Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 18;67(Pt 7):m957–m958. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811020939

catena-[[(nitrato-κO)silver(I)]-μ-1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione-κ4 O,O′:N,N′]

Xiao Jing a, Yu-Lan Zhu b,*, Kui-Rong Ma b, Li Cao b, Shuai Shao a
PMCID: PMC3151901  PMID: 21836936

Abstract

In the title one-dimensional coordination polymer, [Ag(NO3)(C12H6N2O2)]n, the AgI atom is penta­coordinated by two N atoms from a 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phen-dione) ligand, one O atom from the nitrate anion and two O atoms from another phen-dione ligand. The coordination environment around silver is slightly distorted square-pyramidal. Inter­estingly, the Ag—O distances to the phen-dione ligand are different [Ag—O = 2.612 (6) and 2.470 (5) Å]. The one-dimensional chains run parallel to [101] and are further inter­connected by weak hydrogen bonds (C—H⋯O) and π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid distances 3.950 (4) and 3.792 (4) Å], forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular network.

Related literature

For the use of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phen-dione) as an efficient chelating ligand establishing coordination polymers, see: Calderazzo et al. (2002); Wu et al. (1996); Liu & Xu (2006); Li et al. (2005). For examples of complexes with N,O-coordination of phen-dione, see: Paw & Eisenberg (1997); Ruiz et al. (1999); Shavaleev et al. (2003). For the synthesis of phen-dione, see: Paw & Eisenberg (1997). For the structure of a related phen-dione complex of AgI, see: Onuegbu et al. (2009). For a comparison of Ag—O bond lengths, see: Young & Hanton (2008); Sun et al. (2010); Wang et al. (2011).graphic file with name e-67-0m957-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Ag(NO3)(C12H6N2O2)]

  • M r = 380.07

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.5058 (14) Å

  • b = 10.4647 (15) Å

  • c = 12.1615 (17) Å

  • β = 99.766 (2)°

  • V = 1192.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.72 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) T min = 0.66, T max = 0.84

  • 6626 measured reflections

  • 2307 independent reflections

  • 1374 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.041

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052

  • wR(F 2) = 0.124

  • S = 1.00

  • 2307 reflections

  • 190 parameters

  • 32 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.84 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.05 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020939/im2282sup1.cif

e-67-0m957-sup1.cif (15.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020939/im2282Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m957-Isup2.hkl (113.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C1—H1⋯O4i 0.93 2.37 3.21 (1) 149

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 20671038 and 20975043) and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Chemistry of Low-Dimensional Materials (grant No. JSKC09061).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

1, 10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phen-dione) is an efficient chelating ligand exhibiting two types of coordinating atoms (N and O) that are electronically coupled due to conjugation throughout the ligand. While phen-dione usually binds to metals through N atoms, in some cases both the N and O atoms are used simultaneously (Paw & Eisenberg,1997; Ruiz et al., 1999; Shavaleev et al., 2003).

In this paper we report the synthesis and characterization of the title compound, [Ag(phen-dione)(NO3)]n (1). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of 1 reveals the asymmetric unit to consist of one Ag (I) ion, one phen-dione ligand and one nitrate anion (Fig. 1). The silver atom is coordinated to two N atoms of a 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phen-dione), one O atom from the nitrate anion and two O atoms from another phen-dione ligand giving rise to a slightly distorted square-pyramidal coordination sphere. The corresponding Ag–N bond distances are 2.445 (6) Å for Ag–N(1), 2.287 (6) Å for Ag–N(2) and Ag–O bond distances are observed to 2.474 (6) Å for Ag–O(1 A), 2.438 (7) Å for Ag–O(3) and 2.612 (6) Å for Ag–O(2 A). The latter bond length is longer than Ag–O(1 A) and Ag–O(3), but is well–matched to other examples reported in the literature (Young & Hanton, 2008; Wang et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2010).

In compound 1, the basic building units with a [AgN2O3]center are firstly interconnected to each other to produce a one-dimensional chain by additional Ag—O(1 A) and Ag—O(2 A) bonds (Fig. 2). Then the adjacent one-dimensional chains are further linked to each other to form three-dimensional network structure by the weak hydrogen bond C (1)–H(1)···O(4) (3.184 Å) between a CH function of a pyridine and an oxygen atom of the nitrate anion and π–π stacking interactions (Fig. 3). Two types of aromatic stacking interactions in 1 are observed between pyridine ring I (N (1), C (10), C (9), C (8), C (7), C (11)) and pyridine ring II (N (1), C (10), C (9), C (8), C (7), C (11)). There is one close distance between the centroids of pyridine I and II and another between two neighboring pyridine I moieties. The respective centroid-to-centroid distances are 3.950 (4) Å and 3.792 (4) Å.

The combination of coordinative bonds, hydrogen bonds, and π–π stacking interactions assemble the one-dimensional chain into a complicated three-dimensional supramolecular network.

Experimental

The title compound was synthesized according to the following steps: a solution of silver (I) nitrate (0.068 g, 0.4 mmol) and phen-dione (0.0212 g, 0.1 mmol) in methanol (8 ml) was stirred for 2 h. After filtering, the filtrate was left at room temperature for about two weeks. Yellow block shaped crystals of 1 were collected by vacuum filtration, washed thoroughly with methanol dried in air (yield 23% based on silver).

Refinement

All non-hydrogen atoms were located from the difference Fourier maps, and were refined anisotropically. All H atoms were positioned geometrically, and were allowed to ride on their corresponding parent atoms with Uiso = 1.2 Ueq.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound, displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

One-dimensional polymeric structure of the title compound.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Crystal packing of the title compound, π–π stacking interactions are shown as green dashed lines and hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashed lines.

Crystal data

[Ag(NO3)(C12H6N2O2)] F(000) = 744
Mr = 380.07 Dx = 2.117 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 1252 reflections
a = 9.5058 (14) Å θ = 2.6–22.6°
b = 10.4647 (15) Å µ = 1.72 mm1
c = 12.1615 (17) Å T = 296 K
β = 99.766 (2)° Block, yellow
V = 1192.2 (3) Å3 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 2307 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1374 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.041
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1 θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.6°
φ and ω scans h = −11→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 2000) k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.66, Tmax = 0.84 l = −14→7
6626 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.124 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0445P)2 + 3.5057P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2307 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
190 parameters Δρmax = 0.84 e Å3
32 restraints Δρmin = −1.05 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ag1 0.20025 (7) 0.15378 (7) 0.49084 (6) 0.0703 (3)
C1 0.3824 (8) −0.0492 (8) 0.3745 (6) 0.055 (2)
H1 0.3348 −0.1065 0.4136 0.066*
C2 0.4710 (9) −0.0969 (8) 0.3058 (7) 0.060 (2)
H2 0.4815 −0.1846 0.2981 0.072*
C3 0.5436 (8) −0.0134 (7) 0.2488 (6) 0.0489 (19)
H3 0.6034 −0.0437 0.2015 0.059*
C4 0.5264 (7) 0.1159 (6) 0.2628 (6) 0.0399 (17)
C5 0.6048 (7) 0.2087 (6) 0.2031 (6) 0.0449 (18)
C6 0.5831 (7) 0.3489 (6) 0.2189 (5) 0.0416 (16)
C7 0.4826 (7) 0.3887 (7) 0.2938 (5) 0.0391 (17)
C8 0.4591 (7) 0.5165 (7) 0.3107 (6) 0.0485 (19)
H8 0.5058 0.5787 0.2758 0.058*
C9 0.3654 (8) 0.5503 (8) 0.3800 (6) 0.053 (2)
H9 0.3460 0.6358 0.3918 0.064*
C10 0.3008 (8) 0.4552 (8) 0.4318 (6) 0.056 (2)
H10 0.2393 0.4790 0.4801 0.067*
C11 0.4114 (7) 0.2975 (6) 0.3479 (5) 0.0356 (16)
C12 0.4337 (7) 0.1596 (7) 0.3331 (5) 0.0380 (15)
N1 0.3214 (6) 0.3316 (6) 0.4165 (5) 0.0439 (14)
N2 0.3618 (6) 0.0775 (6) 0.3874 (5) 0.0424 (14)
N3 −0.1319 (8) 0.2293 (8) 0.4504 (7) 0.0784 (15)
O1 0.6449 (5) 0.4259 (5) 0.1699 (4) 0.0567 (14)
O2 0.6867 (6) 0.1721 (5) 0.1428 (5) 0.0708 (17)
O3 −0.0348 (6) 0.2265 (7) 0.3995 (6) 0.0846 (15)
O4 −0.1158 (8) 0.1860 (9) 0.5450 (7) 0.126 (2)
O5 −0.2488 (6) 0.2729 (7) 0.4152 (5) 0.0896 (18)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ag1 0.0779 (5) 0.0783 (5) 0.0691 (5) 0.0005 (4) 0.0539 (4) −0.0004 (4)
C1 0.062 (5) 0.052 (5) 0.057 (5) −0.006 (4) 0.027 (4) 0.012 (4)
C2 0.066 (5) 0.047 (5) 0.071 (6) 0.003 (4) 0.023 (5) 0.004 (4)
C3 0.048 (4) 0.052 (5) 0.051 (5) 0.008 (4) 0.017 (4) −0.006 (4)
C4 0.040 (4) 0.042 (4) 0.040 (4) 0.007 (3) 0.016 (3) −0.004 (3)
C5 0.047 (4) 0.052 (5) 0.041 (4) 0.001 (3) 0.022 (4) 0.001 (3)
C6 0.040 (4) 0.053 (4) 0.035 (4) −0.006 (4) 0.015 (3) 0.002 (4)
C7 0.040 (4) 0.047 (4) 0.034 (4) −0.003 (3) 0.016 (3) 0.001 (3)
C8 0.053 (4) 0.046 (5) 0.051 (5) −0.002 (4) 0.020 (4) 0.004 (4)
C9 0.069 (5) 0.042 (4) 0.053 (5) 0.009 (4) 0.019 (4) −0.004 (4)
C10 0.062 (5) 0.064 (6) 0.048 (5) 0.012 (4) 0.027 (4) −0.002 (4)
C11 0.038 (4) 0.042 (4) 0.029 (4) 0.005 (3) 0.013 (3) −0.004 (3)
C12 0.036 (3) 0.045 (4) 0.035 (4) −0.003 (3) 0.011 (3) −0.003 (3)
N1 0.045 (3) 0.045 (4) 0.047 (4) 0.003 (3) 0.024 (3) −0.002 (3)
N2 0.044 (3) 0.042 (4) 0.045 (3) 0.001 (3) 0.019 (3) 0.003 (3)
N3 0.054 (3) 0.111 (4) 0.077 (3) 0.003 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.021 (3)
O1 0.059 (3) 0.058 (3) 0.062 (3) −0.008 (3) 0.034 (3) 0.002 (3)
O2 0.088 (4) 0.066 (4) 0.075 (4) 0.012 (3) 0.062 (3) 0.003 (3)
O3 0.061 (3) 0.108 (4) 0.092 (3) 0.006 (3) 0.036 (3) 0.009 (3)
O4 0.095 (4) 0.188 (5) 0.092 (4) −0.022 (4) 0.012 (3) 0.058 (4)
O5 0.059 (3) 0.131 (5) 0.078 (4) 0.022 (3) 0.010 (3) −0.017 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ag1—N2 2.287 (5) C6—C7 1.487 (8)
Ag1—O3 2.442 (6) C7—C8 1.377 (10)
Ag1—N1 2.442 (6) C7—C11 1.397 (9)
Ag1—O1i 2.470 (5) C8—C9 1.372 (10)
C1—N2 1.354 (10) C8—H8 0.9300
C1—C2 1.376 (10) C9—C10 1.376 (10)
C1—H1 0.9300 C9—H9 0.9300
C2—C3 1.372 (10) C10—N1 1.326 (9)
C2—H2 0.9300 C10—H10 0.9300
C3—C4 1.377 (9) C11—N1 1.341 (7)
C3—H3 0.9300 C11—C12 1.474 (10)
C4—C12 1.405 (8) C12—N2 1.340 (8)
C4—C5 1.486 (9) N3—O3 1.195 (8)
C5—O2 1.218 (7) N3—O5 1.210 (9)
C5—C6 1.499 (7) N3—O4 1.222 (9)
C6—O1 1.211 (7) O1—Ag1ii 2.470 (5)
N2—Ag1—O3 120.4 (2) C9—C8—C7 118.7 (7)
N2—Ag1—N1 70.10 (19) C9—C8—H8 120.6
O3—Ag1—N1 92.7 (2) C7—C8—H8 120.6
N2—Ag1—O1i 129.06 (19) C8—C9—C10 118.8 (7)
O3—Ag1—O1i 101.00 (18) C8—C9—H9 120.6
N1—Ag1—O1i 140.18 (19) C10—C9—H9 120.6
N2—C1—C2 122.8 (7) N1—C10—C9 123.5 (6)
N2—C1—H1 118.6 N1—C10—H10 118.2
C2—C1—H1 118.6 C9—C10—H10 118.2
C1—C2—C3 119.2 (7) N1—C11—C7 121.5 (6)
C1—C2—H2 120.4 N1—C11—C12 117.2 (6)
C3—C2—H2 120.4 C7—C11—C12 121.3 (6)
C2—C3—C4 118.9 (7) N2—C12—C4 121.1 (6)
C2—C3—H3 120.6 N2—C12—C11 118.1 (5)
C4—C3—H3 120.6 C4—C12—C11 120.8 (6)
C3—C4—C12 119.7 (7) C10—N1—C11 118.2 (6)
C3—C4—C5 120.1 (6) C10—N1—Ag1 127.0 (4)
C12—C4—C5 120.2 (6) C11—N1—Ag1 114.7 (4)
O2—C5—C4 120.9 (6) C12—N2—C1 118.3 (6)
O2—C5—C6 120.0 (6) C12—N2—Ag1 119.6 (4)
C4—C5—C6 119.1 (5) C1—N2—Ag1 122.0 (4)
O1—C6—C7 122.1 (6) O3—N3—O5 124.7 (9)
O1—C6—C5 119.9 (6) O3—N3—O4 119.6 (9)
C7—C6—C5 118.0 (6) O5—N3—O4 115.7 (8)
C8—C7—C11 119.3 (6) C6—O1—Ag1ii 113.8 (4)
C8—C7—C6 120.0 (6) N3—O3—Ag1 120.0 (6)
C11—C7—C6 120.7 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C1—H1···O4iii 0.93 2.37 3.21 (1) 149.

Symmetry codes: (iii) −x, −y, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IM2282).

References

  1. Bruker (2000). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bruker (2004). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Calderazzo, F., Pampaloni, G. & Passarelli, V. (2002). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 330, 136–142.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  5. Li, X., Cao, R., Bi, W. H., Yuan, D. Q. & Sun, D. F. (2005). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3156–3166.
  6. Liu, Q. Y. & Xu, L. (2006). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1620–1628.
  7. Onuegbu, J., Butcher, R. J., Hosten, C., Udeochu, U. C. & Bakare, O. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m1119–m1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Paw, W. & Eisenberg, R. (1997). Inorg. Chem. 36, 2287–2293. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Ruiz, R., Caneschi, A., Gatteschi, D., Gaspar, A. B., Real, J. A., Fernandez, I. & Munoz, M. C. (1999). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2, 521–523.
  10. Shavaleev, N. M., Moorcraft, L. P., Pope, S. J. A., Bell, Z. R., Faulkner, S. & Ward, M. D. (2003). Chem. Commun. pp. 1134–1135. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, D., Zhang, N., Huang, R. B. & Zheng, L. S. (2010). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 3699–3709.
  14. Wang, H., Yuan, G., Sun, C. & Yang, G. C. (2011). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 14, 347–350.
  15. Wu, Q., Maskus, M., Pariente, F., Tobalina, F. & Fernandez, V. M. (1996). Anal. Chem. 68, 3688–3696.
  16. Young, A. G. & Hanton, L. R. (2008). Coord. Chem. Rev. 252, 1346–1386.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020939/im2282sup1.cif

e-67-0m957-sup1.cif (15.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020939/im2282Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m957-Isup2.hkl (113.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES