Clinical Presentation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in Asian-Americans Versus Non-Asian-Americans

Abstract

The incidence of HCC is rising worldwide. Studies on ethnicity-based clinical presentation of HCC remain limited. The aim is to compare the clinical presentation and stage of HCC between Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americans. This retrospective study assessed ethnicity-based differences in HCC presentation, including demographics, laboratory results, diagnosis of underlying liver disease, and stage of HCC. Of 276 patients, 162 were Asian-Americans and 114 were non-Asian-Americans. Compared to non-Asian-Americans, Asian-Americans had a significantly higher incidence of history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (55.0% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001), family history of HBV infection (12.5% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001) and HCC (15.2% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.002), but lower incidence of history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (37.5% vs. 61.6%, P < 0.001). At diagnosis of HCC, Asian-American patients had a significantly lower frequency of hepatic encephalopathy (8.9% vs. 29.3%, P = 0.001), and ascites (26.7% vs. 57.3%, P < 0.001). Asian-Americans had lower Child-Pugh scores (class A: 62.0% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.001), and MELD scores (9.2 ± 4.4 vs. 12.0 ± 6.4, P = 0.02), and presented with a lower stage of HCC by Okuda staging (I: 43.8% vs. 22.8%, P = 0.001). Asian-American patients with HCC presented with a higher incidence of history and family history of HBV infection, lower incidence of hepatic decompensation, lower Child and MELD scores, and an early stage HCC disease.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in men and the eighth most common cancer in women worldwide [1], and it constitutes 4.6% of all new cancer cases, 6.3% in men and 2.7% in women [2]. Prognosis of HCC, especially late stage HCC, is usually poor, and it ranks fourth among causes of global cancer mortality [3].

It is well known that the prevalence of HCC is much higher in Asian countries than in other parts of the world [1]. Likewise, in the United States, the highest incidence of HCC was reported in Asian/Pacific Islanders compared to all other ethnic groups [4, 5]. The overall incidence of HCC is rising [6–9], and the risk factors for HCC vary among ethnic groups in the United States. The most commonly noted difference identifies hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection as the most common risk factor in Asians and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcoholic cirrhosis as the most common risk factors in non-Asians [10–12]. Survival may also vary between ethnic groups in the United States, although this remains less clear. In a single center study in the Northeast United States, poor prognostic factors were felt to be similar across all races [12]. A study in Hawaii reported significant differences in Child Pugh score and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program Investigators (CLIP) stage between Asians, non-Asians, and Pacific-Islanders with HCC [13]. This study also reported that Asian and Pacific-Islander Americans had lower 1- and 3-year survival rates compared to non-Asians [13]. However, in a registry review of five metropolitan areas in the United States (West Coast, Atlanta, Detroit), increased survival was noted in Asians compared to Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks [14]. In contrast, a study from Southern California reported worse clinical outcomes of HCC in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients [15]. Thus, further studies are needed to address these issues.

In the present study, we retrospectively compared the clinical presentation and stage of HCC between Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americans in a single university medical center in Southern California.

Patients and Methods

Patient Population

The present study was conducted retrospectively. The study protocol was approved, and informed consent was exempted by the institutional review boards. Medical records of 359 outpatients who presented to the University of California Irvine, Medical Center (UCIMC) between 1999 and 2005 with liver mass lesions presumed to be HCC were consecutively and systematically reviewed. The diagnosis of HCC and inclusion criteria were based on the AASLD guidelines [16] that included: (1) a new diagnosis by pathology; (2) new clinical diagnosis of HCC by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/ml with one new hepatic defect on imaging, 3 different imaging studies identifying new mass, new defect with massive involvement and death, or new defect with rising AFP; or (3) new probable diagnosis of HCC with new defect seen on 1–2 modes of imaging and treated as HCC [16, 17]. Eighty-three patients were excluded (10 diagnosed in 1998 or earlier, 22 had metastatic cancer but non- HCC, 22 did not have liver mass lesions by repeated imaging, 29 with unlocatable chart). A total of 276 patients were included in the study after exclusion criteria were applied.

Methods and Data Collection

Data that were collected included age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI); social history (alcohol, tobacco, intravenous drug abuse [IVDA], history of blood transfusion); family history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HCC; history of viral hepatitis B and C; presence of complications of chronic liver disease at presentation of HCC (including ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy by international normalized ratio [INR], and jaundice by total bilirubin). Other laboratory data at presentation of HCC that were collected included serum AFP, platelet count, and imaging findings, including the number and size of the liver lesions and presence of nodes or metastases.

HBV infection was diagnosed by positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA (by PCR) >1,000 copies/ml. HCV infection was diagnosed by positive hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV), HCV RNA, or documented history of HCV infection. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on pathology or clinical criteria, defined as radiographic evidence of a nodular liver, a grossly nodular liver upon direct visualization during surgery, or based on the calculation of the discriminant score [18]. Severity of cirrhosis was determined by calculating the Child Pugh score [19] and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores [20]. Staging of HCC was assessed by AJCC TNM score [21], Okuda score [22] and CLIP score [23].

Statistical Analyses

The descriptive data were presented as percentage or continuous data with mean with standard deviation. Either Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Student’s t test was used to compare frequencies or means, respectively. Variables with a potential significance (P < 0.10) in univariate analyses were included in multivariate analysis in forward stepwise logistic regression. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with associated P values for each variable were reported. A P value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical Package for Social Sciences 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for data analysis.

Results

Baseline Demographics in Asian-American Versus Non-Asian-American Patients with HCC

As summarized in Table 1, in 276 patients, there were 162 Asian-Americans and 114 non-Asian-Americans. The mean age (61.5 ± 10.6 vs. 60.7 ± 11.6, P = 0.56) and proportion of male patients (80.9% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.21) at diagnosis were similar in both groups. The Asian-American subjects had a significantly lower mean body mass index (24.0 ± 3.6 vs. 27.6 ± 5.5, P < 0.001), incidence of alcohol use (22.5% vs. 49.5%, P < 0.001), tobacco use (47.6% vs. 65.7%, P = 0.004), IVDA (1.4% vs. 19.6%, P < 0.001), and prior transfusion history (35.4% vs. 59.3%, P = 0.009); but a higher incidence of family history of hepatitis B (12.5% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001) and HCC (15.2% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.002). There was a higher incidence of hepatitis B infection (55.0% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of hepatitis C (37.5% vs. 61.6%, P < 0.001) in Asian-Americans.

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of Asian-American versus Non-Asian-American patients with HCC

Variables	Asian-Americans (n = 162)	Non-Asians (n = 114)	P-value
Age at diagnosis (years)
≥50	142/161 (88.2%)	95/114 (83.3%)	0.249
Gender
Males	131/162 (80.9%)	85/114 (74.6%)	0.211
BMI
≥30	3/62 (4.8%)	16/54 (29.6%)	<0.001
Social habits
Alcohol	34/151 (22.5%)	55/111 (49.5%)	<0.001
Tobacco	70/147 (47.6%)	69/105 (65.7%)	0.004
IVDA	2/140 (1.4%)	20/102 (19.6%)	<0.001
Transfusion history	23/65 (35.4%)	32/54 (59.3%)	0.009
Family history
Hepatitis B	17/136 (12.5%)	0/102 (0%)	<0.001
Hepatitis C	7/134 (5.2%)	1/101 (1.0%)	0.142
HCC	21/138 (15.2%)	3/102 (2.9%)	0.002
History of viral hepatitis
HBV	60/109 (55.0%)	3/61 (4.9%)	<0.001
HCV	57/152 (37.5%)	69/112 (61.6%)	<0.001
AFP
≥400 ng/ml	39/128 (30.5%)	32/95 (33.7%)	0.610
Platelet
<130 × 109/l	64/132 (48.5%)	58/102 (56.9%)	0.203
INR
≥1.2	41/121 (33.9%)	46/94 (48.9%)	0.026
AST
≥40 IU/l	113/133 (85.6%)	88/101 (87.1%)	0.738
ALT
≥40 IU/l	103/132 (78.0%)	79/100 (79.0%)	0.859
AST/ALT
≥1.00	84/131 (64.1%)	81/100 (81.0%)	0.005
Albumin
<3.0 g/dl	33/136 (24.3%)	45/98 (45.9%)	0.001
Total bilirubin
≥1.7 mg/dl	26/135 (19.3%)	39/99 (39.4%)	0.001

Underlying Cirrhosis in Asian-American Versus Non-Asian-American Patients at Presentation

As summarized in Table 2, the frequency of cirrhosis at HCC presentation was 55.6% in Asian-Americans and 65.8% in Non-Asian-Americans (P = 0.088). Fewer Asian-Americans presented with decompensated liver disease (31.1% vs. 61.3%, P < 0.001), including hepatic encephalopathy (8.9% vs. 29.3%, P = 0.001) and ascites (26.7% vs. 57.3%, P < 0.001). In addition, Child-Pugh scores (class A: 62.0% vs. 31.4%; class B and C: 38.0% vs. 68.6%; P < 0.001) and mean MELD scores (9.2 ± 4.4 vs. 12.0 ± 6.4, P = 0.02) were lower in Asian-Americans than in non-Asian-Americans.

Table 2.

Cirrhosis and the clinical severity in Asian versus Non-Asian-American patient at HCC presentation

Variables	Asian-Americans (n = 162)	Non-Asians(n = 114)	P-value
Presence of cirrhosis	90/162 (55.6%)	75/114 (65.8%)	0.088
Hepatic decompensation	28/90 (31.1%)	46/75 (61.3%)	<0.001
Ascites	24/90 (26.7%)	43/75 (57.3%)	<0.001
Encephalopathy	8/90 (8.9%)	22/75 (29.3%)	0.001
Total bilirubin > 3.0	8/82 (9.8%)	15/72 (20.8%)	0.054
INR > 1.7	4/79 (5.1%)	4/69 (5.8%)	1.000
Child-pugh class
A	49/79 (62.0%)	22/70 (31.4%)	<0.001
B and C	30/79 (38.0%)	48/70 (68.6%)
MELD scoring
Mean ± SD	9.2 ± 4.4	12.0 ± 6.4	0.002
≥10	28/78 (35.9%)	43/69 (62.3%)	0.001

HCC Stage in Asian-American Versus Non-Asian-American Patients at Presentation

Asian-Americans presented with an earlier stage of HCC by Okuda (I: 43.8% vs. 22.8%; II and III: 56.3% vs. 77.2%; P = 0.001), but not by AJCC TNM or CLIP score system (data not shown). A subsequent analysis of variables that may be associated with Okuda HCC staging was then performed. As summarized in Table 3, the male patients were more likely to present with early stage HCC (Okuda I) than late stage HCC (Okuda II and III) on univariate analysis (87.0% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.034). Risk factors associated more with later Okuda stages II and III than early Okuda stage I on univariate analysis include alcohol use (40.1% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.05) and IVDA (12.4% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.036). Subjects with a family history of HCC tended to present with earlier Okuda stage. Additionally, elevated serum AFP, AST, AST/ALT ratio, and presence of hepatic encephalopathy were associated with Okuda stage II-III HCC. As summarized in Table 4, multivariate analysis indicated that race was an independent predictor of Okuda stage of HCC. That is, Asian-American patients are more likely to present with Okuda stage I, while non-Asian-Americans are more likely to present with Okuda stage II-III. Additionally, an AST/ALT ratio ≥1, AST ≥ 40 IU/l, and serum AFP ≥400 ng/ml were also independently associated with Okuda staging II-III HCC.

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of HCC Patients with Okuda stage I versus II and III

Variables	Okuda I (n = 77)	Okuda II and III (n = 143)	P-value
Race
Asian-Americans	56/77 (72.7%)	72/143 (50.3%)	0.001
Gender
Male	67/77 (87.0%)	107/143 (74.8%)	0.034
Age at diagnosis
≥50	71/77 (92.2%)	119/143 (83.2%)	0.064
BMI
≥30	7/38 (18.4%)	9/58 (15.5%)	0.709
Social habits
Alcohol	20/75 (26.7%)	55/137 (40.1%)	0.050
Tobacco	42/75 (56.0%)	70/133 (52.6%)	0.640
IVDA	2/70 (2.9%)	16/129 (12.4%)	0.036
Transfusion history	17/41 (41.5%)	33/58 (56.9%)	0.130
Family history
HBV	5/69 (7.2%)	9/121 (7.4%)	1.000
HCV	4/68 (5.9%)	2/120 (1.7%)	0.191
HCC	13/69 (18.8%)	8/123 (6.5%)	0.009
History of viral hepatitis
HBV	22/52 (42.3%)	29/92 (31.5%)	0.194
HCV	39/74 (52.7%)	63/136 (46.3%)	0.377
AFP
≥400 ng/ml	14/70 (20.0%)	50/129 (38.8%)	0.007
Platelet
<130 × 109/l	42/73 (57.5%)	73/141 (51.8%)	0.423
AST
≥40 IU/l	56/73 (76.7%)	129/141 (91.5%)	0.003
ALT
≥40 IU/l	59/75 (78.7%)	109/139 (78.4%)	0.966
AST/ALT
≥1.00	39/74 (52.7%)	113/139 (81.3%)	<0.001
Hepatic encephalopathy	2/56 (3.6%)	28/92 (30.4%)	<0.001

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with Okuda stage II and III HCC

Variables	Odds ratio	95% CI	P-value
Asian-Americans	0.452	0.229–0.893	0.022
AST/ALT ≥ 1.0	3.404	1.680–6.895	0.001
AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml	2.707	1.269–5.776	0.010
AST ≥ 40 IU/l	3.326	1.328–8.327	0.010

HCC Presentation in Patients with HBV Infection Versus HCV Infection

As summarized in Table 5, the majority of HCC patients with chronic HBV were Asian-Americans (95.2%) while less than half the HCC patients with chronic HCV were Asian-American (45.2%, P < 0.001). There were more male HCC patients with HBV than HCV (88.9% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.034). A history of IVDA (0% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001) and blood transfusion before 1992 (17.4% vs. 65.7%, P < 0.001) were less likely in HCC patients with chronic HBV infection compared to those with chronic HCV. A family history of hepatitis B (28.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.098) was more likely to occur in HCC patients with chronic HBV infection compared to those with chronic HCV. The frequencies of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (by ascites and hepatic encephalopathy), and higher Child class (i.e., B and C) were significantly higher in patients with HCC and chronic HCV infection than in those with HCC and chronic HBV infection. Consistently, the frequencies of thrombocytopenia, a high AST/ALT ratio, and hypoalbuminemia were significantly higher in those with HCC and chronic HCV infection. HCC patients with HBV had lower Child Pugh scores compared to those with HCV. However, HBV or HCV infection was not associated with MELD score or Okuda stage of HCC in these patients.

Table 5.

Univariate analysis of HCC patients with hepatitis B versus hepatitis C

Variables	Hepatitis B (n = 63)	Hepatitis C (n = 126)	P-value
Race
Asian-Americans	60/63 (95.2%)	57/126 (45.2%)	<0.001
Gender
Male	56/63 (88.9%)	92/126 (73.0%)	0.013
Age at diagnosis
≥50	49/62 (79.0%)	108/126 (85.7%)	0.246
BMI
≥30	1/25 (4.0%)	12/60 (20.0%)	0.096
Social habits
Alcohol	15/60 (25.0%)	43/121 (35.5%)	0.153
Tobacco	27/58 (46.6%)	70/114 (61.4%)	0.063
IVDA	0/55 (0%)	22/113 (19.5%)	<0.001
Transfusion	4/23 (17.4%)	46/70 (65.7%)	<0.001
Family history
HBV	15/53 (28.3%)	0/108 (0%)	<0.001
HCV	0/51 (0%)	7/108 (6.5%)	0.098
HCC	12/54 (22.2%)	6/109 (5.5%)	0.001
AFP
≥10 ng/ml	42/53 (79.2%)	90/108 (83.3%)	0.526
Platelet
<130 × 109/l	23/53 (43.4%)	70/109 (64.2%)	0.012
INR
≥1.2	18/47 (38.3%)	44/101 (43.6%)	0.594
AST
≥40 IU/l	43/51 (84.3%)	101/111 (91.0%)	0.209
ALT
≥40 IU/l	38/49 (77.6%)	96/112 (85.7%)	0.202
AST/ALT
≥1.00	28/49 (57.1%)	87/111 (78.4%)	0.006
Albumin
≤3.0 g/dl	10/54 (18.5%)	49/109 (45.0%)	0.001
Total bilirubin
≥1.7 mg/dl	11/52 (21.2%)	33/110 (30.0%)	0.262
Diagnosis of cirrhosis	34/63 (54.0%)	94/126 (66.7%)	0.004
Hepatic decompensation
Ascites	6/34 (17.6%)	46/94 (48.9%)	0.001
Encephalopathy	0/34 (0%)	18/94 (19.1%)	0.003
Child-pugh class
A	21/56 (37.5%)	35/56 (62.5%)	0.003
B and C	8/59 (13.6%)	51/59 (86.4%)
MELD of cirrhotics
≥10	11/28 (39.3%)	38/85 (44.7%)	0.616
Okuda
I	22/61 (36.1%)	39/61 (63.9%)	0.559
II and III	29/92 (31.5%)	63/92 (68.5%)

When further comparing the clinical presentation of HBV-related versus HCV-related HCC in 117 Asian-American patients, elevated ALT and AST were significantly higher in HBV-related versus HCV-related HCC [ALT: 42/47 (89.4%) vs. 35/52 (67.3%); AST: 44/48 (91.7%) vs. 38/51 (74.5%)]. Presentation of cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class B and C were less common, but not significantly different, in HBV-related than in HCV-related HCC [Cirrhosis: 32/60 (53.3%) vs. 40/57 (70.2%); Child B/C: 8/27 (29.6%) vs. 16/36 (44.4%)]. Other parameters, including age, gender, history of alcohol use, IVDU or transfusion, and family history of HCC were not significantly different in both groups.

Discussion

The most significant conclusion from this study is that Asian-Americans with HCC in our cohort presented with earlier stage liver disease compared to non-Asian-Americans. Though not statistically significant, fewer Asian-Americans had cirrhosis. However, the Asian-Americans who did have cirrhosis had statistically significant earlier stage cirrhosis by Child-Pugh and MELD score. Furthermore, being Asian-American was independently associated with lower Okuda score on multivariate analysis. There may be several explanations for these findings.

One main reason is the higher incidence of HBV in the Asian-American patients with HCC compared to non-Asian HCC patients, which has been shown in this study as it has in many previous studies. There is a higher incidence of HCC in pre-cirrhotic individuals with HBV, and chronic HBV infection can promote hepatocarcinogenesis in the absence of cirrhosis [24]. When HBV patients with HCC and HCV patients with HCC were directly compared in our study, those with HBV did have significantly lower Child Pugh scores than those with HCV. However, the mean MELD score and Okuda score were not significantly different in both groups.

Two other possible explanations for earlier stage liver disease in Asian-Americans with HCC are the lower incidence of alcohol use in Asian-Americans and the lower percentage of Asian-American patients with BMI ≥ 30. Previous studies have linked excessive alcohol use to the development of HCC [25, 26], and concomitant alcohol use in the setting of other underlying liver disease may accelerate the progression of liver disease. The same line of reasoning may be used for patients with a BMI ≥30 as these patients are at increased risk of developing non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis [27].

One other possible explanation for the earlier stage liver disease in our cohort of Asian-Americans with HCC is implementation of HCC screening. It has been reported that healthcare providers with Asian language abilities and greater knowledge of HBV risk factors and screening guidelines were more likely to screen for HBV [28, 29]. Given the high number of Southeast Asians who live in Southern California, it cannot be discounted that healthcare providers taking care of our cohort of patients may been more aware of specific issues related to Asian-Americans, such as higher incidence of HBV and the need to screen for HCC. However, further studies will be needed to determine whether appropriately screened patients actually resulted in an earlier diagnosis of HCC in these patients.

Our study emphasizes another important point that is often overlooked. Although HBV is very prevalent in the Asian community as a cause of HCC, HCV is also important and accounted for 37% the HCC in Asian patients in this study. This is consistent with the reported prevalence of HCV in Asian populations at 3–8% in Southeast Asia [30]. Though HCV-cirrhosis is more often associated with HCC [31–34], a significant incidence of HCC was found in patients with pre-cirrhotic fibrosis in the prospective HALT C trial [35, 36]. It is clear that besides HBV, HCV is also a major cause of HCC in the Asian population. These patients should be identified and screened regularly along with those patients with hepatitis B.

The presence of cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation may impact the management and outcome of HCC. Decompensated liver disease may contraindicate surgical resection [37–39], or other ablation therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation [39–41]. Wong et al. reported that Asian and Pacific-Islander American patients with HCC presented with earlier stage cirrhosis compared to non-Asian American patients [13]. However, as treatment data and survival data were not collected, this present study was not able determine whether a lower frequency of decompensated cirrhosis, together with earlier stage of HCC, would imply a better outcome of HCC in Asian-American patients, which has been reported previously [14, 42, 43].

In summary, in our single center cohort study of HCC patients, being Asian-American was an independent risk factor predicting earlier Okuda stage on multivariate analysis, and Asian-Americans presented with earlier stage cirrhosis. Obviously, there were severe limitations to our study, including the retrospective nature of the study, referral bias, and the study being solely at a single tertiary care center. Additionally, the present study was not able to compare HCC presentation among subgroups of Asian Americans. Thus, the results should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, our study underscores the need for further prospective studies to identify specific factors placing patients at higher risk for HCC and to appropriately screen these patients in hopes of an earlier diagnosis and, therefore, better options for managing HCC.