Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):50–51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.50-b

Review of Hear the Silence

Confusion has resulted from conflating two questions into one

Ed Cooper 1
PMCID: PMC314251  PMID: 14703565

Editor—Much of the confusion about measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism is caused by the conflation of two questions into one. This is exemplified in the responses from parents with affected children to the reviews of Hear the Silence1-4 and a little in the response from the editor of the Lancet.5

As things stand, anyone who has doubts on giving their child measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine should have the same doubts on giving their child measles vaccine alone, as a single vaccine. Parents who fear MMR are generally willing to give single measles vaccine because they know that any risk of that vaccine is outweighed by the risk of measles, a condition that makes children much sicker than modern parents find tolerable even when it is uncomplicated, and that kills or maims them when it is complicated.

Presumably the risk parents tolerate on behalf of their child includes the tenuous, speculative risk of autism after the single vaccine. If they are willing to give single measles vaccine then they can only be unwilling to give MMR if they believe that there is some evidence suggesting a difference in late side effects between measles vaccine in MMR and measles vaccine alone, and there is absolutely no such evidence.

This is why almost no public health and child health doctors view the single vaccines alternative as the middle ground, the compromise area. A programme attempting six separate single virus injections per child (on top of all the other immunisations) could only harm attempts at population herd immunity, as well as causing pain and increasing fear in individual children.

Competing interests: None declared.

References


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES