Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 11;67(Pt 7):m871. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811021209

[1,2-Bis­(diisopropyl­phosphan­yl)ethane-κ2 P,P′]dichloridonickel(II)

Nahury Y Castellanos-Blanco a, Juventino J García a, Marcos Flores-Alamo a,*
PMCID: PMC3151871  PMID: 21836867

Abstract

In the crystal structure of title compound, [NiCl2(C14H32P2)], the NiII atom lies on a twofold rotation axis and shows a slightly distorted square-planar coordination geometry, with a dihedral angle of 10.01 (8)° between the cis-Cl—Ni—Cl and cis-P—Ni—P planes. There is no significant inter­molecular inter­action except very weak C—H⋯Cl inter­actions. The crystal studied was a racemic twin.

Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Scott et al. (1990). For applications of nickel complexes to catalytic systems, see: Vicic & Jones (1997); Arévalo & García (2010). For related structures, see: Cañavera-Buelvas et al. (2011); Angulo et al. (2003); Dahlenburg & Kurth (2001).graphic file with name e-67-0m871-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [NiCl2(C14H32P2)]

  • M r = 391.95

  • Tetragonal, Inline graphic

  • a = 14.2402 (2) Å

  • c = 18.4369 (7) Å

  • V = 3738.70 (16) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.48 mm−1

  • T = 122 K

  • 0.17 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Xcalibur Atlas Gemini diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010) T min = 0.975, T max = 0.989

  • 5823 measured reflections

  • 1850 independent reflections

  • 1547 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.030

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030

  • wR(F 2) = 0.070

  • S = 0.97

  • 1850 reflections

  • 92 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.80 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 832 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.53 (3)

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811021209/is2724sup1.cif

e-67-0m871-sup1.cif (15.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811021209/is2724Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m871-Isup2.hkl (89.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Ni1—P1 2.1600 (9)
Ni1—Cl1 2.2150 (8)

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3B⋯Cl1i 0.98 2.94 3.808 (4) 148
C5—H5A⋯Cl1ii 0.98 2.91 3.777 (4) 148

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We thank PAPIIT-DGAPA-UNAM (IN-201010) and CONACYT (080606) for their financial support of this work. We also thank Dr A. Arévalo for technical assistance.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The synthesis of the current complex [Ni (dippe)Cl2] was documented 21 years ago (Scott et al., 1990) and still the corresponding X-ray structure of this compound has not been reported. This type of nickel complexes are useful starting materials for the preparation of catalysts and catalytic precursors, for a series of active catalyst in a wide variety of model reactions (Vicic & Jones, 1997) and catalytic systems (Arévalo & García, 2010).

In the title complex, [Ni(dippe)Cl2], the NiII atom is coordinated by two P atoms of dippe ligand and two chloride anions (Fig. 1) into a slight distorted square-planar coordination geometry with a dihedral angle between the planes defined by the two cis-Cl–Ni–Cl and cis-P–Ni–P fragments [10.01 (8)°]. Additionally the NiII atom is situated 0.0837 (1) Å above the Cl1/P1/Cl1/P1 plane. These deviations from planarity, which can be attributed to some steric efect of the dippe ligand, are somewhat shorter than the distortion from ideal square-planar coordination geometry observed on [Ni (dippe)Cl2](carbazole)2 complex (Cañavera-Buelvas et al., 2011) with the NiCl2/NiP2 dihedral angle of 15.32° and somewhat larger than the distortion from ideal square-planar coordination geometry observed for related [Ni(dcpe)Cl2] (Angulo et al., 2003) and [(1S,2S)-C5H8{P(C6H11)2}2NiCl2] (Dahlenburg & Kurth, 2001) complexes, where the NiCl2/NiP2 dihedral angles of 3.96 and 5.37°, respectively.

In the crystal packing, there are two intermolecular contacts of the type hydrogen bond (Table 2) mainly between the carbon donor atom of the dippe to Cl1 chloride atom acceptor of the metallic complex, C5—H5A···Cl1 2.91 Å and C3—H3B···Cl1 2.94 Å.

Experimental

A concentrated THF solution of the complex [Ni(dippe)Cl2], prepared according to the reported procedure (Scott et al., 1990), was stored in a freezer at -30 °C. After a couple of days suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained. NMR (25 °C): 31P{1H} (CDCl3, 121.32 MHz, 25 °C): δ 85.9 (s). NMR 1H (CDCl3,300 MHz, 25 °C): δ 1.30 (m, CH3, 24H), 1.6 (m, CH2, 4H), 2.48 (m, CH, 4H). Elemental analysis experimental (calculated): C 43.0 (42.9), H 8.24% (8.23%).

Refinement

H atoms attached to C atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions, and refined as riding on their parent atoms, with C—H distances fixed to 0.98 (methyl CH3), 0.99 (methylene CH2) and 1.00 Å (methine CH), and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl C) or 1.2Ueq(C). The crystal studied was a racemic twin; the minor twin component refined to 47 (3)%.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as circles of arbitrary size.

Crystal data

[NiCl2(C14H32P2)] Dx = 1.393 Mg m3
Mr = 391.95 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I4c2 Cell parameters from 3046 reflections
a = 14.2402 (2) Å θ = 3.4–26.0°
c = 18.4369 (7) Å µ = 1.48 mm1
V = 3738.70 (16) Å3 T = 122 K
Z = 8 Prism, brown
F(000) = 1664 0.17 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Oxford Xcalibur Atlas Gemini diffractometer 1850 independent reflections
graphite 1547 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.4685 pixels mm-1 Rint = 0.030
ω scans θmax = 26.1°, θmin = 3.4°
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010) h = −16→17
Tmin = 0.975, Tmax = 0.989 k = −17→17
5823 measured reflections l = −22→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.070 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0391P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.97 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1850 reflections Δρmax = 0.80 e Å3
92 parameters Δρmin = −0.23 e Å3
0 restraints Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 832 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Flack parameter: 0.53 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.5579 (3) 0.2802 (2) 0.4018 (2) 0.0423 (9)
H1 0.5088 0.2434 0.3754 0.051*
C2 0.5856 (3) 0.3616 (3) 0.3527 (3) 0.0708 (15)
H2A 0.5296 0.3982 0.3403 0.106*
H2B 0.6144 0.3371 0.3083 0.106*
H2C 0.6307 0.4019 0.3781 0.106*
C3 0.5142 (3) 0.3145 (3) 0.4703 (2) 0.0580 (13)
H3A 0.5614 0.3477 0.4993 0.087*
H3B 0.49 0.261 0.498 0.087*
H3C 0.4625 0.3573 0.4588 0.087*
C4 0.7002 (3) 0.1639 (3) 0.33272 (17) 0.0457 (10)
H4 0.7238 0.2221 0.3086 0.055*
C5 0.6214 (3) 0.1240 (3) 0.2847 (2) 0.0676 (12)
H5A 0.6454 0.1136 0.2355 0.101*
H5B 0.569 0.1686 0.283 0.101*
H5C 0.5995 0.0642 0.3049 0.101*
C6 0.7832 (3) 0.0972 (3) 0.3400 (2) 0.0554 (12)
H6A 0.7648 0.043 0.3695 0.083*
H6B 0.8356 0.1299 0.3634 0.083*
H6C 0.8025 0.0757 0.2918 0.083*
C7 0.5952 (2) 0.0942 (2) 0.45870 (15) 0.0292 (6)
H7A 0.5299 0.0924 0.4404 0.035*
H7B 0.6277 0.0369 0.4416 0.035*
P1 0.65506 (6) 0.19836 (6) 0.42220 (5) 0.0280 (2)
Cl1 0.83890 (6) 0.31965 (6) 0.58688 (5) 0.0349 (2)
Ni1 0.75392 (2) 0.25392 (2) 0.5 0.02082 (13)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0335 (19) 0.0391 (19) 0.054 (3) −0.0022 (16) −0.0121 (19) 0.0064 (18)
C2 0.053 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.099 (4) 0.003 (2) −0.009 (3) 0.038 (3)
C3 0.039 (2) 0.050 (2) 0.085 (4) 0.0139 (18) −0.001 (2) −0.006 (2)
C4 0.064 (3) 0.046 (2) 0.0270 (18) −0.019 (2) 0.0057 (17) −0.0057 (17)
C5 0.090 (4) 0.074 (4) 0.039 (2) −0.015 (2) −0.013 (2) −0.016 (2)
C6 0.067 (3) 0.042 (2) 0.057 (3) −0.004 (2) 0.022 (2) −0.013 (2)
C7 0.0251 (18) 0.0270 (19) 0.0355 (16) −0.0077 (12) −0.0012 (17) −0.0046 (17)
P1 0.0269 (4) 0.0268 (4) 0.0303 (5) −0.0055 (3) −0.0020 (4) 0.0005 (4)
Cl1 0.0306 (4) 0.0344 (5) 0.0397 (5) −0.0094 (3) −0.0042 (4) −0.0077 (4)
Ni1 0.01688 (15) 0.01688 (15) 0.0287 (3) −0.00262 (17) 0.00055 (18) −0.00055 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—C3 1.491 (5) C5—H5A 0.98
C1—C2 1.522 (6) C5—H5B 0.98
C1—P1 1.847 (3) C5—H5C 0.98
C1—H1 1.00 C6—H6A 0.98
C2—H2A 0.98 C6—H6B 0.98
C2—H2B 0.98 C6—H6C 0.98
C2—H2C 0.98 C7—C7i 1.523 (6)
C3—H3A 0.98 C7—P1 1.838 (3)
C3—H3B 0.98 C7—H7A 0.99
C3—H3C 0.98 C7—H7B 0.99
C4—C6 1.522 (6) P1—Ni1 2.1600 (9)
C4—C5 1.538 (5) Cl1—Ni1 2.2150 (8)
C4—P1 1.837 (3) Ni1—P1i 2.1600 (9)
C4—H4 1.00 Ni1—Cl1i 2.2150 (8)
C3—C1—C2 111.2 (3) C4—C5—H5C 109.5
C3—C1—P1 110.3 (3) H5A—C5—H5C 109.5
C2—C1—P1 114.0 (3) H5B—C5—H5C 109.5
C3—C1—H1 107 C4—C6—H6A 109.5
C2—C1—H1 107 C4—C6—H6B 109.5
P1—C1—H1 107 H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
C1—C2—H2A 109.5 C4—C6—H6C 109.5
C1—C2—H2B 109.5 H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
H2A—C2—H2B 109.5 H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
C1—C2—H2C 109.5 C7i—C7—P1 111.27 (13)
H2A—C2—H2C 109.5 C7i—C7—H7A 109.4
H2B—C2—H2C 109.5 P1—C7—H7A 109.4
C1—C3—H3A 109.5 C7i—C7—H7B 109.4
C1—C3—H3B 109.5 P1—C7—H7B 109.4
H3A—C3—H3B 109.5 H7A—C7—H7B 108
C1—C3—H3C 109.5 C4—P1—C7 105.97 (15)
H3A—C3—H3C 109.5 C4—P1—C1 104.33 (18)
H3B—C3—H3C 109.5 C7—P1—C1 103.68 (17)
C6—C4—C5 112.7 (4) C4—P1—Ni1 117.79 (14)
C6—C4—P1 111.0 (3) C7—P1—Ni1 110.76 (10)
C5—C4—P1 111.1 (3) C1—P1—Ni1 113.10 (12)
C6—C4—H4 107.2 P1—Ni1—P1i 87.91 (5)
C5—C4—H4 107.2 P1—Ni1—Cl1 172.36 (3)
P1—C4—H4 107.2 P1i—Ni1—Cl1 89.73 (3)
C4—C5—H5A 109.5 P1—Ni1—Cl1i 89.73 (3)
C4—C5—H5B 109.5 P1i—Ni1—Cl1i 172.36 (3)
H5A—C5—H5B 109.5 Cl1—Ni1—Cl1i 93.51 (5)
C6—C4—P1—C7 −72.2 (3) C2—C1—P1—C7 −164.7 (3)
C5—C4—P1—C7 54.2 (3) C3—C1—P1—Ni1 −50.7 (3)
C6—C4—P1—C1 178.8 (3) C2—C1—P1—Ni1 75.3 (3)
C5—C4—P1—C1 −54.9 (3) C4—P1—Ni1—P1i −129.91 (14)
C6—C4—P1—Ni1 52.4 (3) C7—P1—Ni1—P1i −7.74 (12)
C5—C4—P1—Ni1 178.8 (3) C1—P1—Ni1—P1i 108.15 (14)
C7i—C7—P1—C4 153.8 (3) C4—P1—Ni1—Cl1 158.0 (3)
C7i—C7—P1—C1 −96.6 (4) C7—P1—Ni1—Cl1 −79.9 (3)
C7i—C7—P1—Ni1 25.0 (4) C1—P1—Ni1—Cl1 36.0 (3)
C3—C1—P1—C4 −179.9 (3) C4—P1—Ni1—Cl1i 42.82 (14)
C2—C1—P1—C4 −53.9 (4) C7—P1—Ni1—Cl1i 164.99 (13)
C3—C1—P1—C7 69.4 (3) C1—P1—Ni1—Cl1i −79.12 (14)

Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C3—H3B···Cl1ii 0.98 2.94 3.808 (4) 148
C5—H5A···Cl1iii 0.98 2.91 3.777 (4) 148

Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (iii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IS2724).

References

  1. Angulo, I. M., Bouwman, E., van Gorkum, R., Lok, S. M., Lutz, M. & Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 202, 97–106.
  2. Arévalo, A. & García, J. J. (2010). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 4063–4074.
  3. Cañavera-Buelvas, F., Flores-Alamo, M. & García, J. J. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Dahlenburg, L. & Kurth, V. (2001). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 319, 176–182.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  6. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.
  7. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  8. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.
  9. Oxford Diffraction (2010). CrysAlis PRO Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.
  10. Scott, F., Krüger, C. & Betz, P. (1990). J. Organomet. Chem. 387, 113–121.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Vicic, D. A. & Jones, W. D. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 10855–10856.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811021209/is2724sup1.cif

e-67-0m871-sup1.cif (15.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811021209/is2724Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m871-Isup2.hkl (89.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES