Skip to main content
European Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to European Journal of Human Genetics
. 2011 Feb 23;19(7):796–800. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.19

Identification of ACOX2 as a shared genetic risk factor for preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease

Åsa Johansson 1,2,3,*, Joanne E Curran 2, Matthew P Johnson 2, Katy A Freed 2, Mona H Fenstad 1,4, Line Bjørge 5, Irina P Eide 6, Melanie A Carless 2, David L Rainwater 2, Harald HH Goring 2, Rigmor Austgulen 1, Eric K Moses 2, John Blangero 2
PMCID: PMC3137494  PMID: 21343950

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a serious complication of pregnancy, which is highly correlated with later life cardiovascular disease (CVD). Many risk factors are common for both diseases, but the contribution of shared genes remains to be determined. In this study, we used an integrative strategy to assess lipid traits as risk factors for PE and CVD by whole genome transcriptional profiling performed on Norwegian decidua basalis tissues (N=95) from preeclamptic and normal pregnancies and on blood lymphocytes (N=1240) from the San Antonio Family Heart Study (SAFHS). Among 222 genes that were differentially expressed (false discovery rate (FDR) P-value <0.05) between the PE, cases and controls, we found one gene, ACOX2 (acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 2, branched chain), that was downregulated in PE whose transcription was also inversely correlated with triglyceride levels (P=5.6 × 10−7; FDR P-value=0.0002) in SAFHS. We further report associations between SNPs in the ACOX2 gene and the transcription level (P-value=0.0045) of the gene, as well as with triglyceride levels (P-value=0.0051). ACOX2 is involved in bile acid production, a process that has been associated with both oxidative stress and regulation of triglyceride levels. Oxidative stress and increased triglyceride levels are known risk factors for CVD and both have also been associated with PE. Our results suggest that downregulation of ACOX2 is a shared risk factor for PE and CVD.

Keywords: preeclampsia, triglyceride, hyperlipidemia, transcription profiling

INTRODUCTION

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific disorder. With 50 000 deaths annually and over four million incidences, PE is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide.1 Even though PE is a common disorder, which complicates about 3–5% of all pregnancies, there is still no effective treatment available except delivery. Consequently, PE accounts for approximately 20% of all preterm births.2 The pathogenesis of PE is not understood clearly. It might include endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, similar to that associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD).3 Both PE and CVD also share several metabolic abnormalities,4 including increase in small, dense low-density lipoprotein and triglycerides.5 Still, years after PE, many women have increased blood pressure, insulin resistance, triglycerides, and uric acid compared to women with normal pregnancies. Pregnancy constitutes a vascular and metabolic stress and one hypothesis is that women in the risk group of developing metabolic syndrome respond to pregnancy in an abnormal way. Thus, the same predisposing factors giving rise to PE during pregnancy may later in life cause CVD. PE has also been associated with an increased risk of later life CVD.6, 7

PE is a complex disorder influenced by multiple genetic and environmental factors and their interactions. A number of environmental risk factors have been identified and the heritability has been estimated to be 0.54.8 Transcriptional profiling has been shown to be a powerful method to identify genetic variants influencing common human traits.9 Many genes have also been identified to be differentially expressed in the placenta or in decidual tissues between women with PE and women with normal pregnancies.10, 11, 12 However, it is still unknown whether such differential gene expression is causal or is secondary to the disorder.

The aim of this study was to identify shared genetic risk factors for PE and CVD by integrating genome-wide decidual transcriptomic data from preeclamptic and control pregnancies ascertained in Norway with genome-wide lymphocyte transcriptomic data, genome-wide SNP genotyping data and CVD-related lipid phenotypic data from the San Antonio family heart study (SAFHS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Norwegian PE case–control study

Study groups

Pregnant women delivered by cesarean section were recruited at St Olavs University Hospital (Trondheim, Norway) and Haukeland University Hospital (Bergen, Norway) from 2002 to 2006. PE was defined as persistent hypertension (blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg) plus proteinuria (≥0.3 g per day or ≥1+ according to a dipstick test) on at least two occasions, developing after 20 weeks of pregnancy.13 Cesarean section was performed on preeclamptic women on medical indications. Exclusively women with normal pregnancies and no previous history of PE were accepted in the control group. The cesarean sections on controls were carried out for reasons such as breech presentation, cephalopelvic disproportion in earlier pregnancies or maternal request. Women with previous pregnancy complications (such as PE or intrauterine growth retardation) as well as women with multiple pregnancies, pregnancies with chromosomal aberrations, fetal and placental structural abnormalities, or suspected perinatal infections were not enrolled as controls. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before collection of decidual samples and the study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (REK 106-03).

Transcriptional profiling

Transcriptional profiling was performed on decidua basalis tissues from 37 cases and 58 controls using Illumina Human-6 v.2 Expression BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to Illumina's standard protocols. The sample preparation has been described previously,11, 14 and the data set is available at ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/) (accession code E-TABM-682). To make all transcription values comparable across individuals as well as across genes, these were normalized using rank-based inverse normal transformation as described previously.9

The SAFHS

Study groups

The SAFHS includes 1240 individuals from 42 extended families of Mexican Americans from San Antonio, TX, USA.9, 15, 16 This study aims to quantify the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the risk of developing CVD and participants were not ascertained owing to CVD status. Phenotypic assessment of cardiovascular risk factors has been performed, including serum levels of lipids, lipoproteins, glucose, hormones, adiposity, and blood pressure. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before collection of samples and the study was approved by the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio IRB.

Transcriptional profiling and genome-wide SNP data

Transcriptional profiling of lymphocyte-derived RNA has previously been performed on 1240 participants from the SAFHS using the Illumina Sentrix Human Whole Genome (WG-6) Series I BeadChips.9 This array includes 47 289 unique probes, of which 19 648 showed significant expressions in the SAFHS data set. This data set is available at ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/) (accession code E-TABM-305). In addition, 858 individuals have been genotyped according to the manufacturer's instructions on using the Illumina Human1M-Duo BeadChip (Illumina). Analysis of the raw data was carried out in the BeadStudio software with the recommended parameters for the Infinium assay and using the genotype cluster files provided by Illumina. Samples with a call rate below 97%, SNPs with call rate below 95%, and SNPs deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P<1.0 × 106) were excluded.

Statistical analyses

Differentially expressed genes were identified using the stats library in R. A linear regression model (transcription level ∼PE status+RIN, where RIN is the RNA integrity number) was fitted for each transcript using the lm() function. Summary statistics were computed for the fitted linear model using the summary.lm() function and the P-values were extracted based on t-statistics. False discovery rate (FDR)17 was calculated using the fdrtool() function implemented in the fdrtool R library.18 For downstream analyses, only the differentially expressed genes (FDR P-value <0.05) were included. The correlation between the transcription level and the cardiovascular phenotypes (high-density lipoprotein-C, low-density lipoprotein-C, triglycerides, and total cholesterol) were estimated using a maximum-likelihood test for family data, implemented in SOLAR.19 Cis-regulating SNPs and SNPs associated with the lipid traits (high-density lipoprotein-C, low-density lipoprotein-C, triglycerides, or total cholesterol) were identified using an additive model of association for family data, implemented in SOLAR.19

RESULTS

An overview of the study design is presented in Table 1 and the clinical characteristics of the PE study group can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Whole genome expression profiling in decidua basalis tissue from Norwegian preeclamptic cases and controls identified 24 625 transcripts that were detected above background signals (P<0.01), out of the 48 701 probes. In total, 222 genes (Supplementary data Table S2) were differentially expressed between the PE cases and controls (FDR P-value <0.05). For the whole genome profiling in the SAFHS, 19 648 transcripts were detected above the background signals (P<0.01), out of 47 289 unique probes. In total, 109 of the 222 transcripts that were differentially expressed in the decidual tissues were significantly expressed in the lymphocyte data from the SAFHS (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 1. Overview of the steps in the study design.

Step no. Analyses Sample type Study population
1 Identification of differentially expressed genes in PE Transcription profiling data from decidual basalis Norwegian PE and non-PE women
2 Identify genes from step no. 1 that are expressed above background level in the SAFHS blood lymphocytes Transcription profiling data from blood lymphocytes San Antonio Family Heart Study
3 Investigate if the genes from step no. 2 are correlated with variation in lipid levels Transcription profiling data from blood lymphocytes San Antonio Family Heart Study
4 Identify SNPs that are genotyped in the top gene from step no. 3 Genome-wide SNP data San Antonio Family Heart Study
5 Test if the SNPs from step no. 4 are associated with variation in lipid levels Lipid levels and SNPs San Antonio Family Heart Study
6 Test if the SNPs from step no. 4 are associated with transcription level of the gene (cis-regulation) Transcription profiling data (blood lymphocytes) and SNPs San Antonio Family Heart Study

Correlation of leukocyte gene expression levels with lipid levels

The transcription levels of 10 out of 109 genes tested were associated (FDR P-value <0.05) with one or more of the lipid traits (Table 2). Although the P-value for most transcripts fell just below the threshold of significance, the correlation between expression of ACOX2 (acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 2, branched chain) and triglyceride levels was highly significant (P=5.64 × 10−7; FDR P-value=0.00017). The transcription level of ACOX2 is inversely correlated (negative β) with both triglyceride levels and PE status (Table 2).

Table 2. Correlations between the transcription levels and PE status in the Norwegian cohort and between the transcription levels and lipid levels in the SAFHS.

  Correlation to PE status Correlation to lipid levels
Gene symbol β P-value FDR P-value Lipid trait β P-value FDR P-value
ACOX2 −0.83 2.2 × 10−6 0.017 Triglyceride −0.152 5.6 × 10−7 0.0002
ZNF154 −0.69 3.3 × 10−4 0.046 HDL-C −0.102 2.3 × 10−4 0.023
PDZD4 −0.71 2.7 × 10−4 0.043 Total cholesterol 0.099 4.1 × 10−4 0.026
SEC23B 0.67 2.7 × 10−4 0.044 Triglyceride −0.106 4.1 × 10−4 0.026
PLCG1 −0.81 2.1 × 10−5 0.018 Triglyceride 0.103 4.9 × 10−4 0.027
SPPL2A 0.72 1.4 × 10−4 0.034 Triglyceride −0.103 5.9 × 10−4 0.028
LRRC14 −0.72 1.9 × 10−4 0.038 HDL-C −0.100 7.8 × 10−4 0.029
KIAA1598 0.71 2.4 × 10−4 0.043 Triglyceride −0.099 7.8 × 10−4 0.029
NOD1 −0.78 5.3 × 10−5 0.024 Triglyceride 0.097 1.4 × 10−3 0.043
TMEM140 −0.73 1.4 × 10−4 0.034 Triglyceride 0.094 1.9 × 10−3 0.049

ACOX2 is cis-regulated and genetic variation is associated with triglyceride levels

We used the genotype data from the SAFHS to identify proximal cis-regulatory SNPs (SNPs that regulate the transcription level of the gene they are located in). There were eight SNPs on the BeadChip that were within the gene, in 5′- or 3′-untranslated region or close to (10 kb upstream) the ACOX2 gene (Table 3). One SNP (rs4681689) was associated (P=0.0051) with triglyceride levels. Two others (rs1127745 and rs13434020) that are in complete linkage disequilibrium were associated with the transcription level of the gene (P=0.0045). Adjusting for multiple testing (seven independent tests), the associations with triglyceride, and expression levels remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted P=0.032 vs 0.036).

Table 3. Association of the SNPs in the ACOX2 gene region with the transcription level of the gene and with triglyceride levels.

SNP name Positions Effective allele Effective allele frequency P-value cis-regulation P-value triglycerides
rs6795193 58472819 A 0.22 0.2337 0.2082
rs4317122 58473883 A 0.32 0.0815 0.0161
rs4681689 58477748 A 0.19 0.0464 0.0051b
rs7651276 58481890 A 0.17 0.3747 0.1731
rs1127745a 58487277 G 0.14 0.0045b 0.8671
rs13434020a 58487940 C 0.14 0.0045b 0.8671
rs4681690 58490606 C 0.2 0.2628 0.4463
rs4387990 58491423 A 0.37 0.6437 0.6499
a

rs1127745 and rs13434020 are in complete LD.

b

P-value <0.05 after Bonferroni correction for seven independent SNPs test.

DISCUSSION

We have shown that the ACOX2 gene is downregulated in decidual tissue collected from Norwegian women with PE (negative β; Table 2). We have also found that the transcription level of ACOX2 in leukocytes from SAFHS to be inversely correlated (negative β; Table 2) with triglyceride levels. Increased triglyceride levels are a well-known independent risk factor for CVD,20 and increased triglyceride levels has also been reported in PE.21, 22, 23 We propose that increased triglyceride levels caused by the downregulation of ACOX2 to be a possible shared genetic risk factor for PE and CVD.

Peroxisomes are one of the main locations for lipid metabolism in human beings.24 They are involved in the β-oxidation of very long straight-chain fatty acids, branched-chain fatty acids, dicarboxylic fatty acids, and eicosanoids, as well as in the β-oxidation of the side chain of the bile acid intermediates, resulting in the formation of the primary bile acids. These different substrates are likely to be degraded by distinct oxidation pathways, where the first and rate-limiting step is carried out by two acyl-CoA oxidases.25 However, ACOX2 oxidizes the CoA esters of 2-methyl-branched fatty acids and of the bile acid intermediates di- and trihydroxycoprostanic acids. Insufficient levels of ACOX2 are likely to affect the bile acid production by increasing the fraction of bile acid intermediates to mature bile acids. Furthermore, it has been shown that mature bile acid is an activator of the farnesoid X receptor (F × R) leading to reduced levels of triglycerides,26 which suggests that FXR plays a critical role in lipid metabolism. Thus, our observation of the highly inverse correlation between the transcription levels of ACOX2 and triglyceride levels suggests that ACOX2 may act as a regulator triglyceride levels through the FXR.

Hypertriglyceridemia can elevate free fatty acid concentrations and decrease low-density lipoprotein particle size giving rise to lipid peroxidation, one of the important lipid abnormalities seen in PE.27 Increased lipid peroxidation may confer PE susceptibility by endothelial cell activation.21 Similarly, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins have been suggested to trigger endothelial dysfunction28 and artherothrombosis,29 and they also play an important role in thrombin formation and may induce platelet aggregation, which can contribute to coagulopathy, another characteristic of PE.30 An alternative explanation to downregulation of ACOX2 in PE might be through the bile acid intermediates. Although ACOX2 plays a direct role in the formation of bile acids, it is likely that there also is a connection between ACOX2 and the level of bile acid intermediates. Some bile acid intermediates promote generation of reactive oxygen species leading to oxidative stress.31 A number of studies indicate that oxidative stress plays an important role in the etiology of PE32, 33 and CVD.34

In our study, we identified SNPs associated with transcriptional regulation of the ACOX2 gene and with variation in serum triglyceride levels. Our data suggest that the ACOX2 gene harbors regulatory and potentially functional variants that may be of relevance to the regulation of triglyceride levels and to disease susceptibility. Recently, a large number of genome-wide association studies has been performed and hundreds of SNPs have been identified to be associated with different human traits, including serum triglyceride levels.35 To our knowledge, no association between triglycerides and SNPs in ACOX2 has been seen. However, the fraction of the heritability explained by the SNPs identified by genome-wide association studies is low, and most of the variation behind human traits remains unknown.35 This might be due to rare variants, which are under-represented in genome-wide association studies, playing an important role in phenotypic variation, or due to incomplete linkage disequilibrium between the typed markers and the causal variants. To date, more than 200 SNPs have already been identified in the ACOX2 gene region and the linkage disequilibrium in the region is modest. Consequently, the true regulatory and functional SNPs within the region are not likely to be present within our set of eight SNPs (which is typically typed in most genome-wide association studies), and resequencing and/or additional SNP typing is required to be able to identify these variants. In our study, both phenotypes (PE and triglyceride levels) are correlated with expression levels to a much higher extent than to the available SNPs. Consequently, it is tempting to speculate that the regulation of ACOX2 expression is not dramatically influenced by any one SNP, but rather multiple factors, for example, epigenetic and trans-regulation play contributory roles. It has also been shown previously that the methylation pattern of many genes differ between placentas from women with PE compared to controls.36

In addition to ACOX2, we identified nine other genes whose transcription levels were correlated to both PE status and lipid levels (Table 2). Even though these show lower statistical significance compared with ACOX2, we cannot exclude any of these genes from being as important in relation to developing both PE and CVD. Two of these genes in particular are worth noting. NOD1 and SPPL2A both play an important role in the immune response and the development of inflammatory disease37, 38 and are therefore plausible candidate risk genes for PE and CVD.

One limitation to our study is that the PE cases and controls are not matched with regard to gestational age (Supplementary Table S1). It has been reported that the expression level changes dramatically for some genes between mid-gestation and term.39 However, among our top genes (Table 1) only one, KIAA1598, has previously been shown to differ between term and mid-gestation,39 and there is no indication that expression of ACOX2 should be influenced by gestational age. In addition, women giving birth pre-term without any indications of PE are likely to suffer from some other health complication (eg, infections)40 that might as well influence the transcription level. There are also other factors that do differ slightly (not significant) between groups (Supplementary Table S1). However, including additional covariates, such as body mass index, maternal and infant sex and parity in the regression analyses did not change the results (data not shown). We have not performed validation of the expression values in our study, primarily due to lack of RNA available for these validation experiments. However, in other studies, microarrays have been shown to give accurate detection of transcripts with a high correlation to reverse transcription-PCR verifications.11 The normalization procedure for reverse transcription-PCR uses housekeeping genes whose expression in fact varies dramatically between individuals.9 Consequently, the normalization carried out for the microarray experiment, based on the average expression level per individual, is likely to be much more accurate. Genetic and environmental factors might differ between Norway and Texas/Mexico. Also, the major difference between the samples is the different tissues studied (basalis tissues vs blood lymphocytes) as the expression of some genes is tissue specific. This also explains that 109 of 222 PE transcripts were expressed above the background level in the lymphocytes.

In summary, we have identified ACOX2 to be downregulated in decidual tissues from women with PE and the expression level of the gene in peripheral lymphocytes to be inversely correlated with circulating triglyceride levels. In addition, SNPs within the ACOX2 gene appears to influence both the expression of the gene as well as serum triglyceride levels. The involvement of ACOX2 in bile acid formation, and subsequent association of bile acids and their intermediates with both oxidative stress and regulation of triglyceride levels makes ACOX2 a likely candidate gene in the pathogenesis of both PE and CVD.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from FUGE – Functional genomics in Norway within the Research Council of Norway (ÅJ, MHF), by motility grant from NTNU – The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (ÅJ), Sven and Dagmar Saléns foundation (ÅJ) and the Fulbright foundation for educational exchange (MHF). The work was also supported by National Institutes of Health grants (grant number HD049847) (to EKM, SPB). This investigation was conducted in facilities constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Program grants (grant numbers RR13556, RR017515) from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. The SAFHS is supported by NLBI (grant number HL45522) and SOLAR software is supported by NIMH (grant number MH59490). We would like to thank Mari Löset, Siv B Mundal and everyone who have contributed to produce the data that are used in this study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on European Journal of Human Genetics website (http://www.nature.com/ejhg)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Table S2

References

  1. Roberts JM, Pearson G, Cutler J, Lindheimer M. Summary of the NHLBI Working Group on Research on Hypertension During Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2003;41:437–445. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000054981.03589.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldenberg RL, Rouse DJ. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:313–320. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807303390506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craici I, Wagner S, Garovic VD. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular risk: formal risk factor or failed stress test. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;2:249–259. doi: 10.1177/1753944708094227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Lund-Nilsen TI, Salvesen KA, Davey Smith G, Romundstad PR. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335:978. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39366.416817.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sattar N, Bendomir A, Berry C, Shepherd J, Greer IA, Packard CJ. Lipoprotein subfraction concentrations in preeclampsia: pathogenic parallels to atherosclerosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:403–408. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00514-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2001;323:1213–1217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Funai EF, Friedlander Y, Paltiel O, et al. Long-term mortality after preeclampsia. Epidemiology. 2005;16:206–215. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000152912.02042.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Salonen Ros H, Lichtenstein P, Lipworth L, Cnattingius S. Genetic effects on the liability of developing pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. Am J Med Genet. 2000;91:256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goring HH, Curran JE, Johnson MP, et al. Discovery of expression QTLs using large-scale transcriptional profiling in human lymphocytes. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1208–1216. doi: 10.1038/ng2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Enquobahrie DA, Meller M, Rice K, Psaty BM, Siscovick DS, Williams MA. Differential placental gene expression in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:566–568. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Løset M, Mundal SB, Johnson MP, et al. A transcriptional profile of the decidua in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:84–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Winn VD, Gormley M, Paquet AC, et al. Severe preeclampsia-related changes in gene expression at the maternal-fetal interface include sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-6 and pappalysin-2. Endocrinology. 2009;150:452–462. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gifford RW, August PA, Cunningham G, et al. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:S1–S22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenstad MH, Johnson MP, Loset M, et al. STOX2 but not STOX1 is differentially expressed in decidua from preeclamptic women. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:960–968. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaq064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MacCluer JW, Stern MP, Almasy L, et al. Genetics of atherosclerosis risk factors in Mexican Americans. Nutr Rev. 1999;57:S59–S65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1999.tb01790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchell BD, Kammerer CM, Blangero J, et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans. The San Antonio Family Heart Study. Circulation. 1996;94:2159–2170. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.9.2159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990;9:811–818. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strimmer K. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:303. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Almasy L, Blangero J. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1198–1211. doi: 10.1086/301844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Criqui MH, Heiss G, Cohn R, et al. Plasma triglyceride level and mortality from coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1220–1225. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304293281702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chappell LC, Seed PT, Briley A, et al. A longitudinal study of biochemical variables in women at risk of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:127–136. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.122969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gratacos E, Casals E, Sanllehy C, Cararach V, Alonso PL, Fortuny A. Variation in lipid levels during pregnancy in women with different types of hypertension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:896–901. doi: 10.3109/00016349609055024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK, Evans RW, Hauth BA, Sims CJ, Roberts JM. Fasting serum triglycerides, free fatty acids, and malondialdehyde are increased in preeclampsia, are positively correlated, and decrease within 48 h post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:975–982. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reddy JK, Mannaerts GP. Peroxisomal lipid metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:343–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.14.070194.002015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Casteels M, Schepers L, Van Veldhoven PP, Eyssen HJ, Mannaerts GP. Separate peroxisomal oxidases for fatty acyl-CoAs and trihydroxycoprostanoyl-CoA in human liver. J Lipid Res. 1990;31:1865–1872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lefebvre P, Cariou B, Lien F, Kuipers F, Staels B. Role of bile acids and bile acid receptors in metabolic regulation. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:147–191. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hubel CA, Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rogers GM, McLaughlin MK. Lipid peroxidation in pregnancy: new perspectives on preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1025–1034. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90778-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kugiyama K, Doi H, Motoyama T, et al. Association of remnant lipoprotein levels with impairment of endothelium-dependent vasomotor function in human coronary arteries. Circulation. 1998;97:2519–2526. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.25.2519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mochizuki M, Takada Y, Urano T, et al. The in vitro effects of chylomicron remnant and very low density lipoprotein remnant on platelet aggregation in blood obtained from healthy persons. Thromb Res. 1996;81:583–593. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(96)00033-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wetzka B, Winkler K, Kinner M, Friedrich I, Marz W, Zahradnik HP. Altered lipid metabolism in preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome: links to enhanced platelet reactivity and fetal growth. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999;25:455–462. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferdinandusse S, Denis S, Dacremont G, Wanders RJ. Toxicity of peroxisomal C27-bile acid intermediates. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.11.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Takagi Y, Nikaido T, Toki T, et al. Levels of oxidative stress and redox-related molecules in the placenta in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Virchows Arch. 2004;444:49–55. doi: 10.1007/s00428-003-0903-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tranquilli AL, Bezzeccheri V, Giannubilo SR, Scagnoli C, Mazzanti L, Garzetti GG. Amniotic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nitric oxide (NO) in women with subsequent preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;113:17–20. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00369-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Madamanchi NR, Vendrov A, Runge MS. Oxidative stress and vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:29–38. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000150649.39934.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466:707–713. doi: 10.1038/nature09270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yuen RK, Penaherrera MS, von Dadelszen P, McFadden DE, Robinson WP. DNA methylation profiling of human placentas reveals promoter hypomethylation of multiple genes in early-onset preeclampsia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:1006–1012. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Friedmann E, Hauben E, Maylandt K, et al. SPPL2a and SPPL2b promote intramembrane proteolysis of TNFalpha in activated dendritic cells to trigger IL-12 production. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:843–848. doi: 10.1038/ncb1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fritz JH, Ferrero RL, Philpott DJ, Girardin SE. Nod-like proteins in immunity, inflammation and disease. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1250–1257. doi: 10.1038/ni1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Winn VD, Haimov-Kochman R, Paquet AC, et al. Gene expression profiling of the human maternal–fetal interface reveals dramatic changes between midgestation and term. Endocrinology. 2007;148:1059–1079. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113 (Suppl 3:17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Table S2

Articles from European Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES