Abstract
We recently reported autosomal recessive fetal-onset neuroaxonal dystrophy (FNAD) in a large family of dogs that is not caused by mutation in the PLA2G6 locus (2010 J Comp Neurol 518:3771–3784). Here we report a genome-wide linkage analysis using 333 microsatellite markers to map canine FNAD to the telomeric end of chromosome 2. The interval of zero recombination was refined by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype analysis to ~ 200 kb, and the included genes were sequenced. We found a homozygous 3-nucleotide deletion in exon 13 of mitofusin 2 (MFN2), predicting loss of a glutamate residue at position 539 in the protein of affected dogs. RT-PCR demonstrated near normal expression of the mutant mRNA, but MFN2 expression was undetectable to very low on western blots of affected dog brainstem, cerebrum, kidney, and cultured fibroblasts and by immunohistochemistry on brainstem sections. MFN2 is a multifunctional, membrane-bound GTPase of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum most commonly associated with human Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A2. The canine disorder extends the range of MFN2-associated phenotypes and suggests MFN2 as a candidate gene for rare cases of human FNAD.
Keywords: Neuroaxonal dystrophy, mitofusin 2, linkage analysis, animal model, disease gene
INTRODUCTION
Neuroaxonal dystrophy (NAD) is a diagnostically nonspecific, but histologically distinct neurodegenerative pathology of the central and/or peripheral nervous system characterized by local swellings (spheroids) and atrophy of axons. One of the childhood disorders in which NAD occurs as the primary pathology is recessive infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD; OMIM #256600; a.k.a. Seitelberger disease), most often caused by mutation of a gene encoding calcium-independent, group VI phospholipase A2 (PLA2G6) [1, 2]. Onset of signs is typically between 6 and 18 months of age and follows a progressive course of cognitive and motor regression, hypotonia, and progressive paraplegia. Patients characteristically exhibit cerebellar and optic atrophy and spheroids in CNS and peripheral nerve axons [3–6]. Some INAD patients also accumulate iron in the globus pallidus and/or substantia nigra. Among atypical cases of INAD are reports of disease for which the genetic etiology is unknown but that indicate onset of pathology during fetal life (so-called connatal INAD). These are a unique group in which patients exhibit early, severe motor dysfunction causing fetal akinesia and the resulting constellation of morphologic and developmental abnormalities [7–9]. In the most recent of these reports, PLA2G6 mutation was largely excluded by sequencing the exons and splice junctions [9].
Recently we described autosomal recessive, fetal-onset neuroaxonal dystrophy (FNAD) causing late-gestational fetal akinesia, multiple joint fixation, and pulmonary hypoplasia in a large family of dogs [10] that mimics the connatal human phenotype. Affected fetuses exhibited swollen axons/spheroids throughout the extrapyramidal motor system of brainstem, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves and died at birth due to respiratory failure. They also exhibited cerebellar hypoplasia with degeneration of Purkinje cells and neurons of deep cerebellar nuclei. There was no accumulation of brain iron. The histopathologic findings and electron microscopic features of spheroids were similar to those of human INAD, but genetic markers flanking canine PLA2G6 locus did not segregate with the disorder. Lacking functional candidate genes, we undertook and now report results of a genome-wide scan for linkage and subsequent fine-mapping of the canine FNAD locus. We demonstrate a unique mutation of mitofusin 2 (MFN2) in affected dogs that abrogates MFN2 expression in brainstem and other tissues. MFN2 is a well known disease gene in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A (CMT2A; OMIM #609260), but our findings suggest that MFN2 mutations may also underlie some human cases of connatal INAD.
METHODS
Animals
Dogs used in this study were members of a breeding colony maintained initially at University of Pennsylvania and later at Michigan State University. All dogs were handled according to the principles outlined in the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The respective Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees approved all protocols for routine care, breeding and whelping, and euthanasia. Dogs were of a large outbred family in which FNAD segregated as a fully penetrant, simple autosomal recessive trait (Fig. 1a). We determined disease status at birth by observation of a characteristic constellation of gross abnormalities, including joint contractures, scoliosis, cerebellar hypoplasia, and respiratory failure. Blood or tissue samples were stored frozen at −80° C for DNA isolation.
Markers and genotyping
We isolated DNA and performed an initial genome-wide scan using 152 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and DNA samples from a subpedigree of 172 dogs using previously described methods [12]. The Mammalian Genotyping Service of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, (Marshfield, WI) conducted a second genome-wide scan using a partially overlapping set of 249 SSR markers, 181 DNA samples, and similar methods. Both scans together assessed 329 previously published markers and 4 new SSR markers. Table 1 shows IDs, coordinates, and amplifying primers of 4 new SSR markers first developed for this study. We fine-mapped the linked region using samples from a subpedigree to assess segregation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles. We determined novel SNP sites (Table 1) by sequencing PCR products amplified from genomic DNA of obligate carrier dogs, as described [12].
Table 1.
Marker ID | CFA2 location* | Polymorphism Details § | Forward (F) and reverse (R) primers 5′ -> 3′ |
---|---|---|---|
C02p027 | 85,058,262 | SSR - (CTTTT)15 | F- CACCGCCCCGTTTGACAGG R- CTCGCCAGCCCCCACACCAC |
0258† | 86,044,331 | SSR - (AC)18 | F- CTGAGAGGCACAGCCAACAC R- GCTCCTTCTTCGACGTGCTT |
C02p024 | 87,685,847 | SSR - (CA)20 | F- CCTTGGGGCCACATGACTTCTACC R- CTTTATTTCTGCGTGCCCTTGTGC |
C02p014 | 88,241,450 | SSR - (CA)22 | F- TCCCTGAATCCTGAGCAAAAT R- GCGGCCAGGATGTGTCAAAATA |
C02ps501 | 86,795,606 | SNP - A/G, in VPS13D 3′ UTR, Hha I digest | F- CACCCGCCCACGCTCTACACTCTG R- ACCCCTCACCCCTCACCCCTTACG |
C02ps502 | 87,029,973 | SNP - C/T, in TNFSRF1B intron | F- GGTGGGGCCGGCAGGTATC R- TAGCAGGGGCCGTGGTAAGAGTTT |
C02ps503 | 87,039,470 | SNP - A/C, centromeric of TNSRSF8 | F- AACGGGGGACGGAGCCTTCTGC R- GCCGCCGCCTGTGATGTGGTCT |
C02ms504 | 87,300,627 | SNP - C/T, in CLCN6 intron, Msp I digest | F- AGGTGGCTGCAAGCAGGAGGAAC R- GTGGGTGTTGGGTGAAACGGTGA |
location of beginning of simple sequence repeat or SNP, based on CanFam2 dog genome assembly
SSR-simple sequence repeat; SNP-single nucleotide polymorphism; subscript indicates copy number in CanFam2 dog genome assembly
see reference [56]
Segregation of SNP alleles was determined by sequencing or by inference from appropriate restriction enzyme digests of PCR products.
Genetic linkage analysis
We computed LOD scores with Superlink [13]. We modeled the disease as a fully penetrant autosomal recessive trait, disease allele frequency as 0.01, and allele frequencies for each marker as equal. For multipoint analysis, we estimated inter-marker recombination fractions from the FNAD pedigree and its genotypes. We show results obtained in a single 170-dog subpedigree, although other subpedigrees were used for analysis in earlier stages of the project. We used e-PCR [14] to identify marker positions, and TBLASTN [15, 16] and MegaBLAST [17] to find matches for human exons on the dog sequence assemblies CanFam1 [18] and CanFam2 [19].
Gene sequencing
We sequenced the coding regions of genes within the critical interval, either by sequencing each exon with flanking intron-exon boundaries amplified from genomic DNA or by sequencing overlapping segments of cDNA produced by reverse transcription (RT) coupled PCR of RNA isolated from frozen brainstem, as described [20]. Contigs were assembled and aligned with orthologous sequences of other species using the Lasergene® software package (DNAstar®, Inc., Madison, WI). cDNA sequences were submitted to GenBank®.
MFN2 mutation detection and expression analysis
We detected mutant and normal MFN2 alleles in genomic DNA by Mnl I digestion of a 264 bp PCR product amplified using primers 5′-GACGTGGCTTCTCCTCATCTCC-3′ and 5′-CACTGCTTGCCTGGTCATTGTAG-3′. We assessed expression of MFN2 mRNA by RT-PCR of RNA isolated from brainstem of MFN2+/+, MFN2+/FNAD, and MFNFNAD/FNAD littermates. RT reactions were primed with oligo-dT, and PCR primers were 5′-CAGCAGGACATGATAGATGGTTTGAA-3′ (c.1480–1505, overlapping the exon 12/13 boundary) and 5′-ACAACGAGAATGCCCATGGAGGT-3′ (c.1840–1862, in exon 14). We discriminated allele-specific mRNA expression by Mnl I digestion of the 383 bp RT-PCR products.
For western blots, fresh tissue was homogenized and separated into fractions of total homogenate, mitochondria, microsomes (disrupted endoplasmic reticulum vesicles), and cytoplasm by differential centrifugation, as previously described [21]. We determined total protein concentrations by the Bradford method [22] and assessed MFN2 and control protein expression in each fraction on western blots, prepared as previously described [23]. Rabbit polyclonal antibody to VDAC/porin (ab15895; 40 ng/mL working concentration), chicken polyclonal antibody to calreticulin (ab14234; 330 ng/mL), affinity-purified chicken polyclonal antibody to mouse mitofusin 1 (MFN1) (ab60939; 1.5 μg/mL), and mouse monoclonal antibodies to MFN2 (ab56889; 3 μg/mL) and to α-tubulin (ab28037; 500 ng/mL) were obtained from Abcam, Inc. (Cambridge, MA). The anti-MFN2 antibody was raised against a 90-residue recombinant peptide representing human MFN2 residues 661–757, differing from the dog sequence at only 2 positions, and detected an 86 kDa protein on western blots of HeLa cell lysate (manufacturer’s fact sheet). The anti-MFN1 antibody was raised against a fusion protein containing residues 348–579 of mouse MFN1, a region 94% identical to dog MFN1 but only 52% identical to dog MFN2, and detected an 84 kDa protein on western blots of mouse embryonic fibroblast lysates. Specificity was confirmed using lysates of cells derived from MFN1-null, MFN2-null, and double null embryos (manufacturer’s fact sheet). Horse radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugates of rabbit anti-chicken IgY (A9792; diluted 1:180,000), goat anti-rabbit IgG (A9169; diluted 1:80,000), and rabbit anti-mouse IgG (A9044; diluted 1:80,000) were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). We detected immunocrossreactive proteins by chemiluminescent reaction (Western Lightning Detection Kit, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA) on blots exposed to film.
We performed immunohistochemistry on formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples using the monoclonal anti-MFN2 (1:250 dilution) and polyclonal chicken anti-MFN1 antibodies (1:100 dilution) described above. Secondary antibodies were biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) and biotinylated donkey anti-chicken IgY (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA), respectively. We detected antibody binding by sequential incubation of slides in avidin-peroxidase (R.T.U. peroxidase reagent) and NovaRED™ peroxidase substrate as chromogen, both from Vector Laboratories, Inc. Images were acquired on a Nikon Eclipse 90i® microscope with a digital imaging camera. There was no image processing other than global adjustment of brightness and/or contrast.
RESULTS
Genome-wide linkage studies using a total of 329 previously published microsatellite markers failed to yield a statistically significant LOD score for FNAD so we further examined chromosome telomeres. The most telomeric marker used on CFA2 was FH2062, located 8.8 Mb from the telomere. Its peak LOD score was 1.64 at a recombination fraction (θ) of 0.29 (Table 2), which was the highest LOD score achieved by the most extreme marker on any chromosome. We identified four more SSRs, designated C02p027, 0258, C02p024, C02p014, between FH2062 and the telomere, and each of these achieved a LOD score of >15. In multipoint analysis using the four new markers, the peak LOD score for placing the gene between C02p027 and C02p024 was 36.1 and was >5 LOD units better than any other placement. FH2062 and C02p027 are separated by only 5.4 Mb, but the recombination fraction between them in this pedigree was 0.20. The high rate of recombination often encountered near chromosome ends [24] explained our failure to identify the disease locus using the previously established dog linkage markers.
Table 2.
Marker | Peak LOD score | Recombination fraction (θ) |
---|---|---|
AHT111 | 2.60 | 0.28 |
FH2062 | 1.64 | 0.29 |
C02p027 | 20.56 | 0.09 |
0258 | 15.24 | 0.03 |
CO2ps502 | 16.13 | 0.01 |
MFN2del | 39.90 | 0.00 |
rs22798447 | 20.93 | 0.01 |
rs22793152 | 22.19 | 0.00 |
C02p024 | 27.77 | 0.01 |
C02p014 | 21.74 | 0.02 |
The identified segment of CFA2 corresponds to the telomeric end of the short arm of human chromosome 1 (HSA1p). Comparative sequence analysis using BLAT [25] verified the locations of canine orthologs of HSA1p genes on CanFam1 [18] and CanFam2 [19]. Orthologous genes occurred in consistent, but opposite order in the two species, except that the dog ortholog of VPS13D appeared partially duplicated on CFA9, and there is an ~98 kb gap (CFA2:86.92–87.02 Mb) in the CanFam2 assembly.
Known and novel SNPs in or near several positional candidate genes on CFA2 were genotyped in dogs that had imperfect segregation of alleles in the nearest microsatellites and in some of their first-degree relatives. Three informative SNPs (C02ps502, rs22798447, and rs22793152) and SSRs flanking the interval were used as markers in single and multipoint linkage analysis (Tables 2 and 3). In multipoint analysis using various combinations of two or three markers at a time and a LOD score difference threshold of 3.0, we assessed the likelihood that the disease locus was to one side or the other or between marker pairs (Table 3). It followed statistically that the FNAD gene was between the markers in TNFRSF1B and KIAA2013. Furthermore, haplotype analysis (Fig. 1b) identified interval-defining recombination events at C02ps503 and rs22798447, telomeric of TNFRSF1B and in KIAA2013 intron 2, respectively, thereby narrowing the critical interval to ~ 200 kb and abrogating concern about a potential VPS13D duplication.
Table 3.
Marker A | Marker B | Marker C | Inferred position of FNAD gene | Justifying LOD Score Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|
AHT111 | neff0258 | Telomeric of AHT111 | 10.49 | |
AHT111 | C02p027 | Telomeric of C02p027 | 5.41 | |
FH2062 | C02p027 | Telomeric of C02p027 | 5.08 | |
FH2062 | C02p024 | Telomeric of FH2062 | 23.17 | |
C02p027 | C02ps502 | Telomeric of C02p027 | 8.07 | |
C02p027 | rs22798447 | Telomeric of C02p027 | 12.21 | |
C02p027 | C02p024 | Between markers | 3.07 | |
C02p027 | C02p014 | Between markers | 3.28 | |
neff0258 | rs22798447 | Telomeric of 0258 | 3.39 | |
C02ps502 | C02p024 | Telomeric of C02ps502 | 3.93 | |
C02ps502 | C02p014 | Between markers | 3.17 | |
C02ps502 | rs22798447 | C02p014 | Centromeric of rs22798447 | 3.19 |
There are 4 complete gene sequences in the human and canine genomes between TNFRSF1B and KIAA2013 (Fig. 1c). We sequenced full coding regions of PLOD1, MIIP, and MFN2 (GenBank® accession nos. GQ892932–GQ892934, respectively) in cDNA amplified from brainstem RNA of an affected pup and a heterozygous littermate. The coding regions of TNFRSF8 and KIAA2013 that were within the critical interval were sequenced by amplifying exons and flanking splice sites from genomic DNA. Single nucleotide sequence variations were observed in each gene except KIAA2013. In MIIP, c.G241A and c.G290A predicted amino acid changes p.G81S and p.R97H, respectively, and c.T672C predicted no change. In PLOD1, c.T917G and c.G929A predicted amino acid substitutions p.L306R and p.R310H, respectively, and c.C865T predicted no change. In TNFRSF8, the only variation found was the protein synonymous SNP rs22781397.
In MFN2, there were 5 translationally silent sequence variations (c.T274C, c.A336G, c.T720C, c.G1053A, and c.C1252A) and 3 differences from the published dog genome sequence in the 3′ untranslated region (c.A2331T, c.T2368C, and c.A2465G). Most notably, there was a homozygous 3 bp deletion (c.1617_1619delGGA) in the affected pup cDNA sequence (confirmed in genomic DNA) that predicted an in-frame loss of a single glutamate residue (p.E539del). The deleted nucleotides are among a 2-unit trinucleotide repeat (GGAGGA) sequence as well as a longer symmetric element (CAGGAGGAC), which suggests that the mechanism of deletion may be DNA replication slippage [26, 27]. E539 is situated in a region of high conservation (the R5 region of conservation in Fig. 1 of [28]) among vertebrate and invertebrate MFN2 sequences, as well as those of the paralogue MFN1 (Fig. 1c). The deletion is between and somewhat removed from the more N-terminal heptad repeat (HR; aa 408–433) and the transmembrane (TM; aa 614–646) domains (Fig. 1d). The 3 bp deletion also obliterated an Mnl I restriction endonuclease recognition site that was used to genotype 172 dogs of the FNAD pedigree (Fig. 1e, lanes 1–3). All affected dogs were homozygous for loss of the cut site, and all obligate FNAD carriers were heterozygous. As a linkage marker, the MFN2 mutation obtained a LOD score of 39.9 at θ = 0.0 (Table 2).
We considered the predicted amino acid substitutions in PLOD1 and MIIP as unlikely to be pathogenic because none of them was a highly conserved residue among mammals. Therefore, we investigated the effect of the MFN2 deletion mutation on gene expression. To avoid confounding effects of brainstem pathology present in affected pups, allele-specific mRNA expression was assessed in histologically normal, heterozygote tissue as well as in homozygous-normal and affected tissue. As shown in lanes 4–6 of Fig. 1e, comparable amounts of MFN2 RT-PCR product were amplified from brainstem RNA of normal, carrier, and affected pups, and fragments produced by Mnl I digestion of the amplification products correlated with the animals’ genotypes, thus indicating the MFN2 mutation had little effect on steady-state MFN2 mRNA levels.
MFN2 protein expression was assessed by western blot in subcellular fractions of cerebrum, brainstem, kidney, and fibroblasts, representing CNS tissue that demonstrated no lesions or abundant neuroaxonal dystrophy, non-CNS tissue, and cultured primary cells, respectively. MFN2 was undetectable in any affected pup brainstem fraction, whereas organelle-specific loading controls were comparable in normal and affected littermate tissue (Fig. 1f). The mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum loading controls were enriched in their respective fractions. Increased protein loading and longer film exposure did not reveal MFN2 in any affected pup brainstem fraction (not shown). We found none of the four proteins examined in the cytosolic (post-microsomal) fractions, indicating that all are normally membrane associated. We did not readily detect MFN2 on western blots of affected pup cerebrum, kidney or cultured primary fibroblasts (Fig. 1g), indicating that the loss of MFN2 in brainstem was not due to the extensive neuropathology in that tissue. By over exposure of blots loaded with 3 fold more protein/lane (not shown), we observed faint, normally migrating bands of MFN2 immunoreactivity in affected pup kidney total homogenate and microsomal fractions, but not in the mitochondrial or cytosolic fractions, nor in the other tissues. Thereby, we estimated steady-state expression of MFN2 in affected pup kidney fractions at levels 30–60 fold less than in the same fractions of normal littermate tissue. These results demonstrate that failure to detect the affected dog MFN2 in mitochondrial or microsomal fractions was likely due to protein instability rather than mistargeting.
Immunohistochemistry of normal pup brainstem sections demonstrated robust granular cytoplasmic staining of MFN2 in cerebellar Purkinje cells (Fig. 2b), deep cerebellar nuclei, and most large neurons in identified nuclei (Fig. 2f) or scattered in the myelencephalic tegmentum. There were many granules of staining throughout the neuropil, either isolated or in recognizable strands, that were most likely within neurites and/or glial cell processes. In contrast, MFN1 staining in normal pups, while robust in a few isolated cells throughout the brainstem (Fig. 2a and 2e), was minimal or absent from most Purkinje cells, those of the deep nuclei, the caudal olives, the nucleus of the 7th cranial nerve, and the tegmental giant cells. Little or no MFN1 staining was observed in the neuropil. There was no MFN2 staining in FNAD pup Purkinje cells, deep nuclei, or other parts of the brainstem (Fig. 2d and 2h). Distribution of MFN1 staining in the affected pups was similar to that in normal pup brainstem (Fig. 2c and 2g). Sporadic cells showed robust staining while others in the same nuclei or layers showed much fainter staining. There was never staining of either MFN1 or MFN2 in the dystrophic axons or spheroids (Fig. 2g and 2h).
DISCUSSION
Using a genetic linkage-based approach and gene expression analysis, we demonstrated that a novel homozygous mutation of the MFN2 gene causes lethal, autosomal recessive FNAD in dogs [10]. Familial NAD has been described in dogs previously [29–35], but none have been of obviously fetal-onset, nor has a canine NAD-causing mutation been determined before. An in-frame, 3-nucleotide deletion in MFN2 predicts loss of a single highly conserved residue (E539). The genetic lesion reduced immunodetectable MFN2 protein to nil in CNS and very low in other tissues, indicating that the disease pathology is due to loss of one or more MFN2-mediated functions. Loss of E539 most likely destabilizes the protein through misfolding or loss of a crucial protein-protein interaction. Altered organellar targeting remains a possibility, but there was no evidence in this study to support such a mechanism.
Canine FNAD is characterized by segmental swellings of axons with intact myelin sheaths throughout the brainstem extrapyramidal system, spinal cord and peripheral nerves. Axonal swellings of affected pups were filled with membrane bound fragments of variably degenerated mitochondria and other tubulomembranous material embedded in disorganized whorls of neurofilaments [10]. This pathology is similar to that in human patients exhibiting INAD caused by PLA2G6 mutations or neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA1; a.k.a. PKAN; OMIM # 234200) caused by mutations of mitochondrial pantothenate kinase (PANK2). The same lesions were observed in mouse Pla2g6 knockout models [36–38] but not in a Pank2 knockout [39, 40], most likely because PANK2 only obtained mitochondrial targeting during primate evolution [41]. The pathophenotypic overlap of NBIA1 and INAD (a.k.a. NBIA2A) has caused some to hypothesize that PLA2G6 and PANK2 mutations each lead to lipid dyshomeostasis affecting mitochondrial function [6]. Finding that an MFN2 mutation can cause similar neuronal lesions may emphasize the aspect of mitochondrial dysfunction in this hypothesis, though it remains hampered by incomplete understanding of the multiple functions of proteins encoded by these three disease-associated genes.
The canine FNAD phenotype is unique among species expressing known MFN2 mutations. More than 70 distinct MFN2 mutations in humans have been associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2A2 (CMT2A2; OMIM #609260) and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy (HMSN VI or CMT6; OMIM #601152) according to the collections at the Inherited Peripheral Neuropathies Mutation Database (http://www.molgen.ua.ac.be/cmtmutations/Mutations/Default.cfm) and the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/all.php), both accessed on March 22, 2011. Both disorders are axonal type peripheral neuropathies of variable age onset and predominantly autosomal dominant inheritance. NAD is not a pathologic feature described in either of these human disorders or in mouse models of Mfn2 deficiency by gene knockout or mutant Mfn2 transgene overexpression. Almost all MFN2 mutations in humans are missense changes clustered in regions including and flanking the GTPase and heptad-repeat domains (Fig. 1d). No single-residue mutation until now has been described in the interval surrounding E539. Hence, the canine FNAD phenotype may be mutation-specific, rather than species-specific. Recently, a disease-associated SNP was identified in Tyrolean grey cattle that alters a putative exonic splice enhancer in MFN2 exon 20, although there was no functional proof of disease causation [42]. The affected cattle exhibited neurodegeneration in peripheral nerve, spinal cord and brainstem, but NAD was not reported.
MFN1 and MFN2 are paralogous outer membrane-anchored proteins that mediate tethering in the initial step of mitochondrial fusion [43]. Pre-fusion tethering of mitochondria occurs via homotypic and heterotypic interactions of the 2 proteins. MFN1 and MFN2 have similar protein domain structures and overlapping but not identical tissue and subcellular expression profiles, protein-binding partners, and functions [44–51; reviewed in 51]. Importantly, while MFN1 and MFN2 can each at least partially complement the fusion function of the other when expressed in the same cells [52], there are at least two potentially important functional differences unrelated to mitochondrial fusion. In addition to mitochondria, MFN2 is also expressed in the ER membrane cytosolic leaflet mediating ER-mitochondrial contacts and is required for normal ER morphology and function [53], including supply of membrane lipids for autophagosomes [54]. MFN2 has also been identified in a complex that tethers mitochondria to microtubule-based molecular motors for axonal transport [55].
A remarkable aspect of the pattern of neuronal pathology in canine FNAD, particularly in the brain stem, is its specificity [10]. Specific cell types and nuclei are extensively abnormal while adjacent cells or nuclei are not. For instance, Purkinje cells, neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei, the red nuclei, the caudal olivary nuclei, the myelencephalic tegmental giant cells, and the nuclei of the 5th and 7th cranial nerves show severe neuronal degeneration and/or axonal swelling, while the 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 12th cranial nerve nuclei and the rostral olivary nuclei are essentially normal. In this study the neurons and nuclei of FNAD pup brainstem showing the least MFN1 staining were those exhibiting the most extensive NAD and neuronal degeneration. This is compatible with the idea that complementation by MFN1 maintains sufficient neuronal homeostasis when a function(s) is lost due to MFN2 deficiency, a hypothesis advanced to explain observations of seemingly normal post-implantation development but post-natal cerebellar Purkinje cell degeneration in conditional Mfn2−/− knockout mice [50]. Those authors further demonstrated that mouse Purkinje cells express abundant Mfn2, but little or no Mfn1 mRNA, similar to our findings by immunohistochemistry in newborn dogs. While this provides a plausible basis for cell-type specific degeneration of Purkinje cells and other brainstem neurons, it may be premature to conclude that mitochondrial fusion is the only neuron-preserving function provided by MFN1 to complement MFN2 deficiency. It is evident, however, that sufficient mitofusin function, considered broadly, is maintained in crucial tissues of homozygous mutant dog embryos to support implantation and near-normal development until late in gestation. The survival of the FNAD fetus could be due to either MFN1 complementation or to low-level and perhaps tissue-specific expression of the mutant MFN2, especially earlier than the last half of the third trimester which we have not yet examined.
Dominant inheritance of the majority of human CMT2A2 mutations in MFN2 suggests they cause disease by gain-of-function, dominant-negative effects, or haploinsufficiency. In contrast, recessive inheritance of the dog disorder indicates that theirs is a loss-of-function allele. Determining the mechanism by which the E539del MFN2 mutation causes dystrophy and degeneration in dogs may reveal a new aspect of neuroaxonal development and homeostasis.
Acknowledgments
FUNDING: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [NS41989, RR02512 and contract HV48141]; the Purebred Dog Endowment Fund, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University; and in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NLM. Author RAA was supported by a Department of Pathology Scholarship for Basic Medical Sciences (KU-984) from the Kuwait University Faculty of Medicine.
References
- 1.Khateeb S, Flusser H, Ofir R, Shelef I, Narkis G, Vardi G, Shorer Z, Levy R, Galil A, Elbedour K, Birk OS. PLA2G6 mutation underlies infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:942–948. doi: 10.1086/508572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morgan NV, Westaway SK, Morton JEV, et al. PLA2G6, encoding a phospholipase A2, is mutated in neurodegenerative disorders with high brain iron. Nat Genet. 2006;38:752–754. doi: 10.1038/ng1826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aicardi J, Castelein P. Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy. Brain. 1979;102:727–748. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.4.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kurian MA, Morgan NV, MacPherson L, et al. Phenotypic spectrum of neurodegeneration associated with mutations in the PLA2G6 gene (PLAN) Neurology. 2008;70:1623–1629. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000310986.48286.8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gregory A, Westaway SK, Holm IE, et al. Neurodegeneration associated with genetic defects in phospholipase A2. Neurology. 2008;71:1402–1409. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000327094.67726.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gregory A, Polster BJ, Hayflick SJ. Clinical and genetic delineation of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. J Med Genet. 2009;46:73–80. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.061929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jennekens FGI, Barth PG, Fleury P, Veldman H, Keuning JF, Westdorp J. Axonal dystrophy in a case of connatal thalamic and brain stem degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;64:68–71. doi: 10.1007/BF00695608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chow G, Padfield CJH. A case of infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy-connatal Seitelberger disease. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:418–420. doi: 10.1177/0883073807308710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rakheja D, Uddin N, Mitui M, Cope-Yokoyama S, Hogan RN, Burns DK. Fetal akinesia deformation sequence and neuroaxonal dystrophy without PLA2G6 mutation. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2010;13:492–496. doi: 10.2350/10-01-0782-CR.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fyfe JC, Al-Tamimi RA, Castellani RJ, Rosenstein D, Goldowitz D, Henthorn PS. Inherited neuroaxonal dystrophy in dogs causing lethal, fetal-onset motor system dysfunction and cerebellar hypoplasia. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:3771–3784. doi: 10.1002/cne.22423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.He Q, Fyfe JC, Schäffer AA, Kilkenney A, Werner P, Kirkness EF, Henthorn PS. Canine Imerslund-Gräsbeck syndrome maps to a region orthologous to HSA14q. Mamm Genome. 2003;14:758–764. doi: 10.1007/s00335-003-2280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fishelson M, Geiger D. Exact genetic linkage computations for general pedigrees. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(Suppl 1):S189–198. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schuler GD. Sequence mapping by electronic PCR. Genome Res. 1997;7:541–550. doi: 10.1101/gr.7.5.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST—a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gertz EM, Yu Y-K, Agarwala R, Schäffer AA, Altschul SF. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol. 2006;4:41. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000;7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kirkness EF, Bafna V, Halpern AL, Levy S, Remington K, Rusch DB, Delcher AL, Pop M, Wang W, Fraser CM, Venter JC. The dog genome: Survey sequencing and comparative analysis. Science. 2003;301:1898–903. doi: 10.1126/science.1086432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005;438:803–819. doi: 10.1038/nature04338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gregory BL, Shelton GD, Bali DS, Chen Y-T, Fyfe JC. Glycogen storage disease type IIIa in curly-coated retrievers. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:40–46. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2007)21[40:gsdtii]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sujkovic E, Mileusnic R, Fry JP. Metabolism of neuroactive steroids in day old chick brain. J Neurochem. 2009;109:348–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu D, Fyfe JC. Cubilin expression and posttranslational modification in the canine gastrointestinal tract. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:G748–756. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2000.279.4.G748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, et al. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002;31:241–247. doi: 10.1038/ng917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kent WJ. BLAT - the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002;12:656–664. doi: 10.1101/gr.229202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Krawczak M, Cooper DN. Gene deletions causing human genetic disease: mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of the local DNA sequence environment. Hum Genet. 1991;86:425–441. doi: 10.1007/BF00194629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ball EV, Stenson PD, Abeysinghe SS, Krawczak M, Cooper DN, Chuzhanova NA. Microdeletions and microinsertions causing human genetic disease: Common mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of local DNA sequence complexity. Hum Mutat. 2005;26:205–213. doi: 10.1002/humu.20212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Honda S, Aihara T, Hontani M, Okubo K, Hirose S. Mutational analysis of action of mitochondrial fusion factor mitofusin-2. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3153–3161. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cork LC, Troncoso JC, Price DL, Stanley EF, Griffin JW. Canine neuroaxonal dystrophy. J Neuropathol Exper Neurol. 1983;42:286–296. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198305000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Griffiths IR, Duncan ID. The central nervous system in canine giant axon neuropathy. Acta Neuropathol. 1979;46:169–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00690839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sacre BJ, Cummings JF, de Lahunta A. Neuroaxonal dystrophy in a Jack Russell terrier pup resembling human infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy. Cornell Vet. 1993;83:133–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Diaz JV, Duque C, Geisel R. Neuroaxonal dystrophy in dogs: Case report in 2 litters of papillon puppies. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:531–534. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2007)21[531:ndidcr]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jäderlund KH, Örvind E, Johnsson E, Matiasek K, Hahn CN, Malm S, Hedhammar Å. A neurologic syndrome in golden retrievers presenting as a sensory ataxic neuropathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:1307–1315. doi: 10.1892/07-005.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nibe K, Kita C, Morozumi M, Awamura Y, Tamura S, Okuno S, Kobayashi T, Uchida K. Clinicopathological feature of canine neuroaxonal dystrophy and cerebellar cortical abiotrophy in papillon and papillon-related dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69:1047–1052. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nibe K, Nakayama H, Uchida K. Immunohistochemical features of dystrophic axons in papillon dogs with neuroaxonal dystrophy. Vet Pathol. 2009;46:474–483. doi: 10.1354/vp.08-VP-0156-U-FL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shinzawa K, Sumi H, Ikawa M, Matsuoka Y, Okabe M, Sakoda S, Tsujimoto Y. Neuroaxonal dystrophy caused by group VIA phospholipase A2 deficiency in mice: a model of human neurodegenerative disease. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2212–2220. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4354-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Malik I, Turk J, Mancuso DJ, Montier L, Wohltmann M, Wozniak DF, Schmidt RE, Gross RW, Kotzbauer PT. Disrupted membrane homeostatis and accumulation of ubiquinated proteins in a mouse model of infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy caused by PLA2G6 mutations. Am J Pathol. 2008;172:406–416. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wada H, Yasuda T, Miura I, Watabe K, Sawa C, Kamijuku H, Kojo S, Taniguchi M, Nishino I, Wakana S, Yoshida H, Seino K. Establishment of an improved mouse model for infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy that shows early disease onset and bears a point mutation in Pla2g6. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:2257–2263. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuo Y-M, Duncan JL, Westaway SK, Yang H, Nune G, Xu EY, Hayflick SJ, Gitschier J. Deficiency of pantothenate kinase 2 (Pank2) in mice leads to retinal degeneration and azoospermia. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:49–57. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kuo YM, Hayflick SJ, Gitschier J. Deprivation of pantothenic acid elicits a movement disorder and azoospermia in a mouse model of pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30:310–317. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0560-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leonardi R, Zhang Y-M, Lykidis A, Rock CO, Jackowski S. Localization and regulation of mouse pantothenate kinase 2. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:4639–4644. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Drögemüller C, Reichart U, Seuberlich T, et al. An unusual splice defect in the mitofusin 2 gene (MFN2) is associated with degenerative axonopathy in Tyrolean grey cattle. PloS One. 2011;6:e18931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Meeusen SL, Nunnari J. How mitochondria fuse. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bach D, Pich S, Soriano FX, et al. Mitofusin-2 determines mitochondrial network architecture and mitochondrial metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:17190–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212754200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Santel A, Frank S, Gaume B, Herrier M, Youle RJ, Fuller MT. Mitofusin-1 protein is a generally expressed mediator of mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2763–2774. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ishihara N, Eura Y, Mihara K. Mitofusin 1 and 2 play distinct roles in mitochondrial fusion reactions via GTPase activity. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:6535–6546. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nakamura N, Kimura Y, Tokuda M, Honda S, Hirose S. MARCH-V is a novel mitofusin 2- and Drp1-binding protein able to change mitochondrial morphology. EMBO Reports. 2006;7:1019–1022. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hájek P, Chomyn A, Attardi G. Identification of a novel mitochondrial complex containing mitofusin 2 and stomatin-like protein 2. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5670–5681. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608168200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:189–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen H, McCaffery JM, Chan DC. Mitochondrial fusion protects against neurodegeneration in the cerebellum. Cell. 2007;130:548–562. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liesa M, Palacín M, Zorzano A. Mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:799–845. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Detmer SA, Chan DC. Complementation between mouse Mfn1 and Mfn2 protects mitochondrial fusion defects caused by CMT2A disease mutations. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:405–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.de Brito OM, Scorrano L. Mitofusin-2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature. 2008;456:605–610. doi: 10.1038/nature07534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hailey DW, Rambold AS, Satpute-Krishnan P, Mitra K, Kim PK, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Mitochondria supply membranes for autophagosome biogenesis during starvation. Cell. 2011;141:656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Misko A, Jiang S, Wegorzeska I, Milbrandt J, Baloh RH. Mitofusin 2 is necessary for transport of axonal mitochondria and interacts with the Miro/Milton complex. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4232–4240. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6248-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wong AK, Neff MW. DOGSET: pre-designed primer sets for fine-scale mapping and DNA sequence interrogation in the dog. Anim Genet. 2009;40:569–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rojo M, Legros F, Chateau D, Lombès A. Membrane topology and mitochondrial targeting of mitofusins, ubiquitous mammalian homologs of the transmembrane GTPase Fzo. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:1663–1674. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.8.1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]