Skip to main content
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity logoLink to Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
. 2011 Jun 20;4:229–243. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S19197

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance in patients treated with antiobesity drugs

Federica Guaraldi 1,, Uberto Pagotto 2, Renato Pasquali 2
PMCID: PMC3139531  PMID: 21792322

Abstract

Background:

The prevalence of obesity and related diseases has increased enormously in the last few decades, becoming a very important medical and social issue. Because of the increasing number of people who need weight loss therapies and the high costs associated with these, the search for reliable predictors of success for weight loss and weight maintenance treatments has become a priority.

Objective:

A literature review was undertaken to identify possible predictors of outcome of weight loss and weight maintenance in patients treated with antiobesity drugs.

Results:

For the majority of variables, published data are not sufficient to define their role on final outcomes. Among all considered factors, only early response to treatment appeared to be a reliable positive predictor, and diabetes a negative predictor of weight loss and maintenance.

Conclusion:

To date, no definitive results have been obtained. Due to the great benefits of reliable predictors of outcome associated to currently available antiobesity drugs and those under development, identifying these predictors has to be supported and encouraged.

Keywords: obesity, weight loss predictors, pharmacological treatment

Introduction

In the last decade, the prevalence of overweight and obesity (defined as BMI >25 kg/m2 and >30 kg/m2, respectively) and their complications (especially type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, male and female infertility, and certain forms of cancer) has greatly increased among adults and children. It has become an alarming medical and social issue1 resulting from socioeconomic and behavioral changes in modern society (leading to increased energy consumption and decreased energy expenditure),2 and biological factors.3

Weight loss of 5%–10% of initial body weight reduces cardiovascular and metabolic health risks associated with obesity.4 International Health Guidelines4,5 recommend lifestyle modification as the first strategy in the management of obesity. If lifestyle modification alone is ineffective, pharmacotherapy may be considered for individuals with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or for those with a BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 with comorbidities (eg, hypertension, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes) or a family history of overweight. Bariatric surgery should be reserved for individuals with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 and comorbidities who do not lose weight with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy.4,5 Very recently, US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of Allergan’s LAP-Band Adjustable Gastric Banding System for people with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 without comorbidities or for >30 kg/m2 and at least one comorbidity.6

Several studies have shown that the different antiobesity drugs, in conjunction with lifestyle treatments, can induce a weight loss up to 5%–10%, even if there is a great variability in individual response to a specific treatment.79 Several different treatments, based on lifestyle modifications,1012 drugs,13 and surgery14,15 have been developed in the past, and some others are currently being studied.13

The investigation for factors responsible for obesity onset and response to antiobesity treatments started in the early 1960s,16,17 and the number of studies in this field has multiplied over the years. Most studies showed a wide variability in inter-individual response to all kinds of treatments,18 a usually modest result in weight loss and maintenance,19 and the involvement of many environmental, genetic, and behavioral factors.1923 However, predictors of outcome continue to be poorly understood. Availability of good predictors would allow physicians to match treatment to patients, and would improve cost-efficacy and patient’s chances of success in losing and maintaining weight.22,23

This article focuses on factors that have been suggested as possible predictors of weight loss and/or weight maintenance in patients treated with orlistat, diethylpropion, mazindol, sibutramine, and topiramate (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main characteristics of antiobesity medications included in the study

Drugs approved by FDA specifically for weight loss
Drug Mechanism of action Typical dosing Adverse effects Effect on weight
Orlistata,d,9,33 Limits fats absorption; pancreatic lipase inhibitor 120 mg tid Abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, oily stools, diarrhea, decreased absorption of fat soluble vitamins
Liver injury (rare)
2.9 kg placebo subtracted weight loss at 1 year
Diethylpropiona,e,9 Appetite suppressant; sympathomimetic amine Average 75 mg/d Dizziness, headache, insomnia, restless, increase in blood pressure, palpitations, tachycardia, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash 3.0 kg placebo-subtracted weight loss in studies ranging 6–52 weeks
Sibutramineb,9,33 Appetite suppressant; serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor 10–15 mg/d Hypertension, tachycardia 4.2 kg placebo-subtracted weight loss at 1 year
Mazindolb,13 Appetite suppressant; norepinephrine inhibitor.
Inhibitor of gastric acids and insulin secretion
1–4 mg/d Restlessness, hypertension, nervousness Average 3 kg placebo subtracted weight loss in 12 week studies
Topiramatec,33 Weight loss mechanism unknown. Supposed monoamine-mediated appetite suppression; increase in fat metabolism and reduction in lipogenesis 90–200 mg/d Cognitive impairment, peripheral neuropathy 6.5% pooled random-effects of topiramate on weight loss compared with placebo

Notes:

a

Drugs approved by FDA specifically for weight loss;

b

Drugs previously approved by FDA specifically for weight loss and recently withdrawn from the market;

c

Drugs approved by the FDA for the other indications that exhibit weight loss promoting effects;

d

Drug approved by FDA for long-term treatment;

e

Drug approved by FDA for short-term treatment (12 weeks).

Methods and study description

A literature search was performed using PubMed database entering the drug name “and weight loss” for drugs approved by the FDA specifically for weight loss (orlistat, phentermine, and diethylpropion); drugs previously approved by the FDA that have been recently withdrawn from the market (sibutramine, mazindol, and rimonabant); and drugs approved by the FDA for other indications that exhibit weight loss promoting effects (topiramate, bupropion, and zonisamide). We found articles focusing on predictors in patients treated only with diethylpropion, orlistat, sibutramine, mazindol, and topiramate. Some studies investigated treatment outcomes in patients treated with an association of phentermine and fenfluoramine but, because this compound is no longer available and no comparative data with each single drug exists, these articles have not been included. Additional relevant articles from reference lists were included.

Only articles focusing on adults were included. Absolute or relative weight loss was the only considered variable. Thirty-three studies investigating gender, anthropometric, demographic, psychological, behavioral, and hereditary characteristics, associated medical conditions and habits, dietetic advices, and environmental factors were identified and included in this review.

All studies included subjects with a ≥25 kg/m2 of both genders, except for two24,25 including females only. Age ranged from 16 to 70 years. The number of patients included in the different studies ranged from 36 to 3277. The duration of the study varied from 8 to 208 weeks. Some included a run-in phase.2631 The main characteristics of the patient sample and program of the considered studies are displayed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Main characteristics of the patient sample and program of the considered studies

Author, year Sample Type of study Program
Alberici et al77 BL: 51 p.
ET: 49 p.
BLCPCS: mA 44.1 ± 11.5. F 36. mBMI 24.0 ± 3.4.
Prospective study Treatment: Topiramate was administered following slow up titration; full dosage of 100 mg/day, bid regimen, reached within 4 weeks. 4 months treatment
Ben-Menachem et al75 BL: 49 p. F 28. mA 36.2 ± 11.7. mBW 77.8 ± 16.8. mBMI 26.9 ± 5.9.
ET: 38 p. F 22. mA 35.9 ± 11.5. mBW 75.8 ± 14.8. mBMI 26.3 ± 9.3.
Prospective study Treatment: 1 year. Topiramate added to pre-existing anticonvulsant therapy. Starting dose 25 mg/day, increased biweekly in 25 or 50 mg increments to the best-tolerated dosage providing maximum seizure control mean dosage after 3 months 81 mg/day (21–154 mg/day)
Elfhag et al27 BL: 36 p.
ET: 30 p.
BLCPCS: F 22. mA 43 ± 12 (20–64). mBMI 40 ± 4 (33–45).
Prospective study Run in phase: 6 weeks. Clinical trial evaluating the effect of sibutramine on food consumption in laboratory test meals. 2 weeks each of: sibutramine, placebo, and a wash out period (crossover design)
Treatment: 26 weeks. Sibutramine (15 mg/day) + monthly dietary advice
Elfhag and Rossner19 BL: 36 p.
F 27. mA 43 ± 12 years (20–64). mBMI 39 ± 4 (30–45).
ET: 31 p.
Prospective study Run in phase: 6 weeks. Sibutramine/placebo and wash out period Treatment: 26 weeks. 15 mg/day sibutramine and dietary advice in monthly group sessions with a dietitian
Elfhag et al35 BLCPCS: 478 p.
F 301. mA 42.4 ± 12.2 (16–70). mBMI 42.4 ± 12.2 (26–68).
Retrospective analysis of patients who completed the study 1. Weight Watcher treatment (control) or
2. Sibutramine or
3. Orlistat
Fabricatore et al45 BL: 224 P.
F 180. mA 43.8 ± 10.2. C 146. OE 76.
Sibutramine: 55 p.
Lifestyle modification: 55 p.
Combined therapy: 60 p.
Sibutramine + brief behavioral therapy: 54 p.
ET: 185 p.
Prospective study 52 weeks treatment:
1200–1500 kcal/day diet (15% proteins, 30% fats, 55% carbohydrates) + walking + random assignment to:
  1. Sibutramine: 8 visits of 10–15 minutes with a primary care provider + pamphlet providing tips for healthy lifestyle + sibutramine 15 mg/day

  2. Lifestyle modifications: 30 group behavior modification sessions

  3. Combined therapy (a + b)

  4. Sibutramine + brief therapy: sibutramine 15 mg/day + 8 sessions of 10–15 minutes behavior therapy sessions

Finer et al29 BL: 928 p.
Nondiabetic: 771 p. F 611. C 763. mA 42.4 ± 10.7. mBW 97.5 ± 15.2. mBMI 35.0 ± 4.1.
Diabetic: 157 p. mA 51.4 ± 9.6. F 84. C 153. mBW 101.3 ± 17.7. mBMI 35.7 ± 5.4.
Retrospective analysis of patients included in 7 different studies Run in phase: placebo run-in phase (3 studies); open-label sibutramine run-in phase (2 studies); very low calorie diet (1 study) Treatment: 52 weeks; random assignment to sibutramine (10 mg/day) or placebo (6 studies with fixed dose; 1 study with dose titrated depending on patient’s weight maintenance)
Frey et al50 BLCPCS: 110 p. C. F 74. A 42–48.
BMI 35.3–35.4.
Sibutramine group: 54 p. F 38. mA 46.8 ± 10.5. mBW 99.2 ± 14.1. mBMI 35.1 ± 4.2.
Placebo group: 56 p. F 36. mA 49.3 ± 11.0. mBW 104.5 ± 15.2. mBMI 35.5 ± 3.3.
Retrospective study on a part of patients who had completed the program 54 weeks treatment: random assignment to 15 mg/day of sibutramine or placebo + behavior program (16 group sessions) + physical activity + diet (daily energy requirement minus 500 to 1000 kcal/day)
Greenway78 SIBUTRAMINE: 83 obese patients with diabetes; 2004 obese patients without diabetes.
ORLISTAT: 321 obese patients with diabetes; 2404 obese patients without diabetes.
MAZINDOL: 40 obese patients with diabetes; 998 obese patients without diabetes.
Retrospective comparative analysis between a study focusing on diabetic patients and an average of studies in nondiabetic patients for each type of drug 12 weeks sibutramine treatment or
52 weeks orlistat treatment or
12 weeks mazindol treatment
Grudell et a47 BL: 181 p.
Placebo: 62 p. F 54. mA 41.3 ± 1.4. mBW 95.9 ± 2.1. mBMI 34.5 ± 0.6.
Sibutramine 10 mg: 58 p. F 53. mA 42.2 ± 1.4. mBMI 34.8 ± 0.7.
Sibutramine 15 mg: 61 p. F 54. mA 44.8 ± 1.3. mBMI 33.9 ± 0.6.
ET: 158 p.
Prospective study 12 weeks treatment: behavioral therapy (LEARN manual + 1 group session of 15 minutes each week led by a psychologist) + placebo or sibutramine 10 mg/day or 15 mg/day
Hainer et al24 BL: 80 p.
F. mA 43.9 ± 10.6 (18–65). mBMI 36.7 ± 4.8 (30–45).
1st phase: sibutramine 38 p.
Placebo 42 p. 2nd phase: 80 p.
ET: 67 p.
Prospective study 1st phase: 4 months; random assignment to sibutramine 10 mg/day or placebo
2nd phase: 8 months; sibutramine + 5–6 MJ/day diet (50%–60% carbohydrates; 15%–20% proteins; 25%–30% fat) + physical activity + food diary records
Hansen et al46 BL: 605 p.
BMI 30–45; 18–65 yr
Completers of the 1st phase: 505 p.
mA 40.4 ± 10.4.
mBW 102.5 ± 15.3.
mBMI 36.7 ± 4.1.
Enrolled in the 2nd phase: 467 p.
352 sibutramine.
115 placebo. ET: 263 p.
Prospective study 1st phase: 6 months; sibutramine (10 mg/day) and LCD (patient’s estimated daily energy expenditure minus 600 kcal/day. 45%–50% carbohydrates; 30% fats; 15%–20% proteins) 2nd phase: 18 months; random assignment for patients who achieved ≥5% of weight loss to sibutramine 10 mg/day (352 p) or placebo (115 p)
Hauner et al53 BL: 348 p. BMI 30–40; 18–65 yr.
Sibutramine: 174 p.
F 136. mA 44.5 ± 1.2. mBW 100.2 ± 1.9. mBMI 35.6 ± 0.6.
Placebo: 174 p. F 123.
mA 47.3 ± 1.3. mBW 105.4 ± 2.0. mBMI 35.7 ± 0.5.
Retrospective analysis of patients included in the study 54 weeks treatment: 20 group sessions and prescription of a diet (500/1000 kcal minus of the daily required energy expenditure) + physical activity + sibutramine or placebo (random assignment) 2 years follow up
Hsiao et al54 BL: 131 p. Sibutramine: 87 p. Placebo 44 p.
ET: 118 p.
BLCPCS: Sibutramine 82 p. F 41.
mA 31.7 ± 4.9.
mBW Placebo 37 p. F 17.
mA 31.1 ± 5.8.
mBW 83.8 ± 15.0.
mBMI 29.8 ± 3.4.
Prospective study 12 weeks treatment: sibutramine 10 mg/day or placebo
Hsiao et al57 BL: 131 p.
Sibutramine: 87 p.
Placebo 44 p.
ET: 118 p.
BLCPCS: Sibutramine 82 p. F 41.
mA 31.7 ± 4.9.
mBW Placebo 37 p. F 17.
mA 31.1 ± 5.8.
mBW 83.8 ± 15.0.
mBMI 29.8 ± 3.4.
Prospective study 12 weeks treatment: sibutramine 10 mg/day or placebo
Klein et al76 BL: 26 p.
ET: 22 p. F 13. BLCPCS: mA 41.5.
mBMI 28.0 ± 6.6.
mBW 80.3 ± 19.3.
Prospective study 6 months treatment: topiramate
LLoret-Linares et al37 BL:
Sibutramine (3 studies): 115–467 p. F 76%–84%.
mA 40.4–43.3. mBMI 32.4–37.9.
Orlistat (12 studies): 422–3277 p. F 55%–87%.
mA 40–53. mBMI 34.7–37.4.
Rimonabant (4 studies): 688–1826 p.
Retrospective comparative analysis between studies considering nondiabetic and diabetic subjects for each type of drug Sibutramine: 10 or 20 mg once a day for 52 or 104 weeks or
Orlistat: 120 mg three times a day for 52/76/104/208 weeks or
Rimonabant: 20 mg daily for 52 or 104 weeks. All trials combined pharmacological therapy with a reduced-calorie diet
Malone and Alger-Maye40 BL: 30 p. F 26.
mA 43.8 ± 9.7.
mBW 127 ± 34.
mBMI 45.5 ± 11.8.
Intervention group: 15 p.
F 14. mA 44.9 ± 10.5.
BW 130 ± 39. BMI 48.3 ± 14.6.
Control group: F 12. mA 42.8 ± 9.
BW 124 ± 30. BMI 42.8 ± 8.1.
ET: 9 p. Intervention group: 7 p. Control: 2 p.
Prospective study Patients randomly assigned to the group followed by a community pharmacist (trained and educated for 1 day to support clients during weight loss treatment with orlistat) or to the group not followed by a pharmacist and followed for 26 weeks
Norris et al30 BL: 31 studies.
mA 48–66. F 50%.
Fluoxetine (6 studies): 296 p (total number).
Orlistat (8 studies): 2036 p (total number).
Sibutramine (8 studies): 1047 p (total number).
Cimetidine 1 study.
Diethylpropion (3 studies): 40–58 p (single study).
Mazindol (3 studies);
10–64 p (single study).
Phentermine (2 studies).
Meta-analysis of studies considering nondiabetic and diabetic subjects for each type of drug Run-in period: 1–5 weeks in most studies; placebo + dietary counseling
Treatment: Fluoxetine: 8 to 52 weeks or
Orlistat: 12 to 57 weeks or
Sibutramine: 12 to 52 weeks or
Cimetidine: 12 weeks
Dyethylpropion: 8 to 40 weeks or
Mazindol: 6 to 12 weeks or
Phentermine: 16 to 26 weeks
Peters et al25 BL: 149 p. F. mA
54 ± 5.78 (45–65).
mBW 103.41 ± 20.65
(68.03–175.54).
mBMI 40.10 ± 8.01 (30–76).
FU: 74 p.
Prospective study 6 months treatment: sibutramine 15 mg/day + 1 hour/month behavior modification seminar + daily exercise
Rissanen et al26 BLCPCS: 220 p.
F 178. A 42–49.
BW 90.3–101.9.
BMI 32.7–36.1.
Retrospective analysis of patients who completed the treatment in two different studies Run in phase: 4 weeks; hypocaloric diet (30% fat; 500 kcal/day energy deficit) + placebo
Treatment: 2 years; random assignment to: 120 mg/day orlistat or placebo + diet
Risser et al63 BL:
PAR1: 22 p.
F 90.9%.
mA 4 9.9 ± 12.
mBMI 39.3 ± 7.
Non-PAR: 47 p.
F 78.7%. mA 47.1 ± 10.
mBMI 37.1 ± 6.12.
Retrospective analysis 1st phase: 8 weeks; 800–1220 kcal/day diet + 24-hour food diary + visits (first 10 weeks: 2–5 days/week) + sibutramine 15 g/daily (flexible doses adjusted depending on patient)
2nd phase: 40 weeks; weight maintenance through well-balanced meals and regular exercise + sibutramine 15 mg/day (flexible doses adjusted depending on patient)
Rodin et al41 BL: 204 p.
Clinic 1: 144 p.
F 129. A 18–59.
BW 28%–199% overweight.
Clinic 2: 60 p. F 60. A 18–54.
BW 17%–183% overweight.
ET: clinic 1: 33 p.
Clinic 2: 56 p.
Prospective study Clinic 1: 14 weeks (8 weeks treatment): random assignment to 4 groups: behavior modification treatment, diethylpropion 65 mg/day, mazindol 2 mg/day, placebo
Clinic 2: 10 weeks; (9 weeks treatment): behavior therapy for all patients + random assignment to two different formulations of mazindol or placebo
Shimizu and Mori66
Shimizu et al67
BL: 24 p. Trp64Trp: 16 p. Trp64Arg: 8 p.
BMI > 35 kg/m2.
BL: 41 p. F 25. BMI > 35.
Prospective study 12 weeks treatment: mazindol (starting dose 0.5 mg/day. Increments of 0.5 mg/day every 2 weeks up to 1.5 mg/day at week 6 and then continued until week 12)
Tankova et al59 BL: 173 p.
Diabetic patients: 83 p.
Sibutramine group: 44 p. F 27. mA 45.2 ± 5.2.
mBMI 33.6 ± 2.2.
Control group: 39 p.
F 24. mA 44.8 ± 6.1.
mBMI 33.9 ± 2.8.
Nondiabetic patient: 90 p.
Sibutramine group: 49 p.
F 32. mA 41.9 ± 5.7.
mBMI 34.3 ± 2.6.
Control group: 41 p.
F 27. mA 44.6 ± 6.0.
mBMI 33.9 ± 2.2.
Prospective study 3 months treatment: hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit on the estimated total daily energy expenditure. <30% fat, 15% protein, 55%–60% carbohydrates) +30 minutes walking/day + random assignment to sibutramine once daily or placebo.
First month dosage of sibutramine was 10 mg/day replaced by 15 mg/day in case of no change in body weight
Toplak et al38 BL: 430 p.
BMI 30–43; 18–70 yr;
BW ≥90, waist circumference ≥88 cm (F) or ≥102 cm (M).
Orlistat + 500 kcal/day diet: 215 p. F 168. mA 41.3 ± 11.0. mBW 103.4 ± 11.2. mBMI 37.3 ± 3.4.
Orlistat + 1000 kcal/day diet: 215 p. F 166. mA 41.1 ± 12.1.
mBW 104.7 ± 12.8.
mBMI 37.4 ± 3.6.
ET: 264 p.
Prospective study 1 year treatment: orlistat 120 mg 3 times/day + dietary counseling + daily food diary + random assignment to a diet (50% carbohydrates, 30% fat, 20% protein) of 500 or 1000 kcal/day deficit Patients who achieved a 5% weight loss at both months 3 and 6 (295 p) were allowed to continue the study until month 12
Theisen et al74 BL: 26 p. F 10. mA
37.4 ± 10.3 (20.7–65.3).
M mBMI 28.1 ± 6.4.
F mBMI 22.5 ± 3.5.
ET: 18 p.
Prospective study 25 weeks treatment with topiramate added to existing anticonvulsant therapy (carbamazepine 12 p; carmanazepine + valproate 3 p; carbamazepine + lamotrigine 3 p; carbamazepine + valproate + lamotrigine 3 p; carbamazepine + valproate + phenobarbital 1 p; carbamazepine + phenobarbital 1 p; carbamazepine + phenytoin 1 p; phenytoin + phenobarbital 1 p; phenytoin + lamotrigine + phenobarbital 1 p)
Ullrich et al31 BL: 261 p. F 214.
mA 41.4 ± 9.8.
mBMI 36.8 ± 4.2.
Sibutramine group: 204 p.
F 168. mA 41.4 ± 9.7.
mBMI 36.6 ± 4.2.
Placebo group: 57 p.
F 46. mA 41.3 ± 10.0.
mBMI 37.1 ± 3.8.
Retrospective analysis of people who completed the study Run in phase: 4 weeks; hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit on patient’s estimated basal metabolic rate. ≤30% fat; protein and carbohydrate ad libitum) + placebo (3 times/day with meals)
Treatment: 72 weeks; orlistat (120 mg × 3/day). 4-day food diary at weeks −4, −2, 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 64. Group weight management program sessions (one each 4 weeks)
Van Baak et al48 BL: 605 p. BMI 30–45; 17–65 yr.
After 6 mo run in phase: 467 p.
ET: 261 p. F 214. mA 41.4 ± 9.8.
BMI 36.8 ± 4.2.
Prospective study 1st phase: 6 months; sibutramine (10 mg/day) and LCD (patient’s estimated daily energy expenditure minus 600 kcal/day. 45%–50% carbohydrates; 30% fats; 15%–20% proteins)
2nd phase: 18 months; random assignment for patients who achieved ≥5% of weight loss to sibutramine 10 mg/day (352 p) or placebo (115 p). Dietary advice and one meeting with a dietician a month
Vazquez Roque et al44 BL: 48 p. Sibutramine 25 p.
Placebo 23 p.
Overweight: 24 p.
mA 36.7 ± 1.7. F 17. C 87.5%.
mBW 79.6 ± 1.6.
mBMI 27.9 ± 0.3.
Obese: 24 p. mA
44.2 ± 2.6. F 13.
C 95.8%. mBW 98.2 ± 2.7.
mBMI 34.8 ± 0.7.
ET: 43 p. Sibutramine 22 p.
Placebo 21 p.
Prospective study 12 weeks treatment: LEARN manual (self-help behavioral manual for weight loss) + 10–15 minutes behavior therapy sessions (one every 4 weeks) + random assignment to sibutramine 15 mg/day or placebo
Womble et al65 BL: Group 1: 59 p. F 31.
M: mA 50.21 ± 7.39;
mBMI 39.94 ± 5.99.
F: mA 45.72 ± 9.2.
mBMI 40.34 ± 8.20.
Group 2: 32 p taken from group 1. F 15.
ET group 1: 59 p.
Group 2: 32 p.
Prospective study 6 months treatment for group 1; 12 months treatment for group 2
For both groups, random assignment to:
  1. Fenfluramine + mazindol (6 months; 29 p. 12 months; 18 p) or

  2. Fenfluramine + phentermine (6 months; 25 p. 12 months; 11 p) or

  3. Caffeine + ephedrine (6 months; 2 p. 12 months, 1 p) or

  4. Mazindol (6 months, 3 p. 12 months, 2 p)

Notes:

1

Cases: patients who had received a prescription for sibutramine in response to priori authorization through their health care insurer (PAR). Controls: subjects who did not receive reimbursement, although they were prescribed, sibutramine (non-PAR).

Abbreviations: BL, sample characteristics at base line; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); BLCPCS, baseline characteristics of people who completed the study; BW, body weight; C, Caucasians; F, number of female patients; ET, sample characteristics at the end of the program; mA, mean age; mBMI, mean body mass index (kg/m2); mBW, mean body weight; OE, other ethnicity; p, number of patients; yr, years old; LCD, low-calorie diet.

Predictors associated with orlistat treatments

Orlistat is a semisynthetic derivative of lipstatin which irreversibly and selectively binds to pancreatic lipases, reducing fat absorption by approximately 30% (Table 3).32 The prescribed dose is 120 mg, three times/day with meals. A meta-analysis33 including approximately 10,000 participants treated for at least 1 year, reported a mean placebo-subtracted weight loss of 2.9 kg. Abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, oily stools, and diarrhea represent common adverse effects; severe liver injury is rare.34

Table 3.

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance in patients treated with orlistat

Author, year Predictors
Demographic and anthropometric factors Elfhag et al35 PPWL: male gender
Psychological factors and eating behaviors Elfhag et al35 PPWL: high levels of order and deliberation (conscientiousness). High levels of self-discipline and conscientiousness ntPWL: high levels of eating restraint, neuroticism, anxiety, and depression
Initial weight loss in the lead-in period and under treatment Rissanen et al26 PPWL: Weight loss ≥2.5 kg during 4 weeks lead-in period; weight loss ≥5% body weight after 12 weeks treatment; ≥10% body weight after 6 months
Toplak et al38 PPWL: ≥5% weight loss at 3 and 6 months
Associated medical, dietetic, and environmental factors Malone and Alger-Mayer40 ntPWL: pharmacist’s support
Toplak et al38 ntPWL: 500 kc/day diet vs 1000 kcal/day diet
Ullrich et al31 PPWL: low fat and carbohydrate intake

Abbreviations: NPWL, negative predictor of weight loss; NPWM, negative predictor of weight maintenance; ntPWL, not predictor of weight loss; ntPWM, not predictor of weight maintenance; PPWL, positive predictor of weight loss; PPWM, positive predictor of weight maintenance.

Demographic variables

Only one study35 investigated the impact of gender on weight loss, and found no significant difference in the percentage of initial body weight lost by males and females.

Psychological factors and eating behaviors

Orlistat weight loss was positively related to the traits ‘order’ (P < 0.05), ‘deliberation’ (P < 0.01), and ‘self-discipline’, included in the main personality factor conscientiousness35 (which reflect the ability to have and to persist with a goal-directed and motivated behavior, hence to consider matters before acting, to be methodical, well organized, and self-disciplined). This suggests that people with a stronger personality and great conscientiousness can achieve higher levels of long-term compliance towards a high demanding treatment like orlistat, a characterized thrice-daily regimen, and dietary fat restriction. The importance of determination on treatment’s results is evident in European prescribing information36 that, based on several observations,26 orlistat is only recommended to those patients who have previously lost at least 2.5 kg by diet alone in a 4-week period, as an indication of their capacity to comply with prescribed dietary changes. Conversely, levels of restrained eating, anxiety, and depression showed no impact on the final outcome.35

Diabetes

Two studies30,37 pointed out the difficulty in losing weight experienced by diabetic patients treated with orlistat.

Initial weight loss

A study conducted on 229 patients who completed a 2-year treatment26 showed that people who lost ≥5% of their initial weight in the first 12 weeks achieved better final results than people who did not (−11.9 ± 0.8% vs −4.7 ± 0.5%; P = 0.0001). This finding was confirmed by another study38 in which >80% of patients who achieved ≥5% reduction in their body weight after 3 and 6 months maintained >5% weight loss and >50% achieved ≥10% weight loss after 12 months (P < 0.01). Accordingly, European36 and National Institute for Clinical Excellence39 prescribing guidelines, which recommend that only people who lose ≥5% of initial body weight after 12 weeks and ≥10% after 6 months should continue taking orlistat.

Associated dietetic and environmental factors

Pharmacist’s support was shown to improve patient’s persistence with orlistat therapy but it did not improve the total amount of weight loss.40 The total daily calories assumed with diet (500 vs 1000 kcal/day)38 did not have a marked impact on the overall clinical outcome of weight reduction (average weight loss 11.8 and 11.4 kg respectively), while a low fat, but also carbohydrate, consumption was essential to lose weight.31

Predictors associated with diethylproprion treatments

Diethylpropion is an amphetamine like analog currently approved by FDA for short-term weight loss.9 A meta-analysis conducted on several studies in which patients were treated with diethylpropion 75 mg/day in combination with lifestyle treatment showed an average 3.0 kg of additional weight loss, compared with placebo.9 Common side effects include central nervous system stimulation, dizziness, headache, insomnia, restlessness, mild increases in blood pressure, palpitations, mild tachycardia, mild gastrointestinal symptoms, and rash.9

To our knowledge, only one study41 focused on predictors of weight loss in patients treated with diethylpropion, showing no statistically significant effect of patients’ personality on weight loss, but just a positive correlation between social conformity and treatment completion (P < 0.004).

Predictors associated with sibutramine treatments

Sibutramine is a centrally-acting drug that reduces energy intake and increases satiety mainly through the inhibition of serotonine and norepinephrine reuptake (Table 4).8 Weight loss is enhanced by the stimulation of thermogenesis42,43 and the delay in gastric emptying.44 The prescribing dose was 10–15 mg once daily. A recent meta-analysis33 that included 2,838 participants treated with sibutramine for at least 1 year, showed a mean placebo-subtracted weight loss of 4.2 kg. The drug was withdrawn from the market in October 2010 because of cardiovascular side effects.13

Table 4.

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance in patients treated with sibutramine

Author, year Predictors
Psychosocial factors and eating behaviors Elfhag et al27 PPWL: high deviating levels of demand states (hunger); high levels of dependency orientation and oral traits. Self-inspective ability
ntPWL: levels of anxiety, depression, bodily concern; eating disorders; affective response to external stimuli
Elfhag and Rossnerl19 PPWL: unrestrained eating (less cognitive control and conscious determination to resist from eating, less strategic dieting)
ntPWL: hunger and disinhibition score; depressive features
Elfhag et al35 PPWL: unrestrained eating (emotional and external eating); high levels of neuroticism, anxiety and depression. High levels of self-consciousness and hostility2
Fabricatore et al45 NPWL: depressive symptoms
Hainer et al24 NPWL: high dietary restraint at baseline; high initial depression score
PPWL: increase in dietary restraint during first months of treatment
PPWM: decrease in disinhibition scores
Demographic and anthropometric factors Elfhag et al27 ntPWL: age; gender; pretreatment body weight
Elfhag et al35 PPWL: young age
Fabricatore et al45 PPWL: Caucasian ethnicity ntPWL: age
Hansen et al46 PPWL: high baseline body weight (high resting metabolic rate)
ntPWL: age; gender
Familial obesity and personal weight history Elfhag et al27 NP: familial history of obesity; being obese during all adulthood
Fabricatore et al45 PPWL: having been overweight for a long time
Hansen et al46 ntPWL: age of obesity onset; number of previous slimming attempts
Initial weight loss in the run in period and under treatment Elfhag et al27 PPWL: great initial weight loss
Fabricatore et al45 PPWL: early adherence and weight loss
Finer et al29 PPWL: high early weight loss (≥4 kg at 3 months)
Hainer et al24 PPWL: high initial weight loss
Hansen et al46 PPWL: high initial weight loss in the run-in period; high initial weight loss under treatment
ntPWL: number of previous slimming attempts; age of onset of obesity
van Baak et al48 PPWM: high initial weight loss
Grudell et al47 PPWL: high initial (4 weeks) weight loss
Genetic factors Frey et al50 PPWL: A allele carriers position −1211 of GNAS gene promoter
Grudell et al47 PPWL: gene pairs 5HTTLPR LS/SS and GNβ3 GNβ3 rs5443 TC/TT; α2A CC and GNβ3 rs5443 TC/TT
Hauner et al53 PPWL and PPWM: CC genotype of GNβ3 rs5443
Hsiao et al54 PPWL: T allele carriers (TT or TC genotype) of GNβ3 rs5443
Hsiao et al57 PPWL: −866 A polymorphism of UCP2; association between −866A polymorphism of UCP2 and rs5443 T polymorphism of GNβ3
Peters et al25 PPWL: homozygous A148A or G148G polymorphism of PNMT
Vazquez Roque et al44 PPWL: LS/SS genotype of SLC6A4 ntPWL: α2A-1291 C/G; PNMT G148A polymorphism; GNβ3 genotypes
Associated pathologies, habits, nutritional, and environmental factors Fabricatore et al45 PPWL: combined therapy (sibutramine + behavioral therapy)
ntPWL: distance from clinic
Finer et al29 NPWL: diabetes
Greenway78 NPWL: diabetes
Hainer et al24 PPWM: increase in protein intake; decrease in fat intake
ntPWM: 8 or 12 months of treatment
Hansen et al46 ntPWL: smoking history
LLoret-Linares et al37 NPWL: diabetes
Norris et al30 NPWL: diabetes
Peters et al25 ntPWL: postmenopausal state, hysterectomy, hormone replacement. Fiber intake, total caloric intake, total fat intake
Risser et al63 PPWL: priori authorization to have sibutramine as a prescription partially reimbursed (PAR)
Tankova et al59 NPWL: diabetes
van Baak et al48 PPWM: high levels of leisure-time physical activity
ntPWM: macronutrient composition of the diet during weight maintenance period

Abbreviations: NPWL, negative predictor of weight loss; NPWM, negative predictor of weight maintenance; ntPWL, not predictor of weight loss; ntPWM, not predictor of weight maintenance; PPWL, positive predictor of weight loss; PPWM, positive predictor of weight maintenance.

Psychological factors and eating behaviors

A study in 200327 demonstrated that patients with more deviating levels (elevated or lowered from the mean) of physical demand states (inborn and natural primary drives, including hunger) and dependency orientation (which implies preoccupation with oral activity such as eating and dependency on food, and which is typical of people vulnerable to social isolation) lost more weight when treated with sibutramine (r = 0.533, P = 0.002 and r = 0.478, P = 0.008, respectively). Initial signs of difficulties concerning physical demand states were strong positive predictors of weight loss (r = 0.533, P = 0.002), explaining 27% alone. These findings suggest that the drug could improve conscious control over instinctual drives; alternatively, it could increase the sensitivity to alterations in hunger and satiety, helping people with initial high levels of hunger urges to improve control on food intake. The enhanced satiety effect of sibutramine could also have helped patients with high oral dependency to give less importance to food and the support provided by being enrolled in a treatment program could have helped them to abstain from food.

In the same study,27 self-inspect ability (which means an ability to monitor and reflect on one’s behavior and thinking) was related to weight loss but was not a predictor.

Several studies24,28,35 have found that patients with more unrestrained eating (less cognitive control and conscious determination to resist eating, less strategic dieting) achieved greater weight loss, suggesting a negative influence of a pre-trial weight suppression on the subsequent treatment with sibutramine.24 At the same time, the increase in dietary restraint and the decrease in disinhibition score during weight reduction phase guaranteed the success of weight loss maintenance.24

Discordant results were obtained about the role of depression on weight loss. Two studies27,28 pointed out no correlations between depression and weight loss; two found a negative association between depression and weight loss;24,45 one35 showed depression as a positive predictor (r = 0.40, P < 0.05).

Demographic and anthropometric factors

Except for one study that pointed out a positive association between younger age and weight loss,35 age,27,45,46 and gender27,46 appeared to be unrelated to the ability to lose weight. According to the only study that considered the influence of race on weight loss,45 Caucasian ethnicity appeared a positive predictor (odds ratio [OR]: 0.42, P = 0.003). Two authors35,46 speculated that patients with higher pre-treatment body weight could achieve greater weight loss (r = 0.27, P < 0.001) because of their higher energy expenditure (resting metabolic rate) (r = 0.13, P = 0.003).46 Conversely, another study27 found no association between initial weight and weight loss at 6 months (r = −0.220, P = 0.242).

Familial obesity and personal weight history

One study27 pointed out the positive effect that the absence of familial obesity and having been normal weight at some points as an adult had on weight loss, even if these factors were not statistically selected as predictors (Student’s t-value = 3.239, P = 0.003; Student’s t-value = 2.194, P = 0.037 respectively). Conversely, Fabricatore et al45 obtained better results treating patients with a longer history of overweight. Hansen et al46 showed the number of previous slimming attempts and the age of onset of obesity had no influence on final weight loss.

Initial weight loss under treatment

Several studies24,27,29,4548 showed that early adherence to the program, early weight loss in the lead-in period and in the first 4 weeks of treatment were the strongest positive predictors of weight loss and maintenance, both in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Accordingly, sibutramine prescribing guidelines49 recommend physicians to increase the dose to 15 mg/day or discontinue treatment in patients who have not lost 2 kg in the first 4 weeks of treatment with the dose of 10 mg, and to avoid treatment beyond 12 weeks in people who fail to lose 5% of their initial body weight.

Genetic factors

Some authors focused on the effect that several genetic polymorphisms could have on weight loss and maintenance. Frey et al50 investigated the role of the G > A transition at position −1211 of the human G protein α-subunit gene (GNAS) promoter, showing that sibutramine was effective only in A carriers (P = 0.002) (GG genotypes showed no additional weight loss under sibutramine compared to placebo). G protein α-subunit is responsible for hormones coupling to the enzyme adenylyl-cyclase and is required in adipocytes for the lipolytic response to β adrenergic agonists.50

Four studies investigated GNB3, which encodes for the Gβ3 subunit of heteromeric G proteins (coupled to specific receptors, including serotonine and norepinephrine), key components of intracellular signal transduction, with a prominent role in body weight regulation. C825T (rs5443) polymorphism on exon 10 reduces lipolytic response to cathecolamines in fat cells51,52 and is associated with obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Hauner et al53 showed that sibutramine treatment was more effective in individuals with the CC genotype than in subjects with the TT/TC genotypes (weight loss: 7.2 ± 2.2 vs 4.1 ± 2.1 kg, P = 0.0013). In the CC group, the OR for a weight loss >5% (sibutramine vs placebo) was 6.6 (P = 0.004) and for a weight loss >10% was 9.6 (P = 0.010). This was in contrast with two studies47,54 showing that patients with TT/TC genotypes achieved better results than CC genotype (P = 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively), and another study44 pointing out no association between GNβ3 polymorphisms and weight loss.

One study25 focused on the positive association (P = 0.003) between weight loss and the homozygous variant (either G/G or A/A) G148A of PNMT (phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase) encoding for an adrenal enzyme catalyzing the conversion of norepinephrine to epinephrine55 but, in a second study, this result was not confirmed.44

Vazquez-Roque et al44 investigated also the role of “short” (S) and “long” (L) repeats in the 5-HTT-linked region of the promoter of gene SLC6A4 (solute carrier family 6, member 4; chromosome 17q11.1–q12) encoding for the soluble serotonin transporter56 and pointed out the positive effect of SLC6A4 LS/SS genotype on weight loss (subjects with SLC6A4 LS/SS genotype had an average weight loss of 6.1 ± 1.0 kg, compared with a 0.1 ± 0.9 kg average weight increase with placebo; subject with SLC6A4 LL genotype showed an average weight loss of 3.3 ± 1.8 kg on placebo, compared with 3.9 ± 1.6 kg weight loss in sibutramine group).

Grudell et al47 found the positive effect of the association of TC/TT genotype of C825T polymorphism of GNβ3 gene and the CC genotype of α2A adrenoreceptor C1291G polymorphism or the 5HTTLPR LS/SS genotype.

Very recently, Hsiao et al57 used the same patients in which they had investigated the role of GNβ3 polymorphism54 to study the role of −866G/A polymorphism on weight loss in patients treated with sibutramine. The uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) gene encodes a mitochondrial transporter protein, which is highly expressed in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and pancreatic islets.58 A strong effect of sibutramine on weight loss was observed in individuals with the AA, GA, and AA + GA genotypes (P = 0.019, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively) whereas the drug caused no significant effect in individuals with the GG genotype (P = 0.063). For the combination of UCP2 AA + GA with GNβ3 TT + TC (carriers of at least one variant allele for each polymorphism), the P-value for treatment effects on weight loss was <0.001. In contrast, no effects were observed in patients with the wild type genotype combination of UCP2 GG and GNβ3. A significant (P < 0.001) gene interaction between UCP2 and GNβ3 was identified by a 2-locus model.

Associated pathologies, habits, nutritional, and environmental factors

Diabetes represents the chronic disease that most often is associated with obesity. Weight loss improves glycemic control and can be achieved using pharmacological therapy.30,37,59 However in diabetic patients weight management is more challenging, in part because of the weight-promoting effects of the majority of anti-diabetic drugs37 and, on average, is achieved slower and less (up to 69%) than in nondiabetic patients.29,30,37,59 This final aspect is recognized by the Australian regulatory authorities who suggest to withdraw sibutramine after 3 months in nondiabetic patients who have failed to lose 5% of their initial body weight but after 6 months in diabetic patients.60

On the other side, estrogen levels (ie, menopause, hormone replacement), hysterectomy,25 and smoking habit46 were demonstrated to not have a significant effect on weight loss in response to sibutramine.

The addition of behavioral therapy45 or high leisure-time physical activity48 to sibutramine showed a strong favorable effect on weight loss and maintenance, while dietetic modifications in fat, protein, and fiber intake24,25 during the treatment, and the choice of 8 vs 12 months period of treatment24 did not have a great impact on outcomes. This is in accordance with most of studies on antiobesity drugs that demonstrate that the maximum weight loss is achieved after 6–8 months, whereas after 12–16 months of treatment, minor weight regain usually occurs.61,62

A priori authorization to have sibutramine partially reimbursed improved patients’ compliance and weight loss.63 Distance to the clinic was marginally related to treatment success.45

Predictors associated with mazindol treatments

Mazindol is a centrally acting drug that blocks the reuptake of norepinephrine by presynaptic neurons, increasing nor-epinephrine levels within the synaptic cleft (Table 5). The result is the stimulation of the β2 adrenergic receptors in the lateral hypothalamus and the inhibition of feeding.11 It also inhibits gastric acid and insulin secretion, and increases locomotor activity.64

Table 5.

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance in patients treated with mazindol

Author, year Predictors
Psychosocial factors and eating behaviors Rodin et al41 PPWL: high levels of social conformity; belief that poor eating habits are crucial in producing obesity
NPWL: high levels of responsiveness to external, non-food relevant stimuli; belief that hereditary or physical factors are causes of primary importance in producing overweight
ntPWL: self-esteem and self-concept; emotional stability; extraversion; internal locus of control.
Womble et al65 NPWL: high levels of dietary restraint, perceived hunger and trait anxiety; small perceived body size
Genetic predictors Shimizu and Mori66 NPWL: Trp64Arg mutation of GNβ3 gene (vs Trp64Trp)
Shimizu et al67

Abbreviations: NPWL, negative predictor of weight loss; NPWM, negative predictor of weight maintenance; ntPWL, not predictor of weight loss; ntPWM, not predictor of weight maintenance; PPWL, positive predictor of weight loss; PPWM, positive predictor of weight maintenance.

Psychosocial factors and eating behavior

A study in 197741 found that high social conformity and emotional stability, extraversion, and need for social acceptance improved patients’ adhesion to the program, whereas no personality characteristic predicted weight loss.

According to a more recent study,65 high levels of hunger, anxiety, and dietary restraint, and small perceived body size had a negative influence on weight loss in patients treated with mazindol. Suggested explanations for these findings were the drug incapability of controlling extreme levels of hunger, the limited slimming possibility in patients dieting before entering the treatment, and the individual lacking perception of the need for weight loss.

Genetic factors

Two studies66,67 pointed out a significantly greater body weight reduction in subjects with the Trp64 Trp allele than in those with Trp64Arg allele of ADRβ3 gene (encoding for a protein which regulates cathecolamine-induced lipolysis68 mainly expressed in white adipose tissue) (6.9 ± 1.0 kg vs 3.6 ± 0.7 kg in the first study and 8.4 ± 1.7 kg vs 3.7 ± 0.8 kg in the second study; P < 0.05).

Predictors associated with topiramate treatment

Topiramate is an anticonvulsant drug acting on sodium and calcium T-type channels (Table 6). The way in which it could promote weight loss is still unknown. Some authors have shown an increase in extraneuronal levels of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in the hippocampus and have speculated that a similar effect in the hypopthalamus could explain topiramate action as an appetite suppressor.69 Other studies have demonstrated an increase in fat metabolism (through the increased activity of lipoprotein lipase in adipose tissue and promotion of hepatic fat metabolism and decreased fatty acid synthesis)70,71 and the inhibition of lipogenesis through the inhibition of carbonic anhydrase II and V.72

Table 6.

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance in patients treated with topiramate

Author, year Predictors
Demographic and anthropometric factors Alberici et al77 ntPWL: gender; initial BMI
Theisen et al74 PPWL: high initial BMI
Ben-Menachem et al75 PPWL: high initial BMI
Klein et al76 PPWL: high initial BMI and body fat
Eating behavior Klein et al76 PPWL: reduction in hunger at 3 months

Abbreviations: ntPWL, not predictor of weight loss; PPWL, positive predictor of weight loss.

A recent meta-analysis9 based on studies conducted on epileptic patients reported an average placebo-subtracted weight loss of 6.5% in topiramate-treated patients (P < 0.001). Adverse effects are paresthesia, changes in taste, dizziness, memory impairment, insomnia, and somnolence.9,73

Demographic and anthropometric factors

Three studies7476 pointed out a correlation between higher initial BMI and a greater weight loss (P < 0.001) in epileptic patients treated with topiramate for a period of 10 weeks to 6 months. Only one study77 conducted on migraine patients treated for 4 months found no correlation between initial BMI, gender, and total weight loss (P = 0.44).

Eating behavior

One study76 reported a positive (P = 0.002) association between a reduction in hunger after 3 months of treatment and total weight loss at month 6.

Results

Our analysis pointed out the overall paucity of reliable predictors of weight loss and maintenance associated with pharmacological antiobesity treatments, a characteristic previously described by studies focusing on lifestyle modification treatments.18,19

Indeed, among all considered factors, the early response to treatment was demonstrated to be a sure positive predictor of weight loss and maintenance. Conversely, diabetes appeared to have a strong negative impact on patients’ ability to lose weight when treated with the different drugs.

A more unrestrained eating at baseline and high levels of determination and self-discipline appeared to be positive predictors of outcome in patients treated with sibutramine and orlistat, respectively, even if the statistical association was less strong.

For all other considered variables, published data are not sufficient to define their role on final outcomes.

Conclusion

Limitations related both to the disease and to the intervention program could explain these inconclusive and often conflicting results. Indeed, the multitude of factors involved in obesity’s development and weight loss, and their complex interactions make each patient different from the other and the investigation of reliable predictors particularly challenging. Furthermore psycho-behavioral difficulties experienced by patients when starting a new treatment, and the lack of significant results often associated with the different therapies, are responsible for the high levels of attrition of patients from the weight-loss programs.

At the same time, our analysis pointed out important limitations related to currently available literature investigating outcomes associated to antiobesity pharmacological treatments. First of all, few studies have been conducted with the primary aim to point out the role of specific factors on weight loss and maintenance. Second, a minor part of these studies have included a large cohort of patients. Third, studies are very heterogeneous from the point of view of the number and characteristics of patients included, the duration and type of program, and the tests and parameters used for patients’ evaluation. Finally, very often, the analysis and interpretation of the achieved results are very difficult and the power of the associations is reduced because of the limited number of subjects included.

Probably, the enrollment of a greater number of patients in future trials, the use of common protocols of treatment and parameters (for each category of predictors) to assess final outcomes could improve statistical significance of results and the ability to compare data. Moreover, because both obesity onset and weight loss are dependent on the interaction of a great number of different factors, it could be important to test different categories of predictors on the same group of patients.

Despite the above mentioned difficulties and the discouraging results obtained until recently, we believe that, because of obesity’s social and medical impact and the availability of new promising antiobesity drugs (whose mechanisms of action are very often similar to those of old drugs; the most promising one is the association of bupropion and naltrexone),79 the search for reliable predictors of outcome associated to antiobesity treatments has to be supported and encouraged.

Being able to find reliable predictors of successful outcome for pharmacological treatments would mean to give prescribing physicians, patients, and the authorities a tool for antiobesity drug management.

Footnotes

Disclosure

No conflicts of interest were declared in relation to this paper.

References

  • 1.James WP. The epidemiology of obesity: the size of the problem. J Intern Med. 2008;263(4):336–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01922.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stein CJ, Colditz GA. The epidemic of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2522–2525. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rankinen T, Zuberi A, Chagnon YC, et al. The human obesity gene map: the 2005 update. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(4):529–644. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: 2000. Report of a WHO consultation. Technical Report Series 894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsigos C, Hainer V, Basdevant A, et al. Management of obesity in adults: European clinical practice guidelines. Obes Facts. 2008;1(2):106–116. doi: 10.1159/000126822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.US Food and Drug Administration News Release. FDA expands use of banding system for weight loss. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm245617.htm. Accessed 23 May, 2011.
  • 7.Halpern A, Mancini MC. Treatment of obesity: an update on anti-obesity medications. Obes Rev. 2003;4(1):25–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2003.00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ioannides-Demos LL, Proietto J, McNeil JJ. Pharmacotherapy for obesity. Drugs. 2005;65(10):1391–1418. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565100-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Z, Maglione M, Tu W, et al. Meta-analysis: pharmacologic treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):532–546. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dubnov-Raz G, Berry EM. The dietary treatment of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37(4):873–886. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clifton PM. Dietary treatment for obesity. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;5(12):672–681. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sodlerlund A, Fischer A, Johansson T. Physical activity, diet and behaviour modification in the treatment of overweight and obese adults: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health. 2009;129(3):132–142. doi: 10.1177/1757913908094805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ioannides-Demos LL, Piccenna L, McNeil JJ. Pharmacotherapies for obesity: past, current, and future therapies. J Obes. 2011;2011:179674. doi: 10.1155/2011/179674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leff DR, Heath D. Surgery for obesity in adulthood. BMJ. 2009;339:b3402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baker MK, Byrne TK, Feldmann ME. Surgical treatment of obesity. Prim Care. 2009;36(2):417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seaton DA, Rose K. Defaulters from a weight reduction clinic. J Chronic Dis. 1965;18(10):1007–1011. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Silverstone JT, Solomon T. Psychiatric and somatic factors in the treatment of obesity. J Psychosom Res. 1965;9(3):249–255. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(65)90050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Teixeira PJ, Going SB, Sardinha LB, Lohman TG. A review of psychosocial pre-treatment predictors of weight control. Obes Rev. 2005;6(1):43–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elfhag K, Rossner S. Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obes Rev. 2005;6(1):67–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moreno-Aliaga MJ, Santos JL, Marti A, Martinez JA. Does weight loss prognosis depend on genetic make-up? Obes Rev. 2005;6(2):155–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, Hebebrand J, Senf W. Do psychosocial variables predict weight loss or mental health after obesity surgery? A systematic review. Obes Res. 2004;12(10):1554–1569. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kral JG. Selection of patients for anti-obesity surgery. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(Suppl 1):S107–S112. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brownell KD. Behavioral, psychological, and environmental predictors of obesity and success at weight reduction. Int J Obes. 1984;8(5):543–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hainer V, Kunesova M, Bellisle F, Hill M, Braunerova R, Wagenknecht M. Psychobehavioral and nutritional predictors of weight loss in obese women treated with sibutramine. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29(2):208–216. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peters WR, MacMurry JP, Walker J, Giese RJ, Jr, Comings DE. Phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase G-148A genetic variant and weight loss in obese women. Obes Res. 2003;11(3):415–419. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rissanen A, Lean M, Rossner S, Segal KR, Sjostrom L. Predictive value of early weight loss in obesity management with orlistat: an evidence-based assessment of prescribing guidelines. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(1):103–109. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elfhag K, Rossner S, Carlsson AM, Barkeling B. Sibutramine treatment in obesity: predictors of weight loss including rorschach personality data. Obes Res. 2003;11(11):1391–1399. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Elfhag K, Rossner S, Barkeling B, Rooth P. Sibutramine treatment in obesity: initial eating behaviour in relation to weight loss results and changes in mood. Pharmacol Res. 2005;51(2):159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Finer N, Ryan DH, Renz CL, Hewkin AC. Prediction of response to sibutramine therapy in obese non-diabetic and diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8(2):206–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Norris SL, Zhang X, Avenell A, Gregg E, Schmid CH, Lau J. Pharmacotherapy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD004096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004096.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ullrich A, Erdmann J, Margraf J, Schusdziarra V. Impact of carbohydrate and fat intake on weight-reducing efficacy of orlistat. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(8):1007–1013. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guerciolini R. Mode of action of orlistat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997;21(Suppl 3):S12–S23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rucker D, Padwal R, Li SK, Curioni C, Lau DC. Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335(7631):1194–1199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39385.413113.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Early communication about an ongoing safety review orlistat (marketed as Alli and Xenical) FDA; Silver Spring, MD: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elfhag K, Finer N, Rossner S. Who will lose weight on sibutramine and orlistat? Psychological correlates for treatment success. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(6):498–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.European Agency for Evaluation of Medical Products Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Xenical. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000154/WC500058428.pdf. 2011.
  • 37.Lloret-Linares C, Greenfield JR, Czernichow S. Effect of weight-reducing agents on glycaemic parameters and progression to type 2 diabetes: a review. Diabet Med. 2008;25(10):1142–1450. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Toplak H, Ziegler O, Keller U, et al. X-PERT: weight reduction with orlistat in obese subjects receiving a mildly or moderately reduced-energy diet: early response to treatment predicts weight maintenance. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005;7(6):699–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11000/30365/30365.pdf. 2006. [PubMed]
  • 40.Malone M, Alger-Mayer SA. Pharmacist intervention enhances adherence to orlistat therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37(11):1598–1602. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rodin J, Bray GA, Atkinson RL, et al. Predictors of successful weight loss in an outpatient obesity clinic. Int J Obes. 1977;1(1):79–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lean ME. How does sibutramine work? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(Suppl 4):S8–S11. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hansen DL, Toubro S, Stock MJ, Macdonald IA, Astrup A. The effect of sibutramine on energy expenditure and appetite during chronic treatment without dietary restriction. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(10):1016–1024. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vazquez Roque MI, Camilleri M, Clark MM, et al. Alteration of gastric functions and candidate genes associated with weight reduction in response to sibutramine. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(7):829–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Moore RH, Butryn ML, Heymsfield SB, Nguyen AM. Predictors of attrition and weight loss success: results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(8):685–691. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hansen D, Astrup A, Toubro S, et al. Predictors of weight loss and maintenance during 2 years of treatment by sibutramine in obesity. Results from the European multi-centre STORM trial. Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(4):496–501. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grudell AB, Sweetser S, Camilleri M, et al. A controlled pharmacogenetic trial of sibutramine on weight loss and body composition in obese or overweight adults. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(4):1142–1154. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Baak MA, van ME, Astrup AV, et al. Leisure-time activity is an important determinant of long-term weight maintenance after weight loss in the Sibutramine Trial on Obesity Reduction and Maintenance (STORM trial) Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(2):209–214. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.US and European prescribing information. Abbott Laboratories. 2010.
  • 50.Frey UH, Hauner H, Jockel KH, Manthey I, Brockmeyer N, Siffert W. A novel promoter polymorphism in the human gene GNAS affects binding of transcription factor upstream stimulatory factor 1, Galphas protein expression and body weight regulation. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008;18(2):141–151. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f49964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Danoviz ME, Pereira AC, Mill JG, Krieger JE. Hypertension, obesity and GNB 3 gene variants. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33(3):248–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ryden M, Faulds G, Hoffstedt J, Wennlund A, Arner P. Effect of the (C825T) Gbeta(3) polymorphism on adrenoceptor-mediated lipolysis in human fat cells. Diabetes. 2002;51(5):1601–1608. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hauner H, Meier M, Jockel KH, Frey UH, Siffert W. Prediction of successful weight reduction under sibutramine therapy through genotyping of the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3) C825T polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13(8):453–459. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200308000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hsiao DJ, Wu LS, Huang SY, Lin E. Weight loss and body fat reduction under sibutramine therapy in obesity with the C825T polymorphism in the GNB3 gene. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19(9):730–733. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283307cf1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wong DL, Lesage A, Siddall B, Funder JW. Glucocorticoid regulation of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase in vivo. FASEB J. 1992;6(14):3310–3315. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.14.1426768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, et al. Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem. 1996;66(6):2621–2624. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66062621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hsiao TJ, Wu LS, Hwang Y, Huang SY, Lin E. Effect of the common −866G/A polymorphism of the uncopling protein 2 gene on weight loss and body composition under sibutramine therapy in an obese Taiwanese population. Mol Diagn Ther. 2010;14(2):101–106. doi: 10.1007/BF03256359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dalgaard LT, Pedersen O. Uncoupling proteins: functional characteristics and role in the pathogenesis of obesity and type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001;44(8):946–965. doi: 10.1007/s001250100596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tankova T, Dakovska G, Lazarova M, Dakovska L, Kirilov G, Koev D. Sibutramine in the treatment of obesity in type 2 diabetic patients and in nondiabetic subjects. Acta Diabetol. 2004;41(4):146–153. doi: 10.1007/s00592-004-0158-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Reductil (sibutramine hydrochloride) Australian prescribing information. Abbott Australasia Pty Ltd. March 5, 2004.
  • 61.James WP, Astrup A, Finer N, et al. Effect of sibutramine on weight maintenance after weight loss: a randomised trial. STORM Study Group. Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance. Lancet. 2000;356(9248):2119–2125. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03491-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sjostrom L, Rissanen A, Andersen T, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9123):167–172. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11509-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Risser JA, Vash PD, Nieto L. Does prior authorization of sibutramine improve medication compliance or weight loss? Obes Res. 2005;13(1):86–92. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Inoue S. Clinical studies with mazindol. Obes Res. 1995;(3 Suppl 4):549S–552S. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Womble LG, Williamson DA, Greenway FL, Redmann SM. Psychological and behavioral predictors of weight loss during drug treatment for obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(3):340–345. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shimizu H, Mori M. Trp64Arg mutation of beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene determines weight losing effect of mazindol. Obes Res. 2004;12(Suppl):A37. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shimizu H, Tsuchiya T, Oh-I S, Ohtani K-I, Okada S, Mori M. Incidence of beta3-adrenergic receptor polymorphism and prediction of successful weight reduction with mazindol therapy in severely obese Japanese subjects. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2007;1:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schiffelers SL, Saris WH, Boomsma F, van Baak MA. beta(1)- and beta(2)-Adrenoceptor-mediated thermogenesis and lipid utilization in obese and lean men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(5):2191–2199. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yamamura S, Hamaguchi T, Ohoyama K, et al. Topiramate and zonisamide prevent paradoxical intoxication induced by carbamazepine and phenytoin. Epilepsy Res. 2009;84:172–186. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Richard D, Ferland J, Lalonde J, Samson P, Deshaies Y. Influence of topiramate in the regulation of energy balance. Nutrition. 2000;16:961–966. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00452-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Liang Y, She P, Wang X, Demarest K. The messenger RNA profiles in liver, hypothalamus, white adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of female Zucker diabetic fatty rats after topiramate treatment. Metabolism. 2006;55:1411–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.De Simone G, Di Fiore A, Supuran CT. Are carbonic anhydrase inhibitors suitable for obtaining antiobesity drugs? Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:655–660. doi: 10.2174/138161208783877820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rosenstock J, Hollander P, Gadde K, Sun X, Strauss R, Leung A. A randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate controlled release in the treatment of obese type 2 diabetic patients. Diab Care. 2007;30:1480–1486. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Theisen FM, Beyenburg S, Gebhardt S, et al. A prospective study of body weight and serum leptin levels in patients treated with topiramate. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008;31(4):226–230. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318157c5ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ben-Menachem E, Axelsen M, Johanson EH, Stagge A, Smith U. Predictors of weight loss in adults with topiramate-treated epilepsy. Obes Res. 2003;11(4):556–562. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Klein KM, Theisen F, Knake S, et al. Topiramate, nutrition and weight change: a prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(590):593. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.136929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Alberici A, Borroni B, Manelli F, et al. Topiramate weight loss in migraine patients. J Neurol Sci. 2009;278(1–2):64–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Greenway F. Obesity medications and the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 1999;1(3):277–287. doi: 10.1089/152091599317198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Plodkowski RA, et al. COR-I Study Group Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):595–605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60888-4. Erratum in: Lancet. 2010;376(9741):594. Lancet. 2010;376(9750):1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES