Skip to main content
Applied Physics Letters logoLink to Applied Physics Letters
. 2011 Jul 20;99(3):032901–032901-3. doi: 10.1063/1.3615684

Complete set of material properties of single domain 0.24Pb(In1∕2Nb1∕2)O3-0.49Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-0.27PbTiO3 single crystal and the orientation effects

Enwei Sun 1,2, Wenwu Cao 1,2,a), Wenhua Jiang 2, Pengdi Han 3
PMCID: PMC3155577  PMID: 21863125

Abstract

Multidomain relaxor-based single crystals have intrigued the enthusiasm of many researchers due to their superior electromechanical properties. In order to understand the physical origin of multidomain properties, one must know the complete set of material coefficients in single domain state. Previous published single domain data were all measured under bias because single domain state is unstable. Here, we report a set of single domain data without bias for rhombohedral 0.24Pb(In1∕2Nb1∕2)O3-0.49Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-0.27PbTiO3 single crystal. Comparing rotated coefficients from single domain data with measured multidomain material coefficients, we concluded that the orientation effects account for more than 90% of the observed multidomain properties.


Multidomain relaxor-based ferroelectric single crystals, (1-x)Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-xPbTiO3 (PMN-xPT) and (1-x)Pb(Zn1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-xPbTiO3 (PZN-xPT) with compositions near the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) exhibit giant piezoelectric properties (d33 > 2000 pC∕N) and very high electromechanical coupling factor (>90%). They were already used in high end medical imaging transducers, and may lead to revolutionary changes in next generation sensors, actuators, and other electromechanical devices.1, 2, 3, 4 In order to understand the origin of such large electromechanical properties in multidomain states, it is necessary to know the complete set of single domain properties. Such data will also allow theoretical explorations on the optimum orientation cut.5, 6, 7 However, it was found that all binary PMN-PT and PZN-PT single crystals cannot maintain the single domain state without bias. Up to date, there is only one set of single domain data for binary systems in the literature, i.e., [111]c poled single-domain PMN-0.33PT single crystal, which was obtained under a dc bias in all samples in order to maintain their single-domain state.8

Recently, Liu et al. reported another complete set of material properties of single-domain 0.26Pb(In1∕2Nb1∕2)O3-0.46Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-0.28PbTiO3 (0.26PIN-0.46PMN-0.28PT) ternary single crystal under dc bias.9 They have also estimated the external field influence and found that the application of the dc bias will cause about 5% and 10% changes in the elastic compliance s11E and elastic constant c33D, respectively.9 This means that the corresponding calculations based on the biased data will not give accurate account for the orientation contribution in the multidomain crystals. The relaxor-based ferroelectric ternary xPb(In1∕2Nb1∕2)O3-(1-x-y)Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-yPbTiO3 (PIN-PMN-PT) single crystal system shows much higher coercive fields (EC ∼ 5–6 kV∕cm) than that of PMN-PT single crystals (EC ∼ 2–3 kV∕cm).10, 11 Through proper poling procedure, we were able to stabilize the single domain state in 0.24Pb(In1∕2Nb1∕2)O3-0.49Pb(Mg1∕3Nb2∕3)O3-0.27PbTiO3 (0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT) single crystal, which allows us to obtain a complete set of single domain data in a relaxor-based single crystal in natural conditions.

The 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single crystal used in this work was grown by the modified Bridgman method and all samples used were properly oriented by the Laue machine with an accuracy of ±0.5°. Samples of desired geometries were cut from the same slice of a crystal boule with uniform composition. Each sample was polished into parallelepiped shape with the three pairs of surfaces along [110]c, [112]c, and [111]c (the crystal axes were adopted according to Ref. 12). In addition, a k33 bar with three pairs of parallel surfaces along [100]c, [010]c, and [001]c was also prepared for the [001]c poled multi-domain state measurements. The samples were sputtered with gold electrodes on the opposite [111]c or [001]c surfaces, and poled at 10 kV∕cm in silicone oil at room temperature. The single-domain state of [111]c poled sample was confirmed by polarizing microscope. For the rhombohedral 3m symmetry, there are total 12 independent material constants to be determined: 6 elastic, 4 piezoelectric, and 2 dielectric constants. We used combined resonance and ultrasonic methods together with capacitance measurements to get 17 independent combinations, which allowed us to determine uniquely these coefficients with high degree of self-consistency. Self-consistency is of vital importance in the complete set of material properties. Lack of self-consistency will lead to wrong simulated designs and create conceptual confusions as discussed recently in Refs. 13, 14.

In resonance measurements, the dimensions and geometries of vibrators were specified by the IEEE standards on piezoelectricity.15 The resonance and anti-resonance frequencies were obtained by an HP 4194A impedance-phase gain analyzer, which were used to calculate the electromechanical coupling factors k31, k33, kt, piezoelectric strain constants d31, d33, elastic compliance constants s11E, s11D, s33E, s33D, and elastic stiffness constants c33E, c33D, respectively. The free and clamped dielectric constants ɛ11T, ɛ33T, ɛ11S, ɛ33S were determined from the low (1 kHz) and high frequency (2fa) capacitance measurements.

In ultrasonic measurements, a 0.5 cm cube sample with the orientations of [110]c × [112]c × [111]c was used. A 15 MHz longitudinal wave transducer (Ultran Laboratories, Inc.) and a 20 MHz shear wave transducer (Panametrics Com.) were used for the ultrasonic pulse-echo measurements. The transducers were excited by a 200 MHz pulser∕receiver (Panametrics Com.) and the time of flight between echoes was measured using a Tektronix 460A digital oscilloscope. The phase velocities of the longitudinal and shear waves were measured along [110]c, [112]c, and [111]c, respectively. From them, seven elastic stiffness constants c11E, c14D, c33D, c44E (=c55E), c44D (=c55D), c66E, and c66D can be deduced based on the Christoffel wave equations.

A computational algorithm was developed utilizing those excess number of measurements to guarantee self-consistency of the final full set material constants. The measured and derived elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of the 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single-domain single crystal poled along [111]c are given in Table TABLE I..

Table 1.

Measured and derived material constants of [111]c poled 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single-domain single crystal. [Directly measured constants are indicated by star (*).]

Elastic stiffness constants: cijE and cijD (1010 N∕m2)
c11E* c12E c13E c14E c33E c44E* c66E*  
20.26 9.02 5.32 −2.67 18.47 2.34 5.62  
c11D c12D c13D c14D* c33D* c44D* c66D  
20.38 9.10 4.80 −2.33 21.29 7.90 5.64  
Elastic compliance constants: sijE and sijD (10−12 m2∕N)
s11E* s12E s13E s14E s33E s44E s66E  
11.62 −7.81 −1.10 22.17 6.05 93.33 38.86  
s11D s12D s13D s14D s33D* s44D s66D  
6.87 −3.21 −0.83 2.93 5.07 14.23 20.15  
Piezoelectric coefficients: eiλ(C∕m2), diλ (10−12 C∕N), giλ (10−3 Vm∕N), and hiλ (108 V∕m)
e15 e22 e31 e33 d15 d22 d31* d33*
20.99 −1.28 −2.16 11.62 2015 −490 −21 75
g15 g22 g31 g33 h15 h22 h31 h33
39.26 −9.55 −3.65 13.04 26.92 −1.64 −4.51 24.25
Dielectric constants: ɛij0) and β(10−4∕ɛ0)
ɛ11S* ɛ33S* ɛ11T* ɛ33T* β11S β33S β11T β33T
881 541 5800 650 11.35 18.47 1.72 15.39
Electromechanical coupling factors kij and density (kg∕m3)
k15 k31* k33* kt* density      
0.84 0.08 0.40 0.36 8095      

It was found that the piezoelectric constant d33 and electromechanical coupling factor k33 are only 75 pC∕N and 40%, respectively, in the single domain state, which are much lower than that of [001]c or [011]c poled PIN-PMN-PT multi-domain single crystals. However, the shear piezoelectric constant d15 of single domain 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT is 2015 pC∕N, much higher than its other piezoelectric constants, viz., d31, d22, and d33. In fact, it was recognized that the origin of the large piezoelectric properties d33 in [001]c poled multi-domain single crystal is mainly from the contribution of large shear property d15 of the single-domain state.5

As shown in Fig. 1, the orientation dependence of material constants has been calculated for [111]c poled 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single-domain single crystal based on the measured full matrix single-domain data. The property transformation is performed based on the standard matrix transformation for piezoelectric materials.16 It can be seen that the maximum values of material constants, d33 = 1076 × 10−12 C∕N, s33E = 40.17 × 10−12 m2∕N, ɛ33T = 5800, and k33 = 0.87, occur in the directions of 60.3°, 52.6°, 90°, and 53.3° from the spontaneous polarization direction [111]c, respectively. The [001]c direction is 54.7° from the poling direction [111]c, we can calculate the rotated longitudinal material constants along [001]c in the [111]c-[112]c plane from the single domain data. These calculated values are: d33 = 1048 × 10−12 C∕N, s33E = 40.03 × 10−12 m2∕N, ɛ33T = 4080, and k33 = 0.87, respectively. In addition, the elastic compliance constant s33D and piezoelectric charge constant g33 can be calculated, s33D=s33E(1-k332) = 9.60 × 10−12 m2∕N and g33=d33ɛ33T= 29.03 × 10−3 Vm∕N along [001]c, respectively. As shown in Table TABLE II., the rotated material constants along [001]c are very close to the measured constants for [001]c poled multidomain single crystal. In fact, the electromechanical coupling factor k33 is exactly the same. This shows that the orientation effect plays a major role in the multidomain material properties of this relaxor-based ferroelectric single crystal, particularly for longitudinal properties.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(Color online) Orientation dependence of (a) piezoelectric strain constant d33, (b) elastic compliance constant s33E, (c) dielectric constant ɛ33T, and (d) electromechanical coupling factor k33 of [111]c poled single domain 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single crystal in the [111]c-[112]c plane.

Table 2.

Comparison between rotated single-domain properties along [001]c and the directly measured [001]c poled multi-domain crystal properties for 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT single crystal.

  Rotated single-domain properties along [001]c Measured constants for [001]c poled multi-domain crystal Ratio of rotated constant to measured constant
d33 1048 1109 95%
s33E 40.03 43.48 92%
ɛ33T 4080 4222 97%
k33 0.87 0.87 100%
s33D 9.60 10.53 91%
g33 29.03 29.68 98%

In summary, we have measured a complete set of elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric constants of single-domain 0.24PIN-0.49PMN-0.27PT ternary single crystal poled along [111]c in natural conditions by using combined resonance and ultrasonic methods.

Up to date, no other complete sets of material constants for relaxor-based ferroelectric single crystals, including both binary and ternary systems, have been reported in the literature. The unbiased completed set of single domain data allowed us to get more accurate account of the contributions from orientation effects in the mutidomain properties through matrix transformation. In the longitudinal coefficients, the orientation effects play the dominant role, particularly for the giant piezoelectric d33 coefficient and the very large electromechanical coupling factor k33.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the NIH under Grant No. P41-EB21820 and by H. C. Materials Inc.

References

  1. Park S. E. and Shrout T. R., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1804 (1997). 10.1063/1.365983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang R., Jiang B., and Cao W., J. Appl. Phys. 90, 3471 (2001). 10.1063/1.1390494 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo Y., Luo H., Chen K., Xu H., Zhang X., and Yin Z., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6134 (2002). 10.1063/1.1516256 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lim L. C. and Rajan K. K., J. Cryst. Growth 271, 435 (2004). 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.07.081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang R., Jiang B., and Cao W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3737 (2003). 10.1063/1.1576510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu. Topolov V., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 2115 (2004). 10.1063/1.365983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jin J., Rajan K. K., and Lim L. C., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 8744 (2006). 10.1143/JJAP.45.8744 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang R., Jiang B., and Cao W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 787 (2003). 10.1063/1.1541937 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu X., Zhang S., Luo J., Shrout T. R., and Cao W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 012907 (2010). 10.1063/1.2978333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang S., Luo J., Hackenberger W., and Shrout T. R., J. Appl. Phys. 104, 064106 (2008). 10.1063/1.365983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tian J., Han P., Huang X., Pan H., J. F.CarrollIII, and Payne D. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 222903, (2007). 10.1143/JJAP.39.5581 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang R. and Cao W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6380 (2004). 10.1007/s100190050014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu. Topolov V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 196101 (2010). 10.1063/1.2907702 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yu. Topolov V. and Bowen C. R., J. Appl. Phys. 109, 094107 (2011). 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00015-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. ANSI/IEEE Std. 176-1987, IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity (IEEE, New York, 1987), p. 176. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cady W. G., Piezoeletricity (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1946). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Physics Letters are provided here courtesy of American Institute of Physics

RESOURCES