Skip to main content
Cells, Tissues, Organs logoLink to Cells, Tissues, Organs
. 2011 May 13;194(2-4):326–330. doi: 10.1159/000324831

Phenotypic and Differentiation Stability of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Osteoblasts

Premjit Arpornmaeklong a,b, Michael J Pressler b, Paul H Krebsbach b,*
PMCID: PMC3178096  PMID: 21576915

Abstract

Purpose

To ensure the efficiency and safety of transplanted human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived osteoblast-like cells (hESC-OS) for bone regeneration, this study was designed to determine the effects of continuous cell expansion on the osteoblastic differentiation stability, pluripotency, and tumorigenic potential of long-term expanded hESC-OS.

Methods

hESCs manually harvested as cell aggregates or enzymatically dissociated as single cells were directly incubated in osteogenic medium and serially passaged to passage 25. Expression of osteoblast-related genes, pluripotent regulator genes, and genes related to tumorigenesis were examined at the primary passage and every 5 passages thereafter. hESC-OS were subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice for 4–24 weeks to test for teratoma formation. hESC-OS were recultivated in hESC culture conditions to evaluate the extent to which reverse differentiation back to the undifferentiated stage may occur.

Results

hESC-OS derived from hESC aggregates and dissociated cells exhibited comparable osteoblast differentiation patterns. Expression levels of osteoblast-related genes reached plateau levels at passages 5–10 before declining in higher passages. Expression of tumor-associated genes was not significantly increased. Only hESC-OS at primary and first passages formed teratomas after 4 weeks in vivo. The hESC-OS were not able to revert to hESCs.

Conclusions

Expanded hESC-OS demonstrated lineage-specific differentiation stability, did not maintain the pluripotency of hES cells, and were genetically stable. Thus, hESC-OS may be considered for large animal preclinical studies.

Key Words: Human embryonic stem cells, Osteoblastic differentiation, Tumorigenesis, Transdifferentiation

Introduction

To generate the number of osteogenic cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) required for cell-based regeneration, a number of challenges must be overcome. Among these challenges is the necessity to prolong the expansion of the differentiated cells before transplantation and to ensure transplantation of homogenous and lineage-restricted cells.

Long-term in vitro cultures of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and osteoprogenitor cells are associated with reduced proliferative and differentiation potential due to cellular senescence [Bruder et al., 1997; Kim et al., 2009]. Furthermore, some reports have indicated that long-term culture may cause a spontaneous transformation of hMSCs [Rubio et al., 2005; Rosland et al., 2009]. This transformation potential is amplified when the differentiated cells are derived from pluripotent cells such as hES cells that are known to have a high capacity to form teratomas in vivo [Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006].

Therefore, to ensure the efficiency and safety of hESC-derived osteoblast-like cells (hESC-OS), the goals of this study were: (1) to determine the effects of continuous cell expansion on osteoblastic differentiation stability and (2) to examine the pluripotency and tumorigenic potential of long-term expanded hESC-OS.

Materials and Methods

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Culture and Osteogenic Induction

Undifferentiated hESCs (BG01; Bresagen, Inc., USA) (passages 35–50) as (1) a suspension of single cells or (2) cell aggregates were regularly passaged in osteogenic medium as described [Arpornmaeklonget al., 2010]. A karyotype analysis was performed by cytogenetic analysis on 20 G-banded metaphase cells of hESCs-OS at passages 5, 10, 17, and 20 (Cell Line Genetics, USA).

Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on hESCs and hESC-OS at the primary passage and every 5 passages thereafter as described [Arpornmaeklong et al., 2010]. The genes and primers used are listed in table 1.

Table 1.

List of primers used in the qRT-PCR analysis

Names/symbols Gene description Catalog numbers
ALPL alkaline phosphatase, liver/bone/kidney Hs01029141_g1
Beta-actin (ACTB) human ACTB (actin, beta) endogenous control 4333762T
hRas v-Ha-ras Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog Hs00610483_m1
Myc (c-Myc) v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog Hs99999003_m1
Nanog Nanog homeobox Hs02387400_g1
Oct4 (POU5F1) POU class 5 homeobox 1 Hs03005111_g1
Osteocalcin (BGLAP) bone gamma-carboxyglutamate (gla) protein Hs01587814_g1
Runx2 Runt-related transcription factor 2 Hs00231692_m1
SNRPE (bRaf) small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E Hs01635040_s1
Sox2 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box Hs01053049_s1

Reversion of Differentiation

hESC-OS at passages 1, 5, and 10 were seeded in 6-well culture plates (5 × 103 cells/cm2) and incubated for 21 days in hESC medium, human fetal fibroblast condition medium (Stemcell Technologies, Canada) on a Matrigel- (BD Biosciences, USA) coated surface for hESC culture, and osteogenic mediums (as described in the previous section) on a cell culture plate surface for differentiation culture. Cell morphology and undifferentiated cell colony formation were observed at the time of cell culture change. On day 21, hESC-OS were collected for expression of pluripotency related genes Oct4, Nanog, Sox2, and Lin28 (table 1) using qRT-PCR analysis [Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006].

Preparation of Composite Scaffolds and Subcutaneous Transplantation

All procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Committee on the Use and Care of Animals. On culture days 6 and 7, undifferentiated hESCs (BGO1) at passages 50–60 were dissociated and hESC-OS at passages 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 were trypsinized. Cell- (2 × 106 cells/pellet) gelatin sponge- (7 × 3 mm; Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., USA) fibrin gel [40 mg/ml fibrinogen with 200 units/ml human thrombin (Sigma, USA)] composite scaffolds were prepared as described [Arpornmaeklong et al., 2010]. Six composite scaffolds were prepared for the transplantation of hESCs at passages 50–60 and hESC-OS at passage 1. A total of 18 composite scaffolds were prepared for the transplantation of dissociates and aggregates of hESC-OS at passages 5–25. Composite scaffolds were subcutaneously transplanted in 30 immunocompromised mice (N:NIHbg-nu-xid; Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind., USA), with 4 pockets in 1 mouse and 1 sample in 1 pocket. Each pocket on 1 animal contained a composite scaffold with cells from different passages. The transplants were harvested 4, 12, and 24 weeks after transplantation. Histological sections were examined for tumor formation [Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006].

Statistical Analysis

Results were derived from 3 strains each of hESCs cultured as dissociated cells and cell aggregates. Data were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at p < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

The decrease in osteoblastic differentiation potential after the extensive expansion of hESC-OS in vitro (fig. 1a-c) is similar to those of osteoblast-like cells derived from hBMSCs [Bruder et al., 1997] and hMSCs [Kim et al., 2009] in aging or presenescent stages.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

hESC-OS showed osteogenic differentiation potential and genotypic stability by exhibiting an absence of spontaneous tumorigenic differentiation. Expression profiles of osteoblast-related genes (n = 3) (a–c) and oncogenes (d–f) over 20 cell passages in osteogenic medium (n = 3). g–i Decrease in the expression levels of pluripotency regulator genes at passages 5 and 10 following a reverse differentiation study (n = 6). g Oct4. h Nanog. i Sox2. ∗ = Significant differences between groups at the same passages; ‡ = lower levels than passage 10; ++ = significantly lower levels than the primary passage (passage 0); + = highest expression levels (mean ± SEM, p < 0.05).

Tumorigenic transformation of the differentiated cells is another major concern for safe clinical application when using differentiated cells derived from stem cells. Transformed mesenchymal stem cells have a significantly increased proliferation rate, altered morphology and phenotype, and form tumors in vivo [Rubio et al., 2005; Rosland et al., 2009]. In the current study, the phenotypic and genotypic stability of hESC-OS in long-term expansion was indicated by the consistent absence of chromosomal abnormalities of hESC-OS at passages 5–25 revealed by normal karyotypes (data not shown), decreased expression levels of oncogenes (fig. 1d-f), the lack of dedifferentiation (fig. 1g-i), and the absence of tumor formation after long-term transplantation (fig. 2). Moreover, an absence of undifferentiated colonies in the reversion-of-differentiation study further supported a lack of pluripotent cells and lack of undifferentiated cells in the hESC-OS (data not show) [Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Absence of tumorigenicity and undifferentiated cells from long-term transplanted hESC-OS. Transplantation of hESCs (a–c) and hESC-OS (d–f) at passage 1 for 4 weeks and a representative of expanded hESC-OS (g–i) at passage 10 for 24 weeks. The insets indicate selected regions of interest. The magnified images from the selected regions of interest are shown in the subsequent images (c, f, i). a Solid tumor from transplanted hESCs. b, c Histology of solid tumor revealing predominantly ductal tissue from the endodermal lineage, ductal tissue (arrow), and cartilage (arrowhead). d Cystic lesion containing clear fluid from the transplantation of hESC-OS at passage 1. e Revealing cystic lesion with multiple compartments of thin fibrous tissue wall (arrow) and remnants of the gelatin sponge (∗). f Cystic wall comprised of collagenous stroma (∗∗), blood vessel (arrow) and epithelium cells (arrowhead). g Remnant of an hESC-OS-gelatin sponge construct 24 weeks after transplantation. h Approximate margins (arrows) of a remnant gelatin sponge (∗) embedded in host connective and fat tissues. i Gelatin sponge (∗) infiltrated with connective tissue (arrowheads) with no evidence of teratoma formation 24 weeks after transplantation.

The absence of tumor formation from long-term transplantation of expanded hESC-OS up to passage 25 further substantiated genomic stability and the absence of undifferentiated cells in the expanded hESC-OS population. Solid tumor and cystic lesion formation were found 4–6 weeks after transplantation in all samples of hESCs (fig. 2a-c) and hESC-OS at passage 1, respectively (fig. 2d-f). All expanded hESC-OS at passages 5 and higher (10, 15, 20 and 25) did not form teratomas even after 6 months in vivo. Sixth months after implantation, the transplants were extensively resorbed and residual scaffolds were infiltrated with connective tissue (fig. 2g-i).

Despite these findings, the alloimmunogenic reaction and integration of differentiated cells into a local environment and continuous growth and function as differentiated cells are the principle challenges requiring further studies before hESC-OS can be used for clinical applications [Motaln et al., 2010].

Taken together, expanded hESC-OS acted as normal somatic tissue with a limited life span. Our data suggest that the application of hESC-OS at passages 5–10 should be used for developmental studies and transplantation. The current study supports the safe use of hESC-OS in in vivo applications and thus hESC-OS may be considered for large animal preclinical studies.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH/NIDR RO1DE 016530 (to P.H.K.). The authors thank the University of Michigan Stem Cell Core for support and Dr. Luis G. Villa-Diaz for advice.

Glossary

Abbreviations used in this paper

hESC-OS osteoblast-like cells derived from hESCs in osteogenic medium
hESCs human embryonic stem cells
hMSCs human mesenchymal stem cells
qRT-PCR quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Arpornmaeklong P., Wang Z., Pressler M.J., Brown S.E., Krebsbach P.H. Expansion and characterization of human embryonic stem cell-derived osteoblast-like cells. Cell Reprogram. 2010;12:377–389. doi: 10.1089/cell.2009.0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruder S.P., Jaiswal N., Haynesworth S.E. Growth kinetics, self-renewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation. J Cell Biochem. 1997;64:278–294. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(199702)64:2<278::aid-jcb11>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim J., Kang J.W., Park J.H., Choi Y., Choi K.S., Park K.D., Baek D.H., Seong S.K., Min H.K., Kim H.S. Biological characterization of long-term cultured human mesenchymal stem cells. Arch Pharm Res. 2009;32:117–126. doi: 10.1007/s12272-009-1125-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krebsbach P.H., Kuznetsov S.A., Satomura K., Emmons R.V., Rowe D.W., Robey P.G. Bone formation in vivo: comparison of osteogenesis by transplanted mouse and human marrow stromal fibroblasts. Transplantation. 1997;63:1059–1069. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199704270-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Motaln H., Schichor C., Lah T.T. Human mesenchymal stem cells and their use in cell-based therapies. Cancer. 2010;116:2519–2530. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosland G.V., Svendsen A., Torsvik A., Sobala E., McCormack E., Immervoll H., Mysliwietz J., Tonn J.C., Goldbrunner R., Lonning P.E., Bjerkvig R., Schichor C. Long-term cultures of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells frequently undergo spontaneous malignant transformation. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5331–5339. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rubio D., Garcia-Castro J., Martin M.C., de la Fuente R., Cigudosa J.C., Lloyd A.C., Bernad A. Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3035–3039. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cells, Tissues, Organs are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES