Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochimie. 2011 Jun 1;93(11):1993–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.05.029

Bifunctional transfer-messenger RNA

Kenneth C Keiler 1,, Nitya S Ramadoss 1
PMCID: PMC3175250  NIHMSID: NIHMS300633  PMID: 21664408

Abstract

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) is a bifunctional RNA that has properties of a tRNA and an mRNA. tmRNA uses these two functions to release ribosomes stalled during translation and target the nascent polypeptides for degradation. This concerted reaction, known as trans-translation, contributes to translational quality control and regulation of gene expression in bacteria. tmRNA is conserved throughout bacteria, and is one of the most abundant RNAs in the cell, suggesting that trans-translation is of fundamental importance for bacterial fitness. Mutants lacking tmRNA activity typically have severe phenotypes, including defects in viability, virulence, and responses to environmental stresses.

tmRNA

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), also called 10Sa or SsrA RNA, is unique among bifunctional RNAs in that it has properties of a tRNA and an mRNA. The ends of tmRNA fold into a structure resembling tRNA(Ala). However, tmRNA is significantly larger than a tRNA, and in place of the anticodon loop there are multiple pseudoknots and a specialized open reading frame. This unusual structure allows tmRNA to interact with specific ribosomes in a reaction known as trans-translation. During trans-translation, tmRNA performs functions of both a tRNA and a message to induce the ribosome to add a peptide tag to the C terminus of the nascent polypeptide. This reaction targets the nascent polypeptide for degradation and releases the ribosome. Although the physiological role of trans-translation is still under investigation, tmRNA has been found in every bacterial genome sequence and is one of the most abundant RNAs in the cell, suggesting that it confers a strong evolutionary advantage in all environments that support bacterial life.

tmRNA structure – tRNA with a message

The 5’ and 3’ ends of tmRNA fold into a structure containing an acceptor stem and a TΨC arm (Fig. 1). The acceptor stem contains a G:U wobble base pair, which allows it to be recognized by alanyl-tRNA synthetase and charged with alanine [1-3]. The tRNA-like domain is bound by two proteins that are essential for trans-translation activity: SmpB, a dedicated component of the trans-translation system, and EF-Tu, which is important for functional interactions with the ribosome [4-6].

Figure 1. Structure of tmRNA.

Figure 1

(A) Model of the secondary structure of tmRNA based on base pair covariation and chemical probing data. The tRNA-like domain, tag reading frame (green), and pseudoknots (PK) are indicated. The G:U base pair required for alanylation of tmRNA is shaded. (B) Atomic model of the tmRNA-SmpB complex during trans-translation (PDB file 3IYR) [23]. tmRNA (blue) and SmpB (purple) combine to mimic a tRNA and an mRNA.

The tag reading frame encodes a short peptide and is contained within an extended (>250 nt) sequence that includes 2-4 pseudoknots, depending on the species [7, 8]. Although this sequence is translated during trans-translation, it lacks a canonical start codon and there is no indication that ribosomes can initiate translation on the tag reading frame. Therefore, it is not a true open reading frame. Annotated tag reading frames range in length from 8-35 codons, and terminate in a stop codon [8]. However, the tag reading frame can be shortened to one codon or extended to encode complete proteins without disrupting trans-translation activity. The role of the pseudoknots in this region is unclear. E. coli tmRNA is still functional if any of the pseudoknots is replaced, so none of these elements is essential for activity [9, 10]. However, the evolutionary conservation of the pseudoknots, particularly PK1, suggests that they have a role in vivo.

trans-Translation – a concerted reaction for bifunctional RNA

Unlike other bifunctional RNAs described in this issue, which can use their different functions independently, the tRNA–like and mRNA-like functions of tmRNA are used in a single, concerted reaction (Fig. 2) [11]. tmRNA, charged with alanine and bound to SmpB and EF-Tu, can enter the A site of substrate ribosomes acting like a tRNA. Cryo-electron microscopy studies and chemical probing experiments indicate that the tRNA-like domain of tmRNA is located at the peptidyl transfer center, with SmpB in the position normally occupied by anticodon loop of a tRNA [12, 13]. The nascent polypeptide is then transpeptidated to alanyl-tmRNA, and the tmRNA-SmpB complex is translocated to the ribosomal P site. At a still undefined point in this process, the mRNA that was being translated is released from the ribosome, and the tag reading frame of tmRNA is inserted into the decoding center. Translation resumes using the tag reading frame as a message, so during decoding of the first codon of the tag reading frame tmRNA is simultaneously mimicking both a tRNA and an mRNA. Translation termination at a stop codon at the end of the tag reading frame completes trans-translation by releasing the tagged protein and the ribosome [11]. The tmRNA-encoded peptide tag is recognized by several intracellular proteases, ensuring that the tagged protein is rapidly degraded [11, 14-16].

Fig. 2. Model of trans-translation.

Fig. 2

During trans-translation, tmRNA, bound to SmpB (purple square) and EF-Tu (not shown) and charged with alanine (orange square), enters the A site of a stalled translation complex and accepts the nascent polypeptide in a transpeptidation reaction. The mRNA (blue) is released and degraded, and translation resumes on the tmRNA tag reading frame (green). Translation terminates at the tag reading frame stop codon, which is recognized by a release factor (red rectangle), releases the ribosomal subunits and the tagged protein. The tmRNA-encoded peptide tag (green squares) targets the protein for proteolysis.

The tRNA-mimicking functions during trans-translation are accomplished by a 1:1 complex of tmRNA and SmpB [4, 12, 17]. SmpB is an essential component of the trans-translation machinery, and like tmRNA, SmpB has been found in all bacterial genome sequences [4, 8]. In addition to its role as a structural mimic of a tRNA anticodon loop within the ribosome, SmpB is important for the stability of tmRNA in vivo, and makes specific contacts with alanyl-tRNA synthetase to enhance the rate of aminoacylation of tmRNA [18, 19].

The mRNA-mimicking functions of tmRNA seem straightforward, but tmRNA faces two challenges not encountered by typical mRNAs. First, tmRNA does not have a start codon or canonical initiation sequences, and translation will not initiate on the tag reading frame. Instead, during trans-translation the tmRNA-SmpB complex directs translation to resume at a specific codon at the beginning of the tag reading frame. Correct recognition of this “resume codon” by the ribosome involves residues immediately upstream of the translated sequence, as well as SmpB [20-22]. The second challenge for the mRNA-like function of tmRNA is to thread the tag reading frame through the mRNA channel despite the significant secondary structure and surrounding pseudoknots. Despite the apparent structural constraints imposed by the pseudoknots, biochemical and cryo-EM studies have suggested that the pseudoknots can remain intact when the tag reading frame is in the mRNA channel [23-25].

Physiology of trans-translation

trans-Translation occurs frequently in growing cells. Estimates of tagging frequency in E. coli suggest that about 0.4% of translation reactions end in trans-translation [26]. This rate corresponds to approximately one trans-translation reaction per ribosome per cell cycle. There appear to be two distinct roles for trans-translation: translational quality control, and gene regulation. When translational complexes stall due to mRNA damage or other problems completing translation, trans-translation is used to remove all components of the problematic complex: the stalled ribosome is released at the tag reading frame stop codon, the nascent polypeptide is targeted for proteolysis by the tmRNA-encoded tag, and the mRNA is removed from the ribosome and degraded. In other cases, translation complexes are intentionally targeted to tmRNA during expression of specific genes, and trans-translation serves to control the amount of protein that is produced.

Both translational quality control and gene regulation by trans-translation depend on the selectivity of tmRNA for stalled translation complexes. In vitro, tmRNA-SmpB interacts efficiently with ribosomes that are at or near the 3’ end of an mRNA, but trans-translation is blocked if the mRNA extends past the leading edge of the ribosome [27]. Likewise, most if not all substrates for trans-translation in vivo result from ribosomes that are stalled near the 3’ end of the mRNA [28, 29]. How tmRNA recognizes these stalled complexes is not yet known, but it has been proposed that either mRNA extending past the leading edge of the ribosome sterically blocks tmRNA entry into the ribosome, or that the ribosome changes conformation when it reaches the end of the mRNA and tmRNA recognizes the altered conformation [29]. Experiments in E. coli demonstrated that trans-translation does not compete with translation elongation, confirming that tmRNA only acts on selected translation complexes in vivo [26].

Why would a ribosome translate to the 3’ end of an mRNA without terminating? Part of the answer is that in bacteria ribosomes may frequently initiate translation on truncated mRNAs. Eukaryotes have several mechanisms to ensure an mRNA is complete before a ribosome initiates translation, including nuclear export controls and recognition of the poly(A) tail by translation initiation factors [30]. However, in bacteria translation can initiate before transcription is complete, so there is no opportunity to proofread the mRNA or insure that it has a correct 3’ end. If RNA polymerase terminates before the stop codon is transcribed, the mRNA will have no translation termination signal. When truncated mRNAs are produced intentionally by inserting a transcriptional terminator before the stop codon, trans-translation acts efficiently on the resulting translation complexes [11]. Likewise, if the mRNA is truncated by physical or chemical damage, or by nucleolytic degradation, the stop codon can be removed. For example, the endotoxin protein RelE cuts mRNAs within the ribosome, causing trans-translation [31, 32]. DNA damage can also lead to premature transcription termination. In E. coli, tmRNA mutants are hypersensitive to 5-azacytidine, a crosslinking agent that blocks transcription, suggesting that tmRNA aids in elimination of stalled translation complexes at these sites [33]. Ribosomes can also reach the end of an intact mRNA due to readthrough of the stop codon, and both suppressor tRNAs and antibiotics that promote miscoding and frameshifting increase the amount of trans-translation [34, 35].

Ribosomes stalled in the middle of an mRNA can also be targeted for trans-translation if the 3’ portion of the mRNA is degraded. Stalling due to scarcity of a cognate tRNA or release factor, or due to an inefficient translation termination sequence, leads to truncation of the mRNA [36-42]. In at least some cases, the truncation is due to degradation of the mRNA by RNase II exonuclease, which appears to facilitate cleavage of the mRNA in the ribosomal A site by a second ribonuclease activity [43]. Other stalled ribosomes, such as those engaged in attenuation or secretion control, are protected from tmRNA activity [44]. Problems with nascent polypeptide folding can also target the translation complex to tmRNA [45]. Although some of the mechanisms for promoting trans-translation remain to be elucidated, it appears that the majority of tmRNA activity is used to remove problematic translation complexes and target the incomplete nascent polypeptides for degradation.

tmRNA activity is also used to regulate expression of specific genes (Fig. 3). For example, in E. coli the ArfA protein appears to promote release of stalled ribosomes in a pathway that is partially redundant with tmRNA, and the expression of ArfA is controlled by tmRNA activity [46]. The arfA mRNA has an RNase III cleavage site before the stop codon, and the mRNA is present predominantly in a truncated form . When tmRNA is available, ArfA is tagged and proteolyzed, and there is little ArfA protein in the cell. However, when tmRNA is absent, a truncated but active ArfA protein is produced [46]. Presumably this mechanism allows ArfA to be produced exclusively when tmRNA becomes saturated and the cell requires more ribosome release activity. Consistent with this idea, deletion of the genes encoding ArfA and tmRNA is synthetically lethal in E. coli [47]. The recent discovery of this mechanism raises the possibility that other key proteins are regulated by tmRNA through specific RNase cleavage sites. Expression of other genes, such as kinA in some strains of B. subtilis, are controlled by tmRNA because the gene contains a transcriptional terminator 5’ of the first in-frame stop codon [48] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Regulation of gene expression by tmRNA.

Fig. 3

Three mechanisms for intentionally generating an mRNA with no stop codon are shown, and the fate of protein translated from these mRNAs in the presence and absence of tmRNA activity is indicated. arfA mRNA from E. coli is cleaved by RNase III, removing the in-frame stop codon (red hexagon) [46]. The kinA gene in some strains of Bacillus subtilis has a transcriptional terminator upstream of the first in-frame stop codon, so the kinA mRNA will not have a stop codon [48]. Binding of LacI (magenta ovals) protein to the O3 operator site blocks transcription of the 3’ end of the lacI gene, producing an mRNA with no stop codon [49]. In all three cases, tmRNA activity results in tagging and degradation of newly-synthesized protein, but in the absence of tmRNA activity a truncated but active variant of the protein will be released.

A second mechanism for regulating gene expression with tmRNA activity is through DNA binding proteins that block transcription elongation. In E. coli, when Lac repressor (LacI) accumulates to high concentrations it binds an auxiliary operator, O3, which overlaps the coding sequence of LacI. This binding blocks RNA polymerase and prevents the mRNA from being completed. tmRNA activity will target LacI made from these truncated mRNAs for proteolysis, preventing excess expression of lacI. E. coli mutants that lack tmRNA are slow to respond to signals that inactivate LacI, suggesting that excess LacI has accumulated [49]. Similarly, the CcpA protein in B. subtilis binds within the coding sequence of TreP, causing a transcriptional roadblock and promoting tmRNA activity on ribosomes producing new TreP [50]. Mutants that lack the bifunctional activity of tmRNA typically have severe phenotypes. trans-Translation activity is essential in Neisseria gonnorhoea, Shigella flexneri, Haemophilus influenzae, and species of Mycoplasma [51-54]. E. coli can survive without tmRNA as long as they retain the ArfA backup system, but mutants lacking tmRNA activity still have a variety of stress phenotypes [47]. tmRNA is also required for virulence in Salmonella enterica and Yersina pestis, and is required for cell cycle control in Caulobacter crescentus [55-57].

Regulation of tmRNA activity

tmRNA is abundant in growing cells, but it is further induced by stress conditions such as heat shock, cold shock, and biofilm formation [58-60]. More extensive regulation of tmRNA has been observed in C. crescentus, where the abundances of tmRNA and SmpB change as a function of the cell cycle [61]. tmRNA and SmpB levels increase in late G1 phase, and are rapidly removed from the cell after DNA replication initiates. tmRNA is stable in G1-phase cells, but is specifically degraded in early S phase by the exonuclease RNase R [62]. The ability to regulate tmRNA stability may be enhanced in C. crescentus by the structure of tmRNA. The gene encoding tmRNA in C. crescentus contains a circular permutation, resulting in a mature tmRNA that is composed of two RNA chains [63]. RNase R recognizes the non-tRNA-like 3’ end of tmRNA, so the two-piece construction of tmRNA is important for regulated degradation [62]. All α-proteobacteria, as well as at least two other bacterial lineages, also have circularly permuted tmRNA [64]. tmRNA and SmpB are also regulated by subcellular localization in C. crescentus. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunoflourescence data show that tmRNA and SmpB are localized in a helical pattern within the cell [65]. RNase R is localized in a non-overlapping pattern, suggesting that localization may be used in part to limit access of RNase R to tmRNA and prevent inappropriate degradation [65]. The role of localization in trans-translation activity is not yet clear.

Despite the conservation of tmRNA throughout bacteria and the requirement for trans-translation in a variety of bacterial systems, no bifunctional RNA similar to tmRNA has been found in the nuclear genome of a eukaryote. The requirement for translation quality control may be lower in eukaryotes due to availability of the mRNA proof-reading mechanisms described above. Nevertheless, a protein-based mechanism analogous to trans-translation has been identified in yeast. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, proteins translated from aberrant mRNA are ubiquitinated by a dedicated E3 ligase to induce degradation by the proteasome [66]. Therefore, eukaryotes may have evolved proteins to take the place of the bifunctional tmRNA.

Highlights.

  • Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) has properties of a tRNA and an mRNA.

  • These functions are used in trans-translationto release stalled ribosomes and target nascent polypeptides for degradation.

  • trans-translation contributes to translational quality control and regulation of gene expression.

  • tmRNA is conserved throughout bacteria, and is one of the most abundant RNAs in the cell

  • Mutants lacking tmRNA activity have severe phenotypes.

ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS

We thank Chris Hayes for communicating results before publication. Work by the authors is supported by NIH grant GM68720.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Komine Y, Kitabatake M, Yokogawa T, Nishikawa K, Inokuchi H. A tRNA-like structure is present in 10Sa RNA, a small stable RNA from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 1994;91:9223–9227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nameki N, Tadaki T, Muto A, Himeno H. Amino acid acceptor identity switch of Escherichia coli tmRNA from alanine to histidine in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;289:1–7. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ushida C, Himeno H, Watanabe T, Muto A. tRNA-like structures in 10Sa RNAs of Mycoplasma capricolum and Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:3392–3396. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.16.3392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karzai AW, Susskind MM, Sauer RT. SmpB, a unique RNA-binding protein essential for the peptide-tagging activity of SsrA (tmRNA) EMBO J. 1999;18:3793–3799. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.13.3793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barends S, Wower J, Kraal B. Kinetic parameters for tmRNA binding to alanyl-tRNA synthetase and elongation factor Tu from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 2000;39:2652–2658. doi: 10.1021/bi992439d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rudinger-Thirion J, Giege R, Felden B. Aminoacylated tmRNA from Escherichia coli interacts with prokaryotic elongation factor Tu. RNA. 1999;5:989–992. doi: 10.1017/s135583829999101x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Williams KP, Bartel DP. Phylogenetic analysis of tmRNA secondary structure. RNA. 1996;2:1306–1310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gueneau de Novoa P, Williams KP. The tmRNA website: reductive evolution of tmRNA in plastids and other endosymbionts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D104–108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nameki N, Tadaki T, Himeno H, Muto A. Three of four pseudoknots in tmRNA are interchangeable and are substitutable with single-stranded RNAs. FEBS Lett. 2000;470:345–349. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tanner DR, Dewey JD, Miller MR, Buskirk AR. Genetic analysis of the structure and function of transfer messenger RNA pseudoknot 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:10561–10566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600167200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Keiler KC, Waller PR, Sauer RT. Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA. Science. 1996;271:990–993. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5251.990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bessho Y, Shibata R, Sekine S, Murayama K, Higashijima K, Hori-Takemoto C, Shirouzu M, Kuramitsu S, Yokoyama S. Structural basis for functional mimicry of long-variable-arm tRNA by transfer-messenger RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2007;104:8293–8298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700402104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kurita D, Sasaki R, Muto A, Himeno H. Interaction of SmpB with ribosome from directed hydroxyl radical probing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7248–7255. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gottesman S, Roche E, Zhou Y, Sauer RT. The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1338–1347. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.9.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Herman C, Thevenet D, Bouloc P, Walker GC, D'Ari R. Degradation of carboxy-terminal-tagged cytoplasmic proteins by the Escherichia coli protease HflB (FtsH) Genes Dev. 1998;12:1348–1355. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.9.1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Choy JS, Aung LL, Karzai AW. Lon protease degrades transfer-messenger RNA-tagged proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:6564–6571. doi: 10.1128/JB.00860-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bugaeva EY, Shpanchenko OV, Felden B, Isaksson LA, Dontsova OA. One SmpB molecule accompanies tmRNA during its passage through the ribosomes. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1532–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shimizu Y, Ueda T. The role of SmpB protein in trans-translation. FEBS Lett. 2002;514:74–77. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02333-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hanawa-Suetsugu K, Takagi M, Inokuchi H, Himeno H, Muto A. SmpB functions in various steps of trans-translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1620–1629. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.7.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Williams KP, Martindale KA, Bartel DP. Resuming translation on tmRNA: a unique mode of determining a reading frame. EMBO J. 1999;18:5423–5433. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.19.5423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee S, Ishii M, Tadaki T, Muto A, Himeno H. Determinants on tmRNA for initiating efficient and precise trans-translation: Some mutations upstream of the tag-encoding sequence of Escherichia coli tmRNA shift the initiation point of trans-translation in vitro. RNA. 2001;7:999–1012. doi: 10.1017/s1355838201010342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Konno T, Kurita D, Takada K, Muto A, Himeno H. A functional interaction of SmpB with tmRNA for determination of the resuming point of trans-translation. RNA. 2007;13:1723–1731. doi: 10.1261/rna.604907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fu J, Hashem Y, Wower I, Lei JL, Liao HY, Zwieb C, Wower J, Frank J. Visualizing the transfer-messenger RNA as the ribosome resumes translation. EMBO J. 2010;29:3819–3825. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shpanchenko OV, Zvereva MI, Ivanov PV, Bugaeva EY, Rozov AS, Bogdanov AA, Kalkum M, Isaksson LA, Nierhaus KH, Dontsova OA. Stepping transfer messenger RNA through the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:18368–18374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409094200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ivanova N, Lindell M, Pavlov M, Schiavone LH, Wagner EGH, Ehrenberg M. Structure probing of tmRNA in distinct stages of trans-translation. RNA. 2007;13:713–722. doi: 10.1261/rna.451507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moore SD, Sauer RT. Ribosome rescue: tmRNA tagging activity and capacity in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;58:456–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ivanova N, Pavlov MY, Felden B, Ehrenberg M. Ribosome rescue by tmRNA requires truncated mRNAs. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2004;338:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Keiler KC. Biology of trans-Translation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;62:133–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moore SD, Sauer RT. The tmRNA system for translational surveillance and ribosome rescue. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007;76:101–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Doma MK, Parker R. RNA quality control in eukaryotes. Cell. 2007;131:660–668. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Christensen SK, Gerdes K. RelE toxins from bacteria and Archaea cleave mRNAs on translating ribosomes, which are rescued by tmRNA. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;48:1389–1400. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pedersen K, Zavialov AV, Pavlov MY, Elf J, Gerdes K, Ehrenberg M. The bacterial toxin RelE displays codon-specific cleavage of mRNAs in the ribosomal A site. Cell. 2003;112:131–140. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuo HK, Krasich R, Bhagwat AS, Kreuzer KN. Importance of the tmRNA system for cell survival when transcription is blocked by DNA-protein cross-links. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;78:686–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07355.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abo T, Ueda K, Sunohara T, Ogawa K, Aiba H. SsrA-mediated protein tagging in the presence of miscoding drugs and its physiological role in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells. 2002;7:629–638. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ueda K, Yamamoto Y, Ogawa K, Abo T, Inokuchi H, Aiba H. Bacterial SsrA system plays a role in coping with unwanted translational readthrough caused by suppressor tRNAs. Genes Cells. 2002;7:509–519. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hayes CS, Sauer RT. Cleavage of the A site mRNA codon during ribosome pausing provides a mechanism for translational quality control. Mol. Cell. 2003;12:903–911. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00385-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li X, Hirano R, Tagami H, Aiba H. Protein tagging at rare codons is caused by tmRNA action at the 3' end of nonstop mRNA generated in response to ribosorne stalling. RNA. 2006;12:248–255. doi: 10.1261/rna.2212606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X, Yagi M, Morita T, Aiba H. Cleavage of mRNAs and role of tmRNA system under amino acid starvation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;68:462–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li X, Yokota T, Ito K, Nakamura Y, Aiba H. Reduced action of polypeptide release factors induces mRNA cleavage and tmRNA tagging at stop codons in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2007;63:116–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sunohara T, Jojima K, Tagami H, Inada T, Aiba H. Ribosome stalling during translation elongation induces cleavage of mRNA being translated in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:15368–15375. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312805200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sunohara T, Jojima K, Yamamoto Y, Inada T, Aiba H. Nascent-peptide-mediated ribosome stalling at a stop codon induces mRNA cleavage resulting in nonstop mRNA that is recognized by tmRNA. RNA. 2004;10:378–386. doi: 10.1261/rna.5169404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Garza-Sanchez F, Gin JG, Hayes CS. Amino acid starvation and colicin D treatment induce A-site mRNA cleavage in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;378:505–519. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.02.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Garza-Sanchez F, Shoji S, Fredrick K, Hayes CS. RNase II is important for A-site mRNA cleavage during ribosome pausing. Mol. Microbiol. 2009;73:882–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06813.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Garza-Sanchez F, Janssen BD, Hayes CS. Prolyl-tRNA(Pro) in the A-site of SecM-arrested ribosomes inhibits the recruitment of transfer-messenger RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:34258–34268. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608052200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ruhe ZC, Hayes CS. The N-terminus of GalE Induces tmRNA activity in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.F G-S, RE S, BD J, CS H. tmRNA regulates synthesis of the ArfA ribosome rescue factor. Mol. Microbiol. 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07638.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chadani Y, Ono K, Ozawa S, Takahashi Y, Takai K, Nanamiya H, Tozawa Y, Kutsukake K, Abo T. Ribosome rescue by Escherichia coli ArfA (YhdL) in the absence of trans-translation system. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;78:796–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kobayashi K, Kuwana R, Takamatsu H. kinA mRNA is missing a stop codon in the undomesticated Bacillus subtilis strain ATCC 6051. Microbiology. 2008;154:54–63. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011783-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abo T, Inada T, Ogawa A, Aiba H. SsrA-mediated tagging and proteolysis of Lacl and its role in the regulation of lac operon. EMBO J. 2000;19:3762–3769. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.14.3762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ujiie H, Matsutani T, Tomatsu H, Fujihara A, Ushida C, Miwa Y, Fujita Y, Himeno H, Muto A. trans-Translation is involved in the CcpA-dependent tagging and degradation of TreP in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biochem. 2009;145:59–66. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvn143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Keiler K. Physiology of tmRNA: what gets tagged and why? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Huang C, Wolfgang MC, Withey J, Koomey M, Friedman DI. Charged tmRNA but not tmRNA-mediated proteolysis is essential for Neisseria gonorrhoeae viability. EMBO J. 2000;19:1098–1107. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.5.1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hutchison CA, Peterson SN, Gill SR, Cline RT, White O, Fraser CM, Smith HO, Venter JC. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science. 1999;286:2165–2169. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5447.2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Novick VL, Amaya K, Judson N, Mekalanos JJ. A genome-scale analysis for identification of genes required for growth or survival of Haemophilus influenzae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2002;99:966–971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012602299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Julio SM, Heithoff DM, Mahan MJ. ssrA (tmRNA) plays a role in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pathogenesis. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:1558–1563. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.6.1558-1563.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Keiler KC, Shapiro L. tmRNA is required for correct timing of DNA replication in Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:573–580. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.2.573-580.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Okan NA, Mena P, Benach JL, Bliska JB, Karzai AW. The smpB-ssrA mutant of Yersinia pestis functions as a live attenuated vaccine to protect mice against pulmonary plague infection. Infect. Immun. 2010;78:1284–1293. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00976-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shin J, Price CW. The ssrA-smpB ribosome rescue system is important for growth of Bacillus subtilis at low and high temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:3729–3737. doi: 10.1128/JB.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Muto A, Fujihara A, Ito KI, Matsuno J, Ushida C, Himeno H. Requirement of transfer-messenger RNA for the growth of Bacillus subtilis under stresses. Genes Cells. 2000;5:627–635. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Montero CI, Lewis DL, Johnson MR, Conners SB, Nance EA, Nichols JD, Kelly RM. Colocation of genes encoding a tRNA-mRNA hybrid and a putative signaling peptide on complementary strands in the genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:6802–6807. doi: 10.1128/JB.00470-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Keiler KC, Shapiro L. tmRNA in Caulobacter crescentus is cell cycle regulated by temporally controlled transcription and RNA degradation. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:1825–1830. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.6.1825-1830.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hong SJ, Tran QA, Keiler KC. Cell cycle-regulated degradation of tmRNA is controlled by RNase R and SmpB. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;57:565–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04709.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Keiler KC, Shapiro L, Williams KP. tmRNAs that encode proteolysis-inducing tags are found in all known bacterial genomes: A two-piece tmRNA functions in Caulobacter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2000;97:7778–7783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sharkady SM, Williams KP. A third lineage with two-piece tmRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:4531–4538. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Russell J, Keiler K. Subcellular localization of a bacterial regulatory RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009;106:16405–16409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904904106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bengtson MH, Joazeiro CA. Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control. Nature. 2010;467:470–473. doi: 10.1038/nature09371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES