Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jun 18;67(Pt 7):m925. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811022227

Dicarbonyl­dichlorido(N,N,N′,N′-tetra­methyl­ethylenediamine)­ruthenium(II)

Ahmad O Baghlaf a, Muhammad Ishaq a, Salih S Al-Juaid a, Abdullah M Asiri b,, Muhammad Nadeem Arshad c,*
PMCID: PMC3152070  PMID: 21836909

Abstract

In the title compound, [RuCl2(C6H16N2)(CO)2], the geometry around the RuII atom is a distorted RuC2N2Cl2 octa­hedron, with pairs of C and Cl atoms trans to each other and the N atoms of the bidentate ligand in a cis conformation. The five-membered chelate ring is puckered on the C—C bond.

Related literature

For background to ruthenium carbonyl derivatives, see: Manchot & Konig (1924); Stephenson & Wilkinson (1966); Kingston et al. (1967); Baghlaf et al. (2007); Campbell (1975); Padhey & Kaufman (1985). For a related structure, see: Bakar et al. (1993).graphic file with name e-67-0m925-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [RuCl2(C6H16N2)(CO)2]

  • M r = 344.20

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.463 (6) Å

  • b = 14.579 (6) Å

  • c = 12.718 (12) Å

  • β = 106.37 (8)°

  • V = 1327.7 (17) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.57 mm−1

  • T = 160 K

  • 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) T min = 0.591, T max = 0.69

  • 3153 measured reflections

  • 2877 independent reflections

  • 2644 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.015

  • 2 standard reflections every 100 reflections intensity decay: 5%

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.023

  • wR(F 2) = 0.061

  • S = 1.07

  • 2877 reflections

  • 184 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 1.06 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.48 e Å−3

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: DIRDIF99 (Beurskens et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022227/hb5901sup1.cif

e-67-0m925-sup1.cif (17.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022227/hb5901Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m925-Isup2.hkl (138.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Ru1—C1 1.872 (3)
Ru1—C2 1.872 (2)
Ru1—N2 2.211 (2)
Ru1—N1 2.220 (2)
Ru1—Cl1 2.413 (2)
Ru1—Cl2 2.408 (2)
N2—Ru1—N1 82.75 (9)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Chemistry Department, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for providing the research facilities.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The salt [Ru(CO)2Cl2]n was first reported by (Manchot & Konig, 1924) but its importance and chemistry was shown in late 1960's by (Stephenson & Wilkinson, 1966), (Kingston et al., 1967) who have reported several compounds of the type [Ru(CO)2Cl2L2] where L=monodentate ligand. This was due to the fact that the salt [Ru(CO)2Cl2]n has proved a useful precursor for the synthesis of a variety of organometallic compounds. We have also reported from our laboratories compounds with ligands containing N, O and S atom as electron donor (e.g. Baghlaf et al., 2007). However (Campbell (1975) and Padhey & Kaufman (1985) have reported about remarkable biological activities of such compounds against microbes, viruses and tumours. This has been the main reason for our research activity in the field of bio-inorganic chemistry of transition metal complexes. The metal atom Ru in the salt [Ru(CO)2Cl2]n being electron deficient acts as electron acceptor. This enhances its ability to coordinate with electron donor ligand (TMEDA) to give a stable octahedral electron rich compound of low ionization energy [Ru(CO)2Cl2TMEDA]. The bidentate nature of the ligand (TMEDA) has also been reported in the X-ray structure of the complex [Mo(CO)4TMEDA] by (Bakar et al., 1993).

In the crystal structure of title compound, ruthenium atom is almost octahedrally coordinated to the two nitrogen-donors atoms of tetramethyl ethylene-1,2-diamine (TMEDA), two chloro and two carbonyl groups. A five membered non-planer ring formed through Ru1/N1/C5/C6/N2 as both of the carbon atoms are sp3 hybridized. The root mean square deniavtion for the ring measure 0.2149Å with the maximum deviation from C5 and C6 measures -0.2999 (19) Å and 0.3144 (19)Å respectively.

Experimental

In a 100-ml round bottom flask fitted with nitrogen gas inlet, water condenser and magnetic stirrer was added 0.2 g of [Ru(CO)2 Cl2]n and 0.5 ml of tetramethylethylene diamine (TMEDA) in 15 ml MeOH. The reaction mixture was heated at about 70 °C for 1 h. The yellow green solution was reduced in volume and passed through a small alumina column (15 g. Al2O3). The yellow band was eluted with MeOH. The solvent was reduced in volume and on cooling it gave yellow blocks of (I). Yield 70%.

Refinement

All the C—H H-atoms were positioned via fourier map with C—H = 0.91 (3)—1.11 (3) Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueqfor aromatic C atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Unit cell packing for (I).

Crystal data

[RuCl2(C6H16N2)(CO)2] F(000) = 688
Mr = 344.20 Dx = 1.722 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Melting point: 493 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.463 (6) Å Cell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 14.579 (6) Å θ = 10.6–14.0°
c = 12.718 (12) Å µ = 1.57 mm1
β = 106.37 (8)° T = 160 K
V = 1327.7 (17) Å3 Block, yellow
Z = 4 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 2644 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.015
graphite θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Nonprofiled ω/2θ scans h = −9→9
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→18
Tmin = 0.591, Tmax = 0.69 l = 0→16
3153 measured reflections 2 standard reflections every 100 reflections
2877 independent reflections intensity decay: 5%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.061 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0385P)2 + 0.6002P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2877 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
184 parameters Δρmax = 1.06 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.48 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 −0.0497 (3) 0.14822 (15) 0.31835 (17) 0.0244 (4)
C2 0.1219 (3) −0.01145 (15) 0.39077 (17) 0.0237 (4)
C3 0.5479 (3) 0.00447 (17) 0.3248 (2) 0.0269 (4)
H3A 0.634 (4) −0.025 (2) 0.292 (2) 0.032*
H3B 0.542 (4) −0.025 (2) 0.386 (2) 0.032*
H3C 0.587 (4) 0.065 (2) 0.342 (2) 0.032*
C4 0.3204 (4) −0.09661 (19) 0.2146 (3) 0.0397 (6)
H4A 0.197 (5) −0.105 (2) 0.163 (3) 0.048*
H4B 0.331 (4) −0.131 (2) 0.294 (3) 0.048*
H4C 0.417 (5) −0.121 (2) 0.187 (3) 0.048*
C5 0.3756 (4) 0.0491 (2) 0.1397 (2) 0.0376 (6)
H5A 0.269 (5) 0.028 (2) 0.078 (3) 0.045*
H5B 0.496 (5) 0.032 (2) 0.127 (3) 0.045*
C6 0.3660 (4) 0.1513 (2) 0.1516 (2) 0.0362 (6)
H6A 0.459 (5) 0.170 (2) 0.218 (3) 0.043*
H6B 0.373 (4) 0.180 (2) 0.087 (3) 0.043*
C7 0.0379 (4) 0.17649 (19) 0.0602 (2) 0.0352 (5)
H7A −0.077 (5) 0.197 (2) 0.078 (2) 0.042*
H7B 0.026 (4) 0.115 (2) 0.023 (3) 0.042*
H7C 0.077 (4) 0.219 (2) 0.010 (3) 0.042*
C8 0.1967 (4) 0.27503 (17) 0.2056 (2) 0.0385 (6)
H8A 0.229 (5) 0.311 (2) 0.152 (3) 0.046*
H8B 0.285 (5) 0.285 (2) 0.277 (3) 0.046*
H8C 0.075 (5) 0.294 (2) 0.214 (2) 0.046*
Cl1 0.36315 (7) 0.16019 (4) 0.43227 (4) 0.02799 (12)
Cl2 −0.09471 (7) −0.00421 (4) 0.15266 (4) 0.02621 (12)
O1 −0.1658 (2) 0.19233 (12) 0.33235 (15) 0.0343 (4)
O2 0.1117 (3) −0.06675 (12) 0.45157 (15) 0.0377 (4)
Ru1 0.14044 (2) 0.078019 (10) 0.288724 (12) 0.01683 (7)
N1 0.3635 (2) 0.00254 (13) 0.24068 (15) 0.0233 (4)
N2 0.1815 (3) 0.17845 (13) 0.16732 (15) 0.0246 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0238 (10) 0.0231 (10) 0.0239 (10) −0.0067 (9) 0.0027 (8) −0.0024 (8)
C2 0.0224 (10) 0.0243 (10) 0.0224 (9) −0.0033 (8) 0.0034 (8) −0.0050 (8)
C3 0.0185 (10) 0.0303 (12) 0.0289 (11) 0.0033 (9) 0.0018 (8) 0.0029 (9)
C4 0.0287 (12) 0.0310 (13) 0.0561 (18) 0.0060 (10) 0.0064 (12) −0.0169 (12)
C5 0.0329 (13) 0.0558 (16) 0.0263 (12) 0.0170 (12) 0.0120 (10) 0.0091 (11)
C6 0.0270 (12) 0.0467 (15) 0.0368 (13) 0.0019 (11) 0.0119 (10) 0.0174 (12)
C7 0.0338 (13) 0.0380 (14) 0.0281 (12) 0.0010 (11) −0.0007 (10) 0.0110 (10)
C8 0.0492 (16) 0.0200 (11) 0.0423 (14) −0.0074 (11) 0.0065 (12) 0.0060 (10)
Cl1 0.0275 (3) 0.0288 (3) 0.0241 (2) −0.0044 (2) 0.0016 (2) −0.0063 (2)
Cl2 0.0198 (2) 0.0304 (3) 0.0266 (2) −0.00546 (19) 0.00355 (19) −0.0077 (2)
O1 0.0267 (8) 0.0290 (9) 0.0485 (10) 0.0042 (7) 0.0129 (7) −0.0069 (7)
O2 0.0473 (11) 0.0342 (9) 0.0326 (9) −0.0072 (8) 0.0129 (8) 0.0088 (8)
Ru1 0.01583 (10) 0.01612 (10) 0.01779 (10) −0.00122 (5) 0.00351 (7) −0.00079 (5)
N1 0.0207 (8) 0.0256 (9) 0.0229 (8) 0.0035 (7) 0.0049 (7) −0.0021 (7)
N2 0.0242 (9) 0.0230 (9) 0.0244 (9) −0.0019 (7) 0.0035 (7) 0.0046 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ru1—C1 1.872 (3) C5—N1 1.477 (3)
Ru1—C2 1.872 (2) C5—C6 1.502 (4)
Ru1—N2 2.211 (2) C5—H5A 1.00 (3)
Ru1—N1 2.220 (2) C5—H5B 0.99 (3)
Ru1—Cl1 2.413 (2) C6—N2 1.500 (3)
Ru1—Cl2 2.408 (2) C6—H6A 0.97 (3)
C1—O1 1.133 (3) C6—H6B 0.94 (3)
C2—O2 1.134 (3) C7—N2 1.477 (3)
C3—N1 1.486 (3) C7—H7A 1.00 (3)
C3—H3A 0.96 (3) C7—H7B 1.00 (3)
C3—H3B 0.91 (3) C7—H7C 0.99 (3)
C3—H3C 0.93 (3) C8—N2 1.484 (3)
C4—N1 1.498 (3) C8—H8A 0.94 (3)
C4—H4A 0.98 (4) C8—H8B 0.97 (3)
C4—H4B 1.11 (3) C8—H8C 0.98 (3)
C4—H4C 0.95 (4)
O1—C1—Ru1 177.3 (2) N2—C8—H8B 114.7 (19)
O2—C2—Ru1 178.8 (2) H8A—C8—H8B 110 (3)
N1—C3—H3A 106.0 (16) N2—C8—H8C 108.2 (19)
N1—C3—H3B 110.6 (18) H8A—C8—H8C 111 (3)
H3A—C3—H3B 111 (2) H8B—C8—H8C 105 (3)
N1—C3—H3C 110.5 (19) C1—Ru1—C2 91.90 (11)
H3A—C3—H3C 109 (3) C1—Ru1—N2 92.33 (10)
H3B—C3—H3C 110 (3) C2—Ru1—N2 175.71 (8)
N1—C4—H4A 111.8 (19) C1—Ru1—N1 174.94 (8)
N1—C4—H4B 106.3 (17) C2—Ru1—N1 93.04 (10)
H4A—C4—H4B 111 (3) N2—Ru1—N1 82.75 (9)
N1—C4—H4C 108 (2) C1—Ru1—Cl2 88.66 (9)
H4A—C4—H4C 112 (3) C2—Ru1—Cl2 88.29 (9)
H4B—C4—H4C 107 (3) N2—Ru1—Cl2 92.53 (8)
N1—C5—C6 110.6 (2) N1—Ru1—Cl2 90.38 (8)
N1—C5—H5A 108.2 (18) C1—Ru1—Cl1 88.62 (9)
C6—C5—H5A 109.8 (18) C2—Ru1—Cl1 89.49 (9)
N1—C5—H5B 108.0 (18) N2—Ru1—Cl1 89.89 (8)
C6—C5—H5B 110.0 (19) N1—Ru1—Cl1 92.53 (8)
H5A—C5—H5B 110 (3) Cl2—Ru1—Cl1 176.424 (19)
N2—C6—C5 110.3 (2) C5—N1—C3 110.3 (2)
N2—C6—H6A 105.4 (18) C5—N1—C4 108.2 (2)
C5—C6—H6A 108.6 (18) C3—N1—C4 105.97 (18)
N2—C6—H6B 106.0 (19) C5—N1—Ru1 104.24 (15)
C5—C6—H6B 110.2 (19) C3—N1—Ru1 113.96 (15)
H6A—C6—H6B 116 (3) C4—N1—Ru1 114.10 (15)
N2—C7—H7A 103.4 (18) C7—N2—C8 106.8 (2)
N2—C7—H7B 113.4 (18) C7—N2—C6 109.1 (2)
H7A—C7—H7B 114 (3) C8—N2—C6 107.8 (2)
N2—C7—H7C 108.3 (19) C7—N2—Ru1 115.10 (15)
H7A—C7—H7C 113 (2) C8—N2—Ru1 114.35 (16)
H7B—C7—H7C 105 (2) C6—N2—Ru1 103.38 (14)
N2—C8—H8A 107.7 (19)
N1—C5—C6—N2 −62.9 (3) C5—C6—N2—C7 −78.1 (2)
C6—C5—N1—C3 −80.0 (2) C5—C6—N2—C8 166.3 (2)
C6—C5—N1—C4 164.5 (2) C5—C6—N2—Ru1 44.8 (2)
C6—C5—N1—Ru1 42.7 (2) C1—Ru1—N2—C7 −76.26 (19)
C1—Ru1—N1—C5 −0.1 (9) C2—Ru1—N2—C7 113.4 (10)
C2—Ru1—N1—C5 167.17 (16) N1—Ru1—N2—C7 102.56 (18)
N2—Ru1—N1—C5 −13.63 (16) Cl2—Ru1—N2—C7 12.49 (17)
Cl2—Ru1—N1—C5 78.87 (17) Cl1—Ru1—N2—C7 −164.88 (17)
Cl1—Ru1—N1—C5 −103.20 (17) C1—Ru1—N2—C8 48.00 (19)
C1—Ru1—N1—C3 120.1 (9) C2—Ru1—N2—C8 −122.3 (10)
C2—Ru1—N1—C3 −72.57 (17) N1—Ru1—N2—C8 −133.18 (18)
N2—Ru1—N1—C3 106.62 (16) Cl2—Ru1—N2—C8 136.76 (17)
Cl2—Ru1—N1—C3 −160.87 (15) Cl1—Ru1—N2—C8 −40.61 (17)
Cl1—Ru1—N1—C3 17.05 (15) C1—Ru1—N2—C6 164.90 (16)
C1—Ru1—N1—C4 −117.9 (9) C2—Ru1—N2—C6 −5.4 (11)
C2—Ru1—N1—C4 49.35 (19) N1—Ru1—N2—C6 −16.28 (15)
N2—Ru1—N1—C4 −131.46 (18) Cl2—Ru1—N2—C6 −106.34 (16)
Cl2—Ru1—N1—C4 −38.96 (17) Cl1—Ru1—N2—C6 76.29 (16)
Cl1—Ru1—N1—C4 138.97 (17)

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5901).

References

  1. Baghlaf, A. O., Al-Yami, F. A. & Ishaq, M. (2007). JKAU Sci. 19, 41–46.
  2. Bakar, M. A., Fun, H.-K., Chinnakali, K., Teoh, S.-G., Shawkataly, O. B. & Lopez, F. M. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 582–584.
  3. Beurskens, P. T., Beurskens, G., de Gelder, R., Garcia-Granda, S., Gould, R. O., Israel, R. & Smits, J. M. M. (1999). The DIRDIF99 Program System Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  4. Campbell, M. J. M. (1975). Coord. Chem. Rev. 15, 279–312.
  5. Enraf–Nonius (1994). CAD-4 EXPRESS Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.
  6. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  7. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.
  8. Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
  9. Kingston, J. Y., Jamieson, T. W. S. & Wilkinson, G. (1967). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 29, 133–138.
  10. Manchot, W. & Konig, J. (1924). Chem. Ber. 57, 2130–2133.
  11. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  12. Padhey, S. & Kaufman, G. B. (1985). Coord. Chem. Rev. 63, 127–160.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Stephenson, T. A. & Wilkinson, G. (1966). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 945–956.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022227/hb5901sup1.cif

e-67-0m925-sup1.cif (17.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022227/hb5901Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m925-Isup2.hkl (138.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES