Abstract
Previous work in this laboratory established that the readily available F-ring aromatic analog of cyclopamine is a highly potent inhibitor of Hedgehog signaling. The synthesis and biological evaluation of two F-ring saturated analogs that are more potent than the F-ring aromatic structure are reported.
Some time ago it was found that ingestion of the California corn lily, veratrum californicum, by pregnant sheep could induce cyclopia and other profound developmental defects in the offspring. Keeler and coworkers established that the active constituent in the plant is the alkaloid cyclopamine 1 (Figure 1),i and it was later found that cyclopamine mediates this effect by interfering with Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling,ii specifically via the inhibition of the transmembrane protein Smoothened (SMO).iii SHH signaling is active in the majority of sporadic basal cell carcinomasiv and also in brain tumors, including medulloblastomas and gliomas.v This signaling pathway has also been linked to melanoma,vi lung adenocarcinoma,vii as well as prostate,viii small cell lung,ix and pancreatic cancer.x As a result, the development of inhibitors of the SHH cellular signaling pathway has emerged as an important goal in medicinal chemistry.xi The most common strategy in the pharmaceutical industry has involved the screening of libraries of diverse chemical structures in the hope of discovering drug-like structures that will interfere with SHH signaling. The most noteworthy success to date using this approach is GDC-0449 2 (Figure 1), a compound that is currently in Phase II clinical trials.xii
Figure 1.

Structures of Cyclopamine 1, GDC-0449 2, Estrone Analog 3 and Saturated Analog 4
Using a conceptually different approach, we have recently shown that designed, structurally simplified, cyclopamine-like structures such as the estrone-derived analog 3 (Figure 1) are potent inhibitors of Hedgehog signaling.xiii These analogs offer two important advantages over cyclopamine 1: 1) they do not contain the allylic ether present in 1 that confers metabolic, i.e., acid, instability; and 2) they are easily prepared (four chemical steps) from commercially available steroids, i.e., estrone.
There are several important structural differences between the estrone-derived lead structure 3 and cyclopamine 1, notably the presence of the aromatic A and F rings in 3 that are not present in 1 (Figure 1). We report herein the design and synthesis of F-ring saturated analogs of 3 that are related to 4, that contains the same relative stereochemistry at C-22 and C-23 as cyclopamine 1, and that the SHH signaling inhibitory activity of these new analogs is greater than that of cyclopamine 1 in medulloblastoma cell viability assays.
While the direct reduction of the pyridine ring in 3 would appear to be the most direct approach to the synthesis of F-ring saturated analogs, i.e., 4, we have found the pyridine ring in 3 resistant to direct reduction without extensive decomposition.
Instead, we have developed an alternative approach to the synthesis of F-ring saturated analogs, that leads, inter alia, to the synthesis of novel structural analogs lacking the E-ring tetrahydrofuran present in both 1 and in 3. These new compounds are highly potent inhibitors of SHH signaling, suggesting that the tetrahydrofuran E ring of cyclopamine is not required for biological function.
We envisioned that the EF heterocyclic moiety of the target structure 4 could be prepared via nitrenium ion mediated bicyclization of 5 (Figure 2). Elegant studies by Wardropxiv have suggested that such an approach should be feasible. We have initiated a more incremental approach to the synthesis of the EF heterobicyclic ring system, via iodoetherification of 7 to give 6, which on treatment with ammonia would generate the requisite EF heterobicyclic ring system. The synthesis and reaction of the key iodoetherification substrate 10 is outlined in Scheme 1.
Figure 2.

Complementary Approaches ot the Synthesis of the F-Ring Saturated Analog 4
Scheme 1.
Synthesis and Cyclization of E-Alkene Substrate 10 to give 12
Reaction of the known epoxide 8xv (Scheme 1) with the anion formed from the t-butyldiphenylsilyl ether of 4-pentynol and removal of the silyl protecting group with TBAF provided alkynol 9. Reduction of 9 with LiAlH4stereoselectively provided the (E)-alkenol that was reacted with TsCl to generate 10. In analogy to the work of Knightxvi and Lipshutzxvii on the iodocyclization of homoallylic alcohols, exposure of 10 to iodine and sodium bicarbonate efficiently led to the anticipated trans-β-iodotetrahydrofuran 11 as a single diastereomer.xviii
The stereochemical outcome of the reaction is consistent with the model proposed by Knight, in which conformation A, which leads to the formation of the observed product 11, is favored over conformation B, which would lead to the formation of the diastereomeric trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran 13 (only the hydrindane moiety of the estrone framework is shown; Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Rationale for the Observed Formation of 11 and not 13 in the Cyclization of E-Alkene 10
Reaction of 11 with liquid ammonia afforded a piperidine product via displacement of both the iodide and tosylate moieties present in 10, followed by reductive debenzylation to generate 12 (in nine chemical steps and 23% overall yield from estrone), the structure of which was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis of the derived para-bromobenzamide. We note that 12 is epimeric with the target structure 4 (Figure 1) at C-22, i.e., cis- instead of trans-EF ring fusion.
Although the work of Knight had demonstrated that the iodoetherification of Z-homoallylic alcohols was slower than that of the E-alkene substrates, we envisioned that the trans EF ring fusion stereochemistry found in cyclopamine and in 4 could result from analogous reaction of 14, the Z-alkene corresponding to 10, the synthesis of which is outlined in Scheme 2.
Scheme 2.

Synthesis and Cyclization of Z-Alkene Substrate 14 to Give Pyrrolidino-Oxetane 16
In the event, Lindlar reduction of 9 (Scheme 1) afforded 14, which on exposure to iodine-mediated cyclization conditions afforded not the anticipated tetrahydrofuran product analogous to 11 (Scheme 1) but instead the oxetane 15 in 64% yield. Reaction of bis-electrophile 15 with ammonia afforded the oxetane-pyrrolidine 16 in 55% overall yield after O-debenzylation. The stereochemistry of 16 was unequivocally established by X-ray crystallographic analysis of the derived 3,5-dinitrobenzamide, confirming that the cyclization occurred with the analogous orientation of the Z-alkene (A’ in Scheme 2) as shown in A for the E-alkene cyclization substrate 10 (Scheme 1). However, instead of the anticipated tetrahydrofuran product (the result of 5-endo cyclization), based on the work of Knight, we observed the exclusive formation of the oxetane product 15, the result of 4-exo cyclization of 14. The basis for this surprising regiochemical outcome is currently under study in our laboratory.
Preliminary biological evaluation of 12 and 16 reveals that both are highly potent inhibitors of Hedgehog signaling, comparable to cyclopamine 1 in potency.xix We first tested 12 and 16 for their activity on the SHH signaling pathway by using the SHH-Light2 cells: this cell line is a 3T3 clone that stably expresses a GLI-dependent reporter.xx Treatment of these cells with recombinant SHH activates GLI-dependent firefly luciferase expression and this SHH-induced activation is inhibited when cells are also treated with cyclopamine 1. In this assay, SHH-light2 cells were treated with SHH (600 ng/ml, R&D) alone or in combination with cyclopamine 1, 12 or 16 (all at 5 μM). As illustrated in Figure 4, 12 and 16 both lead to a strong inhibition of SHH signaling activity comparable to that of cyclopamine.
Figure 4.

12 and 16 are potent inhibitors of the SHH-induced GLI-luciferase activity in SHH-Light2 cells. The asterisk indicates p-value p <0.001.
Granule neuron precursors (GNPs) represent a physiological system for the testing of SHH inhibition, as SHH is a potent mitogen for postnatal mouse cerebellar GNPs,xxi and cyclopamine 1 is known to block their proliferation.xxii In the event, GNPs were purified from postnatal day 5 (P5) mouse cerebella and treated with either SHH alone or in combination with 1, 12 or 16 (all at 5 μM). BrdU was added to the media 6 hours before fixation. Percentage of brdU positive cells were determined by counting with a fluorescence microscope using a 20X objective (Axioskop, Zeiss). At least five independent fields for each culture condition were counted. The analysis was performed on three independent experiments. As illustrated in Figure 5, GNP proliferation in response to SHH signalling activation is blocked with 1 as well as with compounds 12 and 16.
Figure 5.

12 and 16 block SHH-induced granule neuron precursor (GNP) proliferation. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student t test. The asterisk indicates the following p-value: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Abnormal activation of the SHH signaling pathway has been linked to various cancers including medulloblastoma, a malignancy of the cerebellum with the highest incidence of all human pediatric malignant brain tumors.xxiii A subset of these tumors is thought to arise from deregulation of granule neuron precursor (GNP) development in the cerebellum and require SHH signaling for their growth. We thus tested whether compounds 12 and 16 were also efficient in reducing the viability of medulloblastoma cells using human medulloblastoma DAOY cells. DAOY cells were treated for 72 hours with either cyclopamine 1, 12 or 16 before cell survival was assayed with a colorimetric MTT assay, in which absorbance at 570 nm is directly proportional to the number of living cells. As illustrated in Figure 6, there is a significant decrease in cell survival when the cells are treated with either cyclopamine 1, 12, or 16, and that both 12 and 16 are more active in reducing DAOY cell viability than 1.
Figure 6.

Effect of 12 and 16 on cell survival of human medulloblastoma DAOY cells. The asterisk indicates p-value p<0.05.
The significance of the structures of 12 and 16 for observed potency in these diverse biological systems is underscored by the recent disclosure of the synthesis and biological activity of desmethylveramiline 17, which represents a des-E analog of cyclopamine 1, by Mann and coworkers (Figure 7). xxiv They report that 17 is ca. 50% less potent than 1 in the same SHH-light2 assay described in Figure 4, in which 16 is equipotent with 1, suggesting that the rigidity imparted by the oxetane ring is important to the observed potency of 16.
Figure 7.

Desmethylveramiline
We have developed structurally novel analogs 12 and 16 of cyclopamine 1 that exhibit enhanced potency relative to 1 in both GNP proliferation and MAOY medulloblastoma cellular assays. Further studies on stereoisomeric analogs of 12 and 16 and related structures are currently underway in our laboratory and our results will be reported in due course.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge the NIH (CA-134983) for their generous support of this work and the NSF for an X-ray diffractometer (CHE-0840438). We would like to thank Dr. Patrick Carroll for X-ray structure determinations, Drs. George Furst and Jun Gu for their assistance with NMR spectroscopy, and Dr. Rongbiao Tong (Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania) for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available Full experimental details, characterization data and NMR spectra of all compounds, and crystallographic data (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- i.a) Binns W, James L, Keeler R, Balls L. Cancer Res. 1968;28:2323–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Keeler R, Binns W. Can J Biochem. 1966;44:829–38. doi: 10.1139/o66-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ii.Cooper M, Porter J, Young K, Beachy P. Science. 1998;280:1603–7. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5369.1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Incardona J, Gaffield W, Kapur R, Roelink H. Development. 1998;125:3553–62. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.18.3553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- iii.Chen J, Taipale J, Cooper M, Beachy P. Genes Dev. 2002;1627:43–8. doi: 10.1101/gad.1025302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- iv.Dahmane N, Lee J, Robbins P, Heller P, Ruiz A, Altaba I. Nature. 1997;389:876–81. doi: 10.1038/39918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- v.a) Berman D, Karhadkar S, Hallahan A, Pritchard J, Eberhart C, Watkins D, Chen J, Taipale J, Olson J, Beachy P. Science. 2002;297:1559–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1073733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Clement V, Sanchez P, de Tribolet N, Radovanovic I, Ruiz i Altaba A. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:165–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Dahmane N, Sanchez P, Gitton Y, Palma V, Sun T, Beyna M, Weiner H, Ruiz i Altaba A. Development. 2001;128:5201–12. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.24.5201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- vi.Stecca B, Mas C, Clement V, Zbinden M, Correa R, Piguet V, Beermann F, Ruiz A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci .U S A. 2007;104:5895–900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700776104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- vii.Yuan Z, Goetz J, Singh S, Ogden S, Petty W, Black C, Memoli V, Dmitrovsky E, Robbins D. Oncogene. 2007;26:1046–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- viii.a) Karhadkar S, Bova G, Abdallah N, Dhara S, Gardner D, Maitra A, Isaacs J, Berman D, Beachy P. Nature. 2004;431:707–12. doi: 10.1038/nature02962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sanchez P, Hernandez A, Stecca B, Kahler A, DeGueme A, Barrett A, Beyna M, Datta M, Datta S, Ruiz A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12561–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404956101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sheng T, Li C, Zhang X, Chi S, He N, Chen K, McCormick F, Gatalica Z, Xie J. Mol Cancer. 2004;3:29. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-3-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ix.Watkins D, Berman D, Burkholder S, Wang B, Beachy P, Baylin S. Nature. 2003;422:313–7. doi: 10.1038/nature01493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- x.Berman D, Karhadkar S, Maitra A, Montes D, Gerstenblith M, Briggs K, Parker A, Shimada Y, Eshleman J, Watkins D, Beachy P. Nature. 2003;425:846–51. doi: 10.1038/nature01972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xi.For recent SAR on cyclopamine-derived structures, see Heretsch P, Buttner A, Tzagkaroulaki L, Zahn S, Kirchner B, Giannis A. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:7362–7364. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11782c. Tremblay M, Nevalainen M, Nair S, Porter J, Castro A, Behnke M, Yu L, Hagel M, White K, Faia K, Grenier L, Campbell M, Cushing J, Woodward C, Hoyt J, Foley M, Read M, Sydor J, Tong J, Palombella V, McGovern K, Adams J. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:6646–6649. doi: 10.1021/jm8008508. For a general discussion, see Dolgin E. Nature Medicine. 2011;17:523. doi: 10.1038/nm0511-523.
- xii.Sheridan C. Nature Biotech. 2009;27:968–969. doi: 10.1038/nbt1109-968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xiii.Winkler J, Isaacs A, Holderbaum L, Tatard V, Dahmane N. Org Lett. 2009;11:2824–7. doi: 10.1021/ol900974u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xiv.Wardrop D, Bowen E, Forslund R, Sussman A, Weerasekera S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1188–1189. doi: 10.1021/ja9069997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xv.Cook C, Corley R, Wall M. J. Org. Chem. 1968;33:2789–93. doi: 10.1021/jo01271a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xvi.Bedford S, Bell K, Bennett F, Hayes C, Knight D, Shaw D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 1999;15:2143–2153. [Google Scholar]
- xvii.Lipshutz B, Barton J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:1084–6. [Google Scholar]
- xviii.All compounds were characterized by full spectroscopic (NMR, IR, high resolution MS) data. Yields refer to spectroscopically and chromatographically homogeneous (>95%) materials.
- xix.Control experiments comparing the SHH inhibitory activity of estrone with 3 suggest that the activity of these estrone-derived analogs is not an estrogenic effect (Ref. 13).
- xx.Taipale J, Chen J, Cooper M, Wang B, Mann R, Milenkovic L, Scott M, Beachy P. Nature. 2000;406:1005–1009. doi: 10.1038/35023008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxi.Dahmane N, Ruiz i Altaba A. Development. 1999;26:3089–3100. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.14.3089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxii.Fernandez C, Tatard V, Bertrand N, Dahmane N. Dev Neurosci. 2010;32:59–70. doi: 10.1159/000274458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxiii.Ellison D. Neuropathol. 2010;120:305–316. doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0726-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxiv.Guerlet G, Spangenberg T, Mann A, Faure H, Ruat M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;21:2608–3612. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


