Skip to main content
Genes & Development logoLink to Genes & Development
. 1998 Jun 1;12(11):1691–1704. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.11.1691

Multistep signaling requirements for pituitary organogenesis in vivo

Mathias Treier 1, Anatoli S Gleiberman 1,2,5, Shawn M O’Connell 1,5, Daniel P Szeto 1,3, Jill A McMahon 4, Andrew P McMahon 4, Michael G Rosenfeld 1,6
PMCID: PMC316866  PMID: 9620855

Abstract

During development of the mammalian pituitary gland specific hormone-producing cell types, critical in maintaining homeostasis, emerge in a spatially and temporally specific fashion from an ectodermal primordium. We have investigated the molecular basis of generating diverse pituitary cell phenotypes from a common precursor, providing in vivo and in vitro evidence that their development involves three sequential phases of signaling events and the action of a gradient at an ectodermal boundary. In the first phase, the BMP4 signal from the ventral diencephalon, expressing BMP4, Wnt5a, and FGF8, represents a critical dorsal neuroepithelial signal for pituitary organ commitment in vivo. Subsequently, a BMP2 signal emanates from a ventral pituitary organizing center that forms at the boundary of a region of oral ectoderm in which Shh expression is selectively excluded. This BMP2 signal together with a dorsal FGF8 signal, appears to create opposing activity gradients that are suggested to generate overlapping patterns of specific transcription factors underlying cell lineage specification events, whereas Wnt4 is needed for the expansion of ventral pituitary cell phenotypes. In the third phase, temporally specific loss of the BMP2 signal is required to allow terminal differentiation. The consequence of these sequential organ and cellular determination events is that each of the hormone-producing pituitary cell types—gonadotropes, thyrotropes, somatotropes, lactotropes, corticotropes, and melanotropes—appear to be determined, in a ventral-to-dorsal gradient, respectively.

Keywords: Pituitary, organogenesis, cell phenotype, transcription factor, BMP, FGF, Wnt


The anterior pituitary gland exerts its pivotal roles in homeostatic regulation of vertebrates by signaling to peripheral organs, such as the adrenal gland and thyroid gland under control of the endocrine hypothalamus (for review, see Treier and Rosenfeld 1996). The mature gland contains six hormone-producing cell types, including corticotropes secreting adrenocorticotropin (ACTH); melanotropes secreting melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH); thyrotropes secreting thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH); gondadotropes secreting luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH); somatotropes secreting growth hormone (GH); and lactotropes secreting prolactin. FSH, LH, and TSH are heterodimeric peptide hormones that share a common subunit referred to as α-glycoprotein subunit αGSU (for review, see Voss and Rosenfeld 1992). These cell types emerge from a common primordium in a precise spatial and temporal pattern (Simmons et al. 1990; Japon et al. 1994); because of the well-defined nature of these cell types the pituitary gland has provided an excellent model system in which to investigate the molecular mechanisms that underlie the appearance of distinct cell phenotypes during mammalian organogenesis.

The anterior pituitary gland arises as a midline structure from the anterior neural ridge immediately anterior to the adjacent region of the neural plate from which the hypothalamus and posterior pituitary will develop (Couly and Le Dourain 1988; Eagelson and Harris 1990). A number of transcription factors are expressed in the area of the pituitary primordium including Six-3 (Oliver et al. 1995), PAX-6 (Walther and Gruss 1991), and Rpx/Hesx1 (Thomas et al. 1995; Hermesz et al. 1996), all of which continue their expression in the oral ectodermal field and in Rathke’s pouch, which first appears as an invagination of the oral ectoderm, making direct cell–cell contact with the neuroepithelium of the nascent diencephalon at embryonic days 8.5–9.0 (E8.5–9.0) in mouse development (Jacobsen et al. 1979). Concurrent with organ commitment, a LIM–homeodomain factor, Lhx3 (Zhadanov et al. 1995), also referred to as P-Lim (Bach et al. 1995), is expressed in a fashion restricted to Rathke’s pouch, as well as the related factor Lhx4 (Sheng et al. 1997). Deletion of the Lhx-3/P-Lim gene in mice results in failure of the pituitary gland to grow and differentiate, although Rathke’s pouch forms (Sheng et al. 1996), whereas a double gene deletion for both Lhx3 and Lhx4 results in failure in formation of Rathke’s pouch (Sheng et al. 1997). The OTX related factor Ptx1/P-OTX (Lamonerie et al. 1996; Szeto et al. 1996) is also expressed throughout early pituitary development, whereas a nuclear receptor, SF1, appears to be expressed later in the nascent gonadotrope lineage (Luo et al. 1994). A tissue-specific POU domain factor Pit-1 is required for terminal differentiation, growth, and survival of somatotropes, lactotropes, and thyrotropes (Li et al. 1990) and is expressed ventrally on E13.5 in the caudomedial region of the nascent gland that will express growth hormone, prolactin, and TSHβ, with thyrotropes being the most ventral of the three Pit-1 producing cell types (Simmons et al. 1990; Japon et al. 1994). In addition, a paired-like homeodomain factor Prop-1 proved to be required for determination of the Pit-1 lineage (Sornson et al. 1996). Whereas these studies have begun to elucidate the transcription factors responsible for critical aspects of pituitary gland development, the extracellular signals that dictate the serial events required for pituitary organogenesis remain undefined.

The application of genetic approaches to development, initially in Drosophila, led to discovery of both transcription factors and the signaling molecules Decapentaplegic (Dpp), Wingless (Wg), and Hedgehog (Hh) critical for initial pattern formation, including dorsal and ventral patterning (for review, see Rusch and Levine 1996), and later development of numerous systems and structures derived from imaginal discs (for review, see Lawrence and Struhl 1996). The subsequent identification and study of their mammalian orthologs revealed a large family of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), Wnt, and Hh molecules. Their potential roles in mammalian development and organogenesis has received intensive attention in the past few years, with evidence of their involvement in several models including limb (for review, see Johnson and Tabin 1997), spinal cord (for review, see Tanabe and Jessell 1996), and tooth development (for review, see Thesleff and Sharpe 1997), as well as in somite patterning (for review, see Bumcrot and McMahon 1995). Similarly, roles for the large family of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) in early mammalian development and in organogenesis have been suggested (for review, see Tabin 1995).

In this paper we have used several experimental approaches to understand the serial signaling events that might underlie the process of pituitary development from initial organ commitment to the appearance of mature cell phenotypes. We report that BMP4, Wnt5a, and FGF8 are expressed in distinct, overlapping patterns in the ventral diencephalon, whereas Shh, initially expressed uniformly in the oral ectoderm, is excluded from the developing Rathke’s pouch, creating a molecular boundary within the continuous ectoderm from which a ventral-to-dorsal gradient of BMP2 arises. We provide in vivo and in vitro evidence that BMP4 is required for the first phase of development—organ commitment of the pituitary gland, whereas the subsequent generation of opposing ventrodorsal BMP2/FGF8 gradients serve to dictate the second phase—determination of ventral cell phenotypes (gonadotropes and the Pit-1 lineage) and dorsal phenotypes (melanotropes and corticotropes), respectively. Finally, attenuation of the BMP2 signal is shown in vivo to be required for terminal differentiation of ventral cell types, the third phase of organogenesis. Thus, the well-described nature of the specific cell phenotypes within the pituitary gland have permitted interpretation of our in vivo experiments to propose a model for multistep signaling regulation of pituitary organogenesis.

Results

Signaling molecules in pituitary organogenesis

We initiated our investigation of early pituitary organogenesis by delineating the expression of potential signaling molecules in the neuroepithelium and subsequently the pituitary gland and/or surrounding mesenchyme, evaluating known members of the BMP, FGF, and Wnt gene families (Hogan 1996; Cadigan and Nusse 1997). BMP4 (Jones et al. 1991) and FGF8 (Crossley and Martin 1995), reported to be expressed in the infundibulum at E10.5, were found to be expressed in the ventral diencephalon during the initial development of Rathke’s pouch and subsequently in the infundibulum until emergence of specific cell lineages, with initial BMP4 expression detected temporally prior to the appearance of FGF8 (Fig. 1; data not shown). In addition, Wnt5a was found to be expressed throughout the diencephalon (Fig. 1), exhibiting a less restricted expression than BMP4 and FGF8. Wnt4 expression is also detected in Rathke’s pouch and is sustained later dorsally and ventrally through E14.5. The oral ectoderm appears to uniformingly express Shh; with the morphological appearance of Rathke’s pouch, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) expression was restricted out of the invaginating oral ectoderm, remaining expressed in the surrounding oral ectoderm until at least E11, and thus represents a molecular boundary at the morphological transition between the oral ectoderm and Rathke’s pouch (Fig. 1; data not shown). Because this pattern is reminiscent of the anterior–posterior compartment boundary in the Drosophila wing (Basler and Struhl 1994) in which Hh in posterior cells locally induces expression of Dpp in adjacent anterior cells, we investigated whether there might be similar induction of the expression of the Dpp counterparts, BMP2 or BMP4, in the adjacent Shh-nonexpressing cells of the nascent Rathke’s pouch. We found that initial expression of BMP2 was observed at the oral ectoderm/Rathke’s pouch boundary on E10.5 within Rathke’s pouch ectoderm and with expression in the adjacent mesenchyme; by E12.0 expression was continuous throughout Rathke’s pouch and in the underlying, condensing mesenchyme with attenuation of the signal by E13.5–14. These data were consistent with the possibility that a ventral BMP2 signal might be essential for the development of specific pituitary cell lineages. Furthermore, we found that one of the known BMP antagonists, chordin (Piccolo et al. 1996), is expressed in the mesenchyme caudal to the developing anterior pituitary gland.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

 Expression of signaling molecules during early stages of pituitary development. Schematic representation of different stages of pituitary development (a–d). In situ hybridization analysis for BMP4, FGF8, Wnt5a, BMP2, Wnt4, Sonic hedgehog (Shh), and chordin during early stages of pituitary development [embryonic day (e) of mouse development is indicated at top right of each panel]. BMP4 expression is detected early on in the ventral diencephalon and later in the infundibulum to subsequently disappear. FGF8 is expressed temporally later than BMP4 in the infundibulum. Wnt5a is expressed throughout the ventral diencephalon not showing any restriction. No BMP2 expression is detected early in the vicinity of Rathke’s pouch. At E10.5 BMP2 expression was detected in the most ventral part of Rathke’s pouch ectoderm and in some adjacent mesenchymal cells (arrows). By E12.0 BMP2 was expressed throughout Rathke’s pouch and in the underlying condensing mesenchymal cells. Two days later BMP2 expression is confined to the perilumenal cells in Rathke’s pouch and the underlying cartilage growth zone. Wnt4 expression is observed in the oral ectoderm and Rathke’s pouch throughout pituitary gland development. Shh expression is observed throughout the oral ectoderm, whereas the invaginating part of oral ectoderm that becomes Rathke’s pouch is void of any detectable expression, creating a molecular boundary between two ectodermal domains of Shh expressing and nonexpressing cells. The BMP antagonist chordin is expressed in the caudal mesenchyme (CM) adjacent to Rathke’s pouch. BMP2 and Wnt4 expression is noted in the condensing mesenchyme beginning at E12. (INF) infundibulum; (RP) Rathke’s pouch; (OE) oral ectoderm; (P) pituitary; (VD) ventral diencephalon.

In vitro requirement for ventral diencephalon in pituitary development

To further investigate the role of the ventral diencephalon in Rathke’s pouch development, we established a ventral diencephalon/Rathke’s pouch organ coculture system. Isolation and culturing of Rathke’s pouch explants from E9.5 embryos required cocultivation with ventral diencephalon from the same stage to achieve ACTH, Pit-1, and αGSU cell phenotypes (Fig. 2Aa,e,i); coculturing under identical conditions with COS cells could not replace this activity (Fig. 2Ac,g,k); only few ACTH-positive cells were detectable (Fig. 2Ac). In contrast, Rathke’s pouch cell explants from E10.5 embryos were capable of generating ACTH, Pit-1, and αGSU cell lineages, whether cultured in the presence or in the absence of the ventral diencephalon (Fig. 2Ab,d,f,h,j,l). These results imply that at ∼E10.5, the pituitary gland switches from an extrinsic (ventral diencephalon) to intrinsic (Rathke’s pouch) signaling mode that is required for cell lineage specification.

To investigate whether BMP4 or Wnt5a activity alone or together was sufficient to induce the α-glycoprotein subunit (αGSU) in E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants, we cultured E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants together with COS cells that were transfected with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-based expression vectors containing BMP4, Wnt5a, Shh, or FGF8 cDNAs, alone or in all possible dual combinations. Whereas BMP4, or to a lesser extend Wnt5a alone were only sporadically able to induce αGSU in the coculture system (Fig. 2Bf,g); the combination of BMP4 with Wnt5a was able to consistently induce robust expression of αGSU in these explants (Fig. 2B h). However, the coculture system proved unable to faithfully reproduce all aspects of later temporal events in pituitary development. For example, few TSHβ-producing cells were observed, even though Pit-1 expression was detected and growth-hormone-positive cells consistently appeared in these cultures. It is therefore likely that the coculture system does not fully maintain all of the three dimensional aspects of normal development, compelling in vivo experiments to evaluate signaling control of the entire process of pituitary organogenesis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

 BMP activity is required for anterior pituitary development. (A) Requirement for signaling from the ventral diencephalon in the induction of pituitary lineages. (a,e,i) Coculturing of E9.5 ventral diencephalon with E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explant for 6 days resulted in the appearance of all major lineages as shown by immunohistochemical staining with ACTH (a), Pit-1 (e), and αGSU (i) antisera. (b,f,j) Coculturing experiments done under the same conditions with explants from E10.5, respectively, resulted in the same outcome as in a,e, and i). (c,g,k) Coculturing E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants in the presence of COS cells for 6 days led to the appearance of only few ACTH-positive cells (arrows, c), no Pit-1 and αGSU-positive cells were detected (g,k). (d,h,l) Coculturing experiment done under the same conditions as under (c,g,and k) with Rathke’s pouch explants from E10.5, resulting in the appearance of ACTH (d)-, Pit-1 (h)-, and αGSU (l)-positive cells. Results are shown from n = 5 independent experiments. (B) Synergistic induction of αGSU expression through BMP and Wnt signaling. (a,e) E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants cultured in the presence of COS cells showed induction of only ACTH expression (a) as revealed by immunohistochemistry; no αGSU expression (e) is detectable. (b,c,f,g) Similar results were obtained as in a and e when E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants were cultured with COS cells secreting either BMP4 or Wnt5a alone. (d,h) Coculturing of COS cells producing both BMP4 and Wnt5a with E9.5 Rathke’s pouch explants resulted in induction of αGSU expression (h). Results are from n = 4 independent experiments. (C) Expression of a POTX–Noggin transgene leads to an arrest of pituitary development. (a) Wild-type (WT) littermate at E17.5 stained for ACTH. (b) Phenotypic appearance of the pituitary gland in a POTX-Noggin transgenic embryo at E17.5. The gland has not progressed beyond a single layer epithelium stage reminiscent of Rathke’s pouch at E10.0. A connection towards the oral cavity still remains. (c) Higher magnification of b. Arrows mark the few ACTH-positive cells that can be found in this gland. (d,e) Immunohistochemical staining of adjacent sections with αGSU and Pit-1 antisera, respectively. No positive cells for either of the two markers could be found. Four independent transgene-positive embryos from this stage of gestation were obtained with three showing an abnormal phenotype.

BMP4 is required for pituitary organ commitment in vivo

As gene deletions for BMP2 (Zhang and Bradley 1996) and BMP4 (Winnier et al. 1995) result in embryonic lethal phenotypes prior to any potential role in pituitary development, we took advantage of the fact that Noggin is reported to specifically and efficiently block the action of BMP2/BMP4 and only inefficiently BMP7, but not other known members of the TGFβ family (Zimmerman et al. 1996; Liem et al 1997), to investigate whether BMP signaling was required for initial pituitary organ commitment. In order to utilize such an in vivo approach, it was necessary to identify the regulatory sequences of an appropriate transcription unit that would selectively target a noggin transcription unit in an appropriate temporal and spatial fashion to Rathke’s pouch. We found that 8 kb of 5′ cis-regulatory information of the P-OTX/Ptx1 gene (Lamonerie et al. 1996; Szeto et al. 1996; Lanctot et al. 1997) was capable of specifically directing transgenic expression to the oral ectoderm and to Rathke’s pouch in transgenic animals (D.P. Szeto and M.G. Rosenfeld, unpubl.). This transcription unit permitted us to target misexpression of noggin in transgenic animals (Fig. 2C). In the noggin transgenic embryos the development of Rathke’s pouch was arrested, exhibiting a morphological appearance resembling an E10 Rathke’s pouch, even at E17.5 (Fig. 2C). Immunohistochemical staining for cell-type-specific markers revealed that neither αGSU- nor Pit-1-positive cells could be identified, with only a few ACTH-positive cells detectable. This phenotype very closely resembles that reported for the LIM homeodomain factor Lhx3/P-Lim gene-deleted mouse (Sheng et al. 1996), which is induced in the Shh nonexpressing ectoderm after contact with the neuroepithelium, and which has been interpreted to reflect a failure of initial organ commitment and proliferation events. Based on our current understanding of noggin function and the fact that BMP4, but not BMP2 or BMP7, could be detected in the neuroepithelium at this time, our data strongly suggest that BMP4 activity is itself required for initial organ commitment and development of the pituitary anlage.

BMP2 signal requirement for the Pit-1 lineage

The appearance of BMP2 on E10.5 at the ventral limit of the presumptive Rathke’s pouch at the Shh boundary next raised the issue of the role of BMP2, and suggested that its expression in the developing gland might be a critical component of the loss of dependence on the ventral diencephalon signaling after E10.5. To gain functional insight into the potential role of the endogenous BMP2 activity in subsequent cell-type determination, we took advantage of the fact that BMP signaling is mediated through a BMP receptor (BMPR) system of type I and type II receptors, which both have low affinity for their ligand and only together achieve high affinity binding (for review, see Massagué 1996) and therefore is susceptible to a dominant-negative approach. Although 4.6 kb of 5′ cis-regulatory information of the αGSU gene, expressed early in Rathke’s pouch development (Simmons et al. 1990; Kendall et al. 1994), have been reported to target to all the cells of Rathke’s pouch (Kendall et al. 1994), we used 14 kb of 5′ cis-regulatory information of the αGSU gene to more efficiently misexpress a dominant-negative BMPR1A receptor (Suzuki et al. 1994) in transgenic animals prior to cell type determination. We chose this BMPR isoform because it was previously shown that this receptor specifically binds to BMP2 and BMP4, but not activins (for review, see Massague 1996). Mice expressing the transgene exhibited a dwarf phenotype. Analysis of the pituitary gland showed a highly hypoplastic phenotype, effecting primarily the anterior lobe (Fig. 3). In situ hybridization revealed that the Pit-1 lineage was almost completely absent (Fig. 3e,f,g,l,m,n); with only rare positive cell clones, similar to the few remaining clusters of Pit-1 lineage cells described in the Prop-1-defective, Ames (df) mouse (Gage et al. 1996; Sornson et al. 1996). In contrast, the remaining cells in the anterior lobe expressed either POMC (Fig. 3b,i) or αGSU (Fig. 3c,j) and the dominant-negative BMPR transgene, as shown by hybridization with a transgene-specific probe (human GH) [hGH Fig. 3a,h], with a substantial percentage of αGSU-positive cells also positive for the gonadotrope-specific markers LHβ and FSHβ (Fig. 3d,k; data not shown). Because the dominant-negative receptor can function only in a cell-autonomous fashion, this result further implies that the precursors of the Pit-1 lineage are initially temporally specified as αGSU-positive cells, as terminally differentiated GH- and prolactin-positive cells do not express αGSU, consistent with a broad, early pattern of αGSU expression (Simmons et al. 1990; Kendall et al. 1994). Whereas the αGSU population was clearly diminished, determination of the gonadotrope lineage was consistently observed, as might be expected because the dominant-negative receptor would be least effective in inhibiting highest levels of BMP activity most ventrally, where the gonadotrope lineage originates.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

 Role of endogenous BMP activity in cell-type determination. Pituitary phenotype of mice expressing the αGSU–ΔBMPR transgene. Pituitaries of a 8-week-old αGSU–ΔBMPR transgenic mouse (h–n) and its wild-type littermate (a–g) are shown. In situ analysis for Pit-1 (e,l) and the trophic hormones POMC (b,i), αGSU (c,j), LH (d,k), TSHβ (f,m) and GH (g,n), as well as a transgene specific probe hGH (a,h) are shown. The asterisk (*) in b marks the intermediate lobe that expresses POMC at such a high level that the region is overexposed and hence black. Three independent founders exhibited a dwarf phenotype.

Wnt4 is involved in pituitary cell-type expansion

Of the known Wnt family members we could detect only low levels of Wnt4 transcripts during pituitary development. As shown in Figure 4, analysis of Wnt4−/− mice (Stark et al. 1994) at E17.5 revealed a clear reduction in cell number in the anterior pituitary gland of Wnt4 mutant animals compared to their wild-type littermates. Immunohistochemical analysis exhibited a drastic reduction in number of the ventral αGSU, TSHβ, and GH cell populations, without alteration in dorsal ACTH-expressing corticotropes. Therefore, we propose that Wnt4 alone, or together with yet unkown members of the Wnt family, represents an intrinsic signaling molecule required for at least the expansion of some pituitary-cell-type precursors, analogous to the role proposed for other Wnt family members in various developmental systems, such as the requirement for Wnt signaling in expansion of neural crest and CNS progenitors (Ikeya et al. 1997).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Wnt4 affects cell type expansion in the pituitary gland. Pituitary phenotype in Wnt4−/− mutant animals at E17.5 (e–h) compared to wild-type littermate (a–d). Immunohistochemical analysis for the trophic hormones ACTH (a,e), GH (b,f), TSHβ (c,g), and αGSU (d,h) are shown. Arrows indicate positive cells for the corresponding hormones in the mutant and wild-type pituitaries. Only a few positive cells for GH, TSHβ, and αGSU are present in the pituitaries of Wnt4−/− mutant animals. Five pairs of embryos were analyzed.

Attenuation of the BMP2 signal is required for terminal differentiation

Terminal differentiation of Pit-1 cell types occurs only by E15.5–16.5 (Simmons et al. 1990; Japon et al. 1994), by which time BMP2 expression is no longer detected. We therefore wished to investigate whether the suppression of BMP2 activity was required for terminal differentiation of pituitary cell phenotypes. To address this question, BMP2/4 was misexpressed under the αGSU cis-regulatory elements in transgenic mice; immunohistochemical analysis on E17.0, well after the appearance of terminal differentiation markers, revealed that αGSU, TSHβ, growth hormone, and prolactin were not present (Fig. 5b–e, l–o), whereas ACTH was unaffected (Fig. 5a,k). These data suggest that the physiological attenuation of BMP2 expression is a critical component of terminal differentiation, as sustained expression of BMP activity results in a block of terminal differentiation of these four cell types. As the gland was not hypoplastic, and even hypercellular, we asked whether lineage determination had occurred. Marker gene expression was assessed by in situ hybridization. Transcripts for Pit-1, Isl-1, and GATA-2 were present, showing that lineage determination had indeed occurred (Fig. 5g–i, q–s). Expression of GATA-2 and Isl-1 has been noted in permanent gonadotrope and thyrotrope cell lines (Steger et al. 1994), and we found that GATA-2 shows a ventrally restricted expression pattern, similar to that of Isl-1 (J.S. Dasen, S.M. O’Connell, and M.G. Rosenfeld, unpubl.). Interestingly, the GATA-2/Isl-1-positive cell population is strongly expanded, with GATA-2, but not Isl-1, being highly transcriptionally induced. Thus the ventral cell types appear to respond directly to the BMP signal pathway by upregulation of GATA-2. At the same time Msx-1, one of the relatively few established target genes of the BMP2/4 pathway (Vainio et al. 1993), exhibited a marked up regulation throughout the gland, whereas in a wild-type gland Msx-1 was detectable at E17.0 only in the perilumenal cells (Fig. 5j,t). Because it has been shown that Msx-1 can function as a transcriptional repressor in other systems, such as in muscle differentiation (Woloshin et al. 1995) it is tempting to speculate that sustained expression of Msx-1 may, at least in part, account for the observed phenotype.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

 Prolonged BMP activity inhibits terminal differentiation. Phenotypic appearance of the pituitary gland in αGSU–BMP4 transgenic embryos at E17.0. Pituitaries of an E17 transgenic embryo (k–t) and its wild-type littermate (a–j) are shown. Immunohistochemical analysis for the trophic hormones ACTH (a,k), αGSU (b,l), TSHβ (c,m), GH (d,n), and PRL (e,o) are shown. Arrows indicate positive cells for the corresponding hormones in the wild-type mouse. In situ analysis was performed with the following markers: αGSU (f,p), Isl-1 (g,q), GATA-2 (h,r), Pit-1 (i,s), and Msx-1 (j,t). Four independent transgenic embryos from this stage of gestation were analyzed, all showing an abnormal phenotype.

FGF8 prevents ventral-cell-type determination

The recent observation that signaling through the receptor tyrosine kinase/MAP kinase (Erk1/2) pathway leads to the dominant inhibition of BMP activity (Kretschmar et al. 1997) is highly suggestive of the possibility that FGF8 expressed in the ventral diencephalon/infundibulum counteracts the ventral BMP signal. To test a model proposing that FGF8 and BMP2 represent counteracting activity gradients in the developing gland, we misexpressed FGF8 under the αGSU cis-regulatory elements in early Rathke’s pouch. The pituitary gland of such transgenic animals exhibited a dramatic phenotype, with severe dysmorphogenesis and enlargement. Immunohistochemical analysis for the trophic hormones MSH, ACTH, GH, TSHβ, αGSU, and LHβ (Fig. 6; data not shown) revealed that in the more severe phenotypes (Fig. 6f–j), cell lineages including gonadotropes, thyrotropes, somatotropes, and lactotropes were missing (Fig. 6h–j), whereas there was a greatly expanded population of MSH- and ACTH-expressing cells detected (Fig. 6f,g). Furthermore, expression of Pit-1, Isl-1, and GATA-2 was not detected (data not shown), indicating that determination of the Pit-1 and gonadotrope lineage had failed to occur. These data are consistent with the idea that FGF8 is critical for determination of the dorsal cell phenotypes, which have proved to be corticotropes (producing ACTH) and melanotropes (producing MSH), with higher levels of FGF8 activity actually suppressing all ventral cell types.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

 FGF8 promotes proliferation and opposes BMP activity in the pituitary gland. Phenotypic appearance of the pituitary gland in αGSU–FGF8 transgenic embryos at E17.5. Two transgenic embryos are shown, because the phenotype became more severe with higher copy number of the transgene [αGSU–FGF8 (f–j) strong phenotype, αGSU–FGF8 (k–o) weaker phenotype]. In both cases the gland exhibited striking dysmorphogenesis and increased cellularity (all photomicrographs taken at the same magnification). In αGSU–FGF8 (f,g), new clusters of lumenal-like cells have budded off (open arrows). Immunohistochemical analysis for the trophic hormones MSH (a,f,k), ACTH (b,g,l), GH (c,h,m), TSHβ (d,i,n), and αGSU (e,j,o) are shown, with selective loss of GH (h), TSHβ (i), and αGSU (j) in the case of the more severe phenotype and TSHβ (n) and αGSU (o) in the case of the weaker phenotype. The arrows mark clusters of positive cells for the respective hormones analyzed. Note that the dark dots, especially seen in the α–αGSU analysis of the αGSU–FGF8 (o) transgene, represent blood cells and not positive staining. Seven independent transgenic embryos at this stage were analyzed, with three showing the more severe abnormal phenotype then the other four.

According to a gradient model, gonadotropes and thyrotropes should be most sensitive to FGF8 signaling as they are determined in the region most ventral to the source of FGF8 expression. Consistent with this model, transgenic embryos with a lower copy number of the FGF8 transgene exhibited a less severe phenotype (Fig. 6k–o), with the appearance of some growth hormone positive somatotropes (Fig. 6m), which arise dorsally to the thyrotrope or gonadotrope cell populations, yet still excluding thyrotropes and gonadotropes entirely (Fig. 6n,o). These data therefore suggest counteracting BMP2/FGF8 activity gradients in determination of specific pituitary cell phenotypes.

Dorsoventral gradients of transcription factor expression in the developing pituitary gland

Based on these data we predicted that one should be able to find transcription factors with spatially and temporally restricted expression patterns that would reflect these two opposing activity gradients. In contrast to factors such as P-OTX/Ptx1 that exhibit uniform expression (Fig. 7B), Brn-4 (Mathis et al. 1992), a POU homeodomain transcription factor, appears ventrally at E10–10.5 and ultimately becomes expressed throughout the ventral half of the maturing nascent gland (Fig. 7B). We isolated several new genes exhibiting restricted expression patterns in Rathke’s pouch using RT–PCR. One is a novel member of the Winged-helix (Forkhead) transcription factor family, that we refer to as P-Frk (for pituitary forkhead factor; Fig. 7A). As shown in Figure 7B, expression of P-Frk was initiated at the most ventral part of Rathke’s pouch, coincident with the appearance of the ventral Shh/BMP2 boundary and remained restricted at later times to the most ventrorostral part of the gland, further subdividing the Brn-4 expression domain. In contrast to P-Frk, the LIM–homeodomain factor Isl-1 (Thor et al. 1991) appeared to be more widely expressed initially and subsequently became ventrally restricted, exhibiting a temporally and spatially overlapping expression with P-Frk during pituitary organogenesis. Six-3 (Oliver et al. 1995) and Prop-1 (Sornson et al. 1996) are initially expressed in a complementary dorsoventral gradient, extending to partially overlap the Brn-4 expression domain (Fig. 7B; data not shown).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

 Patterning of Rathke’s pouch by spatially restricted expression of transcription factors. (A) Comparison of the amino acid sequence of the new Winged-helix transcription factor P-Frk to that of other related Winged-helix (Forkhead) factors. (B) In situ hybridization analysis for P-OTX, Isl-1, P-Frk, Brn-4, Nkx-3.1, Six-3, and Msx-1 during early stages of pituitary development. Notice that P-Frk expression was detected at E10.5 in the most ventral part of Rathke’s pouch (arrowheads). Brackets mark the position of the pituitary and the different dorsal-to-ventral expression of each transcription factor, respectively. (e) Embryonic day of mouse development; (A) anterior lobe; (I) intermediate lobe; (RP) Rathke’s pouch; (P) pituitary; (VD) ventral diencephalon.

On the most dorsal aspect of the developing gland, directly opposite to the highest levels of FGF8 expression, a Nkx-related homeobox gene, Nkx-3.1 (Bieberich et al. 1996), was found to be the most dorsally restricted known transcription factor expressed in Rathke’s pouch and further subdivides the Prop-1/Six-3-positive field. The expression of genes encoding these distinct classes of transcription factors in overlapping dorsoventral quadrants indicates a division of the nascent Rathke’s pouch into regions with distinct complements of transcription factors, suggesting that cell lineage determination may well have already occurred by this stage of pituitary organogenesis, consequent to the proposed BMP2/FGF8 gradients.

Discussion

We have obtained evidence for three phases of signaling control in generating the hormone-producing pituitary cell types, providing a model for the generation of specific cell phenotypes from a common primordium in mammalian organogenesis. Our data support a model of pituitary development (Fig. 8) in which dorsal neuroepithelial signals, particularly BMP4, are critical for initial pituitary organ commitment. The subsequent establishment of a ventral boundary at Shh-expressing and -nonexpressing ectodermal domains within the oral ectoderm appears to function as an organizing center, resulting in induction of BMP2 in Rathke’s pouch. Later, the action of FGF8 dorsally and of BMP2 ventrally, may dictate the observed restricted dorsal or ventral expression patterns of specific transcription factors in the nascent Rathke’s pouch that are proposed to determine specific pituitary cell lineages. Thus, the pituitary gland provides a case in which related BMP factors serve sequential roles, first dorsally and then ventrally, to successively determine organ and distinct cell types within the pituitary gland. Finally, attenuation of specific signals is required for terminal differentiation of distinct cell phenotypes. These data lead to the conclusion that each of the mature cell types are determined relatively early during organogenesis, at the Rathke’s pouch stage, in a strict ventral-to-dorsal fashion, with gonadotropes, thyrotropes, somatotropes/lactotropes, corticotropes, and melanotropes representing the progressively more dorsally determined cell types (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

 Model of cell lineage determination in pituitary ontogeny. At E8.5 (e8.5) in mouse development, Shh and P-OTX are continuously expressed throughout the oral ectoderm. Signals from the ventral diencephalon, most prominently BMP4, suppress the expression of Shh, creating a Shh-nonexpressing zone, the primordium of the nascent Rathke’s pouch and at the same time induce P-Lim/Lhx3. The boundary between the oral ectoderm expressing Shh and the nonexpressing Rathke’s pouch function as an organizing center for ventral gene induction, including BMP2. At E10.5 Rathke’s pouch has formed and the infundibulum is visible. FGF8, expressed in the infundibulum, functions antagonistically to BMP2, resulting in ventrodorsal BMP and dorsoventral FGF activity gradients in Rathke’s pouch. This leads to the induction of several temporally and spatially restricted transcription factors, postulated to combinatorially divide Rathke’s pouch into zones with different identities. These zones are proposed to impose the determination of cell lineages at this developmental stage. During the next 2 days of cell lineage expansion, the BMP2 activity gradient in Rathke’s pouch is reinforced by ventral expression of BMP2 in the underlying condensing mesenchyme and counteracted by dorsal expression of FGF8 and caudal expression of chordin.

Initial phase of pituitary development: dorsal neuroepithelial signals in pituitary organ commitment

The mammalian pituitary gland represents an example in which initiation of organ development depends on contact between two distinct ectodermal cell layers, whereby the ventral diencephalon produces the inducing factor(s) and the oral ectoderm provides the competence required to respond to this signal(s) (Kimura et al. 1996), similar to established classical embryological experiments (Spemann 1938). BMP4, FGF8, and Wnt5a represent the only known members of these three families of regulatory molecules that are expressed in the region of the ventral diencephalon that directly contacts the invaginating oral ectoderm destined to become the pituitary gland. These factors appear to be expressed in overlapping, but distinct fashion, with BMP4 exhibiting the most restricted expression, in contrast to the more extended expression of Wnt5a in the ventral diencephalon.

The ability to appropriately target noggin misexpression by the use of specific regulatory sequences of the P-OTX/Ptx-1 gene has permitted the initial proof in vivo of a required role for BMP activity in pituitary organ commitment. Noggin can interact with BMP4 and BMP2 and to lesser extent with BMP7 (Zimmerman et al. 1996), but neither BMP2 or BMP7 appear to be expressed in the ventral diencephalon, suggesting that BMP4 is the signaling molecule required for initial determination of the pituitary gland. As the initial invagination of oral ectoderm is not lost in the noggin transgenic mice, the phenotype of these mice is virtually identical to that of the Lhx3/P-Lim(−/−) mice (Sheng et al. 1996). In both cases, only a few ACTH-positive cells are present among the ectodermal cells. Therefore, it is likely that BMP4 is either directly or indirectly responsible for Lhx3/P-Lim induction or represents a parallel requirement for the same step of organ commitment. Our experiments further show that FGF8 is a potent mitogen within Rathke’s pouch, leading to hyperproliferation when ectopically expressed. Therefore, FGF8, as in other systems (Crossley et al. 1996; Lee et al. 1997; Neubuser et al. 1997), is required at least for the growth of Rathke’s pouch. Together these studies have provided the initial in vivo proof that at least one of the signaling molecules expressed in the ventral diencephalon, BMP4, is required for pituitary organ commitment.

Second phase of pituitary development: counteracting dorsoventral FGF8/BMP2 gradients

The onset of pituitary organogenesis is also marked by a striking restriction of Shh, uniformly expressed in oral ectoderm, from the invaginating Rathke’s pouch, resulting in a molecular boundary in the oral ectoderm. The second phase of pituitary development appears to involve a ventral-to-dorsal gradient of BMP2 expression, beginning at the boundary of Shh expression. Based on the effects of the expression of a specific dominant-negative receptor, the role of BMP2 appears to be determination of all the ventral cell phenotypes, including specification of the Pit-1 lineage. We suggest that determination of the most ventral cell lineage specifying the gonadotropes is also dependent on BMP2, although the dominant-negative receptor inefficiently blocked the higher ventral BMP2 activity. Indeed, overexpression of BMP2/4 expands this ventral lineage marked by increased expression of GATA-2. In contrast, melanotropes producing MSH, and corticotropes producing ACTH were not affected, consistent with a model that they represent the dorsal cell types.

In addition to the ability of FGF8 to increase proliferation of the nascent pituitary gland, it also exerts a central role in dorsal cell type determination. Overexpression of FGF8 markedly increases the melanotrope and corticotrope populations, and abolishes appearance of the ventral gonadotrope, thyrotrope, somatotrope, and lactotrope cell types. Consistent with the model of a dorsal-to-ventral FGF gradient, at lower levels of FGF8 we now observed appearance of a somatotrope population. Therefore, FGF8 appears to exert several roles in proliferation and subsequently in cell type determination, similar to its role in limb development and patterning at the midbrain/hindbrain boundary (Crossley et al. 1996; Lee et al. 1997). In concert with previous anatomical evidence (Japon et al. 1994; Simmons et al. 1990), we suggest that early in Rathke’s pouch development, the six hormone-producing cell types are determined in a ventral-to-dorsal gradient, generating gonadotropes, thyrotropes, somatotropes, lactotropes, corticotropes, and melanotropes, respectively.

We have identified a series of transcription factors that are expressed in overlapping dorsal-to-ventral or ventral to dorsal gradients, consistent with overlapping patterns of factors that could combinatorally determine specific cell types. Among the factors identified is a member of the Nkx family, Nkx-3.1 (Bieberich et al. 1996), which is the most dorsally expressed transcription factor thus far identified. Expression of several genes encoding transcription factors, including Six-3, extend more ventrally. Conversely, a series of ventrally expressed factors exhibit progressively more dorsal extension in their field of expression. A novel forkhead factor, P-Frk, has proved to be the most ventrally expressed factor, whereas GATA-2, Isl-1, and Brn-4 exhibit progressively more dorsal expression, overlapping with Six-3 and Prop-1 (Fig. 8). It is noteworthy that the closest related forkhead member to P-Frk, TTF-2 is also expressed in the pituitary gland and is involved in thyroid gland cell-type determination (Zannini et al. 1997). Consistent with the hypothesis that expression of these factors are generated by gradients of signaling molecules, we have found that perturbation of the BMP2/FGF8 gradients in vivo alters boundaries of expression of these factors. For example, overexpression of BMP2/4 extended the boundaries of Isl-1 and GATA-2 expression dorsally, linking the patterns of induced transcription factors to generation of specific cell types.

Therefore, the sequential roles of BMP4 expressed in the ventral diencephalon and BMP2 expressed within the pituitary gland are conceptually analogous to the proposed cascade of TGFβ inductive signals leading to neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord (Liem et al. 1997) and the demonstration that Dpp can serve as a long-range signal (Nellen et al. 1996), exhibiting concentration-dependent effects on cell type specification (Lecuit et al. 1996).

The initial appearance of BMP2 immediately adjacent to the Shh boundary raises intriguing questions concerning the role, if any, of Shh in pituitary development. Targeting Shh under the αGSU 5′-flanking sequence resulted in an enlargement of the embryonic rostral tip and an expansion of αGSU-positive, Isl-1-positive cell types, (M. Treier, A. Gleiberman, and M.G. Rosenfeld, unpubl.), suggesting that Shh here serves to expand ventral gonadotrope populations, consistent with the role of Shh in expansion of specific cell types in other organs (Bellusci et al. 1997). In addition to the role of BMP2, at least one Wnt (Wnt4), expressed within the developing gland as well as throughout the oral ectoderm appears to exert roles during pituitary development. The pituitary glands of Wnt4−/− mice were hypocellular, but all cell types were correctly determined, suggesting that Wnt factors may exert roles in progenitor cell expansion in the pituitary gland similar to their roles in neural crest and CNS development (Ikeya et al. 1997). Thus members of the BMP, FGF, and Wnt families and possibly Shh, all participate in the progression from organ commitment to cell-type determination that occurs between E10 and E12, with the dorsal FGF and ventral BMP2 gradients being critical determinants of the hormone-producing pituitary cell types.

Third phase of pituitary development: cell-type differentiation requires attenuation of BMP signaling

We have provided evidence that attenuation of specific signaling molecules is itself a critical component of the terminal differentiation events in the pituitary gland, because continued expression of BMP2/4 results in a failure of terminal differentiation of all ventral cell types including gonadotropes, thyrotropes, somatotropes, and lactotropes, but not their determination, as marked by expression of Isl-1, GATA-2, and Pit-1. The importance of attenuation of BMP2 expression for progression to definitive cell types, indicates that negative control of BMP2 expression itself, is required to permit terminal differentiation. Because Msx-1 is a well described target gene for BMP2/4, it as well as other potential target genes may mediate the block of differentiation; similar to roles suggested for Msx-1 in muscle and tooth development (Vainio et al. 1993; Woloshin et al. 1995). It is interesting to note that overexpression of BMP2/4 in the pituitary gland does not result in inhibition of cell proliferation or the induction of apoptosis as reported in other systems (Bellusci et al. 1996).

The paradigm of pituitary development, characterized by serial determination events, thus extends our understanding of the sequential roles of signaling gradients in the generation of specific cell phenotypes during mammalian organogenesis.

Materials and methods

Generation and identification of transgenic mice

Transgenic mice were produced as described (Crenshaw et al. 1989). Constructs were generated by inserting the respective cDNAs between a rabbit 0.65-kb β-globin intron fragment at the 5′-end and a 0.63-kb poly(A) fragment of the human growth hormone gene at the 3′-end. Finally either a 14-kb fragment containing the mouse αGSU promoter or a 8-kb fragment containing the mouse P-OTX promoter was inserted 5′ of this cassette, respectively. The P-OTX transgene was flanked on the 5′ and 3′ site with 2× the chicken β-globin insulator fragment (gift of G. Felsenfeld, NIH, Bethesda, MD). Mouse DNA was analyzed for integration of the transgene by PCR analysis using two specific primers for each transgene, respectively. The following cDNAs were used, mouse ΔBMPR cDNA as described (Suzuki et al. 1994, gift of N. Ueto), the 5′ out-of-frame ATGs were removed in the full-length mouse BMP4 cDNA (gift of B. Hogan, HHMI, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) by mutagenesis, a EcoRI–HindIII DNA fragment encoding full-length Xenopus noggin (gift of R. Harland, University of California, Berkeley). The αGSU–FGF8 transgene contains the cDNA for FGF8b corresponding to isoform (1) in Crossley and Martin (1995) (gift of C.A. MacArthur, Washington University, St. Louis, MO).

The number of transgenics obtained at the reported stage and the number showing an abnormal phenotype (respectively in parentheses): POTX–Noggin, E17.5 (4;3); αGSU–DBMPR, 2 months (7;3); αGSU–BMP4, E17.5 (4;4); αGSU–FGF8, E17.5 (7;7). The generation of the Wnt4 (−/−) mutant animals and genotyping are described in Stark et al. (1994).

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

Isolation, fixation, and hybridization with 35S-labeled antisense RNA probes and exposure were all done as previously described (Simmons et al. 1990). Immunohistochemistry was done on 5–7-mm thick paraffin sections stained by indirect immunoperoxidase method. Peroxidase activity was visualized with DAB/metal enhancer (Pierce, Rockford, Il). Sections were counterstained with methyl green and mounted in Permount (Fisher). Antibodies are obtained and used diluted as follow: ACTH (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) 1:1000; GH, PRL, TSHβ (all from DAKO, Carpinteria, CA); αGSU (National Hormone and Pituitary Program) 1:1000; Pit-1 rabbit antiserum, 1:100. Anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies were from Chemicon and used in a 1:500 dilution.

Isolation and cultivation of Rathke’s pouch

Mice used were F1(C57B/6J × CBA). Embryos were obtained from dated pregnancies. The day of the vaginal plug was considered E0.5. Somite number was used in addition to determine developmental stages for early embryos. Rathke’s pouch and ventral diencephalon were dissected from E9.5 and E10.5 mouse embryos after 10–20 min of treatment with collagenase (type I, Sigma) in DMEM (GIBCO) plus 10% FCS, using electrolytically sharpened tungsten needles. Rathke’s pouch and/or ventral diencephalon were placed on HAWP filters (Millipore), transferred on plastic floating rafts and cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS for 6–8 days for filter induction experiments; or Rathke’s pouch were cocultivated with COS cells that were transiently transfected with CMV-based expression vectors containing full-length BMP4 or Wnt5a cDNAs.

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to Y. Furuta for communicating data prior to publication, Aimee K. Ryan and Anna Krones for their contributions, and Peggy Myers for her expertise and generous assistance in preparation of illustrations, as well as the transgenic core facility at the Scripps Research Institute. For generously providing reagents and plasmids, we thank E. DeRobertis, G. Felsenfeld, P. Gruss, R. Harland, B. Hogan, C.A. MacArthur, G. Martin, N. Ueto, and S. Werner. We also thank the National Hormone and Pituitary Program, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK; Rockville, MD). M.T. was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds postdoctoral fellowship; A.S.G. by a National Research Service Award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). M.G.R is an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This work was supported by a grant from NIH (NIDDK).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note

The GenBank accession no. for the sequence described in this paper is AF060873.

Footnotes

E-MAIL mrosenfeld@ucsd.edu; FAX (619) 534-8180.

References

  1. Bach I, Rhodes SJ, Pearse RV, Heinzel T, Gloss B, Scully KM, Sawchenko PE, Rosenfeld MG. P-Lim, a LIM homeodomain factor, is expressed during pituitary organ and cell commitment and synergizes with Pit-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92:2720–2724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basler K, Struhl G. Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature. 1994;368:208–214. doi: 10.1038/368208a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellusci S, Henderson R, Winnier G, Oikawa T, Hogan BL. Evidence from normal expression and targeted misexpression that bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp-4) plays a role in mouse embryonic lung morphogenesis. Development. 1996;122:1693–1702. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.6.1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellusci S, Furuta Y, Rush MG, Henderson R, Winnier G, Hogan BL. Involvement of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in mouse embryonic lung growth and morphogenesis. Development. 1997;124:53–63. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bieberich C, Fujita K, He W, Jay G. Prostate-specific and androgen-dependent expression of a novel homeobox gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31779–31782. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.50.31779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bumcrot DA, McMahon AP. Somite differentiation. Sonic signals somites. Curr Biol. 1995;6:612–614. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cadigan KM, Nusse R. Wnt signaling: A common theme in animal development. Genes & Dev. 1997;11:3286–3305. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Couly, G. and N.M. LeDouarin. 1988. The fate map of the cephalic neural primordium at the presomitic to the 3-somite stage in the avian embryo. Development (Suppl.) 103: 101–113. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Crenshaw EBI, Kalla K, Simmons DM, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG. Cell-specific expression of the prolactin gene in transgenic mice is controlled by synergistic interactions between promoter and enhancer elements. Genes & Dev. 1989;3:959–972. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Crossley PH, Martin GR. The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development. 1995;121:439–451. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.2.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crossley P, Minowada G, MacArthur C, Martin G. Roles for FGF8 in the induction, initiation, and maintenance of chick limb development. Cell. 1996;84:127–136. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80999-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eagleson GW, Harris WA. Mapping of the presumptive brain regions in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis. J Neurobiol. 1990;21:427–440. doi: 10.1002/neu.480210305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gage PJ, Roller ML, Saunders TL, Scarlett LM, Camper SA. Anterior pituitary cells defective in the cell-autonomous factor, df, undergo cell lineage specification but not expansion. Development. 1996;122:151–160. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hermesz E, Mackem S, Mahon KA. Rpx: A novel anterior-restricted homeobox gene progressively activated in the prechordal plate, anterior neural plate and Rathke’s pouch of the mouse embryo. Development. 1996;122:41–52. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hogan B. Bone morphogenetic proteins: Multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes & Dev. 1996;10:1580–1594. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.13.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ikeya M, Lee SM, Johnson JE, McMahon AP, Takada S. Wnt signalling required for expansion of neural crest and CNS progenitors. Nature. 1997;389:966–970. doi: 10.1038/40146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacobson AG, Miyamoto DM, Mai S-H. Rathke’s pouch morphogenesis in the chick embryo. J Exp Zool. 1979;207:351–366. [Google Scholar]
  18. Japon MA, Rubinstein M, Low MJ. In situ hybridization analysis of anterior pituitary hormone gene expression during fetal mouse development. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994;42:1117–1125. doi: 10.1177/42.8.8027530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson RL, Tabin CJ. Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell. 1997;90:979–990. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80364-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones CM, Lyons KM, Hogan BLM. Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. Development. 1991;111:531–542. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.2.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kendall SK, Gordon DF, Birkmeier TS, Petrey D, Sarapura VD, O’Shea KS, Wood WM, Lloyd RV, Ridgway EC, Camper SA. Enhancer-mediated high level expression of mouse pituitary glycoprotein hormone α-subunit transgene in thyrotropes, gonadotropes, and developing pituitary gland. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8:1420–1433. doi: 10.1210/mend.8.10.7531821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimura S, Hara Y, Pineau T, Fernandez-Salguero P, Fox CH, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ. The T/ebp null mouse: Thyroid-specific enhancer-binding protein is essential for the organogenesis of the thyroid, lung, ventral forebrain, and pituitary. Genes & Dev. 1996;10:60–69. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kretschmar M, Doody J, Massagué J. Opposing BMP and EGF signalling pathways converge on the TGF-beta family mediator Smad1. Nature. 1997;389:618–622. doi: 10.1038/39348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lamonerie T, Tremblay JJ, Lanctot C, Therrien M, Gauthier Y, Drouin J. Ptx-1, a bicoid-related homeo box transcription factor involved in transcription of the pro-opiomelanocortin gene. Genes & Dev. 1996;10:1284–1295. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.10.1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanctot C, Lamolet B, Drouin J. The bicoid-related homeoprotein Ptx1 defines the most anterior domain of the embryo and differentiates posterior from anterior lateral mesoderm. Development. 1997;124:2807–2817. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.14.2807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lawrence P, Struhl G. Morphogens, compartments, and pattern: Lessons from Drosophila? Cell. 1996;85:951–961. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81297-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lecuit T, Brook WJ, Ng M, Calleja M, Sun H, Cohen SM. Two distinct mechanisms for long range patterning by Decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Nature. 1996;381:387–393. doi: 10.1038/381387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee S, Danielian P, Fritzsch B, McMahon AP. Evidence that FGF8 signalling from the midbrain-hindbrain junction regulates growth and polarity in the developing midbrain. Development. 1997;124:959–969. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.5.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li S, Crenshaw EB, Rawson EJ, Simmons DM, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG. Dwarf locus mutants lacking three pituitary cell types result from mutations in the POU-domain gene pit-1. Nature. 1990;347:528–533. doi: 10.1038/347528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liem K, Tremml G, Jessell T. A role for the roof plate and its resident TGF-beta-related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord. Cell. 1997;91:127–138. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL. A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell. 1994;77:481–490. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90211-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Massagué J. TGFβ signaling: Receptors, transducers, and Mad proteins. Cell. 1996;85:947–950. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81296-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mathis JM, Simmons DM, He X, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG. Brain 4: A novel mammalian POU domain transcription factor exhibiting restricted brain-specific expression. EMBO J. 1992;11:2551–2561. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05320.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nellen D, Burke R, Basler K, Struhl G. Direct and graded long-range signaling by Dpp. Cell. 1996;85:357–368. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81114-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neubuser A, Peters H, Balling R, Martin G. Antagonistic interactions between FGF and BMP signaling pathways: A mechanism for positioning the sites of tooth formation. Cell. 1997;90:247–255. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80333-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Oliver G, Mailhos A, Wehr R, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Gruss P. Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development. Development. 1995;121:4045–4055. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.12.4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Piccolo S, Sasai Y, Lu B, De Robertis E. Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: Inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell. 1996;86:589–598. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80132-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rusch J, Levine M. Threshold responses to the dorsal regulatory gradient and the subdivision of primary tissue territories in the Drosophila embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:416–423. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80062-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheng HZ, Zhadanov AB, Mosinger Jr B, Fujii T, Bertuzzi S, Grinberg A, Lee EJ, Huang S-P, Mahon KA, Westphal H. Specification of pituitary cell lineages by the LIM homeobox gene Lhx3. Science. 1996;272:1004–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5264.1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheng HZ, Moriyama K, Yamashita T, Li H, Potter SS, Mahon KA, Westphal H. Multistep control of pituitary organogenesis. Science. 1997;278:1809–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5344.1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Simmons DM, Voss JW, Ingraham HA, Holloway JM, Broide RS, Rosenfeld MG, Swanson LW. Pituitary cell phenotypes involve cell-specific Pit-1 mRNA translation and synergistic interactions with other classes of transcription factors. Genes & Dev. 1990;4:695–711. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.5.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sornson M, Wu W, Dasen J, Flynn S, Norman D, O’Connell S, Gukovsky I, Carriere C, Ryan A, Miller A, Zuo L, Gleiberman A, Andersen B, Beamer W, Rosenfeld M. Pituitary lineage determination by the Prophet of Pit-1 homeodomain factor defective in Ames dwarfism. Nature. 1996;384:327–333. doi: 10.1038/384327a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Spemann H. Embryonic development and induction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1938. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stark K, Vainio S, Vassileva G, McMahon AP. Epithelial transformation of metanephric mesenchyme in the developing kidney regulated by Wnt4. Nature. 1994;372:679–683. doi: 10.1038/372679a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Steger DJ, Hecht JH, Mellon PL. GATA-binding proteins regulate the human gonadotropin alpha-subunit gene in the placenta and pituitary gland. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:5592–5602. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.8.5592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Suzuki A, Thies R, Yamaji N, Song J, Wozney J, Murakami K, Ueno N. A truncated bone morhogenetic protein receptor affects dorsal-ventral patterning in the early Xenopus embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91:10255–10259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Szeto DP, Ryan AK, O’Connell SM, Rosenfeld MG. P-OTX: A Pit-1 interacting homeodomain factor expressed during anterior pituitary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:7706–7710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tabin C. The initiation of the limb bud: Growth factors, Hox genes, and retinoids. Cell. 1995;80:671–674. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tanabe Y, Jessell TM. Diversity and pattern in the developing spinal cord. Science. 1996;274:1115–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Theslaff I, Sharpe P. Signalling networks regulating dental development. Mech Dev. 1997;67:111–123. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomas PQ, Johnson BV, Rathjen J, Rathjen PD. Sequence, genomic organization, and expression of the novel homeobox gene Hesx1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:3869–3875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Thor S, Ericson J, Brännström T, Edlund T. The homeodomain LIM protein Isl-1 is expressed in subsets of neurons and endocrine cells in the adult rat. Neuron. 1991;7:881–889. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90334-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Treier M, Rosenfeld M. The hypothalamic-pituitary axis: Co-development of two organs. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:833–843. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80085-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vainio S, Karavanova I, Jowett A, Thesleff I. Identification of BMP-4 as a signal mediating secondary induction between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues during early tooth development. Cell. 1993;75:45–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Voss JW, Rosenfeld MG. Anterior pituitary development: Short tales from dwarf mice. Cell. 1992;70:527–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90422-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Walther C, Gruss P. Pax-6, amurine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development. 1991;113:1435–1449. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Winnier G, Blessing M, Labosky PA, Hogan BL. Bone morphogenetic protein-4 is required for mesoderm formation and patterning in the mouse. Genes & Dev. 1995;9:2105–2116. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.17.2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Woloshin P, Song K, Degnin C, Killary A, Goldhammer D, Sassoon D, Thayer M. MSX1 inhibits myoD expression in fibroblast 10T1/2 hybrids. Cell. 1995;82:611–620. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zannini M, Avantaggiato V, Biffali E, Arnone MI, Sato K, Pischetola M, Taylor BA, Phillips SJ, Simeone A, Di Lauro R. TTF-2, a new forkhead protein, shows a temporal expression in the developing thyroid which is consistent with a role in controlling the onset of differentiation. EMBO J. 1997;16:3185–3197. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhadanov AB, Bertuzzi S, Taira M, Dawid IB, Westphal H. Expression pattern of the murine LIM class homeobox gene Lhx3 in subsets of neural and neuroendocrine tissues. Dev Dyn. 1995;202:354–364. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002020405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang H, Bradley A. Mice deficient for BMP2 are nonviable and have defects in amnion/chorion and cardiac development. Development. 1996;122:2977–2986. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zimmerman L, De Jesus-Escobar J, Harland R. The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4. Cell. 1996;86:599–606. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80133-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Development are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES