Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 Aug;193(15):4015–4016. doi: 10.1128/JB.05282-11

Genome Sequence of the Vertebrate Gut Symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 53608

Darren Heavens 1,, Louise E Tailford 2,, Lisa Crossman 1,, Faye Jeffers 2, Donald A MacKenzie 2, Mario Caccamo 1, Nathalie Juge 2,*
PMCID: PMC3147506  PMID: 21622738

Abstract

Lactobacillus reuteri, inhabiting the gastrointestinal tracts of a range of vertebrates, is a true symbiont with effects established as beneficial to the host. Here we describe the draft genome of L. reuteri ATCC 53608, isolated from a pig. The genome sequence provides important insights into the evolutionary changes underlying host specialization.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The Gram-positive bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri is an excellent model organism to study the evolutionary strategy of a vertebrate gut symbiont, as this species inhabits the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals as diverse as humans, pigs, mice, and rats, as well as different species of birds (11). Population genetics, using amplified fragment length polymorphism and multilocus sequence analysis; genomic; and experimental approaches using lactobacillus-free and germfree mouse models revealed that host-specific subpopulations exist among members of the species L. reuteri (9). Furthermore, several trials have shown that L. reuteri confers health benefits on humans and animals, and strains of this species have been shown to modulate the host immune system (11). Efforts to understand the mechanism by which L. reuteri strains have remained restricted to particular hosts are ongoing (5).

To further investigate the genomic basis for host adaptation of L. reuteri to the gut, we have determined the genome sequence of the pig isolate L. reuteri ATCC 53608 (8). Genomic DNA was isolated using a modified form of the method of Oh and colleagues (9) and used to generate in excess of 365 Mbp of sequence from a combination of shotgun and 3-kbp paired-end libraries (220 Mbp and 145 Mbp, respectively) on the 454 GS FLX sequencer (Roche) using the Titanium Chemistry. Reads passing the default filter settings were assembled using gsAssembly V2.3 software (Roche) and generated 13 scaffolds containing 99 large contigs (>500 bp) and spanning 1.96 Mbp of sequence. The genome of L. reuteri ATCC 53608 is 1,969,869 bp in length and has an average G+C content of 38.4%. Automatic gene prediction was performed using Glimmer3 and GeneMark software (2, 3). Annotation was transferred from the related strain L. reuteri JCM 1112T. Unique regions were manually annotated using Artemis (10), augmented with InterPro (6), TMHMM (transmembrane prediction using hidden Markov models) (7), and SignalP domains (4). A total of 2,024 protein-coding sequences were predicted, with a coding percentage of 88.7%. The coding density was 1.03 genes per kb, with an average gene length of 863 bp. The genome contains six predicted copies of the rRNA genes. Comparative genomics of ATCC 53608 with genome sequence available for the L. reuteri 100-23 and DSM 20016T/JCM 1112T strains isolated from rats and humans (5), respectively, revealed approximately 500 ATCC 53608-specific genes, whereas 1,335 genes are present in all four strains. Genome analysis also revealed the presence of a putative prophage or plasmid of 137,391 bp with flanking resolvase/integrase and transposase genes. ATCC 53608 lacks the 10.2-kb native plasmid pLUL631 described in original isolate 1063 (1) but harbors one small plasmid of 9,003 bp. Detailed analysis of the assembled ATCC 53608 genome will help to predict the competitiveness of L. reuteri strains in vivo and to provide a context for the rational selection of probiotic strains.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This genome sequencing project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number CACS00000000. The version described in this paper is CACS02000000. The 138 contigs contained in the genome have been deposited under accession numbers CACS02000001 to CACS02000138. The 13 fully annotated scaffolds built from the contigs have been deposited under accession numbers FR854361 to FR854373.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

We thank Robert Davey (The Genome Analysis Centre) for his help with the submission of the genome sequence.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 27 May 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ahrné S., Molin G., Axelsson L. 1992. Transformation of Lactobacillus reuteri with electroporation: studies on the erythromycin resistance plasmid pLUL631. Curr. Microbiol. 24:199–205 [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Besemer J., Lomsadze A., Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2607–2618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Delcher A. L., Bratke K. A., Powers E. C., Salzberg S. L. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Emanuelsson O., Brunak S., von Heijne G., Nielsen H. 2007. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat. Protoc. 2:953–971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frese S. A., et al. 2011. The evolution of host specialization in the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hunter S., et al. 2009. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D211–D215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. L. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305:567–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. MacKenzie D. A., et al. 2010. Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbiology 156:3368–3378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Oh P. L., et al. 2010. Diversification of the gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri as a result of host-driven evolution. ISME J. 4:377–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rutherford K., et al. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Walter J., Britton R. A., Roos S. 2011. Microbes and Health Sackler Colloquium: host-microbial symbiosis in the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract and the Lactobacillus reuteri paradigm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:4645–5462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES