Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011 May 4;66(4):336–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01006.x

Isolation of Hofbauer Cells from Human Term Placentas with High Yield and Purity

Zhonghua Tang 1, Serkalem Tadesse 2, Errol Norwitz 2, Gil Mor 1, Vikki M Abrahams 1, Seth Guller 1
PMCID: PMC3154981  NIHMSID: NIHMS277164  PMID: 21545365

Abstract

Problem

Placental villus macrophages (i.e. Hofbauer cells, HBCs) were identified more than 100 years ago. Alterations in their numbers and characteristics are associated with several complications of pregnancy. Although HBCs have previously been isolated and cultured, there is no consensus methodology to obtain these cells with high yield and purity for in vitro studies.

Method of Study

HBCs were isolated from human term placentas using protocols in which cytotrophoblasts (CTs) and fibroblasts (FIBs), other major villous cell types, were isolated in parallel. Enzymatic digestion, Percoll gradients, and immunoselection were used to isolate the three cell types. Purity was assessed by morphology, flow cytometry, and in phagocytosis assays.

Results

HBCs were isolated with 98–99% purity and a yield of 130–200 ×106 cells/80 to 100 g of tissue. HBCs exhibited a pleiomorphic and vacuolated appearance for at least 5 days in culture medium with and without serum. High levels of phagocytosis in HBCs, but not in CTs, or FIBs, confirmed macrophage function in HBCs. Phagocytotic activity was maintained across several days in culture.

Conclusion

HBCs were isolated from term placenta with high yield and purity using protocols in which CTs and FIBs were also obtained. This methodology will foster future studies which examine the role of HBCs in regulating villus function.

Keywords: Placenta, fetal macrophages, Hofbauer cells, cell isolation and culture

INTRODUCTION

The human placental villus is composed of syncytiotrophoblast (SCT), the outer cell layer lining the intervillous space and in direct contact with maternal blood, and underlying stromal cells, which are adjacent to fetal capillaries, and consist of fibroblasts (FIBs) and Hofbauer cells (i.e. HBCs, fetal tissue macrophages).1, 2 More than 100 years ago HBCs were first described in the placental villus by several investigators, and morphological studies by Hofbauer and others revealed these large (10–30 μm) pleiomorphic cells to be highly vacuolated with a granular cytoplasm.1, 2 HBCs appear on the 18th day of gestation and are found until term.3 Villous stromal compression in mid-gestation makes their identification difficult in the third trimester prompting the use of immunohistochemistry with antibodies raised against macrophage proteins (e.g. CD68, CD163).4, 5 HBCs were demonstarted to be fetal in origin based on the use of Y chromosome-specific probes in pregnancies with a male fetus.5, 6

Phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies and cellular debris, as well antigen presentation in response to inflammation and infectious agents, are considered to be general functions of tissue macrophages.7 However, how these processes are modulated in HBCs during normal pregnancy, as well as potential disruption in pregnancy complications, remains unelucidated. Reports from several groups indicate that HBCs may play a key role in early placental development by regulating angiogenesis,8 vasculogenesis,9 and maturation of the placental mesenchyme.10 Changes in mumbers of HBC's or alterations in their characteristics are noted in complications of pregnacy including villitis of unknown etiology (VUE), a destructive inflammatory lesion of the chorionic villi which is associated with intrauterine fetal growth restriction and significant perinatal morbidity and mortality.11, 12 VUE is characterized by an influx of CD8+ maternal T lymphocytes and HBCs to the placental villus.5, 6, 13, 14 In contrast to VUE, histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) is most often caused by ascending genital tract microorganisms which stimulate the infiltration of neutrophils in maternal decidua and fetal membranes, with or without a neutrophilic response in the placenta and fetus.15 Levels of HBCs in the placental villus have been reported to increase16 and decrease17 in HCA. Based on immunohistochemical analysis, our group recently reported that there was a 2 to 3-fold focal increase in HBCs in the villus stroma of placentas from pregnancies with HCA compared to gestational age-matched controls.18

The employment of in vitro culture systems enables the analysis of HBC cell function and potentail insight into the role HBCs play in placental pathophysiology in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Indeed, several studies have described biological responses of HBCs following their isolation from term placenta.1925 Early methodologies used digestion and homogenization to disrupt villous tissue, and then Percoll and Ficoll gradients to separate cell types based on their densities.21, 24, 26 Strong adherence of HBCs to tissue culture plastic compared to other cell types was also utilized in purification strategies.8, 24, 27 Later approaches removed contaminating cytotrophoblasts (CTs) through negative immunoselection techniques with antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor and magnetic beads.22, 25 However, unlike methodologies used to isolate CTs which have remained largely unchanged for more than 20 years,23, 2831 there appears to be no consensus regarding a specific methodology which can be used to consistently isolate HBCs in high yield and purity, indicating that no standard technique is currently available. Thus, the goal of the current study was to develop a protocol for the isolation of HBCs in high yield and purity which could foster more mechanistic studies of HBC function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of Placentas

Placentas (n=8) from uncomplicated term pregnancies were brought to the laboratory within 30 min following elective cesarean section without labor at New Haven Hospital. Infection was excluded on the basis of standard clinical criteria (absence of fever, uterine tenderness, maternal/fetal tachycardia, foul vaginal discharge) Tissues were then processed immediately for isolation of placental cell cultures. Each placenta was processed separately (i.e. tissues were not pooled). Approval for this study was granted by the Yale University School of Medicine Human Investigation Committee.

Isolation of cytotrophoblasts (CTs), Hofbauer cells (HBCs) and fibroblasts (FIBs)

Isolation of the three cell types was initiated through protocols previously employed to obtain CTs using Trypsin/DNase I digestion and discontinuous Percoll gradient fractionation, employing slight modifications of published methodologies.23, 28, 31, 32 Villous tissue was dissected free of membranes, minced, and rinsed with calcium- and magnesium-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (see Table 1 for the sources of reagents used for cell isolation). Membrane-free villous tissue fragments were then subjected to sequential enzymatic digestions in a solution containing 0.25% trypsin, 0.2% DNase I, 25 mM HEPES, 2 mM CaCl2, and 0.8 mM MgSO4 in Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) at 37°C. Undigested tissue was removed by passage through gauze and a 100 μm sieve. The first digestion was carried out for 15 min in 150 ml of digestion solution, the supernatant was discarded, and the tissue was washed 3 times using PBS. The following digestions were carried out for 30 min in 150 ml and 200 ml of digestion solution, respectively. Cell pellets from the second and third digestions were resuspended using 1:1 mixture of DMEM/F12 with 10%FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (i.e. DF medium). Trypsin and DNase-treated tissue was saved for isolation of HBCs (see below). The resuspended cell pellets were separated on a discontinuous gradient of Percoll (50%/45%/35%/30%) by centrifugation using a Beckman TJ-25 centrifuge and a TS-5.1–500 swinging bucket rotor (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA) for 20 min at room temperature without brake at 1000 × g. Cells migrating to the 35%/45% Percoll interface were recovered by centrifugation at 300 × g for 10 min at room temperature, and were immunopurified by negative selection by simultaneous treatment with mouse anti-human CD9, mouse anti-human CD45 antibody, and then goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated DynaBeads (see Figure 1 for a description of the isolation protocol and Table 2 for antibodies used in cell isolations and flow cytometry). CD9 and CD45 antibodies were added at a ratio of 1 μg antibody per 10×106 cells, and incubations were carried out for 15 min at 4°C on a BD Clay ADAMS® nutator (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Cells were then incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated DynaBeads, at ratio of 50 μl beads per 107 cells, for 30 min at 4°C with rotation. Cells were then pelleted and washed using DF medium to remove excess unbounded antibodies. Dynabeads with attached contaminating cell types were removed by exposure to a magnet for 5 min, and were saved for culture of FIBs (see below). Cells from the supernatant were pelleted and purity of CTs was assessed by methodologies described below.

Table 1.

Reagents used for isolation of HBCs, CTS, and FIBs.

Reagents Source Cat#
Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, 1×) Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA 14190-144
2.5% Tryspin (10×) Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA 15090-046
Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, 10×) Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA 14185-052
Dynabeads® Goat anti-Mouse IgG Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA 110.33
DNase I (from bovine pancreas, grade II) Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA 10104159001
Collagenase A (from Clostridium histolyticum) Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA 11088793001
Percoll GE Healthcare Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA 17-0891-01
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F-12) Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA D2906
RPMI-1640 Medium Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA R8755
Calcium Chloride dehydrate (CaCl2) Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA C7902
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA M2643
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA S5761
HEPES Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA H4034
Lidocaine-HCl Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA L5647
BenchMark™ Fetal Bovine Serum (heat inactivated) Gemini Bio-products, West Sacramento, CA, USA 100–106
ITS+ Universal Culture Supplement Premix BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA 354352

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the protocol used to isolate CTs, FIBs, and HBCs.

CTs were generated following enzymatic digestion of placenta with trypsin, centrifugation on Percoll gradients, and negative immunoselection by simultaneous incubation with anti-CD45 and anti-CD9 antibodies. HBCs were isolated using collagenase digestion of trypsin-treated tissue, followed by centrifugation on Percoll gradients, and negative immunoselection by sequential incubation with EGFR and then CD10 antibodies. FIBs were obtained from the cells removed during negative immunoselection.

Table 2.

Antibodies used in cell isolation and flow cytometry

Antibody Clone Isotype Application Source
Unconjugated Primary Antibody
 CD9 209306 Mouse IgG2b IP R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA
 CD10 MEM-78 Mouse IgG1 IP Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA
 CD45 F10-89-4 Mouse IgG2a IP GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA
 Cytokeratin 7 OV-TL 12/30 Mouse IgG1 FCM Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA
 EGF-R 528 Mouse IgG2a IP Santa Cruz biotechnology, inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA
 Vimentin V9 Mouse IgG1 FCM Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA
Conjugated Primary Antibody
 CD45-FITC HI30 Mouse IgG1 FCM Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA
 CD68-FITC 298807 Mouse IgG2b FCM R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA
 CD90-APC Thy-1 Mouse IgG1 FCM BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
 CD163-APC GHI/61 Mouse IgG1 FCM Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA
Unconjugated Isotype Control
 Mouse IgG1 11711 FCM R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Conjugated Isotype Control
 Mouse IgG1-FITC 11711 FCM R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA
 Mouse IgG1-APC MOPC-21 FCM BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
 Mouse IgG2b-FITC MPC-11 FCM Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA
Conjugated Secondary Antibody
 Goat anti-Mouse IgG/IgM-FITC FCM BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA

HBCs were isolated from trypsin-treated tissue fragments (see above and Figure 1) which were washed using PBS and further digested with collagenase A (1mg/ml)/DNase I (0.2 mg/ml) in RPMI-1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, 5% FBS, and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (RPMI medium) for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in RPMI medium and were loaded onto a discontinuous Percoll gradient (40%/20%) and centrifuged for 20 min in a swinging bucket rotor without brake. Cells from the 40%/20% Percoll interface were pelleted and resuspended in RPMI medium. The cells were then loaded onto a second discontinuous Percoll gradient (35%/30%/25%/20%) and centrifuged for 30 min. Cells from 20%/25% to 30%/35% interfaces were combined and were immunopurified by negative selection using sequential treatment with anti-EGFR and then anti-CD10 antibodies conjugated to magnetic beads. The beads were prepared by incubating 1 μg of mouse anti-human EGFR25 or mouse anti-human CD10antibody with 50 μl goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated DynaBeads for 1 h at room temperature (Table 2). Beads were then exposed to a magnet and washed 3 times using PBS containing 0.1%BSA and 2 mM EDTA to remove unbound antibody, and were resuspended in this same solution and stored at 4°C. For HBC cell isolation, Percoll gradient purified cells were incubated on ice with anti-EGFR antibody-conjugated magnetic beads for 15 min followed by anti-CD10 conjugated magnetic beads for 15 min. Cells from the supernatant were counted using a hemocytometer, then plated in RPMI medium, and floating and weakly attached cells washed off after 1 h and then DF medium or serum-free medium (DMEM/F12 with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and ITS+ Premix, an universal culture supplement which yields a final concentration of insulin of 6.25 mg/ml; transferrin, 6.25 mg/ml; selenous acid, 6.25 ng/ml; bovine serum albumin, 1.25 mg/ml; and linoleic acid, 5.35 μg/ml) was added. HBCs were maintained for the indicated period of time prior to analysis by flow cytometry and in phagocytosis assays. Cells were plated at a density of 1.2×106 cells per well of a 12-well plate for morphological analysis and phagocytosis assays, and at 7×106 cells per T-25 flask for flow cytometric analysis.

Cultures of FIBs were obtained from cells attached cells to magnetic beads containing CD9 and CD45 antibodies from CT isolations, and those attached to anti-CD10 beads from HBC preparations (Figure 1). The bead-cell mixtures were washed and cultured in DF medium and fresh medium was added every 2–3 days until confluency was reached after approximately 2 to 3 weeks. Following trypsinization of first passage cells, magnetic beads with attached cells, comprising approximately 10% of the cell population, were removed with a magnet. Passage three FIBs were used in flow cytometric and phagocytosis assays.

Flow cytometry

CTs were fixed on day 0 (i.e. prior to plating) by incubation with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 10 min at room temperature and were stored in PBS at 4°C. For HBCs, cells were detached from the substratum using 5 mM EDTA and 4 mg/ml lidocaine-HCl in HBSS3335 and fixed and stored as above after 1 h, 1 day and 2 days of culture. FIBs were analyzed following trypsinization of passage 3 cultures. To detect surface antigen, 2×105 paraformaldehyde fixed cells were washed once using staining buffer (0.5%BSA/PBS). For analysis of intracellular and surface antigen (i.e. total) expression, staining buffer containing 1% saponin was used to permeabilize cells. Blocking of Fcγ receptor was then carried out by incubating fixed cells with human IgG (100 μg/ml) in staining buffer for 15 min at room temperature. Appropriate primary antibodies and isotype-matched controls were then added (Table 2), and incubated for 45 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice with staining buffer. For conjugated antibodies, cells were then resuspended in 300 μl of PBS for analysis. For unconjugated antibodies, cells were resuspended in staining buffer and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescent probes for another 45 min at 4°C. Cells then were washed and resuspended in 300 μl of PBS for analysis. Ten thousand events were collected using FACSCalibur and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). The results were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). The following placental cell specificities have been attributed to the chosen antibodies: CTs- EGFR,36 CD10,37 cytokeratin 7;38 HBCs- CD68, CD163-B;39, 40 FIBs- CD10,41 vimentin,39, 42 CD90;43 and leukocyte marker-CD45.40, 44 Note, cells were not permeabilized to examine expression of EGFR, CD10, CD90, CD45, and CD163 (Figures 2 Figure 3); permeabilized cells were used to examine expression of cytokeratin 7; CD68, CD163, and vimentin. The percentage of positive cells was based on comparison with the isotype-matched control antibody, for which gating was set at 1%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Purity of CTs, FIBs, and HBCs as assessed by flow cytometry.

The three cell types were incubated with antibodies shown at the left of the figure and flow cytometric analysis of cellular fluorescence is shown by the solid line in each Panel. Right-shifting of the histogram relative to the signal obtained with isotype-matched control antibody, denoted by the dashed line, is indicative of specific expression. The number of positive events and the fluorescence intensity are indicated on the y- and x-axes, respectively. The results are representative of 4 independent experiments for CTs and FIBs and 8 independent experiments for HBCs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphology of HBCs in culture.

HBCs were maintained in the presence of culture medium with serum for 1 (Panel A), 3 (Panel B), or 5(Panel C) days; or without serum for 1(Panel D), 3 (Panel E) or 5 (Panel F) days. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde prior to taking photomicrographs. Note that pleiomorphic, vacuolated, HBCs formed colonies when cultured in the presence of serum but not in its absence. A representative experiment of 3 identically conducted ones is shown. Bar, 10 μm.

Representative flow cytometry results are shown from the following number of independent experiments from different placentas for each of the three cell types: HBCs (n=8); CTs (n=4); FIBs (n=4).

Phagocytosis assay

Ten μl containing 3.6 × 108 of 1 μm yellow-green fluorescent carboxylate microspheres (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were resuspended in 1 ml of DF medium or serum-free culture medium pre-warmed to 37°C. Cells then were then incubated with the suspension of microspheres for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed at least four times with PBS (i.e. until microscopy revealed that nearly all of the non phagocytosed microspheres were removed). Cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde and stored in PBS at 4°C. Photographs were captured using a 40× objective with an Olympus IX71 fluorescent microscope. A representative experiment from 3 independently conducted ones from 3 different placentas is shown for each cell type.

RESULTS

Isolation of HBCs from human term placentas

To analyze cell purity, flow cytometric analysis with several cell-type-specific markers was carried out for HBCs maintained for 1 h in culture and compared to results obtained for CTs and FIBs. It is important to note that flow cytometry was carried out for HBC cultures detached after 1 h of culture, for uncultured CTs, and from third passage FIBs. As expected, HBCs, but not CTs or FIBs, expressed the leukocyte marker CD45 (Figure 2). This is indicated by the solid line histogram obtained in the presence of anti-CD45 antibody which is right-shifted in relation to signals obtained with an isotype-matched control antibody denoted by the dashed line. Of note, significant CD68 expression was observed for all three cell types, indicating that CD68 was not a specific marker for HBCs as determined by flow cytometry. This supports observations made by others showing expression of CD68 in non-myeloid cell types.45 Conversely, the macrophage marker CD163 was not expressed by CTs and FIBs, but nearly 100% of HBCs expressed this protein. CD90, a protein expressed by FIBs, stem cells, and other non-macrophage cell types43, 46, was strongly detected in FIBs, not it CTs, and very low levels of expression were noted in HBCs. As expected, the cytotrophoblast/epithelial cell marker cytokeratin 7 was only expressed by CTs, and the fibroblast/mesenchymal cell marker vimentin was only expressed in FIBs. The yield and purity of HBCs, using CD163 as a macrophage marker, were analyzed in 8 independent experiments and are summarized in Table 3. From 80 to 100 g of villous tissue we obtained a final yield of HBCs which ranged from 130 to 200×106 cells per preparation with cell purity of 98 or 99%. These results indicate that these protocols can be used to consistently isolate HBCs from term placenta with excellent purity and high yield.

Table 3.

Yield and purity of HBC cultures.

Experiment Villous Tissue (g) Yield (×106 cells) % CD163-positive cells
Surface Total
I 100 130 98 99
II 80 200 50 98
III 95 100 50 98
IV 80 180 97 99
V 85 140 71 98
VI 80 200 74 99
VII 80 190 40 98
VIII 80 160 84 99

Eight different placentas were used to isolate HBCs. Cells were cultured for 1 h and purity of non-permeabilized (surface expression examined) and permeabilized (total; surface+intracellular expression examined) cells was assessed by flow cytometry using anti-CD163 and isotype-matched control antibodies (see Table 2). Results are expressed as a percentage of CD-163-positive cells.

Culture of HBCs from human term placentas

Morphological characteristics of HBCs were evaluated after maintenance in DF medium, which contains 10% FBS, or in serum-free medium for up to 5 days (Figure 3). We noted that cells maintained in serum were approximately 10–20 μm in size, and manifested a pleiomorphic phenotype with vacuoles on day 1 (Figure 3A). The shape varied from round to partially elongate. These characteristics are similar to those described for HBCs in the placental villus.1 On days 3 and 5 (Figure 3B to 3C) cells increasingly formed colonies, a characteristic previously noted for macrophages isolated from mouse placenta.47 Under serum-free conditions (Figure 3D to 3F), the pleiomorphic appearance was also observed, but the vacuoles were more pronounced on days 3 and 5, and HBCs failed to form colonies. Cells maintained these described morphologies for at least one week in culture (not shown). Flow cytometry was used to assess the patterns of protein expression during the first 48 h of culture, difficulty in releasing cells from the substratum after >48 h of culture precluded flow cytometric analysis at longer culture periods. We observed that nearly 100% of permeabilized cells expressed CD163 at 1 h, 24 h and 48 h of culture (denoted by “Total” Panels in Figure 4), confirming that the macrophage phenotype is maintained in culture. It is of note that the percentage of non-permeabilized HBCs expressing CD163 increased with time in culture from 25–50% at 1 h, to 55 to 80% at 24 h and to 93–99% at 48 h (denoted by “Surface” Panels in Figure 4). This suggests that treatment of placental tissue with trypsin and or collagenase during isolation reduces surface expression of CD163 in HBCs, but cell surface levels CD163 are re-established during 1 to 2 days of culture. CD90, a marker of FIBs, was expressed in 10–50% of HBCs after 1 h of culture, with no expression being noted at 24 and 48 h (Left Panels). Interestingly, expression of vimentin (Right Panels), the fibroblast/mesenchymal cell marker, markedly increased in HBC cultures from approximately 10–20% expression at 1 h to 99% at 48 h. Others have noted that HBCs and other tissue macrophages express vimentin.39, 42, 48

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Analysis of protein expression in HBC cultures by flow cytometry.

Expression of CD163 (macrophage marker) CD90 (fibroblast marker), and vimentin (fibroblast/mesenchymal cell marker) was analyzed by flow cytometry in HBCs maintained in DF culture medium for 1, 24, and 48 h. Specific staining was indicated by the right shift of the solid line histogram obtained with antibodies to the indicated protein compared to signals obtained with isotype-matched control antibody indicated by the dashed line. Nearly 100% of permeabilized HBCs expressed CD163 at all time points tested (denoted “Total”), whereas the percentage of HBCs expressing CD163 only on their cell surface showed a time-dependent increase (denoted “Surface”). HBCs did not express CD90, and a time-dependent increase in vimentin was noted. A representative experiment of 3 identically conducted ones is shown.

Assessment of phagocytosis by HBCs, CTs, and FIBs

Levels of phagocytosis in cultures of HBCs, FIBs, and CTs were determined following a 1 h incubation with fluorescent microspheres in DF medium or serum-free medium. Phagocytosis, as indicated by the intracellular appearance of fluorescent particles, was observed in nearly all HBCs maintained in DF medium (Figure 5A to 5C) or serum-free medium (Figure. 5D to 5F) for 1, 3, or 5 days of culture prior to assay. Highest levels of phagocytosis resulting in large bright intracellular signals was noted in HBCs maintained for 5 days in serum-free medium (Figure 5F). Conversely, neither FIBs (Figure 5G) nor CTs (Figure 5H) maintained in culture for 1 day prior to assay showed evidence of phagocytosis. Thus, morphological assessment, flow cytometric analysis, and phagocytosis assays support the conclusion that the described protocols isolated functional HBCs with high yield and purity.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Assessment of phagocytosis in cultures of HBCs, FIBs, and CTs.

Cells were maintained for 1 h in the presence of DF medium containing yellow-green fluorescent carboxylate microspheres. Cells were then washed and fixed in paraformaldehyde. Phagocytosis is indicated by the appearance of bright intracellular signals. Photomicrographs indicate prominent phagocytosis in HBCs maintained in DF medium for 1 (Panel A), 3 (Panel B), and 5 (Panel C) days as well as HBCs maintained for 1 (Panel D), 3 (Panel E), and 5 days (Panel F) in serum-free medium. Conversely, phagocytosis was not detected in FIBs (Panel G) and CTs (Panel H). Bar, 10 μm.

DISCUSSION

HBCs were identified in the placental villus more than 100 years ago. Over the last several decades a wide range of techniques have been employed to isolate these fetal villous macrophage with the goal of examining their function in culture. Early methods for the isolation of HBCs from term placentas used digestion and homogenization of tissue, and then Percoll and Ficoll gradients to separate cell types base on density.21, 24, 26 Embedding of antibodies raised against HBC proteins in the membranes of erythrocytes by Rosetting was also used facilitate purification of HBCs.49, 50 Rosetting, as well as positive selection using anti-CD68 antibody20, has a potential disadvantge in that HBCs may become activated during the isolation process, perhaps complicating isolation and subsequent in vitro studies. For this reason, researchers later employed negative immunoselection techniques using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and magnetic beads to remove contaminating CTs.22, 25 To date, there appears to be no consensus regarding a specific methodology which could be consistently used to isolate HBCs in high yield and purity. Contributing factors precluding its development may include the loss of macrophage-specific markers during the digestion process which may complicate verification of purity, activation during isolation (see above), and long term culture may be compromised by outgrowth of fibroblasts. Despite the absence of uniform protocols for isolation and culture of HBCs, there have been several in vitro studies which have provided insight into potential HBC function. Early studies examined phagocytosis24, 26 and expression of the receptor for IgG-Fc and class I and class II MHC antigens.21, 24, 49 Absence of lymphocyte priming by HBCs suggested they serve an anti-inflammatory role in the villus.49 Additional studies indicate that HBCs may regulate uptake of triglycerides and transfer of fatty acids to the fetus,19 as well as stimulating the proliferation20 and differentiation8 of trophoblasts. Another study showed that hypoxic conditions decreased levels of prostaglandin E2 in HBCs,25 of specific relevance to preeclampsia, a condition associated with placental hypoxia.51, 52

Modifications to the isolation protocols made in the current study have resulted in a standardized procedure which yielded 130 to 200 ×106 HBCs per placenta in 8 independent experiments. Several notable features of our protocol include the use of 80 to 100 g of villous tissue, higher than what was previously been reported.1925 Sequential digestion with trypsin, and then collagenase served two purposes: cells released by trypsin digestion were used to obtain CTs, and the remaining tissue now had reduced levels of CTs which facilatated concomitant isolation of HBCs following collagenase treatment. Two sets of Percoll gradients were then used to better separate cells accordign to density. The negative immunoselection procedure employed a sequential treatment of cells wit anti-EGFR antibodies and then anti-CD10 Abs. Since CTs still represented the major “contaminant” of cells released during collagenase digestion, we reasoned that an initial treatment with anti-EGFR Ab would remove the majority of CTs. Subsequent treatment with anti-CD10 antibody would then be expected to remove remaining CTs as well as FIBs based on the observation that this protein is expressed by both of these cell types.37, 41 Finally, these procedures were also used to the isolate FIBs, following their detachment from magnetic bead/anti-EGFR and anti-CD10 antibody complexes and subsequent passage in culture. Thus CTs, FIBs, and HBCs, three major cell types of the placental villous, were isolated during these procedures.

Another novelty of this study is that purity of HBCs, as well as that of CTs and FIBs, was assessed by flow cytometry. Our results indicated, that following removal of unattached and weakly adherent cells 1 h after plating, HBCs were obtained with purities of 98 to 99% based on expression of the macrophage marker CD163. HBCs also expressed the pan-macrophage marker CD68, the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 as well, but did not express cytokeratin 7 (epithelial/CT marker), and weakly expressed both the mesenchymal protein marker vimentin as well as the fibroblast/stem cell marker CD90. Of note, CD68 was also expressed by CTs and FIBs, indicating that it was not a specific marker of macrophages as assessed by flow cytometry. Similar observations of CD68 expression in non-myeloid cell types were made by other groups using anti-CD68 antibodies different than the one employed in the current study.45, 53 Use of the “macrophage-specific” KP1 antibody revealed significant cross-reactivity with FIBs and endothelial cells by flow cytometry,45 and with CTs, syncytiotrophoblast, and FIBs by immunohistochemistry.39 This lead authors to conclude that CD68 is not a selective marker of macrophages45 and anti-CD163 antibody is the most appropriate for identifying HBCs.39

Several noteworthy observations were made during culture of HBCs. Flow cytometry of of HBCs permebilized after 1 h of culture revealed that 98–99% of the cells expressed CD163. However, in non-permebilized cells, in which only surface levels of proteins are detected, levels of CD163 ranged from 25 to 50% at 1 h of culture to 93 to 99% at 48 h of culture. This suggested that levels of CD163 on the surface of HBCs, reduced by trypsin and/or collagenase treatment during cell isolation, were enhnaced during subsequent culture. This supports previous findings that enzymatic treatments used during cell isolation procedures may reduce proteins associated with the cell surface,54 which may complicate determinations of cell purity. It is also of note that expression of vimentin, an intermediate filament protein clasically found in fibroblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells,39, 42 increased in expression in HBCs from a value of 10–20% expression at 1 h to 99% at 48 h. Other investigators have observed that tissue macrophages express cell-associated vimentin, and secrete it as well.39, 42, 48 Since levels of CD90, a marker of FIBs, decreased with time in culture from 10–50% expression at 1 h to <1% at 24 and 48 h, this indicated that the time-dependent increases in vimentin expression in HBC cultures was not due to proliferation of a fibroblast contaminant. This suggests that HBCs may undergo transitions in mesenchymal phenotypes during the culture period. Flow cytometric measurements of cultured cells HBCs were made in cells maintained in medium supplemented with serum. Morphological assessment of HBCs under these conditions revealed a predominance of round, vacuolated cells at 1 h of culture. Following culture for 1 to 5 days, vacuoles were maintained but more elongated cells were noted, and prominent cell colonies formed. Colony formation during culture was previously noted for murine placental macrophages.47 Elongation of cells was also noted in serum free-medium, however more prominent vacuoles were present compared to those observed in the presence of serum, and HBCs failed to form colonies. This indicated that cell migration and colony formation required growth factors not present in serum-free medium.

High levels of phagocytosis by HBCs, as assessed by uptake of fluorescent carboxylate microspheres, were noted in the presence and absence of serum factors. Equivalent or elevated levels of phagocytosis were noted in Day 5 cultures compared to that observed on Day 1. Under the conditions studied, no evidence of phagocytosis was noted in cultures of CTs and FIBs, indicative of cell-specific phagocytosis by HBCs. These results indicate that viability and function of isolated HBCs are maintained in culture for at least 5 days in the presence and absence of serum.

In conclusion, HBCs were isolated from term placenta with high yield and purity using procedures in which CTs and FIBs were concomitantly obtained. Biochemical and functional assessment of cultured HBCs revealed that macrophage phenotype and function were maintained during extended culture in the presence and absence of serum. These results should facilitate examination of the molecular regulation of HBC function in future studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Luisa Coraluzzi and Erin Kustan for their procurement of placentas for in vitro studies. This work was supported in part by ARRA R01 grant HD33909-13 (SG) and P01 Grant HD054713-01 (GM) from the NIH.

Abbreviations

CTs

cytotrophoblasts

FCM

flow cytometry

FIBs

fibroblasts

HBC

Hofbauer cell

IP

immunopurification

REFERENCES

  • 1.Castellucci MK, P . Pathology of the Human Placenta. 4th edn. Springer-Verlag; New York: 2000. Basic Structure of Villous Trees. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Georgiades P, Ferguson-Smith AC, Burton GJ. Comparative developmental anatomy of the murine and human definitive placentae. Placenta. 2002;23:3–19. doi: 10.1053/plac.2001.0738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Castellucci M, Zaccheo D, Pescetto G. A three-dimensional study of the normal human placental villous core. I. The Hofbauer cells. Cell Tissue Res. 1980;210:235–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00237612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fox H. The incidence and significance of Hofbauer cells in the mature human placenta. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967;93:710–717. doi: 10.1002/path.1700930239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim JS, Romero R, Kim MR, Kim YM, Friel L, Espinoza J, Kim CJ. Involvement of Hofbauer cells and maternal T cells in villitis of unknown aetiology. Histopathology. 2008;52:457–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.02964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim MJ, Romero R, Kim CJ, Tarca AL, Chhauy S, LaJeunesse C, Lee DC, Draghici S, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Hassan SS, Kim JS. Villitis of unknown etiology is associated with a distinct pattern of chemokine up-regulation in the feto-maternal and placental compartments: implications for conjoint maternal allograft rejection and maternal anti-fetal graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. 2009;182:3919–3927. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wynn TA, Barron L. Macrophages: master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 30:245–257. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khan S, Katabuchi H, Araki M, Nishimura R, Okamura H. Human villous macrophage-conditioned media enhance human trophoblast growth and differentiation in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2000;62:1075–1083. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod62.4.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seval Y, Korgun ET, Demir R. Hofbauer cells in early human placenta: possible implications in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Placenta. 2007;28:841–845. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ingman K, Cookson VJ, Jones CJ, Aplin JD. Characterisation of Hofbauer cells in first and second trimester placenta: incidence, phenotype, survival in vitro and motility. Placenta. 31:535–544. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Becroft DM, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA. Placental villitis of unknown origin: epidemiologic associations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Robillard PY, Dekker G, Chaouat G, Hulsey TC. Etiology of preeclampsia: maternal vascular predisposition and couple disease--mutual exclusion or complementarity? J Reprod Immunol. 2007;76:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Myerson D, Parkin RK, Benirschke K, Tschetter CN, Hyde SR. The pathogenesis of villitis of unknown etiology: analysis with a new conjoint immunohistochemistry-in situ hybridization procedure to identify specific maternal and fetal cells. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2006;9:257–265. doi: 10.2350/08-05-0103.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Redline RW, Patterson P. Villitis of unknown etiology is associated with major infiltration of fetal tissue by maternal inflammatory cells. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:473–479. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Redline RW. Placental inflammation. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9:265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hung TH, Chen SF, Hsu JJ, Hsieh CC, Hsueh S, Hsieh TT. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme in human gestational tissues from pregnancies complicated by chorioamnionitis. Placenta. 2006;27:996–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vinnars MT, Rindsjo E, Ghazi S, Sundberg A, Papadogiannakis N. The Number of CD68+ (Hofbauer) Cells is Decreased in Placentas with Chorioamnionitis and with Advancing Gestational Age. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2009:1. doi: 10.2350/09-03-0632-OA.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Toti P, Arcuri F, Tang Z, Schatz F, Zambrano E, Mor GT, Niven-Fairchild T, Abrahams V, Krikun G, Lockwood C, Guller S. Focal Increases of Fetal Macrophages in Placentas from Pregnancies with Histological Chorioamnionitis (HCA): Potential Role of Fibroblast Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1) American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00927.x. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bonet B, Brunzell JD, Gown AM, Knopp RH. Metabolism of very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride by human placental cells: the role of lipoprotein lipase. Metabolism. 1992;41:596–603. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90051-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cervar M, Blaschitz A, Dohr G, Desoye G. Paracrine regulation of distinct trophoblast functions in vitro by placental macrophages. Cell Tissue Res. 1999;295:297–305. doi: 10.1007/s004410051236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hunt JS, King CR, Jr., Wood GW. Evaluation of human chorionic trophoblast cells and placental macrophages as stimulators of maternal lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. J Reprod Immunol. 1984;6:377–391. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(84)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McIntire RH, Petroff MG, Phillips TA, Hunt JS. In vitro models for studying human uterine and placental macrophages. Methods Mol Med. 2006;122:123–148. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-989-3:123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Petroff MG, Phillips TA, Ka H, Pace JL, Hunt JS. Isolation and culture of term human trophoblast cells. Methods Mol Med. 2006;121:203–217. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-983-4:201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uren S, Boyle W. Isolation of macrophages from human placenta. J Immunol Methods. 1985;78:25–34. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(85)90326-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wetzka B, Clark DE, Charnock-Jones DS, Zahradnik HP, Smith SK. Isolation of macrophages (Hofbauer cells) from human term placenta and their prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane production. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:847–852. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilson CB, Haas JE, Weaver WM. Isolation, purification and characteristics of mononuclear phagocytes from human placentas. J Immunol Methods. 1983;56:305–317. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(83)80020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pavlov OV, Sel'kov SA, Seliutin AV, Shamugiia MS. Production of cultured human placental macrophages. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1998;125:579–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Douglas GC, King BF. Isolation of pure villous cytotrophoblast from term human placenta using immunomagnetic microspheres. J Immunol Methods. 1989;119:259–268. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guller S, Buhimschi CS, Ma YY, Huang ST, Yang L, Kuczynski E, Zambrano E, Lockwood CJ, Buhimschi IA. Placental expression of ceruloplasmin in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Lab Invest. 2008;88:1057–1067. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guller S, Wozniak R, Krikun G, Burnham JM, Kaplan P, Lockwood CJ. Glucocorticoid suppression of human placental fibronectin expression: implications in uterine-placental adherence. Endocrinology. 1993;133:1139–1146. doi: 10.1210/endo.133.3.8365358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kliman HJ, Nestler JE, Sermasi E, Sanger JM, Strauss JF., 3rd Purification, characterization, and in vitro differentiation of cytotrophoblasts from human term placentae. Endocrinology. 1986;118:1567–1582. doi: 10.1210/endo-118-4-1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guller S, LaCroix NC, Kirkun G, Wozniak R, Markiewicz L, Wang EY, Kaplan P, Lockwood CJ. Steroid regulation of oncofetal fibronectin expression in human cytotrophoblasts. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;46:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(93)90202-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Davies JQ, Gordon S. Isolation and culture of murine macrophages. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;290:91–103. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-838-2:091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davies JQ, Gordon S. Isolation and culture of human macrophages. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;290:105–116. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-838-2:105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Varin A, Mukhopadhyay S, Herbein G, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages by IL-4 impairs phagocytosis of pathogens but potentiates microbial-induced signalling and cytokine secretion. Blood. 115:353–362. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-236711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Muhlhauser J, Crescimanno C, Kaufmann P, Hofler H, Zaccheo D, Castellucci M. Differentiation and proliferation patterns in human trophoblast revealed by c-erbB-2 oncogene product and EGF-R. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41:165–173. doi: 10.1177/41.2.8093455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ordi J, Romagosa C, Tavassoli FA, Nogales F, Palacin A, Condom E, Torne A, Cardesa A. CD10 expression in epithelial tissues and tumors of the gynecologic tract: a useful marker in the diagnosis of mesonephric, trophoblastic, and clear cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:178–186. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200302000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maldonado-Estrada J, Menu E, Roques P, Barre-Sinoussi F, Chaouat G. Evaluation of Cytokeratin 7 as an accurate intracellular marker with which to assess the purity of human placental villous trophoblast cells by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2004;286:21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2003.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blaschitz A, Weiss U, Dohr G, Desoye G. Antibody reaction patterns in first trimester placenta: implications for trophoblast isolation and purity screening. Placenta. 2000;21:733–741. doi: 10.1053/plac.2000.0559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bockle BC, Solder E, Kind S, Romani N, Sepp NT. DC-sign+ CD163+ macrophages expressing hyaluronan receptor LYVE-1 are located within chorion villi of the placenta. Placenta. 2008;29:187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mariotti E, Mirabelli P, Abate G, Schiattarella M, Martinelli P, Fortunato G, Di Noto R, Del Vecchio L. Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and placenta: CD10, CD49d, and CD56 make a difference. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;17:1039–1041. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Contractor SF, Routledge A, Sooranna SR. Identification and estimation of cell types in mixed primary cell cultures of early and term human placenta. Placenta. 1984;5:41–53. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(84)80047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rege TA, Hagood JS. Thy-1 as a regulator of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in axon regeneration, apoptosis, adhesion, migration, cancer, and fibrosis. Faseb J. 2006;20:1045–1054. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5460rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lairmore MD, Cuthbert PS, Utley LL, Morgan CJ, Dezzutti CS, Anderson CL, Sedmak DD. Cellular localization of CD4 in the human placenta. Implications for maternal-to-fetal transmission of HIV. J Immunol. 1993;151:1673–1681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gottfried E, Kunz-Schughart LA, Weber A, Rehli M, Peuker A, Muller A, Kastenberger M, Brockhoff G, Andreesen R, Kreutz M. Expression of CD68 in non-myeloid cell types. Scand J Immunol. 2008;67:453–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haack-Sorensen M, Friis T, Bindslev L, Mortensen S, Johnsen HE, Kastrup J. Comparison of different culture conditions for human mesenchymal stromal cells for clinical stem cell therapy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68:192–203. doi: 10.1080/00365510701601681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Takahashi K, Naito M, Katabuchi H, Higashi K. Development, differentiation, and maturation of macrophages in the chorionic villi of mouse placenta with special reference to the origin of Hofbauer cells. J Leukoc Biol. 1991;50:57–68. doi: 10.1002/jlb.50.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mor-Vaknin N, Punturieri A, Sitwala K, Markovitz DM. Vimentin is secreted by activated macrophages. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:59–63. doi: 10.1038/ncb898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sutton LN, Mason DY, Redman CW. Isolation and characterization of human fetal macrophages from placenta. Clin Exp Immunol. 1989;78:437–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zaccheo D, Pistoia V, Castellucci M, Martinoli C. Isolation and characterization of Hofbauer cells from human placental villi. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1989;246:189–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00934518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005;308:1592–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.1111726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharma S, Norris WE, Kalkunte S. Beyond the threshold: an etiological bridge between hypoxia and immunity in preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 85:112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.La Rocca G, Anzalone R, Farina F. The expression of CD68 in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: new evidences of presence in non-myeloid cell types. Scand J Immunol. 2009;70:161–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Grabner R, Till U, Heller R. Flow cytometric determination of E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 in formaldehyde-fixed endothelial cell monolayers. Cytometry. 2000;40:238–244. doi: 10.1002/1097-0320(20000701)40:3<238::aid-cyto9>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES