Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 30;67(Pt 7):m996. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811024019

catena-Poly[[diformatocopper(II)]-μ-1,4-bis­(imidazol-1-yl)benzene]

Bang Chen a,*
PMCID: PMC3151804  PMID: 21836967

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(CHO2)2(C12H10N4)], the CuII ion lies on an inversion center and is coordinated by two formate O atoms and two N atoms from two 1,4-bis­(imidazol-1-yl)phenyl ligands (L), forming a square-planar coordination environment. The linear mol­ecule L acts as a bidente bridging ligand, connecting the metal atoms into a chain along [101].

Related literature

For background to coordination polymers containing imidazole-derived ligands, see: Cui et al. (2005); Jin et al. (2008); Li et al. (2009). graphic file with name e-67-0m996-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(CHO2)2(C12H10N4)]

  • M r = 363.82

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.0971 (16) Å

  • b = 10.426 (2) Å

  • c = 8.5723 (17) Å

  • β = 107.02 (3)°

  • V = 692.0 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.61 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Mercury CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) T min = 0.624, T max = 0.725

  • 6003 measured reflections

  • 1204 independent reflections

  • 1108 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.026

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025

  • wR(F 2) = 0.075

  • S = 1.11

  • 1204 reflections

  • 106 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024019/rn2086sup1.cif

e-67-0m996-sup1.cif (14.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024019/rn2086Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m996-Isup2.hkl (59.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Imidazole has been extensively used in crystal engineering, and a large number of imidazole-containing flexible ligands have been extensively studied (Cui et al., 2005; Jin et al., 2008). However, to our knowledge, the research on imidazole ligands bearing rigid spacers is still less developed (Li et al., 2009). For the title compound, the geometry of the CuII ion is bound by two imidazole rings of individual L ligands and two formate ions forming a square planar coordination environment (Fig. 1). Notably, as shown in Fig. 2, the four-coordinate CuII center is bridged by the linear ligand L to form an infinite one-dimensional chain along the [101] direction.

Experimental

A mixture of CH3OH and H2O (1:1, 8 ml), as a buffer layer, was carefully layered over a solution of Cu(HCO2)2 in H2O (6 ml). Then a solution of 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-yl)phenyl (L, 0.06 mmol) in CH3OH (6 ml) was layered over the buffer layer, and the resultant reaction was left to stand at room temperature. After ca. three weeks, blue block single crystals appeared at the boundary. Yield: ~25% (based on L).

Refinement

C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined in the riding-model approximation, with C—H = 0.93Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq (C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radius (symmetry codes: A = 1-x, 1-y, -z; B = 1+x, y, -1+z; C = -x, 1-y, 1-z.).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing for (I).

Crystal data

[Cu(CHO2)2(C12H10N4)] F(000) = 370
Mr = 363.82 Dx = 1.746 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.0971 (16) Å Cell parameters from 2022 reflections
b = 10.426 (2) Å θ = 2.0–27.9°
c = 8.5723 (17) Å µ = 1.61 mm1
β = 107.02 (3)° T = 293 K
V = 692.0 (2) Å3 Block, blue
Z = 2 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD area-detector diffractometer 1204 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1108 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1 θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scans h = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.624, Tmax = 0.725 l = −10→10
6003 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.075 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0452P)2 + 0.4041P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1204 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
106 parameters Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.39 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.01074 (16)
O2 0.3615 (2) 0.73953 (14) −0.05814 (18) 0.0215 (4)
O1 0.55129 (17) 0.64376 (14) 0.15185 (16) 0.0154 (3)
N2 0.1326 (2) 0.44066 (17) 0.24042 (19) 0.0116 (4)
N1 0.3015 (2) 0.45187 (17) 0.0816 (2) 0.0128 (4)
C7 0.4602 (3) 0.73795 (19) 0.0823 (3) 0.0168 (4)
H7 0.4686 0.8130 0.1427 0.020*
C4 0.0645 (3) 0.4692 (2) 0.3731 (2) 0.0123 (4)
C3 0.0710 (2) 0.35192 (19) 0.1173 (2) 0.0142 (4)
H3 −0.0238 0.2981 0.1032 0.017*
C2 0.1769 (3) 0.35939 (19) 0.0218 (2) 0.0146 (4)
H2 0.1673 0.3097 −0.0706 0.018*
C6 −0.1121 (3) 0.4657 (2) 0.3490 (2) 0.0142 (4)
H6 −0.1864 0.4419 0.2482 0.017*
C1 0.2703 (3) 0.49981 (17) 0.2138 (3) 0.0112 (4)
H1 0.3340 0.5647 0.2786 0.013*
C5 0.1772 (3) 0.50202 (18) 0.5231 (3) 0.0144 (5)
H5 0.2957 0.5025 0.5382 0.017*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0110 (2) 0.0136 (2) 0.0095 (2) 0.00028 (12) 0.00592 (16) −0.00072 (12)
O2 0.0258 (8) 0.0209 (8) 0.0175 (8) 0.0000 (7) 0.0058 (6) 0.0008 (6)
O1 0.0144 (7) 0.0196 (8) 0.0142 (7) 0.0003 (6) 0.0073 (6) −0.0034 (6)
N2 0.0118 (8) 0.0144 (9) 0.0107 (8) 0.0009 (7) 0.0063 (7) 0.0008 (7)
N1 0.0144 (8) 0.0131 (8) 0.0123 (8) 0.0014 (7) 0.0062 (7) 0.0000 (7)
C7 0.0202 (10) 0.0138 (10) 0.0205 (11) −0.0035 (8) 0.0124 (9) −0.0034 (9)
C4 0.0158 (10) 0.0131 (9) 0.0104 (9) 0.0010 (8) 0.0077 (8) 0.0029 (8)
C3 0.0139 (9) 0.0150 (10) 0.0140 (9) −0.0027 (8) 0.0045 (8) −0.0008 (8)
C2 0.0181 (10) 0.0150 (10) 0.0117 (9) −0.0005 (8) 0.0059 (8) −0.0030 (8)
C6 0.0128 (10) 0.0216 (10) 0.0080 (9) −0.0016 (8) 0.0028 (8) −0.0006 (8)
C1 0.0115 (11) 0.0137 (10) 0.0098 (10) 0.0003 (7) 0.0050 (9) 0.0012 (7)
C5 0.0101 (10) 0.0201 (12) 0.0143 (11) −0.0004 (7) 0.0055 (9) 0.0014 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O1i 1.9485 (14) C7—H7 0.9300
Cu1—O1 1.9485 (14) C4—C5 1.384 (3)
Cu1—N1i 1.9953 (17) C4—C6 1.384 (3)
Cu1—N1 1.9953 (17) C3—C2 1.350 (3)
O2—C7 1.235 (3) C3—H3 0.9300
O1—C7 1.267 (3) C2—H2 0.9300
N2—C1 1.351 (3) C6—C5ii 1.390 (3)
N2—C3 1.382 (3) C6—H6 0.9300
N2—C4 1.433 (3) C1—H1 0.9300
N1—C1 1.329 (3) C5—C6ii 1.390 (3)
N1—C2 1.381 (3) C5—H5 0.9300
O1i—Cu1—O1 180.00 (8) C5—C4—N2 119.09 (19)
O1i—Cu1—N1i 89.73 (7) C6—C4—N2 119.75 (19)
O1—Cu1—N1i 90.27 (7) C2—C3—N2 105.86 (17)
O1i—Cu1—N1 90.27 (7) C2—C3—H3 127.1
O1—Cu1—N1 89.73 (7) N2—C3—H3 127.1
N1i—Cu1—N1 180.0 C3—C2—N1 109.86 (17)
C7—O1—Cu1 107.51 (12) C3—C2—H2 125.1
C1—N2—C3 107.92 (16) N1—C2—H2 125.1
C1—N2—C4 124.60 (17) C4—C6—C5ii 119.3 (2)
C3—N2—C4 127.48 (17) C4—C6—H6 120.4
C1—N1—C2 106.15 (17) C5ii—C6—H6 120.4
C1—N1—Cu1 125.33 (14) N1—C1—N2 110.19 (18)
C2—N1—Cu1 128.41 (13) N1—C1—H1 124.9
O2—C7—O1 126.19 (19) N2—C1—H1 124.9
O2—C7—H7 116.9 C4—C5—C6ii 119.6 (2)
O1—C7—H7 116.9 C4—C5—H5 120.2
C5—C4—C6 121.1 (2) C6ii—C5—H5 120.2
O1i—Cu1—O1—C7 −151.1 (3) C1—N2—C3—C2 1.1 (2)
N1i—Cu1—O1—C7 93.37 (13) C4—N2—C3—C2 −179.90 (19)
N1—Cu1—O1—C7 −86.63 (13) N2—C3—C2—N1 −0.7 (2)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C1 168.60 (17) C1—N1—C2—C3 0.1 (2)
O1—Cu1—N1—C1 −11.40 (17) Cu1—N1—C2—C3 176.50 (14)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C1 −7(100) C5—C4—C6—C5ii 1.2 (3)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C2 −7.16 (17) N2—C4—C6—C5ii −177.73 (18)
O1—Cu1—N1—C2 172.84 (17) C2—N1—C1—N2 0.6 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C2 177 (100) Cu1—N1—C1—N2 −175.95 (12)
Cu1—O1—C7—O2 −2.2 (3) C3—N2—C1—N1 −1.1 (2)
C1—N2—C4—C5 −35.7 (3) C4—N2—C1—N1 179.88 (17)
C3—N2—C4—C5 145.4 (2) C6—C4—C5—C6ii −1.2 (3)
C1—N2—C4—C6 143.3 (2) N2—C4—C5—C6ii 177.73 (18)
C3—N2—C4—C6 −35.6 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: RN2086).

References

  1. Cui, G. H., Li, J. R., Tian, J. L., Bu, X. H. & Batten, S. R. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 1775–1780.
  2. Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Jin, C. M., Wu, L. Y., Lu, H. & Xu, Y. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 215–218.
  4. Li, Z. X., Xu, Y., Zuo, Y., Li, L., Pan, Q., Hu, T. L. & Bu, X. H. (2009). Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 3904–3909.
  5. Rigaku/MSC (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024019/rn2086sup1.cif

e-67-0m996-sup1.cif (14.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024019/rn2086Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m996-Isup2.hkl (59.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES