Abstract
We describe the synthesis and development of new reactive DOTA-metal complexes for covalently targeting engineered receptors in vivo, which have superior tumor uptake and clearance properties for biomedical applications. These probes are found to clear efficiently through the kidneys and minimally through other routes, but bind persistently in the tumor target. We also explore the new technique of Cerenkov luminescence imaging to optically monitor radiolabeled probe distribution and kinetics in vivo. Cerenkov luminescence imaging uniquely enables sensitive noninvasive in vivo imaging of a β− emitter such as 90Y with an optical imager.
Developing synthetic molecules that specifically target cancer cells is a major goal of biomedical science. Among the most promising approaches are those based on affinity for a molecular target prominently displayed on the target cells, such as the RGD peptides for binding to cell surface integrins,1 or the somatostatin analog octreotide for binding to type 2 somatostatin receptors.2 This strategy may be complemented by the development of molecules with connector functions that link selectable sites of disease in vivo to validated probes, such as the widely used synthetic DOTA-metal complexes. Though there are variations, such connector molecules usually are engineered proteins derived from antibodies and are useful for “pretargeting,” where the connector is administered before the probe.3, 4 An example is the streptavidin-scFv fusion proteins used as connectors for pretargeted imaging and therapy, along with biotin-tagged DOTA-metal probes possessing optimized biodistribution properties.5 An alternative to the biotin-streptavidin system is infinite affinity probe capture using an engineered binding site that forms a stable covalent bond to the probe.6 When formulated using a humanized antibody, the latter system presents fewer concerns about protein immunogenicity than streptavidin. Altering the cell-binding moiety of the connector protein while retaining the probe-binding receptor should make it practical to image a choice of biological targets with the same small probe molecule. Other approaches related to pretargeting include the dock-and-lock technique,7 and a tetrazine/trans-cyclooctene cycloaddition strategy.8
Previously we engineered an antibody into a specific DOTA probe-binding receptor site, with a cysteine side chain placed for permanent probe capture.9, 10 Wei et al. have inserted this into reporter gene DAbR1 and demonstrated its favorable probe-capture properties in an animal model (Figure 1A).11 Here we consider changes in the structure and function of the synthetic DOTA probe, to further improve its biodistribution properties. Our prior work employed Michael addition of the cysteine thiol to an acrylamide side chain on the AABD(Y) probe, here denoted as 1-Y (Figure 1C).9, 10 This reaction is clean and efficient in vivo and forms a stable thioether bond between probe and receptor, but clearance of the free probe occurs significantly through both the urinary and the slower intestinal route,11 delaying removal of uncaptured probe from the organism. With the goal of identifying new probes that clear efficiently through the kidneys and minimally through other routes, we considered thiol-disulfide interchange, which has several features that allow manipulation of the probe's properties in vivo.
The DAbR1 tumor model system described by Wei et al.11 provides an excellent starting point for testing the properties of candidate probe molecules in vivo. Because of the abundance of the free thiol form of the essential cysteine demonstrated for U-87 glioma expressing the DAbR1 reporter,12 we chose to explore probes such as 5-90Y carrying the disulfide group as replacements for the electrophilic acryloyl group. This chemistry involves displacement of the leaving group RSH after the probe binds to the receptor, forming a new disulfide bond between the probe and the engineered cysteine on the protein. A motivation for changing from Michael addition to thiol-disulfide interchange was that if any probe-receptor conjugates are taken into endosomes inside cells, the disulfide bond between protein and probe is likely to be reduced and cleaved, releasing the probe and lessening concerns about triggering an immune response.
To implement the use of thiol-disulfide chemistry, it is necessary to address several points. The disulfide group on the new class of probes reacts only with thiols under physiological conditions, but this raises the question whether it would tag naturally occurring thiols in the body such as Cys-34 on albumin; what's more, it is possible that any such potential side reactions would be influenced by the nature of the side chain R in Figure 1C,D. A separate concern is that a disulfide linkage to receptor DAbR1 might prove less stable in vivo than the thioether linkage; if so, this could diminish the advantage of covalent bond formation.
Another consideration is that the side chain R might be varied to modify the clearance properties of the probe, for example by increasing its hydrophilicity, in addition to adjusting the reactivity of the probe's disulfide group. The structure of the parent protein-probe complex from which DAbR1 was designed shows that the DOTA moiety of the probe interacts directly with the protein, while the probe's side chain protrudes into solution (Figure 1B).13 This gives rise to the further possibility that a branched side chain can be introduced in order to add additional functions, such as a carbohydrate group to modify biodistribution.14 Here we report the first studies exploring these questions, using the new technique of Cerenkov luminescence imaging to optically monitor radiolabeled probe distribution and kinetics in vivo.15 Cerenkov luminescence imaging uniquely enables sensitive noninvasive in vivo imaging of a β− emitter such as 90Y, and offers informative qualitative images with relatively simple instrumentation.
Multimodal DAbR1-2A-mCherry Reporter Gene and Stable Expression in U-87 Glioma Cells
DNA sequences encoding the DAbR1 and mCherry reporter genes were subcloned to a lentiviral expression vector and linked by sequence encoding a 2A “self-cleaving” peptide to enable bicistronic expression of both reporter genes driven by a single CMV promoter. U-87 glioma cells were exposed to lentiviral particles delivering the basic reporter / selectable marker expression cassette to establish the U-87/DAbR1-2A-mCherry, or U-87/DC cell line. This cell line was then used for paired injections into the subscapular region of SCID Hairless Outbred (SHO) mice, with U-87/DC injected to the right shoulder and the parental U-87 line injected to the left shoulder. Details are provided in Supporting Information.
Probe Synthesis and Imaging
Prior to introduction of radiolabeled probe, mice were imaged on a Maestro 2 (Cambridge Research and Instrumentation) to verify fluorescent mCherry (and indirectly DAbR1) expression in U-87/DC derived tumors (Figure 2A). The new probes were synthesized as outlined in Scheme 1 and radiolabeled with 90Y by the methods detailed in Supporting Information. Probes (8 μCi in 100 μL total volume) were administered via tail vein injection to mice sedated with 2% isoflurane. Following administration, Cerenkov luminescence images of the 90Y distributions were acquired dynamically for a period of 45 min—Figure 2B shows the image acquired beginning at 9 min post injection on an IVIS 100 system (Caliper Life Sciences)—after which time the mice were awakened and returned to their cage. Cerenkov images were acquired again at 1.5 and 3.5 h post injection (Figures 2C and 2D).
Images
As shown in Figure 2, tail-vein injection of 5b-90Y in 3 animals led to clear visualization of the U-87 tumor on the right shoulder, harboring the DAbR1 gene. A matching tumor on the left shoulder lacked this gene and was not visualized. Parallel results were observed in vivo with the homologous probe 5a-90Y. Uncaptured probes cleared almost exclusively through the kidney, leading to excellent tumor/background ratios one to two hours after injection.
Biodistributions
To address whether the disulfide bond formed between the DAbR1 receptor and either of the 5-90Y probes persists in vivo, biodistributions were carried out 48 h after probe injection. Results are plotted in Figure 3. Even at 48 h, both 5-90Y probes show excellent concentration in tumor (6.3±2.1 %/g for 5b-90Y; 14.4±4.5 %/g for 5a-90Y; p<0.05). The kidneys showed highest normal organ uptake (0.38±0.03 %/g for 5b-90Y; 1.71±0.19 %/g for 5a-90Y; p<0.05); all other organs were <0.2 %/g. Both 5-90Y probes persist in the tumor to a degree that compares favorably with 1-90Y (see below), implying that the attachment to DAbR1 is stable in vivo. This stability may be related to the noncovalent binding affinity of probe for receptor (KD=2×10-9 M),12 which facilitates the specific disulfide bond formation. Note that without covalent attachment, the dissociation of similar probes from DAbR1 occurs with a half-life of ≈100 sec.12
It is notable that side reactions with the free cysteine side chain on the abundant (0.5 mM) albumin molecules in circulation evidently did not occur to a significant degree. Part of the reason for this may be that the disulfide bonds in 5a or 5b are not activated in the way that disulfide bonds are when they contain the familiar thiopyridine or thionitrobenzoate leaving groups, so there is little thermodynamic driving force to propel thiol-disulfide interchange between molecules diffusing freely in solution. On the other hand, after the reversible probe-receptor complex has been formed, release of the RSH leaving group (Figure 1D) may be entropically favorable due to the extra translational and rotational degrees of freedom created by this process.16 Thiol-disulfide interchange between the probes and small thiols may be more difficult to detect, but the significant differences between the biodistributions of 5a-90Y and 5b-90Y suggest that interchange between these probes and small thiols are not important, since that would tend to make the probe distributions similar. For example, if both probes rapidly reacted with free cysteine in circulation and lost their original leaving groups, we would expect their biodistributions to be identical.
Previously Wei et al. used a related model system, finding 24 h tumor uptake of 1-90Y was 4.9±0.6 %/g. Other organs showed some uptake of 1-90Y at 24 h, notably spleen (1.3±0.5 %/g), liver (0.8±0.3 %/g), and small intestine (0.3±0.3 %/g); bone uptake was a satisfactory 0.2±0.1 %/g.11 In contrast to 1-90Y, the 5-90Y probes exhibit very little residue in spleen, liver, or intestine; instead, they show modestly higher kidney uptake. This is corroborated by the Cerenkov images, which imply clearance mainly through the kidney with very little through the liver and intestines. It is interesting to note that the 5b-90Y probe shows significantly lower concentration in both tumor and kidney than 5a-90Y (Figure 3). While the cause requires more investigation, it may be that compared to the acetate group of 5a, the bulkier propionate group of 5b reduces the accessibility of the disulfide bond. Further explorations of alternative leaving groups may refine the properties of this family of probes.
Time scale for target visualization
As shown in Figure 2, substantial tumor uptake occurs within a few minutes, and background clears within a few hours. This is a highly favorable set of results that suggests, for example, that glucose might be replaced by 2-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for PET imaging on this time scale. On the other hand, the very long persistence in the target indicates stable attachment of the probe to the receptor, which would be favorable for multi-day procedures such as targeted radiotherapy with 90Y.5 While imaging requires good target/background ratios, preferably at short times, therapy benefits from long residence times of the radiopharmaceutical on the target, for the delivery of the maximum radiation dose. The therapeutic radionuclide 90Y decays with a physical half-life of 64 h, making it advantageous to bind a probe such as 5-90Y on the target for at least that long; permanent binding is excellently suited for this application.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Imaging and animal expenses were supported in part by NIH research grant CA143098 (SRC). Chemical synthesis was supported in part by NIH research grants CA016861 (CFM) and CA136639 (CFM). Jennifer Fung and Michelle Connell, Center for Molecular and Genomic Imaging, UC Davis, provided technical support for the imaging studies.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details for all syntheses and experimental methods. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Literature Cited
- 1.Liu S. Radiolabeled Cyclic RGD Peptides as Integrin alphavbeta3-Targeted Radiotracers: Maximizing Binding Affinity via Bivalency. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:2199–2213. doi: 10.1021/bc900167c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maresca KP, Marquis JC, Hillier SM, Lu G, Femia FJ, Zimmerman CN, Eckelman WC, Joyal JL, Babich JW. Novel Polar Single Amino Acid Chelates for Technetium-99m Tricarbonyl-Based Radiopharmaceuticals with Enhanced Renal Clearance: Application to Octreotide. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:1032–1042. doi: 10.1021/bc900517x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goodwin DA, Meares CF, Watanabe N, McTigue M, Chaovapong W, Ransone CM, Renn O, Greiner DP, Kukis DL, Kronenberger SI. Pharmacokinetics Of Pretargeted Monoclonal Antibody 2D12.5 And Y-88-Janus-2-(p-Nitrobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic Acid (DOTA) In Balb/c Mice With KHJJ Mouse Adenocarcinoma - A Model For Y-90 Radioimmunotherapy. Cancer Res. 1994;54:5937–5946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weiden P, Breitz H, Press O, Appelbaum J, Stone D, Bryan K, Su F, Axworthy D, Hylarides M, Theodore L, Beaumier P, Reno J. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in the treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL): Advantage of pretargeted RIT (PRITR) Blood. 1998;92:414A–414A. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Press O, Wilbur S, Lin Y, Hamlin D, Gopal A, Pagel J. Conventional and pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of B cell lymphomas using CD20, CD22, and HLA DR as target antigens. Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharm. 2008;23:522–522. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chmura AJ, Orton MS, Meares CF. Antibodies with infinite affinity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8480–8484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151260298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goldenberg DM, Rossi EA, Sharkey RM, McBride WJ, Chang CH. Multifunctional Antibodies by the Dock-and-Lock Method for Improved Cancer Imaging and Therapy by Pretargeting. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:158–163. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.046185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Devaraj N, Upadhyay R, Haun JB, Hilderbrand SA, Weissleder R. Fast and Sensitive Pretargeted Labeling of Cancer Cells through a Tetrazine/trans-Cyclooctene Cycloaddition. Angew Chem Intl Ed. 2009;48:7013–7016. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Corneillie TM, Lee KC, Whetstone PA, Wong JP, Meares CF. Irreversible Engineering of the Multielement-Binding Antibody 2D12.5 and Its Complementary Ligands. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15:1392–1402. doi: 10.1021/bc049824m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Corneillie TM, Whetstone PA, Lee KC, Wong JP, Meares CF. Converting Weak Binders into Infinite Binders. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15:1389–1391. doi: 10.1021/bc049825e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wei LH, Olafsen T, Radu C, Hildebrandt IJ, McCoy MR, Phelps ME, Meares C, Wu AM, Czernin J, Weber WA. Engineered Antibody Fragments with Infinite Affinity as Reporter Genes for PET Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1828–1835. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aweda TA, Beck HE, Wu AM, Wei LH, Weber WA, Meares CF. Rates and Equilibria for Probe Capture by an Antibody with Infinite Affinity. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:784–791. doi: 10.1021/bc100046p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Corneillie TM, Fisher AJ, Meares CF. Crystal structures of two complexes of the rare-earth-DOTA-binding antibody 2D12.5: Ligand generality from a chiral system. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:15039–15048. doi: 10.1021/ja037236y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schottelius M, Rau F, Reubi JC, Schwaiger M, Wester HJ. Modulation of Pharmacokinetics of Radioiodinated Sugar-Conjugated Somatostatin Analogues by Variation of Peptide Net Charge and Carbohydration Chemistry. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005;16:429–437. doi: 10.1021/bc0499228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robertson R, Germanos MS, Li C, Mitchell GS, Cherry SR, Silva MD. Optical Imaging of Cerenkov Light Generation from Positron-Emitting Radiotracers. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:N355–365. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/16/N01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Page MI, Jencks WP. Entropic Contributions to Rate Accelerations in Enzymic and Intramolecular Reactions and Chelate Effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68:1678–1683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Day JJ, Marquez BV, Beck HE, Aweda TA, Gawande PD, Meares CF. Chemically modified antibodies as diagnostic imaging agents. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2010;14:803–809. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.