Abstract
We present a family of homonuclear 13C-13C magic angle spinning spin diffusion experiments, based on R2nv (n = 1 and 2, v = 1 and 2) symmetry sequences. These experiments are well suited for 13C-13C correlation spectroscopy in biological and organic systems, and are especially advantageous at very fast MAS conditions, where conventional PDSD and DARR experiments fail. At very fast MAS frequencies the R211, R221, and R222 sequences result in excellent quality correlation spectra both in model compounds and in proteins. Under these conditions, individual R2nv display different polarization transfer efficiency-dependencies on isotropic chemical shift differences: R221 recouples efficiently both small and large chemical shift differences (in proteins these correspond to aliphatic-to-aliphatic and carbonyl-to-aliphatic correlations, respectively), while R211 and R222 exhibit the maximum recoupling efficiency for the aliphatic-to-aliphatic or carbonyl-to-aliphatic correlations, respectively. At moderate MAS frequencies (10–20 kHz), all R2nv sequences introduced in this work display similar transfer efficiencies, and their performance is very similar to that of PDSD and DARR. Polarization transfer dynamics and chemical shift dependencies of these R2-driven spin diffusion (RDSD) schemes are experimentally evaluated and investigated by numerical simulations for [U-13C,15N]-alanine and the [U-13C,15N] N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (MLF) tripeptide. Further applications of this approach are illustrated for several proteins: spherical assemblies of HIV-1 U-13C,15N CA protein, U-13C,15N enriched dynein light chain DLC8, and sparsely 13C/uniformly 15N enriched CAP-Gly domain of dynactin. Due to the excellent performance and ease of implementation, the presented R2nv symmetry sequences are expected to be of wide applicability in studies of proteins and protein assemblies as well as other organic solids by MAS NMR spectroscopy.
Keywords: solid-state NMR, magic angle spinning, MAS, very fast MAS, spin diffusion, R-symmetry, HIV-1, AIDS, CA, capsid protein, dynein light chain DLC8, CAP-Gly, protein assemblies
Introduction
With the recent developments in decoupling and recoupling techniques, solid-state NMR has become a powerful tool for determining molecular structure and dynamics in biological solids, ranging from amyloid fibrils to membrane proteins to intact viruses to protein assemblies.1–10 Magic angle spinning (MAS) recoupling methods, both dipolar- and scalar-based, have emerged as an essential tool for structural and dynamics characterization of uniformly and extensively enriched biopolymers.11–24 With the recent breakthroughs in probe technology, very fast MAS frequencies of the order of 40–70 kHz are now accessible to the experimentalist,25–27 and these fast MAS conditions result in greatly enhanced spectral resolution due to efficient averaging of the homonuclear 1H-1H dipolar interactions at spinning rates above 30 kHz, and due to efficient heteronuclear 1H-X decoupling that can be achieved at high rotation frequencies. The narrow 1H lines under very fast MAS also permit proton detection, and indeed, several investigators have recently demonstrated the benefits of proton-detected experiments in proteins, both in terms of greatly enhanced sensitivity and the additional information that can be gained by incorporating the proton dimension into the spectra.28–31 In the heteronucleus-detected experiments, the narrow lines attained at very fast MAS frequencies also give rise to significant sensitivity enhancements, and therefore, very fast MAS conditions are in principle advantageous across the board for structural and dynamics studies of proteins and protein assemblies. However, implementation of fast-MAS protocols for protein structure determination requires the development of modified homo- and heteronuclear recoupling methods,26,32–36 because many of the recoupling techniques that are commonly employed at MAS frequencies below 20 kHz do not work above 30 kHz.
Types of experiments that do not work in their original implementation under very fast MAS conditions comprise homonuclear spin-diffusion-based recoupling methods, such as proton-driven spin diffusion (PDSD)37,38 and dipolar-assisted rotational resonance (DARR)20,39 or RF-assisted diffusion (RAD).40 These techniques are ubiquitously used in structural analysis of proteins and protein assemblies at moderate MAS frequencies (10–20 kHz), both for resonance assignments and for deriving long-range distance constraints as well as for quantitative CP/MAS measurements.1,6,7,11,12,22,23,41–57 These sequences are some of the very few homonuclear recoupling methods (along with PAR34,58,59 and CHHC60,61) that do not suffer from dipolar truncation36,44,62–64 and are thus particularly advantageous for extracting distance information in uniformly and extensively enriched proteins.
In PDSD experiments, the recoupling efficiency depends strongly on the line broadening due to the residual 1H-X dipolar couplings and on the spinning frequency, and in some cases it is hard to achieve broadband homonuclear correlation spectra. This limitation is alleviated when a weak radio frequency (rf) field irradiation is applied on the protons during the mixing time, such as in DARR (RAD) experiments. For DARR (RAD) irradiation, the 1H rf field strength is ω1H=nωr, satisfying the rotary resonance matching condition and resulting in broadband rotational resonance recoupling. During the mixing time, 13C-13C polarization transfer is driven by the reintroduced 1H-13C and 1H-1H dipolar couplings, and the transfer efficiency for the coupled 13C spins is somewhat less dependent on MAS frequency than in the conventional PDSD experiment. While dependence of polarization transfer efficiency on the MAS frequency in DARR (RAD) experiments is not as dramatic as in the PDSD sequence, the dependence on the chemical shift difference between the coupled spins is very strong.65 This chemical shift difference dependence is particularly severe at very fast MAS rates (>30 kHz), resulting in lower and non-uniform polarization transfer efficiencies across the spectrum, and at frequencies of 40 kHz or above DARR/RAD would not be a method of choice for 13C correlation spectroscopy.
Recently, several amplitude- and phase-modulated DARR/RAD experiments were developed to improve the spin diffusion efficiency under very fast MAS conditions.36,65,66 Second-order rotational resonance conditions, ω1 = nωr ± Δωiso, were introduced by Ernst et al.36 Broadband homonuclear dipolar recoupling at very fast MAS frequencies can be performed by various amplitude-modulated 1H rf field irradiation schemes, referred to as mixed rotational and rotary-resonance (MIRROR) technique. Tekely et al. proposed a phase-alternated recoupling irradiation (PARIS)66,67 scheme to obtain more efficient polarization transfer at very fast MAS, and the phase alternated DARR irradiation compensates efficiently for rf field inhomogeneity and improves the magnetization transfer rate. Nevertheless, the chemical shift offset sensitivity still remains an issue in these sequences, and it is difficult to achieve uniform broadband polarization transfer.
In this work, we present a family of spin diffusion experiments in which the magnetization transfer is driven by rotor-synchronized R2nv symmetry-based recoupling. Such symmetry-based approaches in MAS recoupling pulse sequences were originally described by Levitt in a series of elegant studies that established the general design principles for these sequences as well as classified them as CNnv and RNnv schemes depending on the rotation properties of the spin angular momenta during the rotor-synchronized train of rf pulses.68–71 RNnv -type sequences, employed in this work, are designed to produce a net rotation of the spin angular momenta by π around the x axis of the rotating frame.68 Following the Levitt nomenclature, n and v are small integers and are referred to as the symmetry numbers of the pulse sequence. In the R2nv symmetry-based spin diffusion experiments introduced here, all pairwise combinations of n = 1, 2 and v = 1, 2 are employed to produce four sequences, R211, R212, R221, and R222. The pulse element of the R2 symmetry sequences can be either a basic π pulse or composite pulses such as 90°x90°·y90°x, 90°x270°-x or 90°x180°y90°x. In these R2 sequences, the rf field amplitude and phase alternation are defined according to the R-type symmetry. It should be noted that the basic R211 symmetry scheme has the same pulse type as the rotor synchronized PARIS66 scheme, and that the basic R212 symmetry scheme has the same pulse type as the conventional DARR/RAD scheme. We demonstrate that these different R2-driven spin diffusion schemes (RDSD) exhibit similar transfer efficiencies at moderate MAS rates (<20 kHz) except that R211 and POST-R221 are advantageous for the recoupling of coupled spins with small chemical shift differences. At very fast MAS frequencies, the individual R2 irradiation schemes display distinct dependencies of the polarization transfer efficiencies on the chemical shift differences between coupled carbon spins. Experiments and numerical simulations in [U-13C,15N]-alanine and [U-13C,15N] N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (MLF) tripeptide indicate that under very fast MAS the polarization transfer in these R2nv spin diffusion experiments is driven by the broadened second-order rotational resonance condition (ω1 ± nωr - KscωDD ≤ Δωiso ≤ ω1 ± nωr + KscωDD), and we present the theoretical treatment of these sequences that correctly accounts for the polarization transfer dynamics and for the observed chemical shift dependence of the individual R2nv schemes. Our results further indicate that due to these distinct chemical shift dependencies it is advantageous to employ a specific R2 sequence for a given correlation experiment, e.g., CACB vs. CACO.
We further demonstrate that these R2nv spin diffusion sequences perform very efficiently in proteins and protein assemblies, using three examples: spherical assemblies of U-13C,15N-enriched HIV-1 CA protein, U-13C,15N-enriched dynein light chain DLC8, and sparsely-13C/U-15N-labeled dynactin CAP-Gly domain. We anticipate that the approach presented here for R2nv spin diffusion under fast-MAS conditions will be broadly applicable to studies of proteins and protein assemblies by MAS NMR spectroscopy, which is a rapidly growing area of research.
Experiments and Methods
Samples
[U-13C,15N]-alanine and [U-13C,15N] N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (MLF) tripeptide were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Both powder samples were used in the subsequent NMR experiments without any further purification or recrystallization. The sample of spherical assemblies of U-13C,15N-enriched HIV-1 capsid protein (CA) was prepared according to established procedures.6 CAP-Gly sparsely enriched in 13C and uniformly labeled with 15N was prepared from E. coli, grown in minimal medium containing 1,3-13C glycerol (Cambridge Isotopes) as the sole carbon source and 15NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source, as described previously.72–74 The solid-state NMR sample of CAP-Gly was prepared by controlled precipitation from polyethylene glycol,36,44,62,63 slowly adding a solution of 30% PEG-3350 to the solution of 24.3 mg of CAP-Gly (38.5 mg/mL), both dissolved in 10 mM MES buffer (10 mM MgCl2, pH 6.0), as described previously.7 U-13C, 15N-enriched dynein light chain protein (DLC8) was expressed in E.coli and purified as described previously.75 The solid-state NMR sample of DLC8 was prepared by controlled precipitation, slowly adding a solution of 30% PEG-3350 to the solution of 11 mg of DLC8 (30 mg/ml). Prior to the precipitation step, both PEG-3350 and DLC8 were dissolved in 10 mM MES buffer (10 mM MgCl2, pH 6.0) and doped with 50 mM EDTA-Cu(II). The protein samples were packed in 1.8 mm MAS rotors for solid-state NMR experiments.
Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
All NMR experiments were carried out on a Varian InfinityPlus solid-state NMR spectrometer operating at a Larmor frequency of 599.8 MHz for 1H, and 150.8 MHz for 13C. Solid-state NMR experiments were performed using either a 3.2 mm Varian triple-resonance T3 probe (spinning rates of up to 25 kHz) or a 1.8 mm MAS triple-resonance probe developed in the Samoson laboratory (spinning rates up to 50 kHz).
The pulse schemes for RDSD 2D experiments are shown in Figure 1. During the mixing period, a series of R2nv symmetry pulses is applied on the 1H channel, as illustrated in Figure 1(b)–(e) for each specific R2nv experiment. For R21v symmetry irradiation, the rf field strength equals the MAS frequency, and one rotor period contains two π pulses. For R22v symmetry irradiation, the rf field strength equals half the MAS frequency, and one rotor period contains one π pulse. For POST-R2nv symmetry irradiation, the basic π pulse is replaced by a composite pulse, (π/2)0(3π/2)180, and the rf field strength is twice that of the R2nv symmetry irradiation, as shown in Figure 1(f) for POST R221.
Figure 1.
(a) The general pulse sequence for 2D 13C-13C R2nv homonuclear correlation experiments. An RF field irradiation is applied on proton spins during the mixing time. R irradiation represents rotor-synchronized R2-type symmetry pulses: (b) R212 (ωrf = ωr), (c) R211 (ωrf = ωr), (d) R222 (ωrf = ½ ωr), (e) R221 (ωrf = ½ ωr), and (f) POST R221 (ωrf = ωr).
NMR experiments on the MLF sample packed into a 3.2 mm rotor were recorded at room temperature and MAS frequency of 16 kHz. Typical 90°· pulse lengths were 2.8 µs for 1H and 4.0 µs for 13C. The cross-polarization contact time was 1.4 ms, and the recycle delay was 3.0 s. Two-pulse phase-modulation (TPPM)76 1H decoupling with an rf field strength of 96 kHz was performed during the acquisition, and continuous wave (CW) 1H decoupling with the same rf field strength was applied during the t1 evolution time. 1H irradiation with an rf field strength of 16 and 8 kHz during the mixing time was applied for 2D R21v and R22v (v = 1, 2) correlation experiments, respectively. The 2D spectra were collected as (1000 × 256) (complex x real) matrices with 8 scans; TPPI (time proportional phase incrementation) scheme was used for phase-sensitive detection in the indirect dimension.77 A series of experiments with different mixing times ranging between 1 and 50 ms were performed.
NMR experiments on an alanine sample packed into a 1.8 mm rotor were performed at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. To reduce sample heating during fast MAS spinning, nitrogen gas at 0°C was used for cooling, resulting in a final sample temperature of 20°C. The rf field strength on the 1H channel during the mixing time was 40 and 20 kHz for R21v and R22v experiments, respectively. CW 1H decoupling with rf field strength of 9 kHz was employed in the t1 and t2 dimensions. The 2D spectra were collected as (2000 × 512) (complex x real) matrices with 8 scans; TPPI scheme was used for phase-sensitive detection in the indirect dimension. A series of experiments with different mixing times ranging between 5 and 500 ms were performed.
NMR experiments on protein samples packed into a 1.8 mm rotor were performed at the MAS frequencies of 10 and 40 kHz. To reduce the sample heating due to fast MAS spinning at 40 kHz, a stream of cooling nitrogen gas at −20°C, −25 °C and −35°C was used for the HIV-1 CA, CAP-Gly and DLC8 samples, resulting in final sample temperatures of 0°C, −5°C and −15°C, respectively. For all 2D R2nv 13C-13C correlation experiments, TPPI scheme was used for phase-sensitive detection in the indirect t1 dimension. The other parameters were the same as those used for the experiments on alanine. For all RDSD NMR experiments conducted at the MAS frequency of 10 kHz, a 96 kHz 1H TPPM decoupling was applied during t1 and t2. Detailed acquisition and procession parameters are shown in the Supporting Information.
Numerical Simulations
All numerical simulations were performed in SIMPSON.78 168 REPULSION (α, β) angles and 16 γ angles were used to generate a powder average. The atomic coordinates for the model spin systems employed in the simulations were taken from the SSNMR structure of the leucine residue in the N-f-MLF-OH tripeptide (PDB ID 1Q7O).50 These atomic coordinates are generally regarded as a valid representation for spin systems of other amino acids. For Cα-C′ spin diffusion simulations, a spin cluster containing two carbons and one proton was used. For Cα-Cβ spin diffusion simulations, a spin cluster containing two carbons and three protons was employed. The one-bond dipolar coupling constants for 1H-13C and 13C-13C were 22,690 and 2,251 Hz, respectively. In all simulations, all possible pairwise dipolar couplings were taken into account. J couplings were ignored as their effects are negligible given their small size. Other parameters used in simulations were the same as in the corresponding experiments.
Results and Discussion
Symmetry-Based Spin Diffusion Experiments at Moderate MAS Frequencies
R2nv symmetry-based pulse irradiation on protons can be used to reintroduce hetero- and homonuclear dipolar couplings, which in turn allow for spin diffusion among carbon spins. The space-spin selection rules for the symmetry-allowed first-order average Hamiltonian terms have been reported elsewhere.68 Figure 2 demonstrates space-spin selection diagrams for the interaction Hamiltonians in the R211 sequence. It can be seen that both the 1H-13C heteronuclear dipolar couplings and the 1H-1H homonuclear dipolar couplings are reintroduced by the R211 symmetry irradiation, with six heteronuclear dipolar coupling terms HIS(1) and ten homonuclear dipolar coupling terms HII(1) of the first-order average Hamiltonian being symmetry-allowed. Even though spin diffusion between coupled 13C spins is primarily determined by the 13C-13C coupling strength and the first-order rotational resonance conditions (nωr = Δωiso), the reintroduced 1H-13C and 1H-1H dipolar couplings represent an essential contribution, resulting in greatly broadened RR matching conditions. Furthermore, these dipolar couplings also contain the second-order average Hamiltonian terms. Even though the recoupled second-order average Hamiltonian terms are much smaller than the first-order contributions, they can also drive the 1H-13C and 1H-1H cross relaxation and assist the 13C-13C spin diffusion. Table 1 summarizes the number of the first- and second-order average Hamiltonian terms in the R2nv symmetry sequences. These recoupled hetero- and homo-nuclear dipolar Hamiltonian terms would drive the polarization transfer (see the Supporting Information for details on the recoupled terms for each R2nv sequence). The first-order rotational resonance conditions would be broadened greatly by R2nv re-introduced dipolar interactions, and these can be expressed as, nωr - KscωDD ≤ Δωiso ≤ ± nωr + KscωDD, where KscωDD denotes the size of the recoupled dipolar interactions by R2nv and Ksc is the corresponding scaling factor.
Figure 2.
Space-spin selection diagrams for the first-order average dipolar Hamiltonian in the R211 symmetry sequence for recoupling of I-S heteronuclear terms (a) and I-I homonuclear terms (b).
Table 1.
The total number of symmetry-allowed first- and second-order average Hamiltonian terms in the R2nv (n, v = 1 and 2) symmetry sequences.
| Symmetry sequences |
Number of symmetry-allowed terms |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R212 | 6 | 10 | 96 | 208 | |||
| R211 | 6 | 10 | 96 | 208 | |||
| R222 | 0 | 20 | 96 | 208 | |||
| R221 | 8 | 12 | 96 | 208 | |||
It is obvious from Table 1 that the number of the symmetry-allowed Hamiltonian terms is different for each recoupling sequence, except for R212 and R211. Even though for R212 and R211 the same number of first- and second-order Hamiltonian terms are symmetry-allowed, the nature of these recoupled Hamiltonian terms {l, m, λ, μ} as well as the corresponding scaling factors are totally different (see the Supporting Information), suggesting that different polarization transfer dynamics might be observed in the corresponding spin diffusion experiments. To examine the 13C-13C transfer rates in each specific sequence at moderate MAS frequencies, we have recorded a series of two-dimensional R2nv (n, v = 1 and 2) correlation spectra with varying mixing times in the MLF tripeptide. The 13C-13C polarization transfer build-up curves acquired at the MAS frequency of 16 kHz are illustrated in Figure 3a for the Cα-Cβ correlation of Leu residue, and in Figure 3b for the Cα-C′ correlation of Met residue.
Figure 3.
Polarization transfer in the 2D R2nv-driven (n, v = 1 and 2) spin diffusion experiments as a function of the mixing time for (a) Cα-Cβ of Leu residue and (b) Cα-C′ of Met residue in [U-13C,15N] N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (MLF) tripeptide. The sample was spun at a MAS frequency of 16 kHz. The cross-peak intensities in each spectrum were normalized to those of the corresponding diagonal peaks in the following way: , where Inorm is the normalized cross peak intensity, IAB is the non-normalized cross peak intensity, IAAand IBB are the non-normalized intensities of the corresponding diagonal peaks. The build-up curves corresponding to the different recoupling sequences are color coded as follows: R211, black; R212, blue; R221, red; R222, green; and POST-R221, purple.
The results demonstrate that, despite the different number of symmetry-allowed Hamiltonian terms in each of the R2nv symmetry-based schemes, all of these sequences exhibit similar polarization transfer efficiencies and polarization transfer rates for Cα-Cβ correlations at moderate spinning frequencies. On the other hand, for the Cα-C′ correlation, the R211 scheme shows a slightly higher polarization transfer rate than the other sequences. We also note that, as expected, the POST versions of sequences in which the basic π-pulse of the R-element is replaced with composite (900270180) pulses, display improved transfer efficiency in the 13C-13C correlation experiments, especially for coupled 13C spins with large chemical shift differences.
Symmetry-Based Spin Diffusion Experiments at Very Fast MAS Frequencies: Alanine
Either proton-driven or dipolar-assisted spin diffusion can be used to perform broadband homonuclear correlation experiments, but both of these recoupling methods display low tolerance to large resonance frequency offsets, which are most pronounced at fast and very fast MAS rates (>30 kHz). Since we found that at moderate MAS frequencies the performance of the R2nv symmetry-driven sequences is largely independent of the chemical shift offset between the coupled spins, we have proceeded with examining the spin diffusion behavior of these sequences at very fast MAS frequencies. Two idealized models of dipolar-coupled spin networks were constructed that represent the smallest coupled C-C spin systems in proteins, using the atomic coordinates of the leucine residue in N-f-MLF-OH, as shown in Figure 4. We used these models in the numerical simulations, to evaluate the 13Cα-13Cβ and 13Cα-13C′ polarization transfer dynamics.
Figure 4.
Spin models for numerical simulations of the polarization transfer dynamics in the R2nv symmetry-driven sequences. (a) Cα-Cβ spin system (three protons and two carbons), (b) Cα-C′ spin system (one proton and two carbons). The atomic coordinates were obtained from the SSNMR structure of MLF50. The interatomic distances are indicated in the figure. The oxygen atom was not taken into account in the simulations.
Figure 5 demonstrates the 13C-13C polarization transfer dynamics by basic (solid curves) and POST (dotted or dashed curves) R2nv symmetry sequences simulated for the above model spin systems at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. The build-up curves for the Cα-Cβ and Cα-C′ correlations are shown in Figure 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. As can be appreciated, under the very fast MAS conditions, the various R2nv symmetry driven schemes exhibit very different polarization transfer dynamics, depending greatly on the chemical shift difference between the coupled 13C spins. For the Cα-C′ polarization transfer by the basic R2nv, the R222 sequence with an rf field irradiation of 20 kHz exhibits the fastest polarization transfer rate. On the other hand, there is almost no Cα-C′ polarization transfer observed for the R21v (v = 1, 2) sequences with rf field irradiation of 40 kHz. At the same time, for the Cα-Cβ recoupling, the R211 symmetry scheme yields the most efficient polarization transfer. Even though the Cα-Cβ polarization transfer can also be accomplished with the R222 sequence, the transfer rate is significantly slower. Confirming the experimental results, the current numerical simulations indicate that DARR (referred to as R212 symmetry sequence here) is inefficient for polarization transfer at high MAS frequencies; furthermore, it is very sensitive to the chemical shift differences, rendering DARR experiments impractical under these conditions.
Figure 5.
Simulated polarization build-up curves for different R2nv and POST R22v recoupling sequences for (a) Cα-Cβ and (b) Cα-C′ correlations. Spin models shown in Figure 4(a) and (b) were used for Cα-Cβ and Cα-C′ simulations, respectively. The 1H Larmor frequency was 599.8 MHz. The MAS frequency was 40 kHz. The solid build-up curves corresponding to the different basic R2nv recoupling sequences are color coded as follows: R211, red; R212, black; R221, blue; and R222, green. The dotted and dashed curves corresponding to POST-type symmetry sequences with composite pulses 90°x270°−x (POST1), and 90°x90°y90°x (POST2), respectively.
As discussed above, the replacement of the basic π pulse by composite pulses, gives rise to the various POST R2nv symmetry sequences, and some of these are expected to yield higher transfer efficiency with the appropriate selection of composite pulses. For example, for Cα-Cβ polarization transfer, POST R221 symmetry sequence consisting of (90x90y90x) composite pulses, exhibits transfer efficiency much higher than the basic R211 scheme. In the case of Cα-C′ recoupling, the POST R222 symmetry sequence, consisting of (90x270−x) composite pulses, exhibits a much higher transfer efficiency than the basic R211 scheme. It should be noted, however, that not all POST R2nv sequences perform better than the basic R2nv schemes. For instance, then POST R221 symmetry sequence, consisting of (90x270−x) composite pulses, has a lower transfer efficiency than the basic R221 scheme for the Cα-Cβ polarization transfer.
In order to understand the behavior of the R2nv symmetry driven sequences as a function of the MAS frequency and the chemical shift difference, one needs to further consider the various factors important in the polarization transfer dynamics. For example, at low or moderate MAS frequencies, DARR (or R212 symmetry sequence) can be regarded as a broadband rotary resonance (RR) based recoupling technique, since the first-order RR matching conditions are broadened greatly by the reintroduced 1H-13C dipolar couplings. Following this logic, one might think that at very fast MAS frequencies, the transfer efficiency in the DARR experiments may be poor since the partly recoupled heteronuclear dipolar interactions are not strong enough to satisfy the first-order RR matching condition. To investigate this possibility, we have examined the extent of dipolar broadening by DARR and by other R2nv symmetry sequences at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. Figure 6 shows the experimental 13C CP/MAS spectra of alanine spun at 40 kHz, recorded with the 1H rf field irradiation during the acquisition period by (a) R212 (DARR), (b) R211, (c) R221, and (d) R222 symmetry pulses. The results show that 13C NMR lines are strongly broadened in the 1D R21v experiments (Figure 6 (a) and (b)), and that the line shapes for these two cases are similar because both sequences have the same number of symmetry-allowed Hamiltonian terms (see Table 1). Interestingly, even though the R221 symmetry scheme retains the largest number of symmetry-allowed 1H-13C and 1H-1H Hamiltonian terms, the broadening of the 13C NMR resonances by the R221 irradiation is much smaller than that by the R211 and R212 sequences. This is the result of the smaller scaling factor for recoupling of the heteronuclear dipolar couplings by R221. Since no first-order average 1H-13C dipolar Hamiltonian terms are allowed in the R222 symmetry scheme (see Table 1), the 13C MAS spectrum exhibiting the least broadening in the presence of the 1H rf field is obtained.
Figure 6.
1D 13C CP/MAS spectra of [U-13C,15N]-alanine spun at 40 kHz. These spectra were recorded with (a) R212, (b) R211, (c) R221, and (d) R222 irradiation applied to the protons during the acquisition period.
It is clear from the above discussion that 13C MAS spectra acquired with the various R2nv irradiation sequences are broadened to different degrees, and in the case of R222 irradiation, no broadening from the recoupled first-order average Hamiltonian interactions ensues. However, these re-introduced dipolar couplings cannot broaden efficiently the first-order rotational resonance conditions (nωr = Δωiso) under very fast MAS, and the polarization transfer profile depends to a greater extent on the second-order rotational resonance conditions (ω1 = nωr ± Δωiso).36 The strength of the rf field irradiation and the size of the recoupled dipolar couplings would jointly dominate the polarization transfer. The degree of broadening in the different R2nv symmetry sequences, therefore, does not directly correspond to the polarization transfer efficiencies, indicating that the dipolar broadening is not the dominant factor in spin diffusion experiments.
Figure 7 provides the experimental 13C-13C polarization transfer dynamics in the various R2nv symmetry-driven spin diffusion experiments for U-13C, 15N-alanine, spun at 40 kHz. The Cα-Cβ and Cα-C′ build-up curves are plotted in Figure 7 (a) and (b), respectively. The results demonstrate that the R211sequence exhibits the most efficient polarization transfer for the Cα-Cβ spin diffusion experiments. For the Cα-C′ polarization transfer, the R22v sequences yields much higher transfer rates than the R21v symmetry sequences. This finding is consistent with the simulation results shown in Figure 5 except for the differences in the transfer rates, which can be attributed to relaxation effects. Various cross-relaxation times, such as T1HH, T1HC and T1CC contribute to the magnetization transfer process, and were not taken into account in SIMPSON simulations. However, disregarding these relaxation times in the numerical simulations does not affect the comparison of the performances of the different R symmetry sequences, as demonstrated experimentally on protein samples (see below). Despite the difference in the absolute transfer rates between the experimental and simulated data the relative polarization transfer dynamics between the different R2 sequences is captured correctly in the simulations.
Figure 7.
Experimental build-up curves for polarization transfer in U-13C, 15N alanine: (a) Cα-Cβ, and (b) Cα-C′, by R212, R211, R221, and R222 symmetry-based sequences. The sample was spun at a MAS frequency of 40 kHz. The cross-peak intensities in each spectrum were normalized to those of the corresponding diagonal peaks in the following way: , where Inorm is the normalized cross peak intensity, IAB is the non-normalized cross peak intensity, IAA and IBB are the non-normalized intensities of the corresponding diagonal peaks.
It should be noted, that although the R212 scheme (DARR or RAD) resulted in the largest broadening of the 13C lines (Figure 6 and discussed above), the DARR polarization transfer efficiency at very fast MAS frequencies is very low, especially for the Cα-C′ correlation experiments, since neither the first-order (nωr = Δωiso) nor the second-order (ω1 = nωr ± Δωiso) rotary resonance conditions are fulfilled at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. In other words, the 1H-13C heteronuclear dipolar couplings are no longer the primary factor in creating uniform 13C-13C polarization transfer at very fast MAS frequencies, and the polarization transfer profile depends on the rf field strength, the chemical shift difference and the size of the recoupled dipolar interactions as well. On the other hand, even though the other R2nv sequences also depend significantly on the chemical shift differences of coupled carbons, each of these experiments exhibits high recoupling efficiency for either Cα-Cβ or Cα-C′ correlations, suggesting that with a pair of experiments, R211 and R222, both types of correlations can be recorded. Alternatively, if a single experiment is desirable to achieve both Cα-Cβ and Cα-C′ correlations, the R221 symmetry sequence can be used. Although this experiment does not exhibit the highest transfer efficiencies for either Cα-Cβ or Cα-C′ correlations, the transfer efficiency is still high enough to attain high sensitivity and uniform excitation for both spectral regions.
To further evaluate the experimental results, we examined the dependence of chemical shift difference on the polarization transfer dynamics at fast and moderate MAS frequencies by numerical simulations. Figure 8 illustrates the simulated dependence of the 13C-13C polarization transfer efficiency on the chemical shift difference for R212, R212, R222, and R221 sequences at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. It can be noted that the R211 symmetry scheme exhibits relatively high polarization transfer efficiency for the coupled 13C spins with small chemical shift differences (of less than 47 ppm). This indicates that the R211 symmetry sequence is suitable for recording Cα-Cβ, Cβ-Cγ, and other sidechain correlations in spin diffusion experiments. On the other hand, essentially no polarization transfer is expected for the coupled 13C spins with chemical shift differences larger than 50 ppm in the R211 experiment, while DARR (the R212 sequence) results in very weak polarization transfer. At the same time, the R222 and R221 symmetry sequences give rise to much higher transfer efficiencies for correlations between coupled carbons with large chemical shift differences, such as Cα-C′ spin pairs whose chemical shift differences are of the order of 120 ppm, even multi-bond Cβ/γ-C′ spin pairs with chemical shift differences of 120–170 ppm. This simulated behavior agrees well with the experimental results presented in Figures 5 and 7.
Figure 8.
Simulated dependence of the 13C-13C polarization transfer efficiency on the isotropic chemical shift difference for various R2nv symmetry sequences: (a) R211, (b) R212 (DARR), (c) R221, and (d) R221. The simulations were performed in SIMPSON and the model spin systems contained 2 protons and 2 carbons. The MAS frequency was 40 kHz, and the mixing time was 4 ms. Note, that the simulated resonance frequency offsets are ±25 kHz covering the entire spectral range for 13C at the magnetic field of 14.1 T.
It is obvious from the above that the polarization transfer under very fast MAS can be driven by the R2nv recoupled dipolar interactions when the second-order rotational resonance conditions are fulfilled, ω1 ± nωr -.KscωDD ≤ Δωiso ≤ ω1 ± nωr + KscωDD, where KscωDD denotes the scaled dipolar couplings re-introduced by R2nv symmetry sequences. However, even when these conditions are fulfilled, it is still difficult to obtain a true broadband recoupling. The transfer efficiency is dependent on the chemical shift difference, and it is therefore anticipated that polarization transfer profile will be dependent on the magnetic field strength. Even though we have not yet performed R-type spin diffusion experiments at magnetic field strengths other than 14.1 T, the magnetic field dependence of the performance of these sequences can be understood by the analysis of Figure 8. The simulated dependence of the chemical shift difference reveals the conditions where strong vs. no correlations would be observed for each R2nv sequence. For instance, at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz, for the R221 sequence there will be no correlations for coupled 13C nuclei with chemical shift differences of 9–14 kHz. Translating the CS difference into ppm, we realize that no correlations are expected between the coupled 13C spins with the chemical shift differences of 90–140 ppm at 9.4 T, of 60–90 ppm at 14.1 T (as confirmed experimentally in this work), and of 40–60 ppm at 21.1 T. In other words, and considering that the R2-driven spin diffusion is accomplished by the second-order rotational resonance conditions, the above considerations imply that the correlation information for the desired chemical shift differences, i.e., aliphatic-to-carbonyl or aliphatic-to-aliphatic regions in proteins, can be obtained at each magnetic field by an appropriate setting of the MAS frequency for each R2nv sequence, i.e. 30 kHz at 9.4 T, 40 kHz at 14.1 T, and 60 kHz at 21.1 T.
Indeed, numerical simulations of the dependence of the polarization transfer efficiencies on the chemical shift differences for each R2nv sequence, conducted for the magnetic field strength of 21.1 T and the MAS frequency of 60 kHz demonstrate that the transfer profiles (see Figure S4 of the Supporting Information) are in agreement with the above analysis, which was made on the basis of the simulations at 14.1 T and 40 kHz.
At moderate MAS frequencies (<20 kHz), the numerical simulations indicate that the polarization transfer dynamics is only mildly dependent on the chemical shift differences, except for the rotational resonance conditions (see Supporting Information). Therefore, broadband homonuclear recoupling can be easily achieved by each of the four R2nv schemes, confirming our experimental observations. This behavior is expected to hold at moderate MAS frequencies for any magnetic field strength practically accessible in a modern NMR spectrometer.
Symmetry-Based Spin Diffusion Experiments at Very Fast MAS Frequencies: Applications to Proteins and Protein Assemblies
As discussed in the previous sections, at very fast MAS frequencies where DARR (R212) experiment fails, the other R2nv symmetry sequences are expected to result in efficient polarization transfer and therefore should be useful for 13C-13C homonuclear correlation spectroscopy of proteins. In Figure 9, we provide the 14.1 T 13C-13C correlation spectra using the various R2nv symmetry schemes for spherical assemblies of U-13C,15N enriched HIV-1 CA capsid protein, spun at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. We note that it is of great interest to further characterize the structure and dynamic properties of this morphology since it relates to the assembly in the immature HIV-1 virions. At the same time, the inherently limited spectral resolution of the spherical assemblies at moderate MAS frequencies (see Supporting Information showing a 10 kHz DARR spectrum) so far made their solid-state NMR studies challenging.
Figure 9.
2D 13C-13C correlation spectra of spherical assemblies of U-13C,15N-enriched HIV-1 CA, recorded at 14.1 T with the different R2nv sequences: (a) R211, (b) R212, (c) R221, and (d) R222. A mixing time of 250 ms was used to record each spectrum. The sample was spun at a MAS frequency of 40 kHz. CW 1H decoupling (ω1 = 9 kHz) was employed in the t1 and t2 dimensions.
As illustrated in Figure 9 (b), at 40 kHz the DARR spectrum exhibits only few cross peaks, even at the mixing time as long as 250 ms. Notably, even cross peaks for directly bonded carbons are not observed in the spectrum, confirming that DARR fails under very fast MAS conditions in proteins. On the other hand, the R211 correlation spectrum displayed in Figure 9 (a) contains a large number of cross peaks in the aliphatic region. However, almost no aliphatic-to-carbonyl correlations are seen, illustrating the inefficient recoupling of the carbon spin pairs with large chemical shift differences by this sequence. Conversely, Figure 9 (d) illustrates that the R222 symmetry irradiation results in very efficient recoupling between the carbonyl and aliphatic carbons with large chemical shift differences, while the polarization transfer within the aliphatic carbons is very weak. The most uniform polarization transfer is achieved by the R221 irradiation, and the corresponding spectrum is provided in Figure 9 (c), exhibiting cross peaks over the entire spectral range. At the same time, the polarization transfer efficiency for spin diffusion within the aliphatic carbons is about 70% of that in the R211 symmetry driven experiment. This is consistent with the numerical simulations presented in Figure 8 and with the model experiments on alanine presented in Figure 7, that show the second highest polarization transfer efficiency for the R221 symmetry scheme among all R2nv sequences, for both aliphatic-to-aliphatic and carbonyl-to-aliphatic carbons. Therefore, the combined results provided in Figure 9 demonstrate that the R222, R221, and R211 symmetry-driven spin diffusion experiments are efficient for 13C-13C correlation spectroscopy in proteins and can be used in place of DARR at very fast MAS frequencies.
Another observation made on the basis of the experimental 13C-13C spin diffusion spectra of spherical HIV-1 CA assemblies acquired at 40 kHz and at 10 kHz is that the 40 kHz R2-based spectra exhibit higher resolution (as illustrated in Figure S6 of the Supporting Information). To further test this experimental observation, we carried out R2-based experiments for U-13C,15N-enriched DLC8 protein. The resulting 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra acquired with MAS frequencies of 10 kHz (DARR) and 40 kHz (R211) are shown in Figure 10. As can be appreciated, the R211 correlation spectrum recorded at ωr=40 kHz (Figure 10 (b)) exhibits significantly higher resolution without any loss of the correlation information, compared to the DARR spectrum at 10 kHz. The 1D slices extracted along the ω1 and ω2 frequency dimensions of the 2D spectra (Figure 10 (c) and (d)), clearly demonstrate that the lines are narrower along both frequency dimensions at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz, even when low-power CW 1H decoupling with the rf field strength of 9 kHz was performed. This resolution gain is also obvious in the comparison of the frequency domains of the indirect (ω1) dimensions of the 40 and 10 kHz R2 and DARR spectra (see Supporting Information).
Figure 10.
Comparison of the aliphatic region of the 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra recorded on U-13C,15N-enriched DLC8. (a) R212 (DARR) spectrum of the sample spun at 10 kHz, high-power TPPM 1H decoupling with (ω1 = 96 kHz) was employed in the t1 and t2 dimensions. (b) R211 spectrum of the sample spun at 40 kHz, low-power CW 1H decoupling (ω1 = 9 kHz) was employed in the t1 and t2 dimensions. Mixing times of 20 and 200 ms were used to record the DARR spectrum at 10 kHz and the R211 spectrum at 40 kHz, respectively. In (c) and (d), 1D slices extracted along the ω2 (I-III) and ω1 (IV-VI) frequency dimensions of the 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra. The first contour in all spectra is set at 5xσ (σ is the noise rmsd) with the multiplier of 1.2.
R2nv driven spin diffusion experiments were also conducted on the sparsely-13C, U-15N-enriched CAP-Gly domain of dynactin in which only few neighboring 13C atoms are enriched (for enrichment pattern, see72–74). Figure 11 displays the 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra with the various R2nv symmetry schemes at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. As can be appreciated, excellent resolution is seen, and the correlation information as well as the transfer efficiencies using the various R2nv sequences for the sparsely labeled CAP-Gly sample are consistent with those obtained for HIV-1 CA protein assemblies and DLC8. Interestingly, in the case of the sparsely enriched CAP-Gly protein, no appreciable resolution enhancements were noted for the MAS frequency of 40 kHz compared to the 10 kHz spectra (see Supporting Information), suggesting that considerable contributions to the linewidths in the 10 kHz spectra of the uniformly enriched proteins are due to 13C-13C dipolar and 13C-15N scalar couplings.
Figure 11.
2D 13C-13C correlation spectra of sparsely-13C, U-15N-enriched CAP-Gly domain of dynactin. The spectra were acquired at 14.1 T with the different R2nv sequences: (a) R211, (b) R212, (c) R221, and (d) R222. Each spectrum was recorded with a mixing time of 300 ms and the sample was spun at a MAS frequency of 40 kHz. The 2D spectra were collected as (1000 × 200) (complex x real) matrices with 128 scans; TPPI scheme was used for phase-sensitive detection in the indirect dimension. Low-power CW 1H decoupling (ω1 = 9 kHz) was employed in the t1 and t2 dimensions. The first contour in all spectra is set at 5xσ (σ is the noise rmsd) with the multiplier of 1.2.
Overall, the above results on model compounds and on three different protein samples demonstrate that R222, R221, and R211 experiments perform well at very fast MAS rates, while DARR and PDSD sequences fail. These R222, R221, and R211 experiments not only have high transfer efficiencies, but also display greatly enhanced spectral resolution for uniformly enriched samples under very fast MAS conditions. Both of these features are critically important in multidimensional experiments for resonance assignments and measurements of distance restraints in large proteins and protein assemblies, in both uniformly labeled and sparsely or selectively labeled samples.
Conclusions
In summary, we describe a family of rotor-synchronized R2nv symmetry sequences for homonuclear correlation spectroscopy in rotating solids, in which R211, R212, R221, or R222 irradiation is applied to the proton spins during the mixing time to assist 13C-13C polarization transfer. Three of these R2-driven spin diffusion sequences (RDSD), R211, R221, and R222, work efficiently at both moderate and fast MAS frequencies. Our results indicate that RDSD sequences exhibit similar transfer efficiencies at moderate MAS rates (up to 20 kHz), and that R211 and POST R221 sequences are superior for the recoupling of coupled spins that possess large chemical shift differences, such as carbonyl-to-aliphatic carbons. At very fast MAS frequencies (40 kHz), where the PDSD and DARR (R212) experiments fail, the R222, R221, and R211 sequences exhibit high polarization transfer efficiencies. Since the broadened second-order rotational resonance conditions (ω1 ± nωr - KscωDD ≤ Δωiso ≤ ω1 ± nωr+ KscωDD) are dominated by the rf field strength and the size of the re-introduced dipolar interactions, these symmetry-based experiments exhibit different dependencies on the chemical shift differences between coupled spins. The R211 sequence is most efficient for recoupling of the carbons with small chemical shift differences, while the R222 sequence shows highest polarization transfer efficiencies for coupled spins with large chemical shift differences. The R221 symmetry sequence displays high transfer efficiency and uniform excitation for both aliphatic-to-aliphatic and carbonyl-to-aliphatic correlations (see the summary figure in Supporting Information). With the replacement of the basic π pulse by various composite pulses, the appropriate POST R2nv symmetry sequences with appropriate are expected to give faster transfer rate and higher transfer efficiency. Given the advantageous properties of the R2nv symmetry-based spin diffusion schemes introduced here, we believe that they will become indispensible for resonance assignments and structure determination of proteins and protein assemblies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS Grant P50GM082251-03 and NCRR grants P20RR015588-10 and 5P20RR017716-07) and is a contribution from the Pittsburgh Center for HIV Protein Interactions.
Footnotes
Supporting information
Tables with 1) details of the recoupled first-order average Hamiltonian terms by R2nv symmetry sequences, and 2) detailed acquisition and processing parameters for 2D 13C-13C RDSD experiments on HIV-1 CA protein, DLC8 and CAP-Gly samples. Figures displaying 1) 1D 13C CP/MAS experiments of [U-13C, 15N]-MLF spun at 10 kHz with R2nv symmetry irradiation. 2) 1D polarization transfer experiments from Cα and Cβ to C′ carbons of MLF with different R2nv irradiation, spun at 10 kHz. 3) 1D polarization transfer experiments from Cα and Cβ to C′ carbon of alanine with different R2nv irradiation, spun at 40 kHz. 4) SIMPSON simulations on the chemical shift offset dependence of the polarization transfer efficiency at MAS rate of 60 kHz and magnetic field of 21.1 T. 5) SIMPSON simulations on the chemical shift offset dependence of the polarization transfer efficiency at MAS rate of 10 kHz. 6) Comparison of the 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra of spherical assemblies of U-13C,15N-enriched HIV-1 CA protein acquired at 10 kHz and 40 kHz. 7) Stack plots of the aliphatic regions of the 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra recorded on U-13C,15N-enriched DLC8. 8) Comparison of the aliphatic region of the 2D 13C-15C correlation spectra recorded for sparsely-13C, U-15N-enriched CAP-Gly at MAS frequencies of 10 and 40 kHz. 9) Comparison of 13C polarization delays along the t1 time domain, extracted from R2 experiments at 10 and 40 kHz on U-13C,15N-enriched DLC8. 10) Summary of optimal applicability regimes for the various R2nv sequences at the MAS frequency of 40 kHz. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Contributor Information
Guangjin Hou, Email: hou@udel.edu.
Si Yan, Email: syan@udel.edu.
Shangjin Sun, Email: shangjin@udel.edu.
Yun Han, Email: yunhan@udel.edu.
In-Ja L. Byeon, Email: ilb6@pitt.edu.
Jinwoo Ahn, Email: jia12@pitt.edu.
Jason Concel, Email: jac192@pitt.edu.
Ago Samoson, Email: ago.samoson@gmail.com.
Angela M. Gronenborn, Email: amg100@pitt.edu.
Tatyana Polenova, Email: tpolenov@udel.edu.
References
- 1.Tycko R. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003;42:53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2023.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Petkova AT, Ishii Y, Balbach JJ, Antzutkin ON, Leapman RD, Delaglio F, Tycko R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:16742–16747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262663499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ma C, Marassi FM, Jones DH, Straus SK, Bour S, Strebel K, Schubert U, Oblatt-Montal M, Montal M, Opella SJ. Protein. Sci. 2002;11:546–557. doi: 10.1110/ps.37302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nishimura K, Kim S, Zhang L, Cross TA. Biochemistry. 2002;41:13170–13177. doi: 10.1021/bi0262799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lorieau JL, Day LA, McDermott AE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:10366–10371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800405105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Han Y, Ahn J, Concel J, Byeon IJ, Gronenborn AM, Yang J, Polenova T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1976–1987. doi: 10.1021/ja908687k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun S, Siglin A, Williams JC, Polenova T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:10113–10126. doi: 10.1021/ja902003u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu J, Durr UH, Im SC, Gan Z, Waskell L, Ramamoorthy A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008;47:7864–7867. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qiang W, Bodner ML, Weliky DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:5459–5471. doi: 10.1021/ja077302m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Franks WT, Wylie BJ, Stellfox SA, Rienstra CM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:3154–3155. doi: 10.1021/ja058292x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun BQ, Rienstra CM, Costa PR, Williamson JR, Griffin RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:8540–8546. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rienstra CM, Hohwy M, Hong M, Griffin RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:10979–10990. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baldus M. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2002;41:1–47. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jaroniec CP, Filip C, Griffin RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10728–10742. doi: 10.1021/ja026385y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Igumenova TI, McDermott AE. J. Magn. Reson. 2005;175:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tian Y, Chen L, Niks D, Kaiser JM, Lai J, Rienstra C, Dunn MF, Mueller L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009;11:7078–7086. doi: 10.1039/b911570f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen L, Kaiser JM, Polenova T, Yang J, Rienstra C, Mueller L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:10650–10651. doi: 10.1021/ja073498e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bennett AE, Ok JH, Griffin RG, Vega S. J. Chem. Phys. 1992;96:8624–8627. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Verel R, Ernst M, Meier BH. J. Magn. Reson. 2001;150:81–99. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Takegoshi K, Nakamura S, Terao T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001;344:631–637. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baldus M, Petkova AT, Herzfeld J, Griffin RG. Mol. Phys. 1998;95:1197–1207. [Google Scholar]
- 22.McDermott A, Polenova T, Bockmann A, Zilm KW, Paulson EK, Martin RW, Montelione GT. J. Biomol. NMR. 2000;16:209–219. doi: 10.1023/a:1008391625633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pauli J, Baldus M, van Rossum B, de Groot H, Oschkinat H. Chem. BioChem. 2001;2:272–281. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20010401)2:4<272::AID-CBIC272>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou G, Paramasivam S, Byeon IJ, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:14873–14883. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00795a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Samoson A, Tuherm T, Gan Z. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2001;20:130–136. doi: 10.1006/snmr.2001.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ernst M, Meier MA, Tuherm T, Samoson A, Meier BH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:4764–4765. doi: 10.1021/ja0494510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Samoson A, Tuherm T, Past J, Reinhold A, Anupold T, Heinmaa N. New Techniques in Solid-State NMR. 2005;246:15–31. doi: 10.1007/b98647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reif B, Jaroniec CP, Rienstra CM, Hohwy M, Griffin RG. J. Magn. Reson. 2001;151:320–327. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou D, Shea J, Nieuwkoop A, Franks W, Wylie B, Mullen C, Sandoz D, Rienstra C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:8380–8383. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou DH, Shah G, Cormos M, Mullen C, Sandoz D, Rienstra C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:11791–11801. doi: 10.1021/ja073462m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou D, Shah G, Mullen C, Sandoz D, Rienstra C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:1253–1256. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ernst M, Detken A, Bockmann A, Meier BH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:15807–15810. doi: 10.1021/ja0369966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Herbst C, Herbst J, Kirschstein A, Leppert J, Ohlenschläger O, Görlach M, Ramachandran R. J. Biomol. NMR. 2009;43:51–61. doi: 10.1007/s10858-008-9292-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lewandowski JR, De Paepe G, Eddy M, Griffin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:5769–5776. doi: 10.1021/ja806578y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lewandowski JR, De Paepe G, Griffin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:728–729. doi: 10.1021/ja0650394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Scholz I, Huber M, Manolikas T, Meier B, Ernst M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;460:278–283. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bloembergen N. Physica. 1949;15:386–426. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meier BH. Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance. New York: Academic Press; 1994. Polarization transfer and spin diffusion in solid-state NMR. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Takegoshi K, Nakamura S, Terao T. J. Chem. Phys. 2003;118:325–2341. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Morcombe CR, Gaponenko V, Byrd RA, Zilm KW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:7196–7197. doi: 10.1021/ja047919t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hong M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2007;111:10340–10351. doi: 10.1021/jp073652j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Loquet A, Bardiaux B, Gardiennet C, Blanchet C, Baldus M, Nilges M, Malliavin T, Böckmann A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:3579–3589. doi: 10.1021/ja078014t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McDermott A, Polenova T. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007;17:617–622. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yang J, Paramasivam S, Marulanda D, Cataldi M, Tasayco ML, Polenova T. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007;45:73–83. doi: 10.1002/mrc.2092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang J, Tasayco ML, Polenova T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:5798–5807. doi: 10.1021/ja711304e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marulanda D, Tasayco ML, McDermott A, Cataldi M, Arriaran V, Polenova T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:16608–16620. doi: 10.1021/ja0464589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jehle S, Hiller M, Rehbein K, Diehl A, Oschkinat H, Rossum B. J. Biomol. NMR. 2006;36:169–177. doi: 10.1007/s10858-006-9078-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Higman V, Flinders J, Hiller M, Jehle S, Markovic S, Fiedler S, Rossum B, Oschkinat H. J. Biomol. NMR. 2009;44:245–260. doi: 10.1007/s10858-009-9338-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Franks WT, Zhou DH, Wylie BJ, Money BG, Graesser DT, Frericks HL, Sahota G, Rienstra CM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:12291–12305. doi: 10.1021/ja044497e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rienstra CM, Tucker-Kellogg L, Jaroniec CP, Hohwy M, Reif B, McMahon MT, Tidor B, Lozano-Perez T, Griffin RG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:10260–10265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152346599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Siemer A, Ritter C, Ernst M, Riek R, Meier B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:2441–2444. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nadaud P, Helmus J, Hofer N, Jaroniec C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:7502–7503. doi: 10.1021/ja072349t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nadaud P, Helmus J, Kall SL, Jaroniec C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:8108–8120. doi: 10.1021/ja900224z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Weingarth M, Bodenhausen G, Tekely P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13937–13938. doi: 10.1021/ja9036143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu J, Struppe J, Ramamoorthy A. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;128:052308. doi: 10.1063/1.2826323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hou G, Deng F, Ye C, Ding S. J. Chem. Phys. 2006;124:234512. doi: 10.1063/1.2206787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hou G, Ding S, Zhang L, Deng F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:5538–5539. doi: 10.1021/ja909550f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.De Paëpe G, Lewandowski J, Loquet A, Böckmann A, Griffin R. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;129:245101. doi: 10.1063/1.3036928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lewandowski JR, De Paepe G, Eddy M, Struppe J, Maas W, Griffin R. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:9062–9069. doi: 10.1021/jp810280t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lange A, Luca S, Baldus M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:9704–9705. doi: 10.1021/ja026691b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lange A, Seidel K, Verdier L, Luca S, Baldus M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:12640–12648. doi: 10.1021/ja034555g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marulanda D, Tasayco ML, Cataldi M, Arriaran V, Polenova T. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:18135–18145. doi: 10.1021/jp052774d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Grommek A, Meier BH, Ernst M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006;427:404–409. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bayro MJ, Huber M, Ramachandran R, Davenport TC, Meier BH, Ernst M, Griffin RG. J. Chem. Phys. 2009;130:114506. doi: 10.1063/1.3089370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Duma L, Abergel D, Ferrage F, Pelupessy P, Tekely P, Bodenhausen G. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2008;9:1104–1106. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Weingarth M, Demco DE, Bodenhausen G, Tekely P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009;469:342–348. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weingarth M, Bodenhausen G, Tekely P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010;488:10–16. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Levitt MH. Symmetry-based pulse sequences in magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR. In: Grant DM, Harris RK, editors. Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Supplementary Volume. Wiley: Chichester, UK; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Carravetta M, Eden M, Zhao X, Brinkmann A, Levitt MH. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;321:205–215. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brinkmann A, Levitt MH. J. Chem. Phys. 2001;115:357–384. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Brinkmann A, Kentgens AP, Anupold T, Samoson A. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;129:174507. doi: 10.1063/1.3005395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.LeMaster DM, Kushlan DM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:9255–9264. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Castellani F, van Rossum B, Diehl A, Schubert M, Rehbein K, Oschkinat H. Nature. 2002;420:98–102. doi: 10.1038/nature01070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hiller M, Higman VA, Jehle S, van Rossum BJ, Kuhlbrandt W, Oschkinat H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:408–409. doi: 10.1021/ja077589n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lightcap CM, Sun S, Lear JD, Rodeck U, Polenova T, Williams JC. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:27314–27324. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800758200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bennett AE, Rienstra CM, Auger M, Lakshmi KV, Griffin RG. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:6951–6958. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Marion D, Wuthrich K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1983;113:967–974. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(83)91093-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bak M. J. Magn. Reson. 2000;147:296–330. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.











