Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 Jun 8;54(13):4339–4349. doi: 10.1021/jm101440r

Novel flavonoids with anti-proliferative activities against breast cancer cells

Nianhuan Yao 1,#, Chao-Yu Chen 1,#, Chun-Yi Wu 1, Kiyomi Motonishi 1, Hsing-Jien Kung 1,3, Kit S Lam 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC3169196  NIHMSID: NIHMS302618  PMID: 21599001

Abstract

A series of flavone analogues were synthesized and evaluated for their anti-proliferation activity against breast cancer cells. The IC50 of compound 10 and 24 were determined to be at 5μM. These compounds were used as baits to screen breast cancer cDNA expression phage display proteome library. DNA sequencing of the binding phages suggests that eEF1A1 is a target protein for 10 and 24. Further optimization of these compounds led to the discovery of 39 with higher cytotoxic potency (IC50 = 1μM) and binding to eEF1A2. Biological and biochemical data suggest that eEF1A2 might be a therapeutic target and that 39 is an excellent lead compound for further development.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the second most lethal cancer among women.1 Women have a 1 in 8 lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and 1 in 35 risk of breast cancer causing death in the US. Many breast tumors express higher levels of estrogen receptors than normal breast tissues.2 Estrogen receptor (ER)/ progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancers often respond to hormonal therapy. Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs are used for the treatment of ER/PR negative breast cancer. Herception is useful for the treatment of Her-2/neu positive breast cancer. Despite of combination hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy,3, 4 most metastatic breast cancer eventually becomes refractory to such treatments. There is an urgent need to explore new drug candidates with novel mechanisms of action.

Many current anti-cancer drugs are either natural products or their derivatives.5, 6 Nature products have also served as useful scaffolds for chemical diversification in the context of drug discovery.7 Flavonoids are the most explored class of nature products because they are widely distributed among various plants and common components of the human diet.8 They probably play an important role in cancer prevention by interfering with cell proliferation, survival, cell signaling, and regulating the immune system.9-11 Additional studies have also indicated that some flavonoids exhibit aromatase inhibitory activity12, 13 and tyrosinase inhibitory activity.14 We have previously developed several novel flavonoid scaffolds with three diversification points.15 Here, based on the flavone template, a series of flavonoid derivatives were synthesized on solid phase and evaluated for their antiproliferative activities in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7. Two compounds were found to exhibit potent cytotoxic effect in both ER negative and ER positive breast cancer cell lines. The molecular targets of these lead compounds were identified by using them as bait to screen cDNA expression phage display proteome library. Further optimization of the lead compounds resulted in the development of a relatively potent antiproliferative compound that selectively bind to eukaryotic elongation factor 2A (eEF1A2).

Results and Discussion

A number of flavone scaffolds were developed with three functional groups (carboxy, fluoro, and nitro). Heterocycles or other pharmacophores can be readily introduced to the flavonone scaffolds. In our previous study, we reported the use of solid phase method to prepare several flavone derivatives (Figure 1. 1-6).15 As part of ongoing search for anti-cancer agents, we used MTT assay to evaluate their antiproliferactive activity in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231(ER-) and MCF-7(ER+). A compound was considered active if the IC50 was ≤10μM during the initially screening. Only 5 showed cytotoxicity activity in both breast cancer cell lines. (Figure 2)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Structure of flavone model compounds 1-6.

Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of flavone analogues 1-6.

Figure 2

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of flavone analogues 7-32

To optimize 5, we designed and synthesized 26 flavone analogues (7-32) according to our published method (Scheme 1).15 Various Fmoc amino acids, such as polar, acidic, and hydrophobic amino acids (R1 group in Table 1) were first introduced to Rink resin. After Fmoc deprotection, 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid as a functionalized flavone scaffold was attached to the resin. The fluorine in the resin-bound flavone scaffold was subsequently replaced by a number of structurally diverse primary amines, such as aliphatic and aromatic amines (R2 group in Table 1). Reduction of the nitro group then afforded the o-phenylenediamine intermediates. The resin bound o-phenylenediamine flavone was treated with different isothiocyanates (R3 group in Table 1) in the presence of 1, 3-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) to provide 7-17 and 18-20 (without introducing R1 group). To increase structural diversities, the resin bound o-phenylenediamine flavone was reacted with various aliphatic aldehydes and substituted aromatic aldehydes (R3 group in Table 1) to yield 21-28 and 29-32 (without introducing R1 group). Compounds 7-32 were tested for in vitro anticancer activity against two breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231(ER-) and MCF-7(ER+). Cells were treated with 10μM concentration of each analogue for three days. 10 and 24 were among the most active compounds (Figure 3). Further MTT assays were carried out to test 10 and 24 in varying concentration, ranging from 0.08μM to 50μM (Supporting information, Figure 1). Both 10 and 24 had high efficacy (IC50=5.0μM) in MDA-MB-231cells. Additionally, 10 (IC50=5.0μM) was higher than 24 (IC50=8.0μM) in MCF-7 cells.

Scheme 1a.

Scheme 1a

Scheme 1a

a Reagents and conditions: (a) Amino Acid (3 equiv), HOBt/DIC (3 equiv), DMF, r.t., 2 h; (b) 20% piperidine/DMF, 15 min, twice; (c) 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid (2 equiv), HOBt/DIC (3 equiv), DMF, r.t., 3 h; (d) 1M amine, 25% DIPEA/DMF, r.t., overnight; (e) 2M SnCl2/DMF, r.t., overnight; (f) 1M isothiocyanate, 1M DIC, DMF, r.t., overnight; (g) aldehyde (10 equiv), 5% HOAc/DMF, r.t. overnight; (h) TFA/ TIS/H2O (95%:2.5%:2.5%), r.t., 3 h. (i) 10% Acetic anhydride/10% pyridine/DMF, 30 min.

Table 1. Building blocks of Compounds 7-32.

Compounds R1 (Amino Acid) R2 (Amine) R3 (Isothiocyanate or Aldehyde)
7 H graphic file with name nihms302618t1.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t2.jpg
8 H graphic file with name nihms302618t3.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t4.jpg
9 graphic file with name nihms302618t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t6.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t7.jpg
10 graphic file with name nihms302618t8.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t9.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t10.jpg
11 graphic file with name nihms302618t8.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t6.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t11.jpg
12 graphic file with name nihms302618t12.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t13.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t14.jpg
13 graphic file with name nihms302618t12.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t15.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t16.jpg
14 graphic file with name nihms302618t17.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t18.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t19.jpg
15 graphic file with name nihms302618t17.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t20.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t21.jpg
16 graphic file with name nihms302618t22.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t24.jpg
17 graphic file with name nihms302618t22.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t25.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t26.jpg
18 graphic file with name nihms302618t27.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t28.jpg
19 graphic file with name nihms302618t29.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t30.jpg
20 graphic file with name nihms302618t31.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t32.jpg
21 graphic file with name nihms302618t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t33.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t34.jpg
22 graphic file with name nihms302618t12.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t35.jpg
23 graphic file with name nihms302618t12.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t15.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t36.jpg
24 graphic file with name nihms302618t37.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t38.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t39.jpg
25 H graphic file with name nihms302618t40.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t36.jpg
26 H graphic file with name nihms302618t41.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t42.jpg
27 graphic file with name nihms302618t22.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t43.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t39.jpg
28 graphic file with name nihms302618t22.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t44.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t45.jpg
29 graphic file with name nihms302618t46.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t47.jpg
30 graphic file with name nihms302618t48.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t49.jpg
31 graphic file with name nihms302618t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t50.jpg
32 graphic file with name nihms302618t33.jpg graphic file with name nihms302618t51.jpg

Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of flavone analogues 7-32.

Figure 3

Identification of eEF1A1 as a binding protein for compound 10 and 24

Phage display technology enables one to express and display recombinant peptides or proteins on the phage surface. Peptide and protein epitope for antibodies,16 EGFR,17, 18 and binding proteins for bioactive small molecules19-21 have been successfully identified by such technology. To identify the target proteins for 10 and 24, these chemical compounds were synthesized on TentaGel beads (polystyrene with grafted polyoxyethylene) (Supporting information Scheme 1) and used as bait to screen cDNA expression phage display proteome library constructed from human breast tumor cDNA. TentaGel resin was used because of its favorable swelling characteristics both in organic and aqueous media, its uniform size, and its non-stick property.22 After four rounds of biopanning, 12 phage clones from each compound were randomly selected, amplified and sequenced. The DNA sequence of the bound phage clones were analyzed via NCBI blast. In the panning experiment with 10, 4 out of 12 phage clones encoded DNA matched with known human proteins, two clones encoded eukaryotic elongation factor 1A1 (eEF1A1), one clone encoded apolipoprotein 3 (APOL3), and one encoded tropomysin 2 (TMP2) (sequence shown in supporting information). Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A 1 (eEF1A1) was also recovered in the panning experiment with 24. To verify eEF1A1 as the protein target for 10 and 24, biotinylated 10 and 24 were synthesized (Supporting information Scheme 2), and incubated with MDA-MB-231 cell lysate. Neutravidin beads were then used to pull down proteins bound to 10 and 24. Subsequent western blot analysis demonstrated that eEF1A did indeed bind to 10 and 24. (Figure 4)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Western blot analysis. Biotinylated 10, 24, and 39 were incubated with MDA-MB-231cell lysate and pulled down using neutravidin beads. Linker-Lys-biotin was used as negative control. The membrane was blotted with anti-eEF1A antibody.

Structure–Activity relationships (SAR) and Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Analysis

To discover more active flavone derivatives and to establish preliminary SAR, 10 and 24 were further optimized. Exchange of R1, R2, and R3 groups of 10 and 24, afforded 33-37 (Figure 5). Systematic structural simplification of 10 and 24 by removal of R1 and R3 group, reduction of the nitro group, and subsequently capping with acetyl group, yielded 38-44 (Figure 5). 33-44 were tested for antiproliferation against MDA-MB-231 cells(ER-) (Figure 5). In the case of modification of 10, replacement of Leu with Phe (33), (R)-(-)-1-Cyclohexylethylamine with benzylamine (34), and both Leu with Phe and (R)-(-)-1-Cyclohexylethylamine with benzylamine (35), resulted in a significant loss of anticancer activity. In contrast, optimization of 24 using the same strategy (36 and 37) showed the equal potency as parent compound 24. Compared to 10 (IC50=5μM), 39 in absence of an R3 group showed a 5-fold decrease in IC50. However, reduction of the nitro group to an amino group (40) and subsequently capping amino group with acetyl group (41) resulted in a marked increase in IC50, suggesting that the nitro group may be critical for MDA-MB-231 cell killing. Additionally, removal of the R3 group in 24 (41), reduction of the nitro group to an amino group (42) and capping the amino group with acetyl group (43), all resulted in a significant loss of anticancer activity. Consequently, 39, (simplified from 10) with deletion of the R3 group and possession of two chiral centers in Leu(R1) and (R)-(-)-1-Cyclohexylethylamine(R2), was found to have higher potency against MDA-MB-231 cells (IC50=1μM). Encouraged by this result, we further synthesized the optical isomers of 39 (45-47), and derivatives of 39 by replacing Leu with Phe (48) and D-Phe (49) (Figure 5). MTT assay was carried on 45-49 using MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 5). The result, however, indicated that further modifications of 39 led to a reduction in the antiproliferative activity.

Figure 5. Structure and cytotoxicity of 10 and 24 derivatives.

Figure 5

Figure 5

In comparison to 10 and 24, 39 lacked an imidazole ring. To explore whether eEF1A1 was also a binding protein to 39, the same pull down approach described above was performed on biotinylated 39. Interestingly, western blot analysis showed a slight difference between 39, 10 and 24, (Figure 4, supporting information, Figure 2) which may be due to the two isomers present in eukaryotic elongation factor (eEF1A1 and eEF1A2), sharing 92% amino acid identity.23 Therefore, we hypothesize that 39 may selectively bind to one of eukaryotic elongation factors. To test this assumption, we attempted to use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to evaluate their binding affinity between eukaryotic elongation factor and 10, 24, or 39. Biotionylated 10, 24 and 39 were immobilized on the streptavidin (SA) sensor chip via biotin. Different concentrations of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 were each infused over this sensor chip (supporting information, Figure 3). It is clear that both eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 did bind to these flavonoids. Unfortunately because of the lack of sufficient amount of target proteins to cover the entire concentration range, the apparent KDs obtained from the SPR studies were unreliable. Furthermore, 10, 24 and 39 were subjected to MTT assay with immortalized normal breast cells MCF10A. The result showed that 10 and 24 killed normal MCF10A cell in a similar manner as cancerous MCF-7 and MDA-MB-213 cells; whereas, 39 only killed about 65% of normal MCF10A cells at 50μM. The preferential anti-cancer effects of 39 could be explained by its selective binds to eEF1A2, which was overexpressed in breast tumor but not normal breast tissue. eEF1A2 might be the therapeutic target for the anticancer activity of 39.

Validation of selective binding of 39 to eEF1A2

eEF1A proteins are one of the key enzymes in protein synthesis which carries aminoacyl-tRNA into ribosome and catalyzes the first step of peptide elongation.24 Besides protein synthesis, eEF1A is also involved in several cell regulatory processes, including cytoskeletal remodeling, apoptosis, and ubiquitin mediated protein degradation.24 Recently, eEF1A2 (eukaryotic elongation factor 1A2), has been reported to be a putative oncoprotein.25 eEF1A2 has been shown to be overexpressed in 30-60% of ovarian, lung and breast cancers.25-28 Expression of eEF1A2 in fibroblast cells show tumorigenicity and increase the growth of xenograft in nude mice.25

To investigate the effect of 39 binding to eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, we first tested whether it could inhibit protein translation. 35S-methionine was used to monitor protein translation in cell culture. Cells treated with 39 showed decreased 35S-methionine incorporation into cellular proteins in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that 39 could indeed inhibit protein biosynthesis (Figure 6). Recently, Amiri A. et al reported that overexpression of eEF1A2 could lead to Akt activation in phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent manner, enhance filopodia formation and increase cell invasion, suggesting that eEF1A2 does play a critical role in tumor development and metastasis.29 To determine whether 39 could inhibit both eEF1A2 function and Akt activation, MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 39. Western blot analysis showed that 39 was able to suppress phosphorylation of serine 473 and threonine 308 in Akt (Figure 7a). Moreover, eEF1A2 is known to involve in actin remodeling and could increase cell migration.29, 30 To test whether 39 inhibits cell migration, cells were treated with 39 for 4 hours, and then subjected to a transwell migration assay. 39 was found to show nearly 50% inhibition in cell migration (Figure 7b). Taken together, the inhibitory effects of 39 on cell proliferation, protein translation, Akt phosphorylation and cell migration of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, can be explained by its inhibitory effect on eEF1A2. However, it would be very difficult to prove that the cellular and biochemical effects caused by 39 are mediated entirely through eEF1A2. More studies will be needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of action of this anticancer flavonoid compound.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Cells were treated with DMSO, 2, 4, and 8μM of 39 for 8 hours followed by depletion of methionine for 1 hour. Before lysing the cells, 35S-labeled methionine were incubated with the cells for 3 hours. Cell lysate were resolved by SDS-PAGE. (a) 35S labeled proteins were detected by phosphoimager. A decrease of 35S-methionine incorporation into protein was shown. (b) Commassie blue staining of the same gel was shown as loading control.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with DMSO and 2μM of 39 for 6 hours and 12 hours, respectively. Total protein was extracted, and subjected to western blot analysis using anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473 and Thr308), and anti-β actin. (b) MDA-MB-231 Cells were treated with DMSO or 2μM of 39 for 4 hours, and then seeded into a transwell. After 48 hours, cell migration to the bottom well was monitored, and cells were counted and expressed as numbers of cells per field. The experiments were carried out at least twice with triple counts. * indicate p<0.05.

Conclusion

A series of flavone analogues were synthesized and evaluated against breast cancer cells. The primary compounds (10 and 24) had an imidazole ring attached on the flavone and were found to exhibit modest activity against breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231(ER-) and MCF-7 ER+)). Furthermore, eEF1A1 was demonstrated to be a target protein of 10 and 24 through screening T7 phage display (human breast tumor cDNA expression) proteome library. Importantly, subsequent SAR study indicated that simplification of 10 resulted in 39 with more potent anticancer activity, suggesting that the imidazole ring is not needed for the desired activity; whereas, the original nitro group is necessary for anticancer activity. Additionally, 39 was found to selectively bind to eEF1A2. Overall, our results establish that 39 is an excellent drug lead with novel mechanisms against breast cancer.

Experimental Section

Materials and Methods

TentaGel S NH2 resin (90 μm, 0.26 mmol/g) was purchased from Rapp Polymere GmbH (Tübingen, Germany). Rink amide MBHA resin (0.5 mmol/g), amino acid derivatives, HOBt, and DIC were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai, China). 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid was synthesized in our laboratory.15 All solvents and other chemical reagents were purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) and were analytical grade. Analytical HPLC analyses (Vydac column; 4.6 mm × 250mm; 5 μm; 300Å; C18; 1.0mL/min; 25-min gradient from 100% aqueous H2O (0.1% TFA) to 100% CH3CN (0.1% TFA); 214, 220, 254 and 280nm) were performed on a Beckman System Gold HPLC system (Fullerton, CA), or on Waters 2996 photodiode array Detector, a Waters 2525 Binary Gradient Module, a Waters 2767 Sample Manager equipped with a 4.6 × 150 mm Waters Xterra® MS C18 5.0 μm column employing a 20 min gradient from 100% aqueous H2O (0.1% TFA) to 100% CH3CN (0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. NMR was recorded on a Bruker DRX spectrometer (Billerica, MA) in DMSO-d6 at 25 °C (500 MHz for 1H NMR, 125MHz for 13C NMR spectra). The purity of all the compounds was assessed by RP-HPLC under 254nm. All final compounds were confirmed to be ≥95% purity by analysis of their peak area. ESIMS was performed with Finnigan LCQ. The dissociation constants were obtained using Biacore 3000 system (Biacore Inc. Piscataway, NJ). MDA-MB-231 cells and MCF-7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas,VA). T7 phage expressing human breast tumor cDNA, T7 up primer, T7 down primer, and NovaTaq Hot Start DNA Polymerase were purchased from Novagen (Madison, WI). ExoSAP-IT PCR clean-up kit was purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.(Piscataway, NJ) Anti-eEF1A antibody was purchased from Cell signaling Technology, Inc.(Danvers, MA). Tagged eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 proteins were purchased for, Abcam, Inc. (Cambridge, MA).

Preparation of compounds 7-32

Synthesis of Compounds 7-17

For each compound, 200mg of Rink-MBHA resin was swollen in DMF for 2h. The resin was treated with 20% piperidine(v:v) in DMF (2×15min). The resin was then thoroughly washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF. A mixture of Fmoc-AA-OH (3equiv), HOBt(3equiv) and DIC(3equiv) was added to the resin, the final mixture was shaken until a negative Kaiser Test was obtained. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF, followed by Fmoc deprotection. A solution of 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid (2equiv), HOBt (3equiv) and DIC (3equiv) was added to the resin. The final mixture was shaken until the Kaiser Test was negative. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF, and then added a solution of various amines (1M) in 25% DIEPA/DMF. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was drained off. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. 2M SnCl2/DMF (3mL) was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight. After washing with DMF, MeOH, and DMF, the resin was added a solution of various Isothiocyanates (1M) and DIC (1M) in DMF. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was removed. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM. After TFA cleavage, the crude product was purified by HPLC.

Compound 7, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.77(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.19(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.05(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.94(brs, 1H), 7.74(s, 1H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.38-7.44(m, 3H), 7.33(brs, 1H), 7.29(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.03(s, 2H), 6.94(brs, 1H), 6.67(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 5.64(s, 2H), 3.87(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.80(s, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 610.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 8, yellow solid; Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.79(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.08(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.92(brs, 1H), 7.78(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 7.69(brs, 1H), 7.61(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.36-7.40(m, 3H), 7.14(s, 1H), 7.03(s, 1H), 6.97(brs, 1H), 6.70(s, 1H), 6.62(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 6.55(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 4.55(brs, 2H), 3.87(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 2.91(t, J=5Hz, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 658.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 9, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.70(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.20(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.05(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.79(s, 1H), 7.73(brs, 1H), 7.32(brs, 1H), 7.06(s, 2H), 6.90(brs, 1H), 6.88(s, 1H), 6.79(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 5.98(s, 2H), 5.34(brs, 2H), 4.79(m, 2H), 4.79(m, 1H), 3.45(q, J=5Hz, 2H), 2.64-2.85(m, 2H), 1.68(m, J=5Hz, 2H), 0.95(t, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 612.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 10, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.51(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.29(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.09(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 7.84(s, 1H), 7.61(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.36(brs, 1H), 7.09(s, 1H), 7.05(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 6.92(brs, 1H), 4.51(m, 2H), 3.81(s, 3H), 2.30(m, 1H), 2.03(m, 1H), 1.83(m, 1H),1.75(m, 1H), 1.70(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.59-1.62(m, 3H), 1.35(m, 1H), 1.07-1.21(m, 4H), 0.95(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.93(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 650.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 11, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.49(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.18(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.08(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.81(s, 1H), 7.76(s, 1H), 7.35(brs, 1H), 7.04(s, 1H), 6.97(s, 1H), 6.90(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 6.89(s, 2H), 5.98(s, 2H), 5.40(s, 2H), 4.50(m, 1H), 4.31(brs, 1H), 4.19(q, J=5Hz, 2H), 1.69-1.72(m, 2H), 1.59(m, 1H), 1.23(t, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.93(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.91(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 654.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 12, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.54(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.27(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.03(s, 1H), 7.99(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.91(brs, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.40(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.14(s, 1H), 7.13(brs, 2H), 7.06(s, 1H), 7.00(brs, 1H), 6.65(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 4.80(m, 1H), 4.60(m, 1H), 3.05(m, 1H), 2.91(m, 1H), 2.21(m, 1H), 2.04(m, 1H), 1.69(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.83(t, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 700.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 13, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.53(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.24(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.98(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.86(brs, 1H), 7.59(brs, 1H), 7.41-7.45(m, 4H), 7.21(brs, 1H), 7.13(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.00(s, 1H), 6.97(brs, 1H), 6.65(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 4.92(m, 1H), 4.61(m, 1H), 3.05(m, 1H), 2.91(m, 1H), 2.25(m, 1H), 1.72(m, 1H), 1.60(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.48(m, 1H), 0.98(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.87(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 728.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 14, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.52(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.87(s, 1H), 7.73(s, 1H), 7.70(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.64(brs, 2H), 7.37(s, 1H), 7.05(s, 1H), 7.00(brs, 1H), 6.68(d, J=5Hz 1H), 6.61(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 6.53(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 4.52(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 4.44(m, 1H), 2.90(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 2.35(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 2.10(m, 1H), 1.97(m, 1H). ESI-MS m/z: 788.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 15, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.53(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.29(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.06(s, 1H), 7.90(s, 1H), 7.70(s, 1H), 7.53(brs, 1H), 7.34-7.38(m, 2H), 7.09(s, 1H), 7.00-7.04(m, 2H), 4.94(m, 1H), 4.45(m, 1H), 2.52(s, 3H), 2.35(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 2.24(m, 1H), 2.11(m, 1H), 1.98(m, 1H), 1.80(m, 1H), 1.69(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 1.34(m, 1H), 0.93(t, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.82(t, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 656.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 16, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.31(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.07(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.02(s, 1H), 7.94(s, 1H), 7.83(brs, 1H), 7.57(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.41(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.37(brs, 1H), 7.07(s, 1H), 7.04(brs, 1H), 6.88(td, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 4.80(m, 1H), 4.40(m, 1H), 4.13(m, 1H), 2.21(m, 1H), 2.03(m, 1H), 1.68(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.15(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.82(t, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 572.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 17, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.26(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.06(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.99(brs, 1H), 7.82(s, 1H), 7.81(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.37(brs, 1H), 7.07(s, 1H), 7.05(brs, 1H), 4.40(m, 2H), 4.13(m, 1H), 1.64-1.68(m, 3H), 1.15(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.98(d, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 593.5 [M+H]+.

Synthesis of Compounds 18-20

200mg Rink-MBHA resin was swollen in DMF for 2h. The resin was treated with 20% piperidine(v:v) in DMF (2×15min). After thorough washing with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF, a mixture of 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid(2equiv), HOBt(3equiv) and DIC(3equiv) was added to the resin. The final mixture was shaken until a negative Kaiser Test was obtained. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM, and added a solution of various amines (1M) in 25% DIEPA/DMF. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was drained off. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. 2M SnCl2/DMF (3mL) was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight. The resin was added a solution of various isothiocyanates (1M) and DIC(1M) in DMF followed by washing with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was removed. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM. After TFA cleavage, the crude product was purified by HPLC.

Compound 18, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.21(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.17(s, 1H), 8.08(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.86(s, 1H), 7.74(s, 1H), 7.65(brs, 2H), 7.57(s, 1H), 7.44(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.33(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.18(m, 1H), 7.10(m, 2H), 7.09(s, 1H), 4.67(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 3.16(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 519.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 19, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.29(brs, 2H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.17(s, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.92(s, 1H), 7.88(s, 1H), 7.64(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.56(s, 1H), 7.40(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.09(s, 1H), 4.57(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 3.75(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 3.26(s, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 523.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 20, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.22(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.17(s, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.56(s, 1H), 7.47(m, 2H), 7.25(m, 1H), 7.10(s, 1H), 4.42(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 2.90(t, J=7.5Hz, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 553.5 [M+H]+.

Synthesis of Compound 21-28

200mg Rink-MBHA resin was swollen in DMF for 2h. The resin was incubated with 20% 4-methylpiperidine(v:v) in DMF (2×15min). The resin was then thoroughly washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF. A mixture of Fmoc-AA-OH (3equiv), HOBt(3equiv) and DIC(3equiv) was added to the resin, the final mixture was shaken until the Kaiser Test was negative. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF, followed by Fmoc deprotection. A solution of 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid(2equiv), HOBt(3equiv) and DIC(3equiv) was added to the resin. The final mixture was shaken until the Kaiser Test was negative. A solution of amines (1M) in 25% DIEPA/DMF was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was drained off. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. 2M SnCl2/DMF (3mL) was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight. The resin was then washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. A solution of aldehydes (10equiv) in 5%HOAc/DMF (3mL) was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was removed. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM. After TFA cleavage, the crude product was purified by HPLC.

Compound 21, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.89(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.74(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.37(s, 1H), 8.31(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.28(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.22(s, 1H), 8.19(s, 1H), 8.18(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.09(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.07(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.01(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.89(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.16(brs, 1H), 7.13(s, 1H), 6.95(brs, 1H), 4.80(m, 1H), 4.40(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 2.82(m, 1H), 2.64(m, 1H), 1.66(q, J=5Hz, 2H), 1.54(m, 1H), 0.81(d, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 635.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 22, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.69(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.42(s, 1H), 8.33(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.33(s, 1H), 8.00(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.94(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.82(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.80(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.59(brs, 1H), 7.54(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(m, 1H), 7.19(s, 1H), 7.15(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.11(brs, 1H), 6.67(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 4.51-4.68(m, 2H), 3.05(m, 1H), 2.90(m, 1H), 2.25(m, 1H), 1.99(m, 1H), 1.78(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.58(t, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 677.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 23, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.68(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.39(s, 1H), 8.33(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.28(s, 1H), 8.00(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.69(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.57(brs, 1H), 7.15(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.15(s, 1H), 7.10(brs, 1H), 6.64(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 4.71(m, 1H), 4.60(m, 1H), 3.88(s, 3H), 3.02(m, 1H), 2.90(m, 1H), 2.18(m, 1H), 1.78(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.73(m, 1H), 1.10(m, 1H), 0.65(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.58(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 659.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 24, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.72(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.24(s, 1H), 8.19(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.09(s, 1H), 7.97(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.60(brs, 1H), 7.35(d, J=10Hz, 4H), 7.25(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.13(m, 4H), 7.10(s, 1H), 5.67(s, 2H), 4.66(m, 1H), 3.36(m, 1H), 3.13(dd, 1H), 3.00(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 1.78(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 1.28(d, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 585.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 25, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.91(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.30(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.29(s, 1H), 8.27(s, 1H), 8.09(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.85(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.44(brs, 1H), 7.18(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.15(s, 1H), 7.08(brs, 1H), 4.36(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.88(s, 3H), 3.86(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 1.11(m, 1H), 0.41(m, 2H), 0.24(m, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 523.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 26, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.92(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.37(s, 1H), 8.36(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.34(s, 1H), 8.09(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.85(m, 2H), 7.69(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.60(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.44(brs, 1H), 7.17(s, 1H), 7.08(brs, 1H), 4.20(m, 1H), 3.87(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 2.24(m, 2H), 2.02(m, 2H), 0.68(t, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 587.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 27, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.25(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.23(s, 1H), 8.14(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.00(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.02(s, 1H), 7.44(brs, 1H), 7.36(m, 1H), 7.24(m, 1H), 7.07(s, 1H), 7.07(brs, 1H), 6.77(brs, 1H), 5.70(s, 2H), 4.36(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 4.10(m, 1H), 2.52(m, 1H), 1.28(d, J=10Hz, 6H), 1.09(d, J=10Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 575.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 28, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.35(s, 1H), 8.33(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 8.24(s, 1H), 8.17(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.12(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.46(brs, 1H), 4.60(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 4.37(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 4.11(m, 1H), 3.88(s, 9H), 3.85(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.78(d, J=10Hz, 6H), 1.13(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 631.6 [M+H]+.

Synthesis of Compounds 29-32

200mg Rink-MBHA resin was swollen in DMF for 2h. The resin was retreated with 20% piperidine(v:v) in DMF (2×15min). The resin was then thoroughly washed with DMF, MeOH, DCM and DMF. A mixture of 4-(7-Fluoro-6-nitro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)-benzoic acid(2equiv), HOBt(3equiv) and DIC(3equiv) was added to the resin. The final mixture was shaken until the Kaiser Test was negative. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM, and added a solution of various amines (1M) in 25% DIEPA/DMF. The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was drained off. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF. 2M SnCl2/DMF (3mL) was added to the resin. The mixture was shaken overnight. After washed with DMF, MeOH, and DMF, the resin was added a solution of aldehyde (10equiv) in 5%HOAc/DMF (3mL). The mixture was shaken overnight, and the supernatant was removed. The resin was washed with DMF, MeOH, and DCM. After TFA cleavage, the crude product was purified by HPLC.

Compound 29, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.32(s, 1H), 8.27(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.26(s, 1H), 8.18(brs, 1H), 8.09(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.06(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.91(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.81(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.54(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(m, 1H), 7.15(s, 1H), 4.59(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.90(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.39(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.33(t, J=5Hz, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 546.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 30, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.26(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.18(s, 2H), 8.12(brs, 1H), 8.06(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.57(brs, 1H), 7.11(s, 1H), 4.18(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 1.88(m, 1H), 1.68(m, 2H), 1.62(m, 1H), 1.54(m, 2H), 1.37(d, J=5Hz, 6H), 1.16(m, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 444.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 31, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.40(s, 1H), 8.35(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.29(s, 1H), 8.20(s, 1H), 8.08(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.17(s, 1H), 7.08(s, 1H), 6.91(s, 1H), 4.14(m, 1H), 3.93(s, 3H), 3.84(s, 3H), 3.74(s, 3H), 2.15(m, 1H), 1.93(m, 1H), 1.68(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.57(m, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 528.4 [M+H]+.

Compound 32, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.57(s, 2H), 8.43(s, 1H), 8.39(s, 1H), 8.32(s, 1H), 8.29(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.19(brs, 1H), 8.09(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.17(s, 1H), 4.40(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 1.70(m, 2H), 1.59(m, 1H), 0.82(d, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 588.5 [M+H]+.

MTT assay

Cells (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) were seeded in a 96well plate (5000cells/well) for 24hour. Cells were then treated with 10μM of compounds or varying concentrations of compounds for 72hr. Each compound or each concentration was tested as a triplicate. After 72 hours incubation, cells were washed with PBS for three times and then MTT was added for 4hours. Purple crystal formed was then dissolved in 0.04N HCl in isopropanol. The plates were read under 570nm.

Phage panning

TentaGel resins bound compound 10 and 24 were swelled in PBSTB (8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 137mM NaCl, 27mM KCl, 0.1 %(V/V) Tween 20, 0.1% (W/V) BSA, and 0.05 % (W/V) NaN3, pH 7.5 overnight, respectively. 10μL of each beads were incubated with 105 of phage in 1mL PBSTB for 2 hr. The beads were then washed extensively with PBSTB for 5 times and 50μL of log phase E. coli (strain BLT5403) were added and shaken for 30min at 37°C. The infected E. coli were then added to 1mL log phase E. coli, and shaken for 3hr at 37°C until all the E. coli were lysed. The E. coli debris was then spun down at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The amplified phage was used for a second round of panning. The panning was repeated three more times. Finally, the phage was mixed with log phase E. coli in soft agar for single colony on ampicilin plate. Single colony were picked and subjected to PCR for DNA sequencing. 1μL of amplified phage were used for PCR with NovaTaq Hot Start DNA Polymerase. T7 down primer (5′ - AACCCCTCAAGACCCGTTTA - 3′), and T7 up primer (5′ - GGAGCTGTCGTATTCCAGTC - 3′) were used as primer pair. The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 7 min and then repeat 34 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. The last cycle was extended for 1 more minute at 72 °C. The PCR product were cleaned up using ExoSAP-IT kit, and finally subjected to DNA sequencing.

Pull down assay

MDA-MB-231 were grown to 85% confluence and lysed with lysis buffer (PBS, protease inhibitor cocktail, DNAse, RNAse, and 0.1% TritonX-100). 1mM of biotinylated 10 and 24 were added to the cell lysate overnight in 4°C. Then the compounds were pulled down by incubating with avidin beads for 2 hr at 4°C. Beads were washed with PBS for 3 times and boiled with sampler buffer for 10min at 95°C. Samples were then run on SDS-PAGE and transferred on PVDF membrane following blotting with anti-eEF1A antibody (1:1000 dilution) and anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Cell Signaling Technology, MA).

Western blot analysis

MDA-MB-231 were grown to 80% confluence and treated with compound for 16 hours. Cells were then lysed with lysis buffer (25 mM tris HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM β-glycerol phosphate, 0.1% Triton-X 100, and protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysate was then separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. The membrane was blotted using anti-phosohoAkt (Ser 437 and Thr 308) (1:1000 dilution) and anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Cell Signaling Technology, MA).

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Analysis

One micromolar of biotinylated compounds 10, 24 and 39 in Biacore HBS-EP buffer were individually immobilized on 3 of the 4 flow cells on a streptavidin sensor chip (Biacore SA Chip) at 5uL/min for 10min each. The remaining one empty flow cell was assigned as a reference flow cell and was immobilized with Linker-Lysin-Biotin only. eEF1A1 and GST were 2-fold serial diluted in HBS-EP buffer from 20nM,to 1.25nM. eEF1A2 were 2-fold serial diluted in HBS-EP buffer from 100nM to 6.25nM. The protein at each concentration was then injected at 30uL/min for 3min and dissociated for 5 min. Kon, Koff, and Kd were evaluated by using BiaEvaluation software to fit binding curves with proper binding models.

Cell migration assay

MDA-MB-231 cells were grown to 80% confluence and treated with compound 39 (2μM) for 4 hours. 0.2ml of cells (5×105cell/mL) in serum free medium were seeded into the top chambers of 6.5-mm Corning Costar transwells (Corning, NY, New York, USA), and the bottom wells were loaded with complete medium. After 48 hours incubation, the images of cells in the bottom wells were captured and the cell number was counted.

35S-Methionine labeled protein translation assay

Cells were treated with DMSO or different concentration of 39 for 8 hours. Cell culture medium was then changed to methionine free medium for 1 hour. To start the translation labeling, 5 μL of 35S-methionine (specific activity >1000Ci/mMole) (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) were added to the cells and incubated for 3 hours. Cells were then harvested and lysed. Proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and stained with commassie blue. The same gel was then dried and the 35S-methionine was detected using phosphoimager.

Preparation of compounds 33-51

Compounds 33-51 were synthesized in the same manner as above.

Compound 33, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.72(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.19(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.96(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.86(s, 1H), 7.82(brs, 1H), 7.67(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.60(s, 1H), 7.39(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.30-7.36(m, 4H), 7.25(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.13-7.19(m, 3H), 7.09(s, 1H), 7.06(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 5.62(s, 2H), 4.67(m, 1H), 3.79(s, 3H), 3.14(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 2.99(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H). ESI-MS m/z: 664.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 34, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.58(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.20(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.87(s, 1H), 7.83(brs, 1H), 7.66(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.44(brs, 1H), 7.39(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.34(m, 3H), 7.11(s, 1H), 7.06(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.00(s, 1H), 5.66(s, 2H), 4.48(m, 1H), 3.79(s, 3H), 1.61-1.73(m. 2H), 1.55(m, 1H), 0.92(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=10Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 630.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 35, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.76(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.29(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.24(s, 1H), 7.98(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.83(s, 1H), 7.63(brs, 1H), 7.56(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.37(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.26(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.19(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.15(brs, 2H), 7.11(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 4.68(m, 1H), 4.55(m, 1H), 3.82(s, 3H), 3.13(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 3.00(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 2.29(m, 1H), 2.04(m, 1H), 1.83(m, 1H), 1.72(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.62(m, 2H), 1.00-1.36(m, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 684.6 [M+H]+.

Compound 36, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.59(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.32(s, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.09(s, 1H), 8.08(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.34(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.31(s, 1H), 7.29(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.15(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.14(s, 1H), 7.00(s, 1H), 5.84(s, 2H), 4.48(m, 1H), 3.39(m, 1H), 1.63-1.74(m. 2H), 1.55(m, 1H), 1.29(d, J=5Hz, 6H), 0.92(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=10Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 551.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 37, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.76(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.37(brs, 1H), 8.31(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.22(s, 1H), 7.98(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.62(s, 1H), 7.36(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.26(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.18(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.17(s, 1H), 4.68(m, 1H), 4.41(m, 1H), 3.54(m, 1H), 3.15(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 3.08(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 2.29(m, 1H), 2.06(m, 1H), 1.84(m, 1H), 1.69(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.62(m, 2H), 1.52(1, 1H), 1.45(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 1.33(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.88-1.22(m, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 605.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 38, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.31(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.26(brs, 1H), 8.20(brs, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.83(s, 1H), 7.59(s, 1H), 7.54(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.16(s, 1H), 7.11(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 4.55(m, 1H), 3.82(s, 3H), 2.29(m, 1H), 2.04(m, 1H), 1.83(m, 1H), 1.72(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.62(m, 2H), 0.99-1.36(m, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 537.6 [M+H]+.

Compound 39, yellow solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.70(s, 1H), 8.61(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.08(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.36(s, 1H), 7.06(s, 1H), 7.00(s, 1H), 4.48(m, 1H), 3.81(m, 1H), 1.87(m, 1H), 1.55-1.75(m, 10H), 1.24(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 1.03-1.15(m, 3H), 0.93(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=10Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 549.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 40, yellow solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.70(s, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.14(brs, 1H), 8.10(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.05(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.37(s, 1H), 7.05(s, 1H), 3.80(m, 1H), 1.59-1.89(m, 7H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.00-1.18(m, 4H). ESI-MS m/z: 436.6 [M+H]+.

Compound 41, yellow solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ9.22(s, 1H), 8.57(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.17(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.06(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.80(s, 1H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 6.99(brs, 1H), 6.92(s, 1H), 6.85(s, 1H), 5.63(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 4.48(m, 1H), 3.52(m, 1H), 2.11(s, 3H), 1.87(m, 1H), 1.54-1.74(m, 8H), 1.16(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.98-1.23(m, 5H), 0.91(d, J=10Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=10Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 561.8 [M+H]+.

Compound 42, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.25(s, 1H), 8.21(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.16(brs, 1H), 8.06(s, 1H), 8.05(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.55(brs, 1H), 7.36(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.29(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.19(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 7.15(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.12(s, 1H), 5.68(s, 2H), 3.37(m, 1H), 1.29(d, J=5Hz, 6H). ESI-MS m/z: 438.5 [M+H]+.

Compound 43, orange solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.88(t, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.72(s, 1H), 8.71(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.12(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.94(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.60(brs, 1H), 7.45(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.39(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.35(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.28(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.25(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.16(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.14(s, 1H), 7.13(brs, 1H), 7.14(s, 1H), 7.02(s, 1H), 4.74(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 4.66(m, 1H), 3.13(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 2.99(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H). ESI-MS m/z: 563.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 44, yellow solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6):δ 9.33(s, 1H), 8.68(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.06(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.91(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.76(s, 1H), 7.58(brs, 1H), 7.43(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.36(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.34(t, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.23-7.27(m, 3H), 7.07-7.17(m, 3H), 6.88(s, 1H), 6.66(s, 1H), 4.65(m, 1H), 4.51(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 3.13(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 2.99(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 2.11(s, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 575.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 45, orange solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.71(s, 1H), 8.60(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.11(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.37(s, 1H), 7.06(s, 1H), 7.00(s, 1H), 4.47(m, 1H), 3.83(m, 1H), 1.55-1.90(m, 10H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.03-1.15(m, 4H), 0.93(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 549.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 46, orange solid, Purity, 98%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.71(s, 1H), 8.60(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.37(s, 1H), 7.06(s, 1H), 7.00(s, 1H), 4.47(m, 1H), 3.82(m, 1H), 1.55-1.90(m, 10H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.03-1.15(m, 4H), 0.93(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 549.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 47, orange solid, Purity, 96%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.70(s, 1H), 8.60(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.23(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=5Hz, 1H), 8.07(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.45(brs, 1H), 7.36(s, 1H), 7.06(s, 1H), 7.00(s, 1H), 4.47(m, 1H), 3.82(m, 1H), 1.54-1.89(m, 10H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.03-1.15(m, 4H), 0.93(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 0.89(d, J=5Hz, 3H). ESI-MS m/z: 549.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 48, orange solid, Purity, 99%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.74(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.70(s, 1H), 8.22(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.11(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.96(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.61(s, 1H), 7.36(s, 1H), 7.35(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.26(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.17(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.13(brs, 1H), 7.03(s, 1H), 4.66(m, 1H), 3.80(m, 1H), 3.14(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 3.00(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 1.54-1.89(m, 7H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.00-1.15(m, 4H). ESI-MS m/z: 583.7 [M+H]+.

Compound 49, orange solid, Purity, 97%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ8.74(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 8.70(s, 1H), 8.21(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 8.10(d, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.96(d, J=10Hz, 2H), 7.61(s, 1H), 7.36(s, 1H), 7.35(d, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.26(t, J=5Hz, 2H), 7.16(t, J=10Hz, 1H), 7.13(brs, 1H), 7.03(s, 1H), 4.66(m, 1H), 3.80(m, 1H), 3.14(dd, J=10, 5Hz, 1H), 3.00(dd, J=10, 10Hz, 1H), 1.59-1.89(m, 7H), 1.23(d, J=5Hz, 3H), 1.00-1.15(m, 4H). ESI-MS m/z: 583.7 [M+H]+.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by U.S. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program's Multidisciplinary Postdoctoral Training Award contract no. W81XWH-06-1-0447 (N. Yao), NIH R01CA115483, and U19CA113298. We thank Mr. David Olivos for editorial assistance.

The following additional abbreviations are used

Abbreviations used for amino acids and designation of peptides follow the rules of the IUPAC-IUB Commission of Biochemical Nomenclature in J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 977-983.

Fmoc

fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl

HOBt

N -Hydroxybenzotriazole

DIC

N, N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide

DIEPA

N, N-Diisopropylethylamine

TFA

trifluoroacetic acid

TIS

Triisopropylsilane

HOAc

Acetic acid

DMF

N,N-dimethylformamide

DCM

Dichloromethane

eEF1A

eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha

ESI

electrospray ionization

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

RP-HPLC

reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, Surface Plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis, and Biological data. This material is available free of charge via the Internal at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Albrand G, Terret C. Early breast cancer in the elderly: assessment and management considerations. Drugs Aging. 2008;25:35–45. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baumann CK, Castiglione-Gertsch M. Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Drugs. 2007;67:2335–2353. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767160-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coley HM. Mechanisms and strategies to overcome chemotherapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:378–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabaglio M, Aebi S, Castiglione-Gertsch M. Controversies of adjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer and recommendations of the 2007 St Gallen conference. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:940–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70317-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kolb VM. Biomimicry as a basis for drug discovery. Prog Drug Res. 1998;51:185–217. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8845-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grabley S, Thiericke R. Bioactive agents from natural sources: trends in discovery and application. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1999;64:101–154. doi: 10.1007/3-540-49811-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vuorelaa P, Leinonenb M, Saikkuc P, Tammelaa P, Rauhad JP, Wennberge T, Vuorela H. Natural products in the process of finding new drug candidates. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:1375–1389. doi: 10.2174/0929867043365116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Di Carlo G, Mascolo N, Izzo AA, Capasso F. Flavonoids: old and new aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs. Life Sci. 1999;65:337–353. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jankun J, Selman SH, Swiercz R, Skrzypczak-Jankun E. Why drinking green tea could prevent cancer. Nature. 1997;387:561. doi: 10.1038/42381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Birt DF, Hendrich S, Wang W. Dietary agents in cancer prevention: flavonoids and isoflavonoids. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;90:157–177. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bauvois B, Puiffe ML, Bongui JB, Paillat S, Monneret C, Dauzonne D. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel flavone-8-acetic acid derivatives as reversible inhibitors of aminopeptidase N/CD13. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3900–3913. doi: 10.1021/jm021109f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Menichincheri M, Ballinari D, Bargiotti A, Bonomini L, Ceccarelli W, D'Alessio R, Fretta A, Moll J, Polucci P, Soncini C, Tibolla M, Trosset JY, Vanotti E. Catecholic flavonoids acting as telomerase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6466–6475. doi: 10.1021/jm040810b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Monteiro R, Azevedo I, Calhau C. Modulation of aromatase activity by diet polyphenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:3535–3540. doi: 10.1021/jf053237t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kubo I, Kinst-Hori I, Chaudhuri SK, Kubo Y, Sanchez Y, Ogura T. Flavonols from Heterotheca inuloides: tyrosinase inhibitory activity and structural criteria. Bioorg Med Chem. 2000;8:1749–1755. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(00)00102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yao N, Song A, Wang X, Dixon S, Lam KS. Synthesis of flavonoid analogues as scaffolds for natural product-based combinatorial libraries. J Comb Chem. 2007;9:668–676. doi: 10.1021/cc070009y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scott JK, Smith GP. Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library. Science. 1990;249:386–390. doi: 10.1126/science.1696028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ballinger MD, Shyamala V, Forrest LD, Deuter-Reinhard M, Doyle LV, Wang JX, Panganiban-Lustan L, Stratton JR, Apell G, Winter JA, Doyle MV, Rosenberg S, Kavanaugh WM. Semirational design of a potent, artificial agonist of fibroblast growth factor receptors. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1199–1204. doi: 10.1038/70746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zozulya S, Lioubin M, Hill RJ, Abram C, Gishizky ML. Mapping signal transduction pathways by phage display. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1193–1198. doi: 10.1038/70736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Piggott AM, Karuso P. Rapid identification of a protein binding partner for the marine natural product kahalalide F by using reverse chemical proteomics. Chembiochem. 2008;9:524–530. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu X, Zhao P, Zhang W, Zhang L, Zhang Y. Screening of phage displayed human liver cDNA library against dexamethasone. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;45:701–705. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jin Y, Yu J, Yu YG. Identification of hNopp140 as a binding partner for doxorubicin with a phage display cloning method. Chem Biol. 2002;9:157–162. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00096-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lam KS, Lebl M, Krchnak V. The “One-Bead-One-Compound” Combinatorial Library Method. Chem Rev. 1997;97:411–448. doi: 10.1021/cr9600114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Knudsen SM, F J, Clark BF, Leffers H. Tissue-dependent variation in the expression of elongation factor-1 alpha isoforms: isolation and characterisation of a cDNA encoding a novel variant of human elongation-factor 1 alpha. Eur J Biochem. 1993;215:549–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lamberti A, Caraglia M, Longo O, Marra M, Abbruzzese A, Arcari P. The translation elongation factor 1A in tumorigenesis, signal transduction and apoptosis: review article. Amino Acids. 2004;26:443–448. doi: 10.1007/s00726-004-0088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anand N, Murthy S, Amann G, Wernick M, Porter LA, Cukier IH, Collins C, Gray JW, Diebold J, Demetrick DJ, Lee JM. Protein elongation factor EEF1A2 is a putative oncogene in ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2002;31:301–305. doi: 10.1038/ng904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tomlinson VA, Newbery HJ, Wray NR, Jackson J, Larionov A, Miller WR, Dixon JM, Abbott CM. Translation elongation factor eEF1A2 is a potential oncoprotein that is overexpressed in two-thirds of breast tumours. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee J. The role of protein elongation factor eEF1A2 in ovarian cancer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:69. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li R, W H, Bekele BN, Yin Z, Caraway NP, Katz RL, et al. Identification of putative oncogenes in lung adenocarcinoma by a comprehensive functional genomic approach. Oncogene. 2005;25:2628–2635. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amiri A, Noei F, Jeganathan S, Kulkarni G, Pinke DE, Lee JM. eEF1A2 activates Akt and stimulates Akt-dependent actin remodeling, invasion and migration. Oncogene. 2007;26:3027–3040. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bunai F, Ando K, Ueno H, Numata O. Tetrahymena eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) bundles filamentous actin through dimer formation. J Biochem. 2006;140:393–399. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvj169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES