Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mov Disord. 2011 Jun 14;26(11):2140–2141. doi: 10.1002/mds.23786

Mutation in 5’upstream region of GCHI gene causes familial dopa-responsive dystonia

Nutan Sharma 1, Ioanna A Armata 1, Trisha J Multhaupt-Buell 1, Laurie J Ozelius 2, Winnie Xin 3, Katherine B Sims 3
PMCID: PMC3175261  NIHMSID: NIHMS290579  PMID: 21674621

Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is commonly caused by heterozygous mutations in the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) cyclohydrolase I gene (GCH1) [1]. In the 5’ upstream region, 3 different mutations have been identified in 2 subjects with DRD [2,3]. One subject had 2 mutations, -39C>T and -132C>T and another had a single mutation, -22 C>T, with no data available on first-degree relatives [2, 3]. We report on multiple generations of one family with DRD, in whom the -22 C>T mutation segregates with affected status.

One family of Irish/French-Canadian ethnicity was studied. Ten family members, spanning 3 generations, underwent a neurologic exam and provided blood samples. The local institutional review board approved the study. All participants gave informed consent.

The criterion for definite DRD was definite dystonia and a marked, sustained response to levodopa or dopamine agonist [4]. The criterion for probable DRD was definite dystonia in a subject who declined a trial of medication. A movement disorders neurologist (NS) determined the diagnosis and affected sites as described [5]. Establishment of dystonia status was made prior to genetic testing, which was done blind to clinical designation.

The full GCHI gene (exons 1 -6) was analyzed by bi-directional sequencing from genomic DNA from every subject. Control samples, consisting of 46 European Caucasian samples from the CEPH collection and 7 from the discarded sample collection of the Massachusetts General Hospital Neurogenetics DNA Diagnostic Lab, were utilized.

Six subjects had dystonia (III-2, III-4, IV-2, IV-5, V-2 and V-3). Four were receiving medical treatment (III-2, III-4, IV-5 and V-2). All six affected subjects experienced onset in a foot or leg during childhood. Two displayed involvement of a non-contiguous body region; the neck and right leg in subject III-2 and the neck, right leg and left hand in subject V-2. Duration of disease varied, from one year (V-3) to fifty-four years (III-2). Subject V-2, with the greatest spread in symptoms, had DRD for twelve years. Subject III-4 did not display any progression, with dystonia remaining in the right foot, and had DRD for fifty-three years. Of the affected subjects, three demonstrated a good response to relatively low therapeutic doses of carbidopa/levodopa (III-2, III-4, V-2). IV-5 became nauseous on carbidopa/levodopa but displayed a good response to a relatively low therapeutic dose of ropinirole. Subject IV-2 had taken carbidopa/levodopa in the past and saw improvement, but discontinued medication based on personal preference. Subject V-3 had relatively mild symptoms and declined medical treatment. Thus, V-3 was classified as probable DRD and the other affected subjects (III-2, III-4, IV-2, IV-5, V-2) were classified as definite DRD.

We demonstrate that the -22 C>T mutation in the GCH1 gene segregates with affected status in multiple generations of a single DRD family. This mutation was not found in 53 control samples (106 normal alleles), nor in 214 clinical samples (428 alleles), about which we have no phenotypic information, that have been sequenced in the MGH Neurogenetics DNA Diagnostic Laboratory. This makes it likely that the -22 C>T mutation is pathogenic and results in DRD.

Figure 1. Pedigree.

Figure 1

Arrow identifies proband. Shaded symbols represent those with dopa-responsive dystonia. Clear symbols indicate unaffected individuals. Asterisk (*) identifies those who underwent an exam and provided DNA. The (+) are those with the mutation and‘wildtype’ are those without the mutation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NINDS 5P50NS037409 (NS and LJO).

Footnotes

No author has a financial conflict of interest that relates to this manuscript.

Documentation of Author Roles

Conception of Research Project: Nutan Sharma, Ioanna Armata, Laurie Ozelius and Katherine Sims

Organization of Research Project: Trisha Multhaupt-Buell

Execution of Research Project: Nutan Sharma, Ioanna Armata, Trisha Multhaupt-Buell and Winnie Xin

Manuscript preparation of first draft: Nutan Sharma

Manuscript review and critique: Nutan Sharma, Ioanna Armata, Laurie Ozelius, Winnie Xin and Katherine Sims

Full financial disclosure for the last 12 months:

Nutan Sharma: Supported by NINDS 5P50NS037409, clinical revenue and consultation as an expert witness.

Ioanna Armata: Supported by NINDS 5P50NS037409

Trisha Multhaupt-Buell: Supported by NINDS 5P50NS037409

Laurie J. Ozelius: Supported by 5P50NS037409, R01 NS046340-02, R21 RR026123, R01 NS058949-01 and Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia & Parkinson Foundation

Winnie Xin: Supported by grants from the Harvard Catalyst Program, Genzyme Corporation (Neuroimaging Characteristics in Fabry Disease, Fabry Disease Diagnostic Screening and Lysosomal Disease Center of Excellence) and the Fabry Support and Information Group

Katherine B Sims: Supported by grants from the Harvard Catalyst Program, Genzyme Corporation (Neuroimaging Characteristics in Fabry Disease, Fabry Disease Diagnostic Screening and Lysosomal Disease Center of Excellence), Fabry Support and Information Group and clinical revenue.

References

  • 1.Segawa M, Hosaka A, Miyagawa F, Nomura Y, Imai H. Hereditary progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation. Adv Neurol. 1976;14:215–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tassin J, Durr A, Bonnet A, Gil R, Vidailhet M, Lucking CB, Goas J, et al. Levodopa-responsive dystonia GTP cyclohydrolase I or parkin mutations? Brain. 2000;123:1112–1121. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.6.1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bandmann O, Valente EM, Holmans P, Surtees AH, Walters JH, Wevers RA, Marsden CD, et al. Dopa-responsive dystonia: a clinical and molecular genetic study. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:649–656. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nygaard TG, Marsden CD, Duvoisin RC. Dopa-responsive dystonia. Adv Neurol. 1988;50:377–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sharma N, Franco RA, Kuster J, Mitchell AA, Fuchs T, Saunders-Pullman R, Raymond D, et al. Genetic evidence for an association of the TOR1A locus with segmental/focal dystonia. Mov Disord. 25:2183–2187. doi: 10.1002/mds.23225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES