Skip to main content
PMC home page
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology logoLink to EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
. 2007 Feb 19;2007(1):16354. doi: 10.1155/2007/16354

Quantification of the Impact of Feature Selection on the Variance of Cross-Validation Error Estimation

Yufei Xiao 1,✉, Jianping Hua 2, Edward R Dougherty 1,2
PMCID: PMC3171328  PMID: 17713587

Abstract

Given the relatively small number of microarrays typically used in gene-expression-based classification, all of the data must be used to train a classifier and therefore the same training data is used for error estimation. The key issue regarding the quality of an error estimator in the context of small samples is its accuracy, and this is most directly analyzed via the deviation distribution of the estimator, this being the distribution of the difference between the estimated and true errors. Past studies indicate that given a prior set of features, cross-validation does not perform as well in this regard as some other training-data-based error estimators. The purpose of this study is to quantify the degree to which feature selection increases the variation of the deviation distribution in addition to the variation in the absence of feature selection. To this end, we propose the coefficient of relative increase in deviation dispersion (CRIDD), which gives the relative increase in the deviation-distribution variance using feature selection as opposed to using an optimal feature set without feature selection. The contribution of feature selection to the variance of the deviation distribution can be significant, contributing to over half of the variance in many of the cases studied. We consider linear-discriminant analysis, 3-nearest-neighbor, and linear support vector machines for classification; sequential forward selection, sequential forward floating selection, and the Inline graphic-test for feature selection; and Inline graphic-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation for error estimation. We apply these to three feature-label models and patient data from a breast cancer study. In sum, the cross-validation deviation distribution is significantly flatter when there is feature selection, compared with the case when cross-validation is performed on a given feature set. This is reflected by the observed positive values of the CRIDD, which is defined to quantify the contribution of feature selection towards the deviation variance.

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]

Contributor Information

Yufei Xiao, Email: fei@neo.tamu.edu.

Jianping Hua, Email: jhua@tgen.org.

Edward R Dougherty, Email: e-dougherty@tamu.edu.

References

  1. Devroye L, Gyorfi L, Lugosi G. A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braga-Neto U, Dougherty ER. Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification? Bioinformatics. 2004;20(3):374–380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braga-Neto U, Dougherty ER. Bolstered error estimation. Pattern Recognition. 2004;37(6):1267–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2003.08.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sima C, Braga-Neto U, Dougherty ER. Superior feature-set ranking for small samples using bolstered error estimation. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(7):1046–1054. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sima C, Attoor S, Brag-Neto U, Lowey J, Suh E, Dougherty ER. Impact of error estimation on feature selection. Pattern Recognition. 2005;38(12):2472–2482. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(15):3301–3307. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pudil P, Novovicova J, Kittler J. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters. 1994;15(11):1119–1125. doi: 10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Xiao Y, Hua J, Dougherty ER. Feature selection increases cross-validation imprecision. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics (GENSIPS '06), College Station, Tex, USA, May 2006.
  9. van't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ. et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415(6871):530–536. doi: 10.1038/415530a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ. et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(25):1999–2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Choudhary A, Brun M, Hua J, Lowey J, Suh E, Dougherty ER. Genetic test bed for feature selection. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(7):837–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jain A, Zongker D. Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1997;19(2):153–158. doi: 10.1109/34.574797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kudo M, Sklansky J. Comparison of algorithms that select features for pattern classifiers. Pattern Recognition. 2000;33(1):25–41. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00041-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES