Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2011 Aug 17;6(8):e23594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023594

Interactions with M Cells and Macrophages as Key Steps in the Pathogenesis of Enterohemorragic Escherichia coli Infections

Lucie Etienne-Mesmin 1,2,3,4, Benoit Chassaing 1,2, Pierre Sauvanet 1,2,5, Jérémy Denizot 1,2, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot 3,4, Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud 1,2, Nathalie Pradel 1,2,¤, Valérie Livrelli 1,2,4,6,*
Editor: Dipshikha Chakravortty7
PMCID: PMC3157389  PMID: 21858177

Abstract

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) are food-borne pathogens that can cause serious infections ranging from diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). Translocation of Shiga-toxins (Stx) from the gut lumen to underlying tissues is a decisive step in the development of the infection, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Many bacterial pathogens target the follicle-associated epithelium, which overlies Peyer's patches (PPs), cross the intestinal barrier through M cells and are captured by mucosal macrophages. Here, translocation across M cells, as well as survival and proliferation of EHEC strains within THP-1 macrophages were investigated using EHEC O157:H7 reference strains, isogenic mutants, and 15 EHEC strains isolated from HC/HUS patients. We showed for the first time that E. coli O157:H7 strains are able to interact in vivo with murine PPs, to translocate ex vivo through murine ileal mucosa with PPs and across an in vitro human M cell model. EHEC strains are also able to survive and to produce Stx in macrophages, which induce cell apoptosis and Stx release. In conclusion, our results suggest that the uptake of EHEC by M cells and underlying macrophages in the PP may be a critical step in Stx translocation and release in vivo. A new model for EHEC infection in humans is proposed that could help in a fuller understanding of EHEC-associated diseases.

Introduction

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), a subset of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), have been associated with human diseases, ranging from uncomplicated diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). A recent major outbreak in Germany, with thousands cases of foodborne illness (and approximately 25% of them progressing to HUS) has shed light on EHEC [1], [2]. The gastrointestinal tract of cattle and other ruminants appears to be the main reservoir of STEC strains [3], [4]. Several studies have reported a high prevalence of STEC belonging to a wide range of serotypes in animals and food products [3], [4], [5]. However, only a limited number of serotypes have been associated with human disease, among which O157:H7 is predominant [3], [6]. The association of serotypes with disease of varying severity in humans and with outbreaks or sporadic disease has led to the proposal that STEC be classified into 5 seropathotypes, from A (most virulent) to E (serotypes that have not been involved in disease in humans) [7].

EHEC colonize the digestive tract of humans and produce Shiga toxins (Stx1 and/or Stx2), also known as Verotoxins, which are essential for virulence. Epidemiological studies, together with in vitro and in vivo experiments, have shown that Stx2 is the most common virulence factor associated with severe human disease [3]. Stx are composed of an enzymatically active A subunit and a pentameric B subunit. The B subunits form a doughnut-shaped structure with a central pore and bind to the glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3, also known as CD77), which is expressed at the surface of endothelial cells, leading to subsequent internalization of the toxin [8]. The A subunit is able to inhibit elongation of the peptide chain during protein synthesis, resulting in eukaryotic cell death, tissue damage and organ failure [3], [8]. EHEC, together with enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) bacterial pathogens. They induce histopathological lesions characterized by localized effacement of the brush border microvilli and intimate attachment of the bacteria to the apical membrane of epithelial cells, through the formation of cytoskeletal actin pedestals [9], [10]. All the genes involved in A/E lesions map to a pathogenicity island, the Locus for Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) that encodes a type III secretion system (TTSS) involved in the injection of several proteins and effectors [11]. The first gene associated with A/E lesions is the eae gene encoding intimin, an outer membrane protein. Intimin binding to Tir, a receptor translocated from the bacteria to the host cell, mediates intimate adherence of the bacterium to epithelial cells. Several intimin types have been identified that may determine the host tropism [12]. Many other factors have been suggested to be associated with EHEC virulence. These include enterohemolysin, a pore-forming cytolysin, an extracellular serine-protease, and a catalase-peroxidase [3], [13]. Flagella are also thought to play a role in adherence to epithelial cells. H7 flagella have been shown to act as an adhesin to bovine intestinal epithelium [14] and H7 flagellin (encoded by the fliC gene) induced proinflammatory signals in human colon epithelial cells through activation of the MAP kinase and NF-κB pathways [15].

Experiments using in vitro organ culture (IVOC) of human intestinal mucosa revealed a preferential tropism of EHEC O157:H7 for the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) overlying the distal ileal Peyer's patches (PPs), where it causes A/E lesions [12], [16], [17]. The FAE is characterized by the presence of specialized “membranous” or “microfold” cells (M cells), which are specialized in the translocation of microorganisms and antigens from the intestinal lumen to the basolateral side of the epithelium, where they are delivered to the underlying macrophages [18], [19]. While M cells are primarly involved in sampling intestinal antigens, many invasive Enterobacteriaceae, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [20], rabbit enteroadherent E. coli [21] or Adherent-Invasive E. coli (AIEC) isolated from patients with Crohn's disease [22], [23], take advantage of the transcytotic characteristics of M cells to use them as an entry site to translocate across the intestinal barrier.

Systemic complications associated with EHEC diseases such as HUS require the expression and translocation of Stx, which are produced by colonizing bacteria, from the gut lumen to underlying tissues and the bloodstream. However, the mechanism of Stx translocation across the epithelial barrier remains unclear as human intestinal cells lack Gb3, the Stx receptor. Since EHEC O157:H7 was found to interact initially with FAE in both humans and cattle [12], [16], [24], we hypothesized that the uptake of bacteria by M cells and underlying macrophages may be the first stage in Stx translocation, and may represent an important step in the pathogenesis of EHEC infections. We report here the interactions of EHEC strains in vivo and ex vivo with murine PPs, and in vitro using a human M cell model. Binding to the FAE and translocation through M cells may result in the rapid contact of bacteria with underlying human macrophages. However, little information is known about the interactions between EHEC strains and these cells. We decided, therefore, to investigate entry, survival and proliferation of EHEC strains belonging to seropathotypes A to C in human THP-1 macrophages. EHEC were found to survive and to produce Stx within macrophages, leading to host cell apoptosis and Stx release.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are given in Table 1 . The green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing strains were obtained by electroporation of a high-copy plasmid pFPV25.1. Before use, each strain was streaked onto LB agar plates (BD Bioscience, USA) and grown overnight at 37°C in LB broth, unless otherwise stated. When necessary, kanamycin or ampicillin was added to the medium at 50 µg/ml. For ex vivo experiments, a non pathogenic E. coli strain MG1655 (RifR) was used and plated on LB medium containing rifampicin (300 µg/ml).

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmid used in this study.

Strains or plasmids Serotype Seropathotype Characteristics stx genotype Source or reference
Strains
86-24 WT O157:H7 A Enterohemorragic E. coli O157:H7 reference strain stx1− stx2+ [44]
86-24 Δstx2 O157:H7 NA 86-24 isogenic mutant with stx2 gene deleted stx1− stx2− [15]
86-24 Δeae O157:H7 NA 86-24 isogenic mutant with eae gene deleted stx1− stx2+ [15]
86-24 ΔfliC O157:H7 NA 86-24 isogenic mutant with fliC gene deleted stx1− stx2+ [15]
EDL933 O157:H7 A Enterohemorragic E. coli O157:H7 reference strain stx1+ stx2+ ATCC 43895
CHVi-1 O157:H7 A E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH1898 O157:H7 A E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH075 O157:H7 A E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH087 O103:H2 B E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1+ stx2− [13]
CH089 O103:H2 B E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HC stx1+ stx2− [13]
NV-10 O26:H11 B E. coli isolated from a clinical case with diarrhea stx1+ stx2− [4]
CH071 O157:H26 C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH013 O91:H10 C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH085 O91:H10 C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH014 O91:H21 C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
VTH13 O91:H21 C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HC stx1+ stx2+ Blanco Ja
CH016 O174:H− C E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH123 O5:H− ND E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HC stx1+ stx2− [13]
CH017 O+:H− ND E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
CH023 O+:H− ND E. coli isolated from a clinical case with HUS stx1− stx2+ [13]
LF82 O83:H1 NA Adherent-Invasive E. coli isolated from a patient with Crohn's disease NA [45]
MG1655 OR:H48/K− NA Non pathogenic E. coli NA Laboratory stock
C600 K-12 NA Non pathogenic E. coli NA Laboratory stock
Plasmid
pFPV25.1 Plasmid constitutively expressing GFP [46]

NA, not applicable; ND, not determined; HUS, Hemolytic-uremic syndrome; HC, Hemorrhagic colitis; WT, wild-type.

a

Laboratorio de Referencia de E. coli, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.

Ethics statement

Animal protocols were approved by the committee for ethical issues, CEMEA Auvergne (Agreement to Nicolas Barnich, CEMEA CE16-09, Clermont-Ferrand, France). Mice were killed by cervical dislocation according to animal care procedure.

Ex vivo interactions with murine Peyer's patches

Eight- to ten-week old FVB/N wild-type male mice were bread and reared in the animal care facility at the Université d'Auvergne (Clermont-Ferrand, France) under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions.

Biopsies from ileum with or without PP were immediately removed from mouse intestine and used for Ussing chamber experiments. Briefly, 1 cm of ileal samples was opened along the mesenteric border, splatted and mounted in an Ussing chamber with an opening area of 0.96 mm2. Tissues were bathed in 37°C-oxygenated Ringer solution for 5 h. A total of 1.6 ml of 1×107 CFU/ml (colony forming units) of EHEC or non pathogenic E. coli was added to the mucosal compartment and 1.6 ml of Ringer buffer was placed into the serosal side. To quantify the bacteria translocated across mucosa, medium from the serosal compartment was collected every hour, diluted, and plated onto LB agar plates. The integrity of ileal mucosa was monitored throughout Ussing chamber experiments using Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). FITC diffusion was assessed by fluorescence measurement in a microplate fluorescent reader (Fluoroskan Ascent FL, Thermo) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 522 nm.

Mice ileal loop assay

Interactions of EHEC bacteria with PPs were studied using mouse ileal loops, as previously described by Hitotsubashi et al. [25]. FVB/N wild-type male mice were starved for 24 h before operation but provided with water ad libitum. The animals were anesthetized and their intestine exteriorized through a midline incision. Two or three intestinal segments (about 1 cm), each containing one PP, were ligated, and 5×108 CFU of bacteria (EHEC 86-24 WT and 86-24 Δstx2, a non-pathogenic E. coli strain K-12 C600, and a control AIEC strain LF82) were injected into the ileal loop. Two hours after injection, the animals were killed and the loops were excised. To find a colocalization of 86-24 WT bacteria with M cells, 4 µm sections of paraffin-embedded PPs were stained with Tetramethyl Rhodamine Isocyanate (TRITC)-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA 1, Sigma-Aldrich, France) to label M cells. Hoechst was used for nuclear staining and a monoclonal mouse antibody raised against E. coli LPS O157 (Abcam, France) was used to label EHEC bacteria. The slides were then analyzed with a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope.

Cell lines and cell culture

The in vitro M cell co-culture model was first developped by Kerneis et al. and later adapted by Gullberg et al. [26], [27]. The human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell-line Caco-2 clone 1 [27] was grown in complete DMEM (PAA, Austria), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Lonza, Switzerland), 4 mM L-glutamine (PAA), 100 U/ml penicillin (PAA) and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (PAA). The human Burkitt's lymphoma cell-line Raji B (ECACC 85011429) was grown in complete RPMI-1640 medium (PAA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 8 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.

The human (macrophage-like) monocyte cell line THP-1 (ATCC TIB202) was maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 4 mM L-glutamine. THP-1 cells were activated using 20 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich), seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates (BD Falcon, USA) at a density of 5×105 cells per cm2, and grown for 18 h.

Vero cells (African green monkey kidney cells, ATCC CRL 1587) were grown at 37°C in Eagle basal medium (Seromed, Germany) supplemented with 10% FBS, 8 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin,100 µg/ml streptomycin and 1% vitamin solution, and seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates at a density of 106 cells per ml.

All the cell lines were grown at 37°C under 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

Vero toxin assay

To quantify Stx production, bacterial culture supernatants and infected THP-1 supernatants were tested for cytotoxicity in the Vero cell assay, as previously described [4]. THP-1 cells were infected for 2 h, extra-cellular bacteria were removed and fresh medium was added for 3 h, before testing Stx in supernatants. The Stx titre was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest filtrate dilution that caused 50% cell detachment after 24 h of incubation, as judged by the dye intensity and by microscopic observation (the breakpoint for a positive result was a titer of 4). Known concentrations of purified Stx2 (Toxin Technology, USA) were used to estimate the range of Stx2 release within macrophages. Each experiment was performed at least 3 times.

Bacterial translocation across M cells

A total of 1×106 Caco-2-cl1 cells per ml were seeded onto the apical aspect of Transwell™ filters (Millipore Ltd, UK) previously coated with BD Matrigel™ (USA). Cells were carefully cultured for 17 days until they reached a fully differentiated phenotype. 5×105 Raji-B cells were added to the basolateral compartment of Caco-2 monolayers and co-culture was maintained for 4–6 days. Monocultures of Caco-2 cells on matched filter supports were used as control.

For translocation assay, apical surface of M-cells were infected with 1×107 bacteria per transwell. Samples from basolateral media were collected every hour for 5 h, and 10-fold dilutions were plated onto LB agar. The integrity of cell monolayers was tested by monitoring trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) with a Millicell®-ERS (Millipore).

Bacterial uptake, survival and replication in human macrophages

Bacterial uptake, survival and replication were measured by the gentamicin protection assay. Bacterial strains were grown for 2 h at 37°C in LB. Before infection, cell monolayers were washed twice with PBS and the medium was replaced with 1 ml of RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS for 2 h. THP-1 cells were infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 bacteria per macrophage. After a 2-h incubation, infected macrophages were washed twice with PBS, and fresh cell culture medium containing 20 µg/ml of gentamicin was added to kill extracellular bacteria. After incubation for 1, 4, 24 or 48 h, the medium was removed, cells were washed once with PBS, and a 5 min treatment with 500 µl 1X-triton was used to lyse the eukaryotic cells. This concentration of Triton X-100 had no effect on bacterial viability for at least 30 min. Samples were collected, diluted, and plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates to determine the number of bacteria surviving gentamicin killing assay. Survival was expressed either as CFU/well or as the mean percentage of the number of bacteria recovered at 4, 24 and 48 h post-infection, compared to that at 1 h post-infection, defined as 100%. Each experiment was performed at least five times.

Lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH)

Supernatants of infected macrophages were sampled at 1, 4, 8 and 24 h of gentamicin treatment, and assayed for LDH activity using reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) as a substrate (LDH kit, Boehringer Mannheim, France).

Hoechst Staining of THP-1 macrophages

Coverslips with adherent infected THP-1 cells were collected at specified time points, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed twice with PBS, and stained with Hoechst (5 mg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature. Coverslips were washed three times with saponin, twice with PBS, and mounted on glass slides. Apoptotic nuclei were quantified by fluorescence microscopy. Each experiment was performed four times. Five random fields were counted on each slide.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Cross sections of THP-1 cells were prepared as follows. After infection, cells were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer at 4°C for 2 h and post fixed in 1% OsO4 in cacodylate buffer at 4°C for 1 h. After dehydratation in ethanol, cultures were embedded in a 2-mm-thick Epon coating and polymerized for 3 days at 60°C. Suitable areas were oriented parallel to the cell layer surface on Epon blocks with an Epon mixture. Ultrathin sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were examined with Hitachi H7650 TEM.

Confocal microscopy of infected THP-1 macrophages

After infection with GFP-expressing bacteria, as described above, THP-1 cells were washed with PBS to eliminate extracellular bacteria and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Fixed-cells were washed with PBS, incubated for 5 min with 0.1 M glycine, washed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 20 min. After PBS-washing, slides were incubated twice for 10 min, each time with PBS–0.2% gelatin. Actin cytoskeleton was stained for 15 min using TRITC-phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich, France). Monolayers were then washed with PBS and distilled water, stained with 49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted on glass slides with a Mowiol solution (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany). The slides were examined with a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope.

Statistical analysis

The Student t-test was used for unpaired data with a 5% level of significance for the comparison of values. For Ussing chamber experiments, comparisons were made with the unpaired Mann Whitney test.

Results

EHEC strains interact ex vivo with murine Peyer's patches and in vivo with murine M cells

EHEC mucosal translocation across murine ileal mucosa was studied in Ussing chambers. Transmucosal uptake of EHEC 86-24 WT bacteria through murine ileal mucosa without PP was very low, even after 5 h of infection (Figure 1A). In contrast, bacterial translocation was observed for ileal biopsies containing PP, reaching a median number of translocating bacteria of 1.1×105 CFU/mm2 at 5 h, versus no translocating bacteria for 6 out of 7 ileal mucosa without PP (P<0.05) (Figure 1A). As a control, a non pathogenic E. coli strain was not able to translocate across ileal mucosa either with or without PP (Figure 1B). The integrity of ileal mucosa was monitored throughout Ussing chamber experiments: FITC diffusion was limited and there was no difference between Stx-producing bacteria and non pathogenic E. coli (Figure S1). To confirm ex vivo data, in vivo experiments using mouse ileal loop containing one PP were performed. Interestingly, bloodshot PPs were observed macroscopically in ileal mucosa after a two-hour contact with wild type EHEC. This was not the case with a Stx-negative E. coli strain 86-24 Δstx2, nor with the AIEC strain LF82, an invasive E. coli pathovar known to target PPs, nor with a non pathogenic E. coli strain K-12 C600 (Figure 1C). Confocal analysis revealed that 86-24 WT EHEC bacteria interact with murine M cells (Figure 1D).

Figure 1. Ex vivo transmucosal uptake of EHEC bacteria by murine Peyer's patches, and in vivo interactions with murine M cells in ileal loop assays.

Figure 1

(A) Ex vivo interaction of E. coli O157:H7 (strain 86-24 WT) with murine mucosa isolated from the ileum with (n = 10) or without (n = 7) Peyer's patches (PPs) in Ussing chambers. Each point represents the number of translocated bacteria (CFU/mm2) for one experiment at the time of infection (0 h) and after 3 h, 4 h and 5 h of contact. Lines represent the median values of the group. Comparisons were made with the Mann-Whitney test. *, Ileum with PP significantly different from ileal mucosa (P<0.05). (B) Ex vivo interaction of non pathogenic E. coli MG1655 with murine ileal mucosa isolated from the ileum with (n = 5) or without (n = 6) PPs in Ussing chambers. Each point represents the number of translocated bacteria (CFU/mm2) for one experiment at the time of infection (0 h) and after 3 h, 4 h and 5 h of contact. (C) Macroscopic analysis of murine PP sections after a two-hour contact with EHEC 86-24 WT, 86-24 Δstx2, AIEC strain LF82 and non pathogenic E. coli K-12 strain C600 in ileal loop assays. Dashed circles indicate PP. Scale bar = 1 mm. (D) Confocal analysis of murine PP sections after labeling of EHEC 86-24 WT with anti LPS O157 antibody (green), of M cell with UEA-1 TRITC (red) and DNA with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Arrowheads, bacteria associated with UEA-1-positive cells.

EHEC strains are able to translocate across M cells

Since 86-24 WT EHEC interact in vivo with murine M cells, we used an in vitro model in which human intestinal epithelial cells acquire M cell-like characteristics after being co-cultured with Raji B cells to study bacterial translocation. Experiments were first performed using an E. coli 86-24 Δstx2 mutant to avoid possible cell death induced by Stx. Translocation of E. coli 86-24 Δstx2 remained at low levels with the control Caco-2 monolayer [27] (4.6×106±1×106 CFU/ml), but increased with time in the in vitro M cell model, reaching 5.1×107±1.7×107 CFU/ml at 5 h post infection (P<0.01) (Figure 2A). The behavior of 86-24 WT and 86-24 Δeae mutant was then analyzed and was similar to that of 86-24 Δstx2 (Figure 2B), indicating that (i) Stx does not interfere with the co-culture model and (ii) intimin (product of the eae gene) is not directly involved in translocation in this model. An additional O157:H7 reference strain (EDL933) and a non-O157 EHEC of serotype O103:H2 (CH087) were also able to translocate across M cells (Figure 2C), supporting the hypothesis that this mechanism could be extended to all EHEC strains. In contrast, the non pathogenic E. coli strain K-12 C600 was not able to translocate at levels similar to that of EHEC strains, since only 7.4×104 CFU/ml were recovered after a 5 h contact with M cells. The translocation of EHEC bacteria was not the result of a loss of the monolayer integrity, since TEER stayed constant during the 5 h of infection (Figure S2).

Figure 2. In vitro translocation of EHEC strains across human M cell monolayers.

Figure 2

The number of translocated bacteria (CFU/ml) at 1 to 5 h post infection was determined in M cell monolayers versus control Caco-2 monolayers, for EHEC 86-24 Δstx2 (O157:H7) (A) and compared with 86-24 WT and 86-24 Δeae (B) and with EDL 933 (O157:H7) and CH087 (O103:H2) (C). Results are means ± standard error of mean (SEM) for replicate experiments. Translocation through M cell monolayers significantly different from that of Caco-2 monolayers (* P<0.05 or ** P<0.01).

EHEC strains can replicate within THP-1 macrophages

The study was performed with 15 EHEC strains isolated from HC/HUS patients and two O157:H7 reference strains (86-24 WT and EDL933). Bacterial uptake, survival and replication in THP-1 cells were measured by the gentamicin protection assay. The non pathogenic E. coli strain K-12 C600 was used as a negative control and AIEC strain LF82 (isolated from a patient with Crohn's disease and able to highly replicate within macrophages) as a positive control [28], [29]. The number of intracellular bacteria was determined 1 h, 24 h and 48 h post-infection in the presence of gentamicin. The ability of EHEC strains to enter macrophages varied widely from one strain to another. The amount of intracellular bacteria at 1 h post-infection ranged from 1.7×104 CFU/well for CH016, to 5.8×105 CFU/well for CH015 (data not shown). The ability to enter macrophages was not related to serotype or belonging to a seropathotype.

Survival or replication of EHEC strains at 24 h post-infection was expressed as a percentage compared to the number of bacteria at 1 h, defined as 100%. The nonpathogenic E. coli K-12 C600 control strain was slowly but efficiently killed following phagocytosis by THP-1 cells: only 7% of the bacteria initially internalized were recovered at 24 h post-infection, evidence of the bactericidal activity of the THP-1 macrophages (Figure 3). All EHEC strains were able to survive within macrophages after 24 h. Compared to those of the negative control (E. coli K-12 C600), the percentages of survival were higher, ranging from 23% for CHVi-1 to 155% for CH071. However, in contrast with what was observed for the positive control (AIEC strain LF82), the number of intracellular bacteria at 24 h post-infection was smaller than at 1 h post-infection (less than 100%) in all but two strains (CH013 and CH071). No link was found between the ability of strains to survive/replicate and their serotype. After investigating the ability of strains to express Stx, we observed that the strains able to replicate within macrophages no longer expressed Stx (Stx titers<4, see Figure 3).

Figure 3. Survival and replication of EHEC strains within human THP-1 macrophages at 24 h post-infection.

Figure 3

Results are expressed as the number of intracellular bacteria at 24 h relative to that obtained at 1 h after gentamicin exposure, taken as 100%. A, seropathotype A; B, seropathotype B; C, seropathotype C; ND, seropathotype not determined. All assays were performed independently at least five times. Results are means ± Standard Deviation (SD) for the replicate experiments.

To confirm that Stx play a role in the ability of EHEC strains to survive and/or replicate within macrophages, stx isogenic mutants of the O157:H7 reference strains 86-24 WT and EDL933 were used. For 86-24 WT, the number of bacteria internalized after 1 h, defined as 100%, was 2.1×105 CFU/well (Figure 4A), and the survival rate was 51%, indicating that the level of intracellular bacteria was two-fold lower after 24 h than after 1 h (Figure 4B). The entry of the 86-24 Δstx 2 mutant was slightly less than that of the wild type (81%, Figure 4A), but the percentage of survival was 186% (Figure 4B), indicating that the number of intracellular bacteria had almost doubled compared to time 1 h. The behavior of the isogenic Δeae mutant did not differ from that of the 86-24 WT strain. Interestingly, the percentage of survival at 48 h post-infection was low for all the strains tested, around 5% for Stx-producing strains and 35% for Δstx 2 mutants and non-Stx-producing bacteria. Identical results were obtained with EDL933 and its isogenic Δstx and Δeae mutants (data not shown).

Figure 4. Entry and survival of EHEC strains within THP-1 macrophages.

Figure 4

Percentage of intracellular bacteria at 1 h relative to 86-24 WT taken as 100% (A), and percentage of intracellular bacteria at 24 h/1 h and 48 h/1 h post-infection (B) for EHEC 86-24 WT, and 86-24 Δstx2, 86-24 Δeae, and 86-24 ΔfliC isogenic mutants. All assays were performed independently at least four times. Results are means ± SD for the replicate experiments. Panel A) * 86-24 ΔfliC significantly different from 86-24 WT (P<0.05). Panel B) * 86-24 Δstx2 significantly different from 86-24 WT at 24 h post-infection (P<0.05).

Cytotoxic effects of EHEC infection on THP-1 macrophages

To check if EHEC were able to produce Stx within macrophages, supernatants of infected THP-1 cells were tested using a Vero toxin assay. High amounts of Stx were recovered from THP-1 macrophages infected with EHEC 86-24 WT and EDL933: the cytotoxic titer was 1/256 (1/28) and the average amount of toxin was estimated to be 8.2±1.8 ng/ml. As expected, no cytotoxic effect was observed in the supernatants of THP-1 infected with a non pathogenic E. coli strain or the 86-24 Δstx2 mutant (Table 2).

Table 2. Quantification of Stx released after THP-1 infections.

Strains Cytotoxic titera Stx concentrationb (ng/ml)
86-24 WT 1/256 8.2±1.8
86-24 Δstx2 - 0
86-24 Δeae - 0
EDL933 1/256 8.2±1.8
K-12 C600 - 0
a

The verotoxin titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest sample dilution which caused 50% cell detachment after 24 h of incubation.

b

Stx concentration in the supernatant of infected THP-1 macrophages.

The results of 3 independent sets of data are presented.

-, no cytotoxic effect.

Culture supernatants of infected macrophages were assayed for the presence of the cytoplasmic LDH to estimate the membrane integrity of the cells and the cytotoxic effect of EHEC strains. The amounts of LDH released were expressed as LDH activity recovered in the supernatant relative to LDH activity of total cell lysis defined as 100%. Infection of THP-1 cells with wild type 86-24 EHEC strain resulted in high release of LDH, which reached 20% at 24 h post-infection (Figure 5A). In contrast, the amounts of LDH released from Δstx 2-infected macrophages were significantly lower than those of cells infected with the 86-24 WT strain (P<0.05). Since Stx have been shown to induce apoptosis in epithelial, endothelial and monocytic cells [30], [31], we decided to perform fluorescence microscopy analysis of THP-1 nucleus stained with Hoechst. Unlike the 86-24 Δstx 2 mutant, macrophages infected with 86-24 WT for 24 h had fragmented nuclei, characteristic of apoptotic cells (Figure 5B). Quantifications of apoptotic cells are shown in Figure 5C. After a 4-h to 24-h infection, 86-24 WT increased the percentage of apoptotic cells, compared with cells infected with the Δstx 2 mutant or non infected (NI) cells (P<0.05). At 24 h, the percentage of apoptotic cells reached 5% of the remaining cells, compared to 0.3% and 0.1% with the Δstx 2 mutant and non infected cells, respectively (P<0.05).

Figure 5. Induction of apoptosis in THP-1 macrophages infected by EHEC strains.

Figure 5

Percentage of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity at 1 h, 4 h, and 24 h post-infection (A). Fluorescence microscopy analysis of 86-24 WT and 86-24 Δstx2 infected THP-1 macrophages stained with Hoechst at 24 h post-infection. Arrowheads indicate the fragmented nuclei of apoptotic cells (B). Quantification of apoptosis in infected THP-1 stained with Hoechst (C). Results are expressed as percentage of apoptotic cells numbered by microscopy observation. Results are mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. NI, non infected. Panel A) * 86-24 Δstx2 significantly different from 86-24 WT at 24 h (P<0.05). Panel C) 86-24 Δstx2 and NI significantly different from 86-24 WT at 4 h and 24 h (*) (P<0.05).

Morphological data to confirm the cytotoxic effects and survival of EHEC wild type strain and the Δstx 2 mutant within THP-1 cells were obtained with confocal microscopy and TEM. One hour after infection, whatever the strain, many macrophages were infected with only a few bacteria present in small vacuoles (Figure 6A and C). At 24 h post-infection with 86-24 WT, cell layers were damaged and very few bacteria were found within macrophages (Figure 6D), suggesting that Stx production had driven the cells to apoptosis and release of intracellular bacteria into the antibiotic containing media. In contrast, THP-1 macrophages infected with the 86-24 Δstx2 mutant contained many bacterial clusters (Figure 6B and E), indicating that non-Stx-producing bacteria were able to replicate within macrophages; no morphological evidence of cytotoxicity was observed, confirming LDH release results.

Figure 6. Survival and cytotoxic effects of EHEC strains within THP-1 macrophages.

Figure 6

Confocal microscopy (A and B) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (C, D, and E) analysis of THP-1 macrophages infected with EHEC strains. THP-1 macrophages were infected with the 86-24 WT strain (A, C and D) and with the 86-24 Δstx2 isogenic mutant (B and E) at 1 h post-infection (A and C) and at 24 h post-infection (B, D and E). For confocal micrographs, THP-1 macrophages were infected with GFP-positive 86-24 WT and 86-24 Δstx2 isogenic mutant (green color). The actin cytoskeleton of cells was stained with TRITC phalloidin (red), and DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Arrowheads indicate bacteria within THP-1 macrophages. Scale bar = 10 µm (A and B). Scale bar = 1 µm (C, D and E).

Discussion

EHEC O157:H7 are one of the most common pathogens involved in large outbreaks of severe gastrointestinal illnesses around the world [2], [6]. EHEC are implicated in a wide spectrum of clinical outcomes ranging from nonbloody diarrhea to HC and HUS. Stx, one of the major virulence factors produced by EHEC, plays an important role in the development of complications such as HUS [3]. To cause human illness, orally ingested EHEC must survive the acidic environment of the stomach [3]. However, recent studies evaluating the survival of an E. coli O157:H7 strain in a simulated in vitro model of human digestive tract, revealed a bacterial mortality in the stomach and duodenum. A bacterial growth was observed in the distal parts of the small intestine, suggesting that high levels of bacteria could be present in the ileum and in the colon [32]. EHEC are thought to colonize the colonic mucosa but do not invade deeper layers of the mucosa or spread systemically. Studies conducted using human intestinal IVOC have revealed a preferential tropism of EHEC for the FAE overlying ileal PPs, which is associated with a lack of colonic adhesion [12], [16], [17]. EHEC can induce A/E lesions on IVOC prepared from bovine ileum [16], but the principal site of colonization of EHEC O157:H7 is the lymphoid follicle-dense mucosa at the terminal rectum in the bovine host [24]. If EHEC target FAE, we hypothesized that the uptake of bacteria by M cells and underlying macrophages, which is observed for some pathogenic bacteria, may be the first step in EHEC translocation and subsequent toxin transport across the intestinal barrier.

It is now well documented that invasive members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, such as Salmonella, Shigella or AIEC, use M cells as the initial point of interaction with the host mucosa [18], [20], [22], [23], [33]. M cells transcytosis has been studied in vitro using a procedure to differentiate human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) into M cells by co-culture with Raji B lymphocytes. This model exhibits morphological and functional characteristics of M cells, such as loss of microvilli, downregulation of brush-border enzymes, upregulation of particle transport, and enhanced translocation of pathogens [26], [27]. Salmonella translocation across this co-culture model was greater than in Caco-2 control monolayers, while translocation of EPEC, Listeria monocytogenes or Clostridium difficile was not enhanced in M cells compared to Caco-2 [18], [34]. We show here for the first time that EHEC strains, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, are able to significantly translocate through M cell monolayers compared to Caco-2 monolayers. A non pathogenic E. coli strain was not able to translocate at levels similar to that of EHEC strains. The high level of EHEC translocation through M cells is not a result of the loss of monolayer integrity, since the transepithelial electrical resistance of M cell monolayers was not modified after infection neither with EHEC strains 86-24 WT and EDL 933, nor with a non pathogenic E. coli. The Ussing chamber system is also a useful model of ex vivo intact organ culture to study mechanisms of bacterial translocation and the pathogenesis of enteric infections. Transmucosal uptake of EHEC strain 86-24 WT was confirmed and we observed high levels of bacterial translocation through murine ileal mucosa containing PP, whereas very few bacteria crossed the ileal mucosa in the absence of PP. In vivo ileal loop assays confirmed a specific targeting of EHEC to FAE overlying PP regions. Taken together, our in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments demonstrate that EHEC strains target M cells on the surface of PPs in order to translocate across the epithelial barrier. Moreover, we describe for the first time that a two-hour contact with wild type EHEC induces hemorrhagic lesions in PPs in ileal loop assays, whereas such phenomenon is not found for AIEC strain LF82, an invasive E. coli pathovar known to target PPs [23]. A Stx-negative mutant is not able to induce bloodshot in ileal loop, which confirms the well known role of Stx in hemorrhagic lesions.

The molecular mechanisms that mediate the transport of bacteria across M cells remain unclear, and the bacterial effectors involved have not yet been totally identified. Intimin types might play a role in determining the pattern of colonisation and tissue tropism in the host, and intimin γ appears to restrict colonization of O157:H7 strains to human FAE [16]. Moreover, intimin γ binds β1-integrins, which are expressed on the apical surface of M cells [35]. Contrary to expectations, deletion of the eae gene in strain 86-24 did not alter translocation rates in our M cell model (Figure 2B) whereas the mutant was impaired in its capacity to adhere to epithelial intestinal cells (data not shown). Our results indicate that the LEE encoded genes may not promote translocation across M cells in EHEC. The long polar fimbriae (LPF), encoded by the lpf operon, play a key role in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [36] and in AIEC [23] to mediate bacterial interactions with M cells. The lpf operon was detected in an O91:H21 HUS associated strain, using a genomic subtractive hybridization procedure to identify virulence DNA sequences [37], and the complete genome sequence of O157:H7 strains revealed the presence of two lpf operons [38], [39]. Their expression is tightly regulated, and LPF were reported to be associated with adherence in EHEC O157:H7 to cultured epithelial cells [40]. However, deletion of one or both of the lpf operons in O157:H7 did not reduce FAE adhesion but enhanced colonization to small intestine, suggesting that LPF do not promote the targeting of PP in EHEC O157:H7 [41].

The enteric pathogens crossing the FAE are captured by resident macrophages and subepithelial dendritic cells in the dome of the lymphoid follicle [19]. In this study, we analyzed the entry, survival and proliferation of 17 EHEC strains and isogenic mutants in human THP-1 macrophages. We showed that EHEC were able to survive within macrophages for 24 h and to produce Stx, thereby inducing cell apoptosis of THP-1 macrophages and toxin release. Studies using human epithelial, endothelial and monocytic cell lines have shown that purified Stx induce apoptotic cell death in vitro [31]. The mechanism of Stx-induced apoptosis in the human myeloid leukaemia cell line THP-1 involves the increased expression of DR5 and TRAIL and activation of caspase-8 via a calpain-dependent mechanism through endoplasmic reticulum stress response [30], [31]. Furthermore, Stx encoding genes were seen to be up-regulated in intracellular bacteria [42].

Stx1 and Stx2 are able to cross polarized intestinal epithelial cells via a transcellular process and to remain biologically active after translocation, and it was shown that neutrophil transmigration enhanced the translocation of Stx, probably by opening a non-specific paracellular pathway across a polarized monolayer of T84 epithelial cells [43]. Here we propose an alternative pathway for Stx translocation via bacterial uptake by M cells and underlying macrophages. After bacterial uptake by M cells, Stx induce apoptosis in underlying infected macrophages, which leads to EHEC and toxin release in the lamina propria. In our experimental conditions, the average survival rate for the 86-24 wild type strain was only 51% because bacteria released into the antibiotic containing media were killed. In contrast in vivo, EHEC strains could be released in the lamina propria. We found that EHEC were able to replicate within THP-1 macrophages after 24 h but were killed after 48 h, unlike AIEC LF82 strain, which was still able to replicate within macrophages [28], [29]. More and more bacterial pathogens are observed to be able to translocate across the FAE via M cells, but their fate varies greatly depending on the pathogen. Salmonella, which are able to survive within macrophage, can spread throughout the organism, leading to bacteraemia and to systemic diseases. In contrast, infections due to Shigella or AIEC are restricted to the digestive tract. In vivo, EHEC could be eventually killed and therefore would not invade deeper layers of the mucosa, but the toxins released could gain access to the systemic circulation. The amount of toxin that translocates across intestinal epithelia is probably one of the most important factors in determining the development of systemic complications.

As observed with Shigella, the infectious dose for E. coli O157:H7 estimated from outbreak data is considered to be as low as 1 to 100 organisms [3]. The targeting of bacteria to M cells and subsequent capture by macrophages could explain why only a small amount of bacteria would be sufficient to trigger disease, which determines, in part, the efficiency of the infection and the low infectious dose. We propose a new model for EHEC infection in humans (Figure 7) and suggest that bacteria cross the intestinal barrier through M cells overlying PPs. In the lamina propria, bacteria could enter, survive, and produce Stx within resident macrophages, inducing host cell apoptosis. In this case, however, bacteria would be eventually killed without causing bacteraemia. Subsequently, released Stx would cross the downstream blood vessels to reach the kidneys, intestine, and brain leading to severe disease in humans. The study of the relationships between interactions with M cells and the development of disease could help in designing novel therapeutic approaches to EHEC infection.

Figure 7. New working model for EHEC infection in humans.

Figure 7

The diagram shows a monolayer of intestinal epithelial cells with EHEC infection in the lumen. Stx production occurs in the intestine. The bacteria cross the intestinal barrier through M cells. In the lamina propria, bacteria enter, survive, and produce Stx within resident macrophages. Following replication of bacteria in macrophages, extensive Stx production induces host cell death. Subsequently, released Stx could cross the downstream blood vessels to reach the kidneys, intestine, and brain. Damage to these organs results in serious life-threatening complications in humans.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Integrity of murine ileal mucosa determined by monitoring of FITC diffusion. The mucosal integrity was monitored ex vivo in Ussing chambers by following FITC diffusion after infection with EHEC strain 86-24 WT and non pathogenic E. coli strain MG1655. Murine mucosa was isolated from the ileum, with Peyer's Patches (PP) (86-24 WT ▪ and MG1655 □ ) or without PP (86-24 WT • and MG1655 ○) placed in Ussing chambers during a 5-hour contact. One representative set of data is presented.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Integrity of cell monolayers determined by trans-epithelial resistance (TEER) measurement. TEER was monitored during a 5-hour infection in Caco-2 (A) and M cell monolayers (B), infected with EHEC strains 86-24 WT (Caco-2 ▴ and M cells ▵), and EDL 933 (Caco-2 • and M cells ○) or with a non pathogenic E. coli K-12 C600 (Caco-2 ▪ and M cells ◊).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Nicolas Barnich for his help with Ussing chamber, and Muriel Millet for her help in experiments with THP-1 macrophages. We thank Christelle Blavignac, Claire Szczepaniak and Lorraine Gameiro from the Centre Imagerie Cellulaire Santé (CICS, Université d'Auvergne) for technical assistance with electron microscopy and the Imagerie Confocale Clermont-Ferrand (ICCF) platform for confocal microscopy. We acknowledge the useful help of Jeffrey Watts in the editing of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche (JE2526) (http://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/) and by the Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (USC-2018) (http://www.inra.fr/). There are no grant numbers. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Frank C, Werber D, Cramer JP, Askar M, Faber M, et al. Epidemic profile of Shiga-Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2011 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106483. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Struelens M, Palm D, Takkinen J. Enteroaggregative, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak: new microbiological findings boost coordinated investigations by European public health laboratories. Euro Surveill. 2011;16 doi: 10.2807/ese.16.24.19890-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paton JC, Paton AW. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:450–79. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.3.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pradel N, Livrelli V, De Champs C, Palcoux JB, Reynaud A, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, food, and children during a one-year prospective study in France. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1023–31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1023-1031.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beutin L. Emerging enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli, causes and effects of the rise of a human pathogen. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006;53:299–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rangel JM, Sparling PH, Crowe C, Griffin PM, Swerdlow DL. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks, United States, 1982–2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:603–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1104.040739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Karmali MA, Mascarenhas M, Shen S, Ziebell K, Johnson S, et al. Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4930–40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.4930-4940.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johannes L, Romer W. Shiga toxins: from cell biology to biomedical applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;8:105–16. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.DeVinney R, Puente JL, Gauthier A, Goosney D, Finlay BB. Enterohaemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli use a different Tir-based mechanism for pedestal formation. Mol Microbiol. 2001;41:1445–58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frankel G, Phillips AD, Rosenshine I, Dougan G, Kaper JB, et al. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: more subversive elements. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:911–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tree JJ, Wolfson EB, Wang D, Roe AJ, Gally DL. Controlling injection: regulation of type III secretion in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:361–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fitzhenry RJ, Pickard DJ, Hartland EL, Reece S, Dougan G, et al. Intimin type influences the site of human intestinal mucosal colonisation by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Gut. 2002;50:180–5. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pradel N, Bertin Y, Martin C, Livrelli V. Molecular analysis of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from hemolytic-uremic syndrome patients and dairy samples in France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2118–28. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02688-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mahajan A, Currie CG, Mackie S, Tree J, McAteer S, et al. An investigation of the expression and adhesin function of H7 flagella in the interaction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with bovine intestinal epithelium. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11:121–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berin MC, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Egan LJ, Miyamoto Y, Kagnoff MF. Role of EHEC O157:H7 virulence factors in the activation of intestinal epithelial cell NF-kappaB and MAP kinase pathways and the upregulated expression of interleukin 8. Cell Microbiol. 2002;4:635–48. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Phillips AD, Navabpour S, Hicks S, Dougan G, Wallis T, et al. Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 target Peyer's patches in humans and cause attaching/effacing lesions in both human and bovine intestine. Gut. 2000;47:377–81. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chong Y, Fitzhenry R, Heuschkel R, Torrente F, Frankel G, et al. Human intestinal tissue tropism in Escherichia coli O157:H7- initial colonization of terminal ileum and Peyer's patches and minimal colonic adhesion ex vivo. Microbiology. 2007;153:794–802. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003178-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sansonetti PJ. War and peace at mucosal surfaces. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:953–64. doi: 10.1038/nri1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hase K, Kawano K, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Fukuda S, et al. Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH(+) bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature. 2009;462:226–30. doi: 10.1038/nature08529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martinez-Argudo I, Jepson MA. Salmonella translocates across an in vitro M cell model independently of SPI-1 and SPI-2. Microbiology. 2008;154:3887–94. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/021162-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Inman LR, Cantey JR. Specific adherence of Escherichia coli (strain RDEC-1) to membranous (M) cells of the Peyer's patch in Escherichia coli diarrhea in the rabbit. J Clin Invest. 1983;71:1–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI110737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roberts CL, Keita AV, Duncan SH, O'Kennedy N, Söderholm JD, et al. Translocation of Crohn's disease Escherichia coli across M-cells: contrasting effects of soluble plant fibres and emulsifiers. Gut. 2010;59:1331–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.195370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chassaing B, Rolhion N, de Vallée A, Salim SY, Prorok-Hamon M, et al. Crohn's disease-associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia coli target murine and human Peyer's Patches via Long Polar Fimbriae. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:966–75. doi: 10.1172/JCI44632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naylor SW, Low JC, Besser TE, Mahajan A, Gunn GJ, et al. Lymphoid follicle-dense mucosa at the terminal rectum is the principal site of colonization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the bovine host. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1505–12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1505-1512.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hitotsubashi S, Fujii Y, Yamanaka H, Okamoto K. Some properties of purified Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. Infect Immun. 1992;60:4468–74. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4468-4474.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kerneis S, Bogdanova A, Kraehenbuhl JP, Pringault E. Conversion by Peyer's patch lymphocytes of human enterocytes into M cells that transport bacteria. Science. 1997;277:949–52. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gullberg E, Leonard M, Karlsson J, Hopkins AM, Brayden D, et al. Expression of specific markers and particle transport in a new human intestinal M-cell model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279:808–13.4. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Glasser AL, Boudeau J, Barnich N, Perruchot MH, Colombel JF, et al. Adherent invasive Escherichia coli strains from patients with Crohn's disease survive and replicate within macrophages without inducing host cell death. Infect Immun. 2001;69:5529–37. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5529-5537.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bringer MA, Glasser AL, Tung CH, Meresse S, Darfeuille-Michaud A. The Crohn's disease-associated adherent-invasive Escherichia coli strain LF82 replicates in mature phagolysosomes within J774 macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:471–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee SY, Cherla RP, Tesh VL. Simultaneous induction of apoptotic and survival signaling pathways in macrophage-like THP-1 cells by Shiga toxin 1. Infect Immun. 2007;75:1291–302. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01700-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee SY, Lee MS, Cherla RP, Tesh VL. Shiga toxin 1 induces apoptosis through the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in human monocytic cells. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:770–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Etienne-Mesmin L, Livrelli V, Privat M, Denis S, Cardot JM, et al. Effect of a new probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain on survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a dynamic gastrointestinal model. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1127–31. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02130-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jones BD, Ghori N, Falkow S. Salmonella Typhimurium initiates murine infection by penetrating and destroying the specialized epithelial M cells of the Peyer's patches. J Exp Med. 1994;180:15–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martinez-Argudo I, Sands C, Jepson MA. Translocation of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli across an in vitro M cell model is regulated by its type III secretion system. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1538–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hamzaoui N, Kerneis S, Caliot E, Pringault E. Expression and distribution of beta1 integrins in in vitro-induced M cells: implications for Yersinia adhesion to Peyer's patch epithelium. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6:817–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baumler AJ, Tsolis RM, Heffron F. The lpf fimbrial operon mediates adhesion of Salmonella Typhimurium to murine Peyer's patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:279–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pradel N, Leroy-Setrin S, Joly B, Livrelli V. Genomic subtraction to identify and characterize sequences of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O91:H21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:2316–25. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2316-2325.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perna NT, Plunkett G, 3rd, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, et al. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature. 2001;409:529–33. doi: 10.1038/35054089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doughty S, Sloan J, Bennett-Wood V, Robertson M, Robins-Browne RM, et al. Identification of a novel fimbrial gene cluster related to long polar fimbriae in locus of enterocyte effacement-negative strains of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2002;70:6761–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6761-6769.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Torres AG, Slater TM, Patel SD, Popov VL, Arenas-Hernandez MMP. Contribution of the Ler- and H-NS-Regulated Long Polar Fimbriae of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during Binding to Tissue-Cultured Cells. Infect Immun. 2008;76:5062–71. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00654-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fitzhenry R, Dahan S, Torres AG, Chong Y, Heuschkel R, et al. Long polar fimbriae and tissue tropism in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1741–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Poirier K, Faucher SP, Beland M, Brousseau R, Gannon V, et al. Escherichia coli O157:H7 survives within human macrophages: global gene expression profile and involvement of the Shiga toxins. Infect Immun. 2008;76:4814–22. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00446-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hurley BP, Thorpe CM, Acheson DW. Shiga toxin translocation across intestinal epithelial cells is enhanced by neutrophil transmigration. Infect Immun. 2001;69:6148–55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6148-6155.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tarr PI, Neill MA, Clausen CR, Newland JW, Neill RJ, et al. Genotypic variation in pathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from patients in Washington, 1984–1987. J Infect Dis. 1989;159:344–7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.2.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Darfeuille-Michaud A, Neut C, Barnich N, Lederman E, Di Martino P, et al. Presence of adherent Escherichia coli strains in ileal mucosa of patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1405–13. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Valdivia RH, Hromockyj AE, Monack D, Ramakrishnan L, Falkow S. Applications for green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the study of host-pathogen interactions. Gene. 1996;173:47–52. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00706-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Integrity of murine ileal mucosa determined by monitoring of FITC diffusion. The mucosal integrity was monitored ex vivo in Ussing chambers by following FITC diffusion after infection with EHEC strain 86-24 WT and non pathogenic E. coli strain MG1655. Murine mucosa was isolated from the ileum, with Peyer's Patches (PP) (86-24 WT ▪ and MG1655 □ ) or without PP (86-24 WT • and MG1655 ○) placed in Ussing chambers during a 5-hour contact. One representative set of data is presented.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Integrity of cell monolayers determined by trans-epithelial resistance (TEER) measurement. TEER was monitored during a 5-hour infection in Caco-2 (A) and M cell monolayers (B), infected with EHEC strains 86-24 WT (Caco-2 ▴ and M cells ▵), and EDL 933 (Caco-2 • and M cells ○) or with a non pathogenic E. coli K-12 C600 (Caco-2 ▪ and M cells ◊).

(TIF)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES