Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2011 Jul 15;6(7):e22247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022247

Metabolic Versatility and Antibacterial Metabolite Biosynthesis Are Distinguishing Genomic Features of the Fire Blight Antagonist Pantoea vagans C9-1

Theo H M Smits 1, Fabio Rezzonico 1, Tim Kamber 1, Jochen Blom 2, Alexander Goesmann 2, Carol A Ishimaru 3, Jürg E Frey 1, Virginia O Stockwell 4, Brion Duffy 1,*
Editor: Jonathan H Badger5
PMCID: PMC3137637  PMID: 21789243

Abstract

Background

Pantoea vagans is a commercialized biological control agent used against the pome fruit bacterial disease fire blight, caused by Erwinia amylovora. Compared to other biocontrol agents, relatively little is currently known regarding Pantoea genetics. Better understanding of antagonist mechanisms of action and ecological fitness is critical to improving efficacy.

Principal Findings

Genome analysis indicated two major factors contribute to biocontrol activity: competition for limiting substrates and antibacterial metabolite production. Pathways for utilization of a broad diversity of sugars and acquisition of iron were identified. Metabolism of sorbitol by P. vagans C9-1 may be a major metabolic feature in biocontrol of fire blight. Biosynthetic genes for the antibacterial peptide pantocin A were found on a chromosomal 28-kb genomic island, and for dapdiamide E on the plasmid pPag2. There was no evidence of potential virulence factors that could enable an animal or phytopathogenic lifestyle and no indication of any genetic-based biosafety risk in the antagonist.

Conclusions

Identifying key determinants contributing to disease suppression allows the development of procedures to follow their expression in planta and the genome sequence contributes to rationale risk assessment regarding the use of the biocontrol strain in agricultural systems.

Introduction

Fire blight is the most important global threat to pome fruit production areas around the world and its causative agent, the enterobacterium Erwinia amylovora, can affect a wide variety of rosaceous plants [1]. During spring, the pathogen colonizes the stigmata of flowers and invades tissues through the nectaries, causing rapid necrosis and progressive wilt in infected branches. Epidemics can develop rapidly and result in death of individual plants or entire orchards within a single season, leading to severe economic losses [2]. E. amylovora has quarantine status outside North America, and it is a contentious trade issue with fruit movement into fire-blight-free countries such as Australia, Japan, and all countries of the Southern Hemisphere aside from New Zealand [3], [4]. This invasive pathogen has spread across Europe and the Middle East, and is threatening to advance into the region of origin of apple germplasm resources in Central Asia [5], adding to the urgency to develop more effective control and containment strategies. With the recent publication of the genomes of E. amylovora CFBP 1430 [6] and its close relative Erwinia pyrifoliae DSM 12163T [7], a solid knowledge base for the pathogen is present already.

Although fire blight is one of the most intensively studied bacterial plant diseases, the control of the disease is still not satisfactory [8]. The most effective control of fire blight was obtained with prophylactic applications of the antibiotic streptomycin on flowers. Unfortunately, resistant strains of E. amylovora have emerged in production areas where streptomycin is registered for use [9]. Biological control of the disease has been tested over the last decades as a valuable alternative [8]. Here, several modes of action have been described. First, competition for space and nutrients is one of the most common mechanisms [10]. Acidification of the habitat can also produce unfavorable conditions for pathogen multiplication [11]. Additionally, antibiotic production by the biological control agent can suppress growth of the pathogen [12], [13].

P. vagans strain C9-1 [14], [15], [16] is an important biocontrol agent against E. amylovora [8], [17] that is registered in the USA and Canada as BlightBan C9-1S (NuFarms America). Two Pantoea agglomerans strains (E325 and P10c) are also commercially marketed for fire blight control. An obstacle to wider approval of Pantoea for agricultural application as a biocontrol agent is the reporting of clinical isolates, typically with specious documentation and/or identification, within the same species as the biocontrol strains. As a result, European and other governmental regulators have categorized most Pantoea spp. as biosafety level 2 (BL-2) organisms (opportunistic pathogens). This qualification of Pantoea spp. as BL-2 organisms restricts beneficial uses much needed as alternatives to even more controversial products (e.g., antibiotics) or to fill gaps where no other protection options are available. Detailed analysis of the complete genome sequence of the P. vagans biocontrol strain C9-1 [18] offers an important foundation for demonstrating biosafety and moreover for elucidating traits that influence and can ultimately be harnessed to improve beneficial biocontrol performance.

Results

Metabolic versatility in carbon metabolism

Nutrient competition by depriving pathogens of necessary resources on flowers is an important mechanism of action for biocontrol strains [10], [19]. We evaluated the metabolic versatility of P. vagans C9-1 with Biolog GN2 and AN plates, and Biolog PM profiling (Supporting Information, Table S1). P. vagans C9-1 metabolized a wide range of carbohydrates, corresponding well with already published substrate ranges for this organism [14], [20]. Many PTS systems are found in the genome annotation [18], most of them encoding sugar phosphorylases and most of them in close association to sugar-converting enzymes (e.g., kinases, glucosidases, etc). Additionally, some families of MFS and ABC transporters are predicted to transport sugars. The complete pathways including uptake proteins for several of these sugars were identified, providing genetic bases for most substrates found to be catabolized with Biolog PM profiling (Supporting information, Table S1).

On pome fruit hosts that utilize sorbitol as a primary carbon transport and storage compound [21], metabolism of sorbitol may contribute to virulence of E. amylovora [22], [23]. The genome of P. vagans C9-1 encodes two gene clusters for sorbitol utilization on plasmid pPag2 [18], a feature that is absent in other P. vagans strains [14]. At the protein level, the pPag2-encoded genes are 71–95% identical to each other, and 53–88% identical to the proteins encoded by the sorbitol gene clusters of E. amylovora [6]. Growth of P. vagans C9-1 with sorbitol as sole carbon source was confirmed with the Biolog plates (Supporting Information, Table S1) and in liquid cultures [15], [20].

Biosynthesis of the antibiotic pantocin A

On the chromosome, a gene cluster (paaPABC) encoding the pantocin A biosynthesis and autoresistance genes [24], [25] was identified with 99–100% identity to those of P. agglomerans biocontrol strains Eh318 and Eh252 [26]. An antibiotic, previously called herbicolin O [17], with identical chemical characteristics as pantocin A is produced by P. vagans C9-1 (C.A. Ishimaru, personal communication). The genes within the paaPABC operon have a lower G+C content (40.5%) than the whole genome (55.1%), suggesting a horizontal gene transfer event as origin. This operon resides in a 28 kb genomic island (GI) that was identified by its lower G+C content (37.3%). One border of the GI was integrated in the N-terminal region of the mutS gene (Fig. 1). On the other border of the GI, a 52 bp repeat was found with high sequence identity to the N-terminus of mutS. The identified integrase was located adjacent to, but in the opposite direction of mutS. Within the GI, other mobile element-related genes were found (i.e., integrases, recombinases, relaxase, parB and repB), several of them inactivated by frame-shifts. The GI is absent in three other P. vagans strains (including the type strain, LMG 24199T) but is present in a few other Pantoea strains [15].

Figure 1. The 28-kb genomic island in the chromosome of P. vagans C9-1 containing the pantocin A biosynthetic genes and comparable genomic islands in other organisms.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Grey connectors show regions that are conserved between the different organisms, while identical colors of genes indicate genes encoding orthologous proteins. The left and right borders of the genomic islands are indicated.

Biosynthesis of the antibiotic dapdiamide E

P. vagans C9-1 was reported to produce a second antibiotic, called herbicolin I [17], but lately renamed dapdiamide E [27]. The chemical structure was described recently for P. agglomerans 48b/90 with the indication that P. vagans C9-1 also produced this compound [28], but the biosynthetic genes of this antibiotic were not identified. Dapdiamide E-deficient mutants were obtained using plasposon mutagenesis [29]. Plasmid rescue and sequencing of the insertion site in mutant CIR624 indicated that the insertion took place in a hypothetical gene, encoded on pPag2 in a cluster containing several predicted biosynthetic and hypothetical genes. Analysis of the insertions that are present in the proposed dapdiamide E biosynthetic cluster is underway [27].

Exopolysaccharide production

Biosynthetic genes for an O-antigen-type exopolysaccharide were found in the genome of P. vagans C9-1. The encoded proteins have between 78.5% and 93.4% protein sequence identity with the stewartan gene cluster of P. stewartii subsp. stewartii and share similar operon organization [30]. The biosynthetic clusters for the exopolysaccharide amylovoran of E. amylovora CFBP 1430 and E. pyrifoliae DSM 12163T that is involved in pathogenicity, are less related and deviate in the specific glycosyltransferases [6], [7], [31].

Production of the plant hormone indole acetic acid

The plant growth regulator indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is produced by some strains of P. agglomerans [32], [33]. We confirmed that P. vagans C9-1 produces IAA in liquid cultures. Based on the standard curve published by Lindow et al. [33], the concentrations produced by P. vagans C9-1 vary roughly between 5 and 10 mg l−1, in the same range as IAA produced by the P. agglomerans strains tested in their study. On the chromosome of P. vagans C9-1, a gene encoding the indole-3-pyruvate (IPyA) decarboxylase IpdC was identified. This protein is the key enzyme of the IPyA pathway in the biosynthesis of IAA [34] (Fig. 2). Another IAA biosynthetic pathway, the indole-3-acetamide pathway that involves tryptophan monooxygenase (Fig. 2), encoded on the plasmid pPATH from phytopathogenic P. agglomerans strains [35], [36], is absent in the genome of P. vagans C9-1. Additionally, plasmid pPag2 in P. vagans C9-1 carries a gene cluster for biosynthesis of IAA from plant-derived aldoximes [34]. The genes for an aldoxime dehydratase, amidase and nitrile hydratase were found in a single gene cluster, similar to the arrangement in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae [37].

Figure 2. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthetic pathways starting from L-tryptophan.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Top: aldoxime pathway; middle: indole-3-acetamide pathway; bottom: indole pyruvate pathway (IpyA). Locus tags are indicated for genes that could be identified. Dashed, crossed-out lines represent pathways that are absent in P. vagans C9-1.

Siderophore production

Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition is essential to overcome conditions of iron limitation encountered on floral tissues [38]. The pathogen E. amylovora utilizes desferrioxamine for iron acquisition and this siderophore is implicated in pathogenicity on rosaceous plants [39]. P. vagans C9-1 may compete with the pathogen for the iron on flowers by the biosynthesis of high-affinity siderophores.

P. vagans C9-1 produces both enterobactin and hydroxamate siderophores [40]. On the chromosome of P. vagans C9-1, a complete gene cluster for the production and export of an enterobactin-like siderophore is present. This feature is shared with many members of the Enterobacteriaceae [40], but a similar gene cluster is absent in the genomes of the related P. ananatis LMG 20103 [41] or all Erwinia species [6], [7].

Of the hydroxamate siderophores, desferrioxamine E is the major product of P. vagans C9-1, while smaller amounts of desferrioxamines D2 and B are produced [40], [42]. On plasmid pPag3, a gene cluster (dfoJACS) was found [43] that is related to the dfoJACS cluster of P. ananatis LMG 20103 [41] with the difference that the latter strain also encodes the TonB-dependent receptor FoxA directly downstream of dfoS. Lower sequence identities exist to the dfoJAC clusters of Erwinia spp. [6], [7] and to lesser extend to the desABCD biosynthetic gene cluster for desferrioxamine E in Streptomyces coelicolor M145 [44]. In P. vagans C9-1, the ferrioxamine receptor gene foxA is located on the chromosome.

A striking difference is the number of TonB-dependent siderophore receptors that are present in P. vagans C9-1 in comparison to the low number of these receptors in Erwinia spp. The genome of P. vagans C9-1 encodes 10 TonB-dependent receptors [18], whereas the Erwinia spp. only encode four [6], [7]. We postulate that P. vagans C9-1 may be a more effective competitor for iron compared to other Erwinia spp.

Type VI secretion systems

Two type VI secretion system (T6SS) gene clusters were identified in P. vagans C9-1. The T6SS cluster 1 has a similar gene organization as those in the closely related enterobacteria E. amylovora CFBP 1430 [6] and S. proteamaculans 568 (Fig. 3), but differs in the number of putative effector genes (i.e., hcp and vgrG). A third T3SS cluster as identified in the genomes of the related species P. ananatis LMG 20103 [41] and E. amylovora CFBP 1430 [6] was not observed.

Figure 3. Comparison of type VI secretion system (T6SS) cluster 1 of P. vagans C9-1 with comparable regions from Erwinia amylovora CFBP 1430 and Serratia proteamaculans 568.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Blocks of related genes are shaded grey. Putative core genes are colored green, putative effectors red, putative signal transducers black, conserved genes between clusters grey and genes without related or homologues in all other clusters white.

As several T6SSs have been identified in many pathogenic species (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia spp.), it has been hypothesized that they may play a role in host interactions and virulence [45], [46]. T6SSs are present in genome sequences of many non-pathogenic bacteria and studies on the role of T6SSs as a host-targeting virulence factor have yielded inconsistent data [47], [48]. A different role of T6SSs is being considered, that they are involved in inter-bacterial interactions [48]. As such, the T6SSs may impact biocontrol via direct contact between P. vagans C9-1 and E. amylovora. This role is currently under investigation (Kamber, Smits and Duffy, unpublished).

Resistance factors

Plasmid pPag2 contains a functional tellurite-resistance operon similar to that of E. coli O157:H7 isolates [49]. P. vagans C9-1 is resistant to tellurite at 50 µg ml−1 and single colony mutants appear at higher concentrations. Plasmid pPag3 encodes a β-lactamase Bla and its cognate regulator AmpR, [43] conferring P. vagans C9-1 resistance to ampicillin (200 µg ml−1). Additionally, at least 41 genes in the genome of P. vagans C9-1 encode putative MFS or DMT super-family multidrug exporters (19 proteins with Transport Classification database (TCDB, [50]) numbers TC 2.A.1.2.-, 9 TC 2.A.1.3.-, and 13 TC 2.A.7.-.-).

The commercialized product BlightBan C9-1S contains a spontaneous rifampicin- and streptomycin-resistant variant of the sequenced wild-type strain. Streptomycin resistance in this strain was identified to be conferred by a single A→G point mutation in the rpsL gene, yielding the known mutation K43R that leads to high resistance against the antibiotic. This is analogous to the position and extent of resistance found in streptomycin-resistant strains of E. amylovora [9].

Pathogenicity of P. vagans isolates on Eucalyptus species

The type strain of P. vagans and other initial strains of the species were isolated from Eucalyptus leaves showing symptoms of bacterial blight and dieback [14], but the species description did not state whether the strains are the causal agent of the disease. We tested pathogenicity of this species on seedlings of three Eucalyptus species. Symptoms of bacterial blight were not observed on Eucalyptus inoculated with P. vagans strains C9-1, LMG 24199T or LMG 24196; inoculated plants looked similar to water-treated controls. Necrotic lesions were observed on leaves of each Eucalyptus species inoculated with high doses of P. vagans strain LMG 24195 within 2 weeks after inoculation, but symptoms were not observed when strain LMG 24195 was introduced into petioles or leaves at a lower dose (1×106 CFU ml−1). Some strains of P. vagans, including C9-1, did not cause any disease symptoms and one strain caused minor symptoms, so pathogenicity towards plants among all strains of P. vagans should not be assumed based on isolation of the type strain from diseased tissues.

Comparative genomics to the related plant pathogen P. ananatis LMG 20103

Recently, the genome of the closely related plant pathogen P. ananatis LMG 20103 was published [41], [51]. The most obvious difference between genomes of P. vagans C9-1 and P. ananatis LMG 20103 is the absence of large plasmids in the latter strain, while the total genome size is comparable. The order on the chromosome is highly syntenic (Fig. 4), although many small, collinear blocks identified on the three plasmids of P. vagans C9-1 are scattered over the chromosome of P. ananatis LMG 20103. Notably, only one small collinear block was identified on plasmid pPag2, corresponding to the genes encoding sorbitol metabolism in P. ananatis LMG 20103 [15], [52].

Figure 4. Mauve alignment of the genomes of P. vagans C-1 and P. ananatis LMG 20103. Selected differential features are indicated.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Discussion

Biocontrol activity and genomics reveal main mechanisms

The genome sequence of P. vagans strain C9-1 [18] has allowed the identification of several factors that might be involved in biocontrol efficacy. As with most biocontrol agents, preemptive exclusion and nutrient competition with the pathogen for necessary resources are important mechanisms of action [10], [19]. The substrates utilized by P. vagans C9-1 include the known nectar sugars (e.g., glucose, sucrose and fructose) [53] and sorbitol, the major transport sugar in Rosaceae host plants [54], indicating that P. vagans C9-1 likely competes with E. amylovora for these substrates at colonization and infection sites [20]. An additional trait of P. vagans C9-1 is its production of a variety of antimicrobial metabolites that contribute to biocontrol efficacy, including siderophores and the antibiotics dapdiamide E and pantocin A [17], [24], [25]. Understanding the genetics behind biocontrol antibiotic biosynthesis may enable development of application and/or formulation strategies that optimize expression and preclude inhibition/degradation by co-inoculated or environmental bacteria [55], [56].

Plasmid pPag2: a plasmid contributing to biocontrol

The biocontrol features dapdiamide E biosynthesis and sorbitol metabolism are located on the P. vagans C9-1 plasmid pPag2. This plasmid is not present in the other P. vagans strains and was not detected in several P. agglomerans strains [43]. The plasmid itself contains several remnants of IS elements and has a mosaic structure. This plasmid could thus constitute a plasmid specific to the biocontrol strain. The other two plasmids of P. vagans C9-1 contain general metabolic features of P. vagans (e.g., maltose and sucrose utilization) [14] and those genes could be detected in other members of the species by PCR [43]. These plasmids can thus be regarded as indigenous to the species.

Environmental fitness

We have identified several factors that are involved in environmental fitness, like pigments, siderophores, acyl-homoserine lactones, IAA biosynthesis from aldoximes, tellurite resistance and exopolysaccharides [18], [43]. The pigment zeaxanthine diglucoside is produced by P. vagans C9-1 [57], giving it potential protection against reactive oxygen species that are produced during epiphytic growth on sunlight exposed plant surfaces [58]. The siderophores are involved in uptake of iron under conditions of iron limitation occurring on floral surfaces [38], [59], but the presence of numerous TonB receptors also allows competition with other organisms that have similar systems [60]. The biosynthesis of the high-affinity iron siderophore enterobactin and the ability to utilize an array of other iron siderophores not produced by the organism would give P. vagans C9-1 a strong competitive advantage over Erwinia spp., as the latter group of organisms is able only to synthesize the siderophore desferrioxamine and contains only a limited number of siderophore uptake systems [6], [7]. P. vagans C9-1 produces acyl-homoserine lactones [43], [61], a potential quorum-sensing regulation system that might be coupled to environmental fitness factors. The production of exopolysaccharides [30] can protect bacteria against environmental stress like desiccation.

Potential risk factors evaluated

P. vagans C9-1 and other P. vagans strains were evaluated for their pathogenicity against Eucalyptus plants. Typical symptoms of bacterial blight were not observed on several Eucalyptus species, we conclude that an association of P. vagans as the causal agent of bacterial blight of Eucalyptus [14] is not confirmed. In addition, P. vagans C9-1 is not pathogenic to pome fruit flowers and does not cause a hypersensitive response when infiltrated into tobacco leaves (V.O. Stockwell, personal communication). Additional virulence factors like the type III secretion systems (T3SS) and effectors of P. agglomerans pathovars gypsophilae or betae [36] were not identified on the chromosome. Essentially this confirms that P. vagans C9-1 is not a plant pathogen.

The close phylogenetic position of P. vagans to P. agglomerans generates problems when identifying this species using some commercial systems [14], [15], [16], [62]. The irregular, and often inaccurate, identification of isolates from clinical samples as “P. agglomerans” [15], [16] has resulted in both species being classified as BL-2 pathogens, even though clinical assumptions are never supported by attempts to fulfill Koch's postulates, and no evidence has ever been presented demonstrating toxicity, pathogenicity or allergenicity for either species [15]. We confirm that no known or putative genes involved in pathogenicity to animals, humans, plants or other organisms (e.g., T3SS, toxins) are found in the genome and there is no evidence that P. vagans C9-1 interacts with or persists in mammals (http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/biopesticides/ingredients/tech_docs/brad_006470.pdf). Several environmental organisms like E. amylovora or S. proteamaculans have orthologous gene clusters for the T6SSs of P. vagans C9-1 and its role is proposed to be involved in inter-bacterial interactions [48]. The presence of a non-transferable point-mutation conferring streptomycin resistance in the commercialized strain C9-1S allows the combinatorial treatment with the antibiotic without suppressing the growth of populations of P. vagans C9-1 on the treated plants [63].

Materials and Methods

Strains, media and growth conditions

Pantoea vagans C9-1 was isolated from stem tissue of a Malus×domestica ‘Jonathan’ in Michigan, USA [17] and evaluated over the past 20 years for biological control of fire blight [8]. A spontaneous streptomycin- and rifampicin-resistant mutant was approved and registered by the USA EPA in 2007 under the trade name BlightBan C9-1S (NuFarm Americas, Burr Ridge, IL, USA) in the USA and Canada. Additional P. vagans strains (LMG 24195, LMG 24196 and LMG 24199T) were obtained from T.A. Coutinho (FABI, University of Pretoria, South Africa). Bacteria were grown on LB medium [64] at 28°C. Catabolism assays were done in M9 minimal medium [64] supplemented with carbon sources (e.g., glucose, sorbitol, maltose or sucrose).

Metabolic profiling

The metabolic profile of P. vagans C9-1 was assayed using Biolog GN2 and AN plates. Pre-cultures were grown in M9 medium [64] with 5 mM glucose and allowed to grow to late stationary phase to ensure complete substrate utilization. The cells were washed once and re-suspended in fresh M9 medium. Attenuance at 600 nm (A600) was set to 0.15 per well, 100 µl of inoculum was added. The plates were visually interpreted after incubation for 1, 2 and 5 days at 28°C. Additional data on the metabolism of nutrient sources for P. vagans C9-1 were generated in replicate plates incubated at 22°C by the Biolog Phenotype Microarray Services (Hayward, CA, USA). Further information and comments on nutrient sources is provided in supporting information (Text S1).

Indole acetic acid biosynthesis assays

For production of indole acetic acid (IAA) by P. vagans strains, the method of Lindow et al. [33] was followed. Briefly, three replicate cultures per strain were grown in KB broth amended with 0.2 mg ml−1 L-tryptophan for 48 h at 27°C. Cultures were harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 14,000 rpm) and 1 ml culture supernatant was added to 2 ml of reagent (2% 0.5 M FeCl3 in 35% perchloric acid) [65]. The samples were incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and OD530 nm was measured. As reference, non-inoculated broth plus reagent was used. As controls for IAA production, cultures of a known IAA producer (P. agglomerans strain 299R) and known non-producers (Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 and Erwinia amylovora Ea153) were included. This experiment was conducted twice with similar results.

Pathogenicity tests on Eucalyptus

P. vagans strains C9-1, LMG 24199T, LMG 24195 and LMG 24196 were cultured for 2 days on LB agar at 27°C. Cells were removed from the surface of the agar and suspended in sterile distilled water; cell concentration was adjusted with a spectrophotometer. Eucalyptus grandis, E. gunnii and E. nitens plants were propagated from seeds kindly provided by Windmill Outback Nursery, VA, USA and maintained in a greenhouse. Leaves and petioles of five replicate 3-month old plants were inoculated with bacterial suspensions (1×106 and 1×108 CFU ml−1) by the methods of Coutinho et al. [66] and covered with plastic bags to maintain humid conditions. Additional plants were inoculated by cutting leaves transversely with scissors dipped in 1×109 CFU ml−1. Control plants for each method were treated with sterile water. Plants were examined for symptoms of bacterial blight (i.e., water-soaking, necrosis, wilt and/or leaf abscission) periodically over 3 weeks. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

Genome annotation, comparative genomics and metabolic reconstruction

Genes were predicted using a combined strategy [67] based on the CDS prediction programs Glimmer [68] and Critica [69]. Subsequently, the potential function of each predicted gene was automatically assigned using the GenDB annotation pipeline [70]. The resulting genome annotation was manually curated, and metabolic pathways were identified using the KEGG pathways tool [71] in GenDB. Transport proteins were classified according to the nomenclature in the Transporter Classification Database [50].

Routine sequence manipulations were done using the programs of the Lasergene package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). Whole-genome comparisons were done using the progressive alignment option of the Mauve comparison software (Version 2.0 [72]).

The genome sequence of P. vagans C9-1 was compared to those of P. ananatis LMG 20103 and E. amylovora CFBP 1430 to identify the set of common genes composing the core genome for this genus and the set of genes unique to each species, referred to as singletons. For this purpose, an “all-against-all” comparison of the genes was accomplished using the BLAST alignment tool [73]. The genes were aligned based on the protein sequence (BLASTP) with an initial e-value cut-off of 1E-5 using the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix. Genes were considered orthologous when a reciprocal best BLAST hit was found between two genes, and when both BLAST hits were based on alignments exceeding 70% sequence identity spanning over at least 70% of the query gene length [74]. The Pantoea genus core genome was calculated as the set of genes of a reference strain for which an orthologous gene could be found in each of the compared genomes. In contrast, genes of one strain were considered to be singleton genes when they had no BLAST-hits comparability with any of the other genomes that satisfied the given criteria [74].

Supporting Information

Table S1

Carbon sources for P. vagans C9-1, as determined with Biolog plates GN2, AN or the Biolog PM system plates PM1 and PM2A.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (114.5KB, doc)
Text S1

Further information and comments on nutritional sources and substrates.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (39KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We thank T.A. Coutinho (FABI, University of Pretoria, South Africa) for generously providing P. vagans LMG strains, and C. Pelludat and B. Frey (ACW) for helpful discussion and technical support.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: Financial support was provided by the Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture, the Swiss Secretariat for Education and Research (COST SBF C06.0069), and the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment. This work was conducted within the European Science Foundation supported research network COST Action 873 (www.cost873.ch). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Duffy B, Schärer H-J, Bünter M, Klay A, Holliger E. Regulatory measures against Erwinia amylovora in Switzerland. EPPO Bull. 2005;35:239–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonn WG, van der Zwet T. Distribution and economic importance of fire blight. In: Vanneste JL, editor. Fire Blight: The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2000. pp. 37–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Calvin L, Krissoff B. Technical barriers to trade: a case study of phytosanitary barriers and U.S.-Japanese apple trade. J Agric Res Econom. 1998;23:351–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roberts RG, Hale CN, van der Zwet T, Miller CE, Redlin SC. The potential for spread of Erwinia amylovora and fire blight via commercial apple fruit; a critical review and risk assessment. Crop Prot. 1998;17:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jock S, Donat V, López MM, Bazzi C, Geider K. Following spread of fire blight in Western, Central and Southern Europe by molecular differentiation of Erwinia amylovora strains with PFGE analysis. Environ Microbiol. 2002;4:106–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smits THM, Rezzonico F, Kamber T, Blom J, Goesmann A, et al. Complete genome sequence of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora CFBP 1430 and comparison to other Erwinia spp. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010;23:384–393. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smits THM, Jaenicke S, Rezzonico F, Kamber T, Goesmann A, et al. Complete genome sequence of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia pyrifoliae DSM 12163T and comparative genomic insights into plant pathogenicity. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson KB, Stockwell VO. Management of fire blight: a case study in microbial ecology. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36:227–248. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiou C-S, Jones AL. Molecular analysis of high-level streptomycin resistance in Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology. 1995;95:324–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wilson M, Lindow SE. Coexistence among epiphytic bacterial populations mediated through nutritional resource partitioning. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:4468–4477. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.12.4468-4477.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pusey PL, Stockwell VO, Rudell DR. Antibiosis and acidification by Pantoea agglomerans strain E325 may contribute to suppression of Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology. 2008;98:1136–1143. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-10-1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stockwell VO, Johnson KB, Sugar D, Loper JE. Antibiosis contributes to biological control of fire blight by Pantoea agglomerans strain Eh252 in orchards. Phytopathology. 2002;92:1202–1209. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.11.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vanneste JL, Yu J, Beer SV. Role of antibiotic production by Erwinia herbicola Eh252 in biological control of Erwinia amylovora. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:2785–2796. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.9.2785-2796.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brady CL, Venter SN, Cleenwerck I, Engelbeen K, Vancanneyt M, et al. Pantoea vagans sp. nov., Pantoea eucalypti sp. nov., Pantoea deleyi sp. nov. and Pantoea anthophila sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2339–2345. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.009241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rezzonico F, Smits THM, Montesinos E, Frey JE, Duffy B. Genotypic comparison of Pantoea agglomerans plant and clinical strains. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rezzonico F, Vogel G, Duffy B, Tonolla M. Whole cell MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry application for rapid identification and clustering analysis of Pantoea species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:4497–4509. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03112-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ishimaru CA, Klos EJ, Brubaker RR. Multiple antibiotic production by Erwinia herbicola. Phytopathology. 1988;78:746–750. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smits THM, Rezzonico F, Kamber T, Goesmann A, Ishimaru CA, et al. The genome sequence of the biocontrol agent Pantoea vagans strain C9-1. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:6486–6487. doi: 10.1128/JB.01122-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Poppe L, Vanhoutte S, Höfte M. Modes of action of Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2, an antagonist of postharvest pathogens on fruits. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2003;109:963–973. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stockwell VO, Johnson KB, Sugar D, Loper JE. Control of fire blight by Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 and Pantoea vagans C9-1 applied as single strains and mixed inocula. Phytopathology. 2010;100:1330–1339. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teo G, Suzuki Y, Uratsu SL, Lampinen B, Ormonde N, et al. Silencing leaf sorbitol synthesis alters long-distance partitioning and apple fruit quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18842–18847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605873103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aldridge P, Metzger M, Geider K. Genetics of sorbitol metabolism in Erwinia amylovora and its influence on bacterial virulence. Mol Gen Genet. 1997;256:611–619. doi: 10.1007/s004380050609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Duffy B, Dandekar AM. Sorbitol has no role in fire blight as demonstrated using transgenic apple with constitutively altered content. Acta Hort. 2008;793:279–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jin M, Liu L, Wright SAI, Beer SV, Clardy J. Structural and functional analysis of pantocin A: an antibiotic from Pantoea agglomerans discovered by heterologous expression of cloned genes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:2898–2901. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jin M, Wright SAI, Beer SV, Clardy J. The biosynthetic gene cluster of pantocin A provides insights into biosynthesis and a tool for screening. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:2902–2905. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vanneste JL, Yu J, Cornish DA. Presence of genes homologous to those necessary for synthesis of microcin MccEh252 in strains of Pantoea agglomerans. Acta Hort. 2008;793:391–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kamber T, Lansdell TA, Stockwell VO, Ishimaru CA, Smits THM, et al. Characterization of the antibacterial peptide herbicolin I biosythetic operon in Pantoea vagans biocontrol strain C9-1, prevalence among Pantoea species, and pathogen resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 doi: 10.1128/AEM.07351-11. submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sammer UF, Völksch B, Möllmann U, Schmidtke M, Spiteller P, et al. 2-Amino-3-(oxirane-2,3-dicarboxamido)-propanoyl-valine an effective peptide antibiotic from the epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans 48b/90. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7710–7717. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01244-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dennis JJ, Zylstra GJ. Plasposons: modular self-cloning minitransposon derivatives for rapid genetic analysis of Gram-negative bacterial genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2710–2715. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.7.2710-2715.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Coplin DL, Majerczak DR, Bugert P, Geider K. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the Erwinia stewartii cps gene cluster for synthesis of stewartan and comparison to the Erwinia amylovora ams cluster for synthesis of amylovoran. Acta Hort. 1996;411:251–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smits THM, Rezzonico F, Duffy B. Evolutionary insights from Erwinia amylovora genomics. J Biotechnol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.10.075. in press: doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.1010.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brandl MT, Lindow SE. Cloning and characterization of a locus encoding an indolepyruvate decarboxylase involved in indole-3-acetic acid synthesis in Erwinia herbicola. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:4121–4128. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4121-4128.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lindow SE, Desurmont C, Elkins R, McGourty G, Clark E, et al. Occurrence of indole-3-acetic acid-producing bacteria on pear trees and their association with fruit russet. Phytopathology. 1998;88:1149–1157. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.11.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007;31:425–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lichter A, Barash I, Valinsky L, Manulis S. The genes involved in cytokinin biosynthesis in Erwinia herbicola pv. gypsophilae: characterization and role in gall formation. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4457–4465. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.15.4457-4465.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barash I, Manulis-Sasson S. Recent evolution of bacterial pathogens: the gall-forming Pantoea agglomerans case. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009;47:133–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Feil H, Feil WS, Chain P, Larimer F, DiBartolo G, et al. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:11064–11069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504930102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Temple TN, Stockwell VO, Loper JE, Johnson KB. Bioavailability of iron to Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A506 on flowers of pear and apple. Phytopathology. 2004;94:1286–1294. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.12.1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dellagi A, Brisset M-N, Paulin J-P, Expert D. Dual role of desferrioxamine in Erwinia amylovora pathogenicity. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1998;11:734–742. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.8.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Feistner GJ, Ishimaru C. Proferrioxamine profiles of Erwinia herbicola and related bacteria. BioMetals. 1996;9:337–344. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.De Maayer P, Chan WY, Venter SN, Toth IK, Birch PRJ, et al. The genome sequence of Pantoea ananatis LMG20103, the causative agent of Eucalyptus blight and dieback. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:2936–2937. doi: 10.1128/JB.00060-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Berner I, Konetschny-Rapp S, Jung G, Winkelmann G. Characterization of ferrioxamine E as the principle siderophore of Erwinia herbicola (Enterobacter agglomerans). Biol Metals. 1988;1:51–56. doi: 10.1007/BF01128017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smits THM, Rezzonico F, Pelludat C, Goesmann A, Frey JE, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a non-pigmented variant of Pantoea vagans biocontrol strain C9-1 lacking the 530 kb megaplasmid pPag3. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;308:48–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Challis GL. A widely distributed bacterial pathway for siderophore biosynthesis independent of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. ChemBiochemistry. 2005;6:601–611. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200400283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bingle LEH, Bailey CM, Pallen MJ. Type VI secretion: a beginner's guide. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008;11:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cascales E. The type VI secretion toolkit. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:735–741. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jani AJ, Cotter PA. Type VI secretion: not just for pathogenesis anymore. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schwarz S, Hood RD, Mougous JD. What is type VI secretion doing in all those bugs? Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:531–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Taylor DE, Rooker M, Keelan M, Ng L-K, Martin I, et al. Genomic variability of O islands encoding tellurite resistance in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:4690–4698. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.17.4690-4698.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saier MH, Jr, Tran CV, Barabote RD. TCDB: The transporter classification database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucl Acids Res. 2006;34:D181–D186. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Coutinho TA, Venter SN. Pantoea ananatis: an unconventional plant pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10:325–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00542.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Grimont PAD, Grimont F. Genus XXIII. Pantoea. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology 2nd edition Volume 2: the Proteobacteria, part B: the Gammaproteobacteria. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 713–720. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pusey PL. Effect of nectar on microbial antagonists evaluated for use in control of fire blight of pome fruits. Phytopathology. 1999;89:39–46. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wallaart RAM. Distribution of sorbitol in Rosaceae. Phytochemistry. 1980;19:2603–2610. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anderson LM, Stockwell VO, Loper JE. An extracellular protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens inactivates antibiotics of Pantoea agglomerans. Phytopathology. 2004;94:1228–1234. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Duffy B, Schouten A, Raaijmakers JM. Pathogen self-defense: Mechanisms to counteract microbial antagonism. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:501–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sandmann G, Woods WS, Tuveson RW. Identification of carotenoids in Erwinia herbicola and in a transformed Escherichia coli strain. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;71:77–82. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(90)90035-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Armstrong GA, Hearst JE. Carotenoids 2: Genetics and molecular biology of carotenoid pigment biosynthesis. FASEB J. 1996;10:228–237. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.2.8641556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Expert D. Withholding and exchanging iron: interactions between Erwinia spp. and their host plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1999;37:307–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Deiss K, Hantke K, Winkelmann G. Molecular recognition of siderophores: a study with cloned ferrioxamine receptors (FoxA) from Erwinia herbicola and Yersinia enterocolitica. BioMetals. 1998;11:131–137. doi: 10.1023/a:1009230012577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chalupowicz L, Manulis-Sasson S, Itkin M, Sacher A, Sessa G, et al. Quorum-sensing system affects gall development incited by Pantoea agglomerans pv. gypsophilae. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008;21:1094–1105. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gavini F, Mergaert J, Beji A, Mielcarek C, Izard D, et al. Transfer of Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Ewing and Fife 1972 to Pantoea gen. nov. as Pantoea agglomerans comb. nov. and description of Pantoea dispersa sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:337–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stockwell VO, Johnson KB, Loper JE. Compatibility of bacterial antagonists of Erwinia amylovora with antibiotics used to control fire blight. Phytopathology. 1996;86:834–840. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd Ed.; In: Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, editors. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gordon SA, Weber RP. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 1951;26:192–195. doi: 10.1104/pp.26.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Coutinho TA, Preisig O, Mergaert J, Cnockaert MC, Riedel K-H, et al. Bacterial blight and dieback of Eucalyptus species, hybrids and clones in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2002;86:20–25. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McHardy AC, Goesmann A, Pühler A, Meyer F. Development of joint application strategies for two microbial gene finders. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1622–1631. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucl Acids Res. 1998;26:544–548. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.2.544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Badger JH, Olsen GJ. CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:512–524. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, et al. GenDB - an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucl Acids Res. 2003;31:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Nakaya A. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucl Acids Res. 2002;30:42–46. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Blom J, Albaum SP, Doppmeier D, Pühler A, Vorhölter F-J, et al. EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Carbon sources for P. vagans C9-1, as determined with Biolog plates GN2, AN or the Biolog PM system plates PM1 and PM2A.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (114.5KB, doc)
Text S1

Further information and comments on nutritional sources and substrates.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (39KB, doc)

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES