Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Rev. 2011 May 4;21(2):148–166. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9169-7

Biobehavioral Markers of Adverse Effect in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Sandra W Jacobson 1, Joseph L Jacobson 2, Mark E Stanton 3, Ernesta M Meintjes 4, Christopher D Molteno 5
PMCID: PMC3148825  NIHMSID: NIHMS300218  PMID: 21541763

Abstract

Identification of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) is difficult because information regarding prenatal exposure is often lacking, a large proportion of affected children do not exhibit facial anomalies, and no distinctive behavioral phenotype has been identified. Castellanos and Tannock have advocated going beyond descriptive symptom-based approaches to diagnosis to identify biomarkers derived from cognitive neuroscience. Classical eyeblink conditioning and magnitude comparison are particularly promising biobehavioral markers of FASD—eyeblink conditioning because a deficit in this elemental form of learning characterizes a very large proportion of alcohol-exposed children; magnitude comparison because it is a domain of higher order cognitive function that is among the most sensitive to fetal alcohol exposure. Because the neural circuitry mediating both these biobehavioral markers is well understood, they have considerable potential for advancing understanding of the pathophysiology of FASD, which can contribute to development of treatments targeted to the specific deficits that characterize this disorder.

Keywords: Fetal alcohol syndrome, Eyeblink conditioning, Arithmetic, Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, Biomarkers, Behavioral phenotype, Prenatal alcohol exposure


Despite four decades of highly productive research since the first descriptions of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS; Lemoine et al. 1968; Jones and Smith 1973), research on and treatment of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) continue to be hampered by a lack of specificity in behavioral diagnostic criteria and limited understanding of the neural substrates that mediate the observed cognitive deficits. FAS, the most severe form of FASD, is characterized by a distinctive set of facial anomalies (short palpebral fissures, flat midface, thin upper lip, flat or smooth philtrum), accompanied by microcephaly and pre- or postnatal growth retardation (Jones and Smith 1973; Hoyme et al. 2005). Partial FAS (PFAS) is diagnosed when there is a history of heavy maternal drinking during pregnancy, two of the three alcohol-related facial anomalies, and at least one of the following: microcephaly, growth retardation, or cognitive and/or behavioral dysfunction. Alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND), the most prevalent but most difficult to identify of the disorders, is applied to individuals with confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure who lack the craniofacial anomalies of FAS but exhibit measurable, albeit often subtler neurobehavioral deficits (Stratton et al. 1996).

FASD is associated with a broad range of neurobehavioral deficits (see Mattson et al. 2011), including lower IQ (Streissguth et al. 1990; Jacobson et al. 2004), poorer attention and executive function (Coles et al. 1997; Kodituwakku et al. 1995; Carmichael-Olson et al. 1998; Mattson et al. 1999; Burden et al. 2005a), poorer verbal learning and memory (Mattson et al. 1996; Kaemingk et al. 2003; Coles et al. 2010), and slower cognitive processing speed (Streissguth et al. 1990; Jacobson et al. 1993, 1994; Coles et al. 2002; Burden et al. 2005b). Diagnosis of fetal alcohol-related disorders is difficult because information regarding prenatal exposure is often lacking, a large proportion of affected children do not exhibit the distinctive facial anomalies, and no distinctive behavioral phenotype has been identified. Although objective criteria have been developed to diagnose the facial anomalies and growth retardation associated with FAS and PFAS (e.g., Astley and Clarren 2001; Hoyme et al. 2005), cognitive and behavioral deficits have been reported in so many diverse domains that the 1996 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report concluded that any “evidence of…behavior or cognitive abnormalities…inconsistent with developmental level” must be deemed sufficient for a diagnosis of ARND (Stratton et al. 1996). In light of the broad range of neurobehavioral deficits reported in individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure, the IOM panel questioned the feasibility of distinguishing the neurobehavioral problems in FASD from those in other “individuals with complex intellectual deficits,” such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Advances in neuroscience now make it possible to move beyond descriptive, symptom-based approaches to identify neurobehavioral endpoints specifically related to the etiology of FASD that could contribute to a better understanding of the underlying impairment resulting from prenatal alcohol exposure and lead to improved differential diagnosis and development of innovative treatments. Studies applying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the study of FASD have found structural abnormalities in the cerebellum, parietal lobes, corpus callosum, and caudate nucleus (Archibald et al. 2001; Sowell et al. 2001b, 2002, 2008a; Lebel et al. 2011), particularly in the most severely affected individuals, and eight recent studies have documented fetal alcohol-related deficits in white matter integrity using diffusion tensor imagining (DTI) (Fryer et al. 2009; Lebel et al. 2008, 2010; Li et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2005; Sowell et al. 2008b; Wozniak and Muetzel 2011; Wozniak et al. 2006, 2009). However, few human studies have directly linked specific alcohol-related behavioral deficits with structural abnormalities (e.g., Sowell et al. 2001a, 2008a) or examined neural circuitry in relation to alcohol-related neurobehavioral impairment using functional MRI (fMRI).

Because most standard neuropsychological tests are complex and multifaceted, they provide little information about the specific aspects of CNS function that may be adversely affected in FASD. Phenotypically similar behavioral deficits seen in different disorders, such as FASD and ADHD, are hard to distinguish despite different etiologies, although several studies have made significant progress in this area (Coles et al. 1997; Vaurio et al. 2008; Burden et al. 2010; Kooistra et al. 2010; Jacobson et al. 2011a). To address this problem, Castellanos and Tannock (2002) have advocated going beyond descriptive symptom-based approaches to diagnosis to identify specific biomarkers derived from cognitive neuroscience that are “closer to the site of the primary causal agent” than to the manifest behavioral phenotype (p. 619). In studies focusing on genetic susceptibility to psychiatric disease, these biomarkers are termed endophenotypes (Gottesman and Gould 2003). With regard to FASD, the term biomarker can be used to refer to a biological marker of alcohol exposure or a biological endpoint that indicates pathology, like microRNA or protein changes related to pathology. We will use the term biobehavioral marker to refer to a behavioral endpoint linked to FASD whose neural substrates have been identified and can be examined directly. Identification of biobehavioral markers can enable research on FASD to go beyond the search for core deficits to investigate deficits linked to a specific brain region, circuit, chemical imbalance, or pattern of neural activation. In FASD, biobehavioral markers would consist of endpoints whose neural pathways or processes are altered by prenatal alcohol exposure and which mediate the observed neurobehavioral deficits.

Biobehavioral markers of effect are to be distinguished from biomarkers of exposure, such as the fatty acid ethyl ester (FAEE) metabolites of alcohol that are trapped in meconium during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, which can provide a biological indicator of fetal alcohol exposure (Bearer et al. 1999, 2003). Biomarkers of exposure are invaluable for corroborating maternal report of drinking during pregnancy, but they provide no indication regarding the degree of impairment that has resulted from this exposure. Thus, in addition to biomarkers of exposure, biobehavioral markers of effect are needed to identify who among the exposed individuals have been adversely affected. Biobehavioral markers also have the potential to improve diagnosis by advancing our understanding of the neural substrates that mediate the effects of fetal alcohol exposure. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of FASD can, in turn, contribute to the development of treatments that are better targeted to the specific deficits that characterize this disorder.

This paper will focus on two biobehavioral markers of fetal alcohol effect: eyeblink classical conditioning and magnitude comparison. Eyeblink conditioning (EBC) appears to be a particularly promising biobehavioral marker of FASD because a deficit in this elemental form of learning appears to characterize a very large proportion of alcohol-exposed children (Coffin et al. 2005; Jacobson et al. 2008, 2011b). Because the neural substrates of this form of conditioning have been exceptionally well documented in laboratory animals (Christian and Thompson 2003), research on this endpoint provides a excellent opportunity to investigate neural processes that mediate the adverse effects of fetal alcohol exposure. With regard to number processing, arithmetic is a domain of higher order cognitive function that is among the most sensitive to alcohol exposure in utero (Streissguth et al. 1991, 1994; Goldschmidt et al. 1996). Moreover, alcohol-related deficits in exact calculation appear to be mediated by a specific deficit in magnitude comparison, the fundamental ability to represent and manipulate quantity (Jacobson et al. 2011a). fMRI studies by Dehaene and others have identified a fronto-parietal circuit that mediates arithmetic calculation, providing the basis for investigating the neuropathology that mediates the alcohol-related deficit in number processing. It is noteworthy that alcohol-related deficits in both EBC and arithmetic persist after control for IQ (Jacobson et al. 2008, 2011a, b; Carmichael-Olson et al. 1998; Goldschmidt et al. 1996), supporting the inference that they are specific features of FASD over and above the diminished overall intellectual ability associated with this disorder.

Eyeblink Conditioning

Classical eyeblink conditioning is a culturally neutral, nonverbal form of associative learning, in which the onset of a conditioned stimulus (CS), usually a pure tone, precedes an unconditioned stimulus (US), usually a mild air puff to the eye, which elicits a reflexive eyeblink unconditioned response (UR). Initially, the CS evokes no response but with repeated pairings of the tone and air puff, the tone CS comes to elicit an eyeblink response on a large percentage of trials. This eyeblink conditioned response (CR) represents the learned association between tone and air puff. The cerebellar cortex appears to regulate precise timing (latency and duration) of the CR, so that the CR occurs in anticipation of the air puff, thereby protecting the eye from the air puff.

EBC offers several advantages for the study of developmental neurobehavioral disorders (Stanton and Freeman 1994). The operational simplicity and minimal sensory, motor, and motivational demands of the procedure make it applicable with little or no modification across a range of animal species—rodents, rabbits, monkeys, sheep, humans— and across the life-span, beginning in early infancy (Stanton et al. 2010). As a behavioral procedure it has the advantage of offering parametric control of sensory, motivational, and associative variables; as well as a range of task variants that probe multiple brain “memory systems” (Stanton 2000). For example, two useful task variants are delay vs. trace conditioning. In delay conditioning, the tone CS precedes, overlaps, and co-terminates with the onset of the air puff, whereas in trace conditioning, there is a brief stimulus-free “trace interval” between the offset of the tone and the onset of the air puff (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of trial epochs used in delay and trace conditioning

The neural substrates involved in eyeblink conditioning are well understood and have been documented in considerable detail in both humans and animal models (Woodruff-Pak and Steinmetz 2000a, b; Woodruff-Pak and Disterhoft 2008; Christian and Thompson 2003). Short delay conditioning (optimally with an interstimulus interval of 250–500 ms) depends on the cerebellum, whereas long delay and trace conditioning engages forebrain structures, such as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, in interactions with the cerebellum (Stanton 2000; Woodruff-Pak and Steinmetz 2000a, b; Woodruff-Pak and Disterhoft 2008). A well-defined brain stem-cerebellar circuit is both necessary and sufficient for delay conditioning (McCormick and Thompson 1984; Thompson 1986; Lavond et al. 1993; Logan and Grafton 1995; Kim and Thompson 1997; Thompson 2005). In delay conditioning, neural activity representing the tone CS is projected via the colliculus to discrete portions of the pontine nuclei, which convey this information to the cerebellum via mossy fibers in the middle cerebellar peduncle (Fig. 2). Neural activity representing the air puff US is projected via the inferior olive to the cerebellum via climbing fiber projections in the inferior peduncle. Both pontine and olivary inputs reach Purkinje cells in cerebellar cortex and send collateral inputs directly to the cerebellar deep nuclei. Neural plasticity in cerebellar cortex and deep nuclei produced by appropriately timed activation of climbing- and mossy-fiber inputs underlies short-delay conditioning (Thompson 1986, 2005; Krupa et al. 1993; Kim and Thompson 1997; Ohyama et al. 2003). The essential efferent CR pathway consistsof fibers that project from the deep nuclei via the superior cerebellar peduncle to the red nucleus. The CR-related neural activity is then projected to the motor neurons that generate eyeblink CRs.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Simplified diagram of the cerebellar memory circuit of the essential circuitry for classical eyeblink conditioning (adapted from Christian and Thompson 2003)

Reversible lesion studies using cold probe techniques and muscimol, a GABAA agonist in the cerebellar interpositus nucleus abolished eyeblink CRs in previously trained animals and prevented acquisition of new CRs in naïve animals, whereas inactivation of the red nucleus prevented expression but not acquisition of CRs (Krupa et al. 1993; Clark and Lavond 1993; Clark et al. 1992) providing the strongest evidence to date that the cerebellar deep nuclei are critically involved in establishing the eyeblink CR (Steinmetz 2000; Thompson 2005). Two regions within the cerebellar cortex have also been implicated in EBC: cortical lesions restricted to the lobule HVI severely decrease the rate of conditioning and amplitude of the CR (Lavond and Steinmetz 1989), whereas lesions of portions of the anterior lobe disrupt normal timing of CRs (Perrett et al. 1993). The relative contributions of the deep nuclei and cerebellar cortex have also been examined using single-event fMRI in the conscious rabbit to visualize the entire cerebellum simultaneously during unilateral EBC training (Miller et al. 2003). Examination of the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response indicated bilateral learning-related increases in the deep nuclei and deactivation in lobule HVI of the cerebellar cortex early in EBC training and continued bilateral BOLD response in the cortex but predominantly ipsilateral response in the deep nuclei later in training, as the learned response became increasingly refined. Cerebellar activity during EBC described in the rabbit model has been confirmed in young adult humans by positron-emission tomography (Logan and Grafton 1995) and fMRI (Cheng et al. 2008; Molchan et al. 1994; Schreurs et al. 1997).

The role of the hippocampus in trace conditioning has also been studied extensively in both humans and animal models. Hippocampal lesions have little or no effect on delay conditioning but severely disrupt acquisition of trace conditioning (Clark and Squire 1998; Port et al. 1986; Solomon et al. 1986; Moyer et al. 1990; Kim et al. 1995; McGlinchey-Berroth et al. 1997; Weiss et al. 1999; Ivkovich and Stanton 2001). Trace conditioning engages hippocampal plasticity in unit activity (Moyer et al. 1996; Weiss et al. 1996; McEchron and Disterhoft 1997; Power et al. 1997), induces changes in PKC expression (Van der Zee et al. 1997), induces increases in the number of multiple-synapse boutons (Geinisman et al. 2001), and increases survival of newly generated granule cells in adult rats (Gould et al. 1999; Shors et al. 2001).

Eyeblink conditioning emerges gradually over the course of development in both rodents (Stanton and Freeman 2000; Ivkovich et al. 2000; Ivkovich and Stanton 2001) and humans (Stanton et al. 2010). By 5 months post-term, normal human infants reach the same terminal level of conditioning as adults in the short delay procedure (Herbert et al. 2003). Whereas college age students show no trace-delay conditioning differences across a wide range of interstimulus intervals (Ross and Ross 1971), trace conditioning is more difficult for normal, middle class children (Werden and Ross 1972) and infants (Herbert et al. 2003) than for adults.

Eyeblink Conditioning in FASD

Heavy exposure to ethanol during the equivalent of the third trimester of pregnancy in humans disrupts EBC in weanling and adult rats, a deficit that is mediated by a dose-dependent cell loss and altered neural activity in the deep cerebellar nuclei (Green et al. 2002a, b). Binge exposure during this period in rodents is also associated with loss of Purkinje and granule cells in the cerebellum (Dunty et al. 2001; Hamre and West 1993) even after only 2 days of exposure (Thomas et al. 1998). Dikranian et al. (2005) have demonstrated that heavy ethanol exposure in rats and mice on even a single occasion during synaptogenesis triggers acute apoptotic neurodegeneration of Purkinje cells and other neurons in the deep cerebellar nuclei, cerebellar cortex, and two brainstem nuclei, the pontine nuclei and inferior olive, all elements of the EBC circuitry. Coffin et al. (2005) found poorer delay EBC in a sample of school-aged, alcohol-exposed children and in a group of children with dyslexia, a disorder in which the cerebellum is believed to play an important role (Ivry et al. 2001). The alcohol-exposed children in the Coffin et al. study also had notable deficits in reading achievement, a problem previously linked to FASD (Streissguth et al. 1994; Goldschmidt et al. 1996; Molteno et al. in press). The absence of a conditioning deficit in a comparison group of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in that study suggests that delay EBC may have a high diagnostic sensitivity for discriminating between individuals with different disorders who may exhibit similar behavioral problems.

The Cape Town Longitudinal Cohort Study

The incidence of FAS in the Cape Coloured (mixed ancestry) population in the Western Cape Province of South Africa has been estimated to be 18–141 times greater than in the United States (May et al. 2000). This population, composed mainly of descendants of white European settlers, Malaysian slaves, Khoi-San aboriginals, and black Africans, has historically comprised the large majority of workers in the wine-producing region of the Western Cape. The high prevalence of FAS in this community is a consequence of very heavy maternal drinking during pregnancy (Croxford and Viljoen 1999), which is due to poor psychosocial circumstances and the traditional dop system, in which farm laborers were paid, in part, with wine. Although the dop system has been outlawed since the 1920s, regular and heavy alcohol consumption persists in a high proportion (~30%) of women during pregnancy in this community (Jacobson et al. 2006a, 2008) despite numerous efforts to reduce pregnancy drinking. The Cape Coloured community, like those in Russia and the Ukraine with a very high prevalence of heavy drinking during pregnancy (e.g., Miller et al. 2006; Chambers et al. 2008) provides a unique opportunity to prospectively recruit large numbers of newborns with FAS, which would not be possible at a single U.S. site without screening tens of thousands of pregnant women.

In the Cape Town longitudinal study, 159 pregnant women were recruited at an antenatal clinic selected for its high prevalence of heavy maternal alcohol use (Jacobson et al. 2008). A timeline follow-back interview was administered to determine incidence and amount of drinking on a day-by-day basis during a typical 2-week period during early pregnancy (Sokol et al. 1985; Jacobson et al. 2002a). Volume was recorded for each type of beverage consumed each day and converted to absolute alcohol (AA). Any woman reporting a minimum of 14 drinks per week (1.0 oz AA/day) or at least two incidents of binge drinking (≥5 drinks) per month during the first trimester of pregnancy was invited to participate in the study. The next woman initiating antenatal care for whom gestation was within 2 weeks of the heavy drinking mother was also invited to participate, provided that she reported drinking <7 drinks per week and did not binge drink. All the children were assessed for growth and FAS dysmorphology by expert dysmorphologists (HE Hoyme, LK Robinson, N Khaole) using a standard protocol (Hoyme et al. 2005). Based on clinical examination and prenatal alcohol interview, 18.2% of the children born to the heavy drinking mothers in this cohort met criteria for FAS, which is considerably higher than the expected four per 100 heavy drinkers in the U.S. (Abel 1995). An additional 23.2% met criteria for partial FAS (PFAS), while 58.6% of those born to heavy drinking mothers did not exhibit FAS facial anomalies. The high incidence of FAS likely reflects the exceedingly high concentrated pregnancy drinking in this community, which averaged 7.4 drinks/occasion on 3 days/week among the heavy drinking mothers.

Eyeblink Conditioning at 5 Years of Age

Two sessions of delay conditioning consisting of 50 trials each were administered to the children in the Cape Town longitudinal cohort on the same day about 2 h apart at age 5 years; a third session was administered the following day to those children who did not meet criterion for EBC in session 2 (Jacobson et al. 2008).

Children in all diagnostic groups exhibited a consistently high rate of unconditioned response to the air puff (M=79.6% of the trials) during all three sessions (M≥74.7% for each group, indicating that all groups could perceive the air puff and perform the eyeblink response to a similar extent. Table 1 presents the number of children who met criterion for conditioning in each of the three sessions. Prenatally exposed children were significantly less likely to meet the 40% CR criterion for conditioning than the controls. Not a single child of the 10 with FAS was conditioned as contrasted with 75.0% of the 20 controls. Performance in the other alcohol-exposed groups was also poor and was ordered by degree of alcohol exposure. By contrast, three of four non-exposed microcephalic children were conditioned by the second session, supporting the inference that the EBC deficit is specific to prenatal alcohol exposure and can provide a useful biobehavioral marker for the diagnosis of exposed children lacking the distinctive FAS dysmorphology. Although the IQ scores of the non-exposed microcephalic children (M=80.7) were similar to those of the children with FAS and PFAS (M=79.7), they met criterion for conditioning as readily as the controls, whose IQ scores (M=89.4) were significantly higher.

Table 1.

Eyeblink conditioning by session during which child first met criterion at 5 years Values are number of children (%) who met the criterion of at least 40% conditioned responses (CR) in a session. Each child is shown in the session in which s/he first met the CR criterion

Alcohol-exposed
Nonexposed Total
FAS Partial FAS Heavy exposed Control
Session 1 0 (0.0) 2 (11.1) 3 (10.3) 4 (20.0) 9 (11.7)
Session 2 0 (0.0) 3 (16.7) 2 (6.9) 9 (45.0) 14 (18.2)
Session 3 0 (0.0) 1 (5.6) 6 (20.7) 2 (10.0) 9 (11.7)
Total conditioned 0 (0.0) 6 (33.3) 11 (37.9) 15 (75.0) 32 (41.6)
Total N 10 18 29 20 77

Figure 3a shows percent CRs for the first two sessions by diagnostic group. There was a significantly greater increase in CRs across sessions for the controls than for the exposed children, an effect that remained significant after IQ was included as a covariate. Estimated peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC, based on absolute alcohol per occasion, duration drinking per occasion (hours), and maternal weight; Markham et al. 1993), which is available for 30 mothers of the exposed children, averaged 242.2 mg/dL (SD=150.1). This BAC is considerably lower than the lower bound threshold of 300 mg/dL reported in heavily exposed rats who failed to condition (Stanton and Goodlett 1998), suggesting that either this endpoint is more sensitive for humans or the fetus is more sensitive when exposure occurs earlier in development than has been examined to date in the animal model.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Percent conditioned responses in each block by fetal alcohol spectrum disorders diagnostic group (a) at 5 years and (b) at 11 years. Error bars are standard error of the mean. Blocks 1 to 5 = Session 1; Blocks 6 to 10 = Session 2 (N=81 (40 males; 37 females) at 5 years; N=63 (23 males; 40 females) at 11 years)

Replication and Extension of the Eyeblink Conditioning Findings at School Age

Delay EBC was examined in a cross-sectional sample of 63 Cape Coloured children at mean age 11.3 years; trace conditioning, 1.5 years later in 32 of the same children at mean age 12.8 years (Jacobson et al. 2011b). As in our 5-year study, at each age, two sessions of 50 trials each were administered on the same day with two more sessions the next day, for children not meeting criterion for conditioning. The children in all of the diagnostic groups exhibited a consistently high rate of URs to the air puff in both the delay and trace conditioning sessions. The general absence of differences across groups in both the UR and startle responses to the tone suggests that prenatal alcohol exposure did not alter sensory processing of the tone or air puff or the ability to perform the eyeblink response. These findings are also consistent with the animal literature (e.g., Stanton and Goodlett 1998).

Acquisition of delay CRs was impaired in the alcohol-exposed children in this cross-sectional school-age sample, replicating the finding from the Cape Town longitudinal cohort at 5 years. Only 33.3% of the children with FAS and 42.9% of the heavily exposed children met criterion for delay conditioning, compared with 79.3% of the non- or light-exposed controls during the first two sessions (Table 2). Based on a logistic regression analysis, the children with FAS were 7.7 times more likely than controls to fail to meet criterion for conditioning on the delay task; the other heavy exposed group was 5.1 times more likely to fail.

Table 2.

Number (%) of children meeting criterion for delay and trace conditioning at school age by diagnostic group and session during which child first met criterion Values are number of children (%) who met the criterion of at least 40% conditioned responses (CR) in a session

Alcohol-exposed
Nonexposed Total
FAS Heavy exposed Control
Delay conditioning
 Session 1 0 (0.0) 6 (21.4) 12 (41.4) 18 (28.6)
 Session 2 2 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 11 (37.9) 19 (30.2)
 Session 3 1 (16.7) 4 (14.3) 3 (10.3) 8 (12.7)
 Session 4 1 (16.7) 1 (3.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.2)
 Total conditioned 4 (66.7) 17 (60.7) 26 (89.7) 47 (74.6)
 Total N 6 28 29 63
Trace conditioning
 Session 1 1 (16.7) 2 (14.3) 3 (25.0) 6 (18.8)
 Session 2 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1) 5 (41.7) 6 (18.8)
 Session 3 1 (16.7) 4 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (15.6)
 Session 4 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.1)
 Total conditioned 2 (33.3) 8 (57.1) 8 (66.7) 18 (56.3)
 Total N 6 14 12 32

Figures 3a and b show the acquisition curves for percentage CRs for each of the groups in 10-trial blocks for the first two 50-trial sessions of delay conditioning for the 5-year and school-age samples. As seen in Fig. 3a, 5-year-old children in the control group showed a substantial increase in percent CRs at the beginning of Session 2, and their percent CRs remained consistently high throughout the second session. By contrast, there was no evidence of conditioning among the three alcohol-exposed groups across the ten blocks. A remarkably similar pattern is seen in the acquisition curves shown in Fig. 3b for the 11-year cohort. In both figures, there is virtually no overlap of the curves representing the performance of the nonexposed children with those representing the exposed children’s performance. It should be noted that the effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on percent CRs persisted after control for IQ at both ages.

As expected, trace was more difficult than delay conditioning for all of the children but was particularly difficult for the alcohol-exposed groups (Table 2). Only 1 of 6 (16.7%) children with FAS and three of 14 (21.4%) of the heavily exposed children met criterion for trace conditioning, compared with two-thirds of the controls during the first two sessions. The six children with FAS were 10.0 times more likely to fail to meet criterion on the trace task compared with 12 controls, and the 14 heavily exposed children were 7.3 times more likely to fail to meet criterion.

Coffin et al. (2005) noted that one limitation of their study was the relative brevity of their conditioning protocol, which consisted of a single session, and raised the question of whether alcohol-exposed children would acquire the conditioned response if conditioning were given more extended training. This question was subsequently examined in the Cape Town cross-sectional study. Table 2 indicates the session during which each child first met the criterion of 40% CRs. Extended training was beneficial for some exposed children, who met criterion by the third or fourth session for delay conditioning, but both groups continued to perform markedly more poorly than the controls, 89.7% of whom were conditioned by the end of the third session. By contrast to the control children, two-thirds of whom met criterion for trace conditioning in two sessions, the majority of the exposed children who met criterion did not do so until Session 3 or 4. Even with prolonged training, only half as many of the FAS group met criterion for trace conditioning compared to controls, and percent CRs was much lower among the alcohol-exposed children than the controls.

Precision of timing of eyeblinks in delay conditioning was assessed by examining latency to CR onset during the CS tone-alone trials. As shown in Fig. 1, onset of the air puff in the delay task occurred 650 ms after the onset of the tone. The exposed children initiated their CRs significantly later than the controls (Jacobson et al. 2011b). Among the children with FAS, average CR onset during the tone alone trials occurred after the onset of when they had experienced the air puff during the paired trials. For the heavily exposed children, it occurred at the same time as the onset of the air puff, whereas among controls it occurred at or in anticipation of when the air puff would be expected. These findings are consistent with rodent studies, which have shown severe and permanent impairment of the production and timing of responses in eyeblink conditioning in alcohol exposed animals (Brown et al. 2008; Green et al. 2000; Stanton and Goodlett 1998). These deficits have been linked directly to cerebellar damage and reductions in estimated number of Purkinje cells in the developing rat brain (Goodlett et al. 1990; Thomas et al. 1998; Green et al. 2000; Dunty et al. 2001; Maier and West 2001). Thus, although some alcohol-exposed children can benefit from more extensive training, the data on precision of timing suggest that the quality of their CRs continues to be impaired.

These findings are consistent with the report by Coffin et al. (2005), who also found a reduced number and later onset of CRs in school-age, alcohol-exposed children with attention problems and dyslexia. In contrast to the alcohol-exposed children, Coffin et al.’s ADHD group produced CRs at a rate similar to normal controls, but these CRs were of shorter latency, and the children with ADHD were less able to sustain the learned response. Frings et al. (2010) have reported similar patterns. Thus, despite the similarity in clinically assessed attentional problems, the alcohol exposed and ADHD children exhibited distinctive EBC patterns, which Coffin et al. suggest are likely to reflect impairment of distinct cerebellar regions. The most consistent cerebellar difference in children with ADHD is smaller cerebellar vermis (Berquin et al. 1998; Castellanos et al. 2002) but no difference in cerebellar hemispheres, a region in which rats developmentally exposed to alcohol show severe reductions in estimated numbers of Purkinje cells (Goodlett et al. 1990; Thomas et al. 1998). Coffin et al. also noted that these EBC differences may account for the poorer response by alcohol-exposed children to the standard pharmacological interventions for reducing attentional disturbances that have been found to be effective with children with ADHD. They cite Anderson et al. (2002)’s finding that methylphenidate has a beneficial effect on cerebellar vermis but not adjacent cerebellar hemispheres as further support for this interpretation. Thus, delay EBC may discriminate between individuals with different disorders involving cerebellar anomalies who exhibit similar behavioral problems.

Coffin et al. (2005) also examined EBC in a group of children with dyslexia. Like the alcohol-exposed children, the dyslexia group produced few CRs, suggesting a possible similarity in the cerebellar impairment in the two groups. The children in the alcohol-exposed group also had notable problems in reading. However, in a pilot study comparing college-aged dyslexics and normal controls, there was no evidence of conditioning in dyslexics even after five consecutive days of training (Coffin and Boegle 2000), whereas we found that many of the alcohol-exposed children benefited from extended training (Jacobson et al. 2011b). It should be noted, nonetheless, that although more alcohol-exposed children met criterion for conditioning (40% CRs) after four sessions, the impairment persisted in the children with FASD since%CRs had increased to even higher levels in the control children.

The Coffin et al. (2005) and our Cape Town studies used only one short delay interstimulus interval. It has been suggested that EBC paradigms with different interstimulus intervals can provide additional information regarding timing deficits (e.g., Koekkoek et al. 2003; McGlinchey-Berroth et al. 1999). If there is a cerebellar-dependent timing deficit, it should appear at various time intervals. Frings et al. (2010) used a delay EBC paradigm with two different interstimulus intervals to detect possible timing deficits in patients with ADHD. Onset and peak of the CR in the long delay condition occurred earlier in the ADHD group than in controls, but there was no difference in their performance in the short delay condition. This discrepancy suggests that the poorer long delay EBC performance in the ADHD group is likely due to a noncerebellar problem. By contrast, the alcohol-exposed children in our study exhibited timing problems in both the short delay condition and the trace condition, which used a long CS-US interval (see Fig. 1), suggesting that alcohol-related cerebellar damage is implicated in their EBC impairment (Jacobson et al. 2011b). Moreover, these children’s late responses also distinguish them from patients with cerebellar lesions, who tend to respond too early (Frings et al. 2010), which may explain the capacity of some of the alcohol-exposed children to benefit from extended training.

Neuroimaging Studies of FASD Relating to Eyeblink Conditioning

The earliest autopsy studies reporting damaging effects of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure identified errors in cell migration, as well as agenesis or thinning of the corpus callosum, and anomalies in the cerebellum and brain stem (Jones and Smith 1973; Clarren 1977; Clarren and Smith 1978). In a review of four studies, cerebellar dysgenesis was found in 10 of 16 FAS autopsies (Clarren 1986). Cerebellar abnormalities are also found in rats and mice exposed to alcohol prenatally (Miller and Robertson 1993; Maier et al. 1999) with significantly fewer Purkinje cells and lower cerebellar weight to body weight ratios (Bauer-Moffett and Altman 1977; Bonthius and West 1991; Marcussen et al. 1994; Goodlett et al. 1990). In the only study to perform a comprehensive morphometric analysis of the four major cortical lobes, cerebellum, and principal subcortical regions, Archibald et al. (2001) found a significant deficit in total brain volume, with disproportionately smaller volumes in cerebellum, parietal lobe, and caudate nucleus, including a 15% smaller cerebellar volume in individuals with FAS. Analyses comparing cerebrum and cerebellum suggested that cerebellar hypoplasia may exceed cerebral hypoplasia.

A growing body of evidence suggests that white matter is a specific target of alcohol teratogenesis. Archibald et al. found proportionately less cerebral white matter in their FAS group, suggesting an effect on myelination that has also been observed in ethanol-exposed animals (Bichenkov and Ellingson 2001; Zoeller et al. 1994). White matter lesions have also been observed in preterm infants with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (Holzman et al. 1995). These lesions were also seen in fetal alcohol exposed sheep (Watari et al. 2006). Studies with fetal alcohol exposed rodents have reported decreases in axon size, increased packing density, and thinner myelin sheaths (Miller and Al-Rabiai 1994), as well as abnormalities in the oligoden-drocytes that produce the myelin sheath (Chiappelli et al. 1991; Guerri et al. 2001). As detailed below, we have recently identified fetal alcohol-related microstructural deficits in the cerebellar peduncles, large bundles of myelinated nerve fibers that connect the cerebellum to the brainstem and play a major role in the EBC circuit (Spottiswoode et al. in press).

Several considerations make eyeblink conditioning an excellent candidate to serve as a biobehavioral marker of fetal alcohol effect, including the high sensitivity of both trace and delay conditioning to prenatal alcohol exposure, the detailed information available regarding the neural structures and pathways that mediate this elemental form of learning, and the evidence of the sensitivity of cerebellum and white matter to alcohol exposure in utero. As a biobehavioral marker, this paradigm has considerable potential to advance understanding of the neural mechanisms that mediate fetal alcohol effects. In a recent DTI study focusing on the cerebellar peduncles, we found a dose-dependent inverse relation between prenatal alcohol exposure and fractional anisotrophy (FA) in a region of the left middle peduncle (Spottiswoode et al. in press). Higher FA in that region was also related to better performance on trace EBC. In a multiple regression analysis, the effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on trace EBC was reduced from r=−.61 to β=−.28 when FA in that region was entered in the analysis—a decrease that was statistically significant. That substantial decrease suggests that that the alcohol-related trace EBC deficit is mediated, in part, by microstructural impairment in the left middle peduncle. By contrast, the regression coefficient relating prenatal alcohol to trace EBC was virtually unchanged when total brain volume and cerebellar volume were each added to the analysis, indicating that brain volume per se does not mediate this deficit. The effect of alcohol exposure on trace conditioning was, however, significantly mediated by cerebellar white matter volume.

Number Processing

Among the broad range of cognitive deficits, arithmetic is a particularly sensitive endpoint of fetal alcohol exposure (Rasmussen and Bisanz 2009). In assessments of academic achievement conducted in the moderately exposed Seattle 500 cohort, arithmetic was the domain most strongly related to maternal drinking in pregnancy at both 7.5 (Streissguth et al. 1990) and 14 years (Streissguth et al. 1994). Similarly, in the Atlanta cohort, arithmetic was the academic subtest of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) most strongly related to prenatal alcohol exposure at 6 years (Coles et al. 1991), and arithmetic and digit span were the Wechsler IQ subtests most strongly related to pregnancy drinking in the Detroit longitudinal cohort at 7.5 years (Jacobson et al. 2004). In a study comparing adolescents with alcohol-related dysmorphic features with a group of children in special education classes, the special education students were more impaired in basic reading and spelling, whereas the alcohol-exposed adolescents were more impaired in mathematics and mathematical reasoning (Howell et al. 2006). In the Pittsburgh cohort, prenatal alcohol exposure was related to poorer performance on standardized tests of reading, spelling, and arithmetic, but only the effect on arithmetic was dose-dependent and remained significant after statistical adjustment for IQ (Goldschmidt et al. 1996).

The children in the Detroit cohort were administered reaction time tasks at 7.5 years using a Sternberg (1966) paradigm to assess four domains of cognitive processing—short-term memory scanning, mental rotation, directional discrimination, and number comparison (Burden et al. 2005b). In the Sternberg paradigm, the slope of the reaction times across task items of increasing difficulty is used to assess cognitive processing speed and efficiency in a given domain, controlling for influences from other, unrelated domains involved in performance of the task, including response organization and execution and motor speed. After control for potential confounders, prenatal alcohol exposure was related to poorer cognitive processing efficiency only on the number comparison task. Kopera-Frye et al. (1996) compared adults with FAS or fetal alcohol effects with healthy controls matched for age, gender, and education level on a series of number processing tasks. Although the performance of the alcohol-exposed adults on number reading and dictation was not affected, they performed significantly more poorly on tasks involving arithmetic calculation and proximity judgment. In a sample of adults diagnosed with FAS who performed poorly on standardized tests of reading, spelling, and arithmetic, arithmetic scores were significantly lower than scores on reading or spelling (Kerns et al. 1997).

Brain Mechanisms Mediating Number Processing

Brain lesion and neuroimaging studies have identified two distinct functional neural networks relating to number processing—(a) a core quantity system, in which numerical quantity (magnitude and distance) is represented in a language-independent format, possibly resembling a number line (Dehaene et al. 2004); and (b) mental calculation, involving manipulation of verbally-encoded numbers and verbally-stored knowledge (e.g., arithmetic facts) (Menon et al. 2000; Zago et al. 2001). Magnitude comparison, the ability to evaluate relative quantities, has been shown to be mediated primarily by activity in the anterior portion of the horizontal section of the intraparietal sulcus (HIPS) (Dehaene et al. 2003; Eger et al. 2003; Pinel et al. 2004). It emerges early in development (Meintjes et al. 2010a; Wynn et al. 2002;) and is clearly evident at 4–5 years of age (Temple and Posner 1998; Cantlon et al. 2006). The anterior HIPS is activated by the representation of semantic information about magnitude, whether presented as Arabic numbers, sequences of words, or analogically (e.g., by numbers of dots) (Dehaene and Cohen 1995; Naccache and Dehaene 2001). Activations in the anterior HIPS increase as the complexity of the calculation increases; for example, in calculations entailing a greater number of operands (Menon et al. 2000).

Calculation involves recruitment of a fronto-parietal number processing network that includes the anterior HIPS (Chochon et al. 1999; Simon et al. 2002) and the angular gyrus in the parietal lobe in interaction with a frontal executive brain system (Zago et al. 2008) not specific to number processing. The frontal executive system mediates the integration and management of numerical operations in working memory, response decision and execution, and error monitoring (Gruber et al. 2001; Menon et al. 2000). Thus, intensity of inferior frontal activation is directly proportional to the time pressure imposed during a number processing task rather than the complexity of the numerical calculation per se (Menon et al. 2000).

In school-age children, number processing is associated with activation of a similar parietofrontal network to that seen in adults, including the anterior HIPS (Cantlon et al. 2006; Kaufman et al. 2006; Meintjes et al. 2010a), although activations are also seen in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC; Kucian et al. 2006; Kaufman et al. 2006) and the left precentral sulcus (Kawashima et al. 2004). In their meta-analysis, Ridderinkhof et al. (2004) showed that activations of the pMFC, which includes the anterior cingulate cortex, are associated with pre-response conflict, decision uncertainty, and error detection. The activation in the precentral sulcus commonly seen in number processing in children overlaps with the premotor strip at the coordinates of finger representation. Given that finger counting is a spontaneous numerical learning strategy that has been observed cross-culturally (Butterworth 1999), it has been suggested that a fronto-parietal finger movement network may develop in the skilled user to become a substrate that mediates numerical knowledge (Pesenti et al. 2000; Zago et al. 2001).

Magnitude Comparison as a Mediator of Fetal Alcohol-Related Effects on Number Processing

In a recent study, Jacobson et al. (2011a) have shown that a specific deficit in the ability to represent and manipulate quantity appears to play a critical role in the poor arithmetic performance seen in FASD. A 224-item, 7-subtest, computer-based Number Processing test, developed in collaboration with S. Dehaene, was administered to 262 adolescents from the Detroit Longitudinal Cohort at 14 years. Prenatal alcohol exposure was significantly related to poorer performance on one subtest after control for confounding, Approximate Subtraction, and was most strongly related to Number Comparison (“Which number is larger?”) and Proximity Judgment (“Which of two numbers is closer to a third?”). A factor analysis of the seven subtests yielded two factors, one for “Calculation,” which included Exact Addition, Subtraction, and Multiplication and Approximate Addition and Subtraction; the other “Magnitude Comparison,” which comprised Number Comparison and Proximity Judgment. Prenatal alcohol exposure was significantly related to both the Calculation and Magnitude Comparison composite measures.

Multiple regression analysis showed that the relation of prenatal alcohol exposure to Calculation was fully mediated by its relation to Magnitude Comparison since the entry of Magnitude Comparison into the regression reduced the effect of alcohol on Calculation from r=−.14 to β=.03 (Fig. 4). The Sobel test showed that the coefficients for the path indicating that the effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on Calculation is mediated via Magnitude Comparison was highly significant, z=−3.54, p<.001. This finding suggests that a specific deficit in the ability to represent and manipulate quantity plays a critical role in the poorer arithmetic achievement frequently seen in FASD and may be a core deficit of the disorder.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Path model examining the degree to which the relation of prenatal alcohol exposure to the Calculation composite score is mediated by Magnitude Comparison

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was evaluated in the children in the Detroit cohort at 7.5 and 14 years of age based on parent, teacher, and examiner ratings on check lists of behavioral symptoms that constitute the criteria for a DSM diagnosis (Burden et al. 2010; Jacobson et al. 2011a). Using this approach, 32.8% of the children met criteria for a diagnosis of ADHD, confirming the co-morbidity of this disorder with FASD (Mick et al. 2002; Fryer et al. 2007). Effects of ADHD on number processing were compared with effects of prenatal alcohol exposure for the sample as a whole, including children who were co-morbid for prenatal alcohol exposure and ADHD in both sets of analyses. ADHD was related to poorer performance on all seven number processing subtests, after control for confounders but, by contrast to the alcohol-exposed children, the associations were markedly stronger with the exact and approximate calculation subtests and the Calculation composite than with Number Comparison, Proximity Judgment, or the Magnitude Comparison composite. Moreover, the relation of ADHD to the exact and approximate calculation subtests was markedly reduced when IQ was added at the last step of the multiple regression analysis, suggesting that effects of ADHD on aspects of calculation not specific to the representation of number, such as, attention and executive function, mediate the poorer number processing seen in that disorder. The hypothesis that IQ mediates the effect of ADHD on the two composite measures was evaluated statistically using the Sobel test. The relation of ADHD to both composites was significantly mediated by IQ; for Calculation, z=−2.75, p<.01, for Magnitude Comparison, z=−1.96, p<.05. By contrast, IQ did not mediate the effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on either Calculation, z=−1.37, or Magnitude Comparison, z=−1.28, both p’s>.15, presumably because the alcohol-related arithmetic deficits are not mediated by deficits in higher order cognitive processing.

The finding that Magnitude Comparison is the principal aspect of number processing affected by fetal alcohol exposure has been replicated in a study of children from the Cape Town cross-sectional cohort, who were evaluated at a mean age of 10.4 years (SD=1.2). A confirmatory factor analysis specifying two factors yielded the same pattern observed in Detroit—exact and approximate addition, subtraction, and multiplication loaded on a Calculation factor; Number Comparison and Proximity Judgment, on a Magnitude Comparison factor. Whereas prenatal alcohol exposure was unrelated to the Calculation composite score after control for confounders (β=−.06, p>.20), it was significantly related to the Magnitude Comparison Composite (β=−.25, p<.05) after control for socioeconomic status, postnatal lead exposure, and child age at testing. Thus, these data provide additional evidence identifying mental representation of relative quantity as the principal aspect of number processing adversely affected by fetal alcohol exposure.

Neuroimaging Studies Relating to Number Processing in FASD

A functional MRI (fMRI) study of 18 healthy control children from the Cape Town cross-sectional cohort (Meintjes et al. 2010a) confirmed that mental representation of quantity and distance is mediated by activation of the intraparietal sulcus, as has been extensively documented in adults (Dehaene et al. 2003; Eger et al. 2003). In an fMRI study of the Atlanta cohort using a subtraction task, young adults with fetal alcohol-related dysmorphology showed less activation in the inferior parietal and other math-related regions compared with normal controls (Santhanam et al. 2009). In a comparison of children diagnosed with FAS or PFAS with healthy controls in the Cape Town cross-sectional cohort, the anterior HIPS activation during Proximity Judgment was right lateralized in the control children as it is in adults (Chochon et al. 1999) but left lateralized in the FAS/PFAS group (Meintjes et al. 2010b). By contrast, the anterior HIPS activation was left lateralized during Exact Addition in the control group as would be expected for verbally-mediated addition problems but bilateral in the children with FAS and PFAS. In addition, by contrast to the control group, the children with FAS and PFAS failed to exhibit an activation in the left precentral sulcus, which is involved in finger counting (Butterworth 1999) and believed to function as a substrate that mediates numerical knowledge in normal children and adults (Pesenti et al. 2000; Zago et al. 2001).

Whereas control children exhibited highly focused activations of the intraparietal sulcus during both tasks, the alcohol-exposed children exhibited a highly diffuse parietal activation during Proximity Judgment, which included the left and right angular gyrus and posterior cingulate/precuneus (Meintjes et al. 2010b). Data from several studies suggest that the left angular gyrus and adjacent frontal perisylvian areas are more likely to be activated for number processing problems requiring more extensive verbal mediation (Dehaene et al. 2003; Zago et al. 2001; Venkatraman et al. 2005). Gruber et al. (2001) found increased activations in the precuneus/posterior cingulate region for simple tasks requiring arithmetic fact retrieval and note that this region is activated in semantically cued word retrieval facts (Fletcher et al. 1996). The activations of the left angular gyrus, precuneus/posterior cingulate, and left anterior HIPS suggest that the exposed children may rely more on verbal recitation of the numbers and/or verbally-mediated subtraction operations to solve the PJ problems, instead of the nonverbal quantity comparison processing that has been shown to be mediated by the right anterior HIPS (Chochon et al. 1999).

During Exact Addition, the control children in the Cape Town cohort (Meintjes et al. 2010b) exhibited activations of a fronto-parietal network similar to that linked to number processing in adults (Chochon et al. 1999). The exposed children, by contrast, exhibited more diffuse and wide-spread activations, including the cerebellar vermis and cortex, which have been found to be activated in adults engaged in particularly challenging number processing problems. This recruitment of a broader range of regions to perform these relatively simple addition problems suggests a deficit in functional integration of the neural circuitry that is most efficient for the manipulation and processing of numerical quantity. The functional deficits in the parietal region seen in the exposed children in these neuroimaging studies are consistent with evidence from structural MRI studies reporting alcohol-related impairment in the parietal region, including disproportionately smaller lobular volume (Archibald et al. 2001) and less gray matter and cortical thickness, and shape anomalies in the parietal and temporal regions (Sowell et al. 2001b, 2002, 2008a).

Infant Numerosity

Characterization of FASD during development and the design of effective early interventions require identification of the fundamental and earliest emerging cognitive processes that are affected by prenatal alcohol exposure—processes that provide the basis for the higher-order deficits in cognitive processing seen in affected children and adults. Recent evidence suggests that early precursors of alcohol-related impairment in magnitude comparison can be detected already in infancy. Infants can discriminate small precise numerosities (see reviews in Mix et al. 2002; Butterworth 2005). Wynn (1992) has shown that infants as young as 5 months of age can discriminate between correct displays (e.g., 1+1=2) and errors (e.g., 1+1=1) in simple arithmetic problems involving small numbers of items. When the number of puppets displayed does not agree with the number previously seen being placed on the stage, infants look longer at the display than when the number agrees with their expectations (Wynn 1995, 1996; Wynn and Chiang 1998). When the Wynn paradigm was administered to the Cape Town Longitudinal Cohort in infancy, nonexposed infants (as predicted) looked longer at puppet displays that were incongruent with their expectations (Jacobson et al. 2002b). By contrast, alcohol-exposed infants’ looking time was the same to both the expected and unexpected displays, indicating a failure to discriminate among these small numerosities. Looking time differences (incongruent minus congruent) on the Wynn paradigm at 6 and 13 months were subsequently converted to z-scores and averaged to provide a composite measure of numerosity performance. Numerosity on the Wynn paradigm predicted performance on the Number/Quantity and Digit Span subtests of the Junior South African Intelligence Scale (J-SAIS), r=.34, p<.01, and r=.25, p<.05, respectively, at 5 years but was unrelated to the J-SAIS subtests assessing vocabulary and fine motor function, r’s=.10 and −.01, both p’s>.20, indicating discriminant predictive validity for this infant numerosity paradigm.

Conclusions

Whereas biomarkers of exposure, such as FAEE metabolites of alcohol in meconium, can provide verification of maternal reported alcohol consumption during pregnancy, biobehavioral markers of effect are needed to help identify which exposed children are adversely affected. Classical EBC and magnitude comparison provide good examples of biobehavioral markers in that the pattern of effects seen on these endpoints appears to be relatively specific to FASD and is mediated by neural processes and pathways that have been well characterized in the animal model and/or neuro-imaging literatures. Working memory is a third endpoint that could be examined as a potential biobehavioral marker since it is seen in FASD after statistical adjustment for IQ (Burden et al. 2005a, b, O’Hare et al. 2009; Diwadkar et al. in press) and its neural substrates have been extensively documented (Wager and Smith 2003; Kirschen et al. 2005). Verbal encoding, recall, and recognition discrimination, as assessed on the California Verbal Learning Test, may also warrant consideration as biobehavioral markers since they have been linked to FASD (e.g., Mattson et al. 1996; Mattson and Roebuck 2002; Willford et al. 2004; O’Leary et al. in press) and to deficits in cerebellar vermis and corpus callosum (Sowell et al. 2001a, b, 2008a, b).

Although the comparison with ADHD demonstrates that magnitude comparison is a relatively specific endpoint for prenatal alcohol exposure, this outcome is less sensitive than eyeblink conditioning. To examine sensitivity, we used a cut-off of 1 standard deviation (SD) below the mean in the control group to indicate poor performance. Whereas 16.4% of the controls in the Detroit study performed at more than 1 SD below the mean, almost twice as many of the exposed adolescents (27.8%) performed below this cut-off. In Cape Town, 12.9% of the controls performed at more than 1 SD below the mean, and almost three times as many exposed children (35.3%) performed poorly. By contrast, as reported above, all of the children with FAS and 63.8% of the other heavily exposed children failed to meet criterion for eyeblink conditioning at 5 years and at school age, 66.7% of the children with FAS and 57.2% of the other heavily exposed children failed to reach criterion within two sessions. Given that some children with prenatal alcohol exposure may be protected from the effects of alcohol (e.g., Jacobson et al. 2006a, b) and not exhibit adverse effects, these biobehavioral markers can be useful in identifying which exposed children are affected and which appear to be spared. Taking performance on both these biobehavioral markers into account can further improve identification of alcohol-exposed children. In the school age Cape Town cohort, 58.8% of the alcohol-exposed children failed to meet criterion for delay EBC and 35.3% for magnitude comparison, but 71.1% of the exposed children were identified on at least one of these biobehavioral markers.

It is not clear that either of these biobehavioral markers should be used routinely in the screening of alcohol-related disorders; the sensitivity of magnitude comparison is limited, and the EBC assessment is difficult to administer and requires two 15-minute sessions given at least 2–3h apart. Nevertheless, where FAS, PFAS, or ARND is suspected, EBC and magnitude comparison could generate valuable information as part of an in-depth clinical examination of the child by an interdisciplinary team, including a geneticist to rule out other disorders and examiners with expertise to conduct conditioning trials and psychometric testing. If the child is known to be alcohol exposed or even if no history of maternal alcohol use available but the child has some features or behaviors suggestive of fetal alcohol exposure, failure to meet criterion on the EBC assessment would provide an additional strong indicator of likely damage to the cerebellar-brain stem circuitry frequently affected in FASD; poor performance on magnitude comparison, of likely damage to the relevant fronto-parietal circuitry.

This in-depth clinical assessment, combined with other biobehavioral markers of FASD, would provide a more definitive diagnosis than a low IQ score, which is neither specific to this disorder nor sufficiently sensitive, particularly when moderate rather than heavy alcohol exposure is involved (Jacobson et al. 2004). As indicated earlier, EBC and magnitude comparison are both unrelated to IQ performance and can, therefore, be used to detect alcohol-related impairment in children performing in the normal IQ range. EBC performance is also unrelated to socioenvironmental background or verbal competence, which are often confounded with IQ deficits. Similarly, as noted above, ADHD and arithmetic problems are often co-morbid in alcohol-exposed children, but evidence of specific problems in magnitude representation increases the likelihood that fetal alcohol exposure is involved. Assessments of performance on biobehavioral markers can also provide valuable information regarding specific domains of function in need of remediation. Thus, when a child whose mother is suspected of heavy alcohol use during pregnancy presents with ADHD-like symptoms, assessment of magnitude comparison can aid in a differential diagnosis that may lead to a different pharmacological treatment, since methylphenidate and other psychostimulants often prescribed for ADHD have not proven to be as effective with children with FASD (see Kodituwakku and Kodituwakku 2011). The Math Learning Experience (MILE) intervention developed by Kable and Coles (Kable et al. 2007) is particularly well suited for remediating the specific fetal alcohol-related deficits in magnitude comparison.

An important strength of these biobehavioral markers is that they have been linked in cognitive neuroscience studies to specific neural processes that can be assessed in infancy. They can, therefore, be used to evaluate the efficacy of novel prenatal interventions (e.g., supplementation with micronutrients) several months or years before appropriate neurobehavioral assessments can be administered and to validate new diagnostic procedures (e.g., facial measurements from 3-D images; Moore et al. 2007; Klingenberg et al. 2010). They can also provide baseline data for evaluating novel postpartum interventions (e.g., therapeutic motor training developed by Klintsova et al. 1998; Jirikowic et al. 2010), whose efficacy for reversing or mitigating alcohol effects can be assessed by measurement again at the conclusion of the intervention. As we have emphasized, the neural circuitry mediating both these biobehavioral markers is well understood. Future studies of fetal alcohol effects on specific components of this neural circuitry have considerable potential for providing important information regarding the pathophysiology of FASD, which can, in turn, contribute to the development of treatments that are better targeted to the specific deficits that characterize this disorder.

Acknowledgments

The Detroit longitudinal study was funded by grants R01 AA06966, R01 AA09524, and P50 AA0706 from the NIH/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Recruitment of the Cape Town longitudinal cohort was funded by two administrative supplements to R01-AA09524, the NIH Office of Research on Minority Health, and the Foundation for Alcohol Related Research, Cape Town, South Africa. The 5-year follow-up assessment of the Cape Town longitudinal cohort was funded by U01 AA014790 in conjunction with the NIAAA Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD); the 9-year follow-up by R01 AA016781. Recruitment and assessment of the Cape Town crosssectional cohort were funded by an NIH Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award from the NIH (R03 TW007030), a Children’s Bridge grant from the Office of the President of Wayne State University, a Focus Area grant (FA2005040800024) from the National Research Foundation of South Africa, the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa, and a seed money grant from the University of Cape Town. The Cape Town dysmorphology assessments were funded, in part, by U24 AA014815 from CIFASD. All these projects received supplemental funding from the Joseph Young, Sr., Fund from the State of Michigan. We thank Robert J. Sokol for his collaboration in the Detroit longitudinal study; Denis Viljoen for his collaboration in the recruitment of the Cape Town longitudinal cohort; John C. Gore and J. Christopher Gatenby for their collaboration in the implementation of the Cape Town neuroimaging studies; Rafael Klorman and Joel Nigg for their collaboration in the ADHD diagnosis; H. Eugene Hoyme, Luther K. Robinson, and Nathaniel Khaole, for performing the FAS dysmorphology assessments; and Neil C. Dodge for assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Sandra W. Jacobson, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 2751 E. Jefferson, Suite 460, Detroit, MI 48207, USA; Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Joseph L. Jacobson, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 2751 E. Jefferson, Suite 460, Detroit, MI 48207, USA; Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Mark E. Stanton, Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

Ernesta M. Meintjes, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; MRC/UCT Medical Imaging Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Christopher D. Molteno, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

References

  1. Abel EL. An update on the general incidence of FAS: FAS is not an equal opportunity deficit. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 1995;17:437–443. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(95)00005-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson CM, Polcari A, Lowen SB, Renshaw PF, Teicher MH. Effects of methylphenidate on functional magnetic resonance relaxometry of the cerebellar vermis in boys with ADHD. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159:1322–1328. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Archibald SL, Fennema-Notestine C, Gamst A, Riley EP, Mattson SN, Jernigan TL. Brain dysmorphology in individuals with severe prenatal alcohol exposure. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2001;43:148–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Astley SJ, Clarren SK. Measuring the facial phenotype of individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure: correlations with brain dysfunction. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2001;36:147–159. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/36.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer-Moffett C, Altman J. The effect of ethanol chronically administered to preweanling rats on cerebellar development: a morphological study. Brain Research. 1977;119:249–268. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90310-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bearer CF, Lee S, Salvator AE, Minnes S, Swick A, Yamashita T, et al. Ethyl linoleate in meconium: a biomarker for prenatal ethanol exposure. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1999;23:487–493. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bearer CF, Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, Barr D, Croxford J, Molteno CD, et al. Validation of a new biomarker of fetal exposure to alcohol. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2003;143:463–469. doi: 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00442-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berquin PC, Giedd JN, Jacobsen LK, Hamburger SD, Krain AL, Rapoport JL, et al. Cerebellum in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a morphometric MRI study. Neurology. 1998;50:1087–1093. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.4.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bichenkov E, Ellingson JS. Ethanol exerts different effects on myelin basic protein and 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase expression in differentiating CG-4 oligodendrocytes. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research. 2001;128:9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(01)00142-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonthius DJ, West JR. Permanent neuronal deficits in rats exposed to alcohol during the brain growth spurt. Teratology. 1991;44:147–163. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420440203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown KL, Calizo LH, Stanton ME. Dose-dependent deficits in dual interstimulus interval classical eyeblink conditioning tasks following neonatal binge alcohol exposure in rats. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2008;32:277–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burden MJ, Jacobson SW, Sokol RJ, Jacobson JL. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on attention and working memory at 7.5 years of age. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005a;29:443–452. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000156125.50577.ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Burden MJ, Jacobson SW, Jacobson JL. The relation of prenatal alcohol exposure to cognitive processing speed and efficiency in childhood. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005b;29:1473–1483. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000175036.34076.a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burden MJ, Jacobson JL, Westerlund AJ, Lundahl LH, Klorman R, Nelson CA, et al. An event-related potential study of response inhibition in ADHD with and without prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2010;34:617–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Butterworth B. The mathematical brain. Macmillan; London: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  16. Butterworth B. The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2005;46:3–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM, Carter EJ, Pelphrey KA. Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-yr-old children. PLoS Biology. 2006;4:e125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carmichael-Olson H, Feldman JJ, Streissguth AP, Sampson PD, Bookstein FL. Neuropsychological deficits in adolescents with fetal alcohol syndrome: clinical findings. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1998;22:1998–2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Castellanos FX, Tannock R. Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2002;3:617–628. doi: 10.1038/nrn896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Castellanos FX, Lee PP, Sharp W, Jeffries NO, Greenstein DK, Clasen LS, et al. Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA. 2002;288:1740–1748. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chambers CD, et al. Predictors of binge drinking during pregnancy among women in Ukraine; Abstract poster presented at American Public Health Association meeting; Oct, 2008. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng DT, Disterhoft JF, Power JM, Ellis DA, Desmond JE. Neural substrates underlying human delay and trace eyeblink conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:8108–8113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800374105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chiappelli F, Taylor AN, Espinosa de los Monteros A, de Vellis J. Fetal alcohol delays the development expression of myelin basic protein and transferring in rat primary oligodendrocyte cultures. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 1991;9:67–75. doi: 10.1016/0736-5748(91)90074-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chochon F, Cohen L, van de Moortele PF, Dehaene S. Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999;11:617–630. doi: 10.1162/089892999563689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Christian KM, Thompson RF. Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. Learning & Memory. 2003;10:427–455. doi: 10.1101/lm.59603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Clark RE, Lavond DG. Reversible lesions of the red nucleus during acquisition and retention of a classically conditioned behavior in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1993;107:264–270. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clark RE, Squire LR. Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science. 1998;280:77–81. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Clark RE, Zhang AA, Lavond DG. Reversible lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus during acquisition and retention of a classically conditioned behavior. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1992;106:879–888. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.6.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Clarren SK. Central nervous system malformations in two offspring of alcoholic women. Birth Defects Original Article Series. 1977;13:151–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Clarren SK. Neuropathology and fetal alcohol syndrome. In: West JR, editor. Alcohol and brain development. Oxford University Press; New York: 1986. [Google Scholar]
  31. Clarren SK, Smith DW. The fetal alcohol syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1978;298:1063–1067. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197805112981906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Coffin JM, Boegle A. Failure of dyslexics to achieve eyeblink conditioning following five days of training. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 2000:26. [Google Scholar]
  33. Coffin JM, Baroody S, Schneider K, O’Neill J. Impaired cerebellar learning in children with prenatal alcohol exposure: a comparative study of eyeblink conditioning in children with ADHD and dyslexia. Cortex. 2005;41:389–398. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70275-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Coles CD, Brown RT, Smith IE, Platzman KA, Erickson S, Falek A. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure at school age. I. Physical and cognitive development. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 1991;13:357–367. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(91)90084-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Coles CD, Platzman KA, Raskind-Hood CL, Brown RT, Falek A, Smith IE. A comparison of children affected by prenatal alcohol exposure and attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1997;20:150–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Coles CD, Platzman KA, Lynch ME, Freides D. Auditory and visual sustained attention in adolescents prenatally exposed to alcohol. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2002;26:263–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Coles CD, Lynch ME, Kable JA, Johnson KC, Goldstein FC. Verbal and nonverbal memory in adults prenatally exposed to alcohol. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2010;34(5):897–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01162.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Croxford J, Viljoen D. Alcohol consumption by pregnant women in the Western Cape. South African Medical Journal. 1999;89:962–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dehaene S, Cohen L. Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition. 1995;1:83–120. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2003;20:487–506. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dehaene S, Molko N, Cohen L, Wilson AJ. Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004;14:218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Dikranian K, Qin YQ, Labruyere J, Nemmers B, Olney JW. Ethanol-induced neuroapoptosis in the developing rodent cerebellum and related brain structures. Developmental Brain Research. 2005;155:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Diwadkar V, Meintjes EM, Goradia D, Dodge NC, Warton C, Molteno C, et al. Children with FAS and PFAS recruit different working memory brain regions than alcohol-exposed nonsyndromal children. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. :35. in press. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dunty WC, Chen S-Y, Zucker RM, Dehart DB, Sulik KK. Selective vulnerability of embryonic cell populations to ethanol-induced apoptosis: implications for alcohol-related birth defects and neurodevelopmental disorder. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2001;25:1523–1535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Eger E, Sterzer P, Russ MO, Giraud AL, Kleinschmidt A. A supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron. 2003;37:719–725. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fletcher PC, Shallice T, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ. Brain activity during memory retrieval—the influence of imagery and semantic cueing. Brain. 1996;119:1587–1596. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.5.1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Frings M, Gaertner K, Buderath P, Gerwig M, Christiansen H, Schoch B, et al. Timing of conditioned eyeblink responses is impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Experimental Brain Research. 2010;201:167–176. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fryer SL, Tapert SF, Mattson SN, Paulus MP, Spadoni AD, Riley EP. Prenatal alcohol exposure affects frontal-striatal BOLD response during inhibitory control. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007;31:1415–1424. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fryer SL, Schweinsburg BC, Bjorkquist OA, Frank LR, Mattson SN, Spadoni AD, et al. Characterization of white matter microstructure in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2009;33:514–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00864.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Geinisman Y, Berry RW, Disterhoft JF, Power JM, Van der Zee EA. Associative learning elicits the formation of multiple-synapse boutons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21:5568–5573. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05568.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Goldschmidt L, Richardson GA, Stoffer DS, Geva D, Day NL. Prenatal alcohol exposure and academic achievement at age six: a nonlinear fit. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1996;20:763–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Goodlett CR, Marcussen BL, West JR. A single day of alcohol exposure during the brain growth spurt induces brain weight restriction and cerebellar Purkinje loss. Alcohol. 1990;7:107–114. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(90)90070-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;160:636–645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gould E, Beylin A, Tanapat P, Reeves A, Shors TJ. Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2:260–265. doi: 10.1038/6365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Green JT, Rogers RF, Goodlett CR, Steinmetz JE. Impairment in eyeblink classical conditioning in adult rats exposed to ethanol as neonates. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2000;24:438–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Green JT, Johnson TB, Goodlett CR, Steinmetz JE. Eyeblink classical conditioning and interpositus nucleus activity are disrupted in adult rats exposed to ethanol as neonates. Learning & Memory. 2002a;9:304–320. doi: 10.1101/lm.47602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Green JT, Tran T, Steinmetz JE, Goodlett CR. Neonatal ethanol produces cerebellar deep nuclear loss and correlated disruption of eyeblink conditioning in adult rats. Brain Research. 2002b;956:302–311. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03561-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gruber O, Indefrey P, Steinmetz H, Kleinschmidt A. Dissociating neural correlates of cognitive components in mental calculation. Cerebral Cortex. 2001;11:350–359. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.4.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Guerri C, Pascual M, Renau-Piqueras J. Glia and fetal alcohol syndrome. Neurotoxicology. 2001;22:593–599. doi: 10.1016/s0161-813x(01)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hamre KM, West JR. The effects of the timing of ethanol exposure during the brain growth spurt on the number of cerebellar Purkinje and granule cell nuclear profiles. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1993;17:610–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Herbert JS, Eckerman CO, Stanton ME. The ontogeny of human learning in delay, long-delay, and trace eyeblink conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2003;117:1196–1210. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Holzman C, Paneth N, Little R, Pinto-Martin J. Perinatal brain injury in premature infants born to mothers using alcohol in pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1995;95:66–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Howell KK, Lynch ME, Platzman KA, Smith GH, Coles CD. Prenatal alcohol exposure and ability, academic achievement, and school functioning in adolescence: a longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2006;311:16–126. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hoyme HE, May PA, Kalberg WO, Kodituwakku P, Gossage JP, Trujillo PM, et al. A practical clinical approach to diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: clarification of the 1996 Institute of Medicine criteria. Pediatrics. 2005;115:39–47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ivkovich D, Stanton ME. Effects of early hippocampal lesions on trace, delay, and long-delay eyeblink conditioning in developing rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2001;76:426–446. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ivkovich D, Paczkowski CM, Stanton ME. Ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat. Developmental Psychobiology. 2000;36:148–160. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(200003)36:2<148::aid-dev6>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ivry RB, Justus TC, Middleton C. The cerebellum, timing, and language: Implications for the study of dyslexia. In: Wolf M, editor. Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. York Press; Timonium: 2001. pp. 189–211. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jacobson SW, Jacobson JL, Sokol RJ, Ager JW. Prenatal alcohol exposure and infant information processing ability. Child Development. 1993;64:1706–1721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Jacobson SW, Jacobson JL, Sokol RJ. Effects of fetal alcohol exposure on infant reaction time. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1994;18:1125–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jacobson SW, Chiodo LM, Sokol RJ, Jacobson JL. Validity of maternal report of prenatal alcohol, cocaine, and smoking in relation to neurobehavioral outcome. Pediatrics. 2002a;109:815–825. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Jacobson SW, Hay A, Molteno C, Marais AS, Carter RC, September M, et al. FAS and neurobehavioral deficits in alcohol-exposed South African infants. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2002b;26:175A. [Google Scholar]
  72. Jacobson SW, Jacobson JL, Sokol RJ, Chiodo LM, Corobana R. Maternal age, alcohol abuse history, and quality of parenting as moderators of the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on 7.5-year intellectual function. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2004;28:1732–1745. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000145691.81233.fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, Molteno CD, Odendaal H. A prospective examination of the incidence of heavy drinking during pregnancy among Cape Coloured South African women. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2006a;30:233A. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jacobson SW, Carr LG, Croxford J, Sokol RJ, Li T-K, Jacobson JL. Protective effects of the alcohol dehydrogenase-ADH1B allele in African American children exposed to alcohol during pregnancy. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2006b;148:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Jacobson SW, Stanton ME, Molteno CD, Burden MJ, Fuller DS, Hoyme HE, et al. Impaired eyeblink conditioning in children with fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2008;32:365–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, Dodge NC, Klorman R, Burden MJ. Number processing in adolescents with prenatal alcohol exposure and ADHD: differences in the neurobehavioral phenotype. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2011a;35:431–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01360.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Jacobson SW, Stanton ME, Dodge NC, Fuller DS, Molteno CD, Meintjes EM, et al. Impaired short delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in school-age children with fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2011b;35:250–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01341.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jirikowic TL, McCoy SW, Price R, Dellon B, Vilnai AL, Ciol M, et al. Taking the new step: Innovative interventions for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Emory University; Atlanta, GA: 2010. Sensorimotor Training to Affect Balance Engagement and Learning (STABEL) [Google Scholar]
  79. Jones KL, Smith DW. Recognition of the fetal alcohol syndrome in early infancy. Lancet. 1973;2:999–1001. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kable JA, Coles CD, Taddeo E. Socio-cognitive habilitation using the math interactive learning experience program for alcohol-affected children. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007;31:1425–1434. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kaemingk KL, Mulvaney S, Halverson PT. Learning following prenatal alcohol exposure: performance on verbal and visual multitrial tasks. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2003;18:33–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kaufman L, Koppelstaetter F, Siedentopf C, Haala I, Haberlandt E, Zimmerhackl L, et al. Neural correlates of the number-size interference task in children. Neuroreport. 2006;17:587–591. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kawashima R, Taira M, Okita K, Inoue K, Tajima N, Yoshida H, et al. A functional MRI study of simple arithmetic—a comparison between children and adults. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004;18:225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kerns KA, Don A, Mateer CA, Streissguth AP. Cognitive deficits in nonretarded adults with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1997;30:685–693. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning. Trends in Neuroscience. 1997;20:177–181. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kim JJ, Clark RE, Thompson RF. Hippo-campectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1995;109:195–203. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.109.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kirschen MP, Chen SHA, Schraedley-Desmond P, Desmond JE. Load- and practice-dependent increases in cerebro-cerebellar activation in verbal working memory: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005;24:462–472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Klingenberg CP, Wetherill L, Rogers J, Moore E, Ward R, Autti-Ramo I, et al. Prenatal alcohol exposure alters the patterns of facial asymmetry. Alcohol. 2010;44:649–657. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Klintsova AY, Cowell RM, Swain RA, Napper RMA, Goodlett CR, Greenough WT. Therapeutic effects of complex motor training on motor performance deficits induced by neonatal binge-like alcohol exposure in rats: I. Behavioral results. Brain Research. 1998;800:48–61. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kodituwakku PW, Kodituwakku EL. From research to practice: An integrative framework for the development of interventions for children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Neuropsychology Review. 2011:21. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9170-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kodituwakku PW, Handmaker NS, Cutler SK, Weathersby EK, Handmaker SD. Specific impairments in self-regulation in children exposed to alcohol prenatally. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1995;19:1558–1564. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Koekkoek SKE, Hulscher HC, Dortland BR, Hensbroek RA, Elgersma Y, Ruigrok TJH, et al. Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. Science. 2003;301:1736–1739. doi: 10.1126/science.1088383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kooistra L, Crawford S, Gibbard B, Ramage B, Kaplan BJ. Differentiating attention deficits in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder or attention-deficit–hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2010;52:205–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kopera-Frye K, Dehaene S, Streissguth AP. Impairments of number processing induced by prenatal alcohol exposure. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34:1187–1196. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00043-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Krupa DJ, Thompson JK, Thompson RF. Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. Science. 1993;260:989–991. doi: 10.1126/science.8493536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kucian K, Loenneker T, Dietrich T, Dosch M, Martin E, von Aster M. Impaired neural networks for approximate calculation in dyscalculic children: a functional MRI study. Behavioral Brain Functions. 2006;2:31–48. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lavond DG, Steinmetz JE. Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex. Behavioral Brain Research. 1989;33:113–164. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lavond DG, Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Mammalian brain substrates of aversive classical conditioning. Annual Reviews in Psychology. 1993;44:317–342. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Lebel C, Rasmussen C, Wyper K, Walker L, Andrew G, Yager J, et al. Brain diffusion abnormalities in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2008;22:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Lebel C, Rasmussen C, Wyper K, Andrew G, Beaulieu C. Brain microstructure is related to math ability in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2010;34:354–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lebel C, Roussotte F, Sowell ER. Imaging the impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on the structure of the developing brain. Neuropsychology Review. 2011:21. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9163-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lemoine P, Harousseau H, Borteyru JP, Menuet JC. Les enfants de parents alcooliques: anomalies observées. A propos de 127 cas [Children of alcoholic parents: abnormalities observed in 127 cases] Ouest Medical. 1968;21:476–482. [Google Scholar]
  103. Li L, Coles CD, Lynch ME, Hu X. Voxelwise and skeleton-based region of interest analysis of fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in young adults. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30:3265–3274. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Logan CG, Grafton ST. Functional anatomy of human eyeblink conditioning determined with regional cerebral glucose metabolism and positron-emission tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:7500–7504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Ma X, Coles CD, Lynch ME, LaConte SM, Zurkiya O, Wang D, et al. Evaluation of corpus callosum anisotropy in young adults with fetal alcohol syndrome according to diffusion tensor imaging. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005;29:1214–1222. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000171934.22755.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Maier SE, West JR. Regional differences in cell loss associated with binge-like alcohol exposure during the first two trimesters equivalent in the rat. Alcohol. 2001;23:49–57. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(00)00133-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Maier SE, Miller JA, Blackwell JM, West JR. Fetal alcohol exposure and temporal vulnerability: regional differences in cell loss as a function of the timing of binge-like alcohol exposure during brain development. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1999;23:726–734. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Marcussen BL, Goodlett CR, Mahoney JC, West JR. Developing rat Purkinje cells are more vulnerable to alcohol-induced depletion during differentiation than during neurogenesis. Alcohol. 1994;11:147–156. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(94)90056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Markham MR, Miller WR, Arciniega L. BaCCus 2.01 computer software for quantifying alcohol consumption. Behavioral Research Methods: Instruments and Computers. 1993;25:420–421. [Google Scholar]
  110. Mattson SN, Roebuck TM. Acquisition and retention of verbal and nonverbal information in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2002;26:875–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Mattson SN, Riley EP, Delis DC, Stern C, Jones KL. Verbal learning and memory in children with fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1996;20:810–816. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb05256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mattson SN, Goodman AM, Caine C, Delis DC, Riley EP. Executive functioning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1999;23:1808–1815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mattson SN, Crocker N, Nguyen TT. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: Neuropsychological and behavioral features. Neuropsychology Review. 2011:21. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9167-9. doi:10.1007/s11065-011-9167-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. May PA, Brooke L, Gossage JP, Croxford J, Adnams C, Jones KL, et al. Epidemiology of fetal alcohol syndrome in a South African community in the Western Cape Province. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:1905–1912. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. McCormick DA, Thompson RF. Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;4:2811–2822. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-11-02811.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. McEchron MD, Disterhoft JF. Sequence of single neuron changes in CA1 hippocampus of rabbits during acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioned responses. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1997;78:1030–1044. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. McGlinchey-Berroth R, Carillo MC, Gabrieli JDE, Brawn CM, Disterhoft JF. Impaired trace eyeblink conditioning in bilateral, medial-temporal lobe amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1997;111:873–882. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.111.5.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. McGlinchey-Berroth R, Brawn C, Disterhoft JF. Temporal discrimination learning in severe amnesic patients reveals an alteration in the timing of eyeblink conditioned responses. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1999;113:10–18. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Meintjes EM, Jacobson SW, Molteno CD, Gatenby JC, Warton C, Cannistraci CJ, et al. An fMRI study of number processing in children. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010a;28:351–362. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Meintjes EM, Jacobson SW, Molteno CD, Gatenby JC, Warton C, Cannistraci CJ, et al. An fMRI study of number processing in children with fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2010b;34:1450–1464. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Menon V, Rivera SM, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL. Dissociating prefrontal and parietal cortex activation during arithmetic processing. Neuroimage. 2000;12:357–365. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Mick E, Biederman J, Faraone SV, Sayer J, Kleinman S. Case-control study of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and maternal smoking, alcohol use, and drug use during pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2002;41:378–385. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200204000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Miller MW, Al-Rabiai S. Effects of prenatal exposure to ethanol on the number of axons in the pyramidal tract of the rat. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1994;18:346–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Miller MW, Robertson S. Prenatal exposure to ethanol alters the postnatal development and transformation of radial glia to astrocytes in the cortex. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1993;337:253–266. doi: 10.1002/cne.903370206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Miller MJ, Chen N, Li L, Tom B, Weiss C, Disterhoft JF, et al. FMRI of the conscious rabbit during unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning reveals bilateral cerebellar activation. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23:11753–11758. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-37-11753.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Miller LC, Chan W, Litvinova A, Rubin A, Comfort K, Tirella L, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in children residing in Russian orphanages: a phenotypic survey. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2006;30:531–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Mix K, Huttenlocher J, Levine S. Math without words: Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. Oxford University Press; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  128. Molchan SE, Sunderland T, McIntosh AR, Herscovitch P, Schreurs BG. A functional anatomical study of associative learning in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:8122–8126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Molteno CD, Bromley K, Thomas KGF, Meintjes EM, Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Role of processing speed in fetal alcohol impairment of reading comprehension. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. :35. in press. [Google Scholar]
  130. Moore E, Ward R, Wetherill LF, Rogers JL, Autti-Ramo I, Fagerlund A, et al. Unique facial features distinguish fetal alcohol syndrome patients and controls in diverse ethnic populations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007;31:1707–1713. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00472.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Moyer JR, Deyo RA, Disterhoft JF. Hippo-campectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1990;104:243–252. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.104.2.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Moyer JR, Thompson LT, Disterhoft JF. Trace eyeblink conditioning increases CA1 excitability in a transient and learning-specific manner. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16:5536–5546. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05536.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Naccache L, Dehaene S. The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cerebral Cortex. 2001;11:966–974. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.10.966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. O’Hare ED, Lu LH, Houston SM, Bookheimer SY, Mattson SN, O’Connor MJ, et al. Altered frontal-parietal functioning during verbal working memory in children and adolescents with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30:3200–3208. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. O’Leary CE, Thomas KGF, Molteno CD, Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Verbal learning and memory in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Findings from Cape Town and Detroit. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 35 doi: 10.1111/acer.12671. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Ohyama T, Nores WL, Murphy M, Mauk MD. What the cerebellum computes. Trends in Neuroscience. 2003;26:222–227. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Perrett SP, Ruiz BP, Mauk MD. Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1993;13:1708–1718. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01708.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Pesenti M, Thioux M, Seron X, De Volder A. Neuroanatomical substrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison, and simple addition: a PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;12:461–479. doi: 10.1162/089892900562273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Pinel P, Piazza M, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S. Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuroimage. 2004;41:983–993. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Port RL, Romano AG, Steinmetz JE, Mikhail AA, Patterson MM. Retention and acquisition of classical trace conditioned responses by rabbits with hippocampal lesions. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1986;100:745–752. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.5.745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Power JM, Thompson LT, Moyer JM, Disterhoft JF. Enhanced synaptic transmission in CA1 hippocampus after eyeblink conditioning. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1997;78:1184–1187. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Rasmussen C, Bisanz J. Exploring mathematics difficulties in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Child Development Perspectives. 2009;3:125–130. [Google Scholar]
  143. Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2004;306:443–447. doi: 10.1126/science.1100301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Ross SM, Ross LE. Comparison of trace and delay classical eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971;91:165–167. doi: 10.1037/h0031823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Santhanam P, Li Z, Hu X, Lynch ME, Coles CD. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on brain activation during an arithmetic task: an fMRI study. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2009;33:1901–1908. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01028.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Schreurs BG, Mcintosh AR, Bahro M, Herscovitch P, Sunderland T, Molchan SE. Lateralization and behavioral correlation of changes in regional cerebral blood flow with classical conditioning of the human eyeblink response. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1997;77:2153–2163. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Shors TJ, Miesegaes G, Beylin A, Zhao M, Rydel T, Gould E. Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature. 2001;410:372–376. doi: 10.1038/35066584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Simon O, Mangin JF, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S. Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron. 2002;33:475–487. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00575-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Sokol R, Martier S, Ernhart C. Identification of alcohol abuse in the prenatal clinic. In: Chang NC, Chao HM, editors. Early identification of alcohol abuse. Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Research Monograph No. 17; Rockville, MD: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  150. Solomon PR, Vander Schaaf ER, Thompson RF, Weisz DJ. Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit’s classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1986;100:729–744. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.5.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Sowell ER, Mattson SN, Thompson PM, Jernigan TL, Riley EP, Toga AW. Mapping callosal morphology and cognitive correlates: effects of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Neurology. 2001a;57:235–244. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Mattson SN, Tessner KD, Jernigan TL, Riley EP, et al. Voxel-based morphometric analyses of the brain in children and adolescents prenatally exposed to alcohol. Neuroreport. 2001b;12:515–523. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200103050-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Mattson SN, Tessner KD, Jernigan TL, Riley EP, et al. Regional brain shape abnormalities persist into adolescence after heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Cerebral Cortex. 2002;12:856–865. doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.8.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sowell ER, Mattson SN, Kan E, Thompson PM, Riley ER, Toga AW. Abnormal cortical thickness and brain-behavior correlation patterns in individuals with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Cerebral Cortex. 2008a;18:126–144. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Sowell ER, Johnson A, Kan E, Lu LH, Van Horn JD, Toga AW, et al. Mapping white matter integrity and neurobehavioral correlates in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008b;28:1313–1319. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5067-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Spottiswoode BS, Meintjes EM, Anderson AW, Molteno CD, Stanton ME, Dodge NC, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the cerebellum and eyeblink conditioning in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01566.x. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Stanton ME. Multiple memory systems, development, and conditioning. Behavioral Brain Research. 2000;110:25–37. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Stanton ME, Freeman JH. Eyeblink conditioning in the developing rat: an animal model of learning in developmental neurotoxicology. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1994;102:131–139. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Stanton ME, Freeman JH. Developmental studies of eyeblink conditioning in the rat. In: Woodruff-Pak DS, Steinmetz JH, editors. Eyeblink classical conditioning, vol. 2, animal models. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Boston: 2000. pp. 17–49. [Google Scholar]
  160. Stanton ME, Goodlett CR. Neonatal ethanol exposure impairs eyeblink conditioning in weanling rats. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1998;22:270–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Stanton ME, Claflin DI, Herbert JS. Ontogeny of multiple memory systems: Eyeblink conditioning in rodents and humans. In: Blumberg MS, Freeman JH, Robinson SR, editors. Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience. Oxford University Press; New York: 2010. pp. 501–526. [Google Scholar]
  162. Steinmetz JE. Brain substrates of classical eyeblink conditioning: a highly localized but also distributed system. Behavioural Brain Research. 2000;110:13–24. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Sternberg S. High speed scanning in human memory. Science. 1966;153:652–654. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3736.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Stratton K, Howe C, Battaglia F. Fetal alcohol syndrome: Diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  165. Streissguth AP, Barr HM, Sampson PD. Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure: effects on child IQ and learning problems at age 7 1/2 years. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1990;14:662–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1990.tb01224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Streissguth AP, Aase JM, Clarren SK, Randels SP, LaDue RA, Smith DF. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome in adolescents and adults. JAMA. 1991;265:1961–1967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Streissguth AP, Barr HM, Carmichael-Olson H, Sampson PD, Bookstein FL, Burgess DM. Drinking during pregnancy decreases Word Attack and Arithmetic scores on standardized tests: adolescent data from a population-based prospective study. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1994;18:248–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Temple E, Posner MI. Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:7836–7841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Thomas JD, Goodlett CR, West JR. Alcohol-induced Purkinje cell loss depends on developmental timing of alcohol exposure and correlates with motor performance. Developmental Brain Research. 1998;105:159–166. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(97)00164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Thompson RF. The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science. 1986;233:941–947. doi: 10.1126/science.3738519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Thompson RF. In search of memory traces. Annual Reviews in Psychology. 2005;56:1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Van der Zee E, Kronforst-Collins MA, Maizels ET, Hunziger-Dunn M, Disterhoft JF. Gammaisoform-selective changes in PKC immunoreactivity after trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1997;7:271–285. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:3<271::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Vaurio L, Riley EP, Mattson SM. Differences in executive functioning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure or attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2008;14:119–129. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Venkatraman V, Ansari D, Chee MWL. Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43:744–753. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Wager TD, Smith EE. Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2003;3:255–274. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.4.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Watari H, Born DE, Gleason CA. Effects of first trimester binge alcohol exposure on developing white matter in fetal sheep. Pediatric Research. 2006;59:560–564. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000203102.01364.de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Weiss C, Kronforst-Collins MA, Disterhoft JF. Activity of hippocampal pyramidal neurons during trace eyeblink conditioning. Hippocampus. 1996;6:192–209. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1996)6:2<192::AID-HIPO9>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Weiss C, Bouwmeester H, Power JM, Disterhoft JF. Hippocampal lesions prevent trace eyeblink conditioning inthe freelymovingrat. Behavioral Brain Research. 1999;99:123–132. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Werden D, Ross LE. A comparison of the trace and delay classical conditioning performance of normal children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1972;14:126–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(72)90037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Willford JA, Richardson GA, Leech SL, Day NL. Verbal and visuospatial learning and memory function in children with moderate prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2004;28:497–507. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000117868.97486.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Woodruff-Pak DS, Disterhoft JF. Where is the trace in trace conditioning? Trends in Neuroscience. 2008;31:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Woodruff-Pak DS, Steinmetz JE. Eyeblink classical conditioning: Volume I—Applications in humans. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Boston: 2000a. [Google Scholar]
  183. Woodruff-Pak DS, Steinmetz JE. Eyeblink classical conditioning: Volume II—Applications in animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Boston: 2000b. [Google Scholar]
  184. Wozniak JR, Muetzel RL. What does diffusion tensor imaging reveal about the brain and cognition in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders? Neuropsychology Review. 2011;21 doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9162-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Wozniak JR, Mueller BA, Chang P, Muetzel RL, Caros L, Lim KO. Diffusion tensor imaging in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2006;30:1799–1806. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00213.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Wozniak JR, Muetzel RL, Mueller BA, McGee CL, Freerks MA, Ward EE, et al. Microstructural corpus callosum anomalies in children with prenatal alcohol exposure: an extension of previous diffusion tensor imaging findings. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2009;30:1825–1835. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01021.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wynn K. Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature. 1992;358:749–750. doi: 10.1038/358749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Wynn K. Origins of numerical knowledge. Mathematical Cognition. 1995;1:35–60. [Google Scholar]
  189. Wynn K. Infants’ individuation and enumeration of sequential actions. Psychological Science. 1996;7:164–169. [Google Scholar]
  190. Wynn K, Chiang WC. Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects: the case of magical appearance. Psychological Science. 1998;9:448, 455. [Google Scholar]
  191. Wynn K, Bloom P, Chiang WC. Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infant. Cognition. 2002;83:B55–B62. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Zago L, Pesenti M, Mellet E, Crivello F, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Neural correlates of simple and complex mental calculation. Neuroimage. 2001;13:314–327. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Zago L, Petit L, Turbelin M, Andersson F, Vigneau M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:2403–2414. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Zoeller RT, Butnariu OV, Fletcher DL, Riley EP. Limited postnatal ethanol exposure permanently alters the expression of mRNAS encoding myelin basic protein and myelin-associated glycoprotein in cerebellum. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1994;18:909–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES