Abstract
The beneficial effects of DNA cytidine deamination by activation-induced deaminase (AID; antibody gene diversification) and APOBEC3G (retrovirus restriction) are tempered by probable contributions to carcinogenesis. Multiple regulatory mechanisms serve to minimize this detrimental outcome. Here, we show that phosphorylation of a conserved threonine attenuates the intrinsic activity of activation-induced deaminase (Thr-27) and APOBEC3G (Thr-218). Phospho-null alanine mutants maintain intrinsic DNA deaminase activity, whereas phospho-mimetic glutamate mutants are inactive. The phospho-mimetic variants fail to mediate isotype switching in activated mouse splenic B lymphocytes or suppress HIV-1 replication in human T cells. Our data combine to suggest a model in which this critical threonine acts as a phospho-switch that fine-tunes the adaptive and innate immune responses and helps protect mammalian genomic DNA from procarcinogenic lesions.
Keywords: Antibodies, DNA Enzymes, DNA Repair, HIV, Innate Immunity, AID, APOBEC3G, DNA Cytosine Deaminase, DNA Editing
Introduction
Activation-induced deaminase (AID)2 and APOBEC3G (A3G) are the archetypal members of a larger family of polynucleotide cytidine-to-uridine deaminases with critical functions in adaptive and innate immunity(1, 2). All mammals have AID, apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic subunit 1 (APOBEC1), APOBEC2 and variable numbers of APOBEC3s (A3) ranging from one in rodents to seven in most primates, including humans (A3A/B/C/D/F/G/H)(3). AID, A1, A3A, A3C, and A3H are single domain proteins with one zinc-coordinating active site, whereas several A3s, including rodent A3 and human A3B, A3D, A3F, and A3G, are double domain proteins with two zinc-coordinating motifs (both are conserved, but typically only one is active). Atomic structures for the catalytic domain of human A3G(4–7) and APOBEC2(8) are available, and these enable structure-function studies and homology models.
Considerable effort has been devoted to understanding the multiple mechanisms that combine to regulate AID and A3G activity. First, the transcription of each of these genes is tissue-specific, with AID being expressed predominantly in B lymphocytes and A3G in most cell types (9–11). Second, AID and A3G transcription levels are up-regulated by distinct signal transduction pathways (STAT/NFκB for AID and NFAT/IRF for A3G) (12, 13). Third, AID expression is regulated by at least one microRNA, miR-155 (14, 15). Fourth, both proteins are predominantly cytoplasmic, with AID having additional nuclear import and export capabilities (16–20). Finally, both proteins are subject to proteasome-dependent degradation, AID in the nuclear compartment (21) and A3G in the cytoplasmic compartment (22–24).
In addition, numerous proteins have been implicated in regulating AID and A3G function (MDM2 (25), replication protein A (26), heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) (27), germinal center-associated nuclear protein (GANP) (28), calcium and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) (29), beta-catenin-like protein 1 (CTNNBL1) (30)), with protein kinase A (PKA) (31–34) being most relevant to this work. PKA phosphorylates AID at threonine 27 and serine 38, with serine 38 phosphorylation promoting interactions with replication protein A and facilitating class-switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation (31–33, 35). Phosphorylation of the homologous residue in A3G, threonine 32, also has functional consequences by rendering the protein less susceptible to HIV-1 Vif-induced ubiquitylation and degradation(34). Here, we provide evidence in support of a new role for threonine/serine phosphorylation in directly suppressing the intrinsic DNA deaminase activity of AID and A3G. Extensive conservation of this particular residue suggests that phospho-regulation may extend to most other DNA deaminase superfamily members.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
DNA Constructs
pEGFP-N3-A3G and pEGFP-N3-AID have been described (36, 37). Mutants of AID and A3G were made by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). The retroviral vector pMX-EGFP was constructed by subcloning EGFP from plasmid pEGFP-N3 (Clontech) into pMX-PIE (a gift from V. Barreto) using EcoRI/NotI. pMX-AID-IRES-EGFP was generated by first amplifying untagged AID from pEGFP-N3-AID by PCR using primers 5′-GCT AGC GCC ACC ATG GAC AGC CT and 5′-CCT GCA GGT CAA AGT CCC AAA GTA. The insert was cut with NheI/SbfI and ligated into pCSII-IRES-EGFP (a gift from N. Somia). The AID-IRES-EGFP insert was then PCR-amplified using primers 5′-GAA TTC ATG GAC AGC CTC TTG ATG AAC and 5′-CCA CAT AGC GTA AAA GGA GCA AC, cut using EcoRI/NotI, and ligated into pMX-PIE. The MLV amphotrophic envelope vector pRK5-10A1 and the HIV-1 accessory vector ΔNRF were generous gifts from N. Somia. The MLV accessory vector pMD-OGP was provided by F. Randow. The Vif-deficient HIV-1IIIB provirus has been used previously (38, 39). The Escherichia coli expression constructs pTrc99a-AID-GST and pTrc99a-A3G-GST were generated by subcloning AID from pEGFP-N3-AID or A3G from pEGFP-N3-A3G into pTrc99a-GST using NcoI/SalI. The untagged bacterial expression plasmids pTrc99a-hAID and pTrc99a-A3G have been described (37).
In Vitro Peptide Kinase Assays
CaMKII (New England Biolabs) or PKA (New England Biolabs or gift from L. Masterson and G. Veglia, Ref. 40) were incubated with 1 μg of either kemptide (CLRRASLG, American Peptide Co.), a peptide containing A3G-T218 (VRGRHETYLCYE, New England Peptides), or an A3G-T218A mutant peptide (VRGRHEAYLCYE, New England Peptides) in the manufacturer's recommended buffer supplemented with [γ-32P]-ATP. Kinase reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 1 h before fractionating on a 16% Tricine/urea-acrylamide gel. The gel was dried and imaged by phosphorimaging (FLA-5000, Fuji).
E. coli Mutation Assays
The rifampicin resistance assay has been published (41, 42). BW310 E. coli cells were transformed with pTrc99a-AID or pTrc99a-A3G expression constructs and plated on ampicillin-containing media. Four individual colonies were picked and seeded into media containing 1 mm isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside and 100 μg/ml ampicillin. After shaking overnight at 37 °C, the cultures were plated on ampicillin media to obtain viable cell counts and to 100 μg/ml rifampicin-containing media for mutational frequency. AID and A3G expression levels were determined by Western blot analysis using antibodies against AID (EK25G9, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) or A3G (#10201 rabbit anti-A3G polyclonal serum provided by J. Lingappa through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program).
Recombinant Protein Preparations
Protein samples for AID/A3G were prepared by growing 500-ml cultures of BL21 E. coli cells transformed with pTrc99a-GST, pTrc99a-AID-GST, pTrc99a-A3G-GST, or mutants of AID/A3G. The cultures were centrifuged, and the cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.9), 200 mm NaCl, 50 μm ZnCl2, complete protease inhibitors (Roche)). After centrifugation (17,000 × g, 20 min), clarified lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with glutathione-Sepharose (GE Healthcare). The resin was washed four times with lysis buffer, and purified protein was eluted by cleavage with tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease (Invitrogen).
For preparation of A3G from human cells, pcDNA3.1-A3G-myc-his or mutants thereof were transfected into HEK293T cells cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen) and 10% FBS (Hyclone) using TransIT-LT1 reagent (Mirus). After 48 h, cells were lysed in buffer (25 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mm NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm MgCl2 1 mm ZnCl, 10% glycerol) and bound to nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose beads (Qiagen). The beads were washed, and purified protein was eluted using imidazole (250 μm), as described (43).
DNA Binding Assays
Protein samples prepared from E. coli as above were used for AID DNA binding reactions. 6 pmol of purified protein was diluted serially 1:2 and mixed with 0.5 pmol 32P-labeled oligo (5′-ATT ATT ATT ATT CCA ATG GAT TTA TTT ATT TWR CTA TTT ATT T) in binding buffer (10 mm HEPES (pH 7.6), 10% glycerol, 100 mm KCl, 10 mm MgCl2, 100 μm EDTA, 500 μm DTT). Reactions were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before separation on a 7% Tris borate-EDTA acrylamide gel. The gel was dried and imaged by phosphoimager (Storm, Molecular Dynamics).
Protein samples purified from human cells from the above were used for A3G DNA binding reactions. 25 pmol of purified protein was diluted serially 1:2, and each dilution was mixed with 1 pmol fluorescein-labeled oligo (5′-ATT ATT ATT ATT CCA ATG GAT TTA TTT ATT TAT TTA TTT ATT T-fluorescein) in binding buffer. The reactions were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before separation on a 7% Tris borate-EDTA acrylamide gel. The free and bound oligos were then detected by fluorescence imaging (FLA-5000, Fuji).
Oligo-based Deaminase Assays
Protein samples purified from human cells as above were used for A3G deaminase activity reactions. Starting with 1.2 pmol purified protein, 2-fold serial dilutions were made and mixed with 1 pmol of substrate oligo (5′-ATT ATT ATT ATT CCA ATG GAT TTA TTT ATT TAT TTA TTT ATT T-fluorescein), 0.1 μg/μl RNase A (Qiagen), and 0.001 units/μl uracil DNA glycosylase (NEB). The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, and then NaOH was added to 100 μm before incubating at 90 °C for another 30 min. The reactions were separated on a 16% Tris/urea-acrylamide gel and visualized by fluorescence imaging (FLA-5000, Fuji).
Fluorescence Microscopy Studies
For steady-state A3G and AID localization, pEGFP-N3-A3G, pEGFP-N3-AID, or mutants thereof were transfected into HeLa cells grown in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone). 48 h later, the cellular localization was determined by fluorescence microscopy (Deltavision). For AID import activity, leptomycin-B (20 ng/ml) was added 2 h prior to imaging as above.
HIV Restriction Assays
CEM-SS and CEM-GFP (courtesy of M. Malim) were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone). Stable cell lines expressing pEGFP-N3, pEGFP-N3-A3G, or mutants were generated in the permissive cell line CEM-SS by electroporating linearized DNA and selecting for stable integrants with 1 mg/ml G418 (Mediatech) as described (38). Clones were confirmed to have similar expression levels by Western blot analysis using an antibody against A3G (rabbit polyclonal raised against a C-terminal peptide). Virus was produced by transfecting HIV-1 provirus using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus) HEK293T cells maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone). 48 h after transfection, virus-containing supernatants were filtered with a 0.45-μm filter. Viruses were then titered using the CEM-GFP reporter cell line as described (38). Spreading infections were initiated by adding virus to CEM-SS stable cell lines at a multiplicity of infection of 0.05. Supernatants from infected cultures were collected at 2- to 4-day intervals and added to CEM-GFP. After 48-hours, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and analyzed for GFP expression by flow cytometry (Quanta SC MPL, Beckman Coulter). Procedures for the detection of A3G in producer cells and viral particles have been described (44).
Class-switch Recombination Assays
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the University of Minnesota Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. The C57BL/6 AID−/− mice have been described (45). Ex vivo CSR assays were conducted by purifying resting B-cells from spleen by magnetic sorting (130-090-862, Miltenyi Biotec). Isolated B-cells were then cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 ng/ml IL-4, and 50 μg/ml LPS. After 48 h, the media were replaced with transducing viral supernatant supplemented with 20 mm HEPES and 16 μg/ml polybrene and centrifuged (600 × g, 2 h, 30 °C). The cells were then resuspended into fresh media containing IL-4 and LPS and cultured for 4 days. Efficiency of switching to IgG1 was determined by staining with anti-IgG1-PE (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences).
RESULTS
AID-Thr-27, A3G-Thr-32, and A3G-Thr-218 Are Homologous and Located within a Region of High Sequence and Structural Conservation
Prior studies demonstrated phosphorylation of AID-Thr-27 in vivo and in vitro by mass spectrometry and radiolabeling(31, 33, 35) and A3G-Thr-32 by immunoblotting (34). We noted that these two threonines are homologous to A3G-Thr-218, whose high-resolution structures have shown to be located within a solvent-accessible loop (4–7) (Fig. 1A). This threonine anchors a conserved motif that matches a consensus PKA phosphorylation site (R-H/R-X-T) (46) (Fig. 1B). Notably, nearly all AID/A3 family members have homologous threonine or serine residues at this exact position (Fig. 1C). Rare exceptions are only apparent in specific mammalian lineages (carnivores and rodents) or in redundant or inactive domains (most alleles of human A3H are unstable) (47). In the catalytic domain of A3G, the first arginine in this motif (Arg-215) is located adjacent to the catalytic glutamate, and it has been implicated in binding substrate single-stranded DNA (5–7). Taken together, these observations, and particularly the high level of conservation and the structural positioning next to the active site, suggest that phosphorylation and dephosphorylation may serve as a posttranslational switch that helps control the DNA deaminase activity of these mutagenic enzymes.
FIGURE 1.
An active-site Thr/Ser is conserved in mammalian DNA cytidine deaminases. A, Thr-218 is positioned adjacent to the catalytic glutamate Glu-259 in the crystal structure of A3G (3IR2) (4). The residues comprising the kinase recognition sequence and the side chains of the two cysteines that coordinate zinc are also shown. B, an alignment of the PKA consensus sequence, R-X-X-T, found in human AID, mouse AID, human A3G C-terminal domain (CTD), and human A3G N-terminal domain (NTD). C, a phylogenetic analysis showing the conservation of active site Thr/Ser residues in the AID/A3 proteins of nearly all mammals. Domains highlighted in orange represent the presence of a threonine, and domains highlighted in cyan contain a serine. Hs, human; Mm, mouse; Rn, rat; Bt, cow, Oa, sheep; Ss, pig; Tt, peccary; Ec, horse; Cf, dog; Fc, cat. D, PKA and CaMKII can phosphorylate A3G-Thr-218 in vitro.
PKA and CaMKII Phosphorylate A3G-Thr-218 in Vitro
AID-Thr-27 and A3G-Thr-32 can be phosphorylated by PKA (31, 33–35). To determine whether these observations extend to A3G-Thr-218, we asked whether recombinant PKA could phosphorylate a peptide representing the soluble loop in which this residue resides, VRGRHET218YLCYE. We found that PKA could readily phosphorylate this peptide but not a T218A mutant derivative that is otherwise identical (Fig. 1D). Similarly, CaMKII, which also phosphorylates R-X-X-T motifs (46), was able to phosphorylate the A3G-Thr-218 peptide but not the alanine mutant derivative. Both enzymes were also able to phosphorylate a serine in a control peptide (Kemptide). These data demonstrate that A3G-Thr-218 is a suitable substrate for at least two kinases, PKA and CaMKII.
Phospho-mimetic Mutations Inhibit DNA Cytidine Deaminase Activity
To address whether phosphorylation is capable of attenuating the DNA cytidine deaminase activity of AID and A3G, phospho-null and phospho-mimetic derivatives of these proteins were tested in an E. coli-based activity assay. The rifampicin-resistance (RifR) mutation assay has been used extensively to assess intrinsic DNA cytidine deaminase activity (41, 42). Consistent with prior reports, AID and A3G triggered 3- and 4-fold increases in the median RifR mutation frequency compared with catalytically inactive controls, AID-E58Q and A3G-E259Q (Fig. 2, A and B). In comparison, phospho-mimetic AID-T27E and A3G-T218E proteins also showed greatly reduced activity approaching background levels. Phospho-null alanine mutants showed slightly higher levels of mutator activity. Mutation of another predicted surface threonine in AID (Thr-140) or the homologous threonine in the non-catalytic N-terminal domain of A3G (Thr-32) had little effect. All proteins expressed similarly in E. coli, indicating that these data are not due to variable protein expression levels (lower panels in Fig. 2, A and B).
FIGURE 2.
Intrinsic DNA cytidine deaminase activity of AID and A3G constructs. A and B, results from E. coli-based RifR mutation assays, with each X representing data from an independent culture. Median mutation frequencies are indicated by horizontal bars and numbers. Also shown are Western blot analyses of AID or A3G constructs from representative cultures with a nonspecific band (NSB) as a loading control.
To ask whether these observations extended to A3G purified from human cells, we used a DNA oligonucleotide deamination assay optimized to measure catalytic activity. As expected, wild-type A3G catalyzes dose-dependent cytidine-to-uridine deamination of labeled deoxy-oligonucleotide substrates, which following uracil excision and NaOH-mediated phosphodiester backbone cleavage, is detected as a shorter DNA fragment (Fig. 3, A, C, and E). As anticipated from the E. coli mutation experiments, the A3G phospho-mimetic variant T218E showed considerably lower levels of catalytic activity. Interestingly, the A3G phospho-null variant T218A showed significantly elevated levels of catalytic activity consistent with a proportion of the wild-type protein being already phosphorylated (and thereby inactivated) in HEK293T cells. Taken together, the E. coli and the purified protein activity data indicate that phosphorylation of the conserved threonine, AID-Thr-27 or A3G-Thr-218, may serve to attenuate the intrinsic DNA deaminase activity of these proteins (supported further by HEK293T cell extract data in supplemental Fig. S1).
FIGURE 3.
A3G-T218E has diminished deaminase activity but retains DNA binding ability. A, representative images from titrated A3G oligo deaminase assays. The upper band is the intact oligo, and the lower band is the product of deamination, uracil excision, and strand cleavage. B, representative images from A3G ssDNA binding assays. Free oligo and protein-bound complexes are labeled. C, quantification of A3G deaminase activity in A and replicas not shown. Data are plotted as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. D, quantification of A3G EMSA data in B. Data are plotted as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. E, Coomassie-stained gel illustrating the purity of A3G enzymes used in these experiments. F, representative images from AID ssDNA binding assays. G, quantification of AID EMSA data in F. Data are plotted as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. H, Coomassie-stained gel illustrating the purity of AID enzymes used in the ssDNA binding assays. The identity of the AID bands was confirmed by immunoblotting (not shown).
DNA Binding Is Unaffected by Phospho-mimetic Substitutions
To ask whether the diminished catalytic activity of the phospho-mimetic substitution mutants is due to defective ssDNA binding, we tested the ssDNA binding ability of AID and A3G in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. A3G-myc-his used in the deaminase reactions above was used for ssDNA binding experiments. Purified protein was diluted serially, incubated with a fluorescently labeled oligo, and fractionated on a native polyacrylamide gel. As expected, A3G and the catalytic mutant E259Q bound ssDNA in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3, B, D, and E) (48). Likewise, A3G-T218A and A3G-T218E had nearly identical ssDNA binding abilities, which were indistinguishable from the wild-type enzyme (Fig. 3, B, D, and E).
Similar EMSA experiments were done with wild-type AID and mutant derivatives, but the sensitivity of the assay had to be increased by using a radiolabeled ssDNA oligo substrate. Again, the wild-type and the phospho-null and phospho-mimetic variants produced near identical mobility shifts (Fig. 3, F, G, and H). As a control to demonstrate the specificity of AID for ssDNA, an AID-R24E mutant was analyzed in parallel and shown to be defective in DNA binding. This arginine is conserved and homologous to A3G-Arg-215, which NMR chemical shift perturbation and mutagenesis experiments have implicated strongly in DNA binding (5–7). Additional EMSA data can be found in supplemental Fig. S2. Overall, these EMSA results clearly show that phospho-mimetic substitutions in A3G and AID do not cause visible decreases in the ability of each protein to bind ssDNA.
Mutants of AID and A3G Localize Normally within Living Cells
The subcellular localization of AID/APOBEC family members has been well studied (16–20). A3G is predominantly cytoplasmic. AID is also mostly cytoplasmic, but it is imported into the nuclear compartment by an importin-α pathway and exported back to the cytoplasm by a CRM1 pathway. To ask whether our phospho-null or phospho-mimetic mutants retain normal, steady-state subcellular distributions, we performed a series of AID/A3G-GFP localization studies in living HeLa cells. No detectable alteration in the steady-state cytoplasmic distribution of A3G-EGFP, AID-EGFP, or their mutant derivatives was detected (Fig. 4, A and B). Moreover, experiments done in the presence and absence of the CRM1 inhibitor leptomycin B indicated that the nuclear import and export activities were also intact for all AID-EGFP constructs. These data therefore indicate that A3G, AID, and their mutant derivatives are capable of interacting with the cellular factors responsible for localization and, furthermore, that AID is able to enter the nucleus, where it will have the opportunity to access the immunoglobin locus, its physiologic DNA deamination target.
FIGURE 4.
Mutants of A3G and AID localize normally within living cells. A, representative fluorescent images of A3G-EGFP localization in HeLa cells. B, representative images of AID-EGFP localization in HeLa cells in the presence or absence of leptomycin-B (LepB).
AID-T27E Is Defective for Class-switch Recombination
One of the physiological functions of AID is catalyzing cytidine-to-uridine deamination events in immunoglobulin heavy chain gene switch region DNA and thereby triggering additional DNA repair processes that ultimately manifest as antibody isotype switch recombination (1, 45). Therefore, as a functional test of AID activity, we assayed the phospho-null and phospho-mimetic mutants in an ex vivo B-cell CSR system (30–33). Naïve splenic B-lymphocytes were isolated from AID-deficient mice; cultured in the presence of IL-4 and LPS to induce cell division and isotype switching from IgM to IgG1; transduced with retroviruses encoding AID-IRES-EGFP, mutants of AID, or EGFP alone; and 4 days later subjected to flow cytometry for IgG1-positve cells. Mock- (not shown) or EGFP-virus transduced cells remained AID-defective and showed no class switching to IgG1 (Fig. 5). Also, as expected, wild-type AID expression complemented the endogenous defect and enabled class switching to IgG1 in a significant proportion of cells (representative plots in Fig. 5A and average of four experiments in B). Conversely and surprisingly, neither T27A nor T27E was capable of promoting the switch to IgG1 despite similar protein expression levels (Fig. 5, A, B, and C).
FIGURE 5.
AID-T27E is defective for class-switch recombination. A, representative flow cytometry plots of stimulated B lymphocytes transduced with the indicated human AID-IRES-EGFP constructs. Transduction is indicated by GFP expression and CSR by IgG1 expression. B, histogram summarizing the CSR activity from four independent experiments (mean and S.D. of the percentage of IgG1 cells within the GFP-positive-transduced population). C, representative immunoblot of AID expression with tubulin (TUB) as a loading control.
The T27E result was anticipated on the basis of the lower level of catalytic activity, but not DNA binding or localization activities, elicited by this mutant. However, the aforementioned data on AID-T27A showing normal deaminase, ssDNA binding, and cellular localization/trafficking activities strongly suggested that this variant would be capable of normal or even elevated CSR levels, in stark contrast to the defect in CSR shown here. This result makes the CSR data set more difficult to interpret. One possibility, noted previously (31), is that phosphorylation of Ser-38 may depend first upon phosphorylation of Thr-27. An alternative may be that each of these residues has a distinct mechanistic contribution to CSR, with our studies favoring a role for Thr-27 in regulating catalysis.
A3G-T218E Lacks HIV-1 Restriction Activity
A3G potently inhibits HIV-1 replication by blocking reverse transcription and deaminating viral cDNA cytosines to uracils (2). This antiviral activity is most evident in HIV-1 lacking viral infectivity factor (Vif), a small basic protein that triggers A3G degradation. Thus, a rigorous test of the functional activity of A3G is whether it suppresses the spreading infection of Vif-deficient HIV-1 (38, 39, 49). We therefore created a panel of CEM-SS T cell lines stably expressing wild-type A3G-EGFP, an E259Q catalytic mutant control, a phospho-null T218A construct, or a phospho-mimetic T218E protein. As anticipated from prior studies, wild-type A3G completely suppressed the replication of Vif-deficient HIV-1, and its strong antiviral effect was largely dependent upon the integrity of the catalytic glutamate Glu-259 (50, 51) (Fig. 6A). A3G-T218A showed wild-type levels of restriction consistent with full or elevated levels of enzymatic activity. In contrast, A3G-T218E failed to prevent the replication of Vif-deficient HIV-1. However, this mutant protein did cause reproducible delays in peak viral replication consistent with severely attenuated but not fully defective catalytic activity. As additional controls, N-terminal A3G-T32A or T32E substitutions had no discernable effect, and all cell lines supported similar levels of Vif-proficient HIV-1 spreading infection (Fig. 6A and data not shown). It is notable that, although we were able to confirm A3G-Thr-32 phosphorylation by mass spectrometry, we found no differences in the subcellular localization, HIV restriction capacity, or Vif susceptibility in alanine- or glutamate-substituted derivatives (Fig. 4 and data not shown).
FIGURE 6.
A3G-T218E fails to restrict Vif-deficient HIV-1. A, the kinetics of Vif-deficient HIV-1 replication in the indicated stable A3G-expressing T cell lines. A multiplicity of infection of 0.05 was used to initiate infection on day 0, and viral infectivity was measured on subsequent days by titering cell-free supernatants on CEM-GFP indicator cells. B, representative immunoblot of A3G-EGFP (anti-GFP) expression with tubulin (TUB) as a loading control. C, Western blot analyses indicating the presence of A3G in producer cells and viral particles. TUB and p24 are loading controls for cells and viral particles, respectively.
An additional possibility is that A3G-T218E may not restrict HIV-1 because it is not efficiently packaged into budding virions. To test and eliminate such a possibility, we harvested virus produced from HEK293T cells expressing A3G and mutants thereof and blotted for the presence of A3G in these viral particles. We found no significant difference in the ability of any of the mutants to get into virions as compared with wild-type A3G (Fig. 6C).
DISCUSSION
The AID/APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases is an important facet of the adaptive and innate immune responses in humans. However, their mutagenic activity must be tightly regulated to prevent potentially detrimental off-target effects. Regulation of these proteins has been described at multiple levels, including transcription, microRNAs, cytoplasmic localization, proteasomal degradation, and phosphorylation (see introduction). Here we describe a novel phosphorylation regulatory mechanism capable of attenuating the intrinsic deaminase activity of AID and A3G. In this study, we demonstrate that phospho-mimetic substitution of a highly conserved threonine renders these proteins inactive in several independent assays. We show that ssDNA binding ability and steady-state subcellular localization (and for AID, also trafficking) are unaffected, indicating that these proteins are structurally intact. In functional assays, this modification prevents AID from facilitating CSR and A3G from restricting HIV-1ΔVif replication. It is intriguing that two neighboring phosphorylation sites can have such contrasting effects on the function of AID, with Ser-38 phosphorylation enabling interaction with replication protein A and allowing CSR and somatic hypermutation, and Thr-27 phosphorylation rendering the protein inactive. This begs the question of how PKA is regulated to distinguish between these neighboring residues. Further studies are warranted to better understand these posttranslational regulatory events and investigate the possible involvement of other Ser/Thr kinases that can also recognize PKA consensus motifs, such as CaMKII described here.
The obvious utility of posttranslational regulation by phosphorylation is 2-fold (illustrated by the model in supplemental Fig. S3). First, a threonine- or serine-phosphorylated DNA deaminase would possess a low level of DNA deaminase activity and pose less of a threat to genomic DNA. Genomic DNA integrity is further ensured by the fact that AID, A3G, and many other A3 proteins are predominantly cytoplasmic. Second, signal transduction pathways, which are critical for both adaptive and innate immune responses, could readily switch on DNA deaminase activity by triggering the removal of the phosphate group (phosphatase or phosphotransferase activity). This would ensure an expedited immune response that could be further bolstered by up-regulating AID or A3 expression at the transcriptional and/or translational levels.
We propose that the posttranslational modification of AID and the A3 proteins by phosphorylation provides a means of directly controlling the intrinsic DNA cytidine deaminase activity of these proteins (supplemental Fig. S3). It is likely that this mechanism will be conserved in vertebrates because residues homologous to AID-Thr-27, A3G-Thr-32, or Thr-218 are apparent in almost all other known polynucleotide cytidine deaminase family members (Fig. 1). It is further possible that defects in these signal transduction pathways may manifest as immunodeficiency syndromes (overphosphorylated protein), autoimmune diseases (underphosphorylated protein), and/or carcinogenesis (underphosphorylated protein), especially in combination with other regulatory defects.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank L. Potter and G. Veglia for helpful discussions; L. Masterson and G. Veglia for recombinant PKA; J. Johnson and N. Krogan for expert mass spectrometry; W. Brown, A. Davis, and K. Shindo for technical assistance; and V. Barreto, J. Lingappa (through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagents Program), F. Randow, and N. Somia for contributing reagents.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-AI064046 and R01-GM080437 and National Institutes of Health Grant T32-AI007313 (to Z. L. D.).

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1–3.
- AID
- activation-induced deaminase
- A3G
- apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic subunit 3G
- APOBEC3G
- apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic subunit
- PKA
- protein kinase A
- CSR
- class-switch recombination
- EGFP
- enhanced green fluorescent protein
- CaMKII
- calcium calmodulin-dependent kinase II
- ssDNA
- single-stranded DNA
- Vif
- viral infectivity factor.
REFERENCES
- 1. Di Noia J. M., Neuberger M. S. (2007) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 1–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Malim M. H., Emerman M. (2008) Cell Host Microbe 3, 388–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Conticello S. G. (2008) Genome Biol. 9, 229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shandilya S. M., Nalam M. N., Nalivaika E. A., Gross P. J., Valesano J. C., Shindo K., Li M., Munson M., Royer W. E., Harjes E., Kono T., Matsuo H., Harris R. S., Somasundaran M., Schiffer C. A. (2010) Structure 18, 28–38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chen K. M., Harjes E., Gross P. J., Fahmy A., Lu Y., Shindo K., Harris R. S., Matsuo H. (2008) Nature 452, 116–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Harjes E., Gross P. J., Chen K. M., Lu Y., Shindo K., Nowarski R., Gross J. D., Kotler M., Harris R. S., Matsuo H. (2009) J. Mol. Biol. 389, 819–832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Holden L. G., Prochnow C., Chang Y. P., Bransteitter R., Chelico L., Sen U., Stevens R. C., Goodman M. F., Chen X. S. (2008) Nature 456, 121–124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Prochnow C., Bransteitter R., Klein M. G., Goodman M. F., Chen X. S. (2007) Nature 445, 447–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Koning F. A., Newman E. N., Kim E. Y., Kunstman K. J., Wolinsky S. M., Malim M. H. (2009) J. Virol. 83, 9474–9485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Muramatsu M., Sankaranand V. S., Anant S., Sugai M., Kinoshita K., Davidson N. O., Honjo T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18470–18476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Refsland E. W., Stenglein M. D., Shindo K., Albin J. S., Brown W. L., Harris R. S. (2010) Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4274–4284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dedeoglu F., Horwitz B., Chaudhuri J., Alt F. W., Geha R. S. (2004) Int. Immunol. 16, 395–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Farrow M. A., Kim E. Y., Wolinsky S. M., Sheehy A. M. (2011) J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2567–2577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Dorsett Y., McBride K. M., Jankovic M., Gazumyan A., Thai T. H., Robbiani D. F., Di Virgilio M., Reina San-Martin B., Heidkamp G., Schwickert T. A., Eisenreich T., Rajewsky K., Nussenzweig M. C. (2008) Immunity 28, 630–638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Teng G., Hakimpour P., Landgraf P., Rice A., Tuschl T., Casellas R., Papavasiliou F. N. (2008) Immunity 28, 621–629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ito S., Nagaoka H., Shinkura R., Begum N., Muramatsu M., Nakata M., Honjo T. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 1975–1980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. McBride K. M., Barreto V., Ramiro A. R., Stavropoulos P., Nussenzweig M. C. (2004) J. Exp. Med. 199, 1235–1244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Patenaude A. M., Orthwein A., Hu Y., Campo V. A., Kavli B., Buschiazzo A., Di Noia J. M. (2009) Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 517–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Stenglein M. D., Matsuo H., Harris R. S. (2008) J. Virol. 82, 9591–9599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bennett R. P., Presnyak V., Wedekind J. E., Smith H. C. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7320–7327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Aoufouchi S., Faili A., Zober C., D'Orlando O., Weller S., Weill J. C., Reynaud C. A. (2008) J. Exp. Med. 205, 1357–1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sheehy A. M., Gaddis N. C., Malim M. H. (2003) Nat. Med. 9, 1404–1407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Stopak K., de Noronha C., Yonemoto W., Greene W. C. (2003) Mol. Cell 12, 591–601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Conticello S. G., Harris R. S., Neuberger M. S. (2003) Curr. Biol. 13, 2009–2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. MacDuff D. A., Neuberger M. S., Harris R. S. (2006) Mol. Immunol. 43, 1099–1108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chaudhuri J., Khuong C., Alt F. W. (2004) Nature 430, 992–998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Orthwein A., Patenaude A. M., Affar el B., Lamarre A., Young J. C., Di Noia J. M. (2010) J. Exp. Med. 207, 2751–2765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Maeda K., Singh S. K., Eda K., Kitabatake M., Pham P., Goodman M. F., Sakaguchi N. (2010) J. Biol. Chem. 285, 23945–23953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Demorest Z. L., MacDuff D. A., Brown W. L., Morham S. G., Parise L. V., Harris R. S. (2010) PLoS ONE 5, e11660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Conticello S. G., Ganesh K., Xue K., Lu M., Rada C., Neuberger M. S. (2008) Mol. Cell 31, 474–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Basu U., Chaudhuri J., Alpert C., Dutt S., Ranganath S., Li G., Schrum J. P., Manis J. P., Alt F. W. (2005) Nature 438, 508–511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McBride K. M., Gazumyan A., Woo E. M., Barreto V. M., Robbiani D. F., Chait B. T., Nussenzweig M. C. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8798–8803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Pasqualucci L., Kitaura Y., Gu H., Dalla-Favera R. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 395–400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shirakawa K., Takaori-Kondo A., Yokoyama M., Izumi T., Matsui M., Io K., Sato T., Sato H., Uchiyama T. (2008) Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1184–1191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pham P., Smolka M. B., Calabrese P., Landolph A., Zhang K., Zhou H., Goodman M. F. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17428–17439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Stenglein M. D., Harris R. S. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16837–16841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. MacDuff D. A., Demorest Z. L., Harris R. S. (2009) Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1854–1867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Albin J. S., Haché G., Hultquist J. F., Brown W. L., Harris R. S. (2010) J. Virol. 84, 10209–10219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Haché G., Shindo K., Albin J. S., Harris R. S. (2008) Curr. Biol. 18, 819–824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Masterson L. R., Shi L., Metcalfe E., Gao J., Taylor S. S., Veglia G. (2011) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6969–6974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Harris R. S., Petersen-Mahrt S. K., Neuberger M. S. (2002) Mol. Cell 10, 1247–1253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Petersen-Mahrt S. K., Harris R. S., Neuberger M. S. (2002) Nature 418, 99–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Shlyakhtenko L. S., Lushnikov A. Y., Li M., Lackey L., Harris R. S., Lyubchenko Y. L. (2011) J. Biol. Chem. 286, 3387–3395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Larue R. S., Lengyel J., Jónsson S. R., Andrésdóttir V., Harris R. S. (2010) J. Virol. 84, 8193–8201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Muramatsu M., Kinoshita K., Fagarasan S., Yamada S., Shinkai Y., Honjo T. (2000) Cell 102, 553–563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Amanchy R., Periaswamy B., Mathivanan S., Reddy R., Tattikota S. G., Pandey A. (2007) Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 285–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. OhAinle M., Kerns J. A., Li M. M., Malik H. S., Emerman M. (2008) Cell Host Microbe 4, 249–259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Iwatani Y., Takeuchi H., Strebel K., Levin J. G. (2006) J. Virol. 80, 5992–6002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gervaix A., West D., Leoni L. M., Richman D. D., Wong-Staal F., Corbeil J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 4653–4658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Browne E. P., Allers C., Landau N. R. (2009) Virology 387, 313–321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Schumacher A. J., Haché G., Macduff D. A., Brown W. L., Harris R. S. (2008) J. Virol. 82, 2652–2660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






