Skip to main content
Endocrinology logoLink to Endocrinology
. 2011 Aug 9;152(10):3842–3851. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1180

Norepinephrine Causes a Biphasic Change in Mammalian Pinealocye Membrane Potential: Role of α1B-Adrenoreceptors, Phospholipase C, and Ca2+

Hana Zemkova 1, Stanko S Stojilkovic 1, David C Klein 1,
PMCID: PMC3176642  PMID: 21828176

Abstract

Perforated patch clamp recording was used to study the control of membrane potential (Vm) and spontaneous electrical activity in the rat pinealocyte by norepinephrine. Norepinephrine did not alter spiking frequency. However, it was found to act through α1B-adrenoreceptors in a concentration-dependent manner (0.1–10 μm) to produce a biphasic change in Vm. The initial response was a hyperpolarization (∼13 mV from a resting potential of −46 mV) due to a transient (∼5 sec) outward K+ current (∼50 pA). This current appears to be triggered by Ca2+ released from intracellular stores, based on the observation that it was also seen in cells bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium. In addition, pharmacological studies indicate that this current was dependent on phospholipase C (PLC) activation and was in part mediated by bicuculline methiodide and apamin-sensitive Ca2+-controlled K+ channels. The initial transient hyperpolarization was followed by a sustained depolarization (∼4 mV) due to an inward current (∼10 pA). This response was dependent on PLC-dependent activation of Na+/Ca2+ influx but did not involve nifedipine-sensitive voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Together, these results indicate for the first time that activation of α1B-adrenoreceptors initiates a PLC-dependent biphasic change in pinealocyte Vm characterized by an initial transient hyperpolarization mediated by a mixture of Ca2+-activated K+ channels followed by a sustained depolarization mediated by a Ca2+-conducting nonselective cation channel. These observations indicate that both continuous elevation of intracellular Ca2+ and sustained depolarization at approximately −40 mV are associated with and are likely to be required for activation of the pinealocyte.


The pineal gland is a neuroendocrine transducer, which generates a nocturnal increase in melatonin production, reflecting stimulation by norepinephrine (NE). This temporal pattern is controlled by the master circadian oscillator located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus; light acts on this system to block stimulation of the pineal gland and to reset the clock (13). NE is the primary physiological transmitter of the pineal gland (35) and acts via two adrenergic receptors that are highly expressed in this tissue: the Gq-coupled α1B-adrenergic receptors (6, 7) and the Gs-coupled β1-adrenergic receptors (8). The coincident activation of both receptors controls a large (∼100-fold) increase in cAMP. β1-Adrenergic activation causes an increase in adenylate cyclase activity through Gsα. This is potentiated by α1B-adrenoreceptor activation through a mechanism dependent on an increase in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and phospholipase C (PLC) activity, leading to activation of protein kinase C (6, 812). This results in activation of protein kinase A and phosphorylation of cAMP-response element-binding protein (3, 13).

As a consequence of this, expression of Aanat is induced. This gene encodes the enzyme responsible for large changes in melatonin production, arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (4). Induction of Aanat is further enhanced by the α1B-adrenoreceptor-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i (14). Protein kinase A activation not only induces Aanat expression but also results in AANAT phosphorylation. This triggers binding of phosphorylated AANAT to 14-3-3 protein, which stabilizes the enzyme and increases serotonin affinity (4), resulting in an increase in melatonin production. Melatonin is highly lipophilic, and because of this, the increase in melatonin production leads to an immediate increase in melatonin secretion.

The pineal gland is composed 95% of the melatonin synthesizing pinealocytes. These cells express numerous plasma membrane channels as revealed by electrophysiological studies, including voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) and voltage-gated Na+ (Nav) channels, two types of Ca2+-controlled K+ (KCa) channels, and at least two types of voltage-activated K+ channels (7, 1521). Rat pinealocytes fire action potentials (AP) spontaneously, with the firing rate being low during the day time and high during the night time (2225). The classic stimulus-secretion coupling, which controls release of compounds stored in secretory vesicles, is not known to significantly influence melatonin secretion, which, as indicated above, is regulated by production.

In some neuroendocrine cells (e.g. TSH-releasing hormone-stimulated pituitary lactotrophs), Ca2+ mobilization initiates a transient hyperpolarization due to activation of KCa channels, followed by a sustained depolarization that permits firing of AP and facilitation of Cav influx (26). Application of NE also induces hyperpolarization of the pinealocyte (2729) and stimulates K+ efflux, most probably through big potassium (BK) KCa channels, as identified in pinealocytes using single channel recording (21). Here, we have focused on the NE regulation of membrane potential (Vm), with the goal of determining the sustained effects of NE on Vm because of the importance that electrochemical gradients play in cell physiology. We also were interested in establishing the nature of currents mediating changes in Vm and the signaling pathways controlling these currents. To address these issues, we have studied isolated rat pinealocytes using amphotericin-perforated patch clamp recording (16, 30). This method is superior to those previously used to study pineal Vm, because it establishes better electrical continuity between the pipette buffer and cytoplasm without the loss of cytoplasmic molecules necessary for the maintenance of NE responsivity. The results of these studies are presented below.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Iberiotoxin (IBTX), tetrodotoxin citrate, apamin, 1-[(2-chlorophenyl)diphenylmethyl]-1H-pyrazole (TRAM 34), noradrenaline (NE), phenylepinephrine (PE), epinephrine, isoproterenol (ISOP), prazosin, 10,10-bis(4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone dihydrochloride (XE991), nifedipine, and bicuculline methiodide (BMI) were purchased from Tocris-Cookson (Bristol, UK); 1-[6-[[(17β)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (U73122), 1-[6-[[(17β)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-2,5-pyrrolidinedione (U73343), and all other chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Animals and preparation of cultured pinealocytes

Postpubertal Sprague Dawley rats obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY), which were kept for 7–14 d under a controlled 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. All experiments were approved by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Animals Care Committee. Pinealocytes from male and female rats (aged 7–9 wk) were prepared as previously described (15) with minor modifications. Pineal glands removed between 1000 and 1100 h, dissected free of adhering tissue, washed in ice-cold DMEM without serum (DMEM with high glucose; GIBCO-BRL, Grand Island, NY), incubated in papain (5 min at 37 C, Papain Dissociation System kit; Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ), and dissociated using gentle titration. Incubation in papain and titration were repeated five to six times to dissociate all cells. Papain inhibitor was added, and the cell preparation was transferred into DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (all from Life Technologies, Inc., Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), glutamine (1% Gluta MAX), L-ascorbic acid (0.1 μg/ml), 9-Cis retinoic acid (10−8 m), and triiodothyronie (10−8 m) (Sigma). Cells were filtered through nylon mesh (40-μm pores Cell Strainer; BD Falcon, San Jose, CA) and centrifuged (∼1000 × g for 5 min, room temperature). The resulting pellet was resuspended in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum. Approximately 150,000 cells were placed on coverslips coated with 1% poly-l-lysine solution (Sigma) in 35-mm culture dishes (BD Falcon) and maintained at 37 C in a 5% CO2-containing atmosphere until use (1–3 d).

Electrophysiological recordings

Vm and whole-cell currents were measured using the amphotericin-perforated patch-clamp technique at room temperature, as described previously (16, 30). Briefly, cells were continuously perfused with an extracellular solution containing: 150 mm NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 10 mm HEPES, and 10 mm glucose (pH was adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH). In some experiments, bath NaCl was replaced (1:1) by N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG+). In others, CaCl2 was omitted and 5 mm EGTA added to bath medium. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and polished by heat to a tip resistance of 5–7 mΩ. The pipette solution contained: 70 mm K-aspartate, 70 mm KCl, 3 mm MgCl2, and 10 mm HEPES (pH was adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). Before measurement, amphotericin B was added to the pipette solution from a stock solution (20 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide, always freshly prepared) to obtain a final concentration of 200 μg/ml. Recordings were performed 10 min after seal formation. The holding potential (HP) for NE-induced current recording was at −40 mV, if not otherwise stated. Current-clamp and voltage-clamp recordings were performed using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Data were captured and stored using the pClamp 10 software packages in conjunction with the Digidata 1322A A/D converter (Axon Instruments). The access resistance was monitored throughout each experiment. Only recordings with access resistances between 22 and 45 mΩ (average 28.3 ± 2.2 mΩ) were considered acceptable for analysis of NE-induced currents. Series resistance compensation was not used, and the corrections of Vm for the Donnan potential were ignored. All data have been corrected for liquid junction potential (9.7 mV, positive). Solutions were delivered to the recording chamber by a gravity-driven microperfusion system (ALA Scientific Instruments, Westbury, NY). The application tip was routinely positioned approximately 500 μm to the side and 50 μm above the recorded cell. Less than 200 msec was required for the exchange of solutions around the patched cells. To test effects of drugs, NE was usually applied three times to the same cell; time between each NE application was 3 min.

Data analysis

The NE-induced current amplitudes were measured using the Clampfit 10 software (Axon Instruments). Hyperpolarization was measured as the difference between Vm values immediately before initiation of agonist application and at the peak hyperpolarization response. Depolarization was measured as the difference between Vm values immediately before initiation of agonist application and at the peak depolarization response. All numerical values in the text are reported as mean ± sem. Significant differences between means were determined by a Student's t test; P values of at least <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Resting Vm and electrical excitability

All electrophysiological experiments were done on isolated pinealocytes cultured for 1–3 d. The resting Vm in these cells, as measured using amphotericin-perforated patch, was −46 ± 1 mV (n = 48), in agreement with published reports (28). Spontaneous electrical activity (2, 24, 25, 27) was observed in about 20% of these cells, usually after 2 or 3 d in culture (n = 9) (Fig. 1). Two patterns of spontaneous electrical activity were apparent (Fig. 1A, inset): single spiking lasting for 5.6 ± 1.4 msec and plateau bursting with longer duration (570 ± 210 msec). The amplitudes of these spikes were comparable (18 ± 3 mV), and both types of spiking were followed by after hyperpolarization (−5.6 ± 1.4 mV).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Electrophysiological properties of single pinealocytes. A, An example of the current-clamp trace with spontaneous electrical activity. The resting Vm was −45 mV. Note single spiking and plateau bursting AP presented on an expanded time scale. B and C, Examples of effects of replacing bath Na+ with NMDG+ on hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. The return of Na+ to the extracellular bath caused rapid recovery of the resting Vm and transient depolarization accompanied by initiation of electrical activity. In this and following figures, all traces were derived by the amphotericin-perforated patch clamp recording, and no current was injected. Horizontal bars indicate duration of Na+-free conditions.

When extracellular Na+ was substituted with NMDG+, a large organic cation, the resting Vm of pineal cells rapidly hyperpolarized (Fig. 1, B and C), reaching the value of −65 ± 2.3 mV (n = 15). The return of bath Na+ not only resulted in a recovery from hyperpolarization but also a transient depolarization, frequently accompanied by initiation of electrical activity. We observed cell-to-cell variation in the duration of the transient depolarization and that the length of the period of subsequent spontaneous firing of AP changed in parallel (Fig. 1, B vs. C).

In contrast, tetrodotoxin, a blocker of Nav channels, did not affect the resting Vm (data not shown). These results indicate that a large background Na+ conductance through channel(s) other than Nav contribute(s) to the resting Vm. Pinealocyte Vm is lower than in other neuroendocrine cells (50–70 mV) (26), thereby driving these pineal cells above threshold for sustained activation of a fraction of Cav channels.

Agonist-induced changes in Vm and current

The presence of functional adrenergic receptors was tested by a short (5–10 sec) application of NE in 101 cells. The majority of cells were electrically silent during NE application, AP were rarely observed. Current clamp recordings revealed that 1 μm NE application induced biphasic changes in resting Vm composed of a relatively rapid and transient hyperpolarization (−12.0 ± 2.4 mV) followed by a small depolarization (4.4 ± 0.5 mV) (Fig. 2A), which lasted as long as the agonist was present (Fig. 2C). This was observed with a delay of 2.3 ± 0.2 sec after application in 12 of 18 cells. The depolarization phase or both phases were not detected in six of the 18 cells recorded.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Characterization of NE-induced responses of single pinealocytes using current clamp and voltage clamp recording. A, Current clamp whole-cell recording of Vm from pinealocytes before, during, and after the application of 1 μm NE. B, Voltage clamp whole-cell recording of NE-evoked current (I) from the same pinealocyte shown in A after a 3-min washout period. Membrane currents were recorded from cells voltage-clamped at −40 mV. The dotted lines indicate the resting Vm level (A) and zero current level (B). Note the biphasic nature of voltage and current responses in A and B. C and D, Dependence of the response on duration of NE application. Both the depolarization (C) and inward current (D) persisted during entire NE application period (30 and 60 sec, respectively). E, Inhibition of sustained depolarization by prazosin, an α1B-adrenoceptor antagonist, in the presence of NE. Shaded area indicates duration of prazosin (1 μm) application. F, Epinephrine-induced biphasic response.

In 56 out of 83 cells (67%) clamped at HP of −40 mV, an NE-induced current was also observed to be comprised of two phases (Fig. 2B): an initial outward current (45 ± 8 pA; peak duration, 6.0 ± 1.1 sec) accompanied by a sustained inward current (−12 ± 1.5 pA; duration, 19 ± 4.8 sec). The inward current was also observed to persist in experiments with longer applications (60 sec) (Fig. 2D). After repetitive stimulation, the amplitude of the NE-induced response diminished and recovery was observed after a 2- to 5-min washing interval (data not shown). Inward or both outward and inward currents were not observed in 27 of the 83 cells studied.

These results reveal for the first time that the NE-induced hyperpolarization of the pinealocyte membrane (2729) is transient and that this is followed by a sustained depolarization.

α1B-Adrenergic receptors mediate NE actions on outward current

Concentration-dependence studies indicated that the threshold concentration for the NE-evoked outward current was 0.1 μm (Fig. 3A) and the EC50 value was approximately 1 μm. The identity of the adrenergic receptors involved in NE-dependent changes in Vm or current was examined pharmacologically. Treatment with the mixed agonist epinephrine (10 sec, 10 μm) and the α-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (10–20 sec, 1 μm) mimicked the effects of NE treatment (Figs. 2F and 3B). In addition, the effect of NE was abolished in cells bathed in medium containing the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist 1 μm prazosin, (Fig. 3C). However, the β1-adrenoreceptor agonist ISOP (1 μm) failed to trigger current response (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Role of α1B-adrenoceptors in NE-induced current responses. A, Effects of NE (0.1 and 1 μm) on biphasic current. B, NE (1 μm)- and PE (1 μm)-induced current responses and the lack of response to ISOP (1 μm) to stimulate any current response. C, Inhibition of NE-induced currents by prazosin (1 μm), an α1B-adrenoreceptor antagonist. In all panels, the same cells were stimulated three times. The washout period between agonist application was 3 min.

Furthermore, the sustained NE-induced cell depolarization was also abolished by treatment with 1 μm prazosin (Fig. 2E), indicating that this effect is mediated by an α1-adrenoreceptor. The specific subtype of α1-adrenoreceptor involved is assumed to be the α1B, because it is highly expressed in the rat pineal gland, and expression of other α-adrenergic receptors in this tissue is undetectable based on microarray analysis (7) and RNA-Seq (Klein, D. C., unpublished data).

The NE-induced current was absent in whole-cell recording with broken membrane (data not shown), which is consistent with the interpretation that the current changes observed in intact cells are mediated by a metabotropic-type receptor.

Role of Ca2+/PLC signaling in NE-induced hyperpolarization

The available evidence indicates that α1B-adrenoreceptors regulate Ca2+ levels and PLC activity in the pinealocytes, as discussed in the Introduction. This, combined with the findings that cAMP elevating agents, including ISOP (Fig. 3B.) and forskolin (Zemkova, H., unpublished data), do not alter Vm, directed our focus to the roles that Ca2+ and PLC play in mediating adrenergic changes in Vm.

The relevance of Ca2+ mobilization from endoplasmic reticulum on NE-induced changes in Vm was studied by measuring NE-stimulated currents in the presence and absence of extracellular Ca2+. Removal of extracellular Ca2+ had no effect on the amplitude of NE-induced outward current but reduced the amplitude of inward current by 55 ± 17% (Fig. 4A and Table 1). This establishes that Ca2+ influx is not essential for the transient hyperpolarization but clearly contributes to the second phase of the NE-induced response, consistent with evidence that NE causes a sustained and Ca2+ influx-dependent elevation of [Ca2+]i (6, 31).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Dependence of NE-induced biphasic currents on PLC signaling pathway. A, NE-induced biphasic current in pineal cells bathed in calcium-deficient medium. Shaded area indicates duration of calcium-deficient medium application. B and C, Inhibition of NE (1 μm)-induced current by 1-min pretreatment of cells with U73122 (1 μm), a PLC inhibitor (B), and the lack of inhibition when cells were treated for the same time with the inactive analog U73343 (1 μm) (C).

Table 1.

The effect of experimental treatments on the amplitude of the NE-induced current

Treatment Outward current (pA)
Inward current (pA)
NE before NE+ treatment NE after NE before NE+ treatment NE after
None (n = 10) 55 ± 16 49 ± 15 46 ± 18 −10 ± 2 −12 ± 2 −11 ± 2
200 nm apamin (n = 8) 56 ± 26 45 ± 18 38 ± 23 −16 ± 3 −17 ± 5 −19 ± 5
30 μm BMI (n = 4) 71 ± 25 29 ± 13, P = 0.028 53 ± 25 −10 ± 4 −11 ± 3 −9 ± 2
30 μm BMI+ 200 nm apamin (n = 3) 30 ± 12 13 ± 3, P = 0.030 26 ± 10 −12 ± 3 −17 ± 5 −19 ± 4
Ca2+-deficient media (n = 6) 33 ± 17 35 ± 13 18 ± 8 −15 ± 4 −6 ± 3, P = 0.011 −16 ± 3
100 nm IBTX (n = 3) 54 ± 24 49 ± 23 27 ± 12 −24 ± 11 −26 ± 9 −26 ± 6
1 μm NIF (n = 3) 19 ± 11 23 ± 10 17 ± 8 −13 ± 5 −14 ± 3 −14 ± 7
1 μm TRAM 34 (n = 4) 47 ± 7 46 ± 12 40 ± 8 −19 ± 4 −20 ± 8 −17 ± 10
1 μm U73343 n = 3) 38 ± 9 44 ± 10 47 ± 9 −13 ± 3 −15 ± 5 −12 ± 6
1 μm U73122 (n = 4) 51 ± 18 8 ± 5, P = 0.029 16 ± 11 −12 ± 4 −2 ± 1, P = 0.003 −6 ± 4
1 μm XE991 (n = 6) 36 ± 8 32 ± 11 31 ± 10 −6 ± 1 −10 ± 4 −9 ± 5

NE (1 μm) was applied three times, once in the presence of drug. Drugs were preapplied for 10–60 sec. Apamin and BMI, specific inhibitors of KCa2 channels; IBTX, specific inhibitor of KCa1.1 channels; TRAM 34, an inhibitor of IK KCa1 and KCa 3.1 channels; XE991, a KCNQ channel blocker; nifedipine (NIF), antagonist of l-type Cav channels; U73343, structural inactive analog of specific phospholipase C inhibitor; U73122, specific phospholipase C inhibitor. Analysis was performed on three to eight cells per treatment. Outward and inward peak current values were obtained approximately 10 and approximately 25 sec, respectively, after NE application. Data shown are mean ± sem, P values were estimated by a Student's t-test.

To further test the relevance of Ca2+ mobilization from intracellular stores on the NE-induced current response, we used the aminosteroid U73122, which specifically blocks PLC, the activity of which is elevated in the pineal gland by α1-adrenoreceptor activation (9, 11, 12). Pretreatment of pinealocytes with 1 μm U73122 for 60–120 sec almost completely abolished the NE-induced biphasic current (Fig. 4B). In contrast, the inactive analog U73343 had no effect (Fig. 4C and Table 1). This suggests that PLC is involved in NE-induced hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane by releasing Ca2+ stored in endoplasmic reticulum as well as the sustained depolarization by facilitating cation influx, a well described pattern of signaling for Ca2+-mobilizing G protein-coupled receptors (32).

KCa and nonselective cationic channels contribute to NE-induced biphasic currents

The dependence of NE-evoked outward current on Ca2+ mobilization from intracellular stores is consistent with a role of KCa channels in hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane of pinealocytes. If so, the amplitude of the current should depend on the Vm. To test this, cells were clamped at different potential, and the amplitude of outward current was measured. Figure 5A shows that the amplitude of NE-induced outward current decreased at HP negative to −40 mV. The estimated reversal potential for this current was −91 ± 5 mV (n = 3), near to the calculated reversal potential for K+ (Fig. 5B). These results confirm that KCa channels account for NE-induced hyperpolarization of the cell membrane.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Voltage dependence of NE-induced outward current. A, Effect of the HP on the amplitude of NE (1 μm)-induced current responses in pineal cells. Notice that the maximum amplitude of NE-induced current decreased at negative HP. B, The reversal potential (Erev) of NE-induced rapid current (I) of −91 ± 5 mV.

The KCa channels are composed of two families. One includes three small potassium (SK) channels (KCa2.1, KCa2.2, and KCa2.3) and one intermediate conductance (IK) channel (KCa3.1). The BK-type channels represent the other family of KCa channels only distantly related to SK and IK channels (KCa1.1, KCa4.1, and KCa5.1) (26). The nature of the channel or channels involved in NE-mediated hyperpolarization was examined using selective KCa channel blockers under voltage-clamp conditions. At Vm −40 mV, BMI (30 μm), the KCa2 blocker, rapidly and reversibly blocked NE-evoked outward current by 59 ± 18% (Table 1 and Fig. 6A). The apamin-sensitive component of inward current was also identified (Fig. 6B and Table 1). The NE-induced current was insensitive to IBTX, a specific inhibitor for KCa1.1 channels, TRAM 34, a blocker of KCa1 and KCa3.1, and the potassium voltage-gated and cyclic nucleotide-regulated channel, subfamily Q, member 7 (Kv7/KCNQ) inhibitor XE991 (Table 1).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Characterization of NE-induced outward current. A and B, Inhibition of NE-induced current by KCa channel blockers. A, Effects of BMI (30 μm), a KCa2 channels blocker, on NE-induced outward current. B, Effects of apamin (200 nm), a SK-KCa channel blocker, on NE-induced current response. C, Independence of NE-induced outward current of Ca2+ influx through nifedipine (NIF)-sensitive L-type Cav channels.

Nifedipine (1 μm), an L-type Cav channel antagonist, had no effect on NE-stimulated outward and inward currents (Fig. 6C and Table 1), suggesting that Ca2+ influx through these channels is not critical for a transient hyperpolarization and sustained plasma membrane depolarization. This is in contrast to the role these channels play in spontaneous firing of AP and the accompanied Ca2+ influx. Because the sustained depolarization was abolished in cells bathed in Na+-deficient medium (data not shown) and partially inhibited by removal of bath Ca2+ (Table 1), these results indicate that the inward current is mediated by one or more nonselective cationic channels.

Discussion

In this study, the electrophysiological properties of single pinealocytes have been examined using amphotericin B-perforated patch clamp recording. The enhanced sensitivity and responsivity to NE of the technique has provided us with new insights into the electrical characteristics of these cells as discussed below.

Spontaneous electrical activity in resting cells

Consistent with published in vivo and in vitro studies (2, 24, 25, 27), we observed that pineal cells spontaneously fire AP. Firing of AP requires the expression of several subtypes of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing channels. Chicken pinealocytes express the depolarizing Nav channels (17), but it is unlikely that they play a role in spontaneous electrical activity. First, the resting Vm in these cells is more depolarized than in other cell neuroendocrine types, approximately −36 to −46 mV in recordings by several groups (28, 33, 34), values at which the majority of these channels are inactivated. Second, tetrodotoxin, a blocker of Nav channels, does not abolish spontaneous firing of AP in rat pinealocytes (27), suggesting a role of Cav channels in spike depolarization. Consistent with this hypothesis, it has been reported that rat and chicken pineal cells express L-, P/Q, and N-type Cav channels (17, 18, 35, 36). Unpublished RNA transcriptome profiling by RNA-Seq indicates that relative expression of mRNA encoding these channels in rat pinealocytes is L-type > T-type ≫ P/Q-type and ≈ R-type channels (Klein, D. C., unpublished data). The L-type Cav channels in pinealocytes are also subject of regulation by phosphorylation (20, 35, 37). Pinealocytes also express several K+ channels, activation of which is needed to restore the resting Vm (19, 38). We found that rapid depolarization (removal of Na+-free solution) was able to increase the frequency of AP, but no effect was observed after NE application. This may be explained by the participation of ion channels, which are involved in generation of AP that are not directly regulated by α1B-drenoreceptor signaling. Alternatively, a low resting Vm and a slow onset of depolarization evoked by NE (see below) may have inactivated voltage-gated channels before firing of AP could start. Further experiments are needed to distinguish between these two possibilities and to explore the role of NE in electrical excitability of pinealocytes.

The low resting Vm is of potential physiological relevance, because it permits steady-state Ca2+ influx through nondesensitizing Cav channels in nonfiring cells. Our results also indicate that high resting Na+ conductance accounts at least partially for elevated resting Vm of pineal cells, as is also seen in secretory pituitary cells, where removal of bath Na+ has a hyperpolarizing effect (39). At the present time, it is unknown whether ion channel(s) or transport mechanism(s) are responsible for such constitutive active Na+ conductance, referred to as “the background Na+ conductance” (40).

α1B-Adrenergic receptor-induced biphasic change in Vm

Activation of the pineal α1B-adrenoreceptor facilitates a transient Ca2+ release from intracellular pools and a spike in [Ca2+]i. After this, there is a sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i dependent upon Ca2+ influx (6, 10, 31, 33, 41). Furthermore, the NE-induced Ca2+ influx was not found to be blocked by 1 μm nifedipine, arguing against the role of L-type Cav channels. In our hands, a short application of NE (10–20 sec, 1 or 10 μm) elicited a transient and robust outward current, which in current clamp recording could be seen as a transient hyperpolarization, followed by a smaller inward current, which could be seen as a sustained depolarization (Fig. 7). We also found that both NE-induced currents were inhibited by prazosin and mimicked by phenylephrine and epinephrine, but not by ISOP, which indicates that the NE-induced biphasic response is mediated by α1B-adrenoreceptors. The observation that similar responses were observed with PE, epinephrine, and NE, but not by ISOP, suggests that the NE-induced changes in Vm described here are purely α1B-adrenergic.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Schematic representation of α1B-adrenoceptor actions in pinealocytes. Phase I, top to bottom, Addition of NE (horizontal bar) induced a rapid and sustained PLC activation, leading to generation of inositol trisphophate (IP3) (top panel) and diacylglycerol (data not shown). The released IP3 activates its receptors, causing Ca2+ mobilization from endoplasmic reticulum (second panel from top), activation of KCa channels (third panel), KCa-dependent hyperpolarization of cell membrane (fifth panel), and inhibition of Ca2+ influx through Cav channels (second panel from bottom panel). Phase II, top to bottom, The sustained PLC signaling leads to activation of nonselective cationic channels (fourth panel), causing sustained cell membrane depolarization (fifth panel). The permeability of these channels to Ca2+ accounts for the sustained rise in [Ca2+]i (second panel from bottom), and the transient Ca2+ mobilization accompanied with sustained Ca2+ influx accounts for the biphasic Ca2+ signals (bottom panel).

The NE (ED50 ∼ 1 μm)-induced outward current was also seen in cells bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium, indicating that Ca2+ mobilization from an intracellular pool generates the hyperpolarizing current. This current had reversal potentials close to the K+ equilibrium potential, indicating that the NE-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular pool activates KCa channels, consistent with previous reports (21, 33). Our pharmacological studies suggest SK-type channels sensitive to BMI and apamin contribute 60% to Ca2+-dependent hyperpolarization. In contrast, our pharmacological studies with TRAM 34, a highly selective blocker of IK Ca2+-activated K+ channels, and XE991, a selective inhibitor of Kv7/KCNQ channels (42), fail to provide evidence that these channels contribute to the NE-induced outward current (Table 1).

The finding that the NE-induced outward current was blocked by a selective inhibitor of PLC indicates that activation of this enzyme is required for Ca2+ mobilization, as has been widely observed in other systems. It is of interest to note that pineal PLC is sensitive to Ca2+ within the physiological range of this cation (11). As a result, it seems likely that the initial receptor-dependent activation of PLC results in immediate positive feedback via Ca2+, which contributes to sustained activation of this enzyme.

Previous single channel recordings revealed the presence of the BK-type KCa channels in pineal cells activated by NE (21), which are blockable by scorpion toxin (21) and tetraethylammonium (17). It was also claimed that these channels are activated by NE-induced Ca2+ influx (33). Consistent with this, we found that the transient NE-induced KCa current was insensitive to IBTX, indicating that Ca2+ released from intracellular stores cannot activate BK channels. Similarly, pituitary cells express both BK and SK channels, and Ca2+ mobilization activates SK channels, whereas BK channels are activated by Ca2+ influx (26).

As observed with the NE-induced hyperpolarization, the sustained depolarizing current did not develop when PLC was inhibited, supporting the interpretation that PLC activity regulates both Ca2+ mobilization and the sustained Ca2+ influx current. The inward current was significantly attenuated by removal of bath Ca2+, suggesting that Ca2+ mobilization is linked to the sustained Ca2+ influx. The nature of this link is not clear. In general, in nonexcitable cells, Ca2+ mobilization is coupled to Ca2+ influx through Orai channels by STIM proteins in endoplasmic reticulum, a process referred to as “capacitative calcium entry” through store-operated Ca2+ channels (43, 44). In pinealocytes, store-operated Ca2+ channels have been suggested to account for the NE-induced rise in [Ca2+]i (33). However, it is unlikely that these channels account for sustained depolarization, because Orai channels are highly selective for Ca2+, whereas in our hands, the sustained depolarization and inward current were only partially abolished by removal of bath Ca2+. This suggests that a depolarizing channel is probably permeable to both Na+ and Ca2+. This is similar to the role that NE-activated depolarizing nonselective cation channels play in controlling Ca2+ influx (16). Furthermore, it is now well established that TRPC, transient receptor potential classic channel, can be activated via Ca2+-mobilizing receptors via a PLC mechanism and that these channels conduct both Na+ and Ca2+ (45). It is of interest to note that the gene encoding the scafolding Trpc4, transient receptor potential classic channel member 4, associated protein is highly expressed in the pineal gland, relative to other channel proteins (Klein, D. C., unpublished data); this protein might play a critical role in controlling the inward current.

As indicated above, previous studies have reported an adrenergically generated hyperpolarization in the rat pineal gland. However, none have indicated that this is transient in nature nor that it is followed by depolarization. The failure of previous investigations to observe depolarization may reflect technical differences in recording methods, which precluded detection. In our study, the biphasic response was observed in 67% of voltage-clamped cells. The failure to observe this pattern consistently is likely to reflect variable experimental conditions beyond our control, cell preparation-induced decrease in the receptor or channel levels, or natural variations in the expression of receptors or channels. Consistent with this is the finding that there is significant cell-to-cell variation in the amplitude of the biphasic calcium response of rat pinealocytes to NE (15). In addition, observations made on single isolated pinealocytes used in the current studies may differ from those made using the intact gland because cell-cell communication through gap junctions (46) might influence observed electrophysiological changes. Cell-cell communication, combined with the influence of extracellular space retention of ions within the cultured intact gland, could buffer electrophysiological responses of single cells and delay depolarization (28, 29). Depolarization was also observed in studies performed in cultured pineal organs of guinea pigs (47).

Vm and pinealocyte biology

Our findings make it clear that adrenergic activation of the pinealocyte produces prolonged depolarization, leading to the conclusion that this is necessary for ideal adrenergic activation of the pinealocyte. However, the evidence of a prolonged depolarization puts in question the view that sustained hyperpolarization, not depolarization, is required for the hours long stimulation of AANAT (28, 48). This view was based on the finding that experimental depolarizing treatments (ouabain, ED50 ∼ 0.25 μm; K+, ED50 ∼ 35 mm) block NE and cAMP stimulation of this response (28, 48). One explanation for these effects is that these experimental depolarization treatments may overwhelm the capacity of the pinealocyte to maintain a level of physiology required to generate the AANAT response.

A related issue is the physiological relevance of the sustained depolarization, in addition to the associated elevation of [Ca2+]i, which would appear to reflect signaling. One can consider that the Vm maintained by adrenergic activation of the pinealocyte is broadly related to cell physiology through solute transport, which is mediated by panoply of solute transporters. The dependence of transporter function on Vm is consistent with the view that the sustained depolarization produced by NE establishes ideal electrochemical conditions allowing pinealocyte transporters to operate in an optimally integrated manner in support of cellular metabolism.

Another issue of interest is the functional significance of the initial transient hyperpolarization. One possible explanation is that this blocks Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated channels, thereby making it easier for Ca2+ pumps to control [Ca2+]i.

Summary

The results of the studies presented here indicate that there is a Ca2+ signaling pathway operative in rat pinealocytes controlled by α1B-adrenoreceptors, the activation of which causes two sequential changes in several plasma membrane and intracellular events (labeled in Fig. 7 as I and II). These receptors stimulate PLC, leading to an increase in inositol trisphosphate production and Ca2+ mobilization, as well as an increase in diacylglycerol production and activation of protein kinase C. Calcium mobilization in turn activates a mixture of KCa channels expressed in these cells. A substantial part of this current passes through SK channels that have been identified here for the first time as novel effectors for NE receptors in pinealocytes. Ca2+ influx through Cav channels is silenced due to cell membrane hyperpolarization. Mobilization rapidly depletes intracellular Ca2+ stores, thereby terminating the activity of KCa channels. During sustained NE application, there is a PLC-dependent activation of nonselective cation channels, permitting Ca2+ influx, resulting in membrane depolarization. Enhanced Ca2+ influx accounts for a sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i, which serves to enhance adrenergic activation of PLC and to facilitate the increase in arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase activity and melatonin production.

A feature of this scenario is that Ca2+ from intracellular stores regulates SK type of KCa channels, whereas Ca2+ from influx does not, as has been established for these channels in other systems (49), apparently reflecting differences in localization/compartmentalization of SK and BK channels and in sensitivity to Ca2+. The sustained PLC activity, as indicated by the plateau in inositol trisphosphate production in Fig. 7, top panel (II), is thought to activate several canonical transient receptor potential channels as seen in other systems. Diacylglycerol may play a role in this process (45). Future studies should clarify whether this is the case with NE-stimulated pinealocytes, thereby expanding our knowledge of the central role that PLC and Ca2+ play in mediating adrenergic activation of these cells.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funds from the Intramural Research Program of The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, and by a Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Grant 305/07/0681). This work was done while H.Z. was a Guest Researcher in The Section on Neuroendocrinology, Program on Developmental Endocrinology and Genetics, The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD).

Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Footnotes

Abbreviations:
AP
Action potential
BK
big potassium
BMI
bicuculline methiodide
[Ca2+]i
intracellular calcium concentration
Cav
voltage-gated Ca2+
HP
holding potential
IBTX
iberiotoxin
IK
intermediate conductance
IP3
inositol trisphosphate
ISOP
isoproterenol
KCa
Ca2+-controlled K+
Nav
voltage-gated Na+
IK
intermediate potassium
Kv7/KCNQ
potassium voltage-gated and cyclic nucleotide-regulated channel, subfamily Q, member 7
NE
norepinephrine
NMDG+
N-methyl-D-glucamine
PE
phenylepinephrine
PLC
phospholipase C
SK
small potassium
TRAM 34
1-[(2-chlorophenyl)diphenylmethyl]-1H-pyrazole
U73122
1-[6-[[(17β)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione
U73343
1-[6-[[(17β)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-2,5-pyrrolidinedione
Vm
membrane potential
XE991
10,10-bis(4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone dihydrochloride.

References

  • 1. Harrison NL, Zatz M. 1989. Voltage-dependent calcium channels regulate melatonin output from cultured chick pineal cells. J Neurosci 9:2462–2467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reuss S, Vollrath L. 1984. Electrophysiological properties of rat pinealocytes: evidence for circadian and ultradian rhythms. Exp Brain Res 55:455–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Klein DC. 1985. Photoneural regulation of the mammalian pineal gland. Ciba Found Symp 117:38–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Klein DC. 2007. Arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase: “the Timezyme.” J Biol Chem 282:4233–4237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kappers JA. 1960. The development, topographical relations and innervation of the epiphysis cerebri in the albino rat. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 52:163–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sugden LA, Sugden D, Klein DC. 1987. α 1-adrenoceptor activation elevates cytosolic calcium in rat pinealocytes by increasing net influx. J Biol Chem 262:741–745 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bailey MJ, Coon SL, Carter DA, Humphries A, Kim JS, Shi Q, Gaildrat P, Morin F, Ganguly S, Hogenesch JB, Weller JL, Rath MF, Møller M, Baler R, Sugden D, Rangel ZG, Munson PJ, Klein DC. 2009. Night/day changes in pineal expression of >600 genes: central role of adrenergic/cAMP signaling. J Biol Chem 284:7606–7622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vanecek J, Sugden D, Weller J, Klein DC. 1985. Atypical synergistic α 1- and β-adrenergic regulation of adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate and guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate in rat pinealocytes. Endocrinology 116:2167–2173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Berg GR, Klein DC. 1972. Norepinephrine increases the (32P)labelling of a specific phospholipid frac tion of post-synaptic pineal membranes. J Neurochem 19:2519–2532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sugden D, Vanecek J, Klein DC, Thomas TP, Anderson WB. 1985. Activation of protein kinase C potentiates isoprenaline-induced cyclic AMP accumulation in rat pinealocytes. Nature 314:359–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ho AK, Chik CL, Klein DC. 1988. Permissive role of calcium in α 1-adrenergic stimulation of pineal phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase (phospholipase C) activity. J Pineal Res 5:553–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ho AK, Klein DC. 1987. Activation of α 1-adrenoceptors, protein kinase C, or treatment with intracellular free Ca2+ elevating agents increases pineal phospholipase A2 activity. Evidence that protein kinase C may participate in Ca2+-dependent α 1-adrenergic stimulation of pineal phospholipase A2 activity. J Biol Chem 262:11764–11770 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Klein D, Weller JL. 1973. Adrenergic-adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate regulation of serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity and the temporal relationship of serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity synthesis of 3H-N-acetylserotonin and 3H-melatonin in the cultured rat pineal gland. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 186:516–527 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yu L, Schaad NC, Klein DC. 1993. Calcium potentiates cyclic AMP stimulation of pineal arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase. J Neurochem 60:1436–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schaad NC, Parfitt A, Russell JT, Schaffner AE, Korf HW, Klein DC. 1993. Single-cell [Ca2+]i analysis and biochemical characterization of pinealocytes immobilized with novel attachment peptide preparation. Brain Res 614:251–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Darvish N, Russell JT. 1998. Neurotransmitter-induced novel modulation of a nonselective cation channel by a cAMP-dependent mechanism in rat pineal cells. J Neurophysiol 79:2546–2556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Henderson D, Dryer SE. 1992. Voltage- and Ca(2+)-activated ionic currents in acutely dissociated cells of the chick pineal gland. Brain Res 572:182–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Afeche SC, Barbosa R, Scialfa JH, Terra IM, Cassola AC, Cipolla-Neto J. 2006. Effects of the blockade of high voltage-activated calcium channels on in vitro pineal melatonin synthesis. Cell Biochem Funct 24:499–505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Castellano A, López-Barneo J, Armstrong CM. 1989. Potassium currents in dissociated cells of the rat pineal gland. Pflugers Arch 413:644–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chik CL, Li B, Karpinski E, Ho AK. 1999. Regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channel current in rat pinealocytes: role of basal phosphorylation. J Neurochem 72:73–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ceña V, Halperin JI, Yeandle S, Klein DC. 1991. Norepinephrine stimulates potassium efflux from pinealocytes: evidence for involvement of biochemical “AND” gate operated by calcium and adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate. Endocrinology 128:559–569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Reuss S, Semm P, Vollrath L. 1985. Changes in the electrical activity of the rat pineal gland following stimulation of the cervical sympathetic ganglia. J Auton Nerv Syst 12:281–288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Semm P, Demaine C, Vollrath L. 1981. Electrical responses of pineal cells to melatonin and putative transmitters. Evidence for circadian changes in sensitivity. Exp Brain Res 43:361–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Schenda J, Vollrath L. 1998. Demonstration of action-potential-producing cells in the rat pineal gland in vitro and their regulation by norepinephrine and nitric oxide. J Comp Physiol A 183:573–581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Schenda J, Vollrath L. 1999. An intrinsic neuronal-like network in the rat pineal gland. Brain Res 823:231–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Stojilkovic SS, Tabak J, Bertram R. 2010. Ion channels and signaling in the pituitary gland. Endocr Rev 31:845–915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Freschi JE, Parfitt AG. 1986. Intracellular recordings from pineal cells in tissue culture: membrane properties and response to norepinephrine. Brain Res 368:366–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Parfitt A, Weller JL, Klein DC, Sakai KK, Marks BH. 1975. Blockade by ouabain or elevated potassium ion concentration of the adrenergic and adenosine cyclic 3′,5′-monophosphate-induced stimulation of pineal serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity. Mol Pharmacol 11:241–255 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sakai KK, Marks BH. 1972. Adrenergic effects on pineal cell membrane potential. Life Sci I 11:285–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Horn R, Marty A. 1988. Muscarinic activation of ionic currents measured by a new whole-cell recording method. J Gen Physiol 92:145–159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schomerus C, Laedtke E, Korf HW. 1995. Calcium responses of isolated, immunocytochemically identified rat pinealocytes to noradrenergic, cholinergic and vasopressinergic stimulations. Neurochem Int 27:163–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Berridge MJ. 2009. Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1793:933–940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lee SY, Choi BH, Hur EM, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Lee CO, Kim KT. 2006. Norepinephrine activates store-operated Ca2+ entry coupled to large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels in rat pinealocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1060–C1066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Letz B, Schomerus C, Maronde E, Korf HW, Korbmacher C. 1997. Stimulation of a nicotinic ACh receptor causes depolarization and activation of L-type Ca2+ channels in rat pinealocytes. J Physiol 499(Pt 2):329–340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chik CL, Liu QY, Li B, Klein DC, Zylka M, Kim DS, Chin H, Karpinski E, Ho AK. 1997. α 1D L-type Ca(2+)-channel currents: inhibition by a β-adrenergic agonist and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in rat pinealocytes. J Neurochem 68:1078–1087 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Chin H, Smith MA, Kim HL, Kim H. 1992. Expression of dihydropyridine-sensitive brain calcium channels in the rat central nervous system. FEBS Lett 299:69–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chik CL, Liu QY, Li B, Karpinski E, Ho AK. 1995. cGMP inhibits L-type Ca2+ channel currents through protein phosphorylation in rat pinealocytes. J Neurosci 15:3104–3109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Poling JS, Karanian JW, Salem N, Jr, Vicini S. 1995. Time- and voltage-dependent block of delayed rectifier potassium channels by docosahexaenoic acid. Mol Pharmacol 47:381–390 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kucka M, Kretschmannova K, Murano T, Wu CP, Zemkova H, Ambudkar SV, Stojilkovic SS. 2010. Dependence of multidrug resistance protein-mediated cyclic nucleotide efflux on the background sodium conductance. Mol Pharmacol 77:270–279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sankaranarayanan S, Simasko SM. 1996. A role for a background sodium current in spontaneous action potentials and secretion from rat lactotrophs. Am J Physiol 271:C1927–C1934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Schaad NC, Vanecek J, Rodriguez IR, Klein DC, Holtzclaw L, Russell JT. 1995. Vasoactive intestinal peptide elevates pinealocyte intracellular calcium concentrations by enhancing influx: evidence for involvement of a cyclic GMP-dependent mechanism. Mol Pharmacol 47:923–933 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yue C, Yaari Y. 2004. KCNQ/M channels control spike afterdepolarization and burst generation in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 24:4614–4624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Putney JW. 2009. Capacitative calcium entry: from concept to molecules. Immunol Rev 231:10–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Smyth JT, Hwang SY, Tomita T, DeHaven WI, Mercer JC, Putney JW. 2010. Activation and regulation of store-operated calcium entry. J Cell Mol Med 14:2337–2349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Clapham DE, Julius D, Montell C, Schultz G. 2005. International union of pharmacology. XLIX. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of transient receptor potential channels. Pharmacol Rev 57:427–450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sáez JC, Berthoud VM, Kadle R, Traub O, Nicholson BJ, Bennett MV, Dermietzel R. 1991. Pinealocytes in rats: connexin identification and increase in coupling caused by norepinephrine. Brain Res 568:265–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Parkington HC, McCance I, Coleman HA. 1987. Two types of cells with central innervation in pineal gland of guinea pigs. Am J Physiol 252:C369–C377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ceña V, González-García C, Svoboda P, Weller JL, Klein DC. 1987. Developmental study of ouabain inhibition of adrenergic induction of rat pineal serotonin N-acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.87). J Biol Chem 262:14467–14471 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Stojilkovic SS, Zemkova H, Van Goor F. 2005. Biophysical basis of pituitary cell type-specific Ca2+ signaling-secretion coupling. Trends Endocrinol Metab 16:152–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES