Skip to main content
SQU Journal for Scientific Research - Medical Sciences logoLink to SQU Journal for Scientific Research - Medical Sciences
. 2001 Oct;3(2):81–85.

Exaggerated blood pressure reactivity in the offspring of first-cousin hypertensive parents

Amal M Ziada 1,*, Waheed Al Kharusi 1, Mohammed O Hassan 1
PMCID: PMC3174706  PMID: 24019713

Abstract

Objective:

To study blood pressure and blood pressure reactivity in young offspring of normotensive or hypertensive parents who are consanguineous (first cousins) or are not blood-related.

Method:

Blood pressure, heart rate and body mass index (BMI) were measured in 9–10 year-old male offspring of 19 pairs of first-cousins normotensive, 16 pairs of first-cousin hypertensive and 12 pairs of non-blood-related hypertensive parents.

Results:

The offspring of first-cousin hypertensive parents exhibited the greatest systolic and diastolic blood pressure reactivity to their first casual blood pressure measurement, while the offspring of first-cousin normotensive parents showed the least reactivity. The offspring of the hypertensive parents who were not blood-related showed an intermediate reactivity. Basal systolic blood pressure (SBP) was also highest in the offspring of first-cousin hypertensive parents, and their basal diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was higher than that in offspring of first-cousin normotensive parents.

Conclusion:

The augmented blood pressure response in the offspring of hypertensive parents may have prognostic implications and serve as an important and significant indicator of predisposition to hypertension later in life.

Keywords: consanguineous marriage, offspring, blood pressure reactivity, Oman


Genetic influence on the variability of blood pressure (BP) in populations has been well established.13 This effect has been repeatedly demonstrated by strong evidence of familial aggregation of BP.39 Significant correlations exist between offspring’s and parent’s blood pressure, and more so between twins.1012 This familial influence on BP can be detected from early childhood and tends to track over the years increasing in magnitude as the child progresses towards adolescence.4,5,13 Children of hypertensive parents have higher average systolic and diastolic BP than children of normotensive parents, and are about 3.8 times more likely to have high BP before the age of 55.1,14 Research indicates that essential hypertension has origins in childhood.15 Tracking studies have shown that children and adolescents with elevated BP, though not necessarily in the hypertensive range, may be at increased risk for developing hypertension later in life.1619 It is therefore useful to identify such familial predisposition in the offspring of parents with high blood pressure.

Cardiovascular reactivity is defined as the change in BP, heart rate, or other haemodynamic parameters in response to physical or mental stimuli.20 Exaggerated BP reactivity has been observed in patients with hypertension compared to normotensive subjects and has also been described in young people, usually in connection with risk factors of hypertension.2024 Such studies demonstrate that BP reactivity to laboratory stressors tends to aggregate in families.2527 Hypertensive and pre-hypertensive subjects with positive family histories of hypertension show greater BP reactivity to mental and physical stressors than do subjects with no family history and a matching basal BP.1 Such excessive responses of BP to stress may be a risk factor for the development of hypertension and other cardiovascular morbidities.24,28,29

Among the various methods to measure BP reactivity is a simple one that takes advantage of the ‘white coat effect’, the exaggerated BP response that many people exhibit when examined in a clinical setting. The difference between an individual’s ‘clinic BP’ and the his ‘daytime average 24-hour BP’ can be used to quantify his BP reactivity due to the white coat effect.30,31 In our study, we investigated whether familial similarity could be detected via casual BP estimations in the offspring of consanguineous marriage of hypertensive parents—a unique sample from the population that runs the highest risk of developing hypertension, and therefore in our opinion may provide a better approximation of the extent to which familial aggregation of BP can be expressed than all models studied before. This excellent opportunity was rendered possible by a strong cultural disposition in the Arab Gulf region towards consanguineous marriages. In Oman, a 1995 survey estimated that first-cousin marriages under the age of 50 years formed 34% of the total marriages.32

METHOD

The participants were 135 schoolboys aged 9–10 years who were taking part in a summer sports camp in the city of Muscat. After obtaining parental consent to the study, a screening examination was conducted within the offices of the sports complex by a qualified cardiovascular technician who did not wear a white coat. The SBP, DBP, and heart rate were recorded from the left arm, for the first time ever in those children, using an automated device (PROPAQ, 102: Protocol Systems Inc, OR, USA). One measurement was taken after 10 minutes of supine rest, and another after 30 minutes. For each measurement the mean of two readings were calculated, however, if the first two readings differed by 3 mm Hg or more, a third reading was taken and the mean of the three was used. BP reactivity was taken as the difference between the first (10 min) and the second (30 min) readings. Body mass index (BMI; kg.m−2) was calculated.

After all examinations were completed, each participant carried home a short simplified questionnaire on his parents’ blood relationships, and whether one or both were on antihypertensive treatment. Pairs were then divided into first-cousin parents and parents who were not blood-related. Forty one pairs were first-cousin parents, 6 pairs of whom did not report for BP measurement, and were excluded from the study. Thirteen first-cousin parents were already on antihypertensive medication, and 3 were newly diagnosed with a SBP≥145 and/or a DBP≥95 mmHg on two separate visits each, as confirmed later by an independent physician at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. The occurrence of hypertension varied among the 16 first-cousin hypertensive parents: in 4 pairs both parents, in 2 pairs the mothers only, and in 10 pairs the fathers only were hypertensive. The normotensive group among the first-cousin parents comprised 19 pairs, and both parents had a SBP≤130 and DBP≤80 mm Hg. The incidence of hypertension also varied in the parent pairs who were not consanguineous: In 2 pairs both parents were hypertensive; in 8 pairs only the father and in 2, only the mother were hypertensive. In the non-consanguineous cohort all hypertensives were already on antihypertensive medication.

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

The children were divided into three groups. The low risk (LR) group consisted of the offspring of first-cousin normotensive parents, the medium risk (MR) group comprised the offspring of one or two non-consanguineous hypertensive parents, and in the high risk (HR) group were the offspring of one or two first-cousin-related hypertensive parents. Mean first and second SBP and DBP and heart rate values of HR children were compared to the corresponding values of the MR and LR children.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 7.5 for Windows. To determine significance of the difference between the three groups, the independent sample T-test with 95% confidence interval was used. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen parent pairs (86%) responded to the questionnaire. The mean age of the fathers was 42 years (range 29–47) which was significantly higher than that of the mothers (33, range 25–37), p<0.05. The main findings in the offspring are shown in table 1. There was no significant difference between the the BMI of the three groups of children. The HR children exhibited the highest first SBP compared to the MR and LR children (p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively). The second SBP reading was also significantly higher in the HR children than in the MR and the LR groups (p<0.05 for both). Similarly the first DBP readings were significantly higher in the HR and MR than the LR groups (p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively) with no significant difference between the HR and MR groups. The second DBP reading was also significantly higher in the HR and MR groups compared to the LR group (p <0.05 for both) with no significant difference between the readings in the HR and MR groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in the first and second heart rate estimations.

Table 1.

Blood pressure, body mass index and heart rate of the three study groups

Parents Normotensive first-cousins Hypertensive, Not blood-related Hypertensive first cousins

Risk level Low Medium High

N 19 12 16
Body mass index (Kg/m2) 16 (0.4) 15.8 (0.7) 17.3 (1.1)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
a) 10 minutes 108 (1) [112 (1.3)*]* 117 (1.8)**]*
b) 30 minutes 98 (0.8) [99 (1.0)] [102 (2.5)*]*
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
a) 10 minutes 64 (1.6) 71 (0.9)* 75 (1.6)*
b) 30 minutes 60 (0.6) 68 (0.9)* 65 (1.4)*
Heart rate (beats/minute)
a) 10 minutes 81 (1.5) 86 (1.7) 86 (2.5)
b) 30 minutes 73 (1.6) 79 (1.3) 77 (1.5)

The values are means ±SE in parantheses); LR – Low risk; HR – High risk; MR – Medium risk; N – Number of pairs.

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

( )* – comparing HR to LR;

[ ]* comparing HR to MR

Figure 1 summarizes the SBP and DBP reactivity in the three groups. The HR group exhibited the highest SBP and DBP reactivity (p<0.01 and p<0.001 respectively) the MR group an intermediate reactivity (p<0.01 and p 0.05 respectively) while the LR group showed the least response with a slight but significant SBP reactivity (p<0.05) and non-significant DBP reactivity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Blood pressure reactivity in children in the three risk categories

DISCUSSION

All the subjects were of the same sex, similar BMI and age group, thereby eliminating the possible interaction of such factors. Our results show that a family history of hypertension did predict both the differential BP and BP reactivity in these children in accordance with the three group designations. HR children showed the greatest systolic and diastolic BP reactivity, MR children occupied an intermediate position, and the LR showed the least reactivity. These results are in agreement with other studies in which even milder levels of hypertensive heredity have revealed inclinations towards higher systolic and/or diastolic BP as well as higher BP reactivity to mental stress.26,3438 We can only speculate on the mechanism responsible for this variation between groups. Some studies have proposed that the exaggerated cardiovascular responses to stress are provoked by a differential sensitivity of adrenergic receptors and sympathetic overactivity.39,40 Enhanced sympathetic activity may occur because of increased sympathetic stimulation and/or attenuated sympathoinhibition.41 Overactivity starts in childhood and is easily evident in 30% of patients with incipient hypertension.40 It is possible that there is a genetic component in sympathetic overactivity expressed with more vigour in high risk individuals. Although environmental factors do have a role in the development of high BP in humans, 50–79% of BP variations are attributed to genetic factors, and even this would probably be an underestimation in our and other similar populations.2,3,12 The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Oman places many of its children in the high risk group. Attention should therefore be drawn towards a probable high level of hypertension in this population.

One potential weakness of this study is that it is a deductive one that compares the BP of the offspring of hypertensive and normotensive parents and not to the parents’ actual BP values. Although most studies on the heritability of BP were based on estimations of casual BP readings, it is now accepted that 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring is a superior clinical tool in predicting the basal BP since it may be less affected by artefacts such as the white coat effect.30,34,42 Even though our technician did not wear a white coat, the children in our study were going through the experience for the first time in their lives, that too in a formal (office) setting, which could have elicited stress comparable to the white coat effect.43 With this assumption we recorded the first round of BP measurement, after giving each child 10 minutes of rest. The 30-minute gap before the second BP measurement was to allow the child’s BP to settle to its basal level. We acknowledge that this setting was suboptimal for estimating basal BP, and cannot confirm that the casual reading after 30 minutes is a ‘true’ representative of basal levels: it still might have been confounded with the white coat effect. However, the setting was consistent for both the measurements and in all groups of children. Moreover it has been shown that the artefact inherent in both casual BP and basal readings is heritable and appears to aggregate in first-degree relatives.42

CONCLUSION

The augmented BP reactivity found in the offspring of hypertensive parents might have prognostic implications and serve as an important early sign of familial predisposition to hypertension. Our findings emphasise the need for special follow up of children with family histories of hypertension, and for a national educational programme on the genetic risks of consanguineous marriages.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Sultan Qaboos University internal grant system # ig/med/phys/00/01.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hamet P, Pausova Z, Adarichev V, Adarichev K, Tremblay J. Hypertension: genes and environment. J Hypertens. 1998;16:397–418. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816040-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bouchard TJ, Lykken DT, Mcgue M, Segal NL, Tellegen A. Sources of human physiological difference: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science. 1990;250:223–8. doi: 10.1126/science.2218526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hong Y, de Faire U, Heller DA, McClearn GE, Pederson N. Genetic and environmental influences on blood pressure in elderly twins. Hypertension. 1994;24:663–70. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.24.6.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wilson DK, Klesges LM, Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hackett-Renner CA, Alpert BS, Dalton ET. A prospective study of familial aggregation of blood pressure in young children. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:959–69. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90112-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Hooft IM, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, Valkenburg HA. Change in blood pressure in offspring of parents with high or low blood pressure: the Dutch Hypertension and Offspring Study. J Hypertens Suppl. 1988;6:S594–6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198812040-00186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fossali E, Ruzza ML, Codega C, Di Francesco C, Iurato M, Migliaccio MC, et al. Familial aggregation of blood pressure in a paediatric population. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1990;79:1213–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brandao AP, Brandao AA, Araujo EM, Oliveira RC. Familial aggregation of arterial blood pressure and possible genetic influence. Hypertension. 1992;19:11214–7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.2_suppl.ii214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fuentes RM, Notkola IL, Shemeikka S, Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A. Familial aggregation of blood pressure: a population-based family study in eastern Finland. J Hum Hypertens. 2000;14:441–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang X, Wang B, Chen C, Yang J, Fang Z, Zuckerman B, et al. Familial aggregation of blood pressure in rural Chinese community. Amm J Epidemiol. 1999;149:412–20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stamler R, Stamler J, Reidlinger W, Algera G, Roberts R. Familial parental history and prevalence of hypertension. JAMA. 1979;241:43–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Havlik RJ, Garrison RJ, Feinleib M, Kannel WB, Castelli WP, McNamara PM. Blood pressure aggregation in families. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:304–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hunt SC, Hasstedt SJ, Kuida H, Stults BM, Hopkins PN, William RR. Genetic heritability and common environmental components of resting and stressed blood pressure, lipids, and body mass index in Utah pedigrees and twins. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:625–38. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Michels VV, Bergstralh EJ, Hoverman VR, O’Fallon WM, Weidman WH. Tracking and prediction of blood pressure in children. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987;62:875–81. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Curro V, De Luca F, Guisti D, Bracaglia G, Buffetti A, Pelargonio S, et al. Correlations between blood pressure values, familial hypertension and anthropometric parameters in a sample of 3-year-old children. Pediatr Med Chir. 1988;10:273–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bao W, Threefoot SA, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Essential hypertension predicted by tracking of elevated blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:657–65. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00116-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lauer RM, Clarke WR, Mahoney LT, Witt J. Childhood predictors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40:23–40. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38478-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kotchen JM, Kotchen TA, Guthrie GP, Jr, Cottrill C, Kean HE. Correlates of adolescent blood pressure at five–year follow-up. Hypertension. 1980;2:124–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Lauer RM. Changes in ponderosity and blood pressure in childhood: the Muscatine Study. AM J Epidemiol. 1986;124:195–206. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lauer RM, Clarke WR. Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Paediatrics. 1989;84:633–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Falkner B. The role of cardiovascular reactivity as a mediator of hypertension in African Americans. Semin Nephrol. 1996;16:117–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schulte W, Neus H, von Eiff AW. Blood pressure reactivity to emotional stress in uncomplicated forms of hypertension. Klin Wochenschr. 1981;16:1243–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01747756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saab PG, Llabre MM, Ma M, DiLillo V, McCalla JR, Fernander-Scott A, et al. Cardiovascular reactivity to stress in adolescents with and without persistently elevated blood pressure. J Hypertens. 2001;19:21–7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200101000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matthews KA, Woodall KL, Allen MT. Cardiovascular reactivity to stress predicts future blood pressure status. Hypertension. 1993;22:479–85. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.22.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Falkner B. Blood pressure response to mental stress. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:621–3. doi: 10.1093/ajh/4.11s.621s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matthews KA, Manuck SB, Stoney CM, Rakaczky CJ, McCann BS, Saab PG, et al. Familial aggregation of blood pressure and heart rate responses during behavioral stress. Psychosom Med. 1988;50:341–52. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198807000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cavalcante JW, Cavalcante LP, Pacheco WS, de Menezes MG, Gama Filho CG. Blood pressure responses in children of normotensive and of hypertensive parents treated with pressor stimulus. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1997;69:323–6. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x1997001100006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Al’ Absi M, Everson SA, Lovallo WR. Hypertension risk factors and cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress in young men. Int J Psychophysiol. 1995;20:155–60. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krantz DS, Manuk SB. Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: a review and methodological critique. Psychol Bull. 1984;96:435–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matthews KA, Weiss SM, Detre T, DemBroski TM, Falkner B, Manuk SB, et al. Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986. p. 527. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pickering TG, James GD. Some implications of the differences between home, clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Hypertens Suppl. 1989;7:65–72S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Boldrini F, Guerrieri M, Gatteschi C, Benemio G, et al. Risk stratification of left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension using non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:583–90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90485-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sulaiman AJ, Al Riyami A, Farid S. Oman Family Health Survey. Ministry of Health; Muscat: 1995. pp. 45–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koch VH, Colli A, Saito MI, Furusawa EA, Ignes E, Okay Y, et al. Comparison between casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters in healthy and hypertensive adolescents. Blood Press Monit. 2000;5:281–9. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200010000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lemne CE. Increased blood pressure reactivity in children of borderline hypertensive fathers. J hypertens. 1998;16:1243–8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816090-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Marrero AF, al’Absi M, Pincomb GA, Lovallo WR. Men at risk for hypertension show elevated vascular resistance at rest and during mental stress. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997;25:185–92. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00737-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.al’Absi M, Everson SA, Lovallo WR. Hypertension risk factors and cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress in young men. Int J Psychophysiol. 1995;20:155–60. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Manuk SB, Prolefrone JM, Terrell DF, Muldoon MF, Kasprowicz AL, Waldstein SR, et al. Absence of enhanced sympathoadrenal activity and behaviorally evoked cardiovascular reactivity among offspring of hypertensives. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:248–55. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nystrom F, Aardal E, Ohman KP. A population-based study of the white-coat blood pressure effect: positive correlation with plasma cortisol. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1998;20:95–104. doi: 10.3109/10641969809053209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Champlin J, Petrovich M, Gonzalez M, Lebeau R, Nadeau R. Abnormal cardiac reactivity in borderline and mild essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;17:22–8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.17.4_suppl.iii22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mills PJ, Dimsdale JE, Nelesen RA, Jasiewicz J, Zeigler MG, Kennedy B. Patterns of adrenergic receptors and adrenergic agonists underlying cardiovascular responses to a psychological challenge. Psychosom Med. 1994;56:70–6. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199401000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Julius S. The evidence for a pathophysiologic significance of the sympathetic overactivity in hypertension. Cin Exp Hypertens. 1996;18:305–21. doi: 10.3109/10641969609088965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jamerson KA, Schork N, Julius S. Effect of home blood pressure and gender on estimates of the familial aggregation of blood pressure. The Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study. Hypertension. 1992;20:314–8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.20.3.314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lantelme P, Milton H, Buttard P, Fortrat JO, Gayet C, Gharib C. Reactivity of “white coat” type is associated with reactivity to mental stress. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997;90:1093–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal for scientific research. Medical sciences / Sultan Qaboos University are provided here courtesy of Sultan Qaboos University

RESOURCES