Abstract
To identify the ligands for σ1 receptors that are potent and selective, the analogues of prezamicol and trozamicol scaffolds of carbonyl-containing vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) inhibitors were explored. Of the 23 analogues synthesized and tested, 5 displayed very high affinity for σ1 (Ki = 0.48 - 4.05 nM) and high selectivity for σ1 relative to σ2 receptors (σ1/σ2 selectivity >749-fold). Four of the five compounds (14a, 14b, 14c and 14e) showed very low affinity for VAChT (Ki >290 nM) and the fifth compound (14g) showed moderate affinity for VAChT (Ki = 44.2 nM). The compound [1'-(4-fluorobenzyl)-3'-hydroxy[1,4']bipiperidinyl-4-yl]-(4-fluorophenyl)-methanone (14a) displayed very high affinity and selectivity for σ1 receptor (Ki = 0.48 nM, σ1/σ2 >3600). All four of these most promising compounds (14a, 14b, 14c and 14e) can be radiosynthesized with fluorine-18 or carbon-11, which will allow further evaluation of their properties as PET probes for imaging σ1 receptor in vivo.
Keywords: σ1 receptor, VAChT, PET imaging, structure-activity relationship
1. Introduction
Sigma (σ) receptors were discovered in the 1970s,1 and they were found to exhibit σ1 and σ2 subtypes.2, 3 Instead of opioid receptors as originally thought, they now are widely accepted as unique and independent.4 The σ1 receptor shares no homology with other mammalian proteins5 and consists of 223 amino acids. It has been cloned and functionally expressed.6 The σ2 receptor has not been cloned, and its structure has not been identified yet.7
Studies discovered that σ1 receptors are highly expressed in the brain and several peripheral organs that include heart, spleen, kidney, liver, lung, ovary, testes, and placenta.8, 9 The σ1 receptors are located in cytoplasmic, endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondrial membranes.9 During development, elevated levels of σ1 receptors were found in the embryonic stem cells at all stages of embryogenesis.9 In the central nervous system (CNS), the highest level of σ1 transcripts is expressed in various cranial nerve nuclei, followed by mesencephalic structures that include red nucleus, periaqueductal gray matter and substantia nigra, and in some diencephalic structures that include habenula and arcuate, and paraventricular and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei. Moderate levels of σ1 transcripts were found in superficial and deeper cortical laminar layers, and mRNA of σ1 receptor is found in the pyramidal cell layer and the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus formation.10 Also in the brain, thalamus and amygdaloid body express σ1 receptor.10
Investigations have revealed that σ1 receptor is involved in different functions associated with the central nervous, endocrine, motor and immune systems.11, 12 In the central nervous system, σ1 receptor regulates neurotransmitter release, modulation of neurotransmitter receptor functions, learning and memory, and movement and posture control. Based on its broad modulatory effects,13 the σ1 receptor is believed to play an important role in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases.14-16 Recent studies have shown that several σ1 receptor agonists have positive therapeutic effects on diseases such as schizophrenia,17 major depression,16 Alzheimer's disease (AD),18 and substance abuse.19 Thus, σ1 receptors are now considered as a therapeutic target for the treatment of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.20-22
Studies of cancer have revealed that σ1 receptors are overexpressed in breast cancer, small cell and non-small cell lung carcinoma, renal carcinoma, colon carcinoma, sarcoma, brain tumors, melanoma, glioblastoma, neuroblastoma, and prostate cancers.23-26 Based on the expression pattern of σ1 receptors in numerous tumors, ligands for these receptors have potential for both imaging and therapy.27 Administration of σ ligands inhibits ex vivo growth of tumor cells derived from human mammary adenocarcinoma, colon carcinoma, and melanoma.28, 29 For example, the σ1 receptor ligand rimcazole inhibits cellular proliferation and induces cell death, although the mechanism is not clear.30
The σ1 receptor regulates the activity of diverse ion channels via protein-protein interactions, exhibits stereo-selective drug binding, and binds different types of drugs that exhibit structural diversity.31-33 The activation of σ1 receptors promotes both neuronal differentiation and anti-apoptotic action, potentially leading to cancer. The σ1 receptor is a ligand-regulated mitochondrial membrane-associated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein receptor. σ1 receptor ligands as potential therapeutic drugs may lead to decreased oxidative stress in mammalian cells, and may have antitumorigenic activity.30 Specific σ1 ligands that have high specific binding and suitable pharmaceutical properties may be potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer.29, 34 Although the importance of σ1 receptor in CNS disorders and cancer is recognized, details of the pathophysiological functions of σ1 receptor in brain are still not clear.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an elegant non-invasive imaging modality that can provide functional information about cellular processes. It has been used to quantify the density of σ1 receptors in brain in vivo. A suitable clinical PET probe targeting the σ1 receptors will advance our understanding of the functions of σ1 receptors in the CNS and allow monitoring of the efficacy of disease treatment with σ1 ligands.35 Investigators have put tremendous efforts to identify PET probes for imaging σ1 in vivo.36-39 To date, the 11C-labeled PET radiotracer [11C]SA4503 is the only PET probe for imaging σ1 receptor in neurological applications.40, 41 Compared to 11C (t1/2 = 20.4 min), 18F has a longer half-life (t1/2 = 109.8 min) that places fewer time constraints on radiotracer synthesis and permits longer scan sessions usually resulting in higher target/non-target ratios. However, there is no report of an 18F-labeled probe for the σ1 receptor that is clinically suitable.17 Identifying such a clinically suitable probe is imperative for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in CNS disorders and cancer.
In the search of highly selective and clinically suitable σ1 ligands, investigations have revealed that high affinity σ1 ligands must contain a basic amine having two hydrophobic appendages.7, 42 Structure-activity relationship analysis of vesamicol ligands (Figure 1), which bind to the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) in presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals, showed that many vesamicol ligands contain a pharmacophore that also have high affinity for σ1 receptors.43 In fact, some of the VAChT ligands show moderate to high binding affinities for σ1 receptor. As shown in Figure 1, (-)-vasamicol (1) has moderate σ1 receptor binding affinity value of 73.8 nM,44 and its methyl substituted derivative (-)-p-methylvesamicol (2) has high σ1 receptor binding affinity value of 8.10 nM;44 the trozamicol analogues meta-iodobenzyltrozamicol (3) and-(+)-4-fluorobenzyltrozamicol (4) have σ1 receptor binding affinity values of 92 and 21.6 nM respectively.43, 45 Several carbonyl containing VAChT analogues also bind to σ1 very well; for example, the binding affinity of (1S,2S)-2-(4-(5-iodothiophen-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl)cyclohexanol (5) was high with a Ki value of 9.39 nM for σ1 receptors.46 To identify new, highly selective ligands for σ1 receptors, our strategies are to (1) replace the 4-phenylpiperidinyl group in prezamicol structure with a 4-substituted benzoylpiperidinyl group which is known to favor σ receptors,46 (2) alkylate or acylate the secondary amine in (3'-hydroxy-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone structurally similar to the prezamicol scaffold, and (3) alkylate the secondary amine in (4'-hydroxy-1,3'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone, which is structurally similar to the trozamicol scaffold. In the current paper, we detail our exploration of these new compounds to identify the ligands that have high affinity for σ1 receptors and selectivity for σ1 versus σ2 receptors. This investigation was inspired by 1) the observation that σ1 receptor ligands may be potential therapeutic drugs for the treatment of neurological disorders4 and cancer,34 and 2) the need for highly selective and potent σ1 receptor ligands that can be labeled with F-18 or C-11. Moreover, a novel clinical PET probe for imaging the σ1 receptor will provide a unique tool to assess the relationship between changes in σ1 receptors in the brain during the progression of CNS disorders and provide a useful tool to monitor the treatment efficacy of the CNS disorders and cancer.
Figure 1.
Representative structures which are potent for σ1 receptors
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The target compounds were synthesized as depicted in Schemes 1–3. The synthesis started with 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, in which the secondary amine was first protected by reacting with benzoyl chloride to form benzamide 10. The alkenyl double bond of compound 10 was oxidized by meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) to form epoxide 11. The epoxide 11 was refluxed with substituted 4-benzoylpiperidine hydrochloride salts, namely, either 4-(4'-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine hydrochloride or 4-(4'-methoxybenzoyl)piperidine hydrochloride, in ethanol with triethylamine as the base to afford tertiary amino alcohol intermediates. To improve the yield, commercially available 4'-substituted 4-benzoylpiperidine hydrochloride salts were used in excess and the reaction temperature was kept below 75 °C. This reaction condition afforded (3'-hydroxy-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone intermediates and their regioisomers, (4'-hydroxy-1,3'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone intermediates. The separation of these regioisomers by silica gel chromatography was difficult. To overcome the difficulty, the mixture of regioisomers was reacted with acetic anhydride to convert the free hydroxyl group to the corresponding acetates 12a–d. Subsequently, 12a and 12b were separated easily by silica gel chromatography.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of compounds 13a-d
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of compounds 16a-h
Under strongly acidic conditions, hydrolysis of 12a and 12b to remove both the acetyl and benzoyl groups afforded key intermediates 13a and 13b. A similar procedure was used to make corresponding regioisomers 13c and 13d. Intermediates 13a and 13c are similar in structure to prezamicol, and 13b and 13d are similar in structure to trozamicol (Scheme 1). Starting with key intermediates 13a and 13c, the target compounds 14a–h were obtained via N-alkylation with various substituted benzyl halides in yields ranging from 34% to 84%. To assign the regio- and relative stereochemistry of the compounds obtained in the oxirane ring opening reaction, X-ray crystal structure of compound, 14c was carried out. The regiochemistry (the nitrogen of piperidine ring is on C13 and hydroxyl group on C17, Figure 2) was assigned based on the x-ray structure of 14c. The oxirane ring opening reaction was performed under the basic conditions. As predicted, the relative stereochemistry of the ring opening resulted in the trans stereochemistry (C13 and C17 in Figure 2). All the substituted benzyl halides were obtained commercially and were used in slight excess (Scheme 2). Target compounds 15a–g were obtained by coupling various substituted benzoic acids with piperidine intermediates 13a and c using bis(2-oxo-3-oxazolidinyl)phosphonic chloride (BOP-Cl) in yields ranging from 22% to 90%. Compounds 16a–h were synthesized by following the similar procedure to synthesize compounds 14a–h, except that the trozamicolanalogues 13b and 13d were utilized (Scheme 3). All the products were converted into oxalates for determining the bioactivity affinities.
Figure 2.
Chemical structure and x-ray crystal structure of 14c
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of compounds 14a-h and 15a-g
2.2. Biological binding affinity studies
The σ1 and 2σ binding affinities (Ki nM) of the new compounds were determined by using the competitive inhibition method with tritiated σ ligands according to reported procedures.7, 42 The σ1 binding sites were assayed by using guinea pig brain membranes with the selective radioligand (+)-[3H]pentazocine. The σ2 binding sites were assayed in rat liver membranes, a rich source of these sites, with [3H]DTG in the presence of (+)-pentazocine (100 nM) to mask σ1 sites. VAChT binding was assayed using highly expressed human VAChT assayed with homogenized and partially clarified PC12123.7 cells by displacement of bound 5 nM (-)-[3H]vesamicol. Apparent dissociation constants for binding of the novel compounds in vitro are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Affinities of new analogues for σ1 receptor, σ2 receptor, and VAChTa
| Compounds | σ1 (Ki, nM)b | σ2 (Ki, nM)c | VAChT (Ki, nM)d | Selective ratio of σ1 vs. σ2 | Selective ratio of σ1 vs. VAChT | LogPe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1f | 73.8 ± 11.2 | 346 ± 37 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.6 | 16.7 | 1.40 |
| 14a | 0.48 ± 0.14 | 1741 ± 286 | 1360 ± 295 | 3627 | 2833 | 2.83 |
| 14b | 4.03 ± 0.47 | 5521 ± 1352 | 3310 ± 907 | 1370 | 821 | 2.61 |
| 14c | 1.36 ± 0.28 | 2301 ± 249 | 401 ± 42.0 | 1692 | 295 | 2.73 |
| 14d | 22.8 ± 2.32 | 4208 ± 115 | 2030 ± 385 | 184 | 89 | 1.48 |
| 14e | 2.51 ± 0.34 | 2788 ± 718 | 294 ± 16.1 | 1111 | 117 | 2.82 |
| 14f | 25.9 ± 0.96 | 5157 ± 202 | 14800 ± 3460 | 199 | 569 | 2.61 |
| 14g | 4.05 ± 0.88 | 3033 ± 248 | 44.2 ± 3.03 | 749 | 11 | 2.72 |
| 14h | 59.64 ± 2.22 | 4540 ± 1606 | 137 ± 14.3 | 76 | 2.2 | 1.46 |
| 15a | 3144 ± 140 | 8642 ± 812 | 3600 ± 499 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 1.92 |
| 15b | 2238 ± 271 | >10000 | 30900 ± 6400 | > 4.5 | 14 | 2.25 |
| 15c | 2833 ± 374 | 20450 ± 4887 | 683 ± 90 | 7.2 | 0.24 | 1.67 |
| 15d | 7739 ± 662 | 13565 ± 1435 | 3340 ± 706 | 1.7 | 0.43 | 0.57 |
| 15e | 2088 ± 154 | 32850 ± 443 | 3460 ± 476 | 15.7 | 1.66 | 1.90 |
| 15f | 2061 ± 113 | 15862 ± 3045 | 555 ± 65.4 | 7.7 | 0.27 | 1.65 |
| 15g | 26646 ± 8738 | 17041 ± 8626 | 372 ± 65.7 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 0.56 |
| 16a | 50.0 ± 7.9 | 3443 ± 928 | 136 ± 13.8 | 69 | 2.72 | 1.98 |
| 16b | 91.1 ± 19.9 | 4979 ± 507 | 1970 ± 196 | 54 | 22 | 1.73 |
| 16c | 106 ± 28 | 832 ± 147 | 149 ± 22.5 | 7.8 | 1.4 | 1.88 |
| 16d | 1159 ± 128 | 13018 ± 2626 | 237 ± 41.4 | 11 | 0.20 | 0.79 |
| 16e | 137 ± 21 | 5598 ± 1033 | 48.6 ± 8.37 | 41 | 0.35 | 2.00 |
| 16f | 297 ± 27 | 4208 ± 439 | 1080 ± 296 | 14 | 3.6 | 1.75 |
| 16g | 208 ± 53 | 8539 ± 1900 | 35.5 ± 11.1 | 41 | 0.17 | 1.89 |
| 16h | 2225 ± 168 | 17135 ± 3863 | 107 ± 11 | 7.7 | 0.40 | 0.80 |
Ki values (mean ± SEM) were determined in at least three experiments.
The σ1 binding assay used membrane preparations of guinea pig brain.
The σ2 binding assay used homogenates of rat liver.
The VAChT binding assay used expressed human VAChT.
Calculated value at pH 7.4 by ACD/I-Lab, version 7.0. (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Canada).
Values from ref 44.
Binding affinity data identified a number of potentially useful structure-activity trends. First, these new analogues generally have very low affinity for σ2 receptors (Ki > 1000 nM). For VAChT, only compounds 14g, 16e, and 16g display moderate affinity of 44.2 ± 3.03, 48.6 ± 8.37, and 35.5 ± 11.1 nM. For the other ligands, the Ki values are greater than 100 nM. On the other hand, compounds 14a, 14b, 14c, 14e and 14g displayed very high affinity for σ1 receptor (Ki <5 nM) and very good selectivity for σ1 versus σ2 receptors (>1000 fold). Among these latter compounds, 14a displayed the highest affinity for σ1 receptors (Ki = 0.48 ± 0.14 nM), very high selectivity for σ1 versus σ2 receptors (>3000 fold), and for σ1 receptors vs VAChT (2800 fold). These results suggest that 14a has high potency and high selectivity for σ1 receptor.
More importantly, 14a has two fragments that contain a fluorine atom. One is in the para-position of the carbonyl group in 4-fluorobenzoylpiperidine fragment, which is easy to label by displacement of a nitro group with 18F-. The other fluorine atom is in the para-position of the 1-(4-fluorobenzyl)piperidin-3-ol fragment. The position of this fluorine atom allows incorporation of fluorine-18 in two steps. The first step is to make 4-[18F]fluorobenzyl iodide,47 and the second step is to make the final labeled radiotracer by N-alkylation of 13a with 4-[18F]fluorobenzyl iodide. Labeling 14a with fluorine-18 at different positions also provides a unique way to investigate the metabolic stability of 14a in vivo by determining which fragment of the structure contains the radioactivity from fluorine-18. This information will be very useful for guiding further structural optimization of 14a to identify a metabolically stable PET tracer favorable for clinical use. In addition, the moderate lipophilicity of 14a (Log P value = 2.83) suggests that compound 14a has good ability to enter into the brain and has high potential to be a suitable PET imaging probe or therapeutic agent for CNS disorders.
Comparing compounds 14a–h with 15a–g, N-benzyl substituted ligands displayed significantly higher binding affinities for σ receptors, particularly for σ1 receptor sites. Whereas, N-benzoyl substituted ligands displayed low binding affinities for σ receptor. For example, when the 4-fluorobenzoyl group in 15a was replaced by the 4-fluorobenzyl group in 14a, the σ1 receptor affinity had increased dramatically, changing the Ki value from 3144 nM for 15a to 0.48 nM for 14a. The same trend was observed in all other corresponding compounds. In general, compounds containing substituted benzyl groups preferred to bind to σ1 receptor sites; 14a–h, displayed very high σ1 binding affinities in which the Ki values ranged from 0.48 nM for 14a to 59.6 nM for 14h. However, compound 14g showed moderate VAChT binding affinity (44.2 ± 3.03 nM), whereas the other compounds 14a–f and 14h displayed lower VAChT binding affinities. The observation that compounds containing the substituted benzoyl groups 15a–g led to dramatic decrease in σ1 receptor binding affinities (Ki >1000 nM) is consistent with results reported in the literature.42 This confirms that a carbonyl group between the substituted aromatic ring and the piperidine moiety plays an important role by affecting σ1 receptor binding affinities. Incorporating the carbonyl group leads to more rigidity in the structure and might prevent the interaction of ligands with the σ1 receptor binding site.
When the electron-withdrawing group fluoride (14a–d) was replaced with the electron-donating group methoxy (14e–h) at the para-position of the 4-substitued benzoylpiperidine fragment, the σ1 binding affinities (nM) were decreased. For compounds 14a–d, σ1 binding affinities (nM) were 0.48 ± 0.14, 4.03 ± 0.47, 1.36 ± 0.28 and 22.8 ± 2.32 respectively; for compounds 14e–h, the σ1 binding affinities (nM) were 2.51 ± 0.34, 25.9 ± 0.96, 4.05 ± 0.88 and 59.64 ± 2.22 respectively. The decrease in affinity ranged from 2.6 fold for 14h vs. 14d to 6.4 fold for 14b vs. 14f.
Comparing the structures of 14a, 14b, and 14c, the only difference among them is the substitution at the para-position of the benzyl moiety on the terminal piperidine ring of (3'-hydroxy-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone. The σ1 Ki-values (nM) are displayed in the order of -F > -H > -OCH3 with the dissociation constant values being 0.48 ± 0.14 for 14a, 1.36 ± 0.28 for 14c and 4.03 ± 0.47 for 14b. Compared with 14b, incorporating an electron-withdrawing fluorine atom at the 4-position of the benzyl group (14a) diminished the basicity of the nitrogen atom in the terminal pipeidine ring and the ligand affinity for σ1 receptor was increased by 2.8 fold; on the contrary, incorporating an electron-donating methoxyl group (14b) enhanced the basicity of the nitrogen atom in the terminal pipeidine ring and the ligand affinity for σ1 receptor was decreased by approximately 3 fold. A similar trend was observed in 4-methoxybenzoyl containing compounds 14e, 14f and 14g. To further test the effect of the electron density on the benzyl ring, compounds 14d and 14h containing the relatively high electron-density pyridine ring, with the N-atom in the meta-position, were synthesized and screened. However, decrease in σ1 binding affinities was observed. For 14d, the σ1 binding affinity was decreased more than 17 fold as expressed by Ki value changing from 1.36 ± 0.28 nM for 14c to 22.8 ± 2.32 nM for 14d. For 14h, the σ1 binding affinity was decreased 15 fold as expressed by Ki value changing from 4.05 ± 0.88 nM for 14g to 59.64 ± 2.22 nM for 14h. To clearly understand how the electron density of the benzyl ring affects basicity of nitrogen atom in the piperidine rings resulted in the changes of σ1 binding affinity, further structure-affinity investigation of these analogues is necessary.
The compounds with prezamicol scaffold (14a–h) displayed substantially higher affinities for σ1 receptors than that of trozamicol scaffold (16a–h). The only structural difference between prezamicol and trozamicol is the position of the nitrogen atom in the terminal piperidine ring. Some trozamicol scaffold analogues displayed moderate σ1 receptor binding affinities, for example 16a (50.0 ± 7.9 nM) and 16b (91.1 ± 19.9 nM). The difference in binding affinities for prezamicol and trozamicol analogues is 11 fold for 14f vs. 16f (25.9 ± 0.96 nM vs. 297 ± 27 nM) and 104 fold for the most potent 14a vs. 16a (0.48 ± 0.14 nM vs. 50.0 ± 7.9 nM).
Since our initial in vitro screening showed compound 14a (Ki-σ1 = 0.48 ± 0.14 nM, 3627-fold for σ1 vs. σ2,-2833 fold for σ1 vs. VAChT) and 14e (Ki-σ1 = 2.51 ± 0.34 nM, 1111-fold for σ1 vs. σ2, 117-fold for σ1 vs. VAChT) had high binding specificity for σ1 receptors; both the compounds 14a and 14e will be easy to label with carbon-11 or fluorine-18 to test the feasibility of imaging σ1 receptors in animals. We also determined the D2 and D3 affinities for both 14a and 14e and 5-HT1A affinity for 14a. The in vitro binding data suggested that 14a and 14e had very low affinities for D2, D3 and 5HT1A as shown in Table 2. This observation eliminates the concern that D2, D3 and 5-HT1A receptor binding might interfere with the imaging signal when a C-11 or F-18 labeled ligands of 14a or 14e were used for PET imaging studies of the σ1 receptors in vivo.
Table 2.
D2, D3 and 5-HT1A Affinities (Ki ± SD, nM) of compound 14a and 14ea
Overall, (1) N-alkylation with benzyl groups of (3'-hydroxy-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone to form tertiary amines generally gives very high σ1 receptor binding affinities and high selectivity for σ1 receptor vs. σ2 receptor and VAChT sites, (2) N-acylation with benzoyl groups of (3'-hydroxy-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)(4-substituted phenyl)methanone to form tertiary amides diminishes the σ1 receptor binding affinity, and (3) prezamicol analogues display high σ1 receptor binding affinities, whereas, trozamicol analogues display moderate to low σ1 receptor binding affinities. Although it is well known that σ1 receptor distinguishes between enantiomers,31, 32 only racemic mixtures are used in this study. Further study will be focused on resolving the racemic mixtures to obtain enantiomeric isomers and conduct the binding affinity screening for the enantiomeric isomers. It is expected that enantiomers of compounds 14a–c and 14e will provide compounds with improved σ1 binding affinity and selectivity. In addition, the in vitro affinities of 14a and 14a-c and 14e binding to other neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, enzymes and ion channels will be performed to determine if 14a-c and 14e bind to σ1 receptor specifically.
3. Conclusion
In the present study, we synthesized a new class of compounds targeting σ1 receptors. In an effort to identify compounds that have high affinity and selectivity for σ1 receptors, we explored carbonyl containing VAChT inhibitors by introducing substituted benzyl or benzoyl groups on the nitrogen of the terminal piperidine ring. From this study, we have identified five racemic compounds, 14a (0.48 nM), 14b (4.03 nM), 14c (1.36 nM), 14e (2.51 nM), and 14g (4.05 nM), that have very high binding affinities for σ1 receptors. The first four compounds also displayed high selectivity for σ1 vs. σ2 receptors and do not bind well to VAChT. They have the potential to be useful pharmacological agents targeting σ1 receptors. More importantly, introducing fluorine-18 or carbon-11 isotopes into these compounds can be achieved easily. This accomplishment should permit further evaluation of these ligands to identify clinical PET probes for imaging σ1 receptors in human beings. Particularly for 14a and 14c, the σ1/σ2 ratios are greater than 3600 and 1600 fold and the σ1/VAChT ratios are greater than 2800 and 290 fold, respectively. After screening the in vitro binding affinities of 14a-c and 14e with other neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, enzymes and ion channels to confirm the σ1 receptor binding specificity, the fluorine-18 or carbon-11 analogues of 14a-c and 14e will be synthesized to test their feasibility as useful PET probes to quantify the density of σ1 receptors in human beings. In addition, the SAR information from the current study provides new insight into σ1 receptor ligands.
4. Experimental Section
General
All reagents and chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. All anhydrous reactions were carried out in an oven-dried and nitrogen purged glassware unless otherwise stated. Flash column chromatography was conducted using silica gel 60A, “40 Micron Flash” [32-63 μm] (Scientific Absorbents, Inc.); the mobile phase used is reported in the experimental procedure for each compound. Melting points were determined using the MEL-TEMP 3.0 apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 300 MHz on a Varian Mercury-VX spectrometer with CDCl3 as solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard unless otherwise stated. All chemical shift values are reported in parts per million (PPM) (δ). Peak multiplicities are singlet, s; doublet, d; triplet t; multiplet, m; broad, br. Elemental analyses (C, H, N) were determined by Atlantic Microlab, Inc. Elemental analysis and HPLC were used to determine the purity of the target compounds that were used for binding assay. All the final compounds reported the biologic activity in the manuscript have a purity of ≥ 95%.
(5,6-Dihydropyridin-1(2H)-yl)(phenyl)methanone (10)
Into a solution of 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (1.00 g, 12.0 mmol) and triethylamine (3 mL) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), benzoyl chloride (1.69 g, 12.0 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hrs and washed with saturated Na2CO3 (20 mL × 3) and brine solution (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum to afford crude product. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (10/3, v/v) to afford target product 10 as a colorless oil (2.27 g, 99.5%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.16–2.25 (m, 2H), 3.46–4.20 (m, 4H), 5.53–5.91 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.53 (m, 5H).
7-Oxa-3-azabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-yl(phenyl)methanone (11)
Into a solution of 10 (2.27 g, 12.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL), a solution of 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (5.43 g, 77% pure, 24.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 hrs. After the reaction was complete as determined by TLC (hexane/ethyl acetate, 1/1, v/v), saturated Na2CO3 solution (50 mL) was added into the reaction vial slowly with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min. The organic layer was washed with saturated Na2CO3 solution (50 mL × 3), brine solution (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (3/1, v/v) as the mobile phase to afford the product as a sticky oil (1.54 g, 62%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.04–2.18 (m, 2H), 3.09–4.40 (m, 6H), 7.28–7.47 (m, 5H).
Procedure A: General method for preparation of 1'-substituted benzoyl-4-acyl-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-3'-yl acetates (12a and 12c) and 1'-substituted benzoyl-4-acyl-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4'-yl acetates (12b and 12d)
A mixture of 11 (0.50 g, 1.97 mmol), 4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine hydrochloride (1.20 g, 4.92 mmol), and triethylamine (1 mL) in ethanol (50 mL) was heated to 70 °C with stirring for over 24 hrs. The reaction mixture was cooled, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and washed with water (50 mL), saturated Na2CO3 (50 mL) and brine solution. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford crude product as an oil. Acetic anhydride (1.11 g, 10.92 mmol) was added into a solution of this crude product in CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The mixture was washed with saturated Na2CO3 (30 mL × 3) and brine solution. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate/hexane (2/1, v/v) as the mobile phase to afford 12a (0.41 g, 37%), the first eluted compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ : 1.40–1.74 (m, 3H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.30–2.37 (m, 1H), 2.51–2.69 (m, 2H, ), 2.86–3.21 (m, 6H), 4.30–4.70 (m, 1H), 4.80–5.10 (br s, 1H), 7.13 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.41 (m, 5H), 7.93–7.97 (m, 2H). At the same time, 1'-benzoyl-4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4'-yl acetate (12b) (0.50 g, 45%) was eluted as the second compound and 12b was a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.50–1.90 (m, 3H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 2.81–3.29 (m, 6H), 2.20–2.80 (m, 4H), 3.50–4.00 (m, 2H), 4.64 (br s, 1H), 5.10–5.18 (m, 1H), 7.12 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.93 (m, 2H).
1'-Benzoyl-4-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-3'-yl acetate (12c) and 1'-benzoyl-4-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-1,3'-bipiperidin-4'-yl acetate (12d)
Procedure A was followed with 4-(4-methoxybenzoyl)piperidine hydrochloride, 11, triethylamine and acetic anhydride to afford 12c (0.42 g, 37%) as a colorless oil that was eluted first and 12d (0.34 g, 37%) as a colorless oil that was eluted second. The 1H NMR of 12c (CDCl3): δ 1.40–1.90 (m, 8H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.22–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.70 (m, 2), 2.80–3.22 (m, 4H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.00–4.60 (m, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (s, 5H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H). The 1H NMR of 12d (CDCl3): δ 1.45–1.90 (m, 7H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.22–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.80–3.30 (m, 5H), 3.64 (br s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 4.64 (br s, 1H), 5.10–5.20 (m, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (br s, 5H), 7.89 (m, 2H).
Procedure B. General method for preparation of (3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-substituted-phenyl)methanones (13a and 13c) and (4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-substituted-phenyl)methanones (13b and 13d)
To a solution of 12a (0.66 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL), 6N HCl (4 mL, 2.40 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 14 hours. The mixture was cooled and concentrated under vacuum. 1N NaOH solution (20 mL) was added to the residue, the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL × 3).The combined organic phases were washed with saturated sodium carbonate (20 mL × 3) and brine solution, dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using methanol/ethyl acetate/triethylamine (50/50/2, v/v/v) as the mobile phase to afford 13a as a colorless oil (132 mg, 66%).1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.37–1.89 (m, 8H), 2.24–2.77 (m, 6H), 2.98–3.01 (m, 1H), 3.12–3.24 (m, 2H), 3.35–3.51 (m, 2H), 7.11–7.17 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.94–7.99 (m, 2H).
(3'-Hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (13b)
Procedure B was followed with 12b and 6N HCl to afford 13b as a colorless oil (173 mg, 76%). 1H NMR (CDCl3 + CD3OD): δ 1.56–1.92 (m, 7H), 2.41–3.47 (m, 11H), 3.62–3.70 (m, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 6.99–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.94–7.98 (m, 2H).
(1'-Benzoyl-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (13c)
Procedure B was followed with 12c to afford 13c as a colorless oil (0.22 g, 67%). 1H NMR (CDCl3 + CD3OD): δ 1.43–1.51 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.90 (m, 5H), 2.10–2.12 (m, 1H), 2.29–2.40 (m, 2H), 2.49–2.61 (m, 2H), 2.77–2.88 (m, 2H), 3.03–3.06 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.26 (m, 2H), 3.51–3.59 (m, 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.94–7.98 (m, 2H).
(1'-Benzoyl-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (13d)
Procedure B was followed with 12d to afford 13d as a colorless oil (0.18 g, 82%). 1HNMR (CDCl3 + CD3OD): δ 1.56–1.92 (m, 6H), 2.07–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.41–2.80 (m, 5H), 2.80–3.00 (m, 1H), 3.00–3.18 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.40 (m, 2H), 3.62–3.70 (m, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 6.99–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.94–7.98 (m, 2H).
Procedure C. General method for preparation of benzyl compounds (14a-h) (1'-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (14a)
Into a solution of 13a (132 mg, 0.42 mmol) and triethylamine (17.1 mg, 1.69 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL), a solution of 4-fluorobenzyl bromide (80 mg, 0.42 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was washed with water (20 mL × 2) and brine solution (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatograph using triethylamine/ethyl acetate (1/50, v/v) as mobile phase to afford 14a as a pale yellow oil (78.9 mg, 45%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.53–2.04 (m, 9H), 2.20–2.32 (m, 2H), 2.71–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.01 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.22 (m, 2H), 3.51–3.63 (m, 3H), 6.96–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.93–7.98 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the corresponding oxalate salt by dissolving it in acetone and mixing with 1 equivalent of oxalic acid in acetone. mp (oxalate salt): 234 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H28F2N2O2•H2C2O4•0.25H2O) C, H, N.
(4-Fluorophenyl)(3'-hydroxy-1'-(4-methoxybenzyl)-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)methanone (14b)
Procedure C was followed with 13a, triethylamine and 4-methoxybenzyl bromide to afford 14b (54 mg, 78%). 1H NMR(CDCl3): δ 1.55–1.87 (m, 7H), 2.23–2.27 (m, 2H), 2.70–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.92–3.00 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.24 (m, 2H), 3.48–3.60 (m, 4H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 6.83–6.86 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.21 (m, 4H), 7.93–7.98 (m, 2H). mp (oxalate salt): 237 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H31FN2O3•H2C2O4•0. 5H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzyl-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (14c)
Procedure C was followed with 13a, triethylamine and benzyl bromide to afford 14c (54 mg, 84%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.57–2.03 (m, 8H), 2.17–2.28 (m, 2H), 2.71–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.93–3.01 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.50–3.63 (m, 4H), 7.10–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.31 (m, 5H), 7.93 –7.98 (m, 2H). mp (oxalate salt): 243 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H29FN2O2•H2C2O4•0.25H2O) C, H, N.
(4-Fluorophenyl)(3'-hydroxy-1'-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)methanone (14d)
Procedure C was followed with 13a, triethylamine and pyridin-4-methyl bromide to yield 14d (19 mg, 50%). The mobile phase used for column chromatographic separation was triethylamine/ethyl acetate/methanol (1/9/1, v/v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.71–2.02 (m, 8H), 2.24–2.28 (m, 2H), 2.74–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.00 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.21 (m, 2H), 3.50–3.60 (m, 4H), 7.10–7.17 ( m, 2H), 7.23–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.62–7.65 (m, 1H), 7.94–7.98 (m, 2H), 8.50–8.52 (m, 2H). mp (oxalate salt): 178 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C23H28FN3O2•1.5H2C2O4•H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (14e)
Procedure C was followed with 13c, triethylamine and 4-fluorobenzyl bromide to afford 14e (24.5 mg, 63%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.56–2.28 (m, 8H), 2.18–2.30 (m, 2H), 2.70–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.92–2.99 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.23 (m, 2H), 3.48–3.62 (m, 4H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 6.83–6.95 (m, 4H), 7.18–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.90–7.94 (m, 2H). mp (oxalate salt): 231 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H31FN2O3•H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
(3'-Hydroxy-1'-(4-methoxybenzyl)-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (14f)
Procedure C was followed with 13c, triethylamine and 4-methoxybenzyl bromide to afford 14f (30 mg, 73%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.51–2.00 (m, 8H), 2.20–2.32 (m, 2H), 2.71–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.01 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.22 (m, 2H), 3.51–3.63 (m, 4H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.96–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.93–7.98 (m, 2H). mp (oxalate salt): 225 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H31FN2O3•H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzyl-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (14g)
Procedure C was followed with 13c, triethylamine and benzyl bromide to afford 14g (32 mg, 34%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.54–2.04 (m, 8H), 2.22–2.27 (m, 2H), 2.70–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.93–3.00 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.54–3.62 (m, 4H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.94 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.31 (m, 5H), 7.93 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H).. mp (oxalate salt): 234 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H32N2O3•2H2C2O4).
(3'-Hydroxy-1'-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (14h)
Procedure C was followed with 13c, triethylamine and pyridin-4-methyl bromide to prepare 14h (20 mg, 52%). The mobile phase used for column chromatographic separation was triethylamine/ethyl acetate/methanol (1/9/1, v/v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.72–2.03 (m, 8H), 2.25–2.29 (m, 2H), 2.74–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.00 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.21 (m, 2H), 3.55–3.61 (m, 4H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 6.95 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.23–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.62–7.65 (m, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 8.50–8.52 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 188 °C (decomposed). Anal (C24H31N3O3 •2H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
Procedure D. General method for preparation of benzamides (15a-g) (3'-Hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidine]-1',4-diyl)bis(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (15a)
Into a solution of 13a (50 mg, 0.163 mmol), BOP-Cl (100 mg, 0.40 mmol), and triethylamine (1 mL) in methylene chloride (30 mL) was added 4-fluorobenzoic acid (40 mg, 0.28 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was washed with saturated sodium carbonate (20 mL × 5) and brine solution (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using triethylamine/ethyl acetate (1/50, v/v) as mobile phase to afford 15a (62 mg, 89%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.54–1.93 (m, 7H), 2.27–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.44–2.52 (m, 1H), 2.80–2.98 (m, 5H), 3.23–3.26 (m, 1H), 3.30–3.60 (m, 1H), 4.80 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.18 (m, 4H), 7.40–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.94–7.99 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 213 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H26F2N2O5•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(4-(4-Fluorobenzoyl)-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-1'-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (15b)
Procedure D was followed with 13a, BOP-Cl, triethylamine and 4-methoxybenzoic acid to afford 15b (48 mg, 22%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) : δ 1.54–1.93 (m, 7H), 2.31–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.44 –2.51 (m, 1H), 2.79 –2.98 (m, 5H), 3.23–3.26 (m, 1H), 3.47 (m, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 6.91 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.94–7.99 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 206 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H27FN2O3•H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzoyl-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (15c)
Procedure D was followed with 13a, BOP-Cl, triethylamine and benzoic acid to afford 15c (0.34 g, 78%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.75–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.80–1.95 (m, 4H), 2.20–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.40–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.60–3.00 (m, 5H), 3.10–3.30 (m, 1H), 4.10 (s br s, 1H), 4.86 (br s, 1H), 7.12–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.95–7.99 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 152 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H27FN2O3•H2C2O4•H2O) C, H, N.
(4-(4-Fluorobenzoyl)-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-1'-yl)(pyridin-3-yl)methanone (15d)
Procedure D was followed with 13a, BOP Cl, triethylamine and pyridine-3-carboxylic acid to afford15d (33 mg, 83%). The mobile phase used for column chromatographic separation was triethylamine/ethyl acetate/methanol (1/9/1, v/v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.44–2.11 (m, 6H), 2.20–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.40–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.60–3.10 (m, 5H), 3.10–3.30 (m, 1H), 3.38–3.85 (m, 2H), 3.90–4.30 (m, 1H), 4.80–5.10 (m, 1H), 7.12–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.73–7.75 (m, 1H), 7.95–7.99 (m, 2H), 8.66–8.68 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 215 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C23H26FN3O3•H2C2O4•0.25H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-(4-Fluorobenzoyl)-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (15e)
Procedure D was followed with 13c, BOP-Cl, triethylamine and 4-fluorobenzoic acid to prepare 15e (84 mg, 67%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.30–1.98 (m, 5H), 2.16–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.34–2.41 (m, 1H), 2.45–3.65 (m, 8H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 4.03 (br s, 1H), 4.72 (br s, 1H), 6.83–6.87 (m, 2H), 6.97–7.03 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.81–7.85 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 216 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H29FN2O4•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzoyl-3'-hydroxy-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (15f)
Procedure D was followed with 13c, BOP-Cl, triethylamine and benzoic acid to afford 15f (0.14 g. 80%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.60–1.90 (m, 5H), 2.10–2.50 (m, 2H), 2.60–3.00 (m, 5H), 3.20–3.50 (m, 2H), 3.65 (s, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.10 (s br, 1H), 5.30 (br s 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.40 (m, 5H), 7.92 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 188 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H30N2O8•H2C2O4•1.5H2O) C, H, N.
(3'-Hydroxy-1'-isonicotinoyl-[1,4'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (15g)
Procedure D was followed with 13c, BOP-Cl, triethylamine and pyridine-3-carboxylic acid to afford 15g (36 mg, 90%). The mobile phase used for column chromatographic separation was triethylamine/ethyl acetate/methanol (1/9/1, v/v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.61–1.96 (m, 6H), 2.04–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.27–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.80–2.09 (m, 4H), 2.09–3.27 (m, 2H), 3.44–3.69 (m, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.85–5.15 (m, 1H), 6.93–6.97 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.73–7.80 (m, 1H), 7.85–7.94 (m, 2H), 8.67–8.68 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 220°C (decomposed). EIMS: Calcd, 429.1843; Found, 429.1843. Anal. (C24H29N3O4•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(1'-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (16a)
Procedure C was followed with 13b, triethylamine and 4-fluorobenzyl bromide to yield 16a as a pale yellow oil (28.7 mg, 43%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.55–2.05 (m, 9H), 2.24–2.31 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.57 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.83 (m, 3H), 2.94–3.04 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.49 (m, 3H), 6.98–7.05 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.92–7.97 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 209 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H28F2N2O2•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(4-Fluorophenyl)(4'-hydroxy-1'-(4-methoxybenzyl)-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)methanone (16b)
Procedure C was followed with 13b, triethylamine and 4-methoxybenzyl bromide to afford 16b (28 mg, 45%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.56–2.06 (m, 8H), 2.26–2.30 (m, 1H), 2.53– 2.56 (m, 1H), 2.72–2.86 (m, 3H), 3.00–3.03 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.50 (m, 4H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 6.86–6.89 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.92–7.97 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 204 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H31FN2O3•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzyl-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (16c)
Procedure C was followed with 13b, triethylamine and benzyl bromide to afford 16c (40 mg, 62%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.56–2.06 (m, 8H), 2.24–2.3 (m, 1H), 2.51–2.59 (m, 1H), 2.72–2.86 (m, 3H), 3.00–3.04 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.54 (m, 4H), 7.10 –7.15 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.92–7.97 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 200 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C24H29FN2O2•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(4-Fluorophenyl)(4'-hydroxy-1'-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)methanone (16d)
Procedure C was followed with 13b, triethylamine and pyridine-4-methyl bromide to afford 16d (22 mg, 56%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.56–2.08 (m, 8H), 2.24–2.32 (m, 1H), 2.48–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.70–3.04 (m, 5H), 3.19–3.59 (m, 5H), 7.13 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.69 (m, 1H), 7.92–7.97 (m, 2H), 8.52–8.54 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 182 °C. Anal. (C23H28FN3O2•H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
(1'-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (16e)
Procedure C was followed with 13d, triethylamine and 4-fluorobenzyl bromide to afford 16e (38 mg, 55%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.55–2.06 (m, 8H), 2.28 (td, J = 2.1, 13.8 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (td, J = 3.3, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.71–2.84 (m, 3H), 2.90–3.10 (m, 2H), 3.04–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.49 (m, 4H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.92–7.04 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.92 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 221 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H31FN2O3•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(4'-Hydroxy-1'-(4-methoxybenzyl)-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (16f)
Procedure C was followed with 13d, triethylamine and 4-methoxybenzyl bromide to afford 16f (32 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.54–2.06 (m, 8H), 2.24–2.28 (m, 1H), 2.50–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.72–2.86 (m, 3H), 2.98–3.02 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.41–3.48 (m, 3H), 3.62 (br s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.85–6.95 (m, 4H), 7.22 (dd, J = 2.1, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (dd, J = 2.1, 6.9 Hz, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 182 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C26H34N2O4•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
(1'-Benzyl-4'-hydroxy-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (16g)
Procedure C was followed with 13d, triethylamine and benzyl bromide to afford 16g (90 mg, 71%). 1HNMR (CDCl3): δ 1.57–2.04 (m, 8H), 2.25–2.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.51–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.70–2.86 (m, 3H), 3.00–3.04 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.59 (m, 4H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.91–6.94 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.89–7.92 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 220.3 °C (decomposed). Anal. (C25H32N2O3•H2C2O4•0.5H2O) C, H, N.
(4'-Hydroxy-1'-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-[1,3'-bipiperidin]-4-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (16h)
Procedure C was followed with 13d, triethylamine and pyridine-4-methyl bromide to afford 16h (13 mg, 34%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.58–2.08 (m, 8H), 2.22 - 2.29 (m, 1H), 2.52–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.70–3.04 (m, 5H), 3.18–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.42–3.54 (m, 4H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 6.91–6.96 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.30 (m, 1H), 7.63–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.89–7.94 (m, 2H), 8.52–8.54 (m, 2H). The free base was converted to the oxalate salt. mp: 202 °C. Anal. (C24H31N3O3•H2C2O4) C, H, N.
In vitro Biological Evaluation
Sigma receptor binding assays
The compounds were dissolved in DMF, DMSO, or ethanol, and then diluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 100 mM EDTA at pH 7.4, prior to performing the σ1 and σ2 receptor binding assays. The procedures for isolating the membrane homogenates and performing the σ1 and σ2 receptor binding assays have been previously described in detail.42
Briefly, the σ1 receptor binding assays were conducted in 96-well plates using guinea pig brain membrane homogenates (~300 Wg protein) and ~5 nM (+)-[3H]pentazocine (34.9 Ci/mmol, Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA). The total incubation time was 90 min at room temperature. Nonspecific binding was determined from samples that contained 10 μM of cold haloperidol. After 90 min, the reaction was quenched by adding 150 μL of ice-cold wash buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) using a 96 channel transfer pipet (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The samples were harvested and filtered rapidly through a 96-well fiberglass filter plate (Millipore, Billerica, MA) that had been presoaked with 100 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.0 for 1 h. Each filter was washed 3 times with 200 μL of ice-cold wash buffer, and the filter counted in a Wallac 1450 MicroBeta liquid scintillation counter (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA).
The σ2 receptor binding assays were conducted using rat liver membrane homogenates (~300 μg protein) and ~5 nM [3H]DTG (58.1 Ci/mmol, Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA) in the presence of 1 μM of (+)-pentazocine to block σ1 sites. The incubation time was 2 h at room temperature. Nonspecific binding was determined from samples that contained 10 μM of cold haloperidol. All other procedures were identical to those described for the σ1 receptor binding assay above.
Data from the competitive inhibition experiments were modeled using nonlinear regression analysis to determine the concentration that inhibits 50% of the specific binding of the radioligand (IC50 value). Competitive curves were best fit to a one-site fit and gave pseudo-Hill coefficients of 0.6-1.0. Ki values were calculated using the method of Cheng and Prusoff and are presented as the mean (± 1 SEM). For these calculations, we used a Kd value of 7.89 nM for (+) [3H]pentazocine and guinea pig brain and a Kd value of 30.73 nM for [3H]DTG and rat liver.
Vesicular acetylcholine transporter binding assays
In vitro VAChT binding assays of these novel compounds were performed on human vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) permanently expressed in PC12A123.7 cells at about 50 pmol/mg of crude extract. The radioligand used was 5 nM (-)-[3H]vesamicol, and the assay was conducted as described at final concentrations of 10-11 M to 10-5 M novel compound (53). Unlabeled (-)-vesamicol was used as an external standard, for which Ki = 15 nM, and the mixture was allowed to equilibrate for 20 hrs. Duplicate data were averaged and fitted by regression with a rectangular hyperbola to estimate the Ki value of the novel compound. All compounds were independently assayed at least two times.
Dopamine Receptor Binding Assays
In vitro D2, D3 binding assays were performed on human D2 and D3 receptor expressed HEK 293 cells according our recently published protocol.48
5-HT1A receptor binding assays
The binding affinity at 5-HT1A receptors was characterized by a filtration assay following the reported procedure49 with minor modification. Human 5-HT1A serotonin receptor membranes (~10 ug protein) (ChanTest, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) were diluted in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 0.1mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and incubated in a total volume of 150 uL with ~0.89 nM [3H] 8-OH-DPAT (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) at 25°C in 96 well sample plates for 60 min. 10 μM WAY-100635 was used to define the non-specific binding. The radioligand concentration was equal to approximately twice the Kd value and the concentration of the competitive inhibitor ranged over 6 orders of magnitude for competition experiments (0.1 nM-10 μM or 0.01 nM-1 μM). The reactions were terminated by the addition of 150 μL of cold wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, at 4°C) using a 96 channel transfer pipette (Fisher Scientific), and the samples harvested and filtered rapidly to Millipore MultiScreenHTS 96-Well Filter Plates that had been presoaked with 100 μL of 50 mM Tris HCl buffer, pH 8.0 for 1 h. Each filter was washed with 200 μL of ice-cold wash buffer for a total of three washes. Filters were dissolved in 2.5 mL of scintillation fluid and a Wallac 1450 MicroBeta liquid scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) was used to measure the radioactivity. The concentration of inhibitor that inhibits 50% of the specific binding of the radioligand (IC50 value) was determined by using nonlinear regression analysis to analyze the data of competitive inhibition experiments. Competition curves were modeled for a single site and the IC50 values were converted to equilibrium dissociation constants (Ki values) using the Cheng and Prusoff equation with equilibrium dissociation constant Kd = 0.35 nM.
Acknowledgement
Financial support for these studies was provided by the National Institute of Health under NS061025-02 (ZT), MH092797-01(ZT) and MH081281-04 (RHM).
Abbreviations List
- Anal.
Analysis
- BOP-Cl
bis(2-oxo-3-oxazolidinyl)phosphonic chloride
- Calcd.
calculated
- CIMS.
Chemical ionization mass spectrometry
- CNS
central nervous system
- SAR
structure-activity relationship
- DCC
N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
- DMF
N,N-dimethylformamide
- DMSO
dimethyl sulfoxide
- DTG
1,3-ditolylguanidine
- ND
not determined
- PET
positron emission tomography
- prezamicol
3-hydroxy-4-(4-phenylpiperidinyl)piperidine
- THF
tetrahydrofuran
- TLC
thin layer chromatography
- trozamicol
4-hydroxy-3-(4-phenylpiperidinyl)piperidine
- VAChT
vesicular acetylcholine transporter
- vesamicol
(-)-trans-2-(4-phenylpiperidino)cyclohexanol
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Analytical data of new analogues. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Reference
- 1.Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, Huppler RE, Gilbert PE. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1976;197:517–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chang KJ, Cuatrecasas P. Heterogeneity and properties of opiate receptors. Fed. Proc. 1981;40:2729–2734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quirion R, Bowen WD, Itzhak Y, Junien JL, Musacchio JM, Rothman RB, Su TP, Tam SW, Taylor DP. A proposal for the classification of sigma binding sites. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1992;13:85–86. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90030-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Antonini V, Prezzavento O, Coradazzi M, Marrazzo A, Ronsisvalle S, Arena E, Leanza G. Anti-amnesic properties of (+/–) PPCC, a novel sigma receptor ligand, on cognitive dysfunction induced by selective cholinergic lesion in rats. J. Neurochem. 2009;109:744–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aydar E, Onganer P, Perrett R, Djamgoz MB, Palmer CP. The expression and functional characterization of sigma (σ) 1 receptors in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2006;242:245–257. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kekuda R, Prasad PD, Fei YJ, Leibach FH, Ganapathy V. Cloning and functional expression of the human type 1 sigma receptor (hSigmaR1). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;229:553–558. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abate C, Mosier PD, Berardi F, Glennon RA. A structure-affinity and comparative molecular field analysis of sigma 2 (sigma(2)) receptor ligands. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. 2009;9:246–257. doi: 10.2174/1871524910909030246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deutsch SI, Weizman A, Goldman ME, Morihisa JM. The sigma receptor: a novel site implicated in psychosis and antipsychotic drug efficacy. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 1988;11:105–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aydar E, Palmer CP, Djamgoz MB. Sigma receptors and cancer: possible involvement of ion channels. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5029–5035. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kitaichi K, Chabot JG, Moebius FF, Flandorfer A, Glossmann H, Quirion R. Expression of the purported sigma1 (σ1) receptor in the mammalian brain and its possible relevance in deficits induced by antagonism of the NMDA receptor complex as revealed using an antisense strategy. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2000;20:375–387. doi: 10.1016/s0891-0618(00)00106-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bourrie B, Bribes E, Derocq JM, Vidal H, Casellas P. Sigma receptor ligands: applications in inflammation and oncology. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2004;5:1158–1163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bowen WD. Sigma receptors: recent advances and new clinical potentials. Pharm. Acta Helv. 2000;74:211–218. doi: 10.1016/s0031-6865(99)00034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ayata C. Spreading depression: from serendipity to targeted therapy in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:1097–1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Entrena JM, Cobos EJ, Nieto FR, Cendán CM, Gris G, Del Pozo E, Zamanillo D, Baeyens JM. Sigma 1 receptors are essential for capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity: Studies with selective sigma-1 ligands and sigma-1 knockout mice. Pain. 2009;143:252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Díaz JL, Zamanillo D, Corbera J, Baeyens JM, Maldonado R, Pericàs M, Vela JM, Torrens A. Selective sigma-1 (sigma(1)) receptor antagonists: emerging target for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. 2009;9:172–183. doi: 10.2174/1871524910909030172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fishback JA, Robson MJ, Xu YT, Matsumoto RR. Sigma receptors: potential targets for a new class of antidepressant drug. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010;127:271–282. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maestrup EG, Wiese C, Schepmann D, Hiller A, Fischer S, Scheunemann M, Brust P, Wünsch B. Synthesis of spirocyclic σ1 receptor ligands as potential PET radiotracers, structure-affinity relationships and in vitro metabolic stability. Bioorg.Med. Chem. 2009;17:3630–3641. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blennow K, de Leon MJ, Zetterberg H. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2006;368:387–403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsumoto RR. Targeting sigma receptors: Novel medication development for drug abuse and addiction. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2009;2:351–358. doi: 10.1586/ecp.09.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Volz HP, Stoll KD. Clinical trials with sigma ligands. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2004;37:5214–5220. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kunitachi S, Fujita Y, Ishima T, Kohno M, Horio M, Tanibuchi Y, Shirayama Y, Iyo M, Hashimoto K. Phencyclidine-induced cognitive deficits in mice are ameliorated by subsequent subchronic administration of donepezil: role of sigma-1 receptors. Brain Res. 2009;1279:189–196. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maurice T, Su T-P. The pharmacology of sigma-1 receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009;124:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ogawa K, Shiba K, Akhter N, Yoshimoto M, Washiyama K, Kinuya S, Kawai K, Mori H. Evaluation of radioiodinated vesamicol analogs for sigma receptor imaging in tumor and radionuclide receptor therapy. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:2188–2192. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01279.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.John CS, Bowen WD, Varma VM, McAfee JG, Moody TW. Sigma receptors are expressed in human non-small cell lung carcinoma. Life Sci. 1995;56:2385–2392. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)00232-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vilner BJ, John CS, Bowen WD. Sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors are expressed in a wide variety of human and rodent tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1995;55:408–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.John CS, Gulden ME, Li J, Bowen WD, McAfee JG, Thakur ML. Synthesis, in vitro binding, and tissue distribution of radioiodinated 2-[125I]N-(N-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)-2-iodo benzamide, 2-[125I]BP: a potential σ receptor marker for human prostate tumors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1998;25:189–194. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(97)00168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao M, Wang M, Hutchins GD, Zheng QH. Synthesis of carbon-11-labeled piperidine ring of N-[ω-(6-methoxynaphthalen-1-yl)alkyl] derivatives as new selective PET σ1 receptor probes. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010;68:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brent PJ, Pang GT. Sigma binding site ligands inhibit cell proliferation in mammary and colon carcinoma cell lines and melanoma cells in culture. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1995;278:151–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00115-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mégalizzi V, Mathieu V, Mijatovic T, Gailly P, Debeir O, De Neve N, Van Damme M, Bontempi G, Haibe-Kains B, Decaestecker C, Kondo Y, Kiss R, Lefranc F. 4 IBP, a σ1 Receptor Agonist, Decreases the Migration of Human Cancer Cells, Including Glioblastoma Cells, In Vitro and Sensitizes Them In Vitro and In Vivo to Cytotoxic Insults of Proapoptotic and Proautophagic Drugs. Neoplasia. 2007;9:358–369. doi: 10.1593/neo.07130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spruce BA, Campbell LA, McTavish N, Cooper MA, Appleyard VL, O'Neill M, Howie J, Samson J, Watt S, Murray K, McLean D, Leslie NR, Safrany ST, Ferguson MJ, Peters JA, Prescott AR, Box G, Hayes A, Nutley B, Raynaud F, Downes CP, Lambert JJ, Thompson AM, Eccles S. Small Molecule Antagonists of the σ-1 Receptor Cause Selective Release of the Death Program in Tumor and Self Reliant Cells and Inhibit Tumor Growth In Vitro and In Vivo. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4875–4886. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hellewell SB, Bowen WD. A sigma like binding site in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells: decreased affinity for (+)-benzomorphans and lower molecular weight suggest a different sigma receptor form from that of guinea pig brain. Brain Res. 1990;527:244–253. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91143-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Georg A, Friedl A. Identification and characterization of two sigma-like binding sites in the mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma hybrid cell line NG108 15. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1991;259:479–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hayashi T, Su TP. An update on the development of drugs for neuropsychiatric disorders: focusing on the sigma 1 receptor ligand. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2008;12:45–58. doi: 10.1517/14728222.12.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mégalizzi V, Decaestecker C, Debeir O, Spiegl-Kreinecker S, Berger W, Lefranc F, Kast RE, Kiss R. Screening of anti-glioma effects induced by sigma-1 receptor ligands: potential new use for old anti-psychiatric medicines. Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:2893–2905. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bhuiyan MS, Tagashira H, Shioda N, Fukunaga K. Targeting sigma-1 receptor with fluvoxamine ameliorates pressure-overload induced hypertrophy and dysfunctions. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2010;14:1009–1022. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2010.509348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Collier TL, Waterhouse RN, Kassiou M. Imaging sigma receptors: applications in drug development. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007;13:51–72. doi: 10.2174/138161207779313740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Waterhouse RN, Chang RC, Zhao J, Carambot PE. In vivo evaluation in rats of [18F]1-(2-fluoroethyl)-4-[(4-cyanophenoxy)methyl]piperidine as a potential radiotracer for PET assessment of CNS sigma 1 receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006;33:211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Waterhouse RN, Collier TL. In vivo evaluation of [18F]1-(3-fluoropropyl)-4-(4-cyanophenoxymethyl)piperidine: A Selective Sigma-1 Receptor Radioligand for PET. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1997;24:127–134. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(96)00184-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Waterhouse RN, Stabin MG, Page JG. Preclinical acute toxicity studies and rodent based dosimetry estimates of the novel sigma-1 receptor radiotracer [18F]FPS. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003;30:555–563. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(03)00020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ishikawa M, Hashimoto K. The role of sigma 1 receptors in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric diseases. J. Recept., Ligand Channel Res. 2010;3:25–36. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ishikawa M, Sakata M, Ishii K, Kimura Y, Oda K, Toyohara J, Wu J, Ishiwata K, Iyo M, Hashimoto K. High occupancy of σ1 receptors in the human brain after single oral administration of donepezil: A positron emission tomography study using [11C]SA4503. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;12:1127–1131. doi: 10.1017/S1461145709990204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Costantino L, Gandolfi F, Sorbi C, Franchini S, Prezzavento O, Vittorio F, Ronsisvalle G, Leonardi A, Poggesi E, Brasili L. Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of 1-Aralkyl-4-Benzylpiperidine and 1-Aralkyl-4-Benzylpiperazine Derivatives as Potent σ Ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:266–273. doi: 10.1021/jm049433t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Efange SMN, Mach RH, Smith CR, Khare AB, Foulon C, Akella SK, Childers SR, Parsons SM. Vesamicol analogues as sigma ligands: Molecular determinants of selectivity at the vesamicol receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995;49:791–797. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)00541-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ishiwata K, Kawamura K, Yajima K, Tu Q, Mori H, Shiba K. Evaluation of (+)-p-[11C]methylvesamicol for mapping sigma1 receptors: a comparison with [11C]SA4503. Nucl. Med.Biol. 2006;33:543–548. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mach RH, Voytko ML, Ehrenkaufer RL, Nader MA, Tobin JR, Efange SMN, Parsons SM, Gage HD, Smith CR, Morton TE. Imaging of Cholinergic Terminals Using the Radiotracer [18F](+)-4-fluorobenzyltrozamicol: In Vitro Binding Studies and Positron Emission Tomography Studies in Nonhuman Primates. Synapse. 1997;25:368–380. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199704)25:4<368::AID-SYN8>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Efange SMN, Khare AB, von Hohenberg K, Mach RH, Parsons SM, Tu Z. Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of carbonyl group-containing inhibitors of vesicular acetylcholine transporter. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:2825–2835. doi: 10.1021/jm9017916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mach RH, Elder ST, Morton TE, Nowak PA, Evora PH, Scripko JG, Luedtke RR, Unsworth CD, Filtz T, Rao AV, Molinoff PB, Ehrenkaufer LE. The use of [18F]4-fluorobenzyl iodide (FBI) in PET radiotracer synthesis: Model alkylation studies and its application in the design of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-based imaging agents. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1993;20:777–794. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(93)90165-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tu Z, Li S, Cui J, Xu J, Taylor M, Ho D, Luedtke RR, Mach RH. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of fluorine-containing D3 dopamine receptor ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:1555–1564. doi: 10.1021/jm101323b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.May JA, McLaughlin MA, Sharif NA, Hellberg MR, Dean TR. Evaluation of the ocular hypotensive response of serotonin 5 HT1A and 5 HT2 receptor ligands in conscious ocular hypertensive cynomolgus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003;306:301–309. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.049528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





