Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4443–4446. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01513-10

Emergence of Ertapenem Resistance in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase AmpC

Hélène Guillon 1,2, Didier Tande 3, Hedi Mammeri 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3165280  PMID: 21746958

Abstract

Escherichia coli isolate MEV, responsible for a bloodstream infection, was resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, and ertapenem. Molecular and biochemical characterization revealed the production of a novel, chromosome-borne, extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC) β-lactamase with a Ser-282 duplication and increased carbapenemase activity. This study demonstrates for the first time that chromosome-borne ESAC β-lactamases can contribute to the emergence of ertapenem resistance in E. coli clinical isolates.

TEXT

Escherichia coli produces a chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase at a very low level because of a weak promoter (4). Spontaneous mutations affecting the promoter region can induce overproduction of this enzyme, conferring resistance to narrow-spectrum cephalosporins (20). Moreover, structural alterations in the R2 binding site, which accommodates the R2 lateral side chain of β-lactams, can broaden the hydrolysis spectrum of AmpC β-lactamases toward extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), including cefepime (14, 28). Extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC) β-lactamases, which constitute novel group 1e in the updated functional classification of Bush and Jacoby (3), also exhibited increased catalytic efficiency against carbapenems compared to that of the parental enzymes (28). However, at that time, the phenotypic expression of this weak carbapenemase activity was detected only in porin-deficient E. coli recombinant clones (24).

We described here for the first time the emergence of ertapenem resistance in an ESAC-producing E. coli clinical isolate. E. coli MEV was recovered in two blood cultures from a 50-year-old patient suffering from myeloma at the Morvan hospital (Brest, France) in April 2008. The patient had been hospitalized multiple times in the previous 6 months and had received multiple courses of antibacterials. On admission, the patient was empirically treated with vancomycin, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin. Once the bacteriological documentation became available, the treatment was changed to imipenem and vancomycin for 13 days combined with amikacin for the first 5 days. The course of the infection was favorable.

Susceptibility testing, which was performed as previously described (26), showed that E. coli MEV was resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, and ertapenem but remained susceptible to imipenem according to the revised CLSI criteria (7 [June 2010 update]) (Table 1). The resistance was not antagonized by clavulanic acid, whereas the susceptibility to ESCs and ertapenem was partially restored by cloxacillin and phenylalanine arginine-β-naphthylamide (PAβN; Sigma-Aldrich), in agreement with AmpC β-lactamase production and efflux overexpression, respectively (3, 5). Furthermore, E. coli MEV was resistant to fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, and tobramycin.

Table 1.

MICs of β-lactams for E. coli MEV, the E. coli TOP10(pMEV) and TOP10(pAmpC-A) recombinant clones, and the E. coli TOP10 recipient strain

β-Lactam E. coli MEVa E. coli MEVa + CLOXAc E. coli MEVa + PAβNd E. coli TOP10(pMEV)a E. coli TOP10(pAmpC-A)a E. coli TOP10
Amoxicillin >512 16 >512 >512 512 2
Amoxicillin-CLAb 512 8 512 512 512 2
Ticarcillin 256 4 128 256 8 1
Ticarcillin-CLAb 128 4 64 128 8 1
Piperacillin 256 4 128 256 8 1
Piperacillin-TZBe 128 4 64 64 8 1
Cefotaxime 64 0.5 16 32 1 0.06
Ceftazidime 256 1 128 256 2 0.06
Cefepime 16 0.5 2 2 0.06 0.06
Imipenem 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.06 0.06
Ertapenem 1 0.06 0.5 0.125 0.016 0.008
Meropenem 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.032 0.032 0.032
a

E. coli MEV and TOP10(pMEV) produced the extended-spectrum AmpC-MEV β-lactamase, E. coli TOP10(pAmpC-A) produced the narrow-spectrum AmpC-A β-lactamase, and the E. coli TOP10 recipient strain did not produce a β-lactamase.

b

CLA, clavulanic acid at 2 μg/ml.

c

Cloxacillin (CLOXA) MICs were obtained using 250 μg/ml cloxacillin-containing Mueller-Hinton agar plates.

d

PAβN was used at 26.3 μg/ml (5).

e

TZB, tazobactam at 4 μg/ml.

PCR screening revealed that E. coli MEV did not harbor plasmid-mediated ampC genes (29). Moreover, isoelectric focusing analysis of the culture extract of E. coli MEV, which was performed as previously described (23), gave one β-lactamase activity with a pI value of 9.0. The entire chromosome-borne ampC gene was amplified and analyzed as described previously (20). Compared to the wild-type promoter of E. coli K-12, DNA sequence analysis of the blaAmpC-MEV gene promoter showed a C→T transition at position −42 that made a perfect TTGACA box upstream of the native −35 sequence. Moreover, the T→A transversion at position −18 resulted in a new −10 box separated by 17 bp from the new −42 box, giving rise to a strong promoter (4). The analysis of the coding sequence of the blaAmpC-MEV gene revealed a 3-bp insertion compared to the blaAmpC-A gene that codes for the wild-type cephalosporinase of E. coli strains belonging to phylogenetic group A (6, 21, 25). This insertion led to a duplication of the serine residue located at position 282 in the H-9 helix (Fig. 1) (9, 20, 28). This structural alteration is reported here for the first time.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Alignment of the amino acid sequences of wild-type AmpC and ESAC β-lactamases of E. coli clinical isolates. AmpC-A is a narrow-spectrum enzyme from E. coli EC2 (21, 25), whereas the other β-lactamases are variants exhibiting extended hydrolysis spectra. The AmpC-MEV, AmpC-BER, and AmpC-ECB33 enzymes were produced by E. coli MEV (this study), BER (26), and ECB33 isolates (20), respectively. The AmpC-EC14, AmpC-EC15, AmpC-EC16, and AmpC-EC18 β-lactamases were produced by E. coli isolates EC14, EC15, EC16, and EC18, respectively (25). AmpCD was produced by E. coli isolate HKY28 (9). The AmpC-7014517, AmpC-8009162, and AmpC-EC80 β-lactamases were produced by E. coli isolates 7014517, 8009162, and EC80, respectively (1, 8). The amino acids in the R2 loop are shaded light gray, whereas those in the H-9 helix are shaded dark gray.

The coding regions of the blaAmpC-MEV and blaAmpC-A genes were cloned into pCR-BluntII-Topo (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France), and the recombinant plasmids were subsequently transformed into E. coli strain TOP10, giving rise to E. coli TOP10(pMEV) and TOP10(pAmpC-A) recombinant clones, respectively (26). In all of the recombinant plasmids, the orientation of the clone insert was the same, with the ampC gene under the transcriptional control of the lacZ promoter flanking the cloning site.

The AmpC-MEV and AmpC-A β-lactamases were extracted from the E. coli TOP10 recombinant strains and purified as described previously (26), yielding two extracts containing the proteins at 0.38 mg/ml and 1.52 mg/ml, respectively. The homogeneity of the purified extracts (>99%) was assessed by SDS-PAGE analysis (15). The specific activities, determined with 100 μM cephalothin as the substrate, were 60 and 490 μmol/min/mg of protein, respectively. The kinetic parameters, which were determined as previously described (26), are presented in Table 2. The kcat and Km values of AmpC-MEV β-lactamase were, respectively, increased and decreased with respect to those of AmpC-A for all ESCs and imipenem, accounting for enhanced catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km).

Table 2.

Kinetic parameters of AmpC-MEV β-lactamase and the wild-type AmpC-A enzyme

ß-Lactams AmpC-MEV
AmpC-A
kcat (s−1) Km (μM) kcat/Km (μM−1.s−1) kcat (s−1) Km (μM) kcat/Km (μM−1.s−1)
Cephalothin 135 ± 15c 18 ± 2 7.5 500 ± 20 30 ± 2 16
Cephaloridine 160 ± 12 38 ± 4 4.2 230 ± 15 650 ± 30 0.35
Cefoxitina 0.056 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.7 0.3 ± 0.02 1 ± 0.05 0.3
Cefotaximea 0.25 ± 0.005 0.05 ± 0.01 5 0.2 ± 0.005 25 ± 2 0.008
Ceftazidimea 0.78 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.08 1.95 0.5 ± 0.03 70 ± 3 0.007
Cefepime 1.5 ± 0.2 60 ± 4 0.025 NDb >1,000 >0.01
Imipenema 0.01 ± 0.005 0.3 ± 0.08 0.03 0.1 ± 0.005 10 ± 0.4 0.01
a

For those compounds with a Km value of <5 μM, the Ki was determined, instead of the Km, with cephaloridine as the substrate.

b

ND, not determinable.

c

The values shown are the means ± the standard deviations of at least three independent experiments.

Surprisingly, hydrolysis of ertapenem by AmpC-MEV and AmpC-A extracts was not detectable. Such a discrepancy between phenotypic and biochemical results has already been reported (22) and might be attributable to the low but nonzero deacylation rate of AmpC β-lactamases for this compound (16).

MICs for the E. coli TOP10(pMEV) and TOP10(pAmpC-A) recombinant strains are presented in Table 1. AmpC-MEV β-lactamase conferred higher levels of resistance to all oxyiminocephalosporins than the AmpC-A enzyme, thus confirming that the Ser-282 insertion extended the hydrolysis spectrum. In contrast, E. coli strain TOP10(pMEV) remained susceptible to ertapenem, although the MIC was slightly increased compared to that for wild-type E. coli strain TOP10 (4-fold increase). This result suggested that the E. coli MEV isolate expressed an additional mechanism of resistance affecting its susceptibility to ertapenem.

The AcrAB efflux transporter and the marA gene, which encodes a transcriptional activator of the acrRAB operon, were determined by quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR as previously described (11, 13). This showed that the expression of the AcrAB transporter was significantly increased (12-fold) in E. coli MEV whereas the expression of the MarA transcriptional activator was decreased (11-fold) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

RT-PCR analysis of marA and acrA expression. Total bacterial RNA was isolated from mid-log-phase cultures of E. coli isolate MEV and wild-type E. coli strain TOP10. The normalized expression ratios of the acrA and marA genes are shown in panels A and B, respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the means of triplicate samples.

Amplification of the acrR gene, which encodes a transcriptional repressor of the acrA gene (19), was performed with primers AcrR-F (5′-GCTGCGTTTATATTATCGTCGTGC-3′) and AcrR-R (5′-GTCAAACCGCAAGAATATCACGACG-3′) and a standard PCR protocol (denaturation for 10 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C). This yielded an 815-bp amplicon for E. coli strain TOP10, whereas it was negative for E. coli MEV, suggesting that the AcrAB efflux overexpression seen in E. coli MEV is related to the deletion of the acrR gene. Whole-cell DNA of E. coli MEV was extracted and transferred onto a nylon membrane (31). Hybridization of the membrane with a fluorescein-labeled probe that was made of the PCR product of the acrR gene of E. coli strain TOP10 (23) failed, thus confirming the deletion of the acrR gene in E. coli MEV. Nevertheless, further studies, such as homologous recombination, are needed to confirm whether AcrAB efflux transporter overexpression contributes to ertapenem resistance in E. coli.

The outer membrane protein (OMP) profiles of E. coli clinical isolate MEV and control strains expressing OmpC and/or OmpF porins (27) were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) as described previously (30). Comparison of the OMP profiles showed weak expression of OmpC and lack of OmpF protein in E. coli MEV (Fig. 3), which might explain the additional resistance to ertapenem seen in E. coli clinical isolate MEV (10, 30).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

OMP profiles of E. coli strains. OMPs were profiled by SDS-PAGE. The amounts of protein added to the gel lanes were normalized. Lanes: 1, E. coli TOP10 wild-type strain; 2, E. coli isolate JF703 expressing OmpC alone (27); 3, E. coli clinical isolate MEV. The horizontal arrows on the left indicate the positions of OMPs OmpC and OmpF.

Carbapenem resistance is an emerging phenomenon among E. coli clinical isolates. To date, it has been related to transmissible β-lactamases with strong carbapenemase activity, such as metallo-β-lactamases and KPC-type and OXA-48-type β-lactamases or transmissible β-lactamases with weak carbapenemase activity, such as CTX-M-type β-lactamases or some plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases, in combination with a lack of outer membrane permeability (2, 12, 17, 18, 22, 30, 32). This study demonstrates for the first time that chromosome-borne ESAC β-lactamases can also contribute to the emergence of ertapenem resistance in E. coli clinical isolates.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence of the blaAMPC-MEV gene of E. coli MEV has been deposited in the EMBL nucleotide sequence database under accession number HQ419012.

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephanie Trudel for technical assistance in the sequencing experiment.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 11 July 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bogaerts P., et al. 2010. Molecular characterization of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates recovered at two Belgian hospitals. Pathol. Biol. 58:78–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bratu S., et al. 2007. Detection and spread of Escherichia coli possessing the plasmid-borne carbapenemase KPC-2 in Brooklyn, New York. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:972–975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bush K., Jacoby G. A. 2010. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:969–976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Caroff N., Espaze E., Gautreau D., Richet H., Reynaud A. 2000. Analysis of the effects of −42 and −32 ampC promoter mutations in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli hyperproducing ampC. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:783–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chollet R., Chevalier J., Bollet C., Pages J.-M., Davin-Regli A. 2004. RamA is an alternate activator of the multidrug resistance cascade in Enterobacter aerogenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2518–2523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Clermont O., Bonacorsi S., Bingen E. 2000. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4555–4558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2010. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twentieth informational supplement M100-S20U. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Crémet L., et al. 2010. Occurrence of ST23 complex phylogroup A Escherichia coli isolates producing extended-spectrum AmpC β-lactamase in a French hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:2216–2218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Doi Y., et al. 2004. Inhibitor-sensitive AmpC β-lactamase variant produced by an Escherichia coli clinical isolate resistant to oxyiminocephalosporins and cephamycins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2652–2658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Doumith M., Ellington M. J., Livermore D. M., Woodford N. 2009. Molecular mechanisms disrupting porin expression in ertapenem-resistant Klebsiella and Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates from the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:659–667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Girlich D., Poirel L., Nordmann P. 2009. CTX-M expression and selection of ertapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:832–834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gülmez D., et al. 2008. Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Turkey with OXA-48-like carbapenemases and outer membrane protein loss. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 31:523–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Keeney D., Ruzin A., McAleese F., Murphy E., Bradford P. A. 2008. MarA-mediated overexpression of the AcrAB efflux pump results in decreased susceptibility to tigecycline in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:46–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kim J. Y., et al. 2006. Structural basis for the extended substrate spectrum of CMY-10, a plasmid-encoded class C β-lactamase. Mol. Microbiol. 60:907–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Laemmli U. K., Favre M. 1973. Maturation of the head of bacteriophage T4. I. DNA packaging events. J. Mol. Biol. 80:575–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lakaye B., Dubus A., Lepage S., Groslambert S., Frère J.-M. 1999. When drug inactivation renders the target irrelevant to antibiotic resistance: a case story with beta-lactams. Mol. Microbiol. 31:89–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lartigue M.-F., Poirel L., Poyart C., Réglier-Poupet H., Nordmann P. 2007. Ertapenem resistance of Escherichia coli. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:315–317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu Y. F., Yan J. J., Ko W. C., Tsai S. H., Wu J. J. 2008. Characterization of carbapenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli isolates from a university hospital in Taiwan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:1020–1023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ma D., Alberti M., Lynch C., Nikaido H., Hearst J. E. 1996. The local repressor AcrR plays a modulating role in the regulation of AcrAB genes of Escherichia coli by global stress signals. Mol. Microbiol. 19:101–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mammeri H., Eb F., Berkani A., Nordmann P. 2008. Molecular characterization of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates recovered in a French hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:498–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mammeri H., Galleni M., Nordmann P. 2009. Role of the Ser-287-Asn replacement in the hydrolysis spectrum extension of AmpC beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:323–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mammeri H., Guillon H., Eb F., Nordmann P. 2010. Phenotypic and biochemical comparison of the carbapenemase-hydrolyzing activities of five major plasmid-borne AmpC β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4556–4560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mammeri H., et al. 2004. AmpC beta-lactamase in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate confers resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4050–4053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mammeri H., Nordmann P., Berkani A., Eb F. 2008. Contribution of extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC) beta-lactamases to carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 282:238–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mammeri H., Poirel L., Fortineau N., Nordmann P. 2006. Naturally occurring extended-spectrum cephalosporinases in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2573–2576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mammeri H., Poirel L., Nordmann P. 2007. Extension of the hydrolysis spectrum of AmpC beta-lactamase of Escherichia coli due to amino acid insertion in the H-10 helix. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:490–494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nikaido H., Rosenberg E. Y., Foulds J. 1983. Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with beta-lactams in intact cells. J. Bacteriol. 153:232–240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nordmann P., Mammeri H. 2007. Extended-spectrum cephalosporinases: structure, detection and epidemiology. Future Microbiol. 2:297–307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pérez-Pérez F. J., Hanson N. D. 2002. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2153–2162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Poirel L., Héritier C., Spicq C., Nordmann P. 2004. In vivo acquisition of high-level resistance to imipenem in Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3831–3833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sambrook J., Russell D. W. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Thomson K. S. 2010. Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases, AmpC, and carbapenemase issues. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:1019–1025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES