Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology
. 2011 Jun 15;301(3):C550–C552. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00176.2011

Hypoxia. Cross talk between oxygen sensing and the cell cycle machinery

Gregg L Semenza 1,
PMCID: PMC3174572  PMID: 21677261

Abstract

A fundamental physiological property of mammalian cells is the regulation of proliferation according to O2 availability. Progression through the cell cycle is inhibited under hypoxic conditions in many, but not all, cell types, and this G1 arrest is dependent on hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1α. Components of the hexameric MCM helicase, which binds to replication origins before the onset of DNA synthesis, are present in large excess in mammalian cells relative to origins, suggesting that they may have additional functions. Screens for HIF-1α interacting proteins revealed that MCM7 binds to the amino-terminal PER-SIM-ARNT (PAS) domain of HIF-1α and stimulates prolyl hydroxylation-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of HIF-1α, whereas MCM3 binds to the carboxyl terminus of HIF-1α and enhances asparaginyl hydroxylation-dependent inhibition of HIF-1α transactivation domain function. Thus MCM proteins inhibit HIF activity via two distinct O2-dependent mechanisms. Under prolonged hypoxic conditions, MCM mRNA expression is inhibited in a HIF-1α-dependent manner. Thus HIF and MCM proteins act in a mutually antagonistic manner, providing a novel molecular mechanism for homeostatic regulation of cell proliferation based on the relative levels of these proteins.

Keywords: hypoxia-inducible factor, MCM proteins


as the preceding reviews in this thematic series on hypoxia have demonstrated, oxygen homeostasis impacts on many aspects of cellular and systemic physiology, including redox state; energy metabolism; cardiovascular, respiratory, and neuroendocrine function; and hematopoiesis (13, 16, 18, 21, 23, 24). Remarkably, many of the effects of hypoxia on physiological processes described in these reviews are mediated by the activity of the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). HIF-1 and HIF-2 are heterodimers composed of a constitutively expressed HIF-1β subunit and an O2-regulated HIF-1α or HIF-2α subunit, respectively (14, 19). O2-dependent hydroxylation of HIF-1α on proline residue 564 and/or 402 leads to the binding of the von Hippel-Lindau protein and recruitment of the Elongin C/Elongin B ubiquitin protein ligase that targets HIF-1α for proteasomal degradation, whereas hydroxylation on asparagine residue 803 blocks the interaction of HIF-1α with the coactivator protein p300, thereby inhibiting its transactivation function (11, 14, 19). The hydroxylation reactions utilize O2 as a substrate and under hypoxic conditions hydroxylation is inhibited, leading to increased HIF-1α and HIF-2α activity. HIFs mediate many, but not all, of their biological effects by binding to a cis-acting DNA sequence present in target genes, which is designated the hypoxia response element (HRE), and activating transcription (19).

A fundamental biological process that is regulated by O2 availability is cell division. For most cell types, hypoxia inhibits cell proliferation, because an increase in cell number would only further increase O2 consumption, resulting in even more severe hypoxia. On the other hand, certain specialized cell types are particularly likely to undergo mitosis under hypoxic conditions. For example, a key response to tissue hypoxia is angiogenesis, which requires the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells. These considerations suggest the existence of O2-dependent mechanisms to control cell proliferation as well as opposing mechanisms by which such controls may be overcome. This review will focus on studies that have identified cross talk between systems controlling O2 homeostasis and cell division.

When primary mouse cells (either embryonic fibroblasts or B lymphocytes) were cultured for 24 h under hypoxic conditions of 0.5% O2 (Po2 = 3.5 mmHg), bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation into DNA (a measure of progression through S phase of the cell cycle) was significantly decreased compared with duplicate plates of cells incubated under standard tissue culture conditions of 20% O2 (4). The effect of hypoxia was observed in both wild-type and p53-deficient cells. In contrast, BrdU incorporation was not inhibited when HIF-1α-deficient fibroblasts or B cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions (4). These results were consistent with previous studies demonstrating reduced BrdU incorporation when wild-type, but not HIF-1α-deficient, mouse embryonic stem cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions (1). Both studies reported that expression of mRNA encoding the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21 was increased in response to hypoxia in wild-type, but not in HIF-1α-deficient, cells (1, 4).

Overexpression of HIF-1α was sufficient to increase p21 expression and block BrdU incorporation in human HCT116 cells cultured under nonhypoxic conditions, even when HIF-1α was mutated to inhibit DNA binding or transactivation function or when amino acid residues 401–826 of HIF-1α were deleted (12). C-Myc is known to promote cell proliferation and one mechanism by which it does so is to repress transcription of the CDKN1A gene (which encodes p21) by interacting with MIZ1 bound to the initiator element in the CDKN1A promoter (7, 20). Analysis of CDKN1A promoter occupancy by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed binding of C-Myc, but not HIF-1α, in cells cultured under nonhypoxic conditions, whereas under hypoxic conditions C-Myc binding was decreased and HIF-1α binding was detected (12). C-Myc was shown to interact with the amino-terminal half of HIF-1α, which was proposed to displace C-Myc binding at the CDKN1A promoter, resulting in derepression of CDKN1A gene transcription (12). Whereas HIF-1α usually activates transcription by dimerizing with HIF-1β and binding to a hypoxia response element (HRE) (19), its effect on CDKN1A transcription is independent of HIF-1β and HRE binding. Forced overexpression of HIF-1α is sufficient to arrest the cell cycle even under nonhypoxic conditions (6).

Whereas HIF-1α inhibits C-Myc-mediated transcriptional repression of CDKN1A, HIF-2α has been reported to enhance C-Myc activity by promoting C-Myc:MAX heterodimerization, thereby promoting the transcription of C-Myc target genes encoding Cyclin D2 and other proteins required for cell division (5). In contrast, HIF-1 binds to an HRE in the MXI1 gene and activates its transcription, leading to the expression of an inhibitory subunit that competes with MAX for binding to C-Myc (2, 25). Because HIF-1α and HIF-2α are playing distinct roles, it is not clear whether the pro-proliferative effects of HIF-2α can necessarily overcome the anti-proliferative effects of HIF-1α.

Cyclin D2 and p21 are positive and negative regulators of CDKs, the activity of which is required for the transition from G1 to S phase. However, before the onset of DNA replication, prereplicative complexes assemble at origins of replication during G1. A principal component of the prereplicative complex is the MCM helicase, which is composed of six protein subunits that are designated MCM2–7. Loading of the MCM helicase onto an origin is referred to as replication licensing (17). The MCM proteins are present in 10- to-100-fold excess relative to origins, and the majority do not colocalize with sites of DNA synthesis, suggesting that they may have other functions (3). Screening for proteins that interact with the amino- and carboxy-terminal halves of HIF-1α identified MCM7 and MCM3, respectively (9). MCM7 enhanced the O2-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of HIF-1α by stabilizing HIF-1α-VHL-Elongin C complex formation, which was dependent on prolyl hydroxylation (Fig. 1). In contrast, MCM3 inhibited HIF-1α transactivation by a mechanism that was dependent on asparaginyl hydroxylation. Both MCM3 and MCM7 also bound to HIF-2α and inhibited its activity (9). Analysis of other MCM subunits revealed that MCM2 and MCM5 also inhibited HIF activity, whereas MCM4 and MCM6 had no effect, indicating that individual MCM subunits, rather than the intact MCM helicase, were functioning as negative regulators of HIF activity (9). These results may provide a resolution to the “MCM paradox” regarding the vast excess of MCM proteins relative to replication origins (10) by providing a novel role for these proteins that is independent of their function as a DNA helicase.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Cross talk between MCM proteins and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α. Under conditions of normoxia and the presence of proliferative signals, MCM3 and MCM7 protein levels are high and HIF-1α is subjected to hydroxylation of prolyl (Pro-OH) and asparaginyl (Asn-OH) residues. MCM7 binds to the PER-SIM-ARNT (PAS) domain of HIF-1α and also interacts with both VHL and Elongin C. MCM7 stabilizes their interaction, thereby promoting the ubiquitination and degradation of prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1α. MCM3 binds to the inhibitory domain (ID) and inhibits HIF-1α transactivation domain (TAD) function in an asparaginyl hydroxylation-dependent manner. Under conditions of acute hypoxia, prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylation of HIF-1α are inhibited, which inactivates the mechanisms by which MCMs block HIF-1 activity. Under conditions of chronic hypoxia, MCM3 and MCM7 mRNA and protein expression are inhibited in a HIF-1-dependent manner, further reducing inhibition of HIF-1 activity by MCMs.

To determine whether alterations in the levels of MCM proteins affected HIF activity, we analyzed the effect of contact inhibition, which was first described in NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblasts four decades ago (8) and involves a decrease in MCM protein levels (22). Under hypoxic conditions, confluent (contact-inhibited) cells expressed higher levels of HIF-1α protein and transactivation function compared with nonconfluent (noncontact-inhibited) cells (9). Similarly, when quiescent serum-starved HCT116 cells were stimulated to re-enter the cell cycle by serum repletion, HIF transcriptional activity declined in a MCM-dependent manner.

Remarkably, exposure of cells to prolonged hypoxia led to decreased MCM mRNA expression in a HIF-dependent manner, indicating that MCMs and HIFs function in a mutually antagonistic manner (9, 15). Taken together, these results have revealed the existence of a novel homeostatic mechanism to regulate cell cycle activity based on the balance between MCM and HIF proteins. Because inhibition of HIF activity by the MCMs occurs via O2-dependent hydroxylation, the ability of HIF-1α to inhibit cell cycle progression under conditions of severe hypoxia may be dominant over the ability of MCMs to promote cell cycle progression by inhibiting HIF-1α, since hydroxylation is inhibited under conditions of severe hypoxia (11).

GRANTS

Work in the author's laboratory is supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health (Grant U54-CA143868 and contract HHS-N268201000032C) and the Johns Hopkins Institute for Cell Engineering. G. L. Semenza is the C. Michael Armstrong Professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Carmeliet P, Dor Y, Herbert JM, Fukumura D, Brusselmans K, Dewerchin M, Neeman M, Bono F, Abramovitch R, Maxwell P, Koch CJ, Ratcliffe P, Moons L, Jain RK, Collen D, Keshert E. Role of HIF-1α in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. Nature 394: 485–490, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Corn PG, Ricci MS, Scata KA, Arsham AM, Simon MC, Dicker DT, El-Deiry WS. Mxi1 is induced by hypoxia in a HIF-1-dependent manner and protects cells from c-Myc-induced apoptosis. Cancer Biol Ther 4: 1285–1294, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 109–131, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goda N, Ryan HE, Khadivi B, McNulty W, Rickert RC, Johnson RS. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α is essential for cell cycle arrest during hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol 23: 359–369, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gordan JD, Bertout JA, Hu CJ, Diehl JA, Simon MC. HIF-2α promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell 11: 335–347, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hackenbeck T, Knaup KX, Schietke R, Schödel J, Willam C, Wu X, Warnecke C, Eckardt KU, Wiesener MS. HIF-1 or HIF-2 induction is sufficient to achieve cell cycle arrest in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts independent from hypoxia. Cell Cycle 8: 1386–1395, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Herold S, Wanzel M, Beuger V, Frohme C, Beul D, Hillukkala T, Syvaoja J, Saluz HP, Haenel F, Eilers M. Negative regulation of the mammalian UV response by Myc through association with Miz-1. Mol Cell 10: 509–521, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Holley RW, Kiernan RJ. Contact inhibition of cell division in 3T3 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 60: 300–304, 1968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hubbi ME, Luo W, Baek JH, Semenza GL. MCM proteins are negative regulators of hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell 42: 700–712, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hyrien O, Marheineke K, Goldar A. Paradoxes of eukaryotic DNA replication: MCM proteins and the random completion problem. Bioessays 25: 116–125, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaelin WG, Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell 30: 393–402, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koshiji M, Kageyama Y, Pete EA, Horikawa I, Barrett JC, Huang LE. HIF-1α induces cell cycle arrest by functionally counteracting Myc. EMBO J 23: 1949–1956, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kumar GK. Hypoxia. 3. Hypoxia and neurotransmitter synthesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C743–C751, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Majmundar AJ, Wong WJ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol Cell 40: 294–309, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manalo DJ, Rowan A, Lavoie T, Natarajan L, Kelly BD, Ye SQ, Garcia JG, Semenza GL. Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial cell responses to hypoxia by HIF-1. Blood 105: 659–669, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miyata T, Takizawa S, van Ypersele de Strihou C. Hypoxia. 1. Intracellular sensors for oxygen and oxidative stress: novel therapeutic targets. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C226–C2231, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sclafani RA, Holzen TM. Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication. Annu Rev Genet 41: 237–280, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Semenza GL. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology theme: Hypoxia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C225, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Semenza GL. Oxygen homeostasis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2: 336–361, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seoane J, Le HV, Massagué J. Myc suppression of the p21(Cip1) Cdk inhibitor influences the outcome of the p53 response to DNA damage. Nature 419: 729–734, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shimoda LA, Polak J. Hypoxia. 4. Hypoxia and ion channel function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C951–C967, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stoeber K, Tlsty TD, Happerfield L, Thomas GA, Romanov S, Bobrow L, Williams ED, Williams GH. DNA replication licensing and human cell proliferation. J Cell Sci 114: 2027–2041, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wheaton WW, Chandel NS. Hypoxia. 2. Hypoxia regulates cellular metabolism. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C385–C393, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoon D, Ponka P, Prchal JT. Hypoxia. 5. Hypoxia and hematopoiesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C1215–C1222, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang H, Gao P, Fukuda R, Kumar G, Krishnamachary B, Zeller KI, Dang CV, Semenza GL. HIF-1 inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis and cellular respiration in VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma by repression of C-MYC activity. Cancer Cell 11: 407–420, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES