Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Hematol. 2011 Jul;18(4):239–248. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283476140

The Biology of CD44 and HCELL in Hematopoiesis: The “Step 2-bypass Pathway” and other Emerging Perspectives

Robert Sackstein 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC3145154  NIHMSID: NIHMS313357  PMID: 21546828

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The homing and egress of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) to and from marrow, respectively, and the proliferation and differentiation of HSPCs within marrow, are complex processes critically regulated by the ordered expression and function of adhesion molecules that direct key cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. The integral membrane molecule CD44, known primarily for its role in binding hyaluronic acid, is characteristically expressed on HSPCs. Conspicuously, human HSPCs uniquely display a specialized glycoform of CD44 known as Hematopoietic Cell E-/L-selectin Ligand (HCELL), which is the most potent ligand for both E-selectin and L-selectin expressed on human cells. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the biology of CD44 and HCELL in hematopoiesis.

Recent Findings

New data indicate that CD44-mediated events in hematopoiesis are more complex than previously imagined. Ex vivo glycan engineering has established that HCELL serves as a “bone marrow homing receptor”. Moreover, biochemical studies now show that CD44 forms bimolecular complexes with a variety of membrane proteins, one of which is VLA-4. Engagement of CD44 or of HCELL directly induces VLA-4 activation via G-protein-dependent signaling, triggering a “Step 2-bypass Pathway” of cell migration, and extravascular lodgment, in absence of chemokine receptor engagement.

Summary

Recent studies have further clarified the roles of CD44 and its glycoform HCELL in hematopoietic processes, providing key insights on how targeting these molecules may be beneficial in promoting hematopoiesis and in treating hematologic malignancies.

Keywords: HCELL, Step 2-bypass pathway of cell migration, multistep paradigm, CD44, bimolecular complex

Introduction

There is a rather bewildering array of structures and activities related to CD44. By intent, this review focuses on recent findings related to the biology of CD44 in hematopoiesis. From all current data, a unifying perspective for CD44 biology in hematopoiesis is proposed here, with profound implications for both normal and malignant hematopoiesis. To provide requisite foundation for understanding these contemporary data and notions, however, it is necessary to first summarize key features of CD44 multistructural and multifunctional properties. It is recognized that the foregoing description is limited in scope, and, for more comprehensive background information, the reader is referred to several excellent reviews on CD44 that are cited herein.

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF CD44

CD44 is a ubiquitously expressed integral membrane glycoprotein which displays tremendous structural heterogeneity resulting from a wide variety of protein polymorphisms and post-translational modifications. The CD44 gene of all mammals is arranged into two groups comprising “standard” exons and “variant” exons, yielding single-chain proteins that, in fully processed form, range in size from ~80 kDa to more than 200 kDa [1]. The standard exon group comprises 10 exons, numbered usually as exons 1–5 and 16–20, but here designated as exons s1–s5 and s6–s10, respectively (see Figure 1). CD44 protein containing only standard exons is known as “CD44s” (also, “CD44H”, see below). This isoform consists of 341 amino acids in humans (predicted core molecular weight (m.w.) of ~37 kDa). Fully processed CD44s ranges in m.w. from ~80#x2013;110kDa (depending on cell type), and includes an extracellular domain of 248 residues, a transmembrane region of 21 residues, and a 72 amino acid cytoplasmic tail. Exons s1–s5 encode an N-terminal globular domain which is stabilized by intermolecular disulfide bonds (via three pairs of cysteines), and exons s6 and s7 encode the membrane proximal region. The transmembrane region is encoded by exon s8, and exons s8–s10 together encode the cytoplasmic tail.

FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of CD44 gene structure in mouse and man.

FIGURE 1

The CD44 gene is located on chromosome 2 in humans and 11 in mice. The red X shown in variant exon 1 (V1) designates the absence of a functional V1 product in humans due to the presence of an in-frame stop codon. Parentheses below blocks show usual numbering of CD44 exons; for clarity, exons here are depicted as members of two groups: Standard (S) and Variant (V). See text for details.

CD44 proteins designated as “CD44v” contain the peptide products of the standard exons and also products of variant exons, each encoded by transcripts inserted between exons s5 and s6 (i.e., exons 5 and 16). There are 10 variant exons expressed in mice (designated v1–v10), whereas humans express only variant exons v2–v10 due to the presence of an in-frame stop codon in exon v1 [2]. The large number of variant exons results in multiple protein isoforms (theoretically, 768 possibilities [3]), of which over 20 have been well-characterized [1]. The largest CD44v protein, called “epican”, contains peptides derived in tandem from variant exons v3–v8 and is typically found on keratinocytes [4,5]. Notably, mammalian HSPCs characteristically express only the CD44s isoform (known also as CD44H, for “Hematopoietic” CD44) [6,7,8]. Mature hematopoietic cells also typically express CD44s, but CD44v isoforms can be found on various native and malignant myeloid cells and lymphoid cells [6,8,9,10,11]. In general, CD44v isoforms are most commonly expressed on epithelial cells and on non-hematopoietic cancer cells (for review, see [1]).

In addition to protein polymorphisms, diversity of CD44 structure is also engendered by a wide variety of post-translational modifications. CD44 can be covalently modified by several glycosaminoglycans (GAG), including chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), heparan sulfate (HS) and keratan sulfate (KS). All CD44 isoforms bearing covalent GAG substitutions have m.w. in excess of 110 kDa, and, by definition, are members of the “proteoglycan” family. CD44s displays a GAG linkage consensus amino acid motif (SGXS) in the membrane proximal region of the extracellular portion [12], and CD44s covalently bearing KS, DS, and, more commonly, CS has been reported [13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, typically, chondroitin sulfate and, more specifically, heparan sulfate covalent modifications are found within isoforms containing the v3 region that contains an SGSG sequence together with downstream regulatory amino acids that enable HS substitution [12,19]. As might be expected by its repertoire of variant sequences, epican can be modified by CS, HS and KS [20].

GAG modifications impart distinct ligand specificities on CD44 isoforms. For example, substitution of CD44s and of CD44v isoforms with CS licenses binding to a variety of extracellular matrix molecules, including fibronectin, laminin, and collagen (types I, IV, VI and XIV) [17,21,22,23,24,25,26], though binding to collagen by CD44s has been observed in absence of CS modification [27]. Attachment with either CS or DS promotes CD44 binding to fibrinogen/fibrin [15,18]. Modification with HS mediates CD44 presentation of growth factors such as basic-fibroblast growth factor, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor [28,29], and modification by HS and/or CS also mediates CD44 binding/presentation of certain chemokines [30,31,32].

CD44 is best known for serving as a receptor for hyaluronic acid (HA), a non-sulfated GAG. The globular head region contains the lectin motif that directs binding of CD44 to HA [33]. Although all CD44 isoforms contain this HA binding pocket, many cells that display high levels of CD44 (especially hematopoietic cells, including human CD34+ HSPCs [34,35,36]) do not constitutively bind HA (for review, see [1,37]). The capacity of CD44 to bind HA is critically regulated by post-translational modifications. Sulfation of CD44 and distinct CD44 carbohydrate modifications can each independently modulate the capacity to engage HA. In addition to GAG substitutions, CD44 is abundantly decorated with both N- and O-linked glycosylations ([38], for review see [1]). Sulfation of CD44 can occur on tyrosines [39], or, more commonly, on attached GAGs (predominantly via chondroitin sulfate [38]) or on glycans attached to the core protein (predominantly N-linked [38,40]). Dynamic sulfation of CD44, induced by inflammatory cytokines such as TNF [40], upregulates adhesion to HA. In contrast, modification of CD44 glycans with terminal sialic acids inhibits binding to HA [41,42]. CD44 glycan modifications on hematopoietic cells can be modulated by cytokines, resulting in either inhibition or stimulation of HA binding depending on the cytokine [35,43,44]. Notably, myeloid cells express a cell surface sialidase, inducible by TNF and by ligation of CD44, that cleaves terminal sialic acids and upregulates CD44 adherence to HA [44,45,46]. Conversely, whereas sialylation inhibits HA binding, it is requisite for function of the HCELL glycoform of CD44 that potently binds selectins (discussed in more detail below).

CD44 functions as a critical signaling receptor in a wide variety of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells, both native and malignant. Though details are beyond the scope of this review, it is well-recognized that ligation of CD44, either by natural ligands or by anti-CD44 antibody, is associated with activation of a variety of cell signaling pathways that regulate cell biology, including cell migration, survival and proliferation, cytokine production, and cytolytic activities (for review see [47,48,49]). CD44 is found in lipid rafts of the plasma membrane, coupled to a variety of protein tyrosine kinases and other signaling effectors. The intracytoplasmic tail of CD44 can be phosphorylated, and though phosphorylation may not be necessary for HA binding [50], it appears to regulate HA-dependent cell migration [51]. The tail is also complexed with ankyrin [27,52] and with other cytoskeletal proteins (i.e., ezrin-moesin-radixin) that link to spectrin and actin, respectively [53,54]. In this manner, CD44 forms an important sensor of the microenvironment, connecting the extracellular milieu with the cytoskeleton, and vice-versa. The surface distribution of CD44 can markedly change with cell migration and with changes in the milieu, and there is evidence that palmitoylation of CD44 regulates partitioning into lipid rafts and binding to ankyrin [55,56].

HCELL: MUCH MORE THAN `SWEET' CD44

Studies over several decades have shown that HA is a critical structural and regulatory component of hematopoietic microenvironments, with its various effects mediated via CD44 ligation [57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. In addition to its function as an HA receptor, CD44 in human HSPCs executes a unique role exercised by a specialized glycoform, “Hematopoeitic Cell E-/L-selectin Ligand” (HCELL), that contains sialofucosylated lactosamines (reviewed in [62]). These sialofucosylated glycans, displayed as the terminal tetrasaccharide known as sLex, are the prototypical binding determinants for selectins, a family of three C-type lectins: L-selectin (expressed on HSPCs, and mature myeloid and lymphoid cells), E-selectin (expressed on endothelial cells), and P-selectin (expressed on platelets and endothelial cells) [63]. HCELL was first defined functionally by its unique selectin ligand properties well before it was discovered to be a novel glycovariant of CD44 [64, 65, 66]. Though CD44 serves as the scaffold to display the pertinent selectin-binding glycans, it is inaccurate to state that “CD44 is a selectin ligand” for several reasons. To begin, the working end of HCELL is not the CD44 protein, it is the carbohydrates: indeed, HCELL activity is retained in the presence of complete denaturation of the CD44 protein core [66, 67, 68]. Thus, the glycan modifications alone confer the new biology on CD44. Importantly, whereas CD44 is uniformly recognized as a lectin (i.e., it binds the carbohydrate HA), HCELL is a ligand for lectins. Moreover, only HCELL, among all CD44 isoforms and glycovariants, mediates cell-cell interactions via adhesion to integral membrane glycoproteins (i.e., E-selectin and L-selectin). Apart from these abundant structural and operational features that clearly distinguish HCELL among all CD44 structures, there is etymologic precedent for designating this structure by proper label, just as the E-selectin-binding glycoform of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) is conventionally known as “Cutaneous Lymphocyte Antigen” (“CLA”, reviewed in [62]) and certain CD44 isoforms have specific titles (e.g., “Epican”) to differentiate them from other moieties.

HCELL is the most potent E- and L-selectin ligand found on human cells. It is widely expressed on human HSPCs (CD34+ cells), but not on mouse HSPCs (Lin-/c-Kit+/Sca-1+ cells), and its expression is profoundly upregulated by G-CSF administration [69]. HCELL is also characteristically expressed on human leukemic blasts, but is not present on normal myeloid, erythroid, lymphoid, or megakaryocytic progenitors, nor on mature blood cells [66, 67, 68, 69]. On all human HSPCs and leukemic blasts that express HCELL, the relevant sLex determinants are exclusively displayed on N-glycans located in the globular head of CD44s [66]. Importantly, the fact that HCELL is a distinctly human HSPC glycoprotein indicates that findings derived exclusively from mouse models actually underrepresent the breadth of CD44 biology in human hematopoiesis.

UNIFYING PERSPECTIVES IN HEMATOPOIESIS: HCELL AND CD44, AND THEIR “SIGNIFICANT OTHERS”

The absence of HCELL on murine HSPCs has hindered studies on its function in vivo, but a critical role for HCELL in early hematopoietic events can be inferred from the fact that it is expressed only on primitive human hematopoietic progenitors. In general, selectins and their ligands are best known for mediating cell-cell adhesive interactions under fluid shear conditions, thereby promoting initial attachment of blood-borne cells onto endothelial surfaces (reviewed in [70]). E-selectin expression on endothelial cells is tightly regulated by inflammatory cytokines that induce transient transcription of its mRNA, followed by translation of mature protein. However, intravital microscopy in mice has shown that migration of HSPCs to marrow is mediated by constitutive expression of E-selectin on marrow microvessels, colocalized uniquely with the chemokine CXCL12 (SDF-1), precisely at endothelial beds that are the sites of cellular recruitment [71]. These and other observations have led to a multistep model of cell migration to marrow, wherein expression of E-selectin ligands and of CXCR4 (the receptor for chemokine CXCL12) on blood-borne HSPCs triggers marrow homing (reviewed in [63]). According to the model, E-selectin receptor/ligand interactions mediate initial tethering/rolling-type interactions of circulating cells onto the endothelial surface (Step 1), whereby the cells can engage CXCL12 via CXCR4, resulting in G-protein-coupled activation of the β1 integrin VLA-4 (which is expressed on HSPCs) (Step 2). Activated VLA-4 then mediates firm adherence by binding to its ligand VCAM-1 (which is also constitutively expressed on marrow endothelial beds) (Step 3), followed by transendothelial migration (Step 4) (see Figure 2). Due to its potency in binding E-selectin, we reasoned that HCELL could serve as a key Step 1 effector in this process. To examine the effect(s) of HCELL expression on osteotropism of circulating cells, we developed a platform technology called “Glycosyltransferase-Programmed Stereosubstitution” (GPS) for custom-modifying glycans on the surface of living cells and utilized a target cell devoid of Step 1 effectors, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [72]. Using GPS, the native CD44 on human MSCs was converted into HCELL, without effects on cell viability or multipotency; enforced HCELL expression was transient (lost within 72 hours), likely due to natural turnover of cell surface CD44. Notably, the human MSCs used in these studies expressed VLA-4, but did not express CXCR4. Intravital microscopy in immunocompromised mice showed that intravenously administered HCELL+ human MSCs homed to marrow, with infiltrates evident within one hour post-injection. These data thus provide direct evidence that HCELL is a “bone marrow homing receptor” and, furthermore, that CXCR4 signaling is dispensable for marrow infiltration by HCELL+ MSC.

FIGURE 2. The Canonical Multistep Paradigm of Cell Migration.

FIGURE 2

Schematic representation of the multiple steps in cell migration from vascular to extravascular compartments. Step 2 integrin activation via chemokine receptor/ligand interactions confers selectivity in cell recruitment, depending on the relevant chemokine(s) present in the target endothelial bed and the chemokine receptor(s) expressed by circulating cell(s). Depicted here is the conventional view of cellular homing to marrow: Following initial tethering/rolling contact of blood-borne cell on the endothelium (Step 1), chemokine receptor CXCR4 binds to its cognate ligand CXCL1 (SDF-1), thereby triggering G-protein-coupled VLA-4 activation (Step 2), with subsequent firm adhesion (Step 3) and transmigration (Step 4).

The observation that HCELL+ human MSC infiltrated murine marrow in vivo without CXCR4 signaling raised the possibility that MSC transendothelial migration may be encoded by chemokine-independent pathways. Recent investigations using human MSC show that this is the case: engagement of HCELL (via E-selectin) or of CD44 (via HA) in each case triggers VLA-4 activation via G-protein-dependent signal transduction [73]; activated VLA-4 thus binds to its ligands VCAM-1 and fibronectin, and, on endothelial cells stimulated to express both E-selectin and VCAM-1, MSC transmigration occurs without chemokine input [73]. These findings establish an expanded role for HCELL and for CD44 as effectors of cell migration, unveiling a previously unrecognized dimension of mechanosignaling that mediates a “step 2-bypass pathway” of the canonical multistep paradigm (see Figure 3). A formal modification of the “address” concept of cell migration proposed in the original description [74] of the multistep cascade is now required: although Step 2 integrin activation is retained, it is best to refer to this novel pathway as a “step 2-bypass” since the chemokine receptor/ligand combinatorial diversity inherent to conventional Step 2 is by-passed by mechanosignaling-triggered integrin activation, and, hence, chemokine-dependent selectivity in cell recruitment is obviated. Since marrow endothelial cells express HA in addition to E-selectin [61, 75], this step 2-bypass pathway could program trafficking of HSPCs to marrow independently of CXCR4, and could thus account for the finding that CXCR4-deficient HSPCs can migrate to marrow [76]. Such CD44/VLA-4 crosstalk could also profoundly affect localization of extravasated cells via engagement with respective extracellular matrix ligands, HA and fibronectin, programming lodgment of HSPCs, and of MSCs, at discrete hematopoietic microenvironments within the marrow parenchyma. Moreover, since MSCs express VCAM-1 [77] and also produce copious amounts of HA [78] [79], CD44/VLA-4 crosstalk could firmly anchor HSPCs to HA/VCAM-1-laden MSCs in the hematopoietic “niche” [80]. Indeed, this notion is supported by studies performed decades ago [81, 82, 83].

FIGURE 3. The Step 2-bypass Pathway of Cell Migration.

FIGURE 3

Schematic representation of steps in cell migration for blood-borne cells expressing HCELL together with VLA-4, encountering endothelial beds expressing E-selectin and VCAM-1. Note that compared to canonical pathway (see Figure 2), VLA-4 activation (Step 2) occurs via G-protein-mediated mechanosignalling primed by HCELL binding to E-selectin (and/or activated CD44 binding to endothelial HA), bypassing the need for chemokine input.

Biochemical studies now show that CD44 and VLA-4 form a bimolecular complex on MSC membranes [73] similar to that reported previously on lymphoid cells [84]. Prior studies indicated that binding of CD44v isoforms to osteopontin, a chemoattractant and regulatory constituent of the hematopoietic niche, is also dependent on CD44 coupling with β1 integrins [85]. These findings highlight yet another remarkable feature of CD44: its propensity to physically and functionally partner with heterologous glycoproteins on the cell surface (see Table 1). Cross-immunoprecipitation studies in various cells have revealed that, in addition to serving to anchor growth factors such as HBEGF and bFGF (discussed above), CD44 can form cooperating complexes with an array of membrane growth factor receptors, including VEGFR2 (KDR) [86], c-Met [87], TGFβR1 [88] and HER2 [89] (and, possibly, other ErbB receptor family members [49]), as well as the receptor for migration inhibitory factor (and invariant polypeptide of MHC II), CD74 [90]. For each CD44-receptor complex, it is important to define if/how CD44 mediates observed hematopoietic effects currently attributed to the receptor: for example, whether engagement of CD44 impacts the observed myelosuppressive effects of TGFβR1 signaling in myelodysplastic syndrome [91]. It is of interest that HER2 is expressed on subsets of human hematopoietic cells, and its expression is upregulated on cycling HSPCs [92]. Importantly, both c-Met and VEGFR2 are expressed on early HSPCs [93, 94], and each contributes in various ways to both normal and malignant hematopoiesis [95, 96, 97]. For the case of c-Met, activation by its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) requires CD44 cooperation to organize cytoskeletal association(s) with Met-specific signaling components [87]. During G-CSF mobilization, CXCL12 induces HGF release from marrow neutrophils, and HGF induces HSPC mobilization [98, 99] in part due to upregulation of the matrix metalloproteases MMP9 and MT1-MMP [98]. It is well-recognized that CD44 anchors cell surface presentation of MMP9 [100, 101] and of MT1-MMP [102], the latter also serving to cleave CD44 from the cell surface [103]. Recent studies in mice have further clarified this biology, showing that G-CSF-induced HSPC mobilization is dependent on MT1-MMP-mediated cleavage of membrane CD44 [104]. Consistent with these findings in mice, following G-CSF mobilization in humans, there is evidence that circulating CD34+ cells show diminished CD44 expression compared to steady-state marrow counterparts [105, 106]), but a more informative study would be to compare CD44 levels and HCELL expression in blood and marrow CD34+ cells, concomitantly, during G-CSF treatment [107].

TABLE 1.

CD44 Bimolecular Complexes: “Significant Other” Cell Membrane Molecules

Growth Factor Receptors
 c-Met
 HER2 (?other ErbB family members)
 TGFβ1 receptor
 VEGFR2
Chemokine Receptors
 CD74
Adhesion Molecules
 VLA-4

Studies in knock-out mice show that CD44 is not necessary for hematopoiesis, but, compared to wild-type, affected mice show markedly increased numbers of HSPC in marrow relative to spleen, and defective HSPC mobilization following G-CSF administration [108]. The fact that CD44-deficient mice have relatively normal hematopoiesis and no overt developmental deficits is consistent with the reported compensation in HA binding by other HSPC HA receptors such as RHAMM [109], which is known to be upregulated in CD44-deficient mice [110]. More specifically, in adult wild-type animals, interference with CD44 biology (e.g., by use of function-blocking mAb) has yielded significant effect(s) on hematopoiesis. Importantly, despite absence of HCELL expression in mouse HSPCs, studies in wild-type models have shown that CD44 is critical for both marrow homing and lodgement of HSPCs [61,111], and that engagement of CXCR4 (by CXCL12) upregulates CD44 adhesion to HA [61]. Conversely, administration of anti-CD44 mAb induces mobilization of HSPCs [112,113].

CONCLUSION: EMERGING PERSPECTIVES ON CD44 BIOLOGY IN HEMATOPOIESIS

Clearly, the fact that CD44 co-associates with a variety of surface molecules, including growth factors, proteases, and other adhesion molecules, indicates a broader and more significant role for CD44 in both normal and malignant hematopoiesis than previously perceived, well beyond its well-recognized role as a receptor for HA and selectins. At present, we cannot be confident that we know the identity of all cell membrane molecules that can partner with CD44 (see Table 1 for existing list). However, with current information, it is possible to offer several novel perspectives on CD44 biology in hematopoiesis.

The capacity to enforce HCELL expression, together with the fact that CD44 forms a functional bimolecular complex with VLA-4, offers exciting opportunities to augment cell migration to marrow for all clinical indications, especially hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in settings of limited numbers of donor cells (e.g., cord blood transplants). Similarly, because both E-selectin and VCAM-1 are upregulated in endothelial beds at all sites of tissue injury/inflammation, enforced HCELL expression could be exploited to enable stem cell-based regenerative medicine and other adoptive cell therapeutics (e.g., immunotherapy for malignancy) for a variety of conditions. For at least two cell surface receptors, c-Met and CD74, the CD44 molecule is the obligatory signaling component of the receptor [87,90]. Thus, targeting CD44 may offer novel ways of modulating c-Met and CD74 activity. Indeed, the finding that antibody to CD74 induces cell death of malignant lymphoid cells may say more about CD44 than about CD74 itself [114]. In this regard, it is important to emphasize that a large body of evidence has shown that, depending on leukemic subtype and the specific antibody employed, anti-CD44 mAbs are effective in directly killing and/or forcing differentiation of human leukemic blasts in vitro ([44,115,116], reviewed in [117]), and are capable of selectively eliminating human leukemic stem cells in vivo [118]. The capacity of different CD44-specific antibodies to induce varying biologic reactions despite targeting the same molecule suggests that such variable effects are secondary to interruption of functional CD44 cooperating complexes and/or variable signaling induced by ligation of specific CD44 epitopes. Importantly, induced leukemia models in mice have shown a role for CD44 in homing and engraftment of leukemic stem cells [119], and have also shown that high level expression of cell surface CD44 maintains the leukemic phenotype following withdrawal of the instigating transformation event [120]. These data indicate that the effect(s) of CD44 in normal and malignant hematopoiesis reflect not only CD44-mediated cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesive interactions, but also a combination and balance of CD44-dependent signals, via CD44 itself and/or its cooperating partners. Thus, despite decades of study of CD44, there is much more yet to learn regarding the complex multistructural/multifunctional tapestry of this remarkable molecule.

KEY POINTS

  • (1)

    CD44 is a multistructural and multifunctional molecule that serves as the principal receptor for hyaluronic acid, and is a key mediator of both normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

  • (2)

    A specialized glycoform of CD44 known as “HCELL” is expressed on human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and serves as the most potent E-selectin and L-selectin ligand on human cells.

  • (3)

    CD44 (and/or HCELL) can form a functional biomolecular complex with integrin VLA-4, whereby engagement of CD44/HCELL triggers G-protein-dependent upregulation of VLA-4 adhesiveness and transendothelial migration of cells without chemokine input (“Step 2- bypass Pathway”).

  • (4)

    Besides VLA-4, CD44 forms bimolecular complexes with various growth factor and chemokine receptors, and mediates intracellular signaling for receptors c-Met and CD74.

  • (5)

    Monoclonal antibodies directed to CD44 are capable of inducing differentiation and/or death of human leukemic blasts, depending on the subtype of leukemia and the epitope targeted by the mAb.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This review is dedicated to the memory of my beloved father, Harold C. Sackstein, who passed away during the preparation of this article. One cannot study CD44 without first accepting the challenge of its colossal structural complexity, and it was he, more than anyone, who inspired and taught me to confront hurdles straight on.

I wish to thank my colleagues for their past and present landmark contributions to our understanding of CD44 biology, and express regret to those whose work I could not discuss nor cite due to space considerations. I am also forever grateful to my talented and devoted co-workers over the past three decades for their great assistance in helping me to elucidate the structure and biology of HCELL. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL60528, HL073714, and CA121335.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: In accordance with NIH guidelines, intellectual property related to HCELL expression is retained by the author.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Naor D, Sionov RV, Ish-Shalom D. CD44: structure, function, and association with the malignant process. Adv Cancer Res. 1997;71:241–319. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Screaton GR, Bell MV, Bell JI, Jackson DG. The identification of a new alternative exon with highly restricted tissue expression in transcripts encoding the mouse Pgp-1 (CD44) homing receptor. Comparison of all 10 variable exons between mouse, human, and rat. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:12235–12238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Weering DH, Baas PD, Bos JL. A PCR-based method for the analysis of human CD44 splice products. PCR Methods Appl. 1993;3:100–106. doi: 10.1101/gr.3.2.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kugelman LC, Ganguly S, Haggerty JG, et al. The core protein of epican, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan on keratinocytes, is an alternative form of CD44. J Invest Dermatol. 1992;99:886–891. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12614896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Milstone LM, Hough-Monroe L, Kugelman LC, et al. Epican, a heparan/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan form of CD44, mediates cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 1994;107(Pt 11):3183–3190. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.11.3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ghaffari S, Dougherty GJ, Lansdorp PM, et al. Differentiation-associated changes in CD44 isoform expression during normal hematopoiesis and their alteration in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1995;86:2976–2985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Neu S, Geiselhart A, Sproll M, et al. Expression of CD44 isoforms by highly enriched CD34-positive cells in cord blood, bone marrow and leukaphereses. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20:593–598. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khaldoyanidi S, Karakhanova S, Sleeman J, et al. CD44 variant-specific antibodies trigger hemopoiesis by selective release of cytokines from bone marrow macrophages. Blood. 2002;99:3955–3961. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.11.3955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arch R, Wirth K, Hofmann M, et al. Participation in normal immune responses of a metastasis-inducing splice variant of CD44. Science. 1992;257:682–685. doi: 10.1126/science.1496383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Galluzzo E, Albi N, Fiorucci S, et al. Involvement of CD44 variant isoforms in hyaluronate adhesion by human activated T cells. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:2932–2939. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830251033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khaldoyanidi S, Achtnich M, Hehlmann R, Zoller M. Expression of CD44 variant isoforms in peripheral blood leukocytes in malignant lymphoma and leukemia: inverse correlation between expression and tumor progression. Leuk Res. 1996;20:839–851. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(96)00048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greenfield B, Wang WC, Marquardt H, et al. Characterization of the heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate assembly sites in CD44. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2511–2517. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jalkanen S, Jalkanen M, Bargatze R, et al. Biochemical properties of glycoproteins involved in lymphocyte recognition of high endothelial venules in man. J Immunol. 1988;141:1615–1623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Takahashi K, Stamenkovic I, Cutler M, et al. Keratan sulfate modification of CD44 modulates adhesion to hyaluronate. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:9490–9496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clark RA, Lin F, Greiling D, et al. Fibroblast invasive migration into fibronectin/fibrin gels requires a previously uncharacterized dermatan sulfate-CD44 proteoglycan. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:266–277. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202X.2004.22205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Esford LE, Maiti A, Bader SA, et al. Analysis of CD44 interactions with hyaluronan in murine L cell fibroblasts deficient in glycosaminoglycan synthesis: a role for chondroitin sulfate. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 7):1021–1029. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.7.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Faassen AE, Schrager JA, Klein DJ, et al. A cell surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, immunologically related to CD44, is involved in type I collagen-mediated melanoma cell motility and invasion. J Cell Biol. 1992;116:521–531. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.2.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Henke CA, Roongta U, Mickelson DJ, et al. CD44-related chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, a cell surface receptor implicated with tumor cell invasion, mediates endothelial cell migration on fibrinogen and invasion into a fibrin matrix. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2541–2552. doi: 10.1172/JCI118702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jackson DG, Bell JI, Dickinson R, et al. Proteoglycan forms of the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 are alternatively spliced variants containing the v3 exon. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:673–685. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou J, Haggerty JG, Milstone LM. Growth and differentiation regulate CD44 expression on human keratinocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1999;35:228–235. doi: 10.1007/s11626-999-0031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jalkanen S, Jalkanen M. Lymphocyte CD44 binds the COOH-terminal heparin-binding domain of fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1992;116:817–825. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.3.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wayner EA, Carter WG. Identification of multiple cell adhesion receptors for collagen and fibronectin in human fibrosarcoma cells possessing unique alpha and common beta subunits. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:1873–1884. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carter WG, Wayner EA. Characterization of the class III collagen receptor, a phosphorylated, transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in nucleated human cells. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:4193–4201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Knutson JR, Iida J, Fields GB, McCarthy JB. CD44/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan and alpha 2 beta 1 integrin mediate human melanoma cell migration on type IV collagen and invasion of basement membranes. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:383–396. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.3.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baronas-Lowell D, Lauer-Fields JL, Borgia JA, et al. Differential modulation of human melanoma cell metalloproteinase expression by alpha2beta1 integrin and CD44 triple-helical ligands derived from type IV collagen. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:43503–43513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405979200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ehnis T, Dieterich W, Bauer M, et al. A chondroitin/dermatan sulfate form of CD44 is a receptor for collagen XIV (undulin) Exp Cell Res. 1996;229:388–397. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lokeshwar VB, Bourguignon LY. Post-translational protein modification and expression of ankyrin-binding site(s) in GP85 (Pgp-1/CD44) and its biosynthetic precursors during T-lymphoma membrane biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:17983–17989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bennett KL, Jackson DG, Simon JC, et al. CD44 isoforms containing exon V3 are responsible for the presentation of heparin-binding growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:687–698. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jones M, Tussey L, Athanasou N, Jackson DG. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan isoforms of the CD44 hyaluronan receptor induced in human inflammatory macrophages can function as paracrine regulators of fibroblast growth factor action. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7964–7974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tanaka Y, Adams DH, Hubscher S, et al. T-cell adhesion induced by proteoglycan-immobilized cytokine MIP-1 beta. Nature. 1993;361:79–82. doi: 10.1038/361079a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wolff EA, Greenfield B, Taub DD, et al. Generation of artificial proteoglycans containing glycosaminoglycan-modified CD44. Demonstration of the interaction between rantes and chondroitin sulfate. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2518–2524. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Charnaux N, Brule S, Chaigneau T, et al. RANTES (CCL5) induces a CCR5-dependent accelerated shedding of syndecan-1 (CD138) and syndecan-4 from HeLa cells and forms complexes with the shed ectodomains of these proteoglycans as well as with those of CD44. Glycobiology. 2005;15:119–130. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Teriete P, Banerji S, Noble M, et al. Structure of the regulatory hyaluronan binding domain in the inflammatory leukocyte homing receptor CD44. Mol Cell. 2004;13:483–496. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lewinsohn DM, Nagler A, Ginzton N, et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell expression of the H-CAM (CD44) homing-associated adhesion molecule. Blood. 1990;75:589–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Legras S, Levesque JP, Charrad R, et al. CD44-mediated adhesiveness of human hematopoietic progenitors to hyaluronan is modulated by cytokines. Blood. 1997;89:1905–1914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deguchi T, Komada Y. Homing-associated cell adhesion molecule (HCAM/CD44) on human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;40:25–37. doi: 10.3109/10428190009054878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lesley J, Hyman R, Kincade PW. CD44 and its interaction with extracellular matrix. Adv Immunol. 1993;54:271–335. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60537-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brown TA, Bouchard T, St John T, et al. Human keratinocytes express a new CD44 core protein (CD44E) as a heparan-sulfate intrinsic membrane proteoglycan with additional exons. J Cell Biol. 1991;113:207–221. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sleeman JP, Rahmsdorf U, Steffen A, et al. CD44 variant exon v5 encodes a tyrosine that is sulphated. Eur J Biochem. 1998;255:74–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2550074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Maiti A, Maki G, Johnson P. TNF-alpha induction of CD44-mediated leukocyte adhesion by sulfation. Science. 1998;282:941–943. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5390.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Katoh S, Zheng Z, Oritani K, et al. Glycosylation of CD44 negatively regulates its recognition of hyaluronan. J Exp Med. 1995;182:419–429. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Skelton TP, Zeng C, Nocks A, Stamenkovic I. Glycosylation provides both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on cell surface and soluble CD44 binding to hyaluronan. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:431–446. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.2.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Levesque MC, Haynes BF. TNFalpha and IL-4 regulation of hyaluronan binding to monocyte CD44 involves posttranslational modification of CD44. Cell Immunol. 1999;193:209–218. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1999.1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gadhoum SZ, Sackstein R. CD15 expression in human myeloid cell differentiation is regulated by sialidase activity. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:751–757. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Katoh S, Miyagi T, Taniguchi H, et al. Cutting edge: an inducible sialidase regulates the hyaluronic acid binding ability of CD44-bearing human monocytes. J Immunol. 1999;162:5058–5061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gee K, Kozlowski M, Kumar A. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces functionally active hyaluronan-adhesive CD44 by activating sialidase through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytic cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:37275–37287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302309200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ilangumaran S, Borisch B, Hoessli DC. Signal transduction via CD44: role of plasma membrane microdomains. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999;35:455–469. doi: 10.1080/10428199909169610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bourguignon LY. Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 activation of RhoGTPase signaling and cytoskeleton function promotes tumor progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ponta H, Sherman L, Herrlich PA. CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:33–45. doi: 10.1038/nrm1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Uff CR, Neame SJ, Isacke CM. Hyaluronan binding by CD44 is regulated by a phosphorylation-independent mechanism. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:1883–1887. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Peck D, Isacke CM. Hyaluronan-dependent cell migration can be blocked by a CD44 cytoplasmic domain peptide containing a phosphoserine at position 325. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 11):1595–1601. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.11.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bourguignon LY, Lokeshwar VB, He J, et al. A CD44-like endothelial cell transmembrane glycoprotein (GP116) interacts with extracellular matrix and ankyrin. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:4464–4471. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tsukita S, Oishi K, Sato N, et al. ERM family members as molecular linkers between the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 and actin-based cytoskeletons. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:391–401. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yonemura S, Hirao M, Doi Y, et al. Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to a positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxta-membrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:885–895. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Thankamony SP, Knudson W. Acylation of CD44 and its association with lipid rafts are required for receptor and hyaluronan endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34601–34609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601530200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bourguignon LY, Kalomiris EL, Lokeshwar VB. Acylation of the lymphoma transmembrane glycoprotein, GP85, may be required for GP85-ankyrin interaction. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:11761–11765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Noordegraaf EM, Ploemacher RE. Studies of the haemopoietic microenvironment. II. Content of glycosaminoglycans in murine bone marrow and spleen under anaemic and polycythaemic conditions. Scand J Haematol. 1979;22:327–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Noordegraaf EM, Erkens-Versluis EA, Ploemacher RE. Studies of the hemopoietic microenvironments. V. Changes in murine splenic and bone marrow glycosaminoglycans during post irradiation hemopoietic regeneration. Exp Hematol. 1981;9:326–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khaldoyanidi S, Moll J, Karakhanova S, et al. Hyaluronate-enhanced hematopoiesis: two different receptors trigger the release of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 from bone marrow macrophages. Blood. 1999;94:940–949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Matrosova VY, Orlovskaya IA, Serobyan N, Khaldoyanidi SK. Hyaluronic acid facilitates the recovery of hematopoiesis following 5-fluorouracil administration. Stem Cells. 2004;22:544–555. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Avigdor A, Goichberg P, Shivtiel S, et al. CD44 and hyaluronic acid cooperate with SDF-1 in the trafficking of human CD34+ stem/progenitor cells to bone marrow. Blood. 2004;103:2981–2989. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sackstein R. Glycosyltransferase-programmed stereosubstitution (GPS) to create HCELL: engineering a roadmap for cell migration. Immunol Rev. 2009;230:51–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00792.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sackstein R. The bone marrow is akin to skin: HCELL and the biology of hematopoietic stem cell homing. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1061–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.09301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Oxley SM, Sackstein R. Detection of an L-selectin ligand on a hematopoietic progenitor cell line. Blood. 1994;84:3299–3306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sackstein R, Fu L, Allen KL. A hematopoietic cell L-selectin ligand exhibits sulfate-independent binding activity. Blood. 1997;89:2773–2781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sackstein R, Dimitroff CJ. A hematopoietic cell L-selectin ligand that is distinct from PSGL-1 and displays N-glycan-dependent binding activity. Blood. 2000;96:2765–2774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dimitroff CJ, Lee JY, Fuhlbrigge RC, Sackstein R. A distinct glycoform of CD44 is an L-selectin ligand on human hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13841–13846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250484797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dimitroff CJ, Lee JY, Rafii S, et al. CD44 is a major E-selectin ligand on human hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:1277–1286. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dagia NM, Gadhoum SZ, Knoblauch CA, et al. G-CSF induces E-selectin ligand expression on human myeloid cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:1185–1190. doi: 10.1038/nm1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sackstein R. The lymphocyte homing receptors: gatekeepers of the multistep paradigm. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005;12:444–450. doi: 10.1097/01.moh.0000177827.78280.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sipkins DA, Wei X, Wu JW, et al. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature. 2005;435:969–973. doi: 10.1038/nature03703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sackstein R, Merzaban JS, Cain DW, et al. Ex vivo glycan engineering of CD44 programs human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell trafficking to bone. Nat Med. 2008;14:181–187. doi: 10.1038/nm1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thankamony SP, Sackstein R. Enforced hematopoietic cell E- and L-selectin ligand (HCELL) expression primes transendothelial migration of human mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2258–2263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018064108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** This study shows that CD44 ligation drives transendothelial migration of human mesenchymal stem cells across stimulated human endothelial cells via a CD44-mediated Rac1/Rap1-dependent G-protein-coupled activation of VLA-4; this is the first description of the molecular effectors of a Step 2-bypass pathway of the conventional multistep paradigm.
  • 74.Butcher EC. Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell. 1991;67:1033–1036. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90279-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Okada T, Hawley RG, Kodaka M, Okuno H. Significance of VLA-4-VCAM-1 interaction and CD44 for transendothelial invasion in a bone marrow metastatic myeloma model. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999;17:623–629. doi: 10.1023/a:1006715504719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Foudi A, Jarrier P, Zhang Y, et al. Reduced retention of radioprotective hematopoietic cells within the bone marrow microenvironment in CXCR4−/−chimeric mice. Blood. 2006;107:2243–2251. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Simmons PJ, Masinovsky B, Longenecker BM, et al. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by bone marrow stromal cells mediates the binding of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1992;80:388–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wight TN, Kinsella MG, Keating A, Singer JW. Proteoglycans in human long-term bone marrow cultures: biochemical and ultrastructural analyses. Blood. 1986;67:1333–1343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Miyake K, Underhill CB, Lesley J, Kincade PW. Hyaluronate can function as a cell adhesion molecule and CD44 participates in hyaluronate recognition. J Exp Med. 1990;172:69–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wagner W, Wein F, Roderburg C, et al. Adhesion of human hematopoietic progenitor cells to mesenchymal stromal cells involves CD44. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;188:160–169. doi: 10.1159/000112821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Miyake K, Medina KL, Hayashi S, et al. Monoclonal antibodies to Pgp-1/CD44 block lympho-hemopoiesis in long-term bone marrow cultures. J Exp Med. 1990;171:477–488. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Miyake K, Weissman IL, Greenberger JS, Kincade PW. Evidence for a role of the integrin VLA-4 in lympho-hemopoiesis. J Exp Med. 1991;173:599–607. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.3.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Verfaillie CM, Benis A, Iida J, et al. Adhesion of committed human hematopoietic progenitors to synthetic peptides from the C-terminal heparin-binding domain of fibronectin: cooperation between the integrin alpha 4 beta 1 and the CD44 adhesion receptor. Blood. 1994;84:1802–1811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nandi A, Estess P, Siegelman M. Bimolecular complex between rolling and firm adhesion receptors required for cell arrest; CD44 association with VLA-4 in T cell extravasation. Immunity. 2004;20:455–465. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Katagiri YU, Sleeman J, Fujii H, et al. CD44 variants but not CD44s cooperate with beta1-containing integrins to permit cells to bind to osteopontin independently of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid, thereby stimulating cell motility and chemotaxis. Cancer Res. 1999;59:219–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tremmel M, Matzke A, Albrecht I, et al. A CD44v6 peptide reveals a role of CD44 in VEGFR-2 signaling and angiogenesis. Blood. 2009;114:5236–5244. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-219204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Orian-Rousseau V, Chen L, Sleeman JP, et al. CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16:3074–3086. doi: 10.1101/gad.242602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bourguignon LY, Singleton PA, Zhu H, Zhou B. Hyaluronan promotes signaling interaction between CD44 and the transforming growth factor beta receptor I in metastatic breast tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:39703–39712. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204320200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bourguignon LY, Zhu H, Chu A, et al. Interaction between the adhesion receptor, CD44, and the oncogene product, p185HER2, promotes human ovarian tumor cell activation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27913–27918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Shi X, Leng L, Wang T, et al. CD44 is the signaling component of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor-CD74 receptor complex. Immunity. 2006;25:595–606. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhou L, Nguyen AN, Sohal D, et al. Inhibition of the TGF-beta receptor I kinase promotes hematopoiesis in MDS. Blood. 2008;112:3434–3443. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-139824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Leone F, Perissinotto E, Cavalloni G, et al. Expression of the c-ErbB-2/HER2 proto-oncogene in normal hematopoietic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74:593–601. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0203068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Goff JP, Shields DS, Petersen BE, et al. Synergistic effects of hepatocyte growth factor on human cord blood CD34+ progenitor cells are the result of c-met receptor expression. Stem Cells. 1996;14:592–602. doi: 10.1002/stem.140592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ziegler BL, Valtieri M, Porada GA, et al. KDR receptor: a key marker defining hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 1999;285:1553–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5433.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ikehara S. Role of hepatocyte growth factor in hemopoiesis. Leuk Lymphoma. 1996;23:297–303. doi: 10.3109/10428199609054832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hooper AT, Butler JM, Nolan DJ, et al. Engraftment and reconstitution of hematopoiesis is dependent on VEGFR2-mediated regeneration of sinusoidal endothelial cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Santos SC, Dias S. Internal and external autocrine VEGF/KDR loops regulate survival of subsets of acute leukemia through distinct signaling pathways. Blood. 2004;103:3883–3889. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jalili A, Shirvaikar N, Marquez-Curtis LA, et al. The HGF/c-Met axis synergizes with G-CSF in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1143–1151. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * This report provides evidence that plasma HGF levels are higher in patients whose HSPCs mobilize well after G-CSF, with in vitro studies of human cells showing that HGF and G-CSF each enhance expression of MMP9 and MT1-MMP.
  • 99.Tesio M, Golan K, Corso S, et al. Enhanced c-Met activity promotes G-CSF-induced mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells via ROS signaling. Blood. 2010;117:419–428. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-230359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** This study using mouse models and cells introduces the previously unappreciated role that stress-induced mobilization proceeds via c-Met-dependent generation of cellular reactive oxygen species.
  • 100.Bourguignon LY, Gunja-Smith Z, Iida N, et al. CD44v(3,8–10) is involved in cytoskeleton-mediated tumor cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) association in metastatic breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 1998;176:206–215. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199807)176:1<206::AID-JCP22>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Desai B, Ma T, Zhu J, Chellaiah MA. Characterization of the expression of variant and standard CD44 in prostate cancer cells: identification of the possible molecular mechanism of CD44/MMP9 complex formation on the cell surface. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:272–284. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mori H, Tomari T, Koshikawa N, et al. CD44 directs membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase to lamellipodia by associating with its hemopexin-like domain. EMBO J. 2002;21:3949–3959. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kajita M, Itoh Y, Chiba T, et al. Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase cleaves CD44 and promotes cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:893–904. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.5.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Vagima Y, Avigdor A, Goichberg P, et al. MT1-MMP and RECK are involved in human CD34+ progenitor cell retention, egress, and mobilization. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:492–503. doi: 10.1172/JCI36541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Lee S, Im SA, Yoo ES, et al. Mobilization kinetics of CD34(+) cells in association with modulation of CD44 and CD31 expression during continuous intravenous administration of G-CSF in normal donors. Stem Cells. 2000;18:281–286. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.18-4-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sovalat H, Racadot E, Ojeda M, et al. CD34+ cells and CD34+CD38− subset from mobilized blood show different patterns of adhesion molecules compared to those from steady-state blood, bone marrow, and cord blood. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2003;12:473–489. doi: 10.1089/152581603322448187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Elfenbein GJ, Sackstein R. Primed marrow for autologous and allogeneic transplantation: a review comparing primed marrow to mobilized blood and steady-state marrow. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:327–339. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Schmits R, Filmus J, Gerwin N, et al. CD44 regulates hematopoietic progenitor distribution, granuloma formation, and tumorigenicity. Blood. 1997;90:2217–2233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Pilarski LM, Pruski E, Wizniak J, et al. Potential role for hyaluronan and the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM in mobilization and trafficking of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1999;93:2918–2927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Nedvetzki S, Gonen E, Assayag N, et al. RHAMM, a receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility, compensates for CD44 in inflamed CD44-knockout mice: a different interpretation of redundancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:18081–18086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407378102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Khaldoyanidi S, Denzel A, Zoller M. Requirement for CD44 in proliferation and homing of hematopoietic precursor cells. J Leukoc Biol. 1996;60:579–592. doi: 10.1002/jlb.60.5.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Vermeulen M, Le Pesteur F, Gagnerault MC, et al. Role of adhesion molecules in the homing and mobilization of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1998;92:894–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Christ O, Kronenwett R, Haas R, Zoller M. Combining G-CSF with a blockade of adhesion strongly improves the reconstitutive capacity of mobilized hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol. 2001;29:380–390. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00674-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hertlein E, Triantafillou G, Sass EJ, et al. Milatuzumab immunoliposomes induce cell death in CLL by promoting accumulation of CD74 on the surface of B cells. Blood. 2010;116:2554–2558. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * This report describes that crosslinking of surface CD74 with a humanized anti-CD74 mAb leads to death of CLL cells, an effect that could be mediated by CD44-dependent signaling.
  • 115.Charrad RS, Li Y, Delpech B, et al. Ligation of the CD44 adhesion molecule reverses blockage of differentiation in human acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 1999;5:669–676. doi: 10.1038/9518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Bourcier S, Sansonetti A, Durand L, et al. CD44-ligation induces, through ERK1/2 pathway, synthesis of cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-6 required for differentiation of THP-1 monoblastic leukemia cells. Leukemia. 2010;24:1372–1375. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * These data, obtained in a human monocytic leukemia cell line, suggest that anti-CD44 mAb reverse the blockade of differentiation by stimulating production of differentiation-inducing cytokines.
  • 117.Gadhoum Z, Delaunay J, Maquarre E, et al. The effect of anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies on differentiation and proliferation of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;45:1501–1510. doi: 10.1080/1042819042000206687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Jin L, Hope KJ, Zhai Q, et al. Targeting of CD44 eradicates human acute myeloid leukemic stem cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:1167–1174. doi: 10.1038/nm1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Krause DS, Lazarides K, von Andrian UH, Van Etten RA. Requirement for CD44 in homing and engraftment of BCR-ABL-expressing leukemic stem cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:1175–1180. doi: 10.1038/nm1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Quere R, Andradottir S, Brun AC, et al. High levels of the adhesion molecule CD44 on leukemic cells generate acute myeloid leukemia relapse after withdrawal of the initial transforming event. Leukemia. 2010 doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.281. doi:10.1038/leu.2010.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** This comprehensive study, using a tetracycline-inducible mouse model of AML, indicates that “cell extrinsic” factors involving CD44-dependent processes can perpetuate acute leukemia following cessation of the inciting event.

RESOURCES