Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 18;67(Pt 7):o1658. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811022409

4-(4-Hy­droxy­methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)benzoic acid

Dayang Hazwani Abang Ishak a, Hairul Anuar Tajuddin a,‡, Zanariah Abdullah a, Siti Nadiah Abd Halim a, Edward R T Tiekink a,*
PMCID: PMC3151797  PMID: 21837058

Abstract

In the title compound, C10H9N3O3, there is a small twist between the benzene and triazole rings [dihedral angle = 6.32 (7)°]; the carb­oxy­lic acid residue is almost coplanar with the benzene ring to which it is attached [O—C—C—C torsion angle = 1.49 (19)°]. The main deviation from coplanarity of the non-H atoms is found for the hy­droxy group which is almost perpendicular to the remaining atoms [N—C—C—O torsion angle = −75.46 (16)°]. In the crystal, the presence of O—H⋯O (between carboxyl groups) and O—H⋯N (between the hy­droxy group and the triazole ring) hydrogen bonds leads to supra­molecular chains along [03Inline graphic]. The chains are connected into sheets via C—H⋯O(hy­droxy) inter­actions.

Related literature

For background to the fluorescence potential, see: McCaroll & Wandruzska (1997 ▶). For synthetic protocols, see: Rostovtsev et al. (2002 ▶); Ryu & Zhao (2005 ▶); Himo et al. (2005 ▶). For additional geometric analysis, see: Spek (2009 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-o1658-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C10H9N3O3

  • M r = 219.20

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.4641 (7) Å

  • b = 6.6596 (8) Å

  • c = 13.1898 (16) Å

  • α = 88.828 (2)°

  • β = 83.577 (2)°

  • γ = 75.828 (2)°

  • V = 462.42 (10) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.12 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.684, T max = 0.746

  • 5837 measured reflections

  • 2099 independent reflections

  • 1852 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.022

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.130

  • S = 1.08

  • 2099 reflections

  • 151 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906sup1.cif

e-67-o1658-sup1.cif (16KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1658-Isup2.hkl (101.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1—H1o⋯O2i 0.85 (1) 1.77 (2) 2.6119 (14) 173 (2)
O3—H3o⋯N3ii 0.85 (1) 1.96 (1) 2.7995 (16) 169 (2)
C6—H6⋯O3iii 0.95 2.60 3.5309 (19) 167
C8—H8⋯O3iii 0.95 2.23 3.1262 (18) 158

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The University of Malaya is thanked for a University of Malaya Research Grant (No. RG080/09AFR) and for support of the crystallographic facility.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound, (I), is a precursor for the synthesis of fluorescent surfactants (McCaroll & Wandruzska, 1997). With the exception of the hydroxy substituent, the molecule of (I), Fig. 1, is essentially planar. The triazole ring is slightly twisted out of the plane of the benzene ring as seen in the value of the N2—N1—C5—C4 torsion angle of -6.43 (19) °; the dihedral angle between the rings is 6.32 (7) °. The carboxylic acid group is co-planar with the benzene ring to which it is attached: the O1—C1—C2—C3 torsion angle is 1.49 (19) °. The hydroxy group occupies a position almost perpendicular to the rest of the molecule with the N3—C9—C10—O3 torsion angle being -75.46 (16) °. Within the triazole ring, the sequence of N1—N2 [1.3562 (15) Å], N2—N3 [1.3141 (16) Å], N1—C8 [1.3579 (17) Å], N3—C9 [1.3627 (17) Å] and C8—C9 [1.3624 (19) Å] bond distances indicates considerable delocalization of π-electron density within the ring.

The crystal packing is dominated by O—H···O,N hydrogen bonding, Table 1. The carboxylic acid residues self-associate via the familiar eight-membered {··· HOC(═O)}2 synthon, and the hydroxy groups forms a hydrogen bond with the triazole-N3 atom via centrosymmetric 10-membered {···HOC2N}2 synthons. The result is the formation of a linear supramolecular chain with base vector [0 3 1], Fig. 2. Chains are connected into flat arrays via C—H···O hydrogen bonds and centrosymmetric ten-membered {···HC3O}2 synthons, Table 1 and Fig. 2. The closest interactions between layers are weak π···π contacts occurring between translationally related benzene and triazole rings [3.9433 (9) Å for symmetry operation x, 1 + y, z].

Experimental

The title compound was synthesized via a Cu(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition between 4-azidobenzoic acid and propargyl alcohol after literature procedures (Rostovtsev et al., 2002; Ryu & Zhao, 2005). 4-Azidobenzoic acid (1.0 g, 6.1 mmol) and propargyl alcohol (1.03 g, 18.4 mmol) were dissolved in methanol (20 ml) while stirring in the dark. Freshly prepared catalyst was prepared from the reduction of copper(II) sulfate (0.2 g, 0.08 mmol) with sodium ascorbate (0.4 g, 2 mmol) in about 2 ml of water (Himo et al., 2005). The catalyst was then added into the mixture followed by stirring for 3 h. The crude product was dissolved in diethyl ether and washed with cold distilled water (50 ml). The organic layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under vacuum to obtain 0.12 g (21%) of pure product. Yellow blocks were grown from its solution of THF (with a drop of ethyl acetate); M.pt. 529 - 532 K.

Refinement

Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H 0.95 to 0.99 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The O-bound H atoms were located in a difference map and their positions refined with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of compound (I) showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the supramolecular layer in (I) mediated by O—H···O, O—H···N and C—H···O interactions, shown as orange, blue and purple dashed lines, respectively.

Crystal data

C10H9N3O3 Z = 2
Mr = 219.20 F(000) = 228
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.574 Mg m−3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.4641 (7) Å Cell parameters from 3318 reflections
b = 6.6596 (8) Å θ = 3.1–30.7°
c = 13.1898 (16) Å µ = 0.12 mm−1
α = 88.828 (2)° T = 100 K
β = 83.577 (2)° Block, yellow
γ = 75.828 (2)° 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
V = 462.42 (10) Å3

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer 2099 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1852 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.022
ω scans θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.684, Tmax = 0.746 k = −8→8
5837 measured reflections l = −17→17

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.130 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0804P)2 + 0.1593P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2099 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
151 parameters Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 −0.21174 (19) −0.26084 (15) 0.47377 (8) 0.0193 (3)
H1O −0.202 (4) −0.376 (2) 0.5038 (14) 0.029*
O2 0.19712 (19) −0.40260 (15) 0.41945 (7) 0.0187 (3)
O3 0.24825 (19) 0.81745 (15) −0.07164 (7) 0.0188 (3)
H3O 0.219 (4) 0.9413 (17) −0.0937 (14) 0.028*
N1 0.0479 (2) 0.47484 (17) 0.19947 (8) 0.0133 (3)
N2 −0.1613 (2) 0.63139 (18) 0.19229 (9) 0.0163 (3)
N3 −0.0881 (2) 0.76979 (18) 0.13169 (9) 0.0161 (3)
C1 0.0044 (3) −0.2560 (2) 0.42301 (10) 0.0141 (3)
C2 0.0120 (2) −0.06148 (19) 0.36720 (10) 0.0133 (3)
C3 −0.2008 (3) 0.1064 (2) 0.37192 (10) 0.0144 (3)
H3 −0.3530 0.0977 0.4123 0.017*
C4 −0.1908 (3) 0.2860 (2) 0.31786 (10) 0.0149 (3)
H4 −0.3345 0.4007 0.3214 0.018*
C5 0.0336 (2) 0.2951 (2) 0.25830 (10) 0.0131 (3)
C6 0.2481 (3) 0.1299 (2) 0.25451 (10) 0.0145 (3)
H6 0.4008 0.1394 0.2146 0.017*
C7 0.2373 (3) −0.0480 (2) 0.30923 (10) 0.0148 (3)
H7 0.3831 −0.1608 0.3073 0.018*
C8 0.2538 (3) 0.5157 (2) 0.14328 (10) 0.0155 (3)
H8 0.4227 0.4318 0.1356 0.019*
C9 0.1648 (2) 0.7034 (2) 0.10030 (10) 0.0146 (3)
C10 0.3059 (3) 0.8278 (2) 0.03094 (10) 0.0171 (3)
H10A 0.2585 0.9739 0.0543 0.021*
H10B 0.4908 0.7740 0.0335 0.021*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0197 (5) 0.0161 (5) 0.0217 (5) −0.0063 (4) 0.0026 (4) 0.0063 (4)
O2 0.0211 (5) 0.0135 (5) 0.0195 (5) −0.0024 (4) 0.0010 (4) 0.0038 (4)
O3 0.0226 (5) 0.0145 (5) 0.0167 (5) −0.0011 (4) −0.0003 (4) 0.0049 (4)
N1 0.0136 (5) 0.0111 (5) 0.0149 (5) −0.0028 (4) −0.0013 (4) 0.0033 (4)
N2 0.0152 (6) 0.0136 (6) 0.0188 (6) −0.0019 (4) −0.0010 (4) 0.0050 (4)
N3 0.0167 (6) 0.0138 (5) 0.0175 (6) −0.0039 (4) −0.0008 (4) 0.0050 (4)
C1 0.0170 (6) 0.0132 (6) 0.0128 (6) −0.0054 (5) −0.0012 (5) 0.0011 (5)
C2 0.0162 (7) 0.0116 (6) 0.0129 (6) −0.0050 (5) −0.0017 (5) 0.0017 (5)
C3 0.0139 (6) 0.0150 (6) 0.0148 (6) −0.0054 (5) 0.0003 (4) 0.0021 (5)
C4 0.0135 (6) 0.0137 (6) 0.0166 (6) −0.0019 (5) −0.0014 (5) 0.0025 (5)
C5 0.0159 (6) 0.0121 (6) 0.0124 (6) −0.0056 (5) −0.0020 (5) 0.0029 (5)
C6 0.0138 (6) 0.0139 (6) 0.0155 (6) −0.0039 (5) 0.0001 (5) 0.0025 (5)
C7 0.0154 (6) 0.0123 (6) 0.0159 (6) −0.0026 (5) −0.0009 (5) 0.0018 (5)
C8 0.0142 (6) 0.0153 (6) 0.0165 (6) −0.0042 (5) 0.0007 (5) 0.0031 (5)
C9 0.0148 (6) 0.0137 (6) 0.0154 (6) −0.0039 (5) −0.0016 (5) 0.0021 (5)
C10 0.0175 (6) 0.0166 (6) 0.0173 (7) −0.0052 (5) −0.0009 (5) 0.0048 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—C1 1.2982 (16) C3—C4 1.3891 (18)
O1—H1O 0.848 (9) C3—H3 0.9500
O2—C1 1.2456 (17) C4—C5 1.3939 (18)
O3—C10 1.4299 (17) C4—H4 0.9500
O3—H3O 0.852 (9) C5—C6 1.3944 (18)
N1—N2 1.3562 (15) C6—C7 1.3852 (18)
N1—C8 1.3579 (17) C6—H6 0.9500
N1—C5 1.4266 (16) C7—H7 0.9500
N2—N3 1.3141 (16) C8—C9 1.3624 (19)
N3—C9 1.3627 (17) C8—H8 0.9500
C1—C2 1.4838 (18) C9—C10 1.4970 (18)
C2—C7 1.3961 (18) C10—H10A 0.9900
C2—C3 1.3985 (18) C10—H10B 0.9900
C1—O1—H1O 110.8 (14) C4—C5—N1 120.37 (12)
C10—O3—H3O 106.1 (13) C6—C5—N1 118.51 (12)
N2—N1—C8 110.82 (11) C7—C6—C5 119.59 (12)
N2—N1—C5 121.00 (11) C7—C6—H6 120.2
C8—N1—C5 128.16 (11) C5—C6—H6 120.2
N3—N2—N1 106.38 (11) C6—C7—C2 119.94 (12)
N2—N3—C9 109.65 (11) C6—C7—H7 120.0
O2—C1—O1 123.72 (12) C2—C7—H7 120.0
O2—C1—C2 120.44 (12) N1—C8—C9 104.78 (12)
O1—C1—C2 115.84 (12) N1—C8—H8 127.6
C7—C2—C3 120.00 (12) C9—C8—H8 127.6
C7—C2—C1 118.69 (12) C8—C9—N3 108.36 (11)
C3—C2—C1 121.31 (12) C8—C9—C10 129.04 (12)
C4—C3—C2 120.37 (12) N3—C9—C10 122.59 (12)
C4—C3—H3 119.8 O3—C10—C9 110.65 (11)
C2—C3—H3 119.8 O3—C10—H10A 109.5
C3—C4—C5 118.94 (12) C9—C10—H10A 109.5
C3—C4—H4 120.5 O3—C10—H10B 109.5
C5—C4—H4 120.5 C9—C10—H10B 109.5
C4—C5—C6 121.12 (12) H10A—C10—H10B 108.1
C8—N1—N2—N3 0.21 (15) C8—N1—C5—C6 −5.0 (2)
C5—N1—N2—N3 −178.52 (11) C4—C5—C6—C7 1.2 (2)
N1—N2—N3—C9 −0.04 (15) N1—C5—C6—C7 −178.62 (11)
O2—C1—C2—C7 1.3 (2) C5—C6—C7—C2 0.4 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C7 −178.57 (11) C3—C2—C7—C6 −1.5 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C3 −178.67 (12) C1—C2—C7—C6 178.55 (12)
O1—C1—C2—C3 1.49 (19) N2—N1—C8—C9 −0.29 (15)
C7—C2—C3—C4 1.0 (2) C5—N1—C8—C9 178.32 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −179.03 (11) N1—C8—C9—N3 0.26 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.6 (2) N1—C8—C9—C10 179.62 (13)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.7 (2) N2—N3—C9—C8 −0.14 (16)
C3—C4—C5—N1 178.15 (11) N2—N3—C9—C10 −179.55 (12)
N2—N1—C5—C4 −6.43 (19) C8—C9—C10—O3 105.27 (16)
C8—N1—C5—C4 175.08 (12) N3—C9—C10—O3 −75.46 (16)
N2—N1—C5—C6 173.44 (11)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1O···O2i 0.85 (1) 1.77 (2) 2.6119 (14) 173.(2)
O3—H3O···N3ii 0.85 (1) 1.96 (1) 2.7995 (16) 169 (2)
C6—H6···O3iii 0.95 2.60 3.5309 (19) 167
C8—H8···O3iii 0.95 2.23 3.1262 (18) 158

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y−1, −z+1; (ii) −x, −y+2, −z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5906).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  4. Himo, F., Lovell, T., Hilgraf, R., Rostovtsev, V. V., Noodleman, L., Sharpless, K. B. & Fokin, V. V. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 210–216. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. McCaroll, M. E. & Wandruzska, R. V. (1997). J. Fluoresc. 7, 185–193.
  6. Rostovtsev, V. V., Green, L. G., Fokin, V. V. & Sharpless, K. B. (2002). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2596–2699. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Ryu, E. H. & Zhao, Y. (2005). Org. Lett. 7, 1035–1037. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906sup1.cif

e-67-o1658-sup1.cif (16KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1658-Isup2.hkl (101.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022409/hb5906Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES