen for genes that show unusual translation profiles, reflecting alternative modes of regulation. Finally, it will be of particular interest to use polysome profiling to evaluate how the malaria translatome responds to novel antimalarial agents and to identify translation-based mechanisms of drug resistance.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

The authors thank J. Taylor Herbert and Timothy Haystead for providing malaria cultures used during the development of this protocol. This research was funded by NIH R21DK080994 (JTC), NIH GM077382 (CVN), the Duke Chancellor’s pilot project fund, the Roche Foundation for Anemia Research (RoFAR), The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Joshua R. Lacsina, Email: jrl3@duke.edu.

Gregory LaMonte, Email: greg.lamonte@duke.edu.

Christopher V. Nicchitta, Email: c.nicchitta@cellbio.duke.edu.

Jen-Tsan Chi, Email: chi00002@mc.duke.edu.

References

  • 1.Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2002;419:498–511. doi: 10.1038/nature01097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD, Anthony RM, Grainger M, Haynes JD, et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum lifecycle. Nature. 2002;419:520–6. doi: 10.1038/nature01107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lasonder E, Ishihama Y, Andersen JS, Vermunt AM, Pain A, Sauerwein RW, et al. Analysis of the Plasmodium falciparum proteome by high-accuracy mass spectrometry. Nature. 2002;419:537–42. doi: 10.1038/nature01111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bozdech Z, Llinás M, Pulliam BL, Wong ED, Zhu J, DeRisi JL. The transcriptome of the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Otto TD, Wilinski D, Assefa S, Keane TM, Sarry LR, Böhme U, et al. New insights into the blood-stage transcriptome of Plasmodium falciparum using RNA-Seq. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76:12–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07026.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM, et al. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–2620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0805011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shock JL, Fischer KF, DeRisi JL. Whole-genome analysis of mRNA decay in Plasmodium falciparum reveals a global lengthening of mRNA half-life during the intra-erythrocytic development cycle. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R134. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hall N, Karras M, Raine JD, Carlton JM, Kooij TW, Berriman M, et al. A comprehensive survey of the Plasmodium life cycle by genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses. Science. 2005;307:82–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1103717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Holcik M, Sonenberg N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:318–27. doi: 10.1038/nrm1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mair GR, Braks JA, Garver LS, Wiegant JC, Hall N, Dirks RW, et al. Regulation of sexual development of Plasmodium by translational repression. Science. 2006;13:667–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1125129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arava Y, Wang Y, Storey JD, Liu CL, Brown PO, Herschlag D. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3889–94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0635171100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arava Y. Isolation of polysomal RNA for microarray analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;224:79–87. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-364-X:79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aikawa M, Cook RT. Ribosomes of the malarial parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi. II. Ultrastructural features. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1971;39:913–7. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(71)90114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallach M, Kilejian A. The importance of tRNA for the in vitro cell-free translation of messenger RNA isolated from the malaria parasite Plasmodium lophurae. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1982;5:245–61. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(82)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferreras A, Triana L, Correia H, Sánchez E, Herrera F. An in vitro system from Plasmodium falciparum active in endogenous mRNA translation. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000;95:231–5. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762000000200017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Christophers SR, Fulton JD. Experiments with isolated malaria parasites (Plasmodium knowlesi) free from red cells. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1939;33:161–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trager W, Gill GS. Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte formation in vitro: its stimulation by phorbol diesters and by 8-bromo cyclic adenosine monophosphate. J Protozool. 1989;36:451–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1989.tb01079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ringwald P, Meche FS, Bickii J, Basco LK. In vitro culture and drug sensitivity assay of Plasmodium falciparum with nonserum substitute and acute-phase sera. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:700–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.3.700-705.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jagannathan S, Nwosu C, Nicchitta CV. Analyzing mRNA localization to the endoplasmic reticulum via cell fractionation. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;714:301–321. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-005-8_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES