Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 7;152(8):3172–3181. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1001

Table 1.

EPM behavior

Experiment 1
Experiment 2
Cont (n = 11) SB (n = 12) WT Cont (n = 8) WT SB (n = 6) ERαKO Cont (n = 6) ERαKO SB (n = 4)
Open arm time (sec) 21.2 ± 4.9 23.4 ± 4.4 15.9 ± 4.0 24.8 ± 10.0 26.6 ± 13.1 15.3 ± 6.8
Closed arm time (sec) 178 ± 10.7 199 ± 9.6 199 ± 5.4 186 ± 23.4 173 ± 27.5 170 ± 18.6
Center time (sec) 100 ± 8.7 77.8 ± 6.2a 84.9 ± 3.3 89.3 ± 17.8 100 ± 19.0 115 ± 15.9
Total arm entries 18.2 ± 1.4 18.9 ± 1.3 17.6 ± 0.6 14.8 ± 3.7 15.7 ± 2.0 15.5 ± 2.7

Mean ± sem behavioral data collected the day after the last sex behavior trial, females from experiments 1 and 2. Females were tested in the EPM for 5 min. In experiment 1, SB-treated females were compared with controls. In experiment 2, WT and ERαKO females both treated (SB) and not treated (Cont) were compared (four groups: WT Cont, WT SB, ERαKO Cont, and ERαKO SB). Total arm entries represent locomotor activity (open arm + closed arm entries). n, Number of females in each treatment group. Cont, Control.

a

Significantly different from controls (P < 0.05).