Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1966 May;91(5):1713–1723. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1713-1723.1966

Laboratory Assays of Different Types of Field Trial Typhoid Vaccines and Relationship to Efficacy in Man

Margaret Pittman 1, Howard J Bohner 1
PMCID: PMC316112  PMID: 5937234

Abstract

Pittman, Margaret (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.), and Howard J. Bohner. Laboratory assays of different types of field trial typhoid vaccines and relationship to efficacy in man. J. Bacteriol. 91:1713–1723. 1966.—Antibody responses of rabbits to H, O, and Vi antigens did not differentiate vaccine K (acetone-killed and dried) from vaccine L (heat-phenolized and dried) relative to human efficacy. A mouse protection assay in which intraperitoneal vaccination and challenge suspended in mucin were used showed vaccine K to be 3.69 times more potent than vaccine L; with subcutaneous vaccination, vaccine K was only 0.78 as potent. With the challenge suspended in saline, the effect of the route of vaccination was accentuated. An old U.S. reference vaccine, heat-phenolized, induced the same types of response as vaccine L. In the assay with intraperitoneal vaccination and mucin-suspended challenge, the potency of vaccine K relative to vaccine L and the potencies of Polish vaccines, P, N, and T, relative to vaccine K were directly correlated with the efficacies of the vaccines for man, as reported for the recent World Health Organization cooperative field trials in British Guiana, Yugoslavia, and Poland. This assay gave a high potency for alcohol-treated vaccine V relative to vaccine L, but the values did not reflect relative efficacy in the USSR field trial; the subcutaneous vaccination assay more closely reflected their human efficacy. An analysis suggested that vaccine K had a mouse protective factor not present in vaccine L and that vaccine V may have had a third factor. The influence of a few variable factors on the assay with intraperitoneal vaccination and mucin-suspended challenge was studied briefly.

Full text

PDF
1713

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHCROFT M. T., RITCHIE J. M., NICHOLSON C. C., STUART C. A. ANTIBODY RESPONSES TO VACCINATION OF BRITISH GUIANA SCHOOLCHILDREN WITH HEART-KILLED-PHENOLIZED AND ACETONE-KILLED LYOPHILIZED TYPHOID VACCINES. Am J Hyg. 1964 Sep;80:221–228. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENENSON A. S. SEROLOGICAL RESPONSES OF MAN TO TYPHOID VACCINES. Bull World Health Organ. 1964;30:653–662. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CVJETANOVIC B., UEMURA K. THE PRESENT STATUS OF FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES OF TYPHOID AND PARATYPHOID VACCINES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO STUDIES SPONSORED BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Bull World Health Organ. 1965;32:29–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EDSALL G., CARLSON M. C., FORMAL S. B., BENENSON A. S. Laboratory tests of typhoid vaccines used in a controlled field study. Bull World Health Organ. 1959;20:1017–1032. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joó I., Pusztai Z., Juhász V. P. Untersuchungen zur Bewertung der in Britischguayana und Jugoslawien erprobten Typhusvaccinen. Z Hyg Infektionskr. 1965;150(4):290–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LANDY M., JOHNSON A. G., WEBSTER M. E. Studies on Vi antigen. VIII. Role of acetyl in antigenic activity. Am J Hyg. 1961 Jan;73:55–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LANDY M. Studies on Vi antigen. VII. Characteristics of the immune response in the mouse. Am J Hyg. 1957 Jan;65(1):81–93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PITTMAN M., LIEBERMAN J. E. An analysis of the Wilson-Worcester method for determining the median effective dose of pertussis vaccine. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1948 Jan;38(1 Pt 1):15–21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.38.1_pt_1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SPAUN J. STUDIES ON THE INFLUENCE OF THE ROUTE OF IMMUNIZATION IN THE ACTIVE MOUSE PROTECTION TEST WITH INTRAPERITONEAL CHALLENGE FOR POTENCY ASSAY OF TYPHOID VACCINES. Bull World Health Organ. 1964;31:793–798. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SPAUN J., UEMURA K. INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE PREPARATIONS OF TYPHOID VACCINE. A REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE LABORATORY STUDIES. Bull World Health Organ. 1964;31:761–791. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STANDFAST A. F. A report on the laboratory assays carried out at the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine on the typhoid vaccines used in the field study in Yugoslavia. Bull World Health Organ. 1960;23:37–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES