Abstract
DAP-related apoptotic kinase-2 (DRAK2), a DAP kinase family member, is highly expressed in B and T lymphocytes in the human and the mouse. To determine whether DRAK2 plays a role in B cell activation and differentiation, we analyzed germinal centers (GCs) and the specific antibody response to NP in drak2−/− mice immunized with the thymus-dependent (TD) conjugated hapten NP16-CGG. In drak2−/− mice, spleen GCs were normal in size and morphology, but their number was reduced by as much as five-fold, as compared to their wild-type littermates. This was not due to a defect in B cell proliferation, as the BrdU uptake was comparable in DRAK2-deficient and wild-type B cells. Rather, the proportion of apoptotic GC B and T cells in drak2−/− mice was significantly higher than that in wild-type control mice, as shown by 7-AAD and TUNEL staining. In drak2−/− mice, the generation of high affinity IgG antibodies was impaired in spite of the seemingly normal somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch DNA recombination (CSR) machineries in drak2−/− B cells. In NP16-CGG-immunized drak2−/− mice, T cell-intrinsic Bcl-xL transgene expression increased the number of GCs and rescued the high affinity IgG response to NP. These findings suggest a novel role for DRAK2 in regulating the GC reaction and the response to TD antigens, perhaps through increased survival of T cells and enhanced B cell positive selection. They also suggest that DRAK2-deficiency is not involved in regulating intrinsic B cell apoptosis.
Keywords: B cells, antibodies, spleen and germinal centers, molecular biology, transgenic/knockout mice
Introduction
DRAK2 belongs to the DAP (death-associated protein) kinase family of pro-apoptotic serine/threonine kinases [1]. All five members of this family (DAP kinase, DAPK2, ZIP kinase, DRAK1 and DRAK2) share a homology of the sequence restricted to their N- terminal kinase domain [2]. The C-terminal regions, however, are diverse and implicated in specific signal transduction pathways. DAP kinases are involved in both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways [3] and DRAK2 was shown to induce apoptosis upon overexpression in several human tumor-derived cell lines [4]. DAP kinases are localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus [3]; in COS-7 (human), Caco-2 (human), NIH 3T3 (mouse) and NRK (rat) cells, DRAK2 is primarily localized in the nucleus [5–7], and in ACL-15 (rat) cells, primarily in the cytoplasm [7]. In non-stimulated Jurkat T cells, a stably expressed DRAK2-GFP fusion protein was shown to be localized in the nucleus [5]. However, upon stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and phytohemagglutin (PHA), two signals mimicking the antigenic stimulation of T cell receptors (TCRs), DRAK2-GFP was exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [5], suggesting a potential regulatory mechanism for DRAK2 activities in T cells. Further, a C-terminal truncated DRAK2 mutant, which possesses an intact N-terminal kinase domain, is localized to the cytoplasm but fails to induce apoptosis in NIH 3T3 cells, suggesting that the C terminus of DRAK2 is required for its nuclear localization and induction of apoptosis [5, 7]. Finally, in T cell line Jurkat, primary thymocytes as well as resting B cells, DRAK2 is autophosphorylated at Ser12 upon antigen receptor stimulation and its kinase activity is regulated by intracellular calcium mobilization [8].
DRAK2 shares 52% homology with the DAP kinase, which was found to associate with TNFα receptor and Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD) to inhibit apoptosis [9]. DRAK2 has been suggested to plays a role in UV-induced apoptosis [7] and its overexpression in NIH 3T3 cells or in transgenic T cells induces apoptosis [1, 10]. However, ectopic expression of DRAK2 in NIH 3T3 cells or primary T cells using retroviral transduction did not promote apoptosis [5]. Further, DRAK2-deficient T cells showed no apparent defects in the apoptosis regulation upon stimulation in vitro with peptide-pulsed antigen presenting cells (APCs), an agonistic anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb), anti-Fas mAb, dexamethasone, staurosporine, etoposide or γ-irradiation [11]. In addition, drak2−/− mice showed resistance to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [11]. However, DRAK2 was found to be dispensable for the T cell recruitment into the central nervous system (CNS) following infection of mice with mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), suggesting that the EAE resistance in drak2−/− mice was not due to an altered T cell trafficking in CNS [12]. Furthermore, drak2−/− memory T cells specific for MHV resulted in an accelerated clearance of MHV from the brain when transferred into MHV-infected Rag1−/− mice, suggesting an important role for DRAK2 in regulating protective immunity against viral pathogens [13].
A potential role of DRAK2 in modulating T cell activation and survival is relevant to the dynamics of the GC reaction and the events that orchestrate the generation of the antibody response [14, 15]. GC formation is distinctive of T cell-dependent immune responses [16, 17] and the GC reaction is critical for the generation of mature immune responses involving high affinity, class-switched antibodies, and plasma cells and memory B cells [18]. The generation of B cells expressing high affinity and class-switched antibodies is achieved through three sequential steps in the GC. It starts with the activation of B cells by primed T helper (Th) cells, resulting in rapid B cell proliferation and clonal expansion, which generate a diverse B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire for antigen through active SHM and CSR [19]. Next, B cells bearing mutated BCRs with high affinity for antigen are positively selected by follicular dentritic cells (FDC) through an antigen-dependent mechanism [20–25]. Finally, the positively selected B cells are provided a survival signals by Th cells to differentiate into plasma and memory B cells, which have the capacity to produce high affinity class-switched antibodies [26, 27].
Despite accumulating evidence that DRAK2 is involved in T cell signaling and autoimmunity [5, 8, 10], little is known about its role in the development of a specific antibody response. Here, we used DRAK2-deficient B cells and DRAK2-deficient mice to address the role of DRAK2 in the maturation of the antibody response. Our findings suggest important roles for DRAK2 in the development of GCs and the generation of high affinity and class-switched antibodies to TD antigens.
Materials and Methods
Mice and Immunization
Generation of Drak2−/− mice were previously described [11]. The Bcl-xL transgene was generated by the insertion of the human Bcl-xL cDNA downstream of the lck proximal promoter [28]. Mice used in the experiments were backcrossed to C57Bl/6 for at least six generations and were between 8 and 12 weeks of age and without apparent pathological symptoms. For immunization, mice were intraperitoneally injected with a TD antigen, 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-chicken gamma globulin (NP16-CGG) (Biosearch Technologies, Novato, CA) (100μg) mixed with alum (Pierce, Rockford, IL) (100 μl). In some cases, three weeks later, a second intraperitoneal injection of NP16-CGG (100 μg) was given as a boost. Mice were housed in a pathogen-free environment and all the protocols were in accordance to the rules and regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California, Irvine, CA.
Immunofluorescence studies
Spleens from immunized and non-immunized mice were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) (Sakura Finetek Inc., Torrance, CA), snap-frozen and stored at −80° C. Seven-μm thick cryostat sections were fixed using cold acetone and stored at −80° C for 25 min. Acetone fixed sections were then air dried for 20 min. at room temperature. Sections were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA) (E-Y Laboratories, San Mateo, CA) as a GC cell marker (1:100 dilution) and kept in the dark for 1 hour, before being washed with PBS and then permeabilized using freshly prepared 0.1 %Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium citrate for 10 min. After washing with PBS, sections were allowed to dry for 10 min before adding anti-mouse DRAK2 mAb conjugated with phycoerythrin (PE-anti-DRAK2 mAb) (Cell Signaling Technology Inc. Boston, MA) and allowed to incubate for 1 hour at 37° C. Sections were then washed with PBS and viewed under a fluorescence microscope. For GC analysis, 200 μl staining solution of PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45R (B220) mAb (RA3-6B2) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as a B cell marker (1: 200 dilution), and FITC-PNA were applied to the acetone fixed sections and kept in the dark at room temperature for 1 hour. The stained sections were washed using PBS and mounted using anti-fade reagent (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) for analysis. TUNEL staining was used to visualize apoptotic cells in GCs under a fluorescence microscope and was performed by first staining cryostat 7-μm thick spleen sections with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-B220 mAb. Sections we incubated at room temperature for 1 hour in the dark washed with PBS and allowed to dry for 15 min. They were then permeabilized using freshly prepared 0.1 % Triton X-100 plus 0.1% sodium citrate for 10 min before being washed with PBS and allowed to dry for 10 min. TUNEL mix (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was then applied to the sections and allowed to incubate for 1 hour in 37 °C in the dark. Sections were then washed with PBS and viewed under a fluorescence microscope. SPOT Software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI) was used to view and analyze images.
In vitro B cell proliferation
Proliferation was analyzed by CellTrace™ carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) Cell Proliferation Kit (Invitrogen Corp.). Spleen single cell suspensions were washed in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) and resuspended at 1 × 106/ml. Resuspended cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 10 min., after addition of 2 μM CFSE. Stained cells were suspended in ice-cold culture media, followed by a 5 min. incubation on ice. Cells were then pelleted and washed by HBSS before being cultured in the presence of nil or LPS (from E. coli, serotype 055:B5, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) and rmIL-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). After culture, B cells were harvested at different time points and analyzed using a FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer.
In vivo B cell proliferation and apoptosis
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with NP16-CGG. After seven days, they were injected with BrdU (1 mg), and again 16 hours later. Mice were then sacrificed 4 hours from the last injection. Spleen cells were stained with PE-anti-B220 mAb and FITC-PNA. Cells were then fixed and incubated with the permeablization buffer for 15 min in a dark at 4 °C, and then stained with APC-conjugated anti-BrdU mAb using the BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences). Cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. To measure apoptosis, B cells from immunized mice were stained with 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) or Annexin V (BD Biosciences) in combination with PE-anti-B220 mAb or PE-anti-CD3 mAb and FITC-PNA and incubated for 30 min. at 4 °C in the dark. Cells were then washed and analyzed using a FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. TUNEL staining was also used to quantify apoptosis by counting TUNEL signals (red dots) using the SPOT Software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.).
In vitro CSR assays
B cells were isolated from red blood cell depleted splenocytes from non-intentionally immunized mice, and then cultured at 106 cell/ml in FCS-RPMI medium with 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol. B cells were then stimulated in duplicate six plate wells with (i) nil, (ii) LPS (10 μg/ml), for CSR to IgG3 and (iii) LPS with rmIL-4 (2 ng/ml) for CSR to IgG1. Cells were collected on day 4 for FACS® analysis of surface Ig expression [10].
PCR amplification of Ig intronic VHJ558DJH4-iEμ DNA
DNA was amplified from Payer’s patch B cells of NP16-CGG immunized mice. The intronic VHJ558DJH4-iEμ DNA downstream of rearranged VHDJH was amplified using semi-nested specific PCR [29]. Primers were 5′-GCCTGACATCTGAGGACTCTGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCTCCAGTTTCGGCTGAATCC-3′ (reverse) and 5′-TGAGACCGAGGCTAGATGCC-3′ (reverse). PCR reaction conditions for the first round were 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1.5 min, 72 °C for 2 min for 30 cycles, and for the second-round PCR were 94 °C for 45 s, 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min for 30 cycles. Platinum Pfx DNA polymerase® (Invitrogen Corp.) was used for all DNA and cDNA amplifications. PCR products were cloned into the pCR-TOPO™ vector (Invitrogen Corp.) and sequenced.
Total and NP3-specific IgM and IgG1 titrations
NP3-specific IgM and IgG1, and total IgM and IgG1 levels in drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice were measured using specific ELISAs. Mice where immunized with NP16-CGG and boosted at day 21. Serum was collected 7 days after the boost. To measure the serum levels of NP3-specific IgM and IgG1, 96-well plates were coated with NP3-BSA. Mouse sera were diluted 1:3000 and added 100 μl to the wells. After incubation at 37° C for 2 hours and washing, biotin-labeled anti-IgM or anti-IgG1 Ab was added to the wells for 1 hour. After a 1-hour incubation, horseradish peroxidase-labeled streptavidin was added to the wells for 1 hour. After 20 min. incubation with OPD substrate, the reaction was stopped with sulphuric acid and absorbance was measured at 492 nm.
Results
Impaired GC development in drak2−/− mice
By examining the gene expression atlas of the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (www.expression.gnf.org), we found DRAK2 mRNA to be highly expressed in lymphoid organs, more particularly in both B and T cells. DRAK2 protein expression is highest in B220+ B cells, while it is nil in spleen dendritic cells (DCs) [11]. The high expression of DRAK2 in B cells of secondary lymphoid organs, specifically the spleen, has suggested a role of DRAK2 in the antibody response. To explore this possibility, we immunized mice with the TD NP16-CGG conjugated hapten and examined GC formation and DRAK2 expression. GCs were identified as clusters of PNAhi cells (Figure 1A) [30, 31] or PNAhiB220+ cells (Figure 1B). By staining spleen sections with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-mouse Drak2 mAb, we found DRAK2 to be specifically expressed within GCs of wild-type, but not DRAK2-deficient, mice (Figure 1A).
Figure 1.
Impaired GC development in drak2−/− mice. (A) Spleen sections from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization were stained with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-DRAK2 mAb. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed expression of DRAK2 protein in GCs of Drak2+/+ mice, but not drak2−/− mice (original magnification: 200×). (B) Spleen sections from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization were stained with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-B220 mAb, and subjected to immunofluorescence microscopy. The number of GCs (B220+PNAhi) was determined by counting visible GCs under the microscope. In each spleen section, the number GCs was smaller in drak2−/− mice than in Drak2+/+ mice (original magnification: 40×). (C) FACS analysis of the number of B220+PNAhi cells showed a two-fold decrease in the number of GC B cells in drak2−/− mice as compared to Drak2+/+ mice 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization. (D) Number of GCs per spleen section in drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice at different days after NP16-CGG immunization.
To investigate the potential role of DRAK2 in GC development, we isolated spleens from mice immunized with NP16-CGG at days 0, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21 and 28, and stained spleen sections with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-B220 mAb to analyze GC development in drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice. drak2−/− GCs were normal in morphology and size, but their number was significantly reduced, about one third of that in wild-type control mice at day 14 after immunization (Figure 1B). The defective GC development was associated with a two-fold reduction in the number of GC B cells (B220+PNAhi) in drak2−/− mice (Figure 1C). Further, in wild-type mice, the highest GC numbers were found between days 14 and 18 (Figure 1D) [32]. In drak2−/− mice, the GC number peaked at day 7, but this was only 50% of that in their Drak2+/+ littermates. Overall, drak2−/− mice showed a two- to five-fold reduction in the number of GCs. Thus, drak2−/− mice displayed a severely impaired GC reaction in the TD antibody response to NP16-CGG.
drak2−/− B cells proliferate normally in vivo and in vitro
Impairment of B cell proliferation has been shown to impair GC development [25, 33]. To determine whether impaired GC development in drak2−/− mice was the result of a deficiency in B cell proliferation, we performed in vitro proliferation assays using CFSE-labeled B cells that were induced to proliferate by LPS or CD154 plus IL-4 [34]. These experiments revealed comparable proliferation rates in drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ B cells (Figure 2A, B). We also investigated B cell proliferation in vivo using BrdU incorporation in GC B cells of drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 7 days after immunization with NP16-CGG. drak2−/− GC B cells did not display any defect in proliferation, as BrdU uptake by these cells in vivo was comparable to that of wild-type control GC B cells (Figure 2C). No BrdU uptake was observed in non-immunized control mice (data not shown). Thus, the reduction in GC numbers in drak2−/− mice was not due to an intrinsic defect in B cell proliferation.
Figure 2.
Normal proliferation of drak2−/− B cell in vitro and in vivo. Spleen B cells from drak2−/− mice were cultured with LPS plus IL-4 (A) or CD154 plus IL-4 (B) after being labeled with CFSE to track their division. After 1, 2, 3 and 4 days of culture, cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry. Peaks represent sequential halvings of CFSE fluorescence and reflect cell divisions. drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ B cells exhibited a similar CFSE pattern, indicating B cells proliferation is not defective. (C) Cell proliferation in vivo, as analyzed by BrdU incorporated in B220+PNAhi GC B cells from spleen of NP16-CGG immunized mice. Seven days after immunization, mice were injected twice with BrdU within 16 hours and sacrificed 4 hours after the second injection. Spleen cells were stained with PE- anti-mouse B220 mAb, FITC-PNA and APC-anti-BrdU mAb. No significant difference was observed in the number of BrdU-positive B220+PNAhi GC B cells from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice.
drak2−/− mice showed impaired antibody responses to TD antigen
GCs are critical for the production and the affinity maturation of antibodies [35, 36]. We hypothesized that the impaired GC formation in drak2−/− mice would result in impaired production of high affinity antibodies in these mice. To test this hypothesis, we collected sera from NP16-CGG immunized drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice at day 28, after a booster injection at day 21, and measured the ability of IgM and IgG1 antibodies to bind NP3 as well as, the serum concentration of total IgM and IgG1. In drak2−/− mice, the total serum level of IgM was comparable to their wild-type littermates; however, in these mice, the total IgG1 serum level was significantly reduced (Figure 3). Moreover, drak2−/− mice showed significantly lower binding affinity of IgG1 to NP3. Thus, DRAK2 activity is essential for sustaining the GC reaction necessary for the generation of high affinity antibodies.
Figure 3.
Impaired antibody response to TD antigen in drak2−/− mice. Mice were immunized with NP16-CGG at day 0 and then given a booster injection on day 21. Sera were collected at day 28 and analyzed for total and NP-specific IgM and IgG1. NP3-BSA was used to capture high affinity IgM and IgG1. Total IgG1 and high-affinity NP3-specific IgG1 levels in drak2−/− mice were significant lower as compared to their wild-type littermates (* p < 0.005). The reduction in total and NP3-specific IgG1 levels reflected decreased class switching to IgG1as well as impaired positive selection of high affinity mutants.
drak2−/− B cells display normal SHM and CSR
Immunoglobulin (Ig) SHM and CSR occur in GCs. Both mechanisms play critical roles in the development of efficient and mature antibody responses [37, 38]. SHM introduces point-mutations at a very high rate (10−3 base pair/cell division) in Ig V(D)J DNA [29, 39–41], thereby providing the substrate for selection of high affinity mutants by the antigen driving of the antibody response (affinity maturation). CSR diversifies the effector functions of the antibody by replacing Cμ exons with Cγ, Cα or Cε exons, thereby converting IgM to IgA, IgG or IgE [29, 42–44].
We wanted to determine whether the defective production of high affinity antibodies in drak2−/− mice, was a result of impaired SHM. To this end, we analyzed the JH4-iEμ intronic region DNA and evaluated the frequency of mutations [29, 39, 40, 45, 46]. Point-mutations in this region reflect the intrinsic activity of SHM, and a decreased mutation frequency in this region stems from a defective SHM machinery [29]. The analysis of iEμ DNA showed that the frequency of mutations in drak2−/− mice was comparable to that of Drak2+/+ mice, suggesting that SHM in DRAK2-deficient B cells was functionally normal (Figure 4A). To determine whether the reduction in the overall IgG1 serum levels in drak2−/− mice resulted from a defective CSR machinery, we performed in vitro CSR assays on splenocytes harvested from non-immunized drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ activated in vitro with LPS and IL-4. We found that drak2−/− B cells displayed a CSR activity comparable to that of their wild-type counterparts (Figure 4B). Thus, DRAK2-deficient B cells display functional SHM and CSR, indicating that the defective high affinity IgG1 antibody production in drak2−/− mice does not result from defects in these machineries.
Figure 4.
Normal SHM and CSR in drak2−/− mice and drak2−/− B cells. (A) The mouse JH4-iEμ intronic region DNA was amplified from Peyer’s patch B cells and subjected to sequence analysis. Pie charts depict the proportions of sequences that carry 1, 2, 3, etc. mutations over the 560 bp DNA sequence analyzed. The numbers of the sequences analyzed are at the center of the pies. The mutation frequency in drak2−/− was comparable to that in Drak2+/+ mice (p = 0.30). (B) In vitro CSR in B cells from spleens of 8–12 weeks drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ littermates were cultured in medium containing LPS and IL-4 or LPS alone to induce CSR to IgG1 or IgG3, respectively. After 5 days, B cells were harvested, stained with PE-anti-B220 mAb and FITC-anti-IgG1 mAb or FITC-anti-IgG3 mAb and analyzed by FACS. The proportion of drak2−/− B cells switching to IgG1 and IgG3 were comparable to those of Drak2+/+ B cells.
GC B cells in drak2−/− mice display increased apoptosis
Apoptosis plays critical roles in GC development and homeostasis [33, 38, 47, 48]. Since drak2−/− B cell proliferation was found to be normal, we hypothesized that GC B cell survival is impaired in these mice. To test this hypothesis, we harvested B cells from NP16-CGG immunized drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice and stained them with Annexin-V for FACS analysis. drak2−/− mice showed increased total B cell apoptosis (Figure 5A). We also analyzed GC B cell apoptosis by staining with PE-anti-mouse B220 mAb, FITC-PNA and 7-AAD spleen B cells from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 10 and 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization. B220+PNAhi (GC) B cells from drak2−/− mice showed a higher degree of apoptosis than their wild-type counterparts (Figure 5B). To directly visualize apoptotic B cells in the GC, we stained with PE-anti-mouse B220 mAb, FITC-PNA and Texas red-TUNEL spleen sections from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 7 days after immunization with NP16-CGG. TUNEL signals (red dots, indicators of apoptosis) showed that drak2−/− mice displayed a three-fold increase in the GC B cell apoptosis as compared to their wild-type littermates (Figure 5C, D). Such an increased apoptosis was almost entirely due to apoptosis of light zone GC B cells, as suggested by their proximity to the T cell zone [49].
Figure 5.
Increased apoptosis in drak2−/− GC B cells. (A) Spleen B cells were harvested from 8–12 weeks drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ littermates 14 days after immunization with NP16-CGG and stained with FITC-Annexin V and PE-anti-B220 mAb to measure apoptotic cells. drak2−/− mice displayed an about two-fold higher degree of B cell apoptosis than their wild-type littermates. (B) Spleen B cells were harvested from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 10 and 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization and stained with FITC-PNA, PE-anti-B220 mAb and 7-AAD. FACS analysis showed a significantly higher proportion of apoptotic B220+PNAhi B cells from drak2−/− mice than Drak2+/+mice. (C) Spleen sections harvested from drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice 7 days after NP16-CGG immunization were stained with FITC-PNA, PE-anti-B220 mAb and TUNEL (Texas red, apoptotic cell marker), and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Red dots reflected TUNEL staining of fragmented DNA, which is characteristic of apoptosis. Counting of TUNEL red dots showed increased B cell apoptosis in drak2−/− mice GCs. Apoptotic B cells lie in an area that likely identified the light zone (original magnification: 200×). (D) Significantly different numbers of TUNEL-positive signals (red dots) in drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice GCs.
Increased GC T cell apoptosis in drak2−/− mice
Th cells contribute to B cell survival in the GC by engaging CD40 on B cells with CD154 [17, 19, 50]. Two-photon microscopy has shown that B cells establish stable contacts with T cells in the GC during the immune response [49, 51]. Also, B and T cells have frequent encounters and T cells carry fragments of dead B cells, suggesting that T cells play a more dominant role in GC B cell selection than previously thought, and indicating that T cells are critical for B cell survival in the GC [51]. DRAK2 is highly expressed in T cells and, as we have shown above, B cells undergo increased apoptosis in drak2−/− mice. Moreover, drak2−/− T cells exhibit enhanced apoptosis in autoimmune EAE mice [12]. We hypothesized that GC T cells will also display a high rate of apoptosis. Consistent with this hypothesis, activated T cells from drak2−/− T cells have been found to be hypersensitive to apoptosis (Ramos et al, manuscript submitted). To test our hypothesis, we harvested T cells from NP16-CGG immunized drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice and stained them with PE-anti-CD3 mAb, FITC-PNA and APC-7-AAD. FACS analysis of these stained cells showed increased T cell apoptosis in GCs of drak2−/− mice (Figure 6A).
Figure 6.
Rescue of GC formation and GC B cells by the enforced expression of Bcl-XL in T cells in drak2−/− mice. (A) T cells from spleens of 8–12 weeks drak2−/− and Drak2+/+ mice were harvested 14 days after immunization with NP16-CGG and stained with FITC-PNA, PE-anti-CD3 mAb and 7-AAD. FACS analysis showed a higher proportion of CD3+PNAhi cells undergoing apoptosis in drak2−/− mice than in Drak2+/+ mice. (B) Spleen sections from drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice 14 days after NP16-CGG immunization were stained with FITC-PNA and PE-anti-B220 mAb, and subjected to Immunofluorescence microscopy. The number of GCs per field was and found to be comparable in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice (original magnification: 63×). (C) The number of B220+PNAhi GC B cells in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice was also comparable, indicating a normal GC formation in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice.
T cell survival induced by enforced Bcl-XL expression rescues B cells from apoptosis, restores GC formation and corrects the TD antibody response to NP16-CGG in drak2−/− mice
To determine whether B cell apoptosis in drak2−/− mice is secondary to increased T cell apoptosis, we immunized mice bearing a Bcl-xL transgene that was specifically expressed in T cells [28] crossed onto the drak2−/− background (drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice) (Ramos et al, manuscript submitted). drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice and their Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL counterparts were immunized with NP16-CGG and spleens were harvested 14 days after immunization for histological and FACS analysis. drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice exhibited numbers of GCs and GC B cells comparable to those in Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice (Figure 6B, C), suggesting a rescue of drak2−/− GC B cells upon enforced expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL in T cells [25]. Accordingly, TUNEL analysis showed that cell apoptosis in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL GCs was not higher than that in Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice (Figure 7A, B). We then measured B cell apoptosis using Annexin-V and also found that B cells in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice exhibited apoptosis to a degree not higher than that of B cells in Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice (Figure 7C). To determine whether the T cell-dependent rescue of B cell apoptosis also rescued the antibody response to TD NP16-CGG, we analyzed total and NP3-binding IgM and IgG1 in mice that had been injected with NP16-CGG 28 days before, and boosted 21 days after the initial injection. The total IgG1 serum level in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice was restored to near normal level, virtually comparable to that in Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL littermates. Accordingly, enforced expression of Bcl-xL in drak2−/− GC T cells completely restored or significantly raised the level of high affinity NP3-binding IgG1 (Figures 3 and 8). Thus, increased intrinsic T cell apoptosis was responsible for the lower number of GCs and GC B cells, and the defective TD antibody response in drak2−/− mice (p > 0.05).
Figure 7.
Rescue of GC B cell apoptosis by enforced expression of Bcl-XL in T cells of drak2−/− mice. (A) Spleen sections from drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice were stained with FITC-PNA, PE-anti-B220 mAb and TUNEL and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The number of red dots, which reflects TUNEL staining of fragmented DNA in apoptotic cells, was not significantly different in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice GCs. (B) Quantitative comparison of TUNEL+ cells showing no significant difference in apoptotic cell numbers in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice GCs (original magnification: 200×). (C) Spleen B cells from 8–12 weeks drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL littermates were harvested 14 day after immunization with NP16-CGG and stained with FITC-Annexin V and PE-anti-B220 mAb and analyzed by FACS. No significant difference in the number of apoptotic B cells was detected in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice.
Figure 8.
Rescue of the antibody response to TD antigen by enforced Bcl-xL expression in T cells in drak2−/− mice. drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL and Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice were immunized with NP16-CGG at day 0 and then given booster injection on day 21. Sera from mice were collected at day 28 after the first immunization and analyzed. NP3-BSA was used to capture high affinity NP-specific IgM and IgG1. Total IgG1 and high-affinity NP3-specific IgG1 levels in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice were comparable to their Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL littermates. There were no significant reduction in total and NP3-specific IgG1 antibodies levels (* p > 0.05), likely reflecting a significant rescue of B cell apoptosis following enforced survival of drak2−/− T cells by Bcl-xL.
Discussion
Proteins in the DAP family regulate apoptosis in many cell types. DRAK2, one of the DAP family members, is highly expressed in both B and T lymphocytes [11]. Its role in T cells has been studied extensively. However, the function of DRAK2 in B cells and its role in the humoral immune response have not been investigated. Also, the mechanisms that regulate DRAK2 functions and its substrates are still to be identified. We have shown that DRAK2 is specifically expressed in the GC. We have also shown here that drak2−/− mice exhibit impaired GC development. We initially speculated that this defect might be a result of impaired B cell proliferation, since B cell proliferation is critical during the early stages of GC formation. However, we found no intrinsic defect in drak2−/− B cell proliferation in vivo or in vitro, leading us to hypothesize that the impairment in GC formation in drak2−/− mice may be a result of defect(s) in later stages of the GC reaction.
The unique dynamics and structure of the GC are critical for the maturation of the antibody response. Thus, impairment in GC development might result in an impaired antibody response in drak2−/− mice. Indeed, we found that, when compared to their wild-type littermates, drak2−/− mice displayed a more than 35% reduction in total IgG1 serum levels and about 75% reduction in high affinity antibodies against NP3. This defect in generating high affinity IgGs was not due to inherent defects in the SHM and CSR machineries, as we found both SHM and CSR to be inherently functional in drak2−/− B cells and drak2−/− mice. This led us to conclude that in these mice, the decrease in total IgG1 serum level and high affinity NP3-binding IgG1 was the result of increased apoptosis of B cells, and thereby, a defective positive selection, in the GC.
Apoptosis is important for the development, maintenance and effector functions of the immune system [33]. It is crucial in the GC reaction and disruption of the mechanisms that regulate B cell apoptosis results in GC hyperplasia and impaired antibody responses [48]. We have shown that the proportion of spleen B cells undergoing apoptosis was higher in drak2−/− mice when compared to their wild-type littermates. However, increased total B cell apoptosis in the spleen does not necessary implies an increased GC B cell apoptosis. Therefore, we have further quantified apoptotic B cells in the GC and shown that the number of GC B cells undergoing apoptosis in drak2−/− mice was significantly higher than their wild-type counterparts during days 10 through 14 post-NP16-CGG immunization. These findings were informative, but limited, in that they did not specifically show where in the GC B cells were undergoing apoptosis. Our TUNEL staining results suggested that apoptotic B cell were localized in an area that likely identifies the GC light zone, where B cells displaying a mutated, high affinity BCR are positively selected [49].
The GC is an elaborate microenvironment of cellular interaction and the complex nature of such interactions is critical to their development and function. B cells make up 95% and T cells make up 2–3% of the total GC cell population. DRAK2 expression in both cell types makes the role of this signaling molecule important during a humoral response and T and B cell interactions in the GC reaction. GC Th cells are important in stimulating B cells to undergo SHM and CSR and differentiate into memory and plasma cells, and are likely involved in B cell positive selection [17, 52]. A pathway for B cell selection in the GC would entail T cell interactions with B cells (centrocytes) via gp39 and CD40 [18, 53]. Failure of B cells to receive Th cell signals has been thought to result in their apoptosis. However, to date, there has been no conclusive evidence showing Th cell involvement in the positive selection during the GC reaction. Imaging studies using the two-photon microscopy have suggested that T cells play a major role in B cell positive selection during an immune response, a conclusion reached by observing T cells forming stable contacts with B cells [49, 51]. Our findings have provided the first indication that increased T cell apoptosis leads to an abnormal B cell apoptosis in the GC, which, in turn, would lead to a defective positive selection in a TD antibody response.
As we have shown here, deficiency in DRAK2 results in increased B cell apoptosis in the GC and decreased numbers of GCs. We contended that apoptosis would also occur in GC T cells. Indeed, we have found that the proportion of T cell undergoing apoptosis in the GC of DRAK2-deficient mice is significantly higher than that of their wild-type controls. Further, we asked the question whether the increased B cell apoptosis in the GC of drak2−/− mice is inherent to B cells or is due to lack of T cell stimulation. We have shown here that specific overexpression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xLin drak2−/− T cells prevented T cell apoptosis [28] in GCs and restored the numbers of GCs and GC B cells in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice. Indeed, the proportion of B cell undergoing apoptosis in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice was comparable to Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice. TUNEL staining has also showed that GC B cell apoptosis in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice was normal, that is, comparable to Drak2+/+ tg Bcl-xL mice. These findings led us to conclude that, in drak2−/− mice, rescue of T cells from apoptosis leads to rescue of GC development and prevents B cells from undergoing apoptosis.
In drak2−/− mice, T cells failed to support B cell survival and selection in the GC, leading to an abortive GC reaction and an impaired antibody response to NP16-CGG. The GC rescue in drak2−/− tg Bcl-xL mice was effective, in that it leads to the restoration of serum IgG1 level as well as the high affinity IgG1 response to NP3. Thus, rescue of T cells from apoptosis allowed for a restoration of positive selection of affinity matured IgG1 antibodies. In conclusion, our findings show that drak2−/− B cells are inherently normal in SHM and CSR. They also demonstrate that by allowing for T cell survival, DRAK2 is critical for fostering and supporting an optimal GC reaction and the maturation of a high affinity class switched antibody response. Finally, they suggest that T cells play an important role in GC lymphocyte selection, possibly by providing, in combination with FDCs, secondary signals that are critical in preventing B cells with high affinity BCRs from undergoing apoptosis [49, 51, 54–57].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by N.I.H. grants AI 45011 and AI 60573 to P.C., and AI 63419 to C.M.W.
We thank Dr. Zsuzsanna Pal, Stephanie Ramos and Jennifer Hernandez for their invaluable discussions.
References
- 1.Sanjo H, Kawai T, Akira S. DRAKs, novel serine/threonine kinases related to death-associated protein kinase that trigger apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:29066–29071. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.44.29066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kawai T, Nomura F, Hoshino K, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Akira S. Death-associated protein kinase 2 is a new calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase that signals apoptosis through its catalytic activity. Oncogene. 1999;18:3471–3480. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kogel D, Prehn JH, Scheidtmann KH. The DAP kinase family of pro-apoptotic proteins: novel players in the apoptotic game. Bioessays. 2001;23:352–358. doi: 10.1002/bies.1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kissil JL, Feinstein E, Cohen O, Jones PA, Tsai YC, Knowles MA, Eydmann ME, Kimchi A. DAP-kinase loss of expression in various carcinoma and B-cell lymphoma cell lines: possible implications for role as tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 1997;15:403–407. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Friedrich ML, Wen BG, Bain G, Kee BL, Katayama C, Murre C, Hedrick SM, Walsh CM. DRAK2, a lymphoid-enriched DAP kinase, regulates the TCR activation threshold during thymocyte selection. Int Immunol. 2005;17:1379–1390. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matsumoto M, Miyake Y, Nagita M, Inoue H, Shitakubo D, Takemoto K, Ohtsuka C, Murakami H, Nakamura N, Kanazawa H. A serine/threonine kinase which causes apoptosis-like cell death interacts with a calcineurin B-like protein capable of binding Na(+)/H(+) exchanger. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2001;130:217–225. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuwahara H, Nakamura N, Kanazawa H. Nuclear Localization of the Serine/Threonine Kinase DRAK2 Is Involved in UV-Induced Apoptosis. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29:225–233. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Friedrich ML, Cui M, Hernandez JB, Weist BM, Andersen HM, Zhang X, Huang L, Walsh CM. Modulation of DRAK2 autophosphorylation by antigen receptor signaling in primary lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:4573–4584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606675200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raveh T, Droguett G, Horwitz MS, DePinho RA, Kimchi A. DAP kinase activates a p19ARF/p53-mediated apoptotic checkpoint to suppress oncogenic transformation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1–7. doi: 10.1038/35050500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mao J, Qiao X, Luo H, Wu J. Transgenic drak2 overexpression in mice leads to increased T cell apoptosis and compromised memory T cell development. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:12587–12595. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600497200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McGargill MA, Wen BG, Walsh CM, Hedrick SM. A deficiency in Drak2 results in a T cell hypersensitivity and an unexpected resistance to autoimmunity. Immunity. 2004;21:781–791. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramos SJ, Hardison JL, Stiles LN, Lane TE, Walsh CM. Anti-viral effector T cell responses and trafficking are not dependent upon DRAK2 signaling following viral infection of the central nervous system. Autoimmunity. 2007;40:54–65. doi: 10.1080/08916930600996700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schaumburg CS, Gatzka M, Walsh CM, Lane TE. DRAK2 regulates memory T cell responses following murine coronavirus infection. Autoimmunity. 2007;40:483–488. doi: 10.1080/08916930701651139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meyer-Hermann M, Beyer T. The type of seeder cells determines the efficiency of germinal center reactions. Bull Math Biol. 2004;66:125–141. doi: 10.1016/j.bulm.2003.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Marinova E, Han S, Zheng B. Human germinal center T cells are unique Th cells with high propensity for apoptosis induction. Int Immunol. 2006;18:1337–1345. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu YJ, Johnson GD, Gordon J, MacLennan IC. Germinal centres in T-cell-dependent antibody responses. Immunol Today. 1992;13:17–21. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90199-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McHeyzer-Williams LJ, Malherbe LP, McHeyzer-Williams MG. Helper T cell-regulated B cell immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;311:59–83. doi: 10.1007/3-540-32636-7_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.MacLennan IC. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:117–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manser T. Textbook germinal centers? J Immunol. 2004;172:3369–3375. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hur DY, Kim DJ, Kim S, Kim YI, Cho D, Lee DS, Hwang Y, Bae K, Chang KY, Lee WJ. Role of follicular dendritic cells in the apoptosis of germinal center B cells. Immunol Lett. 2000;72:107–111. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(00)00166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hoch S, Boyd M, Malone B, Gonye G, Schwaber J, Schwaber J. Fas-mediated apoptosis eliminates B cells that acquire self-reactivity during the germinal center response to NP. Cell Immunol. 2000;203:103–110. doi: 10.1006/cimm.2000.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsunoda R, Heinen E, Sugai N. Follicular dendritic cells in vitro modulate the expression of Fas and Bcl-2 on germinal center B cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2000;299:395–402. doi: 10.1007/s004419900172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelsoe G. The germinal center: a crucible for lymphocyte selection. Semin Immunol. 1996;8:179–184. doi: 10.1006/smim.1996.0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kelsoe G. Life and death in germinal centers (redux) Immunity. 1996;4:107–111. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80675-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tarlinton DM, Smith KG. Dissecting affinity maturation: a model explaining selection of antibody-forming cells and memory B cells in the germinal centre. Immunol Today. 2000;21:436–441. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(00)01687-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Phan TG, Paus D, Chan TD, Turner ML, Nutt SL, Basten A, Brink R. High affinity germinal center B cells are actively selected into the plasma cell compartment. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2419–2424. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meyer-Hermann ME, Maini PK. Cutting edge: back to “one-way” germinal centers. J Immunol. 2005;174:2489–2493. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chao DT, Linette GP, Boise LH, White LS, Thompson CB, Korsmeyer SJ. Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 repress a common pathway of cell death. J Exp Med. 1995;182:821–828. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.3.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zan H, Shima N, Xu Z, Al-Qahtani A, Evinger AJ, Iii, Zhong Y, Schimenti JC, Casali P. The translesion DNA polymerase theta plays a dominant role in immunoglobulin gene somatic hypermutation. Embo J. 2005;24:3757–3769. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rose ML, Birbeck MS, Wallis VJ, Forrester JA, Davies AJ. Peanut lectin binding properties of germinal centres of mouse lymphoid tissue. Nature. 1980;284:364–366. doi: 10.1038/284364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kraal G, Weissman IL, Butcher EC. Germinal centre B cells: antigen specificity and changes in heavy chain class expression. Nature. 1982;298:377–379. doi: 10.1038/298377a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, Carter RH. CD19 regulates B cell maturation, proliferation, and positive selection in the FDC zone of murine splenic germinal centers. Immunity. 2005;22:749–761. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Opferman JT, Korsmeyer SJ. Apoptosis in the development and maintenance of the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:410–415. doi: 10.1038/ni0503-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ettinger R, Sims GP, Fairhurst AM, Robbins R, da Silva YS, Spolski R, Leonard WJ, Lipsky PE. IL-21 induces differentiation of human naive and memory B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:7867–7879. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moreira JS, Faro J. Modelling two possible mechanisms for the regulation of the germinal center dynamics. J Immunol. 2006;177:3705–3710. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meyer-Hermann M. A mathematical model for the germinal center morphology and affinity maturation. J Theor Biol. 2002;216:273–300. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rundell A, DeCarlo R, HogenEsch H, Doerschuk P. The humoral immune response to Haemophilus influenzae type b: a mathematical model based on T-zone and germinal center B-cell dynamics. J Theor Biol. 1998;194:341–381. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wolniak KL, Shinall SM, Waldschmidt TJ. The germinal center response. Crit Rev Immunol. 2004;24:39–65. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v24.i1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Casali P, Pal Z, Xu Z, Zan H. DNA repair in antibody somatic hypermutation. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xu Z, Zan H, Pal Z, Casali P. DNA replication to aid somatic hypermutation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;596:111–127. doi: 10.1007/0-387-46530-8_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Neuberger MS, Di Noia JM, Beale RC, Williams GT, Yang Z, Rada C. Somatic hypermutation at A. T pairs: polymerase error versus dUTP incorporation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:171–178. doi: 10.1038/nri1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Casali P, Zan H. Class switching and Myc translocation: how does DNA break? Nat Immunol. 2004;5:1101–1103. doi: 10.1038/ni1104-1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu Z, Fulop Z, Zhong Y, Evinger AJ, 3rd, Zan H, Casali P. DNA lesions and repair in immunoglobulin class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1050:146–162. doi: 10.1196/annals.1313.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zan H, Wu X, Komori A, Holloman WK, Casali P. AID-dependent generation of resected double-strand DNA breaks and recruitment of Rad52/Rad51 in somatic hypermutation. Immunity. 2003;18:727–738. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00151-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Diaz M, Verkoczy LK, Flajnik MF, Klinman NR. Decreased frequency of somatic hypermutation and impaired affinity maturation but intact germinal center formation in mice expressing antisense RNA to DNA polymerase zeta. J Immunol. 2001;167:327–335. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kimoto H, Nagaoka H, Adachi Y, Mizuochi T, Azuma T, Yagi T, Sata T, Yonehara S, Tsunetsugu-Yokota Y, Taniguchi M, Takemori T. Accumulation of somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection in rapidly cycling surface Ig+ germinal center (GC) B cells which occupy GC at a high frequency during the primary anti-hapten response in mice. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:268–279. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu YJ, Arpin C. Germinal center development. Immunol Rev. 1997;156:111–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van Eijk M, Defrance T, Hennino A, de Groot C. Death-receptor contribution to the germinal-center reaction. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:677–682. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02086-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Allen CD, Ansel KM, Low C, Lesley R, Tamamura H, Fujii N, Cyster JG. Germinal center dark and light zone organization is mediated by CXCR4 and CXCR5. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:943–952. doi: 10.1038/ni1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hennino A, Berard M, Krammer PH, Defrance T. FLICE-inhibitory protein is a key regulator of germinal center B cell apoptosis. J Exp Med. 2001;193:447–458. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.4.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Allen CD, Okada T, Tang HL, Cyster JG. Imaging of germinal center selection events during affinity maturation. Science. 2007;315:528–531. doi: 10.1126/science.1136736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zan H, Li Z, Yamaji K, Dramitinos P, Cerutti A, Casali P. B cell receptor engagement and T cell contact induce Bcl-6 somatic hypermutation in human B cells: identity with Ig hypermutation. J Immunol. 2000;165:830–839. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cerutti A, Zan H, Schaffer A, Bergsagel L, Harindranath N, Max EE, Casali P. CD40 ligand and appropriate cytokines induce switching to IgG, IgA, and IgE and coordinated germinal center and plasmacytoid phenotypic differentiation in a human monoclonal IgM+IgD+ B cell line. J Immunol. 1998;160:2145–2157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Estes JD, Thacker TC, Hampton DL, Kell SA, Keele BF, Palenske EA, Druey KM, Burton GF. Follicular dendritic cell regulation of CXCR4-mediated germinal center CD4 T cell migration. J Immunol. 2004;173:6169–6178. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.6169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Park CS, Yoon SO, Armitage RJ, Choi YS. Follicular dendritic cells produce IL-15 that enhances germinal center B cell proliferation in membrane-bound form. J Immunol. 2004;173:6676–6683. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schmidt-Supprian M, Tian J, Ji H, Terhorst C, Bhan AK, Grant EP, Pasparakis M, Casola S, Coyle AJ, Rajewsky K. I kappa B kinase 2 deficiency in T cells leads to defects in priming, B cell help, germinal center reactions, and homeostatic expansion. J Immunol. 2004;173:1612–1619. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Allen CD, Okada T, Cyster JG. Germinal-center organization and cellular dynamics. Immunity. 2007;27:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








