Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 30;67(Pt 7):m1002. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811023026

Poly[(μ5-3,5-dinitro­benzoato)rubidium]

Yanqing Miao a,*, Xiaoqing Zhang a, Chunye Liu a
PMCID: PMC3151889  PMID: 21836829

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Rb(C7H3N2O6)]n, comprises an Rb cation and a 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anion. The Rb cation is eight-coordinated by O atoms from five 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anions. On the other hand, each 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anion links five Rb cations with the carboxyl­ate groups as μ3-bridging. The metal atom is firstly linked by the carboxyl­ate groups into a chain along the c-axis direction, which is further linked by bonds between the Rb and nitro O atoms, giving a three-dimensional framework.

Related literature

For 3,5-dinitro­benzoate complexes, see: Askarinejad et al. (2007); Madej et al. (2007). For Rb—O bond lengths, see: Cametti et al. (2005).graphic file with name e-67-m1002-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Rb(C7H3N2O6)]

  • M r = 296.58

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.2789 (15) Å

  • b = 18.072 (4) Å

  • c = 7.3652 (14) Å

  • β = 91.70 (3)°

  • V = 968.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 5.13 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.64 × 0.40 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.396, T max = 1.000

  • 4663 measured reflections

  • 896 independent reflections

  • 760 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.053

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033

  • wR(F 2) = 0.078

  • S = 1.06

  • 896 reflections

  • 75 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811023026/go2012sup1.cif

e-67-m1002-sup1.cif (13.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811023026/go2012Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1002-Isup2.hkl (44.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by grants from the Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Province Department of Health (2010D54), the Natural Science Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Science and Technology Department (SJ08B19) and the Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Education Department (09 J K709). Jing You is thanked for helping to improve the English.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the coordination chemistry of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid, it has been found that the 3,5-dinitrobenzoate moiety functions as a multidentate ligand (Askarinejad et al., 2007; Madej et al., 2007) with versatile binding and coordination modes. In this paper, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, a new Rb complex obtained by the reaction of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid and RbOH in water.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound comprises a Rb cation and a 3,5-dinitrobenzoate anion. Rb cation lies on and the dinitrobenzoate is centred upon crystallographic twofold axes. The Rb cation is coordinated to eight O atoms from five 3,5-dinitrobenzoate anions (Fig. 1) with the Rb—O distances ranging from 2.761 (2) Å to 3.124 (4) Å, which are well within the range reported in the literature (Cametti et al., 2005). The Rb centre is firstly linked by the carboxylic groups to give a one-dimensional chain along the c-axis direction, which is further linked by the phenyl groups to give a three-dimensional framework of the title compound (Fig. 2).

Experimental

3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid and RbOH were commercially available and used without further purification. To asolution of 10 mmol 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid in 30 ml bidistilled water, a solution of 10 mmol RbOH in 20 ml bidistilled water was added dropwise at room temperature. After vigorous stirring for 1 h, the resulting solution was then evaporated to a volume of about 15 ml in vacuum and filtered hot. The filtrate was then set aside for crystallization at room temperature. Three weeks later, colorless prism crystals of the titlecompound suitable for X-ray determination were isolated.

Refinement

Carbon-bound H atoms were placed at calculated positions and were treated as riding on the parent C atoms with C – H = 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The structure of (I), showing the atomic numbering scheme. Non-H atoms are shown with 30% probability displacement ellipsoids. Symmetry codes: (i) 1.5 - x, y, 1 - z; (ii) x, 1.5 - y, -1/2 + z; (iii) 0.5 - x, 1.5 - y, 1.5 - z; (iv) 0.5 - x, y, 1 - z; (v) -1/2 + x, 1 - y, z; (vi) 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The three-dimensional framework of (I).

Crystal data

[Rb(C7H3N2O6)] F(000) = 576
Mr = 296.58 Dx = 2.034 Mg m3
Monoclinic, I2/a Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -I 2ya Cell parameters from 1610 reflections
a = 7.2789 (15) Å θ = 3.0–25.4°
b = 18.072 (4) Å µ = 5.13 mm1
c = 7.3652 (14) Å T = 293 K
β = 91.70 (3)° Prism, colorless
V = 968.4 (3) Å3 0.64 × 0.40 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer 896 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 760 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.053
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 1.000 k = −21→20
4663 measured reflections l = −8→7

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.078 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0418P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
896 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
75 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.55 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Rb1 0.2500 0.54657 (2) 0.5000 0.0557 (2)
C1 0.7500 0.8732 (3) 0.5000 0.0493 (11)
H1A 0.7500 0.9246 0.5000 0.059*
C2 0.6036 (4) 0.83316 (17) 0.5606 (4) 0.0451 (8)
C3 0.5991 (4) 0.75684 (17) 0.5597 (4) 0.0421 (7)
H3A 0.4961 0.7316 0.5986 0.050*
C4 0.7500 0.7185 (2) 0.5000 0.0387 (10)
C5 0.7500 0.6342 (2) 0.5000 0.0398 (10)
N1 0.4460 (5) 0.87295 (16) 0.6344 (4) 0.0595 (8)
O1 0.6019 (3) 0.60328 (12) 0.5293 (4) 0.0649 (7)
O2 0.3212 (4) 0.83742 (15) 0.6978 (4) 0.0696 (7)
O3 0.4500 (5) 0.94073 (15) 0.6317 (5) 0.0913 (11)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Rb1 0.0317 (3) 0.0382 (3) 0.0985 (4) 0.000 0.0213 (2) 0.000
C1 0.066 (3) 0.040 (2) 0.043 (3) 0.000 0.004 (2) 0.000
C2 0.0482 (19) 0.0444 (17) 0.0429 (17) 0.0112 (15) 0.0053 (14) 0.0032 (14)
C3 0.0381 (17) 0.0441 (16) 0.0441 (17) 0.0020 (15) 0.0020 (13) 0.0032 (14)
C4 0.035 (2) 0.042 (2) 0.039 (2) 0.000 −0.0038 (18) 0.000
C5 0.028 (2) 0.035 (2) 0.056 (3) 0.000 −0.0009 (19) 0.000
N1 0.068 (2) 0.0532 (18) 0.0576 (18) 0.0181 (16) 0.0117 (15) 0.0056 (15)
O1 0.0359 (13) 0.0414 (12) 0.118 (2) −0.0037 (11) 0.0118 (13) 0.0012 (13)
O2 0.0555 (16) 0.0686 (17) 0.0860 (18) 0.0089 (13) 0.0222 (14) −0.0045 (14)
O3 0.113 (3) 0.0515 (15) 0.112 (2) 0.0326 (16) 0.049 (2) 0.0202 (16)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Rb1—O1 2.761 (2) C1—C2 1.374 (4)
Rb1—O1i 2.925 (2) C1—C2iii 1.374 (4)
Rb1—O2ii 3.113 (3) C1—H1A 0.9300
Rb1—O3ii 3.125 (3) C2—C3 1.380 (4)
O1—Rb1—O1iv 136.43 (9) C1—C2—C3 122.9 (3)
O1—Rb1—O1i 132.92 (7) C1—C2—N1 118.9 (3)
O1iv—Rb1—O1i 90.36 (6) C3—C2—N1 118.2 (3)
O1i—Rb1—O1v 44.43 (9) C2—C3—C4 118.9 (3)
O1—Rb1—O2ii 82.42 (8) C2—C3—H3A 120.5
O1iv—Rb1—O2ii 68.41 (8) C4—C3—H3A 120.5
O1i—Rb1—O2ii 120.08 (7) C3iii—C4—C3 119.9 (4)
O1v—Rb1—O2ii 138.23 (8) C3—C4—C5 120.07 (19)
O2ii—Rb1—O2vi 95.32 (11) O1—C5—O1iii 126.3 (4)
O1—Rb1—O3ii 111.10 (10) O1—C5—C4 116.83 (19)
O1iv—Rb1—O3ii 65.51 (9) O1iii—C5—C4 116.83 (19)
O1i—Rb1—O3ii 79.74 (8) O2—N1—O3 123.5 (3)
O1v—Rb1—O3ii 108.31 (7) O2—N1—C2 118.9 (3)
O2ii—Rb1—O3ii 40.35 (7) O3—N1—C2 117.6 (3)
O2vi—Rb1—O3ii 131.54 (7) C5—O1—Rb1 164.54 (19)
O2ii—Rb1—O3vi 131.54 (8) C5—O1—Rb1v 94.6 (2)
O3ii—Rb1—O3vi 171.57 (10) Rb1—O1—Rb1v 89.64 (6)
C2—C1—C2iii 116.5 (4) N1—O2—Rb1ii 93.5 (2)
C2—C1—H1A 121.8 N1—O3—Rb1ii 92.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—O1 10.3 (2) C3—C2—N1—O2 2.7 (5)
C3iii—C4—C5—O1 −169.7 (2) C1—C2—N1—O3 2.8 (4)
C1—C2—N1—O2 −175.8 (3) C3—C2—N1—O3 −178.8 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1, z; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+3/2; (iii) −x+3/2, y, −z+1; (iv) −x+1/2, y, −z+1; (v) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (vi) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GO2012).

References

  1. Askarinejad, A., Fadaei, M. R., Morsali, A. & Mahjoub, A. R. (2007). J. Coord. Chem. 60, 753–761.
  2. Bruker (2002). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Cametti, M., Nissinen, M., Cort, A. D., Mandolini, L. & Rissanen, K. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3831–3837. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Madej, A., Oleksyn, B. J. & Śliwiński, J. (2007). Pol. J. Chem. 81, 1201–1218.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811023026/go2012sup1.cif

e-67-m1002-sup1.cif (13.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811023026/go2012Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1002-Isup2.hkl (44.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES