Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Immunol. 2011 Aug 4;48(15-16):2220–2223. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.06.441

Zebrafish immunoglobulin IgD: unusual exon usage and quantitative expression profiles with IgM and IgZ/T heavy chain isotypes

Anastasia M Zimmerman 1,*, Farah M Moustafa 1, Kryzstof E Romanowski 1, Lisa A Steiner 2
PMCID: PMC3163713  NIHMSID: NIHMS310182  PMID: 21820179

Abstract

The zebrafish is an emerging model for comparative immunology and biomedical research. In contrast to the five heavy chain isotype system of mice and human (IgD, IgM, IgA, IgG, IgE), zebrafish harbor gene segments for IgD, IgM, and novel heavy chain isotype called IgZ/T which appears restricted to bony fishes. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a suite of quantitative real time RT-PCR protocols to measure IgH expression in a vertebrate model which has considerable promise for modelling both pathogenic infection and chronic conditions leading to immune dysfunction. Specific primers were designed and following verification of their specificty, relative expression levels of IgD, IgM, and IgZ/T were measured in triplicate for zebrafish raised under standard laboratory conditions. During embryonic stages, low levels of each heavy chain isotype (IgH) were detected with each increasing steadily between 2 and 17 weeks post fertilization. Overall IgM>IgZ>IgD throughout zebrafish development with the copy number of IgM being several fold higher than that of IgD or IgZ/T. IgD exon usage was also characterized, as its extremely long size and presence of a stop codon in the second IgD exon in zebrafish, raised questions as to how this antibody might be expressed. Zebrafish IgD was found to be a chimeric immunoglobulin, with the third IgD exon spliced to the first IgM constant exon thereby circumventing the first and second IgD exons. Collectively, the qRT-PCR results represent the first comparative profile of IgD, IgM, IgZ/T expression over the lifespan of any fish species and the primers and assay parameters reported should prove useful in enabling researchers to rapidly quantify changes in IgH expression in zebrafish models of disease where altered IgH expression is manifested.

Introduction

Because of their key role in a variety of diseases and immune responses, antibodies have been studied in many capacities and consequently represent some of the best-characterized genetic regions in traditional animal disease models (mice and humans). Data mining of the zebrafish genome has facilitated identification of the gene segments encoding antibodies in this animal model (Danilova et al. 2005, Hsu and Cristicitello 2006, Zimmerman et al. 2008). In contrast to mice and humans which harbor gene segments for five immunologlobulin heavy chain isotypes (IgD, IgM, IgA, IgG, IgE), equivalents of IgG, IgA, and IgE gene segments are not found in zebrafish. Surprisingly, a third heavy chain isotype referred to as IgZ/IgT was identified in both zebrafish (Danilova et al. 2005) and rainbow trout (Hansen et al. 2006). This IgZ/IgT isotype has also recently been found in stickleback (Gambon-Deza et al. 2010) and carp (Ryo et al. 2010) and appears to be a unique heavy chain isotype restricted to bony fish. To date, quantitative age-dependent expression of all three (IgD, IgM, IgZ) isotypes has yet to be elucidated in zebrafish, trout, or any other teleost species.

Changes in the relative proportion of IgH isotype expression are a hallmark of immune responses in mammals as the binding of antigen to a naïve B cell triggers the cell to proliferate and secrete IgM and IgD antibodies. As the immune response progresses, antigen stimulated B cells in mice and humans can further alter their expression patterns to IgA, IgG, or IgE through class switch recombination (CSR). It is important to note that neither CSR nor IgA, IgG, IgE isotypes have been found in bony fish despite the presence of the AID gene which is considered a key regulator for CSR in mammals (Saunders and Magor 2004). In humans, deficiencies in CSR have been found to be underlying features of several chronic pathological conditions correlating to elevated levels of IgM with a relative absence of IgA, IgG, and IgE (Levy et al. 1997, Notarangelo et al. 2006, Buckley 2008). Immunodeficiencies involving immunoglobulins have also been found to manifest conditions of recurrent respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, autoimmunity, and cancer predisposition in humans (Arason et al. 2010). Thus, it appears both isotype diversity and changes in quantitative expression of IgH are central to maintaining overall health. Although the genes encoding IgD, IgM, and IgZ/T have been identified in bony fish by database mining, the biological functions of these IgH isotypes are yet unknown (Ryo et al. 2010).

In order to understand the complex molecular events involved in the initiation and progression of immunodeficiency disorders, and to develop conditions that modulate either infection or disease, animal models that attempt to mimic human pathology are often utilized. The zebrafish has been used for in vivo modeling of chronic and autoimmune disorders including neurological diseases (Guo 2004), muscular dystrophy (Bassett and Currie 2004), acute renal failure (Hentschel et al. 2005), diabetes (Kinkel et al. 2009), hematopoietic disease (Traver et al. 2004, Walters et al. 2010) and cancer (Patton and Zon 2005, Mione and Trede 2010). Both gram-positive bacteria Mycobacterium spp. (Hegedus et al. 2009, Tobin et al. 2010) and gram-negative Aeromonas spp. (Lam et al. 2004, Rodriguez et al. 2008) have also been associated with infectious disease in zebrafish. Given that the gene segments encoding immunoglobulin loci have now been described in zebrafish, expression of these genes during normal development and in response to pathogens can now be studied in detail. Moreover, understanding how different Ig isotypes contribute to immunity may prove valuable in establishing knockout models of immunodeficiency in the zebrafish model.

In this study, we designed and optimized quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) primers, reagent conditions, and cycle parameters to quantify immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene expression in the zebrafish model. These qRT-PCR protocols were used to generate comparative analyses of IgD, IgM, and IgZ expression over a range of embryonic, juvenile, and adult stages in zebrafish. The specificity of the qRT-PCR protocols were verified using zebrafish rag−/− models for immune deficiency as a negative control. In addition, zebrafish IgD exon usage was characterized, as its extensive repetitive exon configurations, unlike that of mice and humans, raises questions as to how this large antibody might be expressed. Taken together, a novel chimeric splicing pattern in IgD was identified and the qRT-PCR results provide baseline profiles for immunoglobulin heavy chain isotype expression over a wide range of developmental stages in the zebrafish model.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Zebrafish (Tübingen strain) were obtained from the Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC, Eugene, Oregon) and subsequent matings of these fish were utilized to generate fish at different developmental time points. To ensure developmental synchrony, all embryos, juvenile, and adult fish were raised at low densities according to standard laboratory conditions described by Westerfield (1994). A separate population of rag−/− zebrafish was generated by breeding rag+/− fish obtained from Artemis Pharmaceuticals (Colonge, Germany). Rag−/− zebrafish are deficient in V(D)J-rearrangement (Wienholds et al. 2002) and as such were used as negative controls in this study.

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from Tübingen embryos at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 days post fertilization (dpf) and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 weeks post fertilization (wpf) were isolated in triplicate for each age group using Trizol (Life Technologies) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. In addition, total RNA was prepared from adult Tübingen fish at 4.3, 7.1, 9, 10.8, 11, 17 and 19 months of age and from rag−/− fish at 8 months of age. Due to vast differences in body size, approximately 50 embryos were used for 0–10 dpf isolations, 10–50 fish were pooled for weekly time points, and for adult stages three or more fish were pooled. For all samples, whole fish were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, pulverized with a mortar and pestle, and samples maintained at −80°C until RNA was isolated. RNA concentrations were determined by OD260 measurements, and 1.0 µg of RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Biorad) incorporating oligo-dT and random hexamer primers. In addition, cDNA was prepared using the protocol described above for a tissue panel (thymus, pronephros, mesonephros, spleen, heart, liver, brain, intestine, muscle, gills) pooled from 20 zebrafish at 8 months of age.

Molecular Cloning of Zebrafish IgD

Conventional PCR and the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche) using cDNA from poly-A enriched pronepheros and mesonepheros samples were utilized to evaluate IgD exon utilization. PCR reactions were carried out using conditions optimized for a series of primers designed to amplify overlapping regions of zebrafish IgD. In all cases, primers spanned one or more introns to facilitate discrimination of genomic DNA from targeted cDNA. In addition, 3’ and 5’ RACE with IgD specific primers were carried out to obtain additional IgD sequences. Amplicons of appropriate sizes to candidate exons were purified from 2% agarose gels using a Qiaquick Gel Purification kit (QIAgen), cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO vectors (Invitrogen) and transformed into TOP10 cells (Invitrogen). Colonies were picked by blue/white screening, expanded, and plasmid DNA was purified using the QIAgen Miniprep Kit. EcoR1 restriction digests were performed to identify clones with inserts. Inserts were sequenced bi-directionally using either M13 forward and M13 reverse primers or gene specific internal primers.

Quantitative PCR

Primers were designed for IgD, IgM, IgZ/T and a control gene β-actin using Primer 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA). Pairs of optimized primers and cycling conditions for IgD, IgM, IgZ/T, and the β-actin gene are reported in Table 1. For each developmental time point, qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate on a MyIQ (Biorad) instrument using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Biorad) in a reaction volume of 20 µl with a final concentration of 1X SYBR Green, 0.5µM of each primer and 1 µl of the first strand cDNA samples. Melting curves were performed from 60 to 95°C with reads every 0.2°C and 5 second holds between each to determine amplification specificity. In all cases, the amplifications were specific and no amplification was observed in the negative controls (water blanks, no primers, RNA without reverse transcription). Amplification was carried out for 40 cycles with fluorescence readings acquired at the annealing step of each cycle. For each PCR replicate, threshold cycle (Ct) values were determined separately. Amplification efficiencies (E) and correlation coefficient R2 values were calculated based on the use of serial dilutions of control plasmids with IgD, IgM, IgZ/T, or β-actin inserts that we created in our lab (see footnote for availability). For each plate, appropriate blanks as controls (no-cDNA, no-reverse transcriptase, no-primers etc.) were used. Standard curves from the serial dilution plasmid series reactions were calculated using the Biorad MyIQ software package. β-actin measurements were used to normalize for variation in amount and quality of RNA between samples. For each time point, three replicates were carried out and for each replicate, PCR efficiencies (E) were between 85 and 115% with correlation coefficient R2 values exceeding 0.98. Thus, expression values could be calculated as fold change in the target gene relative to the internal β-actin standard by using the following formula: fold change = E−ΔΔCT, where ΔΔCT = (Ct target gene – Ct β-actin).

Table 1.

Optimized quantitative real-time PCR primers and reaction conditions to measure IgD, IgM, IgZ/T, and β-actin gene expression in zebrafish.

Targeted
transcripts
Primers Primer
Location*
Amplicon
Size
Conditions
IgD
FWD
5’-GACACATTAGCCCATCAGCA-3’ BX510335;
43011-42992
156 bp 95°C 3 min; 30 cycles:
(95°C 10 sec; 58°C 10
sec; 72°C 3 sec)
IgD
RVS
5’-CTGGAGAGCAGCAAAAGGAT-3’ BX510335;
39712-39731
IgM
FWD
5’-GAAGCCTCCAATTCTGTTGG-3’ AY643751;
258-277
147 bp 95°C 3 min; 30 cycles:
(95°C 10 sec; 56°C 10
sec; 72°C 5 sec)
IgM
RVS
5’-CCGGGCTAAACACATGAAG-3’ AY643751;
404-386
IgZ/T
FWD
5’-GAACCAAACTCAGGGTTGGA-3’ AY643750;
300-281
152 bp 95°C 3 min; 30 cycles:
(95°C 10 sec; 56°C 10
sec; 72°C 2 sec)
IgZ/T
RVS
5’-CACCCAGCATTCTACAGCAA-3’ AY643750;
149-168
β-actin
FWD
5’-CCGTGACATCAAGGAGAAGCT-3’ AF057040;
680-700
201 bp 95°C 3 min; 30 cycles:
(95°C 10 sec; 58°C 10
sec; 72°C 10 sec)
β-actin
RVS
5’-TCGTGGATACCGCAAGATTCC-3’ AF057040;
880-860
*

Position of primers in the nucleotide sequence of corresponding GenBank Accession numbers.

Results and Discussion

Identification of a novel IgD splicing pattern in Zebrafish

Exon usage of the extensive IgD gene sequence in zebrafish was revealed as illustrated in Figure 1. The genomic configuration of the zebrafish IgH locus (Danilova et al. 2005) is depicted in the upper portion of the figure showing an array of VH gene segments upstream of tandem clusters of diversity (D), joining (J), and constant (C) gene regions. IgZ and IgM constant regions are both encoded by six exons whereas the IgD constant region is comprised of 17 IgD exons. To date, this constitutes the most extensive number of IgD exons found in any animal model. This exon assemblage includes an initial Cδ1 exon, four blocks of repeated (δ2-δ3-δ4) exons, exons Cδ5, Cδ6, Cδ7, and a single membrane exon (M). The first exon in the first block (Cδ2.1) carries a frameshift mutation (Danilova et al. 2005) which raised questions regarding IgD expression as the inclusion of Cδ2.1 during translation would result in a truncated IgD protein. As shown in Figure 1 we found that zebrafish bypass Cδ2.1 through splicing of the first IgM exon to Cδ3.1. This novel splicing pattern of IgD has yet to be observed in any other animal model.

Figure 1. Zebrafish IgD is a chimeric immunoglobulin with a novel splicing pattern.

Figure 1

The upper portion of diagram shows genomic configuration of the zebrafish IgH locus (Danilova et al. 2005). Given all V, D, J, and C gene segments are in the same transcriptional orientation, V(D)J rearrangement to the second cluster results in the deletion of the IgZ constant region (shown). The lower portion of the diagram depicts the exon usage of IgD as deduced by cloning IgD fragments from cDNA. V(D)J splicing to the first exon of the IgM constant region (Cμ1) revealed zebrafish IgD to be a chimeric immunoglobulin. In addition, Cμ1 splicing to the third IgD exon (Cδ3.1) bypasses the first two IgD exons, one of which contains a frameshift mutation (Cδ2.1). The presence of the frameshift mutation had raised questions as to how or if zebrafish IgD might be expressed as its inclusion would result in a truncated IgD protein. Here we show that IgD is expressed and that functional in-frame transcripts are produced by a non-standard splicing pattern which bypasses both Cδ1.1 and Cδ2.1. The bypass of the first and second IgD exons has yet to be found in any other animal model.

Comparative expression of IgH isotypes

Quantitative results of IgD, IgM, and IgZ expression for juvenile zebrafish are presented as a log of standard copy number after normalization to B-actin in Figure 2. These results suggest that IgD is expressed in low quantities during embryonic and juvenile stages and increases during development. Overall the expression pattern of IgM>IgZ>IgD is prevalent throughout zebrafish development with the copy number of IgM being several fold higher than that of IgD in adults (Table 2). Notably, IgH expression was absent in rag−/− fish thus validating the quantitative real time PCR parameters developed to measure IgH expression in this study. These findings also confirm the applicability of utilizing rag−/− fish as suitable negative controls in experiments aimed at measuring differences in IgH expression.

Figure 2. Quantitative expression profiles of IgD, IgM, and IgZ isotypes from zebrafish aged 2–129 days post fertilization.

Figure 2

Real time PCR results show an expression pattern of IgM>IgZ>IgD throughout early zebrafish development. The collective contribution of membrane and secreted forms of IgM, IgD, and IgZ are demonstrated as amplicons spanned internal exons thus amplifying both membrane and secreted forms. Results are presented as mean values of the log (relative copy number) after normalization to B-actin. Each sample was run in triplicate with a dilution series of plasmid cDNA to generate standard curves and appropriate non-template controls. Melting curves also indicated single specific melting peaks thus demonstrating that the protocols developed and optimized have amplification specificity for the targeted heavy chain isotype.

Table 2.

Quantitative and comparative expression of IgM, IgD, and IgZ/T heavy chain isotypes in adult zebrafish of various ages.

Developmental Stage
(months post fertilization)
IgM IgD IgZ/T
4.3 2.15E+03 5.25E+02 3.17E+01
7.1 3.83E+04 6.44E+01 3.29E+02
9.0 3.09E+03 1.02E+01 7.23E+01
10.8 4.68E+03 3.11E+02 4.46E+01
11.0 3.05E+02 1.56E+00 2.19E+01
17 7.16E+02 2.05E+00 3.37E+01
19 3.24E+02 1.23E+00 3.32E+01

Data are reported as fold increase of each isotype over negligible baseline expression of rag−/− zebrafish after normalization to B-actin. The Mann Whitney U test revealed significant differences between comparisons of IgM to IgD (p = 0.006) and IgM to IgZ/T (p = 0.004) across developmental stages. No significant differences were found between comparisons of IgD to IgZ/T expression at the time points measured. Collectively the results show IgM expression to be several fold higher than IgD or IgZ/T in zebrafish raised in standard laboratory conditions.

In conclusion, the results presented in this study demonstrate, that IgM, IgD, and IgZ/T are co-expressed over a wide range of developmental stages in the zebrafish. IgM exceeded IgD and IgZ expression at the vast majority of points indicating a possible heighted role for the IgM isotype throughout embryonic, juvenile, and adult stages of development. In addition, the expression of all three isotypes during early embryonic stages before the apparent up regulation or rag1 and rag2 (Zapata et al. 2006) suggests maternal IgH mRNA may be present and operative in zebrafish embryos. Overall, with this study a suite of qRT-PCR parameters were discerned and optimized for measuring levels of IgH gene expression in the zebrafish which are reproducible, specific, and highly sensitive. In addition, the results presented reveal a novel chimeric splice variant for IgD and provide a baseline measure for comparative age-dependent IgM, IgD, and IgZ/T expression in zebrafish raised under standard laboratory conditions. Further experiments such as gene knockout studies and disease challenge experiments will be necessary to understand the biological function of the different heavy chain isotypes in this emerging immunological model for biomedical research.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (LAS) and (AMZ), National Science Foundation (AMZ), College of Charleston Summer Undergraduate Research Program (FMM), and Howard Hughes Medical Institute Science Education Program (KER).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Vectors

qRT-PCR vectors used in this study have been deposited and will be made available to the scientific community through Addgene (www.addgene.org) a nonprofit public repository for archiving and distributing plasmid reagents between researchers.

References

  1. Arason GJ, Jorgensen GH, Ludviksson BR. Primary immunodeficiency and autoimmunity: lessons from human diseases. Scan J Immunol. 2010;71:317–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2010.02386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassett D, Currie PD. Identification of a zebrafish model of muscular dystrophy. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2004;31:537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckley RH. Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases. In: Paul WE, editor. Fundamental Immunology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Publishers; 2008. pp. 1523–1552. [Google Scholar]
  4. Danilova N, Bussmann J, Jekosch K, Steiner LA. The immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus in zebrafish: identification and expression of a previousy unknown isotype, immunoglobulin Z. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:295–302. doi: 10.1038/ni1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gambon-Deza R, Sanchez-Espinel C, Magadan-Mompo S. Presence of a unique IgT on the IgH locus in three-spined stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the very recent generation of a repertoire of VH genes. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo S. Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish? Genes Brain Behav. 2004;3:63–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1601-183x.2003.00053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hansen JD, Landis ED, Phillips RB. Discovery of a unique Ig heavy-chain isotype (IgT) in rainbow trout: implications for a distinctive B cell developmental pathway in teleost fish. PNAS. 2005;102:6919–6924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500027102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hegedus Z, Zakrzewska A, Agoston VC, Ordas A, Racz P, Mink M, Spaink HP, Meijer AH. Deep sequencing of the zebrafish transcriptome response to mycobacterium infection. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2918–2930. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hentschel DM, Park KM, Cilenti L, Zervos AS, Drummond I, Bonventre JV. Acute renal failure in zebrafish: a novel system to study a complex disease. Am. J. Physio. Renal Physiol. 2005;288:923–929. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00386.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsu E, Criscitiello MF. Diverse immunoglobulin light chain organizations in fish retain potential to revise B cell receptor specificities. J Immunol. 2006;177:2452–2462. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kinkel MD, Prince VE. On the diabetic menu: zebrafish as a model for pancreas development and function. Bioessays. 2009;31:139–152. doi: 10.1002/bies.200800123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lam SH, Chua HL, Gong Z, Lam TJ, Sin YM. Development and maturation of the immune system in zebrafish, Danio rerio: a gene expression profiling, in situ hybridization and immunological study. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004;28:9–28. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(03)00103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levy J, Espanol-Boren T, Thomas C, Fischer A, Toyo P, Bordigoni P, Resnick I, Fasth A, Baer M, Gomez L, Sanders EA, Tabone MD, Plantaz D, Etzioni A, Monafo V, Abinum M, Hammarstrom L, Abrahamsen T, Jones A, Finn A, Klemonla T, DeVries E, Sanal O, Peitsch MC, Notarangelo LD. Clinical spectrum of X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome. J Pediatr. 1997;131:47–54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mione MC, Trede NS. The zebrafish as a model for cancer. Dis Mod Mech. 2010;9:517–523. doi: 10.1242/dmm.004747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Notarangelo LD, Lanzi G, Peron S, Durandy A. Defects of class switch recombination. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:855–864. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Patton EE, Zon LI. Taking human cancer genes to the fish: a transgenic model of melanoma in zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2005;1:363–368. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2005.1.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodrigueq I, Novoa B, Figueras A. Immune response of zebrafish (Danio rerio) against a newly isolated bacterial pathogen Aeromonas hydrophilia. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008;25:239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryo S, Wijdeven RH, Tyagi A, Hermsen T, Kono T, Karunasagar I, Rombout JH, Sakai M, Verburg-van Kemenade BM, Savan R. Common carp have two subclasses of bonyfish specific antibody IgZ showing differential expression in response to infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:1183–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saunders HL, Magor BG. Cloning and expression of the AID gene in the channel catfish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004;28:657–663. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tobin DM, Vary JC, Ray JP, Walsh GS, Dunstan SJ, Bang ND, Hagge DA, Khadge S, King MC, Hawn TR, Moens CB, Ramakrishnan L. The Ita4h locus modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish and humans. Cell. 2010;140:717–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Traver D, Winzeler A, Stern HM, Mayhall EA, Langenau DM, Kutok JL, Look AT, Zon LI. Effects of lethal irradiation in zebrafish and rescue by hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;104:1298–1305. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Walters KB, Green JM, Surfus JC, Yoo SK, Huttenlocher A. Live imaging of neutrophil motility in a zebrafish model of WHIM syndrome. Blood. 2010;116:2803–2811. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book. Eugene: University of Oregon Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wienholds E, Schulte-Merker S, Walderich B, Plasterk RH. Target-selected inactivation of the zebrafish rag1 gene. Science. 2002;297:99–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1071762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zapata A, Diez B, Cejalvo T, Gutierrez-de Frais C, Cortes A. Ontogeny of the immune system of fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006;20:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zimmerman AM, Yeo G, Howe K, Maddox BJ, Steiner LA. Immunoglobulin light chain (IgL) genes in zebrafish: genomic configurations and inversional rearrangements between (Vl-Jl-Cl) gene clusters. Dev and Comp Immunol. 2008;32:421–434. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2007.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES