Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1966 Dec;92(6):1604–1608. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.6.1604-1608.1966

Effect of the Normal Microbial Flora on the Resistance of the Small Intestine to Infection

Gerald D Abrams 1, Jane E Bishop 1
PMCID: PMC316237  PMID: 5334766

Abstract

Abrams, Gerald D. (The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor), and Jane E. Bishop. Effect of the normal microbial flora on the resistance of the small intestine to infection. J. Bacteriol. 92:1604–1608. 1966.—Mucosal structure in the small intestine is known to be influenced by the normal microbial flora. This suggests that mucosal resistance to invasion by enteric pathogens might also be affected by the flora. To assess this possibility, germ-free and conventional mice were challenged with Salmonella typhimurium, and both the growth of organisms within the intestinal lumen and the translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes were studied quantitatively. There were significantly more organisms 24 hr after intragastric challenge in the mesenteric nodes of germ-free animals than in those of conventional ones. However, since intraluminal growth in the intestine was also greater in germ-free animals, no conclusion could be drawn about mucosal resistance per se. Results were similar when the challenge was intraduodenal. However, when intestinal emptying was prevented by ileal ligation before challenge, both intraluminal growth and translocation of S. typhimurium were equal in the two groups of mice. It is concluded from these data, as well as from preliminary dye studies of intestinal motility, that the normal flora does not influence mucosal resistance directly, but may alter enteric infection by affecting intestinal emptying.

Full text

PDF
1604

Images in this article

1606Image
on p.1606

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABRAMS G. D., BAUER H., SPRINZ H. Influence of the normal flora on mucosal morphology and cellular renewal in the ileum. A comparison of germ-free and conventional mice. Lab Invest. 1963 Mar;12:355–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOHNHOFF M., MILLER C. P., MARTIN W. R. RESISTANCE OF THE MOUSE'S INTESTINAL TRACT TO EXPERIMENTAL SALMONELLA INFECTION. I. FACTORS WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE INITIATION OF INFECTION BY ORAL INOCULATION. J Exp Med. 1964 Nov 1;120:805–816. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.5.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIXON J. M. The fate of bacteria in the small intestine. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1960 Jan;79:131–140. doi: 10.1002/path.1700790116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dupont J. R., Jervis H. R., Sprinz H. Auerbach's plexus of the rat cecum in relation to the germfree state. J Comp Neurol. 1965 Aug;125(1):11–18. doi: 10.1002/cne.901250103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FORMAL S. B., ABRAMS G. D., SCHNEIDER H., SPRINZ H. Experimental Shigella infections. VI. Role of the small intestine in an experimental infection in guinea pigs. J Bacteriol. 1963 Jan;85:119–125. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.1.119-125.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FORMAL S. B., DAMMIN G., SPRINZ H., KUNDEL D., SCHNEIDER H., HOROWITZ R. E., FORBES M. Experimental Shigella infections. V. Studies in germ-free guinea pigs. J Bacteriol. 1961 Aug;82:284–287. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.2.284-287.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRETER R. In vivo and in vitro antagonism of intestinal bacteria against Shigellaflexneri. II. The inhibitory mechanism. J Infect Dis. 1962 Jan-Feb;110:38–46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/110.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GERICHTER C. B. The dissemination of Salmonella typhi, S. paratyphi A and S. paratyphi B through the organs of the white mouse by oral infection. J Hyg (Lond) 1960 Sep;58:307–319. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400038420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GORDON H. A., BRUCKNER-KARDOSS E. Effect of normal microbial flora on intestinal surface area. Am J Physiol. 1961 Jul;201:175–178. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1961.201.1.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HILDEBRAND G. J., WOLOCHOW H. Translocation of bacteriophage across the intestinal wall of the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 Jan;109:183–185. doi: 10.3181/00379727-109-27146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MEYNELL G. G. Antibacterial mechanisms of the mouse gut. II. The role of Eh and volatile fatty acids in the normal gut. Br J Exp Pathol. 1963 Apr;44:209–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PHILLIPS A. W., NEWCOMB H. R., SMITH J. E., LACHAPELLER Serotonin in the small intestine of conventional and germfree chicks. Nature. 1961 Oct 28;192:380–380. doi: 10.1038/192380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SPRINZ H., KUNDEL D. W., DAMMIN G. J., HOROWITZ R. E., SCHNEIDER H., FORMAL S. B. The response of the germfree guinea pig to oral bacterial challenge with Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. Am J Pathol. 1961 Dec;39:681–695. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES