Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Oncology
. 2011 Jun 20;29(21):2897–2903. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8540

Chronic Immune Stimulation Might Act As a Trigger for the Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Sigurdur Y Kristinsson 1,, Magnus Björkholm 1, Malin Hultcrantz 1, Åsa R Derolf 1, Ola Landgren 1, Lynn R Goldin 1
PMCID: PMC3138717  PMID: 21690473

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) often present with infections, but there are little data to assess whether a personal history of selected infections may act as pathogenic triggers. To additionally expand our knowledge on the role of immune stimulation in the causation of AML and MDS, we have conducted a large, population-based study to evaluate the risk of AML and MDS associated with a prior history of a broad range of infections or autoimmune diseases.

Patients and Methods

By using population-based central registries in Sweden, we included 9,219 patients with AML, 1,662 patients with MDS, and 42,878 matched controls. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the association of AML or MDS with infectious and/or autoimmune diseases.

Results

Overall, a history of any infectious disease was associated with a significantly increased risk of both AML (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.4) and MDS (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5). These associations were significant even when we limited infections to those occurring 3 or more years before AML/MDS. A previous history of any autoimmune disease was associated with a 1.7-fold (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.9) increased risk for AML and 2.1-fold (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.6) increased risk for MDS. A large range of conditions were each significantly associated with AML and MDS.

Conclusion

Our novel findings indicate that chronic immune stimulation acts as a trigger for AML/MDS development. The underlying mechanisms may also be due to a common genetic predisposition or an effect of treatment for infections/autoimmune conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly fatal malignancy, with approximately 10% to 15% 5-year survival in patients age 60 years and older.1,2 Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) includes a range of hematologic conditions united by ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk of transformation to AML.3

Prior case reports and smaller studies suggest that ionizing radiation and certain chemicals (eg, benzene) may play important roles in the development of AML and MDS.46 Also, patients treated with chemotherapy as a result of other malignancies have a higher risk of MDS and AML.1,7, 8 Furthermore, patients with certain diseases/syndromes (eg, myeloproliferative neoplasms [MPNs] and Down syndrome) have a propensity to develop AML and MDS.911 However, the majority of patients with AML/MDS have no history of any known risk factor.

Despite the severe infections in patients with AML at presentation, there are little data to assess whether preceding infections may play a plausible role in the causation of AML. In one study that included 624 patients with AML, a weak association with common childhood viral disease was found, but no other immune-related condition was associated.12 Furthermore, in a study with results that were based on 236 patients, a significantly increased risk for AML was observed in patients with previous tuberculosis, whereas various other types of infections and chronic conditions were not associated with an excess risk.13

To increase our understanding on the role of immune-related, infectious, and inflammatory conditions in the development of AML and MDS, we conducted a large, population-based, case-control study by use of linked registry data from Sweden that included 9,219 patients with AML, 1,662 patients with MDS, and 42,878 population-based controls. We evaluated the association between a prior personal history of infections and a broad range of autoimmune diseases and the development of AML and MDS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Registries, Patients, and Control Participants

Details of the study populations have been described previously.2,14 In brief, Sweden provides universal medical health care for the entire population, which is currently just over 9 million people. Patients with AML and MDS in Sweden are typically diagnosed, treated, and observed clinically by physicians at hospital-based hematology units.

Since 1958, all physicians, pathologists, and cytologists in Sweden are obliged by law to report each occurrences of cancer that they diagnose or treat to the centralized, nationwide Swedish Cancer Registry.15 In a recent validation study, we found the overall completeness and diagnostic accuracy of the Registry to be greater than 90%.16 From the Cancer Registry, we identified all patients with AML who were diagnosed from January 1, 1965, through December 31, 2004, and all patients with MDS who were diagnosed from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 2004. To minimize risk for bias in this study, we excluded patients with another cancer diagnosed before their AML or MDS diagnoses.

For each patient with AML and MDS, four population-based control participants (matched by sex, year of birth, and county of residence) were chosen randomly from the Swedish Population database. All control participants had to be alive at the time of AML/MDS diagnosis for the corresponding case patient and had to be without a hematologic malignancy diagnosed before the date of AML/MDS diagnosis for their corresponding case patient.

Information on occurrence and date of infections and autoimmune diseases was obtained from the Inpatient Registry (established in 1964). The seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases were used to code diagnoses of specific infectious and autoimmune diseases. Conditions included in the analyses were in accord with previously published studies.1719 The condition did not have to be that for which the patient was admitted, it only had to be in the list for a hospitalization episode. In accord with previous studies,20 autoimmune conditions were categorized according to those that generally have detectable autoantibodies and those that do not. Here, we present results for individual immune stimulatory conditions only if three or more people with the condition developed AML or MDS.

Statistical Analysis

We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the association of AML or MDS with infectious and/or autoimmune diseases by adjusting for year of birth (categorized into quartiles), year of patient diagnosis (categorized into quartiles), and sex. To avoid detection bias, we excluded the first year before AML/MDS diagnosis from the analyses. To evaluate the possibility that undetected AML/MDS could cause immune-related and/or infectious conditions (ie, reverse causality), we also analyzed infectious and autoimmune conditions that were diagnosed at least 3 years before AML/MDS. The occurrence of multiple different infectious or autoimmune disease diagnoses in the same individual were each counted in the analyses, but we assessed the possible differential effect as a result of multiple diagnoses occurring in the same individual. We analyzed the case-control difference in the occurrence of multiple conditions and conducted sensitivity analyses by removing patients and controls with multiple conditions from the analysis. Stratified analyses that were based on AML and MDS subtype were not performed because of the small numbers in each category. We also stratified results on the basis of age of diagnosis of AML and looked at patients diagnosed when younger than age 65 years and younger than age 40 years. When discussing significance levels, we refer to nominal P values.

RESULTS

A total of 9,219 patients with primary AML and 1,662 patients with primary MDS, as well as the 36,389 and 6,489 population-based controls, respectively, were included in the study. As listed in Table 1, 52.8% of the patients with AML and 54.9% of the patients with MDS were men, and the median ages at diagnoses were 68 years and 76 years for AML and MDS, respectively.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Patients With AML and MDS and Matched Control Participants

Variable AML
MDS
Patients(n = 9,219)
Controls(n = 36,389) Patients(n = 1,662)
Controls(n = 6,489)
No. % No. %
Median age at diagnosis, years 68 76
% male 52.8 53.0 54.9 54.9
Age group, years
    < 40 1,262 13.7 33 2.0
    40-49 704 7.6 30 1.8
    50-59 1,057 11.5 102 6.1
    60-69 1,978 21.5 266 16.0
    70-79 2,609 28.3 639 38.5
    ≥ 80 1,609 17.4 592 35.6
Year of diagnosis
    Before 1990 5,257 57.0 0
    1990-1994 1,487 16.1 250 15.0
    1995-2000 1,236 13.4 719 43.3
    After 2000 1,239 13.5 693 41.7

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome.

Infections and Risk of AML and MDS

Overall, a history of any infectious disease was associated with a 1.3-fold significantly increased risk of AML (Table 2). A broad range of infections were significantly associated with risk of AML, including pneumonia, tuberculosis, intestinal infections, septicemia, hepatitis C, pyelonephritis, sinusitis, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, meningitis, cytomegalovirus infection, and cellulitis. In latency analyses (ie, of infections 3 or more years before AML), many of these infections remained significantly associated with AML.

Table 2.

Personal History of Infections and Risk of AML

Category or Condition Participants
Latency More Than 3 Years Before AML Diagnosis
No. of AML Occurrences (n = 9,468) No. of Controls (n = 37,384) OR CI No. of AML Occurrences No. of Controls OR CI
Any infection 749 2,309 1.3 1.2 to 1.4 565 1,846 1.2 1.1 to 1.3
Pneumonia 251 768 1.3 1.1 to 1.5 185 560 1.3 1.1 to 1.5
Tuberculosis 59 132 1.8 1.2 to 2.4 41 111 1.5 1.0 to 2.1
Influenza 29 90 1.3 0.8 to 1.9 24 74 1.3 0.8 to 2.0
Intestinal infection 120 384 1.2 1.0 to 1.5 88 308 1.1 0.9 to 1.4
Septicemia 45 114 1.6 1.1 to 2.2 17 82 0.8 0.5 to 1.4
Herpes simplex 7 18 1.5 0.6 to 3.7 5 16 1.2 0.5 to 3.4
Herpes zoster 24 85 1.1 0.7 to 1.7 20 63 1.2 0.8 to 2.1
Hepatitis C 7 7 4.0 1.4 to 11.4 7 7 4.0 1.4 to 11.4
Infectious mononucleosis 3 12 1.0 0.3 to 3.5 2 11 0.7 0.2 to 3.3
Pyelonephritis 66 163 1.6 1.2 to 2.1 48 131 1.4 1.0 to 2.0
Cystitis 78 291 1.1 0.8 to 1.4 54 203 1.0 0.8 to 1.4
Gonorrhea 4 20 0.8 0.3 to 2.3 3 20 0.6 0.2 to 2.0
Syphilis 4 15 1.1 0.4 to 3.2 3 12 1.0 0.3 to 3.5
Sinusitis 33 68 1.9 1.3 to 2.9 26 58 1.8 1.1 to 2.8
Otitis media 42 173 1.0 0.7 to 1.4 30 151 0.8 0.5 to 1.2
Nasopharyngitis 38 98 1.5 1.1 to 2.2 31 87 1.4 0.9 to 2.1
Upper respiratory tract infection 116 352 1.3 1.1 to 1.6 90 308 1.2 0.9 to 1.5
Encephalitis 3 19 0.6 0.2 to 2.1 3 14 0.9 0.3 to 3.0
Meningitis 13 26 2.0 1.0 to 3.9 9 22 1.6 0.8 to 3.5
Lyme disease 4 48 0.3 0.1 to 0.9 4 48 0.3 0.1 to 0.9
Myocarditis 5 25 0.8 0.3 to 2.1 5 22 0.9 0.3 to 2.4
Osteomyelitis 13 43 1.2 0.6 to 2.2 10 36 1.1 0.5 to 2.2
Cytomegalovirus 7 5 5.6 1.8 to 17.5 6 3 7.9 2.0 to 31.6
Tonsillitis 23 74 1.2 0.8 to 2.0 17 61 1.1 0.6 to 1.9
Cellulitis 99 249 1.6 1.2 to 2.0 62 197 1.2 0.9 to 1.7
Empyema 3 9 1.3 0.4 to 4.9 2 8 1.0 0.2 to 4.6

NOTE. ORs were adjusted for categoric year of birth, date of diagnosis, sex, and county. Overall categories total to less than the sum of the individual categories because some individuals have more than one autoimmune disease.

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; OR, odds ratio.

The results for MDS are listed in Table 3. As with AML, a history of any infection was associated with a 1.3-fold significantly increased risk of MDS and remained significant in the 3-year latency analysis. However, fewer individual subgroups of infections were associated with MDS. We analyzed primary AML occurrences that were diagnosed in patients younger than age 65 years and younger than age 40 years, and we found that the overall patterns of increased risks as a result of any infection were similar in these younger age groups (data not shown).

Table 3.

Personal History of Infections and Risk of MDS

Category or Condition Participants
Latency 3 Years Before MDS Diagnosis
No. of MDS Occurrences (n = 1,662) No. of Controls (n = 6,489) OR CI No. of Occurrences No. of Controls OR CI
Any infection 224 684 1.3 1.1 to 1.5 182 536 1.4 1.1 to 1.6
Pneumonia 85 255 1.3 1.0 to 1.7 61 188 1.3 1.0 to 1.7
Tuberculosis 10 35 1.1 0.6 to 2.3 10 31 1.3 0.6 to 2.6
Influenza 9 33 1.1 0.5 to 2.2 7 25 1.1 0.5 to 2.5
Intestinal infection 35 110 1.2 0.9 to 1.8 29 91 1.2 0.8 to 1.9
Septicemia 13 46 1.1 0.6 to 2.1 7 28 1.0 0.4 to 2.2
Herpes simplex 4 5 3.1 0.8 to 11.6 3 4 2.9 0.7 to 13.1
Herpes zoster 12 30 1.6 0.8 to 3.1 11 20 2.1 1.0 to 4.5
Pyelonephritis 25 66 1.5 0.9 to 2.4 18 52 1.4 0.8 to 2.3
Cystitis 30 97 1.2 0.8 to 1.8 22 62 1.4 0.9 to 2.3
Sinusitis 5 18 1.1 0.4 to 2.9 3 13 0.9 0.3 to 3.2
Otitis media 13 37 1.4 0.7 to 2.6 12 33 1.4 0.7 to 2.8
Nasopharyngitis 6 20 1.2 0.5 to 2.9 3 16 0.7 0.2 to 2.5
Upper respiratory tract infection 25 84 1.2 0.8 to 1.8 19 69 1.1 0.7 to 1.8
Encephalitis 3 5 2.4 0.6 to 10.0 3 4 3.0 0.7 to 13.3
Meningitis 4 4 3.9 1.0 to 15.7 4 4 3.9 1.0 to 15.7
Osteomyelitis 7 13 2.1 0.8 to 5.3 7 12 2.3 0.9 to 5.8
Cellulitis 37 87 1.7 1.1 to 2.5 29 69 1.7 1.1 to 2.6
Empyema 3 4 2.9 0.7 to 13.1 3 3 3.9 0.8 to 19.4

NOTE. ORs were adjusted for categoric year of birth, date of diagnosis, sex, and county. Overall categories total to less than the sum of the individual categories because some individuals have more than one autoimmune disease.

Abbreviations: MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; OR, odds ratio.

Autoimmune Disease and Risk of AML and MDS

Associations between an autoimmune disease and AML are listed in Table 4. A total of 359 patients had a history of any autoimmune disease before their AML diagnoses, and the risk of AML for total autoimmune disease was 1.7-fold significantly increased. Furthermore, a significantly increased risk of AML was observed among patients with a history of each of the three categories of autoimmune diseases tested, including systemic, any autoimmune disease with organ involvement, and autoimmune disease without detectable antibodies. A broad range of conditions were each significantly associated with a later diagnosis of AML, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, pernicious anemia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, aplastic anemia, and psoriasis. When we evaluated risk for AML by latency (time between autoimmune disease and AML), the increased AML risk remained statistically significant at more than 3 years of latency among patients with all the three categories—any previous autoimmune disease, any autoimmune disease with organ involvement, any autoimmune disease without detectable autoantibodies—as well as many of the individual conditions (Table 4).

Table 4.

Personal History of Autoimmune Disease and Risk of AML

Category or Condition Participants
Latency More Than 3 Years Before AML Diagnosis
No. of AML Occurrences (n = 9,468) No. of Controls (n = 37,384) OR CI No. of AML Occurrences No. of Controls OR CI
Total autoimmune disease 359 861 1.7 1.5 to 1.9 251 691 1.4 1.3 to 1.7
Systemic involvement 116 320 1.4 1.2 to 1.8 82 269 1.2 0.9 to 1.5
    Rheumatoid arthritis 102 292 1.4 1.1 to 1.7 70 241 1.1 0.9 to 1.5
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 11 20 2.2 1.0 to 4.5 10 19 2.1 1.0 to 4.5
    Systemic sclerosis 6 12 2.0 0.7 to 5.2 4 10 1.6 0.5 to 5.0
    Sjögren's syndrome 5 10 2.0 0.7 to 5.7 4 10 1.6 0.5 to 5.0
Organ involvement 116 301 1.5 1.2 to 1.9 85 233 1.4 1.1 to 1.9
    Hashimoto's thyroiditis 6 6 3.9 1.3 to 12.1 6 6 3.9 1.3 to 12.1
    Graves' disease 5 37 0.5 0.2 to 1.4 4 30 0.5 0.2 to 1.5
    Addison's disease 4 13 1.2 0.4 to 3.7 2 9 0.9 0.2 to 4.0
    Pernicious anemia 29 74 1.5 1.0 to 2.4 18 53 1.3 0.8 to 2.3
    Autoimmune hemolytic anemia 11 3 14.4 4.0 to 51.5 9 3 11.7 3.2 to 43.3
    Immune thrombocytopenic purpura 7 7 4.0 1.4 to 11.3 4 5 3.2 0.9 to 11.8
    Primary biliary cirrhosis 3 13 0.9 0.3 to 3.2 2 11 0.7 0.2 to 3.2
    Polyarteritis nodosa 4 1 15.7 1.8 to 140.4 4 1 15.7 1.8 to 140.4
    Diabetes type I 5 11 1.8 0.6 to 5.2 5 9 2.2 0.8 to 6.7
    Wegener's granulomatosis 6 1 23.8 2.9 to 197.5 6 1 23.8 2.9 to 197.5
    Chronic rheumatic heart disease 20 71 1.1 0.7 to 1.8 12 58 0.8 0.4 to 1.5
    Multiple sclerosis 8 30 1.1 0.5 to 2.3 7 27 1.0 0.5 to 2.3
Autoantibodies not detectable 161 293 2.2 1.8 to 2.7 107 230 1.9 1.5 to 2.3
    Rheumatic fever 7 11 2.5 1.0 to 6.5 5 9 2.2 0.7 to 6.6
    Sarcoidosis 18 42 1.7 1.0 to 2.9 12 36 1.3 0.7 to 2.5
    Crohn's disease 11 44 1.0 0.5 to 1.9 7 33 0.8 0.4 to 1.9
    Ulcerative colitis 11 56 0.8 0.4 to 1.5 9 45 0.8 0.4 to 1.6
    Ankylosing spondylitis 8 18 1.8 0.8 to 4.1 8 14 2.3 1.0 to 5.4
    Polymyalgia rheumatic 55 54 4.0 2.8 to 5.9 36 36 3.9 2.5 to 6.3
    Psoriasis 27 64 1.7 1.1 to 2.6 21 57 1.5 0.9 to 2.4
    Giant cell arteritis 15 6 9.8 3.8 to 25.3 9 2 17.6 3.8 to 81.6
    Aplastic anemia 22 9 9.7 4.5 to 21.0 6 5 4.8 1.5 to 15.6

NOTE. ORs were adjusted for categoric year of birth, date of diagnosis, sex, and county. When presented in square brackets, two-sided P values that were based on Fisher's exact test were given when no patient or control had the specified condition. Overall categories total to less than the sum of the individual categories because some individuals have more than one autoimmune disease.

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; OR, odds ratio.

The results for MDS were similar to those for AML despite the smaller number of patients (Table 5). Overall, a history of any autoimmune disease was associated with a two-fold significantly increased risk of MDS. In addition, each of the large categories of autoimmune diseases was significantly associated with subsequent MDS as well as many of the individual conditions. As with AML, many of the significant associations remained significant even after limiting the comparison to those who had autoimmune diseases 3 or more years before MDS.

Table 5.

Personal History of Autoimmune Disease and Risk of MDS

Category or Condition Participants
Latency 3 Years Before MDS Diagnosis
No. of MDS Occurrences (n = 1,662) No. of Controls (n = 6,489) OR CI No. of Occurrences No. of Controls OR CI
Total autoimmune disease 133 263 2.1 1.7 to 2.6 91 220 1.7 1.3 to 2.1
Systemic involvement 40 93 1.7 1.2 to 2.5 33 81 1.6 1.1 to 2.4
    Rheumatoid arthritis 36 82 1.7 1.2 to 2.6 29 82 1.6 1.0 to 2.4
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 4 4 3.9 1.0 to 15.6 3 4 2.9 0.7 to 13.1
    Sjögren's syndrome 3 3 3.9 0.8 to 19.4 3 1 11.7 1.2 to 112.9
Organ involvement 39 85 1.8 1.2 to 2.7 23 70 1.3 0.8 to 2.1
    Pernicious anemia 10 22 1.8 0.8 to 3.7 2 19 0.4 0.1 to 1.7
    Autoimmune hemolytic anemia 3 0 P = .008 1 0 P = .204
    Immune thrombocytopenic purpura 6 1 23.9 2.9 to 198.4 1 1 3.9 0.3 to 62.9
    Myasthenia gravis 4 2 7.9 1.4 to 42.9 4 1 15.9 1.8 to 142.1
    Polyarteritis nodosa 2 0 P = .0 2 0 P = .04
    Celiac disease 3 5 2.4 0.6 to 9.9 3 4 3.0 0.7 to 13.2
    Wegener's granulomatosis 4 0 P = .002 4 0 P = .002
    Chronic rheumatic heart disease 5 18 1.1 0.4 to 2.9 4 15 1.0 0.3 to 3.1
Autoantibodies not detectable 62 107 2.3 1.7 to 3.2 40 87 1.8 1.3 to 2.7
    Sarcoidosis 3 12 1.0 0.3 to 3.5 2 12 0.7 0.2 to 2.9
    Crohn's disease 3 8 1.5 0.4 to 5.7 2 8 1.0 0.2 to 4.7
    Ulcerative colitis 7 18 1.5 0.6 to 3.7 6 15 1.6 0.6 to 4.1
    Polymyalgia rheumatica 18 36 2.0 1.1 to 3.5 11 24 1.8 0.9 to 3.7
    Psoriasis 13 25 2.0 1.0 to 4.0 12 23 2.1 1.0 to 4.1
    Giant cell arteritis 7 5 5.4 1.7 to 17.1 5 2 9.7 1.9 to 49.9
    Aplastic anemia 11 4 10.8 3.4 to 34.0 1 1 4.0 0.3 to 63.7

NOTE. ORs were adjusted for categoric year of birth, date of diagnosis, sex, and county. When presented in square brackets, two-sided P values that were based on Fisher's exact test were given when no patient or control had the specified condition. Overall categories total to less than the sum of the individual categories because some individuals have more than one autoimmune disease.

Abbreviations: MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; OR, odds ratio.

We also analyzed primary AML occurrences in patients diagnosed when younger than age 65 years and younger than age 40 years and found that the overall patterns of increased risk as a result of the broad categories of autoimmune diseases were similar in these younger age groups (data not shown).

Multiple Infections and Autoimmune Conditions

We compared the distribution of numbers of different infections and autoimmune conditions in patients and controls. For infections, there were slightly more patients than controls that had three or more different infections with borderline significance (P = .052). In the case of autoimmune diseases, there were slightly more patients with multiple conditions than controls, but the difference was not significant (not shown). If we eliminated patients and controls with the highest number of conditions, the results changed little (data not shown). Finally, in a logistic model allowing for the variable of any autoimmune condition and the variable of any infection, both the variable of any infection (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.4) and the variable of any autoimmune condition (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.8) were highly significant, which indicates that these are independent risk factors that contribute to the risk of AML.

DISCUSSION

For the first time to our knowledge, in a population-based setting with a sample of more than 9,000 patients with primary AML, more than 1,500 patients with primary MDS, and approximately 43,000 matched controls, we found a personal history of any infection as well as a broad range of specific infections to increase the risk of both AML and MDS. Specifically, AML was associated with prior pneumonia, tuberculosis, intestinal infections, septicemia, hepatitis C, pyelonephritis, sinusitis, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, meningitis, cytomegalovirus infection, and cellulitis. MDS was increased among patients with previous pneumonia and cellulitis. There are little data in the literature on the role of infections in the etiology of AML.12,13 In review articles, the general conclusion is that there is either no association or that there are insufficient data.21,22 The mechanisms for an increased risk for AML and MDS among patients with a previous infection are not clear but may involve an underlying immune dysfunction that could also predispose to AML/MDS. Alternatively, infections/host responses could induce early leukemogeneic events. These novel findings need to be verified in other studies, for example in large cohorts of patients with chronic immune stimulation disease. However, we and others have reported similar findings in certain lymphoid malignancies.23,24

We also found a significantly increased risk of AML and MDS associated with a prior history of autoimmune disease. We found that a personal history of rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Wegener's granulomatosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, psoriasis, and aplastic anemia increased the risk of both AML and MDS. The risk for AML increased by 70% in patients who had any autoimmune disease. The highest risks were observed in patients with prior Wegener's granulomatosis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, polyarteritis nodosa, giant cell arteritis, and aplastic anemia; however, for some of these conditions, the numbers of patients were small. In MDS, the risk increased two-fold in patients with any autoimmune disease. Many of our findings are consistent with a study that was based on the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) –Medicare database, which included patients with primary and secondary AML and MDS age 67 years or older.25 The associations that we observed with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Wegener's granulomatosis, psoriasis, giant cell arteritis, and aplastic anemia have not been previously reported. Some of these conditions have not been previously associated with an increased risk of cancer. We recently showed, in a study that included 11,039 patients with MPN, that a previous autoimmune disease was associated with a 20% increased risk of MPN. Specifically, there was a significantly increased risk in patients with prior immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Crohn's disease, polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, Reiter's syndrome, and aplastic anemia.14 This suggests that some of these conditions cause susceptibility to multiple myeloid malignancies. In addition, aplastic anemia is associated with an increased risk for MDS, leukemias, and some solid tumors.26 Also consistent with our results, an increased risk of AML after immune thrombocytopenic purpura and autoimmune hemolytic anemia,27 as well as after rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis, was found in two Swedish studies.28 Consistent with the SEER study,25 we found that rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased risk of MDS, but we found a nonsignificantly increased risk associated with pernicious anemia. In another small study (n = 84), an association between total autoimmune diseases and MDS was observed.29

A possible explanation for the observed associations between infectious and autoimmune conditions and risk of AML/MDS is that these diseases are premalignant manifestations that are caused by the immune disruption that precedes the development of AML/MDS. There are case reports that show co-occurrence of autoimmune diseases and AML/MDS.30,31 However, because of the acute nature of primary AML, and because many of the risks were still significantly elevated more than 3 years before AML/MDS diagnosis, the premalignant explanation is not likely. We cannot entirely rule out that infection and autoimmunity are markers for an immune disruption that is an early part of the leukemogenic process. Clearly, these possibilities need additional investigation.

Our findings may be important for several reasons. Potentially, the underlying explanations for our findings may reflect the immune-related or inflammation-driven tumorigenesis from autoimmune conditions that leads to AML or MDS. Alternatively, the treatments given to patients with autoimmune disease (eg, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory agents, and immunosuppressive agents) might play a role for the risk of AML and MDS. Also, there might be shared common genetic and/or environmental susceptibility in autoimmune diseases and AML and MDS.

Our study has several strengths, including its large size, which allowed assessment of a broad range of infectious and immune-related conditions, and high-quality data from Sweden in a stable population with access to standardized universal medical health care during the entire study period. Furthermore, the use of the nationwide, register-based, case-control design ruled out recall bias and ensured a population-based setting and generalizability of our findings. One could argue that AML and MDS are heterogeneous diseases, with age at diagnosis as one source of heterogeneity. In the population, AML incidence rates start to increase dramatically after age 40 years. However, our findings were consistent even in the youngest patients with AML/MDS (ie, those diagnosed before 40 years of age).

Limitations of our study include lack of clinical data, lack of validation of individual medical records, lack of information on potential confounders (although the study design ensured adjustment for sex, age, and geography), treatment, and absence of a systematic blinded validation of all AML/MDS diagnoses. Also, because of the nature of this hypothesis-generating study, one has to interpret our findings with caution because of the many immune-related conditions assessed. Although our study is large, some associations were based on small numbers. The use of inpatient data would be expected to lead to under-ascertainment of less severe forms of chronic immune-related conditions. Thus, our findings may apply mainly to severe forms of immune-related conditions. However, we also captured finding even if these conditions were not the primary diagnoses. Also, because the Inpatient Registry was started in 1964, childhood infections are not included. However, because personal history of immune stimulatory conditions was assessed similarly among the patients with AML/MDS and control participants, any under-diagnosis should be nondifferential, and any bias should be toward the null. We considered the effect of possible bias as a result of greater likelihood of patients with AML to have multiple different autoimmune or infectious conditions. We found that the overall patterns of association were present even when individuals with multiple different conditions were not included in the analysis. This indicates that multiple, chronic, immune-related conditions did not bias our results. We also found that autoimmune disease and infections are independent risk factors for AML/MDS. An inherent limitation of our study, which includes patients who were diagnosed with AML/MDS during a long study period, is that diagnostic criteria have evolved over time. The most important change was that 20% blasts were needed for AML diagnosis, whereas patients with 20% to 30% blasts were classified as MDS before 2001.3 Because we included both conditions in the analyses, and because the risks were similar, this should not have had a major impact on our results. We also evaluated the risk in patients with AML who were diagnosed in 1990 or later, and the results were essentially the same (data not shown).

Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the patients with AML/MDS had a preceding malignancy that was not reported to the cancer registry. However, in our large, nationwide study on the ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy of lymphoproliferative malignancies that were diagnosed in Sweden, we found that the diagnostic accuracy and completeness was more than 93%.16

In summary, we found that a previous history of certain infections and autoimmune diseases increases the risk of AML and MDS. These findings raise the possibility that immune-related conditions might act as triggers for AML/MDS development. The underlying mechanisms may also be due to a common genetic predisposition or an effect of treatment for autoimmune conditions/infections. Future studies are needed to increase our understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms of our findings.

Acknowledgment

We thank Shiva Ayobi, The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Susanne Dahllöf, Statistics Sweden, Orebro, Sweden; and Emily Steplowski, Information Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, for important efforts in the development of this database.

Footnotes

Supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Stockholm County Council, the Karolinska Institutet Foundations, the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Adolf H. Lundin Charitable foundation.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Magnus Björkholm, Ola Landgren, Lynn R. Goldin

Provision of study materials or patients: Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson,Magnus Björkholm, Åsa R. Derolf, Ola Landgren

Collection and assembly of data: Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Ola Landgren

Data analysis and interpretation: Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Magnus Björkholm, Malin Hultcrantz, Åsa R. Derolf, Ola Landgren, Lynn R. Goldin

Manuscript writing: Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Ola Landgren, Lynn R. Goldin

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

REFERENCES

  • 1.Estey E, Döhner H. Acute myeloid leukemia. Lancet. 2006;368:1894–1907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69780-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Derolf AR, Kristinsson SY, Andersson TM, et al. Improved patient survival for acute myeloid leukemia: A population-based study of 9729 patients diagnosed in Sweden between 1973 and 2005. Blood. 2009;113:3666–3672. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-179341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues (ed 4) Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Travis LB, Li CY, Zhang ZN, et al. Hematopoietic malignancies and related disorders among benzene-exposed workers in China. Leuk Lymphoma. 1994;14:91–102. doi: 10.3109/10428199409049654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kane EV, Roman E, Cartwright R, et al. Tobacco and the risk of acute leukaemia in adults. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1228–1233. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strom SS, Gu Y, Gruschkus SK, Pierce SA, et al. Risk factors of myelodysplastic syndromes: A case-control study. Leukemia. 2005;19:1912–1918. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith SM, Le Beau MM, Huo D, et al. Clinical-cytogenetic associations in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia: The University of Chicago series. Blood. 2003;102:43–52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Andersen MK, Andersen MT, et al. Genetics of therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2008;22:240–248. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malinge S, Izraeli S, Crispino JD. Insights into the manifestations, outcomes, and mechanisms of leukemogenesis in Down syndrome. Blood. 2009;113:2619–2628. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-163501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cervantes F, Tassies D, Salgado C, et al. Acute transformation in nonleukemic chronic myeloproliferative disorders: Actuarial probability and main characteristics in a series of 218 patients. Acta Haematol. 1991;85:124–127. doi: 10.1159/000204873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abdulkarim K, Girodon F, Johansson P, et al. AML transformation in 56 patients with Ph- MPD in two well defined populations. Eur J Haematol. 2009;82:106–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cooper GS, Kamel F, Sandler DP, et al. Risk of adult acute leukemia in relation to prior immune-related conditions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:867–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zheng W, Linet MS, Shu XO, et al. Prior medical conditions and the risk of adult leukemia in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Cancer Causes Control. 1993;4:361–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00051339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Samuelsson J, et al. Autoimmunity and the risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica. 2010;95:1216–1220. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.020412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Socialstyrelsen: Cancer Incidence in Sweden 2006. Stockholm, Sweden: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Turesson I, Linet MS, Björkholm M, et al. Ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy for hematopoietic lymphoproliferative malignancies in Sweden 1964-2003. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:2260–2266. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koshiol J, Gridley G, Engels EA, et al. Chronic immune stimulation and subsequent Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1903–1909. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Linet MS, Humphrey RL, Mehl ES, et al. A case-control and family study of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Leukemia. 1993;7:1363–1369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smedby KE, Hjalgrim H, Askling J, et al. Autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by subtype. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:51–60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Landgren O, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Autoimmunity and susceptibility to Hodgkin lymphoma: A population-based case-control study in Scandinavia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1321–1330. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bowen DT. Etiology of acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:82–88. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Deschler B, Lübbert M. Acute myeloid leukemia: Epidemiology and etiology. Cancer. 2006;107:2099–2107. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kristinsson SY, Koshiol J, Bjorkholm M, et al. Immune-related and inflammatory conditions and risk of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma or Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:557–567. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Landgren O, Rapkin JS, Caporaso NE, et al. Respiratory tract infections and subsequent risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:2198–2201. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-044008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson LA, Pfeiffer RM, Landgren O, et al. Risks of myeloid malignancies in patients with autoimmune conditions. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:822–828. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Socié G, Henry-Amar M, Bacigalupo A, et al. Malignant tumors occurring after treatment of aplastic anemia: European Bone Marrow Transplantation-Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1152–1157. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310143291603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Söderberg KC, Jonsson F, Winqvist O, et al. Autoimmune diseases, asthma and risk of haematological malignancies: A nationwide case-control study in Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:3028–3033. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Askling J, Fored CM, Baecklund E, et al. Haematopoietic malignancies in rheumatoid arthritis: Lymphoma risk and characteristics after exposure to tumour necrosis factor antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1414–1420. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.033241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dalamaga M, Petridou E, Cook FE, et al. Risk factors for myelodysplastic syndromes: A case-control study in Greece. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:603–608. doi: 10.1023/a:1019573319803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Enright H, Miller W. Autoimmune phenomena in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma. 1997;24:483–489. doi: 10.3109/10428199709055585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kolte B, Baer AN, Sait SN, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in the setting of low dose weekly methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;42:371–378. doi: 10.3109/10428190109064593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES