Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2011 Aug;77(15):5212–5219. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00210-11

Isolation and Characterization of Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov., a Novel Hydrogenotrophic Methanogen from the Shengli Oil Field,

Lei Cheng 1,2, Lirong Dai 2, Xia Li 2, Hui Zhang 2, Yahai Lu 1,*
PMCID: PMC3147489  PMID: 21705537

Abstract

Syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis is an alternative methanogenic pathway in certain thermophilic anaerobic environments such as high-temperature oil reservoirs and thermophilic biogas reactors. In these environments, the dominant thermophilic methanogens were generally related to uncultured organisms of the genus Methanothermobacter. Here we isolated two representative strains, Tm2T and HMD, from the oil sands and oil production water in the Shengli oil field in the People's Republic of China. The type strain, Tm2T, was nonmotile and stained Gram positive. The cells were straight to slightly curved rods (0.3 μm in width and 2.2 to 5.9 μm in length), but some of them possessed a coccal shape connecting with the rods at the ends. Strain Tm2T grew with H2-CO2, but acetate is required. Optimum growth of strain Tm2T occurred in the presence of 0.025 g/liter NaCl at pH 6.9 and a temperature of 65°C. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 40.1 mol% ± 1.3 mol% (by the thermal denaturation method) or 41.1 mol% (by high-performance liquid chromatography). Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that Tm2T was most closely related to Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔHT and Methanothermobacter wolfeii VKM B-1829T (both with a sequence similarity of 96.4%). Based on these phenotypic and phylogenic characteristics, a novel species was proposed and named Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov. The type strain is Tm2T (ACCC 00699T = JCM 17393T).

INTRODUCTION

Methanogenesis is the terminal process of organic compound degradation and plays a major role in the global carbon cycle, occurring in a variety of natural and artificial environments, such as the gastrointestinal tracts of animals, rice paddy soils, deep subsurface marine or freshwater sediments, and anaerobic bioreactors (14, 28). The most important precursors for methane production during anaerobic digestion of organic matter are acetate and H2-CO2, which are converted into methane by aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens (28), respectively. However, an alternative pathway for acetate is syntrophic acetate oxidation followed by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (65). Several bacteria responsible for acetate oxidation have been isolated and characterized (17, 25, 48, 60), and a series of reports revealed that this process is present in high-temperature oil reservoirs (15, 33, 40), thermophilic or mesophilic biogas reactors (16, 21, 23, 43, 49), lake sediments (41), and rice paddy soils (27). Interestingly, it is proposed that syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis is the main methanogenic pathway in high-temperature petroleum reservoirs (33) and probably involved in the thermophilic methanogenic degradation of hydrocarbon (15). Cloning of rRNA genes from these environments indicates that the dominant thermophilic hydrogenotrophic methanogens were found to be affiliated with the genus Methanothermobacter. However, to our knowledge, pure isolates have not been described. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of two strains, Tm2T and HMD, belonging to a novel phylotype of Methanothermobacter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples and media.

The production water of oil reservoirs was collected from the Shengli oil field in 2007 and maintained in our lab at a temperature of 4°C. The oil reservoir is located 1,680 to 1,800 m below the sea floor and has a pressure of 9.24 MPa. The in situ temperature of the reservoir ranges from 75°C to 80°C, and the total salt concentration of the oil production water is 9,794 mg/liter. The oil sands comprised crude oil (30.2%), water (52.8%), and other solid sands. They were sampled from oil-water separating tanks at the Haoxian central facility of the Shengli oil field in 2003 and maintained at room temperature.

Saltwater medium containing (per liter) 20.0 g NaCl, 0.5 g MgCl·6H2O, 0.15 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.3 g NH4Cl, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g KCl, and 0.5 g l-cysteine hydrochloride (13) was used for enrichment and purification. It was autoclaved for 30 min at 121°C and then reduced with Na2S·9H2O (0.03%). A solution of sterile NaHCO3 (0.25%), a vitamin solution (2 ml/liter) (34), trace element solution SL-7 (2 ml/liter) (61), vitamin B12 (2 ml/liter) (13), and vitamin B1 (2 ml/liter) (13) were injected into the medium before inoculation, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 to 7.2. The basal medium used was composed of 0.5 g NaCl, 0.5 g MgCl·6H2O, 0.1 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.3 g NH4Cl, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g KCl, and 0.5 g l-cysteine hydrochloride (13). Modified DSM medium 119 was prepared with (per liter) 0.5 g KH2PO4, 0.4 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.4 g NaCl, 0.4 g NH4Cl, 0.05 g CaCl2·2H2O, 1.0 ml trace element solution SL-7 (61), 1.0 g yeast extract (YE), 1.0 g sodium acetate, 2.0 g sodium formate, 5.0 ml sludge fluid (prepared according to the instructions for DSM medium 119), 2.5 g NaHCO3, 0.5 g cysteine-HCl·H2O, and 0.5 g Na2S·9H2O, and the pH was adjusted to 6.7 to 7.0. Aliquots were distributed into glass vials sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum caps or transferred into anaerobic tubes. All of the media were prepared anaerobically under a gas atmosphere of 80% N2 and 20% CO2 via the Hungate anaerobic technique (31), in which resazurin (1 mg/liter) is a redox indicator.

Enrichment and purification.

Samples (about 10 g) of oil sands were distributed into 120-ml vials containing 50 ml saltwater medium and incubated statically at 55°C in the dark. After 118 days, the initial preenrichment with positive methane production was transferred into fresh saltwater medium and incubated statically at 55°C in the dark.

After several months of incubation, the Hungate roll tube and serial-dilution methods were applied for the isolation of pure cultures (18). Approximately 0.5-ml methanogenic enrichments were serially diluted in 5 ml of saltwater medium in roll tubes and incubated at 55°C with 1.5% melting agar amended with sodium acetate (0.1 mmol/liter), trimethylamine (0.1 mmol/liter), and a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa). Fluorescent colonies (420 nm) were picked into saltwater medium with the addition of YE (0.5 g/liter), sodium acetate (0.1 mmol/liter), and trimethylamine (0.1 mmol/liter) under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa). After several repeated isolations, pure cultures were obtained and assessed with a purity test medium that contained 4.0 g beef extract, 10.0 g Trypticase peptone, 10.0 g YE (Oxoid), 4.0 g glucose, 1.0 g maltose, 1.0 g soluble starch, 5.0 g NaCl, 0.001 g resazurin, 0.5 g cysteine-HCl·H2O, and1 liter distilled water with the pH adjusted to 7.0 to 7.5 (5). Purity tests were conducted under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions.

The other methanogenic enrichment was obtained from a 10-ml mixture of oil production water in 50 ml medium at 60°C, and a serial-dilution method was used to isolate the thermophilic methanogen under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa).

Methods of analysis.

CH4 and CO2 were analyzed with a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu GC 2010) with a Porapak Q column and a thermal conductivity detector. The column, oven, and detector temperatures were 50°C, 50°C, and 70°C, respectively. The carrier gas was hydrogen (99.999%) at a flow rate of 50 ml/min. Gas, 0.2 ml, was injected into the column using pressure lock syringes (Vici). The total amount of each gas was calculated based on Avogadro's law after calibration with a gas mixture of N2, CH4, and CO2 at 29.96%, 39.99%, and 30.05%, respectively.

Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC; Shimadzu GC-7AG) with a stainless steel column packed with GDX103 (pretreatment with 5% phosphoric acid) and a flame ionization detector. The temperatures of the injection port, oven, and detector were 210°C, 180°C, and 210°C, respectively. Nitrogen was supplied as the carrier gas, and the flow rates of nitrogen, hydrogen, and air were 70, 50, and 500 ml/min, respectively. After acidification with H2SO4 to pH <2 and centrifugation, 10 μl of supernatant was injected for GC analysis with a data processor (Shimadzu C-R1B). A mixture of 100 ppm acetic acid, 100 ppm propionic acid, and100 ppm butyric acid was used as an external standard.

Growth and genomic characteristics. (i) Microscopy.

Cultures were regularly observed under a phase-contrast and immunofluorescence microscope (Nikon 80i). The Gram reaction was determined as described previously (2). A Hitachi 3400N scanning electron microscope was used to observe cell morphology (5); cells were negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and observed in a JEM 1230 transmission electron microscope (36).

(ii) Biochemical and physiological analyses.

To investigate potential substrates, sodium formate (20 mM), sodium acetate (20 mM), trimethylamine (20 mM), monomethylamine (20 mM), ethanol (20 mM), dimethyl sulfide (10 mM), isopropanol (10 mM), isobutanol (10 mM), 2-butanol (10 mM), and H2-CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa) were tested separately in triplicate in modified DSM medium 119 at 65°C in the dark.

Required growth factors were tested in basal medium at 65°C with H2-CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa) in which each component of the medium was added as follows: (i) a mixture of coenzyme M (coM; 25 mg/liter), YE (1 g/liter), and vitamins and trace element solution SL-7 (2 ml/liter) (34, 61); (ii) coM (25 mg/liter); (iii) sludge fluid (10 ml/liter); (iv) a mixture of vitamin and trace elements solutions SL-7 (2 ml/liter) (34, 61); (v) YE (1 g/liter); (vi) sodium acetate (10 mM); (vii) NiCl2 (0.01 g/liter); and (viii) selenite-tungstate solution (0.01 ml/liter) (52). The effect of pH on strain Tm2T was determined in basal medium amended with YE (1 g/liter) and sodium acetate (0.1 g/liter) at 65°C. The pH was adjusted from 5.5 to 9.0 at room temperature with different buffers (morpholineethanesulfonic acid for pH 6 to 6.5, CO2-bicarbonate buffer for pH 7, Tris-HCl for pH 7.5 to 8.5, and sodium carbonate-bicarbonate buffer for pH 9) under different partial pressures of CO2 (38 kPa for pH 6 to 7.0, 25 kPa for pH 7.5 to 8.5, and 13 kPa for pH 9.0) and a constant partial pressure of H2 (152 kPa) in the headspace (5). The effect of temperature on strain Tm2T was determined in basal medium amended with YE (1 g/liter) and sodium acetate (0.1 g/liter) with temperatures ranging from 40 to 85°C under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa). The effect of the NaCl concentration on strain Tm2T was determined in basal medium amended with sodium acetate (0.1 g/liter) at a pH of 7.0 to 7.2 under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa) at 65°C. All of the experiments mentioned above were carried out statically in triplicate with 20 ml of medium (60-ml vials) which was inoculated (5%, vol/vol) with a culture in the exponential growth phase.

(iii) Susceptibility experiments.

The sensitivity of strain Tm2T to the antibiotics ampicillin (200 mg/liter), rifampin (20 mg/liter), neomycin (20 mg/liter), chloramphenicol (20 mg/liter), apramycin (20 mg/liter), kanamycin (100 mg/liter), and penicillin G (10 mg/liter) was tested in 10 ml of basal medium amended with YE (1 g/liter) and sodium acetate (0.1 g/liter) with H2-CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa) at 65°C. Growth was determined from methane production. SDS susceptibility tests were performed with SDS concentrations of 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% (wt/vol) (2).

(iv) G+C content determination.

Genomic DNA was isolated by SDS treatment after grinding under liquid N2 as previously described (19), and its G+C content was determined by the thermal denaturation (Tm) method (6, 32) and the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (35). The genomic DNA of Escherichia coli K-12 was used as a reference.

Phylogenetic analysis.

About 1.5 ml of liquid culture was collected for genomic DNA extraction by bead beating (42). DNA products were purified with the Promega Wizard DNA cleanup system (Promega) and stored at −25°C. The 16S rRNA and mcrA gene fragments were amplified using primers Ar21F/1492R, Ar109f/Ar915r, and MCRf/MCRr, respectively (8, 29, 53), reaction mixtures of 50 μl consisted of 10 to 50 ng template DNA, 5 μl 10× PCR buffer, 4 μl deoxynucleoside triphosphates (each at 2.5 mM), 3 μl MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.25 μl TaKaRa Taq (5 U/μl), and 1 μl each of the forward and reverse primers (10 μM for the 16S rRNA gene and 50 μM for the mcrA gene). Amplification with archaeal primers Ar21F and 1492R was carried out as follows: 94°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 52°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Amplification with archaeal primers Ar109f and Ar915r was described previously (42). PCR cycles of mcrA genes were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 94°C; 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 50°C, and 90 s at 72°C for a total of 27 amplification cycles; and finally 5 min at 72°C. The PCR product was purified with the LangGang general DNA agarose gel recovery kit (LangGang Biotech Co., Ltd.). The cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA and partial mcrA gene fragments were conducted according to Rui et al. (46). The 16S rRNA gene sequences were checked for chimeras with the Bellerophon program of the Greengene database (9), and aligned with sequences in Ribosomal Database Project release 10 to search for the most closely related sequences (1, 7). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the methanogenic enrichment clone were aligned with the ClustalX software (24), the distance matrices were calculated using the DNAdist software of the PHYLIP 3.69 package (12), and then the sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the furthest-neighbor clustering algorithm of the DOTUR software with a 98% threshold (47). Phylogenetic trees were constructed and compared for consistency by using the neighbor-joining, minimum-evolution, and maximum-parsimony methods in the MEGA 4.0 software (54). Bootstrap values were calculated after 1,000 replications.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains Tm2T and HMD and the partial mcrA gene sequence of strain Tm2T were deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers HQ283273, HQ828065, and HQ283274, respectively. The GenBank accession numbers of methanogenic enrichment clones are HQ845184 to HQ845192.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Enrichment and purification.

The initial preenrichment from oil sands with positive methane production was transferred into fresh saltwater medium (80 ml). Methane production was steady for 87 days at an average rate of 2.5 μmol/day before decreasing to approximately 0.7 μmol/day. The main VFA detected was acetate, which declined from 205 μmol at day 87 to 34 μmol after 302 days (Fig. 1), suggesting that methane was produced from acetate degradation (Fig. 1). Propionate was also detected at a low concentration. A molecular survey of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone library constructed from the first transfer of methanogenic enrichment at 302 days revealed that the archaeal community consisted of two groups OTU1 (6 clones) and OTU2 (3 clones), which were affiliated with the type strains of Methanothermobacter wolfeii DSM 2970T (95.7% sequence similarity, AB104858) and Methanolinea tarda NOBI-1T (81.5% sequence similarity, AB162774), respectively. The enrichment was serially diluted in 5 ml saltwater medium in Hungate roll tubes with 1.5% melting agar and incubated at 55°C. After 2 months of incubation, fluorescent colonies (ca. 1 mm in diameter) were picked into saltwater medium in roll tubes with YE (0.5 g/liter), sodium acetate (0.1 mmol/liter), and trimethylamine (0.1 mmol/liter) under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa). After 1 month of incubation at 55°C, strain Tm2 was obtained. It was considered pure by the following criteria: no growth in purity test medium, no PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and homogeneous sequences of archaeal 16S rRNA genes. Another methanogenic enrichment incubation at 60°C from oil production water was transferred repeatedly into saltwater medium with added YE and sodium acetate under a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4/1, vol/vol, 200 kPa). A hydrogenotrophic methanogen named HMD was purified by the serial-dilution method in liquid medium. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that gene sequence of strain HMD was almost identical to that of strain Tm2T (99.4% similarity). Therefore, strain Tm2T was characterized further in detail.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Methane production and acetate degradation during the second transfer methanogenic enrichment. d, days.

Morphology.

Strain Tm2T was slightly curved rods (0.3 μm in width and 2.2 to 5.9 μm in length) that occurred singly or in pairs. A flagellum was not observed, but some cells displayed a coccoid shape connected at the end of the rod cells (Fig. 2 A and B). Fluorescence microscopy indicated that these coccal cells contained F420 coenzyme (see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining suggested that they contained DNA (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). These coccoid-shaped cells were observed at both the log phase and the stationary phase. It remains unclear why the methanogen Tm2T possesses two morphologies. White and irregular colonies (0.5 to 1 mm in diameter) were detected under a phase-contrast and immunofluorescence microscope. The cells of strain Tm2T were not motile and were not lysed in 1% SDS.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cellular morphology of strain Tm2T. (A) Scanning electron micrograph. Bar, 2 μm. Arrows indicate coccoid-shaped cells. (B) Negative-stained micrograph. Bar, 5 μm.

Biochemical and physiological characterization.

Strain Tm2T grew with H2-CO2 but not sodium formate, sodium acetate, trimethylamine, monomethylamine, ethanol, dimethyl sulfide, isopropanol, isobutanol, or 2-butanol. Acetate was a required growth factor in basal medium, while YE, coM, vitamin solutions, trace element solutions, selenite-tungstate solution, and NiCl2 were not necessary for growth. Strain Tm2T grew optimally at a pH of 6.9, no growth was observed at pH 6.6 or 8.9 (Fig. 3 A). The strain grew between 55 and 80°C, with the fastest growth at 65°C, but no growth occurred below 45°C or above 85°C (Fig. 3B). Strain Tm2T grew fastest at an NaCl concentration of 0.025 g/liter and grew within a range of 0.025 to 30 g/liter. Minor growth was also detected above 40 g/liter NaCl (Fig. 3C). Based on its CH4 production rate (44), the growth of strain Tm2T was completely inhibited by chloramphenicol and rifampin, partially inhibited by ampicillin, apramycin, kanamycin, and neomycin, and not affected by penicillin G (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Influence of pH (A), temperature (B), and NaCl (C) on the growth of strain Tm2T in 20 ml basal medium with sodium acetate, and/or YE in the headspace of H2-CO2.

Genomic and phylogenetic characterization.

The genomic DNA G+C content of strain Tm2T was 40.1 ± 1.3 (mean ± standard deviation) or 41.1 mol%, based on the Tm or HPLC method, respectively. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that the sequences of strain Tm2T possessed 96.4% similarity to that of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔHT and Methanothermobacter wolfeii VKM B-1829T (Fig. 4). The inferred amino acid sequence of the partial mcrA gene of strain Tm2T showed 90.0% similarity to that of Methanobacterium ivanovii DSM 2611T, Methanobacterium bryantii DSM 863T, and Methanobacterium aarhusense H2-LRT (Fig. 5) but had low bootstrap support (<50%) in phylogenetic treeing. The family Methanobacteriaceae currently comprises four genera, Methanobrevibacter, Methanosphaera, Methanobacterium, and Methanothermobacter. These genera have been isolated from various natural and artificial environments, such as the gastrointestinal tracts of animals, anaerobic bioreactors, rice paddy soils, and marine or freshwater sediments (3, 30, 37, 39, 45, 51). Most of the representatives of the family use H2-CO2 as a substrate for methanogenesis, except for Methanosphaera stadtmaniae, which depends on hydrogen and methanol (37, 39, 45). Thermophilic members in the family Methanobacteriaceae are assigned to the genus Methanothermobacter, which currently possesses three species (59). Methanothermobacter is the only genus of rod-shaped methanogens that grow on H2-CO2 at an optimum temperature of 60 to 65°C (3). Strain Tm2T has similar characteristics, but in contrast to the type strains of the genus Methanothermobacter, Tm2T requires acetate for growth (Table 1). In addition, the genomic DNA G+C content of strain Tm2T was much lower than that of other members of the genus Methanothermobacter (Table 1). 16S rRNA gene analysis indicated that Tm2T is related to the genus Methanothermobacter but shows a similarity of only 95.7 to 96.4% (Fig. 4), indicating that Tm2T could not be assigned to the known species in the genus (14). Interestingly, the inferred amino acid sequence of the partial sequence of the mcrA gene from strain Tm2T was most similar to that of the type strains of genus Methanobacterium (90%) but only distantly related to that of the species of the genus Methanothermobacter or Methanobacterium.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain Tm2T and related type species of the family Methanobacteriaceae using the neighbor-joining method by the MEGA 4.0 software based on 1,125 unambiguous bases and 1,000 bootstrap replications. The sequence of Methermicoccus shengliensis ZC-1T (DQ787474) was used as the outgroup. Scale bar, 2% estimated difference in nucleotide sequence.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Phylogenetic tree of inferred amino acid sequences (159 amino acids) of the partial mcrA gene sequence of strain Tm2T and related type strains in the family Methanobacteriaceae. The tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining method in the MEGA 4.0 software with 1,000 bootstrap replications. The sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmaniae DSM 3091T (AJ584650) was used as the outgroup. Bar, 5% estimated difference in amino acid sequence.

Table 1.

Characteristics of strain Tm2T and type strains of genus Methanothermobacter

Strain Cell width × length (μm) Filaments Gram staining Use of H2-CO2 as catabolic substrate Formate utilization Chemoautotrophy Acetate requirement Growth-stimulating compound(s)a pH range (optimum) Temp (oC) range (optimum) % Salinity (optimum) Mol% G+C content (measurement method) Source Reference(s)
Tm2T 0.3 × 2.2-5.9 + + + 6.9-8.0 (6.9) 45-80 (65) 0-4 (0.5) 40.1 ± 1.3 (Tm), 41.1 (HPLC) Oil sands This study
M. defluvii ADZT 0.42 × 3-6 + + + + HS-coM, Ni2+, YE, Casamino Acids, sewage sludge 5.5-8.5 (6.5-7) 45-65 (60-65) 0-3 (0.08-2) 62.2 (Tm) Anaerobic sludge 22
M. thermoflexus IDZT 0.4 × 7-20 + + + + HS-coM, Ni2+ 6.0-9 (7.9-8.2) 45-70 (55) 0-5 (0.1-3) 55 (Tm) Anaerobic sludge 22
M. thermophilus MT 0.36 × 1.4-6.5 + + + HS-coM 7.0-8.5 (7.5) 45-65 (57) 44.7 (Tm) Thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digester 4, 58
M. thermautotrophicus ΔHT 0.35-0.6 × 3-7 + + + + 6-8 (7.2-7.6) 40-75 (65-70) 52 (Tm) Sewage sludge 64
M. marburgensis MarburgT 0.4-0.6 × 3-6 + + + + 5.0-8.0 (6.8-7.4) 45-70 (65) 47.6 (Tm) Sewage sludge digester 4, 58
M. wolfeii VKM B-1829T 0.35-0.4 × 2.4-2.7 + + ND 6.0-8.2 (7.0-7.5) 37-76 (55-65) 0-2 (1) 61 ± 1 (Tm) Mixture of sewage sludge and river sediment 62
a

HS-coM, coenzyme M; ND, not determined.

According to the minimal standards for describing new taxa of methanogens (2) and based on physiological and phylogenetic characteristics, we propose that strains Tm2T and HMD represent a novel species of the genus Methanothermobacter and propose the name Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov.

Ecological niche of the M. crinale-related phylotype in oil fields.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences with 98% (or greater) similarity to that of Tm2T in published papers were thought to be members of the species M. crinale (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). A number of as-yet-uncultivated M. crinale-related phylotypes have been described in geographically distant high-temperature oil reservoirs such as oil fields on the north slope of Alaska (11, 15), the Yabase oil field in Japan (33), the Dagang oil field (40) and the Qinghuang unit in the People's Republic of China (26), high-temperature natural gas fields (38), and oil-polluted saline soil (63) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). More interestingly, the occurrence of the M. crinale-related phylotype was found to be concomitant with syntrophic acetate oxidation. Using isotopic and molecular biological approaches, Mayumi et al. (33). demonstrated that syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis occurred in a high-temperature petroleum reservoir. The Thermacetogenium-related bacteria were responsible for syntrophic acetate oxidation, and prominent archaeal clone sequences (type clones YAB2A11 [AB539931] and YAB3A23 [AB539929]) were closely affiliated with that of M. crinale strain Tm2T (99.2% and 98.8% sequence similarity, respectively). Five thermodynamically possible pathways for the conversion of hydrocarbons into methane have been proposed (10), and the incomplete oxidation of hydrocarbons, coupled with syntrophic acetate oxidation and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, is thought to be a key process in oil reservoirs (20). Gieg et al. (15). cultivated a thermophilic crude-oil-degrading methanogenic consortium from the production water of oil reservoirs and deduced that the predominant M. crinale-related phylotype (99.8% sequence similarity; GU357468) was likely to be involved in the syntrophic decomposition of crude oil. Nazina et al. (40) found that a Methanobacteriales-related consortium obtained from the Dagang oil field utilized 14CH3-COONa and NaH14CO3 to produce methane and suggested the presence of syntrophic acetate degradation via hydrogenotrophic methanogens. In that study, 45 clone sequences (type clone A1m_OTU3 [DQ097668]) out of 101 methanogenic archaeal clones belonged to the M. crinale phylotype (99.9% sequence similarity). In addition, this phylotype has also been detected in various thermophilic anaerobic reactors treating glucose (55) and mixtures of acetate, propionate, and sucrose (50), propionate and/or acetate (56), acetate and butyrate (57), and swine manure, sewage sludge, and a hot-rot compost suspension (23).

We found that methane production in the enrichment (before the isolation of Tm2T) corresponded to acetate degradation at 55°C, while the aceticlastic methanogens were absent. Though without direct evidence, it was very likely that syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis occurred in this enrichment.

Description of Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov.

Methanothermobacter crinale (cri.na′le. L. neut. n. crinale), a hairpin, referring to a special morphological feature of the genus Methanothermobacter, i.e., that some coccoid-shaped cells are attached to the end of the rod-shaped methanogen.

Cells occur singly or in pairs as straight or slightly curved rods (0.3 μm in width and 2.2 to 5.9 μm in length) but occasionally connected to coccoid-shaped cells at the ends. The cells are not motile, are not lysed in 1% SDS (wt/vol), and stain Gram positively. Methane is produced from H2-CO2, and acetate is a required growth factor. Good growth occurs at a pH of 6.9 (range, 6.6 to 8.9), a temperature of 65°C (range, 45 to 85°C), and an NaCl concentration of 0.025 g/liter (range, 0.025 to 40 g/liter). The genomic DNA G+C content is 40.1 ± 1.3 or 41.1 mol%, based on the Tm or HPLC method, respectively.

The type strain of Tm2T (ACCC 00699T = JCM 17393T) was isolated from oil sands in the Haoxian central facility of in the Shengli oil field of the People's Republic of China.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Xiaoxia Zhang for assistance in determining GC mol% contents, Zhe Lv for supplying antibiotics, and Qiang Li and Sichun Ma for the analysis of VFA. We appreciate William B. Whitman for helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript and the taxonomy of Tm2. We also thank Jean Euzeby for the etymology of the novel taxon.

This study was supported partly by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 3090049, 40625003, and 4097059) and the Chang Jiang Scholars Program of the Chinese Ministry of Education.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

Published ahead of print on 24 June 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Altschul S., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E., Lipman D. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Boone D. R., Whitman W. B. 1988. Proposal of minimal standards for describing new taxa of methanogenic bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38:212–219 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Boone D. R., Whitman W. B., Koga Y. 2001. Family I. Methanobacteriaceae Barker 1956, 15AL, emend. Balch and Wolfe in Balch, Fox, Magrum, Woese and Wolfe 1979, 267, p. 214–233 In Boone D. R., Castenholz R. W., Garrity and G. M. (ed.) Bergery's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Boone D. R. 2001. Genus IV. Methanothermobacter Wasserfallen, Nölling, Pfister, Reeve and Conway de Macario 2000, 51VP, p. 230–233 In Boone D. R., Castenholz R. W., Garrity G. M. (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed., vol. 1 Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cheng L., Qiu T.-L., Li X., Wang W.-D., Yin X., Deng Y., Zhang H. 2008. Isolation and characterization of Methanoculleus receptaculi sp. nov. from Shengli oil field, P. R. China. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 285:65–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cheng L., et al. 2007. Methermicoccus shengliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic, methylotrophic methanogen isolated from oil production water, and proposal of Methermicoccaceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:2964–2969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cole J. R., et al. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:141–145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. DeLong E. F. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:5685–5689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. DeSantis T. Z., et al. 2006. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5069–5072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dolfing J., Larter S. R., Head I. M. 2008. Thermodynamic constraints on methanogenic crude oil biodegradation. ISME J. 2:442–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Duncan K. E., et al. 2009. Biocorrosive thermophilic microbial communities in Alaskan North Slope oil facilities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:7977–7984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.572 c). Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Friedrich W., Antje B., Ralf R. 2006. Anaerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons including methane, p. 1028–1049 In Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifer K.-H., Stackebrandt E. (ed.), The prokaryotes: ecophysiology and biochemistry, vol. 2. Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Garrity G. M., Holt J. G. 2001. Phylum All. Euryarchaeota phy. nov., p. 211–294 In Boone D. R., Castenholz R. W., Garrity G. M. (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed., vol. 1 Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gieg L. M., Davidova I. A., Duncan K. E., Suflita J. M. 2010. Methanogenesis, sulfate reduction and crude oil biodegradation in hot Alaskan oilfields. Environ. Microbiol. 12:3074–3086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hao L.-P., Lü F., He P.-J., Li L., Shao L.-M. 2011. Predominant contribution of syntrophic acetate oxidation to thermophilic methane formation at high acetate concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:508–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hattori S., Kamagata Y., Hanada S., Shoun H. 2000. Thermacetogenium phaeum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic, thermophilic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1601–1609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hungate R. E. 1969. A roll-tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Methods Microbiol. 3B:117–132 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jarrell K. F., Faguy D., Hebert A. M., Kalmokoff M. L. 1992. A general method of isolating high molecular weight DNA from methanogenic archaea (archaebacteria). Can. J. Microbiol. 38:65–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Jones D. M., et al. 2008. Crude-oil biodegradation via methanogenesis in subsurface petroleum reservoirs. Nature 451:176–180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Karakashev D., Batstone D. J., Trably E., Angelidaki I. 2006. Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5138–5141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kotelnikova S. V., Obraztsova A. Y., Gongadze G. M., Laurinavichius K. S. 1993. Methanobacterium thermoflexum sp. nov. and Methanobacterium defluvii sp. nov.: thermophilic rod-shaped methanogens isolated from anaerobic digestor sludge. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 16:427–435 [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Krakat N., Westphal A., Schmidt S., Scherer P. 2010. Anaerobic digestion of renewable biomass: thermophilic temperature governs methanogen population dynamics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:1842–1850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Larkin M. A., et al. 2007. ClustalW and ClustalX version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lee M. J., Zinder S. H. 1988. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic bacterium which oxidizes acetate in syntrophic association with a methanogen and which grows acetogenically on H2-CO2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:124–129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Li H., Yang S.-Z., Mu B.-Z., Rong Z.-F., Zhang J. 2007. Molecular phylogenetic diversity of the microbial community associated with a high-temperature petroleum reservoir at an offshore oilfield. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 60:74–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Liu F., Conrad R. 2010. Thermoanaerobacteriaceae oxidize acetate in methanogenic rice field soil at 50°C. Environ. Microbiol. 12:2341–2354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu Y., Whitman W. B. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125:171–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lueders T., Friedrich M. W. 2003. Evaluation of PCR amplification bias by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of small-subunit rRNA and mcrA genes by using defined template mixtures of methanogenic pure cultures and soil DNA extracts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:320–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ma K., Liu X., Dong X. 2005. Methanobacterium beijingense sp. nov., a novel methanogen isolated from anaerobic digesters. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:325–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Macy J., Snellen J., Hungate R. 1972. Use of syringe methods for anaerobiosis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25:1318–1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Marmur J., Doty P. 1962. Determination of the base composition of DNA from its thermal denaturation temperature. J. Mol. Biol. 5:109–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mayumi D., et al. 23 September 2010, posting date. Evidence for syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in the high-temperature petroleum reservoir of Yabase oil field (Japan). Environ. Microbiol. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02338.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P., Hespell R. B., Costerton J. W. 1981. Syntrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic, fatty acid-oxidizing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:1029–1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mesbah M., Premachandran U., Whitman W. B. 1989. Precise measurement of the G+C content of DNA by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:159–167 [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Mikucki J. A., Liu Y., Delwiche M., Colwell F. S., Boone D. R. 2003. Isolation of a methanogen from deep marine sediments that contain methane hydrates, and description of Methanoculleus submarinus sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3311–3316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. 1985. Methanosphaera stadtmaniae gen. nov., sp. nov.: a species that forms methane by reducing methanol with hydrogen. Arch. Microbiol. 141:116–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mochimaru H., et al. 2007. Microbial diversity and methanogenic potential in a high temperature natural gas field in Japan. Extremophiles 11:453–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mori K., Harayama S. 2010. Methanobacterium petrolearium sp. nov. and Methanobacterium ferruginis sp. nov., novel mesophilic methanogens isolated from salty environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61:138–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nazina T. N., et al. 2006. Phylogenetic diversity and activity of anaerobic microorganisms of high-temperature horizons of the Dagang oil field (P. R. China). Microbiology 75:55–65 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Nüsslein B., Chin K. J., Eckert W., Conrad R. 2001. Evidence for anaerobic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane production in the profundal sediment of subtropical Lake Kinneret (Israel). Environ. Microbiol. 3:460–470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Peng J., Lü Z., Rui J., Lu Y. 2008. Dynamics of the methanogenic archaeal community during plant residue decomposition in an anoxic rice field soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2894–2901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Petersen S., Ahring B. K. 1991. Acetate oxidation in a thermophilic anaerobic sewage-sludge digestor: the importance of non-aceticlastic methanogenesis from acetate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 86:149–158 [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Powell G. E. 1983. Interpreting gas kinetics of batch cultures. Biotechnol. Lett. 5:437–440 [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Rea S., Bowman J. P., Popovski S., Pimm C., Wright A.-D. G. 2007. Methanobrevibacter millerae sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter olleyae sp. nov., methanogens from the ovine and bovine rumen that can utilize formate for growth. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:450–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rui J., Peng J., Lu Y. 2009. Succession of bacterial populations during plant residue decomposition in rice field soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4879–4886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Schloss P. D., Handelsman J. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1501–1506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Schnürer A., Schink B., Svensson B. H. 1996. Clostridium ultunense sp. nov., a mesophilic bacterium oxidizing acetate in syntrophic association with a hydrogenotrophic methanogenic bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:1145–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Schnürer A., Zellner G., Svensson B. H. 1999. Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29:249–261 [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sekiguchi Y., et al. 1998. Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. Microbiology 144:2655–2665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shlimon A. G., Friedrich M. W., Niemann H., Ramsing N. B., Finster K. 2004. Methanobacterium aarhusense sp. nov., a novel methanogen isolated from a marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:759–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. So C. M., Young L. Y. 1999. Isolation and characterization of a sulfate-reducing bacterium that anaerobically degrades alkanes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2969–2976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Springer E., Sachs M. S., Woese C. R., Boone D. R. 1995. Partial gene sequences for the A subunit of methyl-coenzyme M reductase (mcrI) as a phylogenetic tool for the family Methanosarcinaceae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:554–559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1596–1599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Tang Y.-Q., Matsui T., Morimura S., Wu X.-L., Kida K. 2008. Effect of temperature on microbial community of a glucose-degrading methanogenic consortium under hyperthermophilic chemostat cultivation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 106:180–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Tatara M., Makiuchi T., Ueno Y., Goto M., Sode K. 2008. Methanogenesis from acetate and propionate by thermophilic down-flow anaerobic packed-bed reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 99:4786–4795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ueno Y., Tatara M. 2008. Microbial population in a thermophilic packed-bed reactor for methanogenesis from volatile fatty acids. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 43:302–308 [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wagner I. D., Wiegel J. 2008. Diversity of thermophilic anaerobes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125:1–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Wasserfallen A., Nolling J., Pfister P., Reeve J., Conway de Macario E. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of 18 thermophilic Methanobacterium isolates supports the proposals to create a new genus, Methanothermobacter gen. nov., and to reclassify several isolates in three species, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus comb. nov., Methanothermobacter wolfeii comb. nov., and Methanothermobacter marburgensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:43–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Westerholm M., Roos S., Schnürer A. 2010. Syntrophaceticus schinkii gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a mesophilic anaerobic filter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 309:100–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Widdel F., Pfennig N. 1981. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobaeter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 129:395–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Winter J., et al. 1984. Methanobacterium wolfei, sp. nov., a new tungsten-requiring, thermophilic, autotrophic methanogen. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 5:457–466 [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wu X.-L., Friedrich M. W., Conrad R. 2006. Diversity and ubiquity of thermophilic methanogenic archaea in temperate anoxic soils. Environ. Microbiol. 8:394–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zeikus J. G., Wolee R. S. 1972. Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicus sp. n., an anaerobic, autotrophic, extreme thermophile. J. Bacteriol. 109:707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Zinder S. H., Koch M. 1984. Non-aceticlastic methanogenesis from acetate: acetate oxidation by a thermophilic syntrophic coculture. Arch. Microbiol. 138:263–272 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]
supp_77_15_5212__1.pdf (71.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES