Abstract
Ninety-six feral cats from Prince Edward Island were used to determine the prevalence of selected infectious agents. The prevalence rates were 5.2% for feline immunodeficiency virus, 3.1% for feline leukemia virus, 3.1% for Mycoplasma haemofelis, 8.4% for Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum, 2.1% for Bartonella spp. and 29.8% for exposure to Toxoplasma gondii. Oocysts of T. gondii were detected in 1.3% of the fecal samples that were collected. Gender and retroviral status of the cats were significantly correlated with hemoplasma infections. Use of a flea comb showed that 9.6% of the cats had fleas; however, flea infestation was not associated with any of the infectious agents.
Résumé
Prévalence des maladies infectieuses chez une population de chats féraux de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard, Canada. Quatre-vingt-seize chats féraux de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard ont été utilisés pour déterminer la prévalence de certains agents infectieux. Les taux de prévalence étaient de 5,2 % pour le virus de l’immunodéficience féline, de 3,1 % pour le virus de la leucose féline, de 3,1 % pour Mycoplasma haemofelis, de 8,4 % pour Candidatus Mycoplasma hœmominutum, de 2,1 % pour Bartonella spp. et de 29,8 % pour l’exposition à Toxoplasma gondii. Des ookystes de T. gondii ont été détectés dans 1,3 % des échantillons de fèces qui ont été prélevés. Il y avait une corrélation importante entre le sexe et le statut rétroviral des chats avec les infections à hémoplasmes. L’usage d’un peigne à puces a montré que 9,6 % des chats avaient des puces; cependant, l’infestation de puces n’était associée à aucun agent infectieux.
(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières)
Introduction
Feral cats can serve as a direct or indirect source of infectious diseases for outdoor pet cats. Feline hemotrophic mycoplasmas are red blood cell pathogens which can cause hemolytic anemia and severe clinical disease in affected cats (1). Three etiologic agents, collectively called hemoplasmas, have been identified: Mycoplasma haemofelis, Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum, and Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis (2). M. haemofelis is associated with hemolytic anemia in cats (2,3). M. haemominutum is usually not associated with clinical disease and typically causes anemia in immuno-compromised cats (2–4). A recent case report from Europe identified Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis as a potential cause of disease in an immuno-competent cat (2–4).
Toxoplasma gondii can cause clinical disease in cats and has zoonotic potential (5,6). Outdoor cats, due to increased chance for predatory behavior, are more likely to contract the pathogen and act as a significant source of the infection for humans (5). The most important sources for human T. gondii infection are contaminated inadequately cooked meat and vegetables, and close contact with cat feces containing infectious T. gondii oocysts (5,6). Contaminated water was also recently recognized as a potential source for humans (5).
Bartonella spp. include many fastidious organisms which were recently recognized as emerging feline pathogens (7–11). Infection with these pathogens does not always result in clinical disease (9), but isolated reports described cats in which clinical disease resolved after diagnosis and treatment for Bartonella (9). Cat-to-cat transmission of Bartonella henselae usually occurs via fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) (7–11), while the mode of transmission for other feline Bartonella organisms is unknown. Cats are also frequently recognized as a primary reservoir for human infection (7–11). The most severe clinical signs are seen in immuno-compromised humans such as those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (11).
Feline retroviruses [feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)] are widespread feline pathogens that can affect all cats; however, adult, outdoor male cats are at higher risk of contracting the pathogens (12). Retroviruses can be associated with clinical disease in affected cats and can also predispose the affected cats to other diseases including infectious diseases (3).
The goal of the current study was to determine the prevalence of M. haemofelis, M. haemominutum, Bartonella spp. and exposure to T. gondii, in a feral cat population on Prince Edward Island. Species of Bartonella included in the study were feline pathogens, B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae. The retroviral status of each cat, the presence of fleas, and the presence of T. gondii oocysts were also determined. Eggs or segments of other parasitic pathogens such as roundworms, hookworms, coccidia, and tapeworms discovered during fecal examination allowed determination of the prevalence of these parasites. The relationship between the infectious agents under investigation and age, sex, and flea infestation was also determined.
Materials and methods
Feral cats presenting to the Atlantic Veterinary College (AVC) spay and neuter program were enrolled in the study. The feral cats were defined as free-roaming non-owned intact cats exhibiting feral temperament. The study design was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Atlantic Veterinary College (AVC), University of Prince Edward Island. Cats were humanely trapped the night before presentation to the AVC. Data collection occurred between March and September of 2009.
For each cat, body weight, approximate age, gender, and assigned feral cat colony number were recorded. Cats were classified as either adult or juvenile based on weight and appearance of the teeth. Cats that weighed less than 2 kg and had deciduous teeth were classified as juveniles; all others were classified as adults. Ninety-six cats were enrolled in the study. All cats underwent general anesthesia, at which time venipuncture was performed and a 3-mL blood sample was obtained. A 1.5 mL volume of blood was placed into a potassium EDTA tube. The other 1.5 mL was placed into a glass tube without additives, allowed to clot, then centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 × g; serum was harvested. A small amount of blood from the potassium EDTA tube was used for a point of care enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of FIV antibodies and FeLV p27 antigen (SNAP Combo; IDEXX, Westbrook, Maine, USA) to determine the retroviral status of each cat. The manufacturer reports sensitivity for FeLV antigen and FIV antibody detection of 97.6% and 100%, respectively, and specificities of 99.1% and 99.5%, respectively (Package insert, SNAP Combo, IDEXX). Retrovirus-negative cats were spayed or castrated; retrovirus-positive cats were humanely euthanized after being checked for fleas and after a stool sample was obtained.
The rest of the blood sample was stored at 4°C overnight. The whole blood was sent to a commercial laboratory (Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, USA) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Bartonella spp., M. haemofelis, and M. haemominutum. Sensitivity and specificity of these PCR assays were not established at this time; however, any positive results were confirmed by an additional PCR assay (Steve Bolin, Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health-Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, USA, personal communication, 2010). Serum samples from each cat were submitted to the AVC diagnostic laboratory to determine the presence of T. gondii IgG antibodies. A serum agglutination test (Toxotest-MT “EIKEN”, San Diego, California, USA) was used, and an antibody titer of greater than 1:64 was deemed positive. Sensitivity and specificity of this test was previously reported elsewhere (13). A fecal sample, if available, was obtained digitally from the rectum. Stool samples were placed into sterile containers and stored at 4°C overnight. Stool analysis was performed 2 d later. Each cat was combed with 3 strokes (1 over dorsum and 2 over lateral sides) using a standard flea comb. A sheet of white paper was placed under each cat during combing in order to aid in detection of flea or flea dirt. Any cat that had flea dirt or fleas was classified as positive for fleas.
Fecal analysis was performed by the AVC diagnostic laboratory using a zinc sulfate fecal floatation technique. Samples were positive if eggs or segments of gastrointestinal parasites were visualized, or if T. gondii oocysts were present. The detection limit of fecal floatation for T. gondii oocysts was previously reported to be 250 oocysts/g of feces (14). Identification of gastrointestinal parasites based on findings of fecal floatation was performed.
After completion of the surgical procedure, each cat was vaccinated against feline viral rhinotracheitis, calicivirus, panleukopenia, and rabies virus. Each cat was permanently identified with a tattoo in the left pinna. After complete recovery from anesthesia each cat was released back into the area where it had been trapped.
Statistical analysis
Study population size was established to achieve a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and 8% margin of error. Categorical data were analyzed by using a chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was established at P < 0.05. Commercially available software (Minitab 15-MINITAB; State College, Pennsylvania, USA) was used for data analysis.
Results
Ninety-six feral cats trapped on Prince Edward Island were enrolled in the study. There were 39 females and 57 males (40.6% and 59.4%, respectively). Twenty-two cats were classified as juveniles (22.9%) and 74 cats were classified as adults (77.1%). The mean weight of juvenile cats was 1.3 kg (range: 0.6 to 1.8 kg), while the mean weight for adult cats was 3.7 kg (range: 2 to 6.2 kg). Three cats (3.1%) were positive for FeLV, while 5 cats (5.2%) were positive for FIV. One cat was positive for both FIV and FeLV (~1%). Twenty-eight cats (29.8%) had a positive titer for T. gondii, and data were missing for 2 cats. Three cats were positive for M. haemofelis (3.1%), 8 cats were positive for “Ca Mycoplasma haemominutum” (8.4%), and data were missing for 1 cat. Two cats (2.1%) were positive for Bartonella spp., while data were missing for 1 cat. Fecal samples were available for 78 cats and only 1 sample (1.3%) contained T. gondii oocysts. The cat shedding T. gondii oocysts had a serum T. gondii titer of 1:256. Toxocara cati eggs were found in 27 fecal samples (34%), while 11 cats were positive for Cystoisospora felis oocysts (14%). Taenia spp. segments were identified in 12 fecal samples (15%). No intestinal hookworms (Ancylostoma spp.) were detected. Nine cats had fleas or flea dirt (9.6%) at the time of examination.
“Ca Mycoplasma haemominutum”-positive cats were significantly more likely (P = 0.01) to be concurrently retrovirus-positive (FIV or FeLV) than were “Ca Mycoplasma haemominutum”-negative cats (3/8 and 4/87 respectively). Three out of 11 Mycoplasma-positive cats were also retrovirus positive. Gender played a significant role in hemoplasma infection as all the cats positive for M. haemofelis or “Ca Mycoplasma haemominutum” were male (P = 0.002). Although only 1 cat positive for retroviral infection was female, statistical significance for gender predisposition was not seen for retroviral infection (P = 0.23). There was no gender predisposition for T. gondii (P = 0.5) and Bartonella spp. infection (P = 0.5). No significance was reached when comparing T. gondii and retroviral positive cats (P = 0.6). Shedding of the T. gondii oocysts was detected in only 1 serologically positive cat. The age of the cats did not play a significant role in retroviral (P = 0.34), hemoplasma (P = 0.44), Bartonella spp. (P = 1), and T. gondii (P = 0.06) infections. None of the cats positive for Bartonella spp. were positive for a retrovirus, hemoplasma, or fleas. There was no statistically significant correlation between flea infestation and concurrent T. gondii (P = 1) serological positivity.
Discussion
This study investigated the prevalence of selected infectious diseases in a feral cat population in Prince Edward Island (Table 1). All investigated pathogens were present in the study population. “Ca Mycoplasma haemominutum” was the most prevalent hemoplasma which is contrary to the results of a study investigating stray cats from Ontario (15), but in agreement with studies from the United States investigating prevalence of hemoplasma in blood submitted from unknown cats to a diagnostic laboratory and from a feral cat population (2,16). There were no cats positive for both hemoplasmas. Cats infected with “Ca. Mycoplasma haemominutum” were at increased risk for retroviral (FIV or FeLV) infection. The same was true when hemoplasma positive cats were compared with the retroviral positive cats. This finding was consistent with previous reports suggesting that hemoplasma positive cats are at increased risk for concurrent retroviral infection (2,17,18).
Table 1.
FeLV | FIV | T. gondii | MHA | MHM | BAR | T. gondii oocyst | Fleas | Taenia sp. | T. cati | C. felis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive (%) | 3 (3.1) | 5 (5.2) | 28 (29.8) | 3 (3.1) | 8 (8.4) | 2 (2.1) | 1 (1.3) | 8 (9.6) | 12 (15) | 27 (34) | 11 (14) |
Negative | 93 | 91 | 66 | 92 | 87 | 93 | 77 | 87 | 66 | 51 | 67 |
N | 96 | 96 | 94 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 78 | 96 | 78 | 78 | 78 |
2* | 1* | 1* | 1* | 18* | 18* | 18* | 18* |
FeLV — Feline leukemia virus, FIV — Feline Immunodeficiency Virus, MHA — Mycoplasma haemofelis, MHM — Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum, BAR — Bartonella sp., T. cati — Toxocara cati, C. felis — Cystoisospora felis, *Information missing, N — Total number of cases investigated, T. gondii — IgG serology.
Gender played a significant role in hemoplasma infection, as all hemoplasma positive cats were males. This was statistically significant in spite of the study population being slightly biased towards males. This finding is in agreement with previous studies on cats with hemoplasma (2,16). These results cannot be easily explained as the precise mode of transmission of feline hemoplasmas has yet to be determined (19). Fleas, as vectors of transmission, have been suggested in the past; however, hemoplasmas have been found in cats living in areas with low flea prevalence (19). Also, when 6 naïve cats were exposed to hemoplasma-containing fleas, only 1 cat contracted the disease (19). In addition, none of the hemoplasma-positive cats in this study were positive for fleas at the time of sampling. One possible explanation is that male cats are more likely to engage in roaming and fighting behavior which may increase their chance of contracting the disease. This is especially true if a direct mode of transmission is possible.
Although close to 30% of the cats were positive for T. gondii on serology, only 1 cat was shedding T. gondii oocysts in the feces. This finding is in agreement with a previous study of environmental burden of T. gondii oocysts in cats’ feces, showing oocyst shedding in 0.9% of the cats (5). The high prevalence of positive T. gondii titers most likely indicated a latent infection or previous exposure and not necessarily clinical disease which is usually seen in retroviral-positive cats or those cats treated with immunosuppressive medications (6). This high prevalence is in agreement with previous prevalence studies from Grenada and California (20,21), but lower prevalence was seen in this study when compared to studies from North Carolina (22). Three cats positive for T. gondii antibodies were juvenile, raising a question of possible maternal antibody detection rather than exposure to the pathogen. Based on the findings of this study, feral cats did not seem to pose a great zoonotic risk for T. gondii. However, it must be emphasized that cats with latent infection can, in times of stress, start shedding the oocysts in the feces again (5,6). Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans can cause serious disease; therefore, the zoonotic potential of any feral cat should not be underestimated. In addition, cats seem to pose a considerable zoonotic risk with respect to the shedding of other intestinal parasites in their feces. Most of the fecal samples showed evidence of at least 1 intestinal parasite, while many samples contained evidence of multiple intestinal parasites.
Bartonella spp. (B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae) had a much lower prevalence in this population of cats compared with previously reported prevalence rates (16,20–23). This discrepancy in the findings may be due to the different study populations, the confined space of Prince Edward Island, and its harsh winter climate. Most studies that reported higher prevalence of Bartonella spp. came from tropical or much warmer climates (16,20,21,23). None of the Bartonella spp. positive cats were positive for other investigated pathogens. These results may suggest that Bartonella spp. are not associated with any other feline infectious pathogens investigated in this study, but the small number of positive cats precludes any definitive conclusion. Fleas, one of the vectors of this pathogen, were found in 9.6% of cats but the cats positive for Bartonella spp. did not have a concurrent flea infestation. This suggests that Bartonella spp. positive cats potentially had fleas sometime in the past or that they were exposed to Bartonella spp. via other means. A larger study population is required to determine the possible correlation between flea infestation and Bartonella spp. infection, due to the low prevalence of the pathogen in this feral cat population on Prince Edward Island.
The estimated age of the cats did not correlate with the prevalence of the infectious diseases. This finding is most likely influenced by the small sample size. The prevalence of retroviral infection was 7.3%, with only 1 cat being positive for both FIV and FeLV. This study showed a decline in the prevalence of retrovirus-positive feral cats when compared with the previously reported retrovirus prevalence in feral cats (12.4%) on Prince Edward Island (24).
Gender did not correlate with the prevalence of retroviral and T. gondii infections. The relatively low prevalence of retroviruses in this feral cat population, and a relatively small number of investigated cats most likely underpowered the study with respect to the gender differences for these pathogens.
The results of this study are in agreement with those of most previous studies investigating infections diseases in cats (2,5,15,18). In addition, we found a low prevalence of Bartonella spp. and a higher prevalence of “Ca. Mycoplasma haemominutum” than of M. haemofelis. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown as feral cats rather than owned cats were investigated. More focused studies, investigating larger number of cats, and determining the clinical and hematological status of each cat would be needed to determine the significance of these pathogens. Analysis of fleas for the presence of Bartonella spp. and hemoplasmas would determine their importance as vectors of these infections. Since a direct mode of hemoplasma transmission may be possible, analyzing other body fluids such as saliva may shed more light on the mode of transmission of these pathogens.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Companion Animal Trust Fund, Atlantic Veterinary College, for providing financial support for this project. We are grateful to Dr. Raphael Vanderstichel for providing valuable statistical support. CVJ
Footnotes
Use of this article is limited to a single copy for personal study. Anyone interested in obtaining reprints should contact the CVMA office (hbroughton@cvma-acmv.org) for additional copies or permission to use this material elsewhere.
References
- 1.Messick JB. Hemotrophic mycoplasmas (hemoplasmas): A review and new insights into pathogenic potential. Vet Clin Pathol. 2004;33:2–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2004.tb00342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sykes JE, Terry JC, Lindsay L, Owens SD. Prevalences of various hemoplasma species among cats in the United States with possible hemoplasmosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:372–379. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.3.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.George JW, Rideout B, Griffey SM, Pedersen NC. Effect of preexisting FeLV infection or FeLV and feline immunodeficiency virus coinfection on pathogenicity of the small variant of Haemobartonella felis in cats. Am J Vet Res. 2002;63:1172–1178. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Willi B, Boretti FS, Cattori V, et al. Identification, molecular characterization, and experimental transmission of a new hemoplasma isolate from a cat with hemolytic anemia in Switzerland. J Clin Micro. 2005;43:2581–2585. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2581-2585.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dabritz HA, Miller MA, Atwill ER, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii-like oocysts in cat feces and estimates of the environmental oocysts burden. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231:1676–1684. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.11.1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Green EC. Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2006. pp. 754–775. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chomel BB, Boulouis HJ, Petersen H, et al. Prevalence of Bartonella infection in domestic cats in Denmark. Vet Res. 2002;33:205–213. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2002008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boulouis HJ, Chang C, Henn JB, Kasten RW, Chomel BB. Factors associated with the rapid emergence of zoonotic Bartonella infections. Vet Res. 2005;36:383–410. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brunt J, Guptill L, Kordick DL, Kudrak S, Lappin MR. American Association of Feline Practitioners 2006 panel report on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Bartonella spp. infections. J Feline Med Surg. 2006;8:213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Breitschwerdt EB. Feline bartonellosis and cat scratch disease. Vet Immun and Immunopathol. 2008;123:167–171. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chomel BB, Boulouis HJ, Breitschwerdt EB. Cat scratch disease and other zoonotic Bartonella infections. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004;224:1270–1279. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.224.1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Levy JK, Scott HM, Lachtara JL, Crawford PC. Seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection among cats in North America and risk factors for seropositivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;3:371–376. doi: 10.2460/javma.228.3.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gray JJ, Balfour AH, Wreghitt TG. Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for detection of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii. Serodiag Immunother Infect Dis. 1990;4:335–340. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dabritz HA, Miller MA, Atwill ER, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii-like oocysts in cat feces and estimates of the environmental oocyst burden. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231:1676–1684. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.11.1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kamrani A, Parreira RV, Greenwood J, Prescott JF. The prevalence of Bartonella, hemoplasma, and Rickettsia felis infections in domestic cats and in cat fleas in Ontario. Can J Vet Res. 2008;72:411–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Luria JB, Levy JK, Lappin MR, et al. Prevalence of infectious diseases in feral cats in Northern Florida. J Feline Med Surg. 2004;6:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2003.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harrus S, Klement E, Aroch I, et al. Retrospective study of 46 cases of feline haemobartonellosis in Israel and their relationships with FeLV and FIV infections. Vet Rec. 2002;151:82–85. doi: 10.1136/vr.151.3.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sykes JE. Feline hemotropic mycoplasmas. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2010;1:62–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Woods JE, Brewer MM, Hawley JR, Wisnewski N, Lappin MR. Evaluation of Experimental transmission of Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum and Mycoplasma haemofelis by Ctenocephalides felis to cats. Am J Vet Res. 2005;66:1008–1012. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dubey JP, Lappin MR, Kwok OC, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and concurrent Bartonella spp., feline immunodeficiency virus, and feline leukemia virus infections in cats from Grenada, West Indies. J Parasitol. 2009;5:1129–1133. doi: 10.1645/GE-2114.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Case JB, Chomel B, Nicholson W, Foley JE. Serological survey of vector-borne zoonotic pathogens in pet cats and cats from animal shelters and feral colonies. J Feline Med Surg. 2006;2:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nutter FB, Dubey JP, Levine JF, et al. Seroprevalences of antibodies against Bartonella henselae and Toxoplasma gondii and fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia spp, and Toxocara cati in feral and pet domestic cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004;9:1394–1398. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guptill L, Wu CC, HogenEsch H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and genetic diversity of Bartonela henselae infections in pet cats in four regions of the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:652–659. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.652-659.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gibson KL, Keizer K, Golding C. A trap, neuter, and release program for feral cats on Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J. 2002;43:695–698. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]