Abstract
Synopsis
Great progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis, treatment, and transmission of HIV and the factors influencing the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). However, many questions regarding the molecular evolution and genetic diversity of HIV in the context of MTCT remain unanswered. Further research to identify the selective factors governing which variants are transmitted, how the compartmentalization of HIV in different cells and tissues contributes to transmission, and the influence of host immunity, viral diversity and recombination on MTCT may provide insight into new prevention strategies and the development of an effective HIV vaccine.
Keywords: HIV, mother-to-child transmission, sequence, molecular evolution, diversity, risk factor
Introduction
In most wealthy or industrialized countries, the frequency of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) has been reduced to less than 2% as a result of prevention strategies including access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), replacement of breast-feeding, elective caesarean section, or a combination thereof [1]. However, in many resource-limited countries with high levels of endemic infection, transmission of HIV-1 from mother to child is recognized as a leading cause of infant and child mortality, where in the absence of antiretroviral treatment (ART) and prophylaxis, more than 25% of infants born to HIV-positive women become infected with HIV [2,3].
MTCT may be influenced by a number of maternal characteristics, including high plasma viral load, low CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, other cervico-vaginal infections at delivery, and concentration of virus in breast-milk [4–6]. In settings where prolonged breast-feeding is practiced, infection rates may rise to nearly 40%. Social/behavioral risk factors for MTCT include lack of access to prevention-of-mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) services and high-risk sexual behavior or injection drug use during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy [7].
Consensus conventions adopted to classify the presumed timing of transmission distinguish between in utero, intrapartum/early postpartum, and late postpartum acquisition of infant infection. Infants are classified as having acquired in utero infection on the basis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of HIV-1 RNA or DNA from samples obtained within 72 hours of birth. Infants negative by PCR at birth but in whom infection is detectable by 2–6 weeks are regarded as cases of intra-partum or early postpartum transmission. In these infants, transmission of virus is thought to have occurred during very late gestation, labor, or delivery, potentially though oral and mucosal exposure to maternal virus in blood, cervical secretions, or colostrum via early breast feeding. Infants with undetectable infection by screening assays within 6–8 weeks of birth who later acquire infection are deemed to have late postpartum infection presumed to be transmitted through breast-feeding [8,9].
Whether cell-associated provirus or viral RNA from blood, cervical secretions, or breast-milk is the primary source of infection in each of these settings is not well understood. The early observation that the first-born twin of an HIV-infected mother is much more likely to acquire infection than the subsequently born twin supported the idea that trauma and contact with maternal blood and secretions is important in MTCT [10], although a more recent study did not corroborate this finding [11]. When maternal ART is initiated in the second trimester at 24–28 weeks, less than 2% of infants acquire HIV infection, suggesting that early infection in utero occurs much less frequently than infection in later stages [12]. The most striking reductions in MTCT are seen when HIV RNA is suppressed by ART and post-partum prophylaxis is given to the newborn. Without ART there is more than a two-fold increase in transmission for every log increase in maternal virus load [13]. Transmission from mothers with less than 1,000 copies/ml of plasma HIV RNA is unusual [14]. Similarly, there is an independent association of higher maternal CD4 cell numbers with reduced transmission, suggesting that the maternal immune response plays a role in limiting MTCT [15].
It is hypothesized that infant infection acquired at different stages may result from distinct modes of viral transmission associated with unique virus sub-populations, or quasi-species, derived from the diversity of viruses present during chronic infection in the mother. The extent to which viral genetic and evolutionary characteristics influence the risk of MTCT of HIV remains unclear. Investigation of the genetic composition and evolution of HIV in the context of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) may elucidate viral risk factors for transmission, infection, and disease progression. As HIV sequence data become more widely available, analysis of these data will provide a more complete understanding of the factors influencing MTCT and enable development of additional prevention strategies.
Selection and Bottlenecks in MTCT of HIV
Cases of MTCT represent an opportunity to identify the virologic characteristics associated with transmission. Some studies have investigated specific characteristics of viral genes while others have analyzed the diversity of HIV-1 quasi-species, comparing the range of virus diversity in maternal samples to those obtained from the infant. These studies suggest that infection in the infant is usually initiated by a single or limited number of maternal viruses, indicating the presence of a bottleneck in vertical HIV transmission [16]. Such a bottleneck may provide an opportunity for intervention strategies in MTCT and transmission in general.
The extensive diversity of viruses present in prolonged HIV-1 infection within individuals, including pregnant women, is the result of continuing viral expansion, selection, and evolution in the face of immune and/or drug pressures. In chronic infection up to 1012 new virions are produced each day in an infected individual [17], with a high rate of evolutionary change driven primarily by the poor fidelity of both reverse transcriptase and RNA polymerase. The rate of erroneous nucleotide substitution during reverse transcription is approximately one nucleotide per 105 base pairs [18]. This is accompanied by the absence of mis-sense correction mechanisms in the reverse transcription and synthesis of the viral genome.
The viral diversity generated by mutation, nucleotide substitution and point mutation, insertion/deletions, and duplication, is acted upon by selective pressure from the host humoral and cellular immune systems and when present, antiretroviral drug therapy. In addition, the phenomenon of strand switching, in which the viral reverse transcriptase switches within or between viral RNA template strands in synthesizing a DNA transcript, enables frequent recombination events. A robust host immune response exerts a strong selective force on the viral population, and patients with longer asymptomatic phases typically show evidence of greater positive selection [19,20], defined by a per-site rate of non-synonymous mutation (dN) exceeding that of synonymous mutation (dS) [19,21,22]. Vertical HIV transmission events are shaped by extensive diversity in maternal virus, genetic bottlenecks in MTCT, and potential founder effects in the infected infant resulting in relative viral homogeneity of early infant infection, although the extent of diversity may vary by mode of transmission [16,23]. MTCT may result in the transmission of a minor subset of maternal viruses with subsequently limited viral diversity in infant viral sequences compared to the maternal sequences [24–26]. In some settings there is evidence that infection in utero may involve transmission of a greater diversity of maternal viral variants compared to transmission at delivery [24,27].
The associations among the strength of positive selection, progression of maternal disease, and HIV transmission are not well-defined. Numerous small studies suggest that viral variants transmitted from mother-to-child are derived from a minority virus population which has effectively escaped the maternal immune response [24,26,28,29–32]. In addition, transmitted viruses may derive from the major maternal variant in compartments including blood, placenta, or cervical secretions in the birth canal. Differences between maternal and infant immunogenetics, particularly human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specificity in the recognition of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes by maternal and infant immune responses, likely play a role in selection. Additionally, some transmitted viruses may have a replication advantage in the infant and may therefore be naturally selected [33]. Alternatively, success of a particular variant may result from stochastic effects unrelated to selection [34]. In a phylogenetic analysis of maternal and infant C2V3 envelope sequences, Ceballos et al. found that during early pregnancy a single minor viral variant was transmitted to the infant followed by subsequent evolution, suggesting either a selection process or a stochastic event, whereas in later maternal infection (during the final trimester or via breast feeding), maternal and infant sequences were intermingled, suggesting repeated transmission of multiple viral variants [34]. This analysis did not detect positive selection (dN/dS >1) in the maternal and infant sequences, suggesting that stochastic effects accounted for the viral quasispecies that were successfully transmitted.
Role of Viral Recombination and Diversity in MTCT of HIV
HIV has an estimated recombination rate of three events per genome per replication, one of the highest rates of all organisms [35]. Recombination occurs as a result of host cell superinfection by distinct viruses [36–38]. Inter- and intra-subtype recombination are major driving forces of HIV genetic diversity [39,40] and have resulted in a wide distribution of circulating recombinant forms which contribute significantly to the global pandemic (accounting for >25% of infections in some areas) [39,41–43]. Recombination events allow viruses to escape immune pressure, avoid accumulation of deleterious mutations, or jump between adaptive peaks [44–47]. Recombinant viruses may also have fitness and/or transmission advantages, potentially enhancing observed rates of MTCT [48]. Quan et al. reported that defective HIV provirus with a lethal mutation in env can be rescued by superinfection with either a wild-type virion or a second replication-defective virus with a lethally-mutated capsid protein [49]. These findings suggest that noninfectious HIV-1 variants may constitute a large proportion of in vivo HIV populations (9 out of 10 clones isolated from infected brain for example) and that the rescue of such defective variants may be attributable to recombination events [50].
Within geographic settings where multiple HIV subtypes circulate and recombine, subtype-specific differences have been observed in timing and rate of transmission. It has been suggested that geographic differences in rates of MTCT may be related to the genetic diversity of HIV in different settings [51,52]. HIV-1 subtypes and recombinant forms may have functional and phenotypic differences, including chemokine coreceptor usage, replication efficiency, and viral load that may lead to differences in rates of vertical transmission [53–62]. Studies examining the rate of MTCT by maternal subtype or recombinant infection have yielded discrepant findings. Pádua et al. were unable to detect specific genetic forms in env or nef sequences associated with MTCT or a significant difference in RNA viral load by viral subtype, but found a greater diversity of genetic forms among non-transmitting mothers [52]. The latter suggests that increased maternal immune pressure may successfully limit transmission. Renjifo et al. found that MTCT was more common among Tanzanian mothers infected with viruses that included a subtype C envelope, compared to viruses with subtype A or D (or A/D recombinant) envelope [62]. In Kenya, Yang et al. found MTCT to be more common among mothers infected with subtype D or A/D recombinant viruses compared to subtype A [63]. In a separate study based on the C2–C5 envelope and 5′LTR regions, Renjifo et al. found that some intersubtype recombinant viruses are preferentially transmitted during breast feeding [6].
Whether and how recombinant viruses have a transmission advantage in MTCT warrants further investigation, particularly with the increasing prevalence of circulating recombinant forms of HIV-1. Studies interpreting the effect of viral genotype on the risk of MTCT may be enhanced by increased sample sizes, adjustment of confounding variables, and improved detection of recombinants on a population level [6,60–65]. Paradoxically, the success of ART and prevention limits the potential of MTCT studies as infant infection becomes less frequent in study populations.
Phylogenetics, Compartmentalization, and MTCT of HIV
Phylogenetic analyses of HIV genetic sequences provide insight into the genetic relatedness of multiple virus variants within or between individuals and across populations. These analyses can uncover trends within an epidemic and also provide insight into the origins, timing, and demographic history of transmitted viruses [66–68]. Phylogenetic comparisons of infant and maternal sequences from various compartments are crucial to understanding the viral evolution in these tissues and their respective contributions to the risk of MTCT.
Compartmentalization of HIV infection involves the formation of distinct genetic populations in specific organs, cells or tissues. Compartments of special importance to MTCT are the maternal genital tract, placenta, and breast milk. Multiple studies have shown that HIV variants from the genital tract appear distinct from the blood [69–81], although HIV-1 viral load is typically lower in these compartments compared to plasma [82–84]. Localized inflammation, co-infections, physical and cellular barriers, incomplete penetration of antiretroviral drugs into the genital tract or local immune responses may account for independent and divergent evolution within the maternal genital tract compared to plasma [70–72,85,86].
Bull et al. analyzed HIV-1 RNA and cell-associated HIV-1 DNA (env) from the blood and genital tract of women with chronic HIV-infection and reported low diversity of genital-tract-specific phylogenetic clades, particularly from the cervix, consistent with bursts of viral replication or the proliferation of infected cells in compartments [83]. However, the absence of tissue-specific genetic features and the phylogenetic overlap of genital tract HIV clades with those from the blood suggest that HIV-1 flow is not restricted between the genital tract and blood, and that viral evolution may not occur independently within the two compartments [83].
HIV compartmentalization between blood and breast milk is also not well-understood. Breast milk transmission is a major source of pediatric HIV infection [87,88], yet the few studies of viral compartmentalization in breast milk provide contradictory results [89–92]. In the absence of antiretroviral therapy HIV-1 viral load is 10–100 fold lower in breast milk than in plasma [82]. Whether this indicates limited exchange of virus between the two compartments or is instead a consequence of differential immune selection remains unclear. Immunologic elements such as HIV-specific T-cells, antibodies, cytokines, and chemokines appear to be highly compartmentalized in breast milk [93–95]. For example, Becquart et al. detected compartmentalization of the humoral IgG response to HIV in the mammary gland [96]. Despite these seemingly unique immunologic environments, Heath et al. recently examined the compartmentalization of HIV-1 between breast milk and blood in envelope sequences from 13 breast-feeding women and uncovered substantial genetic overlap [97]. Specifically, genetic compartmentalization in breast milk was only detected in one of six subjects with contemporaneously-collected samples available. The authors suggest that virologic selection in breast milk does not account for the genetic bottleneck associated with mother-to-child transmission [97]. Further studies will clarify the extent to which potential tissue-specific virologic divergence may influence the risk of transmission or the characteristics of the transmitted variant.
Implications for Drug Resistance and Vaccine Design in MTCT of HIV
The ability of HIV to accumulate and exchange drug resistance via single-nucleotide mutations and recombination presents a clinical dilemma in the use of ART, particularly single-dose nevirapine to prevent MTCT. Once drug resistance has been selected, it may persist in circulating viral RNA and within latent reservoirs of proviral DNA [47]. The persistence of maternal drug resistance mutations following drug exposure during pregnancy presents significant challenges to the design of optimal antiretroviral regimens that prevent MTCT without compromising the efficacy of HAART for mothers [98]. Short-course peripartum regimens in resource-poor settings, including maternal single-dose nevirapine and short-course zidovudine, significantly reduce MTCT (37–77% compared to no intervention) [99–105]. However, up to two-thirds of mothers treated with these regimens develop viral resistance to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) drugs [106]. Universal HAART, already a mainstay of maternal HIV treatment in developed or resource-rich countries, could mitigate some of the burden of drug resistance associated with peripartum regimens and has been recommended for pregnant and breast-feeding mothers in resource-poor settings [98].
Consideration of HIV molecular evolution and diversity is also important in the design of HIV vaccine strategies [22]. There is compelling rationale to develop a preventive HIV vaccine for use in infants to prevent vertical transmission via breast milk and provide a foundation for life-long immunity [107]. Several recent advances in HIV vaccine research and development, including the partial protection imparted by the ALVAC-AIDSVAX vaccine in Thailand [108], identification of a novel HIV-1 vaccine target expressed on envelope protein [109], and vaccine-induced control of simian immunodeficiency virus in rhesus monkeys [110], have given momentum to renewed efforts to develop an HIV vaccine. The genetic bottlenecks observed in MTCT provide a model for selective transmission, which may inform the design of vaccines, the identification of target antigens, and potentially, the inclusion of infants and pregnant women in preventive vaccine trials. An understanding of the bottleneck(s) in transmission and specific characteristics of transmitted viruses coupled with innovative vaccine technologies, advances in HIV vaccinology, and recruitment of scientific talent are important steps towards achieving a successful HIV vaccine [111].
Conclusions and Future Directions
Great progress has been made in understanding the evolution of HIV and the factors influencing the risk of MTCT. Translation of these scientific advances, primarily in the use of antiretroviral drugs to prevent MTCT of HIV, has led to successful interventions and significant reductions in infant infection where preventive strategies have been made available. However, many questions regarding the impact of molecular evolution and extensive genetic diversity of HIV on MTCT remain unanswered. Studies of viral characteristics that contribute to the risk of vertical transmission may inform drug and vaccine prevention efforts. Further research to identify the selective factors governing which variants are transmitted, how the compartmentalization of HIV in different cells and tissues contributes to transmission, and the influence of viral diversity and recombination on the risk of MTCT, may provide insight into new therapeutic and preventive strategies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Athena Kourtis, Marc Bulterys, and Keyan Salari for their helpful comments and critical reading of the manuscript. PB would like to thank Dmitri Petrov and members of the Petrov molecular evolution laboratory at the Stanford Department of Biology for helpful discussion, guidance, and insight. SD is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), the California HIV Research Program (CHRP), and the Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans. PB is supported by the UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Newell ML, Coovadia H, Cortina-Borja M, Rollins N, Gaillard P, Dabis F. Mortality of infected and uninfected infants born to HIV-infected mothers in Africa: a pooled analysis. Lancet. 2004;364:1236–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17140-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mofenson LM. Prevention in neglected subpopulations: prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:130–48. doi: 10.1086/651484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bulterys M, Wilfert CM. HAART during pregnancy and during breast feeding among HIV-infected women in the developing world: has the time come? AIDS. 2009;23:2473–2477. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333866c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Garcia PM, Kalish LA, Pitt J, et al. Maternal levels of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA and the risk of perinatal transmission. Women and Infants Transmission Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:394–402. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mofenson LM, Lambert JS, Stiehm ER, et al. Risk factors for perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in women treated with zidovudine. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 185 Team. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:385–93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koulinska IN, Villamor E, Msamanga G, et al. Risk of HIV-1 transmission by breastfeeding among mothers infected with recombinant and non-recombinant HIV-1 genotypes. Virus Res. 2006;120:191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bulterys M, Landesman S, Burns D, Rubinstein A, Goedert J. Sexual behavior and injection drug use during pregnancy and vertical transmission of HIV-1. JAIDS. 1997;15:76–82. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199705010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kourtis AP, Bulterys M, Nesheim S, Lee F. Understanding the timing of HIV transmission from mother to infant. JAMA. 2001;285:709–712. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.6.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kourtis AP, Lee FK, Jamieson DJ, Bulterys M. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: timing and implications for prevention. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:726–732. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70629-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goedert JJ, Duliege AM, Amos CI, Felton S, Biggar RJ. High risk of HIV-1 infection for first-born twins. The International Registry of HIV-Exposed Twins. Lancet. 1991;338:1471–1475. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92297-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Biggar RJ, Cassol S, Kumwenda N, et al. The Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus–1 Infection in Twin Pairs Born to Infected Mothers in Africa. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:850–855. doi: 10.1086/377584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 with zidovudine treatment. N Eng J Med. 1994;331:1173–1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411033311801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guevara H, Casseb J, Zijenah LS, et al. Maternal HIV-1 antibody and vertical transmission in subtype C virus infection. JAIDS. 2002;29:435–440. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200204150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ioannidis J, Abrams E, Ammann A, et al. Perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by pregnant women with RNA virus loads <1000 copies/mL. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:539–545. doi: 10.1086/318530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leroy V, Karon JM, Alioum A, et al. Twenty-four month efficacy of a maternal short-course zidovudine regimen to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in West Africa. AIDS. 2002;16:631–641. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200203080-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Delwart E, Magierowska M, Royz M, et al. Homogeneous quasispecies in 16 out of 17 individuals during very early HIV-1 primary infection. AIDS. 2002;16:189–195. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Perelson AS, Neumann A, Markowitz M, Leonard J, Ho D. HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: virion clearance rate, infected cell life span, and viral generation time. Science. 1996;271:1582–1586. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5255.1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Temin HM. Retrovirus variation and reverse transcription: abnormal strand transfers result in retrovirus genetic variation. PNAS. 1993;90:6900–6903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.6900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross HA, Rodrigo AG. Immune-mediated positive selection drives human immunodeficiency virus type 1 molecular variation and predicts disease duration. J Virol. 2002;76:11715–11720. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11715-11720.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Williamson S. Adaptation in the env gene of HIV-1 and evolutionary theories of disease progression. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:1318–1325. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bonhoeffer S, Holmes EC, Nowak MA. Causes of HIV diversity. Nature. 1995;376:125. doi: 10.1038/376125a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rambaut A, Posada D, Crandall KA, Holmes EC. The causes and consequences of HIV evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5:52–61. doi: 10.1038/nrg1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhu T, Mo H, Wang N, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 in patients with primary infection. Science. 1993;261:1179–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.8356453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dickover RE, Garratty EM, Plaeger S, Bryson YJ. Perinatal transmission of major, minor, and multiple maternal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants in utero and intrapartum. J Virol. 2001;75:2194–2203. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2194-2203.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wolinsky SM, Wike CM, Korber BT, et al. Selective transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 variants from mothers to infants. Science. 1992;255:1134–1137. doi: 10.1126/science.1546316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ahmad N, Baroudy BM, Baker RC, Chappey C. Genetic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope V3 region isolates from mothers and infants after perinatal transmission. J Virol. 1995;69:1001–12. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.2.1001-1012.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Renjifo B, Chung M, Gilbert P, et al. In-utero transmission of quasispecies among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotypes. Virology. 2003;307:278–282. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(02)00066-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blish CA, Blay WM, Haigwood NL, Overbaugh J. Transmission of HIV-1 in the face of neutralizing antibodies. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5:578–587. doi: 10.2174/157016207782418461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kampinga GA, Simonon A, Van de Perre P, Karita E, Msellati P, Goudsmit J. Primary infections with HIV-1 of women and their offspring in Rwanda: findings of heterogeneity at seroconversion, coinfection, and recombinants of HIV-1 subtypes A and C. Virology. 1997;227:63–76. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.8318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kliks S, Contag CH, Corliss H, et al. Genetic analysis of viral variants selected in transmission of human immunodeficiency viruses to newborns. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000;16:1223–1233. doi: 10.1089/08892220050116998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Verhofstede C, Demecheleer E, De Cabooter N, et al. Diversity of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env sequence after vertical transmission in mother-child pairs infected with HIV-1 subtype A. J Virol. 2003;77:3050–3057. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.5.3050-3057.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu X, Parast AB, Richardson BA, et al. Neutralization escape variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are transmitted from mother to infant. J Virol. 2006;80:835–844. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.835-844.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuhn L, Abrams E, Palumbo P, et al. Maternal versus paternal inheritance of HLA class I alleles among HIV-infected children: consequences for clinical disease progression. AIDS. 2004;18:1281–1289. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200406180-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ceballos A, Andreani G, Ripamonti C, et al. Lack of viral selection in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mother-to-child transmission with primary infection during late pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2773–82. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.83697-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhuang J, Jetzt AE, Sun G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombination: rate, fidelity, and putative hot spots. J Virol. 2002;76:11273–11282. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11273-11282.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jung A, Maier R, Vartanian JP, et al. Multiply infected spleen cells in HIV patients. Nature. 2002;418:144. doi: 10.1038/418144a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jost S, Bernard MC, Kaiser L, et al. A patient with HIV-1 superinfection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:731–736. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Koelsch KK, Smith DM, Little SJ, et al. Clade B HIV-1 superinfection with wild-type virus after primary infection with drug-resistant clade B virus. AIDS. 2003;17:11–6. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200305020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Crandall KA, Templeton AR. The Evolution of HIV. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999. pp. 153–176. [Google Scholar]
- 40.McVean G, Awadalla P, Fearnhead P. A coalescent-based method for detecting and estimating recombination from gene sequences. Genetics. 2002;160:1231–1241. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Robertson DL, Sharp PM, McCutchan FE, Hahn BH. Recombination in HIV-1. Nature. 1995;374:124–126. doi: 10.1038/374124b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pandrea I, Robertson DL, Onanga R, et al. Analysis of partial pol and env sequences indicates a high prevalence of HIV type 1 recombinant strains circulating in Gabon. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002;18:1103–1116. doi: 10.1089/088922202320567842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Essex M, M’Boup S. AIDS in Africa. 2. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002. Regional Variation in the African Epidemics. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu SL, Mittler JE, Nickle DC, et al. Selection for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombinants in a patient with rapid progression to AIDS. J Virol. 2002;76:10674–10684. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.21.10674-10684.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nájera R, Delgado E, Pérez-Alvarez L, Thomson MM. Genetic recombination and its role in the development of the HIV-1 pandemic. AIDS. 2002;16:3–16. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200216004-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kellam P, Larder BA. Retroviral recombination can lead to linkage of reverse transcriptase mutations that confer increased zidovudine resistance. J Virol. 1995;69:669–674. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.2.669-674.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morris A, Marsden M, Halcrow K, et al. Mosaic structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome infecting lymphoid cells and the brain: evidence for frequent in vivo recombination events in the evolution of regional populations. J Virol. 1999;73:8720–8731. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.10.8720-8731.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Koulinska IN, Villamor E, Chaplin B, Msamanga G. Transmission of Cell-Free and Cell-Associated HIV-1 Through Breast-Feeding. JAIDS. 2006;41:93–99. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000179424.19413.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Quan Y, Liang C, Brenner B, Wainberg M. Multidrug-Resistant Variants of HIV Type 1 (HIV-1) Can Exist in Cells as Defective Quasispecies and Be Rescued by Superinfection with Other Defective HIV-1 Variants. J Infect Dis. 2009;9:1479–1483. doi: 10.1086/606117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li Y, Kappes JC, Conway JA, Price RW, Shaw GM, Hahn BH. Molecular characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cloned directly from uncultured human brain tissue: identification of replication-competent and-defective viral genomes. J Virol. 1991;65:3973–85. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.8.3973-3985.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Odaibo GN, Olaleye DO, Heyndrickx L, Vereecken K, Houwer K, Jassens W. Mother-to-child transmission of different HIV-1 subtypes among ARV naïve infected pregnant women in Nigeria. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo. 2006;48:77–80. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652006000200004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pádua E, Parreira R, Tendeiro R, et al. Potential impact of viral load and genetic makeup of HIV type 1 on mother-to-child transmission: characterization of env-C2V3C3 and nef sequences. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:1171–7. doi: 10.1089/aid.2009.0103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bjorndal A, Sonnerborg A, Tscherning C, Albert J, Fenyo EM. Phenotypic characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C isolates of Ethiopian AIDS patients. AIDS. 1999;15:647–653. doi: 10.1089/088922299310944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hu DJ, Vanichseni S, Mastro TD, et al. Viral load differences in early infection with two HIV-1 subtypes. AIDS. 2001;15:683–691. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200104130-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jeeninga RE, Hoogenkamp M, Armand-Ugon M, de Baar M, Verhoef K, Berkhout B. Functional differences between the long terminal repeat transcriptional promoters of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes A through G. J Virol. 2000;74:3740–3751. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.8.3740-3751.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kaleebu P, French N, Mahe C, et al. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope subtypes A and D on disease progression in a large cohort of HIV-1-positive persons in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1244–1250. doi: 10.1086/340130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kanki PJ, Hamel DJ, Sankale JL, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes differ in disease progression. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:68–73. doi: 10.1086/314557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Neilson JR, John GC, Carr JK, et al. Subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and disease stage among women in Nairobi, Kenya. J Virol. 1999;73:4393–4403. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.5.4393-4403.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tscherning C, Alaeus A, Fredriksson R, et al. Differences in chemokine coreceptor usage between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. Virology. 1998;241:181–188. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Blackard JT, Renjifo B, Chaplin B, Msamanga G, Fawzi W, Essex M. Diversity of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat following mother-to-child transmission. Virology. 2000;274:402–411. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Renjifo B, Fawzi W, Mwakagile D, et al. Differences in perinatal transmission among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotypes. J Hum Virol. 2001;4:16–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Renjifo B, Gilbert P, Chaplin B, et al. Preferential in utero transmission of HIV-1 subtype C compared to subtype A or D. AIDS. 2004;18:1629–1636. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000131392.68597.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yang C, Li M, Newman RD, et al. Genetic diversity of HIV-1 in western Kenya: subtype-specific differences in mother-to-child transmission. AIDS. 2003;11:1667–1674. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000060412.18106.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Murray MC, Embree JE, Ramdahin SG, Anzala AO, Njenga S, Plummer FA. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 viral genotype on mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:746–749. doi: 10.1086/315252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tapia N, Franco S, Puig-Basagoiti F, et al. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype on mother-to-child transmission. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:607–613. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.18754-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dalai S, de Oliveira T, Gordon W, et al. Evolution and molecular epidemiology of subtype C HIV-1 in Zimbabwe. AIDS. 2009;23:2523–2532. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283320ef3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Worobey M, Gemmel M, Teuwen DE, et al. Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960. Nature. 2008;455:661–664. doi: 10.1038/nature07390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Salemi M, de Oliveira T, Ciccozzi M, Rezza G, Goodenow MM. High-resolution molecular epidemiology and evolutionary history of HIV-1 subtypes in Albania. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Poss M, Martin HL, Kreiss JK, et al. Diversity in virus populations from genital secretions and peripheral blood from women recently infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1995;69:8118–8122. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.12.8118-8122.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Poss M, Rodrigo AG, Gosink JJ, et al. Evolution of envelope sequences from the genital tract and peripheral blood of women infected with clade A human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1998;72:8240–8251. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.10.8240-8251.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kovacs A, Wasserman SS, Burns D, et al. Determinants of HIV-1 shedding in the genital tract of women. Lancet. 2001;358:1593–1601. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06653-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wright TC, Jr, Subbarao S, Ellerbrock TV, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus 1 expression in the female genital tract in association with cervical inflammation and ulceration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:279–285. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.108999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ellerbrock TV, Lennox JL, Clancy KA, et al. Cellular replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 occurs in vaginal secretions. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:28–36. doi: 10.1086/321000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kemal KS, Foley B, Burger H, et al. HIV-1 in genital tract and plasma of women: compartmentalization of viral sequences, coreceptor usage, and glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:12972–12977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2134064100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.De Pasquale MP, Leigh Brown AJ, Uvin SC, et al. Differences in HIV-1 pol sequences from female genital tract and blood during antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:37–44. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200309010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Adal M, Ayele W, Wolday D, et al. Evidence of genetic variability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in plasma and cervicovaginal lavage in ethiopian women seeking care for sexually transmitted infections. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21:649–653. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tirado G, Jove G, Reyes E, et al. Differential evolution of cell-associated virus in blood and genital tract of HIV-infected females undergoing HAART. Virology. 2005;334:299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Philpott S, Burger H, Tsoukas C, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomic RNA sequences in the female genital tract and blood: compartmentalization and intrapatient recombination. J Virol. 2005;79:353–363. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.1.353-363.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sullivan ST, Mandava U, Evans-Strickfaden T, et al. Diversity, divergence, and evolution of cell-free human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vaginal secretions and blood of chronically infected women: associations with immune status. J Virol. 2005;79:9799–9809. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9799-9809.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Andreoletti L, Skrabal K, Perrin V, et al. Genetic and phenotypic features of blood and genital viral populations of clinically asymptomatic and antiretroviral-treatment-naive clade a human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1838–1842. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00113-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kemal KS, Burger H, Mayers D, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance in variants from the female genital tract and plasma. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:535–545. doi: 10.1086/510855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Semrau K, Ghosh M, Kankasa C, et al. Temporal and lateral dynamics of HIV shedding and elevated sodium in breast milk among HIV-positive mothers during the first 4 months of breast-feeding. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:320–328. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e31815e7436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bull ME, Learn GH, McElhone S, et al. Monotypic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotypes across the uterine cervix and in blood suggest proliferation of cells with provirus. J Virol. 2009;83:6020–6028. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02664-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dyer JR, Gilliam BL, Eron JJ, Jr, Grosso L, Cohen MS, Fiscus SA. Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in cell free seminal plasma: comparison of NASBA with Amplicor reverse transcription-PCR amplification and correlation with quantitative culture. J Virol Methods. 1996;60:161–170. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(96)02063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Si-Mohamed A, Kazatchkine MD, Heard I, et al. Selection of drug-resistant variants in the female genital tract of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women receiving antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:112–122. doi: 10.1086/315679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Min SS, Corbett AH, Rezk N, et al. Protease Inhibitor and Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Concentrations in the Genital Tract of HIV-1-Infected Women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37:1577–1580. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200412150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fowler MG, Lampe MA, Jamieson DJ, Kourtis AP, Rogers MF. Reducing the risk of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus transmission: past successes, current progress and challenges, and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kuhn L, Aldrovandi GM, Sinkala M, et al. Effects of Early, Abrupt Weaning for HIV-free Survival of Children in Zambia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1859. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Becquart P, Chomont N, Roques P, et al. Compartmentalization of HIV-1 between breast milk and blood of HIV-infected mothers. Virology. 2002;300:109–117. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Becquart P, Courgnaud V, Willumsen J, Van de Perre P. Diversity of HIV-1 RNA and DNA in breast milk from HIV-1-infected mothers. Virology. 2007;363:256–260. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Henderson GJ, Hoffman NG, Ping LH, et al. HIV-1 populations in blood and breast milk are similar. Virology. 2004;330:295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Andreotti M, Galluzzo CM, Guidotti G, et al. Comparison of HIV type 1sequences from plasma, cell-free breast milk, and cell-associated breast milk viral populations in treated and untreated women in Mozambique. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:707–711. doi: 10.1089/aid.2008.0276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sabbaj S, Edwards BH, Ghosh MK, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8+ T cells in human breast milk. J Virol. 2002;76:7365–7373. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.15.7365-7373.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sabbaj S, Ghosh MK, Edwards BH, et al. Breast milk-derived antigen-specific CD8+ T cells: an extralymphoid effector memory cell population in humans. J Immunol. 2005;174:2951–2956. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Nickle DC, Jensen MA, Shriner D, et al. Evolutionary indicators of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reservoirs and compartments. J Virol. 2003;77:5540–5546. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.9.5540-5546.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Becquart P, Hakim H, Benoit G, Sépou A, Michel D, Bélec L. Compartmentalization of the IgG immune response to HIV-1 in breast milk. AIDS. 1999;13:1323–1331. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199907300-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Heath L, Conway S, Jones L, et al. Restriction of HIV-1 Genotypes in Breast Milk Does Not Account for the Population Transmission Genetic Bottleneck That Occurs following Transmission. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Becquet R, Ekouevi D, Arrive E, et al. Universal antiretroviral therapy for pregnant and breast-feeding HIV-1–infected women: towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1936–1945. doi: 10.1086/648446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dabis F, Msellati P, Meda N, et al. 6-month efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of a short regimen of oral zidovudine to reduce vertical transmission of HIV in breastfed children in Cote d’Ivoire and Burkina Faso: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 1999;353:786–92. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dabis F, Bequet L, Ekouevi DK, et al. Field efficacy of zidovudine, lamivudine and single-dose nevirapine to prevent peripartum transmission of HIV. The ANRS 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus study, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. AIDS. 2005;19:309–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lallemant M, Jourdain G, Le Coeur S, et al. Single-dose perinatal nevirapine plus standard zidovudine to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:217–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Petra study team. Efficacy of three short-course regimens of zidovudine and lamivudine in preventing early and late transmission of HIV-1 from mother to child in Tanzania, South Africa, and Uganda (Petra study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1178–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08214-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Shaffer N, Chuachoowong R, Mock PA, et al. Short-course zidovudine for perinatal HIV-1 transmission in Bangkok, Thailand: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:773–80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10411-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wiktor SZ, Ekpini E, Karon JM, et al. Short-course oral zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:781–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10412-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Arrive E, Newell ML, Ekouevi DK, et al. Prevalence of resistance to nevirapine in mothers and children after single-dose exposure to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1009–21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Luzuriaga K, Dabis F, Excler JL, Sullivan J. Vaccines to prevent transmission of HIV-1 via breastmilk: scientific and logistical priorities. Lancet. 2006;368:511–521. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to Prevent HIV-1 Infection in Thailand. N Eng J Med. 2009;361:2209–2220. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Walker L, Phogat S, Chan-Hui P, et al. Broad and Potent Neutralizing Antibodies from an African Donor Reveal a New HIV-1 Vaccine Target. Science. 2009;326:285–289. doi: 10.1126/science.1178746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hansen S, Vieville C, Whizin N, et al. Effector memory T cell responses are associated with protection of rhesus monkeys from mucosal simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. Nature Med. 2009;15:293–299. doi: 10.1038/nm.1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Koff W. Accelerating HIV vaccine development. Nature. 2010;464:161–162. doi: 10.1038/464161a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
