Abstract
Glycerol is a primary energy source for heterotrophic haloarchaea and a major component of “salty” biodiesel waste. Glycerol is catabolized solely by glycerol kinase (encoded by glpK) to glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) in Haloferax volcanii. Here we characterized the next critical step of this metabolic pathway: the conversion of G3P to dihydroxyacetone phosphate by G3P dehydrogenase (G3PDH). H. volcaniiharbors two putative G3PDH operons: (i) glpA1B1C1, located on the chromosome within the neighborhood of glpK, and (ii) glpA2B2C2, on megaplasmid pHV4. Analysis of knockout strains revealed that glpA1(and not glpA2) is required for growth on glycerol. However, both glpA1and glpA2could complement a glpA1knockout strain (when expressed from a strong promoter in trans) and were required for the total G3PDH activity of cell lysates. The glpA1B1C1, glpK, glpF(encoding a putative glycerol facilitator), and ptsH2(encoding a homolog of the bacterial phosphotransferase system protein Hpr) genes were transcriptionally linked and appeared to be under the control of a strong, G3P-inducible promoter upstream of glpA1. Overall, this study provides fundamental insights into glycerol metabolism in H. volcaniiand enhances our understanding of central metabolic pathways of haloarchaea.
INTRODUCTION
Glycerol is a highly abundant energy source in hypersaline environments as a result of leakage from and lysis of Dunaliellacells, which are known to accumulate glycerol in molar quantities as an organic, osmotic solute (3, 5, 7, 32). Thus, glycerol is a primary energy source for heterotrophic members of this community.
In biological systems, glycerol is metabolized to dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) by one of two routes: (i) phosphorylation by glycerol kinase and subsequent conversion of sn-glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) into DHAP through G3P dehydrogenase (G3PDH) or (ii) oxidation by glycerol dehydrogenase to form dihydroxyacetone (DHA), which is subsequently phosphorylated by an ATP-dependent or phosphoenolpyruvate:phosphotransferase system (PEP:PTS)-dependent DHA kinase to form DHAP. Once generated from glycerol, DHAP can be channeled into metabolic intermediates, including pyruvate, G3P, and/or sn-glycerol-1-phosphate (G1P).
Recently, we demonstrated through Haloferax volcaniithat haloarchaea require glycerol kinase (encoded by glpK) for the catabolism of glycerol (27). These results suggest that (i) G3PDH is needed for glycerol metabolism and (ii) the homologs of bacterial PEP:PTS-dependent DHA kinase are not needed for glycerol catabolism in H. volcaniibut may serve in the metabolism of DHA overflow products generated by other members of the hypersaline community, such as Dunaliella salina(4).
In this study, we investigated the oxidation of G3P to DHAP by G3PDH, a metabolic step likely to be central to glycerol catabolism and subsequent to the phosphorylation of glycerol by glycerol kinase in haloarchaea. Since archaea use G1PDH (encoded by egsA) to convert DHAP to G1P for the biosynthesis of phospholipids, G3PDH homologs are not common in this domain (19, 23). In contrast, bacteria and eukaryotes use G3PDH to synthesize G3P for the backbones of their membrane lipids. Although previous work has demonstrated an archaeal G3PDH, this enzyme (GspA) has an unusual preference for NADP+(26). Furthermore, GspA is not a bacterial protein-like G3PDH; instead, it is a close homolog of the products of open reading frames (ORFs) from only a few archaea (Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus, Aeropyrum pernix).
Here we provide evidence that bacterial protein-like G3PDH homologs are common among haloarchaea and are required for the catabolism of glycerol in H. volcanii. We also demonstrate that the central G3PDH activity of H. volcaniiis encoded by a glycerol metabolic operon on the main chromosome that includes not only glpA1B1C1(encoding G3PDH complex I) but also the downstream glpK(encoding glycerol kinase), glpF(encoding a putative glycerol facilitator), and ptsH2(encoding a bacterial protein-like PTS Hpr homolog) genes. This glycerol metabolic operon is under transcriptional control from a strong G3P-inducible promoter (P1glpA1) upstream of glpA1and possibly from downstream promoters (P2glpK). A large transcript (spanning the entire operon) that may undergo nucleolytic cleavage into shorter transcripts of differential stability was detected. Our findings not only provide the first molecular characterization of a bacterial protein-like G3PDH complex in archaea but also shed light on the central pathway of glycerol metabolism in haloarchaea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials.
Biochemicals used for analysis of G3PDH activity were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Other organic and inorganic molecular biology-grade chemicals were from Fisher Scientific (Atlanta, GA) and Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Desalted oligonucleotides were from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). DNA polymerases and modifying enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA).
Strains, media, and plasmids.
Strains, oligonucleotide primers, and plasmids are summarized in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material. Escherichia coliTOP10 was used for routine recombinant DNA experiments. H. volcaniistrains were transformed (8) with plasmid DNA isolated from E. coliGM2163 by use of the QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). E. colistrains were grown at 37°C (200 rpm) in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 100 mg per liter ampicillin as needed. H. volcaniistrains were grown at 42°C (200 rpm) in Casamino Acids (CA) and minimal medium (MM) with formulae according to The Halohandbook(12) except that MM was supplemented with glycerol (Gly MM), glucose (Glu MM), and/or succinate (Suc MM) at 20 mM each, unless otherwise stated. Novobiocin (0.1 μg·ml−1), 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) (50 μg·ml−1), and uracil (10 and 50 μg·ml−1for growth in the presence and absence of 5-FOA, respectively) were included as needed, and tryptophan (Trp) (820 μg·ml−1) was added where indicated. Uracil and 5-FOA were solubilized in 100% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 50 mg·ml−1prior to addition to the growth medium. For anaerobic growth on glycerol, H. volcaniistrains were grown twice aerobically on YPC medium (12) to log phase (2 ml in 13- by 100-mm tubes; 200 rpm) and were inoculated at 1% (vol/vol) for anaerobic growth in 10-ml screw-cap tubes on YPC medium supplemented with 100 mM DMSO with or without 20 mM glycerol (with growth dependent on the presence of glycerol).
For enzyme activity and RNA extraction experiments, H. volcaniicells were freshly inoculated from −80°C glycerol stocks onto agar-based media. Cells were subcultured twice during log phase and were used as an inoculum for final analysis under various conditions. Each subculture was inoculated to a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.03 to 0.04. For G3PDH enzyme activity assays and RNA preparation, cells were grown in 25 ml of medium in 250-ml flasks. For β-galactosidase activity measurements, cells were grown in 3 ml of medium in 13- by 100-cm culture tubes. Cell growth was monitored by an increase in OD600.
Chromosomal knockout of glpA1and glpA2.
Chromosomal glpA1(HVO_1538) and pHV4-based glpA2(HVO_A0269), encoding homologs of G3PDH subunit A, were deleted from the genome of H. volcaniiH26 (ΔpyrE2) by using the markerless pyrE2-based pop-in/pop-out method (1, 6) and DS2 genome sequence information (16). Details on the single and double knockouts of glpA1and glpA2are outlined in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material.
G3PDH activity assays.
Log-phase cells (OD600, 0.3 to 0.5) were harvested by centrifugation (20 min, 4,300 × g, 4°C), washed once with 20 ml buffer A (100 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 2 M NaCl), resuspended in 1 ml of buffer A containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and lysed by sonication (4 times, for 20 s each time, at 140 W). Debris was removed by centrifugation (10 min, 12,000 × g, 4°C). The protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin as a standard. Enzyme activities were carried out aerobically at 42°C in a 96-well microtiter plate. Reaction mixtures (0.1 ml) contained 5 mM DHAP, 0.25 mM NADH, 2 M NaCl, and 1 to 4 μg cell lysate in buffer A. The change in absorbance at 340 nm (A340) for reaction mixtures containing no substrate (DHAP) was subtracted from that for reaction mixtures in which the substrate was included to yield the overall change in absorbance. Reaction mixtures containing boiled enzyme and no NADH were included as negative controls. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as 1 μmol substrate consumed or product formed per min with a molar extinction coefficient of 6,220 M−1·cm−1at 340 nm.
RNA purification.
For reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), total RNA was isolated from H. volcaniiH26 grown to log phase on Gly MM using RNeasy RNA purification columns (Qiagen). RNA was treated with amplification-grade DNase I according to the supplier's recommendations (Sigma-Aldrich), with the following modification: RNA was incubated with 3 U enzyme per μg RNA for 45 min at room temperature. Total RNA used for Northern blot analysis was prepared from H. volcaniistrain H26 (grown to log phase on Glu MM or Gly Glu MM) using TRI reagent (Sigma), followed by DNase I treatment (as described above). The integrity of RNA was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the RNA concentration was determined by A260using a SmartSpec 3000 spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad).
RT-PCR analysis.
Total RNA (0.1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using an iScript kit (Bio-Rad) (25°C for 5 min, 42°C for 30 min, 85°C for 5 min). Specific cDNAs were amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material, TaqDNA polymerase with an appropriate buffer, a solution of mixed deoxynucleotides, and an iCycler (Bio-Rad). Reaction mixtures were preheated to 95°C (4 min), followed by 35 amplification cycles consisting of denaturation (30 s at 95°C), annealing (1 min at the temperatures listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material), and elongation (41 s at 72°C), after which a final extension was performed at 72°C (10 min). For each RT-PCR, controls were included to exclude genomic DNA contamination, and RT-PCR products were sequenced to confirm primer pair specificity.
Northern blot analysis.
Total RNA (10 μg per lane) was denatured and fractionated by electrophoresis (4 h, 50 V) using formaldehyde-0.8% (wt/vol) agarose gels in 1× morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (20 mM MOPS [pH 7.0], 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA) according to standard procedures (2). RNA molecular mass standards labeled with 2′ dUTP coupled by an 11-atom spacer to digoxigenin (DIG-11-dUTP) (0.3- to 6.9-kb RNA ladder; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) were included. After several rinses with deionized water, the gel was incubated (45 min) in 10× saline sodium citrate (SSC) (where 20× SSC is 3 M NaCl plus 0.3 M sodium citrate [pH 7.0]). RNA was transferred to a BrightStar-Plus nylon membrane (Ambion, Austin, TX) by upward capillary action overnight using 20× SSC, cross-linked using a UV Stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene), and hybridized overnight at 50°C with DIG-labeled double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) probes specific for glpKand glpA1.PCRs for the generation of the probes were performed with the primers listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material and TaqDNA polymerase according to the supplier's recommendations with the following modifications: 3% (vol/vol) DMSO was included, and the 1× DIG deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate mixture (catalog no. 1277065; Roche) was supplemented with a solution of mixed deoxynucleotides (New England Biolabs) to 0.1 mM. For hybridization, membranes with the cross-linked RNA samples were equilibrated in high-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer (5× SSC, 2% [wt/vol] blocking reagent, 0.1% [wt/vol] N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.2% [wt/vol] SDS, 50% [wt/vol] formamide) (2 h, 50°C), followed by incubation with 100 ng labeled probe in 10 ml of high-SDS buffer (16 h, 50°C). Membranes were washed with 2× SSC supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) SDS (twice, for 5 min each time) and with 0.1× SSC supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) SDS (twice, for 15 min each time, at 50°C). Hybridization products were detected by a chemiluminescent (CSPD*) digoxigenin immunoassay (Roche).
Transcriptional reporter construction and assay.
A plasmid-based reporter system was used to analyze transcription (10) from promoter regions upstream of glpA1, glpK, and tnaAthat were fused to the Haloferax alicantei-derived bgaHgene encoding β-galactosidase (for details, see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). The promoter activity of each construct was determined by an assay of the β-galactosidase activity of log-phase cells as described previously (17). One unit of β-galactosidase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the hydrolysis of 1 μmol o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (ONPG)·min−1with a molar extinction coefficient for o-nitrophenol of 3,300 M−1·cm−1.
HPLC analysis of glycerol and glucose.
At various time points, culture broths (1 ml) of both the parent (H26) and glpA1mutant (KS11) strains growing on 5 mM Gly Glu MM (MM supplemented with glycerol and glucose at 5 mM each) were withdrawn and centrifuged (10 min at 10,000 × gand 4°C). Supernatant fractions were filtered and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Bio-Rad HPX-87H column with a 4 mM H2SO4eluent.
DNA sequencing.
Sanger automated DNA sequencing was performed using an Applied Biosystems model 3130 genetic analyzer (ICBR Genomics Division, University of Florida).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Bacterial G3PDH homologs in haloarchaea.
Glycerol metabolism in H. volcaniirequires the phosphorylation of glycerol to G3P by a bacterial protein-like glycerol kinase (encoded by glpK) (27). To analyze the subsequent step, the oxidation of G3P to DHAP, homologs of bacterial G3PDH enzymes known to catalyze this reaction were identified in H. volcaniiand other haloarchaeal genomes. This included the identification of haloarchaeal homologs of all three subunits of the anaerobic G3PDH complex (GlpA, GlpB, and GlpC) of bacteria (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Homologs of the G3PDH catalytic subunit A, GlpA, were also identified in archaea of the classes Thermoplasmataand Thermoprotei(see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). In contrast to the haloarchaea, the latter archaea do not encode homologs of the bacterial GlpB or GlpC proteins, which (in addition to GlpA) are essential for the anaerobic growth of E. colion G3P (31). Thus, among the archaea, only the haloarchaea appear to encode bacterial protein-like G3PDH complexes in addition to homologs of bacterial glycerol kinase and PTS components, including a putative PEP:PTS-dependent DHA kinase (27).
Most haloarchaea encode two GlpA-related proteins (GlpA1 and GlpA2) and single GlpB and GlpC homologs. Typically, the haloarchaeal genes (glpA1and glpA2) encoding the GlpA homologs are located on the main chromosome, with glpA1organized in an apparent glpA1 glpB1C2operon and glpA2in a separate chromosomal region (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). H. volcaniiis exceptional in that it harbors two apparent glpABCoperons, with (i) glpA1located on the main chromosome upstream of glpB1C1-glpK-glpF-ptsH2and (ii) glpA2located on megaplasmid pHV4 upstream of glpB2C2(Fig. 1). While most of the haloarchaeal GlpA homologs cluster phylogenetically into distinct GlpA1 and GlpA2 lineages, the H. volcaniiGlpA homologs cluster together in the haloarchaeal GlpA1 lineage (see Fig. S1). Consistent with this relationship, H. volcaniiGlpA1 and GlpA2 are similar in amino acid length and harbor a C-terminal bacterioferritin-associated ferredoxin (BFD)-like [2Fe-2S] domain common to bacterial GlpA proteins (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). The GlpA2 homologs of other haloarchaea are missing the BFD-like domain. Although the physiological role of BFD domains remains unclear, this protein may serve as a general redox enzyme and/or a regulatory component of iron storage and mobilization (15). Thus, based on its genome sequence, H. volcaniiharbors two separate glpABCoperons that may encode functional G3PDH complexes.
Fig. 1.
Organization of glycerol metabolic genes on the H. volcaniiDS2 genome. Shown are schematic representations of the glpA2B2C2genes on megaplasmid pHV4 and of the glpA1B1C1, glpK, glpF, and ptsH2genes on the main chromosome. Open reading frames glpA1B1C1(HVO_1538 to HVO_1540) and glpA2B2C2(HVO_A0269 to HVO_A0271) encode G3PDH homologs; glpK(HVO_1541) encodes glycerol kinase; glpF(HVO_1542) encodes a putative glycerol facilitator (GlpF) based on predicted membrane topology and common linkage to glycerol metabolic operons among diverse haloarchaea; and ptsH2(HVO_1543) encodes a homolog of phosphotransferase system (PTS) histidine-phosphorylatable Hpr proteins of bacteria (for reviews of bacterial GlpF and Hpr proteins, see references 29and 11, respectively). Braces indicate annealing sites for primer pairs and regions amplified by RT-PCR. Annealing sites for primer pairs used in the construction of glpA1- and glpK-specific probes for Northern blotting (NB) and RT-qPCR are also indicated (for primer details, see reference 27). P1glpA1and P2glpK, promoter regions upstream of glpA1and glpK, respectively. Open arrows represent coding regions for each open reading frame. Bar, 1,000 bp.
Knockout of glpA1and glpA2from the H. volcaniigenome.
To investigate the function of haloarchaeal G3PDH homologs, glpA1and glpA2were targeted for markerless deletion from the genome of H. volcaniiH26 (designated the wild-type strain throughout this study). Genes encoding GlpA homologs were selected for knockout, since subunit A is required for the catalytic activity of G3PDH in E. coli(9). Markerless deletion was confirmed by PCR, Southern blotting, and DNA sequence analysis (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material).
Requirement of glpA1for glycerol metabolism.
The glpA1(KS11) and glpA2(KS10) mutant strains were compared to the wild type with respect to growth on glycerol and glucose (Gly MM and Glu MM, respectively). Since G3PDH gene expression is often regulated by environmental conditions (14), strains were examined for growth on glycerol by using oxygen as well as dimethyl sulfoxide as a terminal electron acceptor. While all strains grew similarly to the wild type on glucose, and the glpA2mutant grew similarly to the wild type on glycerol, the glpA1mutant was unable to grow on glycerol (Fig. 2A). The glpA1mutant was complemented by expressing glpA1or glpA2in transfrom a strong Halobacterium salinarumrRNA P2 promoter with the pHV2-based plasmid pJAM2696 or pJAM2711, respectively (Fig. 2A; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material). HPLC analysis of cell culture broth revealed that the glpA1mutant could not utilize glycerol and consumed only glucose during growth in a medium with glycerol and glucose (Fig. 2B). This contrasted with the behavior of wild-type cells, which utilized both glycerol and glucose, with an apparent preference for glycerol, as observed previously (27). Together, these results reveal that glpA1(like glpK-encoded glycerol kinase [27]) is needed for growth on glycerol and for glycerol metabolism. The ability of glpA2to trans-complement the glpA1mutant suggests that GlpA2 is a functional homolog of GlpA1. Since the genomic copy of glpA2is not required for growth on glycerol and does not compensate for the loss of glpA1when controlled by the glp2native promoter, it is likely that the genomic copy of glpA2is not transcribed under these conditions (even in the absence of glpA1). Thus, glpA2transcript levels were examined by RT-PCR for wild-type and mutant strains, including KS10 (ΔglpA2) and KS11 (ΔglpA1), with and without trans-complementation by glpA2(pJAM2711). Cells were grown on medium with glycerol and glucose; the latter carbon source was included to allow for the growth of KS11. With this approach, glpA2transcripts were readily detected in the glpA1mutant trans-complemented with glpA2(KS11/pJAM2711) but were not detected when glpA2was present only in a genomic copy or was deleted (H26, KS10, and KS11) (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). These findings explain why glpA1(and not glpA2) is required for standard growth on glycerol and why glpA2complements the glpA1knockout when expressed in transfrom a strong promoter. Whether glpA2is induced by other environmental conditions is unclear.
Fig. 2.
Catabolism of glycerol requires the G3PDH homolog GlpA1 in H. volcanii. (A) Growth of H. volcaniistrains on glycerol (Gly MM) with oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor. H. volcanii strains (indicated on the right) include the wild-type parent (H26) and the ΔglpA1(KS11) and ΔglpA2(KS10) strains with or without the vector control (pJAM202c) or a complementary plasmid (pJAM2696, providing glpA1in trans, or pJAM2711, providing glpA2in trans). Growth was monitored by the increase in the OD600. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the means ± standard deviations were calculated. A similar requirement of glpA1(and not glpA2) for growth on glycerol was observed when cells were grown anaerobically with DMSO as the terminal electron acceptor (data not shown). (B) Metabolism of glycerol by the H. volcaniiwild-type strain (H26) compared to that by the glpA1mutant strain (KS11). H. volcaniistrains were inoculated onto 5 mM Gly Glu MM and were monitored for growth (OD600) as well as for the utilization of glucose and glycerol in the presence of oxygen as indicated. All experiments were performed at least in biological triplicate.
G3PDH activity levels are altered by the carbon source.
To further investigate G3PDH, its specific activity was determined in lysates of H. volcaniicells (H26, the wild-type strain) grown to log phase on a medium containing glycerol, glucose, or glycerol plus glucose. G3PDH activity was 2.7-fold higher in cells grown on glycerol than in cells grown on glucose alone (Table 1). However, as with the H. volcaniiglycerol kinase (27), the levels of G3PDH activity were not significantly reduced in cells grown with both glucose and glycerol. This contrasts with the findings for many bacteria and yeast that glycerol catabolism (including the levels of glycerol kinase and G3PDH activities) is substantially reduced by the addition of glucose to the growth medium (22, 28).
Table 1.
G3PDH-specific activity of the parent strain and mutant strains deficient in the synthesis of glycerol kinase or G3PDH subunit A homologs
| Straina1 | G3PDH sp act (mU·mg−1)bwith the following medium: |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gly MM | Glu MM | Gly Glu MM | |
| H26 (parent) | 76 ± 10 | 28 ± 4 | 67 ± 10 |
| ΔglpA1mutant | No growth | 19 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 |
| ΔglpA2mutant | 55 ± 6 | 24 ± 2 | 47 ± 6 |
| ΔglpA1ΔglpA2mutant | No growth | UD | UD |
| ΔglpKmutant | No growth | 19 ± 4 | 21 ± 1 |
| ΔglpA1/glpA1strain | 70 ± 9 | 26 ± 6 | 68 ± 9 |
| ΔglpA1/glpA2strain | 67 ± 3 | 28 ± 5 | 67 ± 4 |
| ΔglpA2/glpA2strain | 73 ± 9 | 28 ± 5 | 72 ± 7 |
| ΔglpK/glpKstrain | 72 ± 8 | 27 ± 3 | 67 ± 5 |
The ΔglpKstrain is deficient in the synthesis of glycerol kinase; the ΔglpA1and ΔglpA2strains are deficient in the synthesis of G3PDH subunit A homologs. Slashes are used to indicate strains with plasmids expressing glpK, glpA1, or glpA2in trans.
G3PDH activity was determined for cell lysates as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were grown to log phase in minimal medium (MM) with Gly, Glu, or both as indicated. No growth, mutant strains that did not grow on Gly MM; UD, undetectable levels of activity. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate, and the means ± standard deviations were calculated. No activity was detected for controls with no substrate or with boiled cell lysates.
GlpA1 and GlpA2 are required for full G3PDH activity.
We next examined whether glpA1and/or glpA2was responsible for the G3PDH activity observed. Cell lysates were prepared from glpA1and glpA2mutants (grown on glycerol and/or glucose) and were assayed for G3PDH activity compared to that for the wild type. Neither single knockout of glpA1nor single knockout of glpA2had a notable impact on the low levels of G3PDH activity detected in glucose-grown cells (Table 1). However, when cells were grown in the presence of glycerol, the G3PDH activity of the glpA1mutant remained low, at levels 3.7-fold lower than those for the wild-type strain under these growth conditions (Table 1). In contrast, knockout of glpA2had only a slight impact (a 1.4-fold reduction from the wild-type level) on the high-levels of G3PDH activity observed in cells grown on glycerol (with or without glucose) (Table 1). Both the glpA1and glpA2mutant strains were complemented by providing a copy of the respective gene in trans, confirming that the reductions in G3PDH activity observed on glycerol were not due to polar effects of the mutations (Table 1). The G3PDH activity of the glpA1mutant was also restored to wild-type levels by providing glpA2in trans(Table 1), again suggesting that glpA2is a functional analog of glpA1. To further investigate the roles of glpA1and glpA2, a double knockout of both glpA1and glpA2was constructed (KS12) and was found to be devoid of any detectable G3PDH activity, even when cells were grown in the presence of glycerol (Gly Glu MM) (Table 1). Thus, GlpA1 and GlpA2 are required for the full G3PDH activity of H. volcanii, and the levels of the GlpA1-dependent G3PDH activity are substantially increased by the addition of glycerol to the growth medium.
G3P is needed for enhanced levels of GlpA1-dependent G3PDH activity.
Glycerol catabolism is often intricately coordinated by a number of mechanisms in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In E. coli, the glpregulon (mediating glycerol and G3P catabolism) is controlled at the transcriptional level by anaerobic conditions, catabolite repression, and the inducer G3P, which binds the DeoR-type regulator GlpR and alleviates transcriptional repression of the glpregulon (14, 33). To improve our understanding of the inducers of glycerol catabolism in H. volcaniithat may be responsible for the enhanced levels of GlpA1-dependent G3PDH activity observed during growth on glycerol (with or without glucose) compared to growth on glucose alone, the G3PDH activity of a glpK(glycerol kinase) mutant was determined. Consistent with the possibility that G3P regulates the levels of G3PDH produced in the cell, the glpKmutant (unable to synthesize G3P) displayed a lower level of G3PDH activity than the wild-type strain during growth in the presence of glycerol (Table 1). G3PDH activity was restored to wild-type levels in the glpKmutant by trans-complementation with glpK(Table 1). Thus, we speculate that G3P, generated by GlpK during growth in the presence of glycerol, alleviates the transcriptional repression of glpA1and enhances the levels of G3PDH in H. volcanii.
Intergenic regions upstream of glpA1and glpKcan drive transcription.
To further examine the regulation of glycerol catabolism in H. volcanii, genomic regions immediately upstream of the translational start codons of glpA1(P1glpA1) and glpK(P2glpK) (310 and 354 bp, respectively) were fused to the H. alicantei bgaHgene, encoding β-galactosidase. Transcription, driven by promoter elements within these regions, was monitored by an assay of β-galactosidase activity in lysates prepared from cells carrying these transcription fusions. With this approach, transcription from P1glpA1and P2glpKwas found to be higher than that from the vector control, which retained a Shine-Dalgarno sequence but lacked promoter elements upstream of the bgaHreporter gene (Table 2). Most notable was transcription from P1glpA1, which was 7-fold higher during growth on glycerol (with or without glucose) than during growth on glucose alone. In contrast, transcription from P2glpKwas constitutive and at relatively low levels, only ∼2-fold higher than that from the vector control (for all strains and conditions examined) (Table 2). The glycerol-responsive promoter P1glpA1was not as highly induced as the tryptophan-responsive tnaApromoter (PtnaA) developed by Large et al. (20) for conditional expression of genes in H. volcanii(7-fold induction for P1glpA1versus 45-fold induction for PtnaA) (Table 2). However, P1glpA1may serve as a nice complement to PtnaAfor experiments requiring differential gene regulation. When glycerol was included in the medium, expression from P1glpA1was comparable to that from H. salinarumP2rrnA, used routinely for protein production in recombinant strains of H. volcanii(18, 30) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Transcription from the glpA1, glpK, and tnaApromoter regions based on a β-galactosidase reporter gene
| Medium and strain | Sp act of β-galactosidase (mU·mg−1)awith the following promoterb: |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1glpA1(310 bp) | P2glpK(354 bp) | PtnaA(321 bp) | P2rrnA(551 bp) | Vector (none) | |
| Gly MM | |||||
| H26 (parent) | 310 ± 5 | 16 ± 2 | ND | 260 ± 10 | 8.1 ± 0.1 |
| ΔglpKmutant | No growth | No growth | No growth | No growth | No growth |
| ΔglpA1mutant | No growth | No growth | No growth | No growth | No growth |
| ΔglpRmutant | 300 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 | ND | 260 ± 3 | 8.7 ± 0.9 |
| Glu MM | |||||
| H26 (parent) | 38 ± 0.1 | 22 ± 0.7 | ND | 250 ± 7 | 7.3 ± 0.9 |
| ΔglpKmutant | 30 ± 1 | 25 ± 2 | ND | 250 ± 8 | 6.5 ± 0.7 |
| ΔglpA1mutant | 35 ± 3 | 21 ± 1 | ND | 260 ± 3 | 9.2 ± 1 |
| ΔglpRmutant | 36 ± 0.5 | 23 ± 0.6 | ND | 250 ± 4 | 8.3 ± 0.9 |
| Gly Glu MM | |||||
| H26 (parent) | 280 ± 8 | 14 ± 2 | ND | 260 ± 2 | 8.1 ± 0.05 |
| ΔglpKmutant | 28 ± 2 | 22 ± 3 | ND | 250 ± 5 | 8.3 ± 0.6 |
| ΔglpA1mutant | 270 ± 9 | 18 ± 0.5 | ND | 240 ± 6 | 7.3 ± 0.5 |
| ΔglpRmutant | 270 ± 8 | 19 ± 1 | ND | 250 ± 7 | 8.0 ± 0.5 |
| Suc MM (H26 [parent]) | ND | ND | 38 ± 6 | 260 ± 20 | 8.0 ± 0.08 |
| Suc Trp MM (H26 [parent]) | ND | ND | 1,700 ± 50 | 230 ± 30 | 7.4 ± 0.07 |
Determined from the lysates of cells grown to log phase in minimal medium (MM) as indicated. No growth, mutant strains that did not grow on Gly MM; ND, not determined. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate, and the means ± standard deviations were calculated.
The parental strain H26 and the ΔglpK, ΔglpA1, and ΔglpRmutant strains were transformed with a plasmid carrying the promoter region of glpA1(P1glpA1) or glpK(P2glpK) transcriptionally fused to the β-galactosidase bgaHreporter gene. The tryptophan-inducible promoter PtnaAand the strong promoter P2rrnAwere included for comparison. Promoter fusions included the start codon and genomic region immediately upstream of each target gene. The length of the promoter fusion is given in parentheses after the promoter designation. Plasmid vector pJAM2715, containing only a Shine-Dalgarno sequence upstream of bgaH, served as a negative control.
G3P is an inducer of glpA1transcription.
To examine whether G3P is an inducer of G3PDH gene expression, transcription from P1glpA1was monitored in glpKand glpA1mutant strains. Wild-type cells and reporter gene constructs carrying P2glpKand P2rrnApromoter fusions were included along with the vector control for comparison. The rationale for using the glpKand glpA1mutants is that these strains are likely to differ in their cellular G3P levels during growth in the presence of glycerol. The glpKmutant is unable to convert glycerol to G3P (27), while the ability of the glpA1mutant to oxidize G3P to DHAP is impaired (Table 1). Consistent with the model that G3P is an inducer of transcription from a promoter upstream of glpA1, our reporter assays revealed that transcription from P1glpA1in a glpKknockout strain was constitutive and was 10-fold lower than that of the wild type (and the glpA1mutant) when cells were grown in the presence of glycerol (Table 2). Expression from P2glpKand the P2rrnAcontrol was also constitutive but was not altered by any of the genomic mutations or growth conditions examined (Table 2). Thus, in the absence of G3P (in the glpK-deficient strain), transcription from P1glpA1is reduced to constitutive and basal levels. These results are consistent with the E. colimodel, in which G3P serves as the inducer for the glycerol metabolic operon (9). In E. coli, G3P relieves the transcriptional repression mediated by GlpR (21), thus allowing expression of the glpregulon, including the glpD, glpTQ, and glpFKXoperons, when cells are grown in the absence of glucose and the presence of glycerol.
GlpR is not required for G3P induction of glpA1transcription.
To directly examine whether H. volcaniiGlpR modulates transcription from either P1glpA1or P2glpK, the transcriptional reporter constructs of these promoter regions were analyzed in a glpRknockout strain (KS8) (Table 2). In contrast to the E. colimodel, we do not predict repression of the H. volcaniiglycerol metabolic operon by a DeoR/GlpR-type regulator. This hypothesis is based on our previous data (27), which demonstrate that during growth on glycerol, the single DeoR/GlpR-type regulator of H. volcaniicontrols both fructose and glucose metabolic enzymes through transcriptional repression of pfkB(encoding phosphofructokinase) and kdgK1(encoding 2-keto-3-deoxy-d-gluconate kinase) (25). In agreement with our prediction that H. volcaniiGlpR is not required for the regulation of G3PDH gene expression, transcription from both P1glpA1and P2glpKwas independent of the glpRmutation (Table 2). This apparent difference in the regulation of the glycerol metabolic operons between H. volcaniiand E. coliis consistent with the distant phylogenetic relationship between these two microbes and their disparate habitats. Glycerol is a major source of carbon in many of the hypersaline environments where H. volcaniithrives, whereas it plays a more limited role in the ecosystems of E. coli. Furthermore, H. volcaniihas an apparent preference for glycerol over glucose, while E. colidoes not.
Transcriptional organization of the glpoperon.
Due to the close proximity of glpA1B1C1, glpK, glpF, and ptsH2on the chromosomes of H. volcanii(Fig. 1) and other haloarchaea, we investigated whether these genes formed an operon(s). Initial analysis was performed by RT-PCR using total RNA extracted from wild-type cells grown on glycerol (Gly MM). Primers were designed to anneal within the coding regions of neighboring genes, including glpA1and glpB1(13-bp overlap in the coding sequence), glpB1and glpC1(3-bp overlap in the coding sequence), glpKand glpF(4-bp intergenic region), glpFand ptsH2(2-bp overlap in the coding sequence), and glpC1and glpK(363-bp intergenic region) (Fig. 1); the latter primer pair is from our previous work (27). In each case, a single RT-PCR product with a molecular size and DNA sequence consistent with cotranscription of these neighboring genes was detected (Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3.
The H. volcaniiG3PDH and glycerol kinase genes required for glycerol catabolism are cotranscribed in an operon. (A) RT-PCR analysis of glycerol metabolic genes. H. volcaniiRNA (total RNA isolated from the parent strain H26 grown aerobically on Gly MM) was analyzed by RT-PCR using primer pairs annealing to the 3′ and 5′ ends of glpA1and glpB1(lane 1), glpB1and glpC1(lane 2), glpC1and glpK(lane 3), glpKand glpF(lane 4), and glpFand ptsH2(lane 5) (primer pairs in Fig. 1are numbered according to lane numbers here). Negative controls (lanes 6 to 10) included RNA that had not undergone reverse transcription for each PCR to confirm that the RT-PCR products (lanes 1 to 5, respectively) were not contaminated with genomic DNA. All RT-PCR products were sequenced to confirm specificity. The Mrs (in thousands) of DNA standards (Quick-Load 100-bp DNA ladder) are indicated on the left. (B) Northern blot analysis of the glycerol catabolic operon. Total RNA was isolated from H. volcaniiH26 (parent) grown at 42°C (200 rpm) in the presence (Glu Gly MM [lanes 1 and 3]) or absence (Glu MM [lanes 2 and 4]) of glycerol and was analyzed by Northern blotting with DIG-labeled probes specific for glpA1(lanes 1 and 2) and glpK(lanes 3 and 4) as indicated. The Mrs (in thousands) of DIG-labeled RNA molecular weight marker I are indicated on the left. Detectable transcripts are indicated by arrows on the right. See Fig. 1for details on primer and probe annealing sites as well as the organization of ORFs and intergenic spacers. The molecular sizes of genomic regions (ORFs and intergenic spacers) based on the DNA sequence of H. volcaniiDS2 include the following: 7.7 kb for glpA1B1C1-glpKF-ptsH2, 6.2 kb for glpA1B1C1-glpK, 4.3 kb for glpA1B1C1, 3.2 kb for glpC1-glpK, 3.0 kb for glpKF-ptsH2, 2.6 kb for glpKF, and 1.5 kb for glpK.
To further examine the transcripts generated from the glycerol metabolic operon, total RNA (extracted from wild-type cells grown on glucose with or without glycerol) was analyzed by Northern blotting using probes specific for glpA1and glpK. With this approach, glpA1-specific transcripts of ∼4.3 kb, a size consistent with the glpA1B1C1coding region, were readily detected in cells grown on glycerol plus glucose (Fig. 3B). Less-prominent glpA1-specific transcripts of ∼7.7 kb were also observed in these cells, suggesting that the glpA1B1C1operon is cotranscribed with its downstream gene neighbors (Fig. 3B). In addition to these glpA1-specific transcripts, glpK-specific transcripts of multiple lengths were identified in cells grown on glycerol and glucose, including highly abundant transcripts of ∼2.5 kb as well as less abundant transcripts of ∼4.3, 6.3, and 7.7 kb (Fig. 3B). Although most of the transcripts that hybridized to the glpA1- and glpK-specific probes were not observed in cells grown on glucose alone, the glpK-specific transcripts of ∼2.5 kb were detected at low levels in glucose-grown cells. Based on its size, the latter transcript (present in cells grown in the presence or absence of glycerol) may be the cotranscript of glpKand glpFdetected by RT-PCR (Fig. 3A), since these genes span 2.6 kb of the genome. Production of glpKFtranscripts in the absence of glycerol may be physiologically advantageous, since both gene products (a glycerol kinase and a putative glycerol facilitator) are predicted to be required early in glycerol catabolism and produce the internal G3P needed to induce the system. The molecular mechanism(s) responsible for generating the glpA1- and glpK-specific transcripts of various lengths remains unclear. However, our results suggest that transcription of the glycerol metabolic operon of H. volcaniiis driven by more than one promoter element (the G3P-inducible promoter P1glpA1and the constitutive promoter P2glpK) and that the primary transcript(s) from this operon may be cleaved into shorter transcripts of differential stability. While mechanisms of RNA degradation in archaea have only recently been studied (13), examples of RNase-mediated endonucleolytic cleavage of primary transcripts into shorter transcripts with different half-lives are well characterized in bacteria (24).
Conclusions.
Here we demonstrate that H. volcaniirequires G3PDH encoded by an operon on the main chromosome for the catabolism of glycerol. Although two genomic regions (glpA1B1C1on the main chromosome and glpA2B2C2on megaplasmid pHV4) are predicted to encode homologs of all three subunits of the anaerobic G3PDH of bacteria, we demonstrate that G3P is dissimilated primarily through the GlpA1-containing G3PDH. GlpA2, though a functional complement to GlpA1 and required for the basal levels of G3PDH activity observed in a glpA1knockout strain, is not required for growth on glycerol. Interestingly, GlpA1 is needed for the enhanced levels of G3PDH activity observed when cells are grown on glycerol (with or without glucose) compared to growth on glucose alone. Promoter fusions to bgaH(Table 2) reveal that the genomic region upstream of glpA1(P1glpA1) harbors a strong promoter element that is tightly controlled and is induced by growth in the presence of glycerol. This increase in P1glpA1-mediated transcription is likely responsible for the differences observed between G3PDH activity during growth on glycerol and that in its absence. G3P appears to serve as the inducer of P1glpA1-mediated transcription, based on the requirement of glycerol kinase (and not glpA1-encoded G3PDH) for this induction during growth on glycerol. In contrast to the E. colimodel, this induction is not subject to regulation by a DeoR/GlpR-type repressor; instead, it is mediated by an uncharacterized protein in H. volcanii. Interestingly, transcription from the intergenic region between glpC1and glpK(P2glpK) occurs only at basal levels and is not responsive to growth on glycerol. Further examination of the glpA1B1C1, glpK, glpF, and ptsH2genes by RT-PCR analysis and Northern blotting revealed that all six genes are cotranscribed with their neighboring genes. Distinct transcripts of various lengths are generated from this operon, not all of which are predicted based on transcription from P1glpA1and P2glpK. Interestingly, we observed previously by RT-quantitative PCR (qPCR) that glpA1-and glpK-specific transcripts are at differential levels (78- and 9-fold, respectively) in glycerol-grown versus glucose-grown cells (27). The regulatory process(es) responsible for controlling the levels of these transcripts has yet to be fully elucidated. However, our current results reveal multiple mechanisms that may be utilized by the cell to control transcripts of this glycerol metabolic operon, including (i) G3P-inducible P1glpA1-driven and constitutive P2glpK-driven transcription and (ii) posttranscriptional processing of a primary transcript (spanning the entire 7.7-kb operon) into smaller transcripts that may be of differential stability.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank N. Nembhard for critical reading of the manuscript and H. Miranda for the construction of KS11/pJAM2711. We also thank T. Allers for providing strains and plasmids (H26, pTA131, and pTA102) and Savita Shanker at the UF Genomics Core of UF ICBR for DNA sequencing. We acknowledge Samantha Waters for technical assistance in screening for the glpA1 glpA2mutant.
This work was funded in part by NIHR01 GM057498and DOEDE-FG02-05ER15650to J.A.M.-F.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.
Published ahead of print on 1 July 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Allers T., Ngo H. P., Mevarech M., Lloyd R. G. 2004. Development of additional selectable markers for the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcaniibased on the leuBand trpAgenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:943–953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ausubel F. M., et al. 1987. Current protocols in molecular biology, p. 1–11 Green Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bardavid R. E., Khristo P., Oren A. 2008. Interrelationships between Dunaliellaand halophilic prokaryotes in saltern crystallizer ponds. Extremophiles 12:5–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bardavid R. E., Oren A. 2008. Dihydroxyacetone metabolism in Salinibacter ruberand in Haloquadratum walsbyi. Extremophiles 12:125–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ben-Amotz A., Avron M. 1973. The role of glycerol in the osmotic regulation of the halophilic alga Dunaliella parva. Plant Physiol. 51:875–878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bitan-Banin G., Ortenberg R., Mevarech M. 2003. Development of a gene knockout system for the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcaniiby use of the pyrEgene. J. Bacteriol. 185:772–778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Borowitzka L. J., Brown A. D. 1974. The salt relations of marine and halophilic species of the unicellular green alga, Dunaliella. The role of glycerol as a compatible solute. Arch. Mikrobiol. 96:37–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cline S. W., Lam W. L., Charlebois R. L., Schalkwyk L. C., Doolittle W. F. 1989. Transformation methods for halophilic archaebacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 35:148–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cole S. T., et al. 1988. Nucleotide sequence and gene-polypeptide relationships of the glpABCoperon encoding the anaerobic sn-glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coliK-12. J. Bacteriol. 170:2448–2456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Delmas S., Shunburne L., Ngo H. P., Allers T. 2009. Mre11-Rad50 promotes rapid repair of DNA damage in the polyploid archaeon Haloferax volcaniiby restraining homologous recombination. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Deutscher J., Francke C., Postma P. W. 2006. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:939–1031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dyall-Smith M. March 2009. The Halohandbook: protocols for halobacterial genetics, version 7.1. Dyall-Smith M. Max Planck Institute, Martinsried, Germany: http://www.haloarchaea.com/resources/halohandbook/Halohandbook_2009_v7.1.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 13. Evguenieva-Hackenberg E., Klug G. 2009. RNA degradation in Archaeaand Gram-negative bacteria different from Escherichia coli. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 85:275–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Freedberg W. B., Lin E. C. 1973. Three kinds of controls affecting the expression of the glpregulon in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 115:816–823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Garg R. P., Vargo C. J., Cui X., Kurtz D. M., Jr 1996. A [2Fe-2S] protein encoded by an open reading frame upstream of the Escherichia colibacterioferritin gene. Biochemistry 35:6297–6301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hartman A. L., et al. 2010. The complete genome sequence of Haloferax volcaniiDS2, a model archaeon. PLoS One 5:e9605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Holmes M. L., Dyall-Smith M. L. 2000. Sequence and expression of a halobacterial β-galactosidase gene. Mol. Microbiol. 36:114–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kaczowka S. J., Reuter C. J., Talarico L. A., Maupin-Furlow J. A. 2005. Recombinant production of Zymomonas mobilispyruvate decarboxylase in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. Archaea 1:327–334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Koga Y., Morii H. 2007. Biosynthesis of ether-type polar lipids in archaea and evolutionary considerations. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:97–120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Large A., et al. 2007. Characterization of a tightly controlled promoter of the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcaniiand its use in the analysis of the essential cct1gene. Mol. Microbiol. 66:1092–1106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Larson T. J., Ye S. Z., Weissenborn D. L., Hoffmann H. J., Schweizer H. 1987. Purification and characterization of the repressor for the sn-glycerol 3-phosphate regulon of Escherichia coliK12. J. Biol. Chem. 262:15869–15874 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lin E. C. 1976. Glycerol dissimilation and its regulation in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 30:535–578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nishihara M., Yamazaki T., Oshima T., Koga Y. 1999. sn-Glycerol-1-phosphate-forming activities in Archaea: separation of archaeal phospholipid biosynthesis and glycerol catabolism by glycerophosphate enantiomers. J. Bacteriol. 181:1330–1333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rauhut R., Klug G. 1999. mRNA degradation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23:353–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rawls K. S., Yacovone S. K., Maupin-Furlow J. A. 2010. GlpR represses fructose and glucose metabolic enzymes at the level of transcription in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 192:6251–6260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sakasegawa S., Hagemeier C. H., Thauer R. K., Essen L. O., Shima S. 2004. Structural and functional analysis of the gpsAgene product of Archaeoglobus fulgidus: a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase with an unusual NADP+preference. Protein Sci. 13:3161–3171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sherwood K. E., Cano D. J., Maupin-Furlow J. A. 2009. Glycerol-mediated repression of glucose metabolism and glycerol kinase as the sole route of glycerol catabolism in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 191:4307–4315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sprague G. F., Cronan J. E. 1977. Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiaemutants defective in glycerol catabolism. J. Bacteriol. 129:1335–1342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Stroud R. M., et al. 2003. Glycerol facilitator GlpF and the associated aquaporin family of channels. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13:424–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Uthandi S., Saad B., Humbard M. A., Maupin-Furlow J. A. 2010. LccA, an archaeal laccase secreted as a highly stable glycoprotein into the extracellular medium by Haloferax volcanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:733–743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Varga M. E., Weiner J. H. 1995. Physiological role of GlpB of anaerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73:147–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wegmann K., Ben Amotz A., Avron M. 1980. Effect of temperature on glycerol retention in the halotolerant algae Dunaliellaand Asteromonas. Plant Physiol. 66:1196–1197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zeng G., Ye S., Larson T. J. 1996. Repressor for the sn-glycerol 3-phosphate regulon of Escherichia coliK-12: primary structure and identification of the DNA-binding domain. J. Bacteriol. 178:7080–7089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



