Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Medical Microbiology
. 2011 Jun;60(Pt 6):817–827. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.028126-0

Microbial community and metabolomic comparison of irritable bowel syndrome faeces

Kannan Ponnusamy 1, Jung Nam Choi 1, Jiyoung Kim 1, Sun-Young Lee 2, Choong Hwan Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC3167923  PMID: 21330412

Abstract

Human health relies on the composition of microbiota in an individual’s gut and the synthesized metabolites that may alter the gut environment. Gut microbiota and faecal metabolites are involved in several gastrointestinal diseases. In this study, 16S rRNA-specific denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and quantitative PCR analysis showed that the mean similarity of total bacteria was significantly different (P<0.001) in faecal samples from patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS; n = 11) and from non-IBS (nIBS) patients (n = 8). IBS subjects had a significantly higher diversity of total bacteria, as measured by the Shannon index (H′) (3.36<H′<4.37, P = 0.004), Bacteroidetes and lactobacilli; however, less diversity was observed for Bifidobacter (1.7< H′<3.08, P<0.05) and Clostridium coccoides (0.9< H′<2.98, P = 0.007). In this study, no significant difference was found in total bacterial quantity (P>0.05). GC/MS-based multivariate analysis delineated the faecal metabolites of IBS from nIBS samples. Elevated levels of amino acids (alanine and pyroglutamic acid) and phenolic compounds (hydroxyphenyl acetate and hydroxyphenyl propionate) were found in IBS. These results were highly correlated with the abundance of lactobacilli and Clostridium, which indicates an altered metabolism rate associated with these gut micro-organisms. A higher diversity of Bacteroidetes and Lactobacillus groups in IBS faecal samples also correlated with the respective total quantity. In addition, these changes altered protein and carbohydrate energy metabolism in the gut.

Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that results in abdominal pain, altered bowel habits and irregular stool characteristics. IBS cases have been reported worldwide, and it has been shown that adults and adolescents are more prone to developing IBS. In western European and North America, 10–15 % of the population have IBS, and 6.6 % of the Korean population are affected (Han et al., 2006). Although the aetiology of IBS has not yet been identified, it is believed that genetic, environmental, psycho-social and physiological factors, as well as an individual’s diet, may be responsible for IBS (Ohman & Simrén, 2007). In addition, recent studies have shown differences in the microbiota between IBS diarrhoea patients and healthy controls (Krogius-Kurikka et al., 2009). Short-chain fatty acids were found to be at higher levels in diarrhoea-predominant IBS patients than in other IBS patients (Mortensen et al., 1987).

Intestinal micro-organisms play various roles in human health such as complex food digestion, metabolizing drugs, detoxifying toxic compounds, producing essential vitamins and preventing colonization of pathogens. Most of the micro-organisms found in the GI tract are anaerobic bacteria, which are uncultivable under standard laboratory conditions. The type and number of bacteria in the GI tract varies depending on age, gender, geographical origin (Mueller et al., 2006) and environmental factors, such as diet and dietary supplements (Kajander et al., 2009). Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the dominant beneficial bacteria present in the normal human GI tract, and the latter was reported in lower numbers in constipation-predominant IBS patients (Rajilić-Stojanović et al., 2007). A variety of factors determine the intestinal residential and transient species populations (Heavey & Rowland, 1999). Therefore, the composition and proportion of individual bacterial populations, as well as metabolites, are continuously changing; in addition, the bacterial community depends on diet. As the GI tract harbours complex microbial, digested and non-digested food materials, micro-organisms cannot respond independently. Rather, group-specific bacteria act as a consortium and coordinate other competing microbials as well as the host metabolism, either positively or negatively. The general estimation of diversity and the selected beneficial and predominant community size may be correlated with healthy and diseased GI tracts. Metagenomics-based studies on microbial genomes in the GI tract have provided a more thorough understanding of the indigenous micro-organisms and their contribution to IBS. PCR was previously combined with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to provide more detailed information on microbial composition and diversity, and their specific roles in IBS (Rajilić-Stojanović et al., 2007).

Recent studies have shown that human symbiotic gut microbiota modulate the microbial phenotype and metabolites in faecal and urinary samples (Li et al., 2008). Thus, altered faecal metabolites not only reflect the status of the gut microbiome community but also bridge the relationships between symbiotic microbes and health. GC-MS has been applied successfully to analyse and interpret multiparametric metabolic responses in living systems, and pathophysiological and environmental perturbations (Gao et al., 2009; Scherling et al., 2010). Multivariate statistical analysis by partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) has been employed to elucidate significant differences and to screen for potential biomarkers that could account for the variance of biological samples (Gao et al., 2009).

Very little work has been conducted to compare the faecal microbial community and metabolites among IBS patients in the Korean population. A better understanding of the prevalent bacterial community and metabolites in faecal samples might be useful for either eliminating or restoring certain species to improve one’s health. Therefore, in the present study, we analysed and compared the indigenous faecal microbial community of IBS and non-IBS (nIBS) Korean subjects with faecal metabolites. The data presented here provide details about the complex GI bacterial shift and faecal metabolites, which could ultimately help delineate IBS from nIBS.

Methods

Study subjects.

Faecal samples were collected from 11 IBS (6 male, 5 female) and 8 nIBS (6 male, 2 female) patients, aged 18–74 years (mean 47.5 years) who were advised to follow a normal diet without any medications (see Supplementary Table S1 available with the online journal). The Rome II standard was followed to select the study subjects, and the exclusion criteria included inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and Behcet’s disease), GI malignancy and acute GI bleeding.

Bacterial community DNA extraction.

The collected faecal samples were frozen immediately (<5 min) at −20 °C and stored at −80 °C until used. Faecal community DNA was extracted as described in published studies (Apajalahti et al., 1998) and purified using a PowerClean DNA clean-up kit (Mo Bio Laboratories). The DNA concentration and purity were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies).

PCR amplification of total bacteria.

Total bacterial DNA was used for the amplification of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene using universal primers GC341F (341F with a GC clamp) and 907R as shown in Table 1. The PCR mixture (25 µl) contained 5 ng template DNA, 0.18 µM each primer, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 0.75 U Ex Taq polymerase (Takara) and reaction buffer with 2 mM MgCl2. The V3–V5 regions were amplified using GC clamp primers with an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 5 min, followed by touchdown PCR: 9 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 to 56 °C for 28 s at a ramp of −1 °C per cycle and 72 °C for 50 s; and then 15 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 28 s and 72 °C for 50 s, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 15 min. Two microlitres of the amplicon was analysed by (1.2 %, w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis prior to DGGE analysis.

Table 1. Universal and group-specific 16S rRNA gene-targeted primers and PCR/DGGE conditions.
Primer Sequence (5′→3′) Amplicon size (bp) PCR DGGE Target group Reference
Annealing temp (°C) Acrylamide (%) Gradient (%) Run
341F CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGCCG* 585 56 6 36–54 90 V/16 h Universal bacteria (16S rRNA gene variable regions V3–V5) Muyzer & Smalla (1998)
907R TCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT
BfraF GGTGTCGGCTTAAGTGCCAT 140 62 8 40–65 135 V/5 h Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas Rinttilä et al. (2004)
BfraR CGGA(C/T)GTAAGGGCCGTGC*
BifF GCGTGCTTAACACATGCAAGTC 125 60 8 40–70 135 V/5 h Bifidobacteria Zwielehner et al. (2009)
BifR CACCCGTTTCCAGGAGCTATT*
CoccoF AAATGACGGTACCTGACTAA 440 53 6 38–58 70 V/16 h Clostridium coccoides Matsuki et al. (2002)
CoccoR CTTTGAGTTTCATTCTTGCGAA*
LacF AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA 380 56 8 38–53 70 V/16 h Lactobacilli Vanhoutte et al. (2004)
LacR ATTYCACCGCTACACATG*

F, Forward; R, reverse.

*

GC clamp, CGCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCACGGGGGG.

Group-specific bacteria amplification.

The composition of selected probiotic and predominant bacterial groups such as Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacter, Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus groups was studied using group-specific amplifications to compare the individual communities with the total bacteria. The primers and PCR conditions for group-specific amplification are described in Table 1.

DGGE.

DGGE was performed using a DCode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad). Briefly, PCR samples were applied to polyacrylamide gels in 1× TAE with a urea and formamide denaturing gradient [7 M urea and 40 % (v/v) formamide corresponded to the 100 % gradient] as described by Muyzer & Smalla (1998). Electrophoresis was carried out at 60 °C with a constant voltage, as described in Table 1. The gels were stained with SYBR Green I (Invitrogen), observed under UV transillumination and documented with a Molecular Imager GelDoc system (Bio-Rad). The PCR amplicons of type strains and a representative study sample were included as markers to provide a possible indication of the identities and to compare bands between the gels. The following type strains were obtained from the Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC) or Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC): Bacteroides fragilis (KCTC 3688), Bacteroides vulgatus (KCTC 2639), Bifidobacterium breve (KCTC 3220), Bifidobacterium longum (KACC 20597), Campylobacter jejuni (KCTC 5327), Clostridium clostridioforme (KCTC 5572), Enterococcus faecalis (KACC 13807), Escherichia coli (KCTC 1682), Lactobacillus acidophilus (KACC 12419), Lactobacillus casei (KACC 12413) and Ruminococcus productus (KCTC 3695).

Analysis of microbial community fingerprints and sequencing.

Similarities between the DNA fingerprints were detected using Fingerprinting II software (Bio-Rad). Clustering was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (Dsc) and UPGMA. The general biodiversity of the Shannon index (H′) and the concentration of the dominance or Simpson index (D or S) were calculated based on the number of bands and their relative intensities among the individual samples. Distinct bands (total of 40) were excised, amplified by PCR with primers 341F (without the GC clamp) and 907R, purified with an AccuPrep PCR purification kit (Bioneer) and sequenced (Macrogen). The mean, sd and sem were calculated for each experiment. Student’s t-test (unequal variances, two-tailed) was applied for statistical analysis and P values <0.05 were considered significant. Multivariate statistics was performed using the supervised principal component analysis (PCA) using simca-p+ version 12 (Umetrics).

Phylogenetic analysis.

The sequences obtained were checked using ChromasPro (Technelysium) and Sequence scanner version 1.0 (Applied Biosystems) to remove redundant sequences. The partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared with those in GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), the Ribosomal Database Project II (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) and Eztaxon (www.eztaxon-e.org). Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the neighbour-joining method by performing 1000 bootstrap analyses using mega4.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

The qPCR mixture (25 µl) consisted of 1× SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara), ROX reference dye II, 0.18 µM each group-specific primer, 2 mM MgCl2 and 10 ng DNA template. The amplification programme comprised an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, primer annealing at 55–68 °C (Table 2) for 20 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s. The fluorescence data were collected at the end of each PCR cycle and experiments were carried out in triplicate using a 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Melting-curve analysis was carried out to determine the specificity of the PCR products. The melting curves were obtained by slowly heating the sample from 60 to 95 °C at a rate of 0.1 °C s−1, with continuous fluorescence collection. The fluorescence was compared with the external standard, and the efficiency of amplification of each primer was tested with the appropriate positive and negative controls. The type strains were used to construct the standard curve and the results were converted into the log value of the target bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (g faecal sample)−1.

Table 2. List of primers and PCR conditions used for quantification of faecal bacteria using qPCR.
Target group* Sequence (5′→3′) Size (bp) Annealing temp (°C) Mg2+ (millimoles l−1) Reference
Universal bacteria† F: ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAG 468 60 2 Zwielehner et al. (2009)
R: GACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCC
Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas See Table 1 140 68 2 Rinttilä et al. (2004)
Bifidobacteria§ See Table 1 125 60 2 Zwielehner et al. (2009)
Clostridium coccoides|| F: CGGTACCTGACTAAGAAGC 429 55 2 Rinttilä et al. (2004)
R: AGTTTYATTCTTGCGAACG
Lactobacilli¶ F: AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA 341 58 2 Walter et al. (2001)
R: CACCGCTACACATGGAG

F, Forward; R, reverse.

*

The following type strains were used as positive controls: †, Enterococcus faecalis (KACC 13807); ‡, Bacteroides vulgatus (KCTC 2639); §, Bifidobacterium longum; (KACC 20597); ||, R. productus (KCTC 3695); ¶, L. acidophilus (KACC 12419).

Faecal metabolite extraction and derivatization.

Faecal samples (0.1 g) were homogenized with 300 µl methanol (4 °C) for metabolomic analysis. The samples were vortexed for 1 min, ultrasonicated for 30 min and vortexed again for 1 min prior to centrifugation at 16 000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Faecal extracts, which were derivatized in two steps to protect carbonyl functions, were dried in a freezing dryer (12 h). First, the dried samples were dissolved in 100 µl of a solution of methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg ml−1; Sigma) and incubated at 75 °C for 30 min. The volatility of polar compounds was increased by exchanging acidic protons against the trimethylsilyl group using 100 µl N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide (Sigma) at 70 °C for 30 min.

GC-MS-based metabolite profiling.

Each 1 µl of the derivatives were injected in a split mode (1 : 25) into a Varian CP-3800 GC system coupled with a Varian 4000 ion-trap electron ionization/chemical ionization mass spectrometric detector system. A VF-1MS capillary column (30 m×0.25 mm) with 0.25 µm coating and equipped with an integrated 10 m guard column (Varian) was used to separate the derivative metabolites. The initial oven temperature was held at 100 °C for 2 min and then ramped to 300 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1 and held for 7 min. Helium (purity >99.999 %) was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The temperatures of the electron ionization ion source and injector were set to 200 and 250 °C, respectively. Electron impact ionization (70 eV) was utilized, and mass data were collected in a full-scan mode (m/z 50–1000). The metabolites were identified by comparison with the nist 2005 database version 2.0 (FairCom).

Metabolite data analysis.

The raw GC-MS data were converted into CDF (NetCDF) files and processed using the xcms toolbox for automatic peak detection and alignment. For multivariate statistical analysis, the xcms output was further processed using Microsoft Excel. The data were arranged on a three-dimensional matrix consisting of arbitrary peak index (retention time–m/z pairs), sample names (observations) and peak area (variables).

The resulting three-dimensional data table was entered into the simca-p+ version 12.0 software package for multivariate statistical analysis. The supervised PLS-DA model was used to maximize metabolite variations and identify significantly altered metabolites responsible for such variations (Gao et al., 2009). These values were further validated by Student’s t-test using statistica version 7.0 (StatSoft). The metabolites with variable importance projection (VIP) values >1.0 and P values <0.05 (threshold) were selected as metabolites that could discriminate between IBS and nIBS patients.

Results

Faecal microbial community

PCR amplification and the DGGE profile of total bacteria of the representative faecal samples had a band similarity coefficient of >95 %. Thus, these samples were determined to be basically identical, and the individual sample aliquots were pooled together and used. Significant differences were observed in the banding pattern between IBS (predominant number of bands: 16.9±3.8) and nIBS (9.9±3.5) subjects (P<0.001) as well as between the faecal samples. The DGGE pattern showed that diarrhoea-predominant and constipation-predominant faecal samples were mixed in the IBS samples. The intensity of the bands was approximately 42 % higher in the IBS subjects than in the nIBS subjects.

Diversity and dominant bacteria.

DGGE profiles were used to calculate similarities between the samples and with the selected groups. Dsc was calculated and clustered, and each sample was compared with the other samples present in the same subject. The mean similarity indices of total bacteria revealed that greater biological variability of predominant bacteria was higher in the IBS samples (59.3±12 %) than in the nIBS samples (42.2±11.4 %) (Fig. 1). The statistical analysis also indicated a significant difference (P<0.001) between the IBS and nIBS subjects. The highest microbial diversity (3.36<H′<4.37, P = 0.004; Fig. 2a) and dominance (0.88<D<0.947, P<0.05; Fig. 2b) were observed in the IBS sample. In the qPCR analysis, no significant difference (P>0.05) in the total quantity was found (Fig. 3). Three main clusters were observed in the DGGE profile, where 90 % of the IBS samples were clustered together. Among the IBS samples, most of the males and females were clustered separately (Fig. 4a). The diverse dataset was grouped based on the variance, and nIBS samples were separated from IBS samples in the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), which were approximately 26 and 31 %, respectively (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Dice coefficient pairwise comparisons of total bacteria (using universal bacterial primers) and Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus groups in the IBS versus nIBS faecal community. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.001. White bars, nIBS; grey bars, IBS.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Diversity indices derived from DGGE fingerprinting of 16S rRNA gene-coding regions for total bacteria and the Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus groups. (a) Shannon index of general diversity (H′). (b) Simpson index of dominance (D or S). *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01. White bars, nIBS; grey bars, IBS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Box and whisker plot showing the quantitative estimation of universal bacteria and group-specific bacteria determined by qPCR. IBS samples were compared with nIBS samples and the values were expressed as the mean log 16S rRNA gene copy number (g faeces)−1. The plot displays the following: mean (line inside the box; its position away from the centre represents the degree of skewness in the data), sem (±1 times large box) and sd (‘whiskers’ extending from the upper and lower edges). White bars, nIBS; grey bars, IBS.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(a) Dendrogram showing the DGGE profiles of the IBS and nIBS faecal bacterial communities. Community DNA was detected by PCR amplification with universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V3–V5 regions) primers followed by DGGE. The dendrogram was constructed using Dsc and the UPGMA algorithm. The arrow indicates the eluted band of Eubacterium biforme. (b) PCA of DGGE fingerprints of the 16S rRNA gene of dominant bacteria in IBS (□) and nIBS (▴) samples.

The majority of the dominant band sequences (52.5 %) displayed >97 % similarity with known sequences in the database. The most abundant bacterial groups detected were members of the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes (see Supplementary Fig. S1 with the online journal). Among the dominant bands, 86 % (12/14) had >98 % similarity with the known sequences in the database and were found in both of the study groups. Fingerprinting analysis showed that Eubacterium biforme was present exclusively in the IBS subjects (Fig. 4a). The band intensity of Eubacterium biforme varied among the samples (2.5–25 %) and its relative quantity varied from 1.3 to 9.5 % among the individual faecal samples.

The predominant Bacteroidetes (Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas) group.

The overall gene diversity was 15 % higher in the IBS samples than in the nIBS samples (Fig. 2a). Based on qPCR analysis, the content of Bacteroidetes was 15 % higher in the IBS samples than in the nIBS samples. Bacteroidetes-specific DGGE profiles were not consistently observed among the subjects and they varied dramatically between samples as well as between the two groups. As the diversity was sample specific, 64 % of the IBS and 50 % of the nIBS subjects were grouped into mixed clusters. In the PCA analysis, nIBS was grouped into PC1 (51 %). Different species of Prevotella were identified with >96 % identity using the database. Bacteroides xylanisolvens was identified in clustered IBS samples (64 %), with a relative concentration ranging from 7.5 to 20 % in the individual samples. Bacteroides fragilis was mostly associated with the male IBS samples (4–20 %).

Lactobacillus group.

The high Dsc values suggested that all the nIBS subjects shared a major portion of the band set, whilst the IBS samples had unique bands, as indicated by the low Dsc values (Fig. 1). The Lactobacillus diversity was higher in the IBS samples than in the nIBS samples (Fig. 2). Similarly, the total quantity was about 15 % higher in the IBS subjects than the nIBS subjects. The variances of the IBS subjects were grouped by PC1 (30 %). Lactobacillus ruminis was commonly identified in more than half of the IBS samples and had a relative abundance of 5–8 % in the individual IBS samples and a 14–31 % mean band intensity. Weissella confusa was widely distributed in all the faecal samples, but a higher band density was observed in the nIBS (57 %) than the IBS (43 %) samples.

The PCR-DGGE fingerprint showed that the mean number of bifidobacteria was higher in the nIBS samples (75 %) than the IBS samples. A similar trend was observed for its diversity (22 %; P<0.05) but not in its dominance (11 %; P<0.05) for the nIBS samples (Fig. 2a, b). Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum was commonly observed in the faecal samples and had a relative abundance of 6–31 % in the individual samples. The variation in mean band intensity was 60 and 40 % in the IBS and nIBS samples, respectively. Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum were also observed in the faecal samples.

Clostridium coccoides group.

Clostridium coccoides and related species were detected in all the faecal community DNA. In the analysis of Dsc, a mean of 29 and 40.9 % was determined for the IBS and nIBS samples, respectively, where the latter was 29 % higher, which was numerically significant (P<0.05) (Fig. 1). The Shannon index reflected the complete microbial community, and a mean value of 2.73 was observed in the nIBS samples, which was twice as large as the value for the IBS samples (P = 0.007; Fig. 2a). The Simpson index of dominance was also 41 % higher in the nIBS sample (P<0.05; Fig. 2b). However, there was no difference between the subjects in terms of the total quantity of bacteria. Blautia wexlerae (about 94 % similarity) was commonly found in most of the samples (IBS, 73 %; nIBS, 78 %) and constituted up to 48 % among the individual samples.

Non-targeted metabolite analysis of the faecal extracts

A total of 1313 peaks were observed when the metabolite profile of the faecal extracts was analysed by xcms from the GC-MS ion chromatograms. The significant differences between IBS and nIBS samples were identified using the mass peak intensities of all the detected metabolites, which were expressed in a score plot for PLS-DA (Fig. 5a) and loading S-plots (Fig. 5b). Both upregulation and downregulation of metabolites were observed in IBS versus nIBS samples. The results are summarized in Supplementary Table S2 (available with the online journal).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

PLS-DA score plots (a) and PLS-DA loading S-plots (b) of significantly different metabolites derived from GC-MS analysis datasets of faecal extracts. (a) •, nIBS; ▴, IBS. (b) •, nIBS-related biomarkers; ▴, IBS-related biomarkers; ▪, unidentified biomarkers.

Metabolic signature of IBS and gut microbiota

The statistical characterization of selected metabolites was related to the identified gut microbiota. Increased levels of amino acids, phenolic compounds, sugar alcohols and purines were observed in IBS faecal samples when compared with nIBS controls. The IBS faecal samples clearly showed higher levels of alanine, pyroglutamic acid, aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, hydroxyphenyl acetate, hydroxyphenyl propionate, glyceric acid and purines than those in nIBS (Fig. 6). In addition, significantly different metabolites (P<0.05) were observed in IBS, including glucopyranose and hydrocinnamic acid; however, these metabolites were not comparable to the currently available gut microbiota due to insufficient literature on gut bacteria and its metabolites. These differences in metabolites between IBS and nIBS faeces were highly correlated with changes in the gut microbiota and provide powerful evidence of the microbial diversity in IBS patients.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Hypothetical diagram showed a comparison of the faecal metabolites found and the major gut microbiota. The relative changes in IBS and nIBS faecal metabolites were derived from the GC-MS peak area and expressed as box and whisker plots. Positive and negative correlations are indicated as solid and dashed lines, respectively.

Discussion

The microbiota play a crucial role in the maintenance and regular function of the GI ecosystem. GI microbial communities are stable over a period of time in healthy people with a normal diet; moreover, the population of bacteria depends on individual subjects. Recent studies have shown that there is a high prevalence of IBS in Asians, which is comparable with the levels found in Western populations.

Analysis of the faecal bacterial diversity suggested that the species in the IBS samples were evenly distributed. The mean similarity between the subjects, as well as in the nIBS cases, was low (<50 %), in agreement with published reports (Codling et al., 2010). Three variable regions (V3–V5) of the 16S rRNA gene produced higher variability in the DGGE profile, which implied a low similarity. In contrast, V3-specific amplicons showed the greatest mean similarity (59.2 %) in the faecal bacterial community in Korean samples (Nam et al., 2008). The Dice similarity and UPGMA analyses of the total bacterial DGGE profiles indicated that the nIBS samples were clustered into two groups.

Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most dominant beneficial microbiota present in the normal human GI tract; in addition, the latter has been shown to be higher in IBS samples (Krogius-Kurikka et al., 2009). The total Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas quantity determined in this study was in agreement with previous studies, which have reported a relatively increased abundance of these bacteria in elderly people and in those with infectious colitis (Zwielehner et al., 2009). Faecal carbohydrates and insufficient available nitrogen are the limiting factors for GI bacterial metabolism. Prevotella produces toxic materials under limiting nitrogen conditions, which is challenging to the survival of other bacteria. Transcriptional activation studies have emphasized the prevalence of Bacteroides sp. in other intestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (Rehman et al., 2010). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii produces aminobutyric acid, which is a crucial energy source for colonic epithelium and may enhance the integrity of the epithelial barrier and modulate the GI immune system (Lara-Villoslada et al., 2006). Butyrate has also been reported to modulate inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease patients, possibly by downregulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. F. prausnitzii might be important not only for its provision of butyrate to the host but also due to the release of high interleukin (IL-10/IL-12) cytokine levels (Schwiertz et al., 2010).

In the present study, Eubacterium biforme (belonging to Clostridium cluster XVI) was identified only in IBS subjects. It has been observed in the mucus of patients with Crohn’s disease and in lymphonodular hyperplasia of children (8.33 %) (Harrington et al., 2008). The high level of the sugar alcohol glyceric acid could have been released from triacylglycerols associated with the colon wall; in addition, the increased level of Eubacterium biforme in IBS may be responsible for the release of glyceric acids in the faeces, which indicates a shift in energy metabolism.

The genus Clostridium consists of a heterogeneous group of micro-organisms that can adapt to diverse habitats (Woodmansey et al., 2004). The Simpson index of dominance was higher in nIBS samples, which is in contrast to other intestinal diseases, and it was not found to be significantly different between Crohn’s disease and control groups (Scanlan et al., 2006). A similar instability of the Clostridium group has been observed, and no inter-individual differences between IBS samples were noted (Codling et al., 2010). Direct sequencing has demonstrated that the loss of normal anaerobic bacteria is responsible for the reduction in microbial diversity in IBS (Ott et al., 2004).

Bifidobacterial diversity experiments have shown that IBS samples are clustered separately from the higher diversity of nIBS subjects. The normal dietary fibre-consuming group contained more bifidobacteria than the group consuming less fibre (Benno et al., 1989). A decrease in the amount of dietary fibres consumed led to a reduction in bifidobacteria, which caused constipation in patients with IBS. Bifidobacterium is a well-documented taxon with regard to its phylogenetic and phenotypic characteristics (Schwiertz et al., 2010). Although the diversity was significantly higher in nIBS, no major difference was observed in terms of total number of bifidobacteria. Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic combinations have been reported to reduce the severity of IBS symptoms, and the prebiotics oligofructose and inulin selectively stimulate bifidobacterial growth and reduce constipation, predominant in IBS patients (Saggioro, 2004).

With regard to the Lactobacillus group, neither the IBS nor nIBS subjects clustered separately, as the diversity and abundance were higher in the IBS group but lower for the Dice similarity index. Among the selected 20 phylotypes, 3 different genera and 12 species were matched (>97 %) with either the type strains or isolates from fermented foods. Qin et al. (2010) reported that the abundance of many bacteria varies greatly within individuals over a period of time and even within the phylum level. It has been recognized that probiotic bacteria help human digestive health. However, modern and advanced tools have improved our understanding of bacterial niches and the influence of metabolites. It is understood that the colonic environment has different nutritional patterns and microbial ecosystems, which has a relationship with metabolic niches. The increased level of faecal d-alanine produced by lactic acid bacteria modulates the immune system in a colitis animal model (De Vos, 2005). The elevated levels of purine in faecal metabolites suggested extensive glycogenolysis and glycolysis; it also indicated increased microbial activity in either the proliferation or degradation of bacterial cells. In contrast, qPCR revealed that the quantity of lactobacilli was lower in nIBS patients than in the normal gut, but it was higher in IBS patients, and it has been suggested that lactobacilli and the secreted organic acids may cause IBS symptoms (Tana et al., 2010). The low level of alanine and pyroglutamic acid in nIBS indicates lowered bacterial protease and peptide catabolism, whereas Lactobacillus activity was increased in IBS, as evidenced by the elevated levels of faecal alanine released by protein catabolism (Romick-Rosendale et al., 2009). GI tract proteins are partially hydrolysed as a result of the acidic conditions of the GI tract and produce peptides, which are then broken down by gut microbial proteases to release amino acids (Romick-Rosendale et al., 2009). There are two possible reasons for the elevated levels of faecal amino acids: one is catabolism of peptides by the higher bacterial load; the second is malabsorption of amino acids in IBS patients. The elevated level of gut bacteria is also reflected in energy metabolism changes, thus stimulating gut carbohydrate metabolism. When the carbohydrates and free amino acids are replaced by protein/peptides, the fermented phenolic compounds were increased in the faeces. Lactobacilli produce pyroglutamic acid, bacteriocin, lactic acid and acetic acid, which act as antimicrobials and also lower the pH levels, thus preventing the colonization by other bacterial communities (Engberg et al., 2000; Salonen et al., 2010). Fermentation of tyrosine by proteolytic bacteria ends with phenol products. This metabolic signature is similar to that observed in conditions of stress and trauma under the influence of human physiological changes.

The low level of alanine and pyroglutamic acid in nIBS indicates a lowered level of bacterial protease and peptide catabolism, whereas Lactobacillus activity is increased in IBS, indicated by the elevated levels of faecal alanine released by protein catabolism (Romick-Rosendale et al., 2009). The IBS samples displayed higher levels of hydroxyphenyl acetate and hydroxyphenyl propionate, which are converted from phenylalanine and plant phenolic compounds by Clostridium spp. as intermediates (Winter et al., 1991). The increased level of aminobutyric acid in IBS was strongly correlated with the presence of F. prausnitzii, which was the most significant n-butyrate-producing gut bacterium, with well-known effects on host energy metabolism and mucosal integrity (Li et al., 2008; Pryde et al., 2002).

In conclusion, we systematically examined the microbial community and metabolites in faecal samples of IBS and nIBS Korean subjects. Our results demonstrated a clear discrepancy between the faecal microbial diversity and richness measured as the presence of 16S rRNA gene signatures of bacteria and their metabolic activities. Key bacterial communities were shown to be significantly different in diversity and dominance between IBS and nIBS samples. The diversity and quantity were inter-linked only in the Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus groups. The higher levels of amino acids and phenolic compounds indicated increased bacterial metabolism and also altered energy by the predominant gut microbiota.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, under the Basic Science Research Program (grant no. 2009-0072398) and received financial support from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (grant no. R01-2007-000-20231-0), and partially by the Basic Science Research Program (grant no. 2010-0019306) and Priority Research Centers Program (grant no. 2009-093824), Republic of Korea.

Abbreviations:

DGGE

denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Dsc

Dice similarity coefficient

GI

gastrointestinal

H′

Shannon index

IBS

irritable bowel syndrome

KACC

Korean Agricultural Culture Collection

KCTC

Korean Collection for Type Cultures

nIBS

non-irritable bowel syndrome

PCA

principal component analysis

PLS-DA

partial least-squares discriminant analysis

qPCR

quantitative real-time PCR

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the IBS faecal microbiota studied are HQ018603–HQ018637.

Tables of patient demographics and IBS faecal metabolites, and a figure showing phylogenetic relationships, are available as supplementary material with the online version of this paper.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. Apajalahti J. H., Särkilahti L. K., Mäki B. R., Heikkinen J. P., Nurminen P. H., Holben W. E. (1998). Effective recovery of bacterial DNA and percent-guanine-plus-cytosine-based analysis of community structure in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 4084–4088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benno Y., Endo K., Mizutani T., Namba Y., Komori T., Mitsuoka T. (1989). Comparison of fecal microflora of elderly persons in rural and urban areas of Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 55, 1100–1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Codling C., O’Mahony L., Shanahan F., Quigley E. M., Marchesi J. R. (2010). A molecular analysis of fecal and mucosal bacterial communities in irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 55, 392–397 10.1007/s10620-009-0934-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Vos W. M. (2005). Lipotechoic acid in lactobacilli: d-alanine makes the difference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 10763–10764 10.1073/pnas.0504966102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engberg R. M., Hedemann M. S., Leser T. D., Jensen B. B. (2000). Effect of zinc bacitracin and salinomycin on intestinal microflora and performance of broilers. Poult Sci 79, 1311–1319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gao X., Pujos-Guillot E., Martin J. F., Galan P., Juste C., Jia W., Sebedio J. L. (2009). Metabolite analysis of human fecal water by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with ethyl chloroformate derivatization. Anal Biochem 393, 163–175 10.1016/j.ab.2009.06.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han S. H., Lee O. Y., Bae S. C., Lee S. H., Chang Y. K., Yang S. Y., Yoon B. C., Choi H. S., Hahm J. S., et al. (2006). Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in Korea: population-based survey using the Rome II criteria. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21, 1687–1692 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04269.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrington C. R., Lucchini S., Ridgway K. P., Wegmann U., Eaton T. J., Hinton J. C., Gasson M. J., Narbad A. (2008). A short-oligonucleotide microarray that allows improved detection of gastrointestinal tract microbial communities. BMC Microbiol 8, 195 10.1186/1471-2180-8-195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heavey P. M., Rowland I. R. (1999). The gut microflora of the developing infant: microbiology and metabolism. Microb Ecol Health Dis 11, 75–83 10.1080/089106099435808 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kajander K., Myllyluoma E., Kyrönpalo S., Rasmussen M., Sipponen P., Mattila I., Seppänen-Laakso T., Vapaatalo H., Oresic M., Korpela R. (2009). Elevated pro-inflammatory and lipotoxic mucosal lipids characterise irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 15, 6068–6074 10.3748/wjg.15.6068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krogius-Kurikka L., Lyra A., Malinen E., Aarnikunnas J., Tuimala J., Paulin L., Mäkivuokko H., Kajander K., Palva A. (2009). Microbial community analysis reveals high level phylogenetic alterations in the overall gastrointestinal microbiota of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome sufferers. BMC Gastroenterol 9, 95 10.1186/1471-230X-9-95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lara-Villoslada F., De Haro O., Camuesco D., Comalada M., Velasco J., Zarzuelo A., Xaus J., Galvez J. (2006). Short-chain fructooligosaccharides, in spite of being fermented in the upper part of the large intestine, have anti-inflammatory activity in the TNBS model of colitis. Eur J Nutr 45, 418–425 10.1007/s00394-006-0610-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li M., Wang B., Zhang M., Rantalainen M., Wang S., Zhou H., Zhang Y., Shen J., Pang X., et al. (2008). Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 2117–2122 10.1073/pnas.0712038105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Matsuki T., Watanabe K., Fujimoto J., Miyamoto Y., Takada T., Matsumoto K., Oyaizu H., Tanaka R. (2002). Development of 16S rRNA-gene-targeted group-specific primers for the detection and identification of predominant bacteria in human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 5445–5451 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5445-5451.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mortensen P. B., Andersen J. R., Arffmann S., Krag E. (1987). Short-chain fatty acids and the irritable bowel syndrome: the effect of wheat bran. Scand J Gastroenterol 22, 185–192 10.3109/00365528708991878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueller S., Saunier K., Hanisch C., Norin E., Alm L., Midtvedt T., Cresci A., Silvi S., Orpianesi C., et al. (2006). Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 1027–1033 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1027-1033.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muyzer G., Smalla K. (1998). Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73, 127–141 10.1023/A:1000669317571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nam Y.-D., Chang H.-W., Kim K.-H., Roh S. W., Kim M.-S., Jung M.-J., Lee S.-W., Kim J.-Y., Yoon J.-H., Bae J.-W. (2008). Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal diversity in the intestines of Korean people. J Microbiol 46, 491–501 10.1007/s12275-008-0199-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ohman L., Simrén M. (2007). New insights into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Liver Dis 39, 201–215 10.1016/j.dld.2006.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ott S. J., Musfeldt M., Wenderoth D. F., Hampe J., Brant O., Fölsch U. R., Timmis K. N., Schreiber S. (2004). Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 53, 685–693 10.1136/gut.2003.025403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pryde S. E., Duncan S. H., Hold G. L., Stewart C. S., Flint H. J. (2002). The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 217, 133–139 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qin J., Li R., Raes J., Arumugam M., Burgdorf K. S., Manichanh C., Nielsen T., Pons N., Levenez F., et al. (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 10.1038/nature08821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajilić-Stojanović M., Smidt H., De Vos W. M. (2007). Diversity of the human gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Environ Microbiol 9, 2125–2136 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01369.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rehman A., Lepage P., Nolte A., Hellmig S., Schreiber S., Ott S. J. (2010). Transcriptional activity of the dominant gut mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory bowel disease patients. J Med Microbiol 59, 1114–1122 10.1099/jmm.0.021170-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rinttilä T., Kassinen A., Malinen E., Krogius L., Palva A. (2004). Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 97, 1166–1177 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02409.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Romick-Rosendale L. E., Goodpaster A. M., Hanwright P. J., Patel N. B., Wheeler E. T., Chona D. L., Kennedy M. A. (2009). NMR-based metabonomics analysis of mouse urine and fecal extracts following oral treatment with the broad-spectrum antibiotic enrofloxacin (Baytril). Magn Reson Chem 47 Suppl. 1S36–S46 10.1002/mrc.2511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Saggioro A. (2004). Probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 38 Suppl.S104–S106 10.1097/01.mcg.0000129271.98814.e2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Salonen A., De Vos W. M., Palva A. (2010). Gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: present state and perspectives. Microbiology 156, 3205–3215 10.1099/mic.0.043257-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Scanlan P. D., Shanahan F., O’Mahony C., Marchesi J. R. (2006). Culture-independent analyses of temporal variation of the dominant fecal microbiota and targeted bacterial subgroups in Crohn’s disease. J Clin Microbiol 44, 3980–3988 10.1128/JCM.00312-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scherling C., Roscher C., Giavalisco P., Schulze E. D., Weckwerth W. (2010). Metabolomics unravel contrasting effects of biodiversity on the performance of individual plant species. PLoS ONE 5, e12569 10.1371/journal.pone.0012569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schwiertz A., Jacobi M., Frick J. S., Richter M., Rusch K., Köhler H. (2010). Microbiota in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr 157, 240–244.e1 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tana C., Umesaki Y., Imaoka A., Handa T., Kanazawa M., Fukudo S. (2010). Altered profiles of intestinal microbiota and organic acids may be the origin of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22, 512–519, e114–e115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vanhoutte T., Huys G., Brandt E., Swings J. (2004). Temporal stability analysis of the microbiota in human feces by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis using universal and group-specific 16S rRNA gene primers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48, 437–446 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Walter J., Hertel C., Tannock G. W., Lis C. M., Munro K., Hammes W. P. (2001). Detection of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella species in human feces by using group-specific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 2578–2585 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2578-2585.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Winter J., Popoff M. R., Grimont P., Bokkenheuser V. D. (1991). Clostridium orbiscindens sp. nov., a human intestinal bacterium capable of cleaving the flavonoid C-ring. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41, 355–357 10.1099/00207713-41-3-355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Woodmansey E. J., McMurdo M. E., Macfarlane G. T., Macfarlane S. (2004). Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiotas in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 6113–6122 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6113-6122.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zwielehner J., Liszt K., Handschur M., Lassl C., Lapin A., Haslberger A. G. (2009). Combined PCR-DGGE fingerprinting and quantitative-PCR indicates shifts in fecal population sizes and diversity of Bacteroides, bifidobacteria and Clostridium cluster IV in institutionalized elderly. Exp Gerontol 44, 440–446 10.1016/j.exger.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES