Abstract
Efficient osteogenic differentiation and bone formation from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) should have clinical applications in treating nonunion fracture healing. MSCs are adherent bone marrow stromal cells that can self-renew and differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and myogenic lineages. We have identified bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP-9) as one of the most osteogenic BMPs. Here we investigate the effect of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) on BMP-9-induced bone formation. We have found that endogenous IGF-2 expression is low in MSCs. Expression of IGF-2 can potentiate BMP-9-induced early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the expression of later markers. IGF-2 has been shown to augment BMP-9-induced ectopic bone formation in the stem cell implantation assay. In perinatal limb explant culture assay, IGF-2 enhances BMP-9-induced endochondral ossification, whereas IGF-2 itself can promote the expansion of the hypertropic chondrocyte zone of the cultured limb explants. Expression of the IGF antagonists IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 leads to inhibition of the IGF-2 effect on BMP-9-induced ALP activity and matrix mineralization. Mechanistically, IGF-2 is further shown to enhance the BMP-9-induced BMPR-Smad reporter activity and Smad1/5/8 nuclear translocation. PI3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor LY294002 abolishes the IGF-2 potentiation effect on BMP-9-mediated osteogenic signaling and can directly inhibit BMP-9 activity. These results demonstrate that BMP-9 crosstalks with IGF-2 through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway during osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. Taken together, our findings suggest that a combination of BMP-9 and IGF-2 may be explored as an effective bone-regeneration agent to treat large segmental bony defects, nonunion fracture, and/or osteoporotic fracture. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Keywords: BMP-9, bone formation, fracture healing, IGF-2, osteoblastic differentiation
Introduction
Bone is one of a few organs that retain the potential for regeneration into adult life and is the only tissue that can undergo continual remodeling throughout life. Osteogenesis is a sequential cascade that recapitulates most, if not all, of the cellular events occurring during embryonic skeletal development.(1) During skeletogenesis, bone formation can occur through two different pathways, intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification.(1) Bone regeneration following a fracture progresses through sequential phases similar to endochondral ossification, starting with chemotaxis and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. Efficacious bone regeneration would have an important impact on the clinical management of many bone and musculoskeletal disorders, such as with segmental bone loss, fracture nonunion, osteoporotic fracture, and failed spinal fusion. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great promise for tissue bioengineering and regenerative medicine. MSCs are adherent marrow stromal cells that can self-renew and differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and myogenic lineages.(2–4) Several signaling pathways have been implicated in regulating stem cell self-renewal and lineage commitment.(5–8)
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) play an important role in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation during development(8–11) and have been shown to play an important role in stem cell biology.(12,13) BMPs belong to the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily and consist of at least 15 members in humans.(8–11,14) Genetic disruptions of BMPs have resulted in various skeletal and extraskeletal abnormalities during development.(14,15) BMPs fulfill their signaling activity by interacting with the heterodimeric complex of two transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors, BMPR type I and BMPR type II.(9) The activated receptor kinases phosphorylate the transcription factors Smads 1, 5, or 8, which, in turn, form a heterodimeric complex with Smad4 in the nucleus and activate the expression of target genes in concert with other coactivators.(9) On analyzing the 14 types of BMPs, we found that BMP-9 is one of the most potent BMPs in inducing osteogenic differentiation of MSCs both in vitro and in vivo.(11,16–22) We further demonstrated that BMP-9 regulates a distinct set of downstream targets that may play a role in regulating BMP-induced osteoblast differentiation of MSCs.(11,18–21)
BMP-9 (also known as growth differentiation factor 2, or GDF-2) was first identified in the developing mouse liver,(23) and its possible roles include inducing and maintaining the cholinergic phenotype of embryonic basal forebrain cholinergic neurons,(24) inhibiting hepatic glucose production and inducing the expression of key enzymes of lipid metabolism,(25) and stimulating murine hepcidin 1 expression.(26) Although the functional role of BMP-9 in the skeletal system remains to be fully understood, the potent osteogenic activity of BMP-9 suggests that it may be used as an efficacious bone-regeneration agent. It is conceivable that other growth factors may act synergistically or enhance BMP-9-induced bone formation.
Here we sought to investigate the effect of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) on BMP-9-induced bone formation. As a member of the IGF signaling system, IGF-2 plays an important role in prenatal growth and development.(27) IGF-2 transduces its signaling through IGF receptors and activates the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway or the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.(28) Igf2 null mice exhibit a 40% decrease in birth weight compared with their wild-type littermates, suggesting an important role of IGF-2 in development.(29,30) We have found that endogenous IGF-2 expression is relatively low in MSCs. Exogenous expression of IGF-2 can potentiate BMP-9-induced early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the expression of later markers, such as osteocalcin (OC) and osteopontin (OPN), in MSCs. IGF-2 is shown to augment BMP-9-induced ectopic bone formation in stem cell implantation studies. Using perinatal limb explant culture, we have demonstrated that IGF-2 enhances BMP-9-induced endochondral ossification, whereas IGF-2 itself can promote expansion of the hypertropic chondrocyte zone of cultured limb explants. Exogenous expression of IGFBP3 and IGFBP4, but not IGFBP5, leads to inhibition of the IGF-2 effect on BMP-9-induced ALP activity and matrix mineralization in MSCs. Furthermore, IGF-2 is shown to enhance the BMP-9-induced BMPR-Smad reporter activity and the nuclear translocation of Smad1/5/8. While BMP9 stimulation does not significantly induce AKT phosphorylation, PI3K inhibitor LY294002 abolishes the IGF2 potentiation effect on BMP9-mediated osteogenic signaling, and can directly inhibit BMP9 activity, suggesting that BMP-9 may crosstalk with IGF-2 through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway during osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and chemicals
HEK293, C3H10T1/2, and C2C12 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Cell lines were maintained under conditions as described previouslyy.(16,18,22,31,32) Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
Recombinant adenoviruses expressing RFP, GFP, BMP9, IGF2, IGFBP3, IGFBP4, and IGFBP5
Recombinant adenoviruses were generated using AdEasy technology, as described previously.(16,17,33–35) The coding regions of human BMP9, IGF2, IGFBP3, IGFBP4, and IGFBP5 were PCR amplified and cloned into an adenoviral shuttle vector and subsequently used to generate recombinant adenoviruses in HEK293 cells. The resulting adenoviruses were designated as AdBMP9, AdR-IGF2, AdR-IGFBP3, AdR-IGFBP4, and AdR-IGFBP5. AdBMP9 also expresses GFP, whereas AdR-IGF2, AdR-IGFBP3, AdR-IGFBP4, and AdR-IGFBP5 express RFP as a marker for monitoring infection efficiency. Analogous adenovirus expressing only monomeric RFP (AdRFP) or GFP (AdGFP) were used as controls.(19–22,33,35–38)
Isolation of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs)
MEFs were isolated from postcoitus day 13.5 mice, as described previously.(21,22) Each embryo was dissected into 10 mL of sterile PBS, voided of its internal organs, and sheared through an 18-gauge syringe in the presence of 1 mL of 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA. After 15 minutes of incubation with gentle shaking at 37°C, DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) was added to inactivate trypsin. The cells were plated on 100-mm dishes and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Adherent cells were used as MEF cells. Aliquots were kept in a liquid nitrogen tank. All MEFs used in this study were within five passages.
RNA isolation and semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL Reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Total RNA was used to generate cDNA templates by RT reaction with hexamer and Superscript II RT (Invitrogen). The first-strand cDNA products were further diluted 5- to 10-fold and used as PCR templates. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was carried out as described previously.(21,22,31,34,38–41) PCR primers (Supplemental Table S1) were designed by using the Primer3 program (Free Software Foundation, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) to amplify the genes of interest (approximately 150 to 180 bp). A touchdown cycling program was as follows: 94°C for 2 minute for 1 cycle, 92°C for 20 seconds, 68°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 12 cycles with a decrease in 1°C per cycle and then at 92°C for 20 seconds, 57°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 20 seconds for 20 to 25 cycles depending on the abundance of a given gene. The specificity of PCR products was confirmed by resolving PCR products on 1.5% agarose gels. All samples were normalized by the expression level of GAPDH.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay
ALP activity was assessed by a modified Great Escape SEAP Chemiluminescence Assay (BD Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) and/or histochemical staining assay (using a mixture of 0.1 mg/mL of napthol AS-MX phosphate and 0.6 mg/mL of Fast Blue BB salt), as described previously.(16,17,19–22,31,34,38) For the chemilluminescence assays, each assay condition was performed in triplicate, and the results were repeated in at least three independent experiments. ALP activity was normalized by total cellular protein concentrations among the samples.
Transfection and luciferase reporter assay
Exponentially growing cells were seeded in 25-cm2 cell culture flasks and transfected with 2 µg per flask of BMP Smad-responsive luciferase reporter(42) p12xSBE-Luc using LipofectAmine (Invitrogen). At 16 hours after transfection, cells were replated to 24-well plates and infected with AdBMP9, AdR-IGF2, and/or AdRFP at 4 hours after replating. At 24 hours after infection, cells were lysed, and cell lysates were collected for luciferase assays using Promega's Luciferase Assay Kit. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate. The results were repeated in at least three independent experiments. Luciferase activity was normalized by total cellular protein concentrations among the samples. Reporter activity was expressed as mean ± SD.
Matrix mineralization assay (alizarin red S staining)
C3H10T1/2 cells and MEFs were seeded in 24-well culture plates and infected with AdGFP, AdBMP9, and/or AdR-IGF2. Infected cells were cultured in the presence of ascorbic acid (50 µg/mL) and β-glycerophosphate (10 mM). At 14 days after infection, mineralized matrix nodules were stained for calcium precipitation by means of alizarin red S staining, as described previously.(16,17,19–22,31,34,38) Cells were fixed with 0.05% (v/v) glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 10 minutes. After being washed with distilled water, fixed cells were incubated with 0.4% alizarin red S (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 minutes, followed by extensive washing with distilled water. The staining of calcium mineral deposits was recorded under bright-field microscopy.
Immunohistochemical staining
Cultured cells were infected with adenoviruses. At the indicated time points, cells were fixed with 10% formalin and washed with PBS. The fixed cells were permeabilized with 1% NP-40 and blocked with 10% goat serum, followed by incubation with an antiosteocalcin, osteopontin, Smad1/5/8, or p-AKT1/2/3 (Ser-473) antibody (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 hour. After washing, cells were incubated with biotin-labeled secondary antibody for 30 minutes, followed by incubating cells with streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate for 20 minutes at room temperature. The presence of the expected protein was visualized by 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining and examined under a microscope. Stains without the primary antibody or with control IgG were used as negative controls.
Subcutaneous stem cell implantation
C3H10T1/2 cells were infected with adenoviruses as indicated. At 16 hours after infection, cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS for subcutaneous injection (5 × 106/injection) into the flanks of athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (five animals per group, 4- to 6-week old males, Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN, USA). At 5 weeks after implantation, animals were euthanized, and the implantation sites were retrieved for histologic evaluation and other stains.
Fetal limb explant culture
The skinned forelimbs of mouse embryos (E18.5) were dissected under sterile conditions and incubated in DMEM (Invitrogen) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma), 50 µg/mL of ascorbic acid (Sigma), 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 100 µg/mL of penicillin-streptomycin (Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA) solution at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2 for up to 14 days. The limb explants were directly infected by AdR-IGF2 and/or AdBMP9 one day after dissection. Then 100 mM calcein (Sigma) was added in the medium on the same day. The medium was changed in half volume on day 7. Cultured tissues were observed at different time points under the microscope to confirm the survival of tissue cells and the expression of fluorescence markers.
Micro–computed tomographic (µCT) imaging analysis
All specimens were imaged using the µCT component of a GE Triumph (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) trimodality preclinical imaging system. All image data analysis was performed using Amira 5.2 (Visage Imaging, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and 3D volumetric data were obtained.
Histologic evaluation and trichrome staining
Retrieved and cultured tissues were fixed in 10% formalin (decalcified, if necessary) and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections of the embedded specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized and then rehydrated in a graduated fashion. The deparaffinized samples were subjected to antigen retrieval and fixation. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome.
Quantitative analysis of image data using NIH ImageJ
The image analysis software ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download.html) was used to analyze the regions of interest and/or intensity of the acquired image data. Random sampling of 10 to 20 fields were used routinely to determine mean ± SD values for statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis
Microsoft Excel was used to calculate standard deviations (SDs) and statistically significant differences between samples using the two-tailed Student's t test. For all quantitative assays, each assay condition was performed in triplicate, and the results were repeated in at least three independent experiments. All data collected were subjected to statistical analysis. A p-value of less than .05 was defined as statistically significance.
Results
Endogenous IGF-2 expression is low in mesenchymal stem cells, and exogenous IGF-2 expression potentiates BMP-9-induced early osteogenic marker ALP activity
In order to determine the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation, we first examined the endogenous expression level of IGF-2 on mesenchymal progenitor cells. Using semiquantitative RT-PCR, we found that IGF-2 expression level was undetectable in C3H10T1/2 cells, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), and C2C12 cells (Fig. 1A). However, under the same RT-PCR condition, the endogenous expression of BMP-9 was seemingly low but detectable, particularly in C3H10T1/2 and C2C12 cells. These results suggest that IGF-2 expression may be very low in MSCs.
To express exogenous IGF-2 effectively in MSCs, we constructed and generated a recombinant adenovirus-expressing human IGF-2 (ie, AdR-IGF2) using our previously developed AdEasy system.(33,35,43) As shown in Fig. 1B, IGF-2 expression was readily detected in AdR-IGF2 but not in Ad-RFP-infected C3H10T1/2 cells. Moreover, AdR-IGF2 was shown to effectively transduce C3H10T1/2 cells and MEFs (Fig. 1C).
We next tested the effect of exogenous IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. Subconfluent C3H10T1/2 cells were coinfected with AdGFP, AdBMP9, and/or AdR-IGF2 (at high, medium, and low dosages). The activity of the well-established early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP)(16–20,22) was measured on days 5, 7, and 9 after infection. IGF-2 expression alone did not induce any detectable ALP activity over the GFP control (Fig. 1D). As expected, BMP-9 induced a significant increase in ALP activity, especially on day 9 (Fig. 1D). When BMP-9 expression was fixed, an increase in IGF-2 expression significantly induced an increase in ALP activity (Fig. 1D). Thus these results strongly indicate that IGF-2 can potentiate BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation in a dose-dependent fashion.
Exogenous IGF-2 expression enhances BMP-9-induced late osteogenic marker expression and matrix mineralization
We further determined the effect of IGF-2 on the BMP-9-induced late stage of osteogenic differentiation. Both osteopontin and osteocalcin are well-established markers of late-stage bone formation.(16–20,22) We infected C3H10T1/2 cells with AdGFP, AdBMP9, and/or AdR-IGF2. The infected cells were fixed 10 days after infection and subjected to immunohistochemical staining using osteocalcin and osteopontin antibodies. Osteocalcin expression was detected in BMP-9- and BMP-9/IGF-2-transduced cells, whereas a higher than basal level staining was observed in IGF-2-stimulated cells (Fig. 2A). Osteopontin expression was detected in BMP-9/IGF-2-transduced cells and to a lesser extent in BMP-9- or IGF-2-stimulated cells (Fig. 2B). We also examined the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced matrix mineralization in MSCs. C3H10T1/2 cells were infected with AdGFP, AdBMP9, and/or AdR-IGF2. At 14 days after infection, the infected cells were subjected to alizarin red S staining. Numerous mineralization nodules were readily detected in BMP-9/IGF-2-stimulated cells, whereas a significant number of nodules also were found in BMP-9-transduced 3H10T1/2 cells (Fig. 2C). These findings strongly suggest that while IGF-2 itself has very limited ability to induce the late stage of bone formation, a combination of BMP-9 and IGF-2 significantly promotes the BMP-9-induced late stage of osteogenic differentiation in vitro.
IGF-2 expression augments BMP-9-induced ectopic bone formation and matrix mineralization in MSC implantation in vivo
Using our previously established stem cell implantation assay, we tested the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced ectopic bone formation in vivo. C3H10T1/2 cells were shown to be effectively coinfected with AdRFP, AdBMP9, and/or AdR-IGF2 (Fig. 3A). The infected cells were collected and injected subcutaneously into athymic nude mice. At week 5, the animals were euthanized, and the bony masses were retrieved (Fig. 3B). Consistent with our earlier reports, C3H10T1/2 cells transduced with either RFP or IGF-2 alone did not form any detectable masses (data not shown). The BMP-9-transduced cells formed bony masses, which were noticeably smaller than those formed by the cells transduced by both BMP-9 and IGF-2 (Fig. 3B). On histologic examination, bone masses formed in the BMP-9-transduced cell group showed some mature bone matrices and trabeculae with the presence of a significant number of undifferentiated mesenchymal progenitor cells (Figs. 3C, E). On the other hand, cells stimulated by both BMP-9 and IGF-2 formed more mature bone matrices and thicker trabeculae, with minimal or residual undifferentiated mesenchymal progenitor cells (Fig. 3C). Masson's trichrome staining confirmed that IGF-2 significantly augmented BMP-9-induced matrix mineralization (Fig. 3D, E). The preceding in vivo results further confirmed the in vitro findings presented in Fig. 1D and Fig. 2, suggesting that IGF-2 may be able to potentiate osteogenic differentiation of MSCs induced by BMP-9.
IGF-2 promotes expansion of the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone and enhances BMP-9-induced endochondral ossification in fetal limb explant culture
IGF-2 signaling plays an important role in development.(28) We examined the effect of IGF-2 on skeletal development in fetal limb explant culture in the presence or absence of BMP-9. Perinatal E18.5 mouse embryos were harvested. The skinned fetal limbs were isolated and cultured in organ culture medium (Fig. 4A, i). The soft tissues associated with the cultured limb expants were infected with adenovirus expressing GFP (Fig. 4A, ii) or RFP (Fig. 4A, iii). The new bone formation was traced by the green fluorescence dye calcein (Fig. 4A, iv). When the limb explants were stimulated with GFP, IGF-2, and/or BMP-9 for 2 weeks, significant new bone formation (in the fourth metacarpal) was found in the limb explants infected with AdBMP9 and AdBMP9/AdR-IGF2, whereas the BMP-9/IGF-2-stimulated limb explants had the highest level of new bone formation, as judged by the calcein uptake (Fig. 4B). Histologic examination confirmed that increased endochondral ossification in BMP-9 and BMP-9/IGF-2 stimulated explants (Fig. 4C). At a higher magnification, either BMP-9 or IGF-2 stimulation significantly expanded the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone compared with that of the GFP control (Fig. 4D). These organ culture studies strongly suggest that IGF-2 may promote expansion of the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone and enhance BMP-9-induced endochondral ossification.
IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 antagonize the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs
IGF-2 signaling can be negatively regulated by IGFBPs. We analyzed the endogenous expression level of three IGFBPs. We found that IGFBP3 was highly expressed in MEFs but undetectable in both C3H10T1/2 and C2C12 cells (Fig. 5A). IGFBP4 was highly expressed in MEFs, whereas it was barely detectable in C3H10T1/2 and C2C12 cells (Fig. 5A). IGFBP5 expression was low or detectable in all three lines examined (Fig. 5A). These results indicate that the expression pattern of the three IGFBPs is different in the two progenitor lines C3H10T1/2 and C2C12 from that in the pool population of MEFs.
We next analyzed whether IGFBPs would antagonize IGF-2's effect on BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation. C3H10T1/2 cells were infected with AdGFP, AdR-IGF2, and/or AdBMP9 in the presence or absence of IGFBPs. At 7 or 9 days after infection, cells were collected and subjected to ALP activity assay. Both IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 were shown to inhibit IGF-2-enhanced BMP-9 osteogenic activity, whereas IGFBP5 exerted a minimal or insignificant inhibitory effect on IGF-2/BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells (Fig. 5B). A similar result also was found in alizarin red S staining assay because IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 were shown to inhibit BMP-9/IGF-2-induced matrix mineralization (Fig. 5C). In both assays, IGFBP4 was seemingly the strongest inhibitor of IGF-2's effect on BMP-9 osteogenic signaling. These results suggest that among the IGFBPs, IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 may be able to inhibit IGF-2-enhanced BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation.
IGF-2 acts synergistically with BMP-9 in activating Smad signaling activity
To investigate the mechanism behind IGF2's effect on BMP-9-induced osteogenic signaling, we examined whether IGF-2 affected BMP-9 function at the Smad signaling level. We transfected C3H10T1/2 cells with a previously reported BMPR-Smad luciferase reporter, p12xSBE-Luc(42), and infected with GFP, IGF-2, and/or BMP-9 adenoviruses. As expected, BMP-9 was shown to significantly upregulate the BMPR-Smad reporter activity, whereas IGF-2 alone did not significantly activate BMPR-Smad reporter activity (Fig. 6A). However, IGF-2 was shown to effectively enhance BMP-9-induced BMPR-Smad reporter activity (Fig. 6A). Consistent with the results from R-Smad reporter assay, BMP-9 was shown to induce nuclear translocation of Smad1/5/8, which was further augmented by IGF-2 (Fig. 6B). IGF-2 alone failed to induce significant nuclear translocation of Smad1/5/8 (Fig. 6B). These results strongly suggest that IGF-2 may exhibit its stimulatory effect on BMP-9 signaling by modulating BMPR-Smad transcriptional activity.
BMP-9 crosstalks with IGF-2 through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in MSCs
IGF-2 transduces its signaling through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. We sought to test whether BMP-9 crosstalks with IGF-2 through the PI3K/AKT pathway. When C3H10T1/2 cells were stimulated with GFP, IGF-2, and/or BMP-9 and subjected to immunohistochemical staining, the phosphorylated form of AKT1/2/3 (Ser-473) was detected in IGF-2-stimulated cells but not apparently in the control or BMP-9-stimulated cells (Fig. 6C). However, the phosphorylated AKT1/2/3 was most pronounced in the cells stimulated by both IGF-2 and BMP-9 (Fig. 6C), suggesting that there may be crosstalk between the BMP-9 and IGF-2 pathways.
Since AKT is regulated by PI3K, we further tested whether IGF-2-activated PI3K activity plays any role in BMP-9 signaling. Using a well-established PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, we infected C3H10T1/2 cells with GFP, BMP-9, and/or IGF-2 and treated them with LY294002 for 7 and 9 days. We found that the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 effectively inhibited the ALP activity in the cells stimulated by BMP-9 and IGF-2 (Fig. 6D). Interestingly, LY294002 also was shown to inhibit BMP-9-induced ALP activity (Fig. 6D, and data not shown), suggesting that PI3K may cross-regulate BMP-9-mediated osteogenic signaling.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-induced bone formation. Through a comprehensive analysis of the 14 types of BMPs, we previously found that BMP-9 is one of the most osteogenic BMPs both in vitro and in vivo.(11,16–22) Our findings strongly suggest that BMP-9 may be used as an efficacious bone-regeneration agent. Nonetheless, it is conceivable that more efficacious bone regeneration may be achieved if BMP-9 is administered with other growth factors, such as IGF-2. Here we have found that endogenous IGF-2 expression is relatively low in MSCs. Exogenous expression of IGF-2 can potentiate BMP-9-induced activity of the early osteogenic marker ALP and the expression of later markers such as OC and OPN in MSCs. IGF-2 is shown to augment BMP-9-induced ectopic bone formation in our stem cell implantation assay. We have further demonstrated that IGF-2 enhances BMP-9-induced endochondral ossification, whereas IGF-2 itself can promote expansion of the hypertropic chondrocyte zone of the cultured limb explants. IGFBP3 and IGFBP4 can inhibit the IGF-2 effect on BMP-9-induced ALP activity and matrix mineralization in MSCs. IGF-2 is shown to enhance the BMP-9-induced BMPR-Smad reporter activity and the nuclear translocation of Smad1/5/8. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 abolishes the IGF-2 potentiation effect on BMP-9-mediated osteogenic signaling and can directly inhibit BMP-9 activity, suggesting that BMP-9 may crosstalk with IGF-2 through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway during osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
The IGF system consists of three ligands (IGF-1, IGF-2, and insulin), four cell-membrane receptors [IGF receptor type 1 (IGF-1R), insulin receptor isoform A (IR-A), hybrid receptors, and IGF receptor type 2 (IGF-2R)], and six IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP1 through -6).(27) It has been reported that TGF-β regulates IGFBP4 proteolysis in osteoblasts, which depends on IGF-2, suggesting that local TGF-β and IGF-2 in the bone microenvironment coordinately amplify IGF-1 bioavailability through controlled IGFBP4 proteolysis to promote bone formation.(44) This is supported by an earlier study in which systemic administration of IGFBP4 increased bone-formation parameters in mice by increasing IGF bioavailability in the circulation via an IGFBP-4 protease–dependent mechanism.(45) However, paracrine overexpression of IGFBP4 in osteoblasts of transgenic mice decreases bone turnover and causes global growth retardation.(46) As a member of the IGF signaling system, IGF-2 plays an important role in prenatal growth and postnatal development. IGF-2 transduces its signaling through IGF receptors and activates the PI3K/AKT pathway or the MAPK pathway.(27) Although viable and fertile, Igf2 null mice exhibit a 40% decrease in birth weight compared with their wild-type littermates, suggesting an important role of IGF-2 in development.
The IGF2 gene is imprinted and expressed only from the paternal allele in the placenta and fetal tissues, excluding the brain.(47) IGF2 expression becomes biallelic in tissues in humans, but not rodents, after birth. Imprinting of the IGF2 gene is controlled in part by the H19DMR (differentially methylated region) gene, which plays an important role in parent-of-origin-specific silencing of neighboring H19 and IGF2. There are ontogenetic shifts in IGF2 imprinting and IGF promoter usage that may influence IGF bioavailability in placental and fetal tissues at critical stages of development.(48,49) Loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2 is strongly associated with cell proliferation and in many cases with human malignancies, including some sarcomas. The excess of IGF-2 in mice causes somatic overgrowth, visceromegaly, placentomegaly, omphalocele, and cardiac and adrenal defects, which are also features of the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, a genetically complex human disorder associated with chromosomal abnormalities in the 11p15.5 region where the IGF2 gene resides.(50) Mouse chimeras made with androgenetic (two paternal genomes) ova or embryonic stem cells frequently die at the perinatal stage and exhibit a range of defects, with the most noticeable being a pronounced overgrowth of rib cartilage, whole-body overgrowth, and perinatal death.(51) It has been reported that hypoxic stress enhanced osteoclast differentiation via increasing IGF-2 production by nonosteoclastic cells. The upregulation of IGF-2 derived from nonosteoclastic cells may be a crucial factor for osteoclast differentiation.(52) Furthermore, it has been reported that the local production of IGF-2 may modulate both osteoblast-osteoclast interactions and osteoclast formation and may play an important role in bone remodeling.(52) It has been reported recently that IGF-1 and BMP-2 can act synergistically in promoting chondrogenesis.(53,54) However, the molecular mechanisms of the IGF-2 stimulation that enhance osteoclast formation remain unknown.
IGF bioavailability is tightly controlled by IGFBPs, which are a family of six homologous multifunctional high-affinity proteins in the circulation. IGFBPs are mostly inhibitory to IGF actions but also have IGF-independent actions.(28) In the circulation, IGF-2 is bound mainly to IGFBP3, which is the most abundant IGFBP in serum. At the cellular level, the interaction of IGFs with their receptors is influenced by the presence of IGFBPs. Depending on the cellular context and the IGFBP present, the actions of IGFs can be either enhanced or inhibited. IGF-binding capacity of IGFBPs is regulated by the presence of a wide range of proteolytic enzymes. Increasing evidence suggests that IGFBPs also have IGF-independent functions. For example, IGFBP3 itself has a proapoptotic function, whereas IGFBP5 has a significant influence on bone mineral density (BMD) acquisition and maintenance in a gender- and age-dependent fashion, which may have implications for the gender-biased progression of osteoporosis.(55) Our results have demonstrated that IGFBP3 and IGFBP4, but not IGFBP5, can antagonize IGF-2 action on BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation. It was reported that IGFBP5 inhibits osteoblast differentiation and skeletal growth by blocking IGF actions.(56) Interestingly, an early report indicated that IGFBP3 potentiation of IGF action can be mediated through the PI3K pathway and is associated with alteration in AKT sensitivity.(57)
As one of the major pathways involved in IGF signaling, PI3K/AKT signaling is implicated in mediating a broad range of cellular responses, although its role in osteogenesis remains to be fully understood. In osteoclasts, PI3K functions as a critical downstream effecter of c-fms [the receptor for colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1)], αvβ3 integrin, and RANK [receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)], affecting osteoclast survival and activity. PI3K/AKT signal relay may cooperate with Smad in BMP-2-induced CSF-1 expression and osteoclast differentiation.(58) Recent evidence suggests a role for PI3K/AKT in osteoblast differentiation and survival. It was reported that BMP-2-induced PI3K and AKT kinase are required in osteoblast differentiation and BMP-2/Smad-dependent gene transcription.(59) Runx2 induces osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and enhances their migration by coupling with PI3K/AKT signaling,(60) suggesting that Runx2 and PI3K/AKT signaling are mutually dependent on each other in the regulation of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. It has been reported recently that an intact IGF-induced PI3K/AKT signaling cascade is essential for BMP-2-activated osteoblast differentiation and maturation, bone development, and growth.(61–65) Conversely, mice deficient in a negative regulator of PI3K signaling, the tumor suppressor PTEN in osteochondroprogenitor cells, exhibited epiphyseal growth plate abnormalities and skeletal overgrowth(66) and demonstrated a dramatic and progressively increasing BMD throughout life.(67) Taken together, these findings are consistent with our current results with the effect of IGF-2 on BMP-9-mediated osteogenic signaling, suggesting that manipulations of BMP and IGF pathways could facilitate bone remodeling and fracture repair.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Di Chen of the University of Rochester Medical Center for providing the p12xSBE-Luc plasmid. This work was supported in part by research grants from the Brinson Foundation (TCH), the National Institutes of Health (CA106569, AT004418, AR50142, and AR054381 to TCH, RCH, and HHL), the 863 Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2007AA2z400 to CL, TCH, and ZLD), the Natural Science Foundation of China (30901530 to XL, 30800658 to JL, and 30772211 to ZLD), and the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (2008BB5396 to LC and MT and 2009BB5060 to JL).
Disclosures
All the authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary material
References
- 1.Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W. Bone development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:191–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276:71–74. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aubin JE. Advances in the osteoblast lineage. Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;76:899–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Morrison SJ. Diverse mechanisms regulate stem cell self-renewal. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16:700–707. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reya T, Clevers H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature. 2005;434:843–850. doi: 10.1038/nature03319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo J, Chen J, Deng ZL, et al. Wnt signaling and human diseases: what are the therapeutic implications? Lab Invest. 2007;87:97–103. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deng ZL, Sharff KA, Tang N, et al. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation during skeletal development. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2001–2021. doi: 10.2741/2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00432-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Attisano L, Wrana JL. Signal transduction by the TGF-beta superfamily. Science. 2002;296:1646–1647. doi: 10.1126/science.1071809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luu HH, Song WX, Luo X, et al. Distinct roles of bone morphogenetic proteins in osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:665–677. doi: 10.1002/jor.20359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Varga AC, Wrana JL. The disparate role of BMP in stem cell biology. Oncogene. 2005;24:5713–5721. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang J, Li L. BMP signaling and stem cell regulation. Dev Biol. 2005;284:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hogan BL. Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1580–1594. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.13.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao GQ. Consequences of knocking out BMP signaling in the mouse. Genesis. 2003;35:43–56. doi: 10.1002/gene.10167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM, et al. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1544–1552. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200308000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kang Q, Sun MH, Cheng H, et al. Characterization of the distinct orthotopic bone-forming activity of 14 BMPs using recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2004;11:1312–1320. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peng Y, Kang Q, Cheng H, et al. Transcriptional characterization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)-mediated osteogenic signaling. J Cell Biochem. 2003;90:1149–1165. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peng Y, Kang Q, Luo Q, et al. Inhibitor of DNA binding/differentiation helix-loop-helix proteins mediate bone morphogenetic protein-induced osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:32941–32949. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403344200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luo Q, Kang Q, Si W, et al. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is regulated by Wnt and bone morphogenetic proteins signaling in osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55958–55968. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407810200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sharff KA, Song WX, Luo X, et al. Hey1 basic helix-loop-helix protein plays an important role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:649–659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806389200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tang N, Song WX, Luo J, et al. BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitors requires functional canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2448–2464. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00569.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Song JJ, Celeste AJ, Kong FM, Jirtle RL, Rosen V, Thies RS. Bone morphogenetic protein-9 binds to liver cells and stimulates proliferation. Endocrinology. 1995;136:4293–4297. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.10.7664647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lopez-Coviella I, Berse B, Krauss R, Thies RS, Blusztajn JK. Induction and maintenance of the neuronal cholinergic phenotype in the central nervous system by BMP-9. Science. 2000;289:313–316. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen C, Grzegorzewski KJ, Barash S, et al. An integrated functional genomics screening program reveals a role for BMP-9 in glucose homeostasis. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:294–301. doi: 10.1038/nbt795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Truksa J, Peng H, Lee P, Beutler E. Bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, and 9 stimulate murine hepcidin 1 expression independently of Hfe, transferrin receptor 2 (Tfr2), and IL-6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10289–10293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603124103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Randhawa R, Cohen P. The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in prenatal growth. Mol Genet Metab. 2005;86:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.O'Dell SD, Day IN. Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;30:767–771. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(98)00048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DeChiara TM, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell. 1991;64:849–859. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90513-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baker J, Liu JP, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A. Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell. 1993;75:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luo X, Chen J, Song WX, et al. Osteogenic BMPs promote tumor growth of human osteosarcomas that harbor differentiation defects. Lab Invest. 2008;88:1264–1277. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haydon RC, Zhou L, Feng T, et al. Nuclear receptor agonists as potential differentiation therapy agents for human osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1288–1294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, Yu J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:2509–2514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kang Q, Song WX, Luo Q, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the dual roles of BMPs in regulating adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18:545–559. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Luo J, Deng ZL, Luo X, et al. A protocol for rapid generation of recombinant adenoviruses using the AdEasy system. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1236–1247. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.He TC, Chan TA, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. PPARdelta is an APC-regulated target of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell. 1999;99:335–345. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway [see comments] Science. 1998;281:1509–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5382.1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Si W, Kang Q, Luu HH, et al. CCN1/Cyr61 is regulated by the canonical Wnt signal and plays an important role in Wnt3A-induced osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:2955–2964. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.2955-2964.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bi Y, Huang J, He Y, et al. Wnt antagonist SFRP3 inhibits the differentiation of mouse hepatic progenitor cells. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:295–303. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhu GH, Huang J, Bi Y, et al. Activation of RXR and RAR signaling promotes myogenic differentiation of myoblastic C2C12 cells. Differentiation. 2009;78:195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang J, Bi Y, Zhu GH, et al. Retinoic acid signalling induces the differentiation of mouse fetal liver-derived hepatic progenitor cells. Liver Int. 2009;29:1569–1581. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhao M, Qiao M, Oyajobi BO, Mundy GR, Chen D. E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 mediates core-binding factor alpha1/Runx2 degradation and plays a specific role in osteoblast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27939–27944. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304132200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He T-C. Adenoviral Vectors Adenoviral Vectors in Current Protocols in Human Genetics, vol. Unit 12.4. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004. pp. 12.4.1–12.4.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ortiz CO, Chen BK, Bale LK, Overgaard MT, Oxvig C, Conover CA. Transforming growth factor-beta regulation of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 protease system in cultured human osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1066–1072. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miyakoshi N, Qin X, Kasukawa Y, et al. Systemic administration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) increases bone formation parameters in mice by increasing IGF bioavailability via an IGFBP-4 protease-dependent mechanism. Endocrinology. 2001;142:2641–2648. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.6.8192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang M, Faugere MC, Malluche H, Rosen CJ, Chernausek SD, Clemens TL. Paracrine overexpression of IGFBP-4 in osteoblasts of transgenic mice decreases bone turnover and causes global growth retardation. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:836–843. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chard T. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in normal and abnormal human fetal growth. Growth Regul. 1994;4:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, Hughes-Davies L, Kouzarides T. DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nat Genet. 2000;24:88–91. doi: 10.1038/71750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:662–673. doi: 10.1038/nrg887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Eggenschwiler J, Ludwig T, Fisher P, Leighton PA, Tilghman SM, Efstratiadis A. Mouse mutant embryos overexpressing IGF-II exhibit phenotypic features of the Beckwith-Wiedemann and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndromes. Genes Dev. 1997;11:3128–3142. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.23.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McLaughlin KJ, Kochanowski H, Solter D, Schwarzkopf G, Szabo PE, Mann JR. Roles of the imprinted gene Igf2 and paternal duplication of distal chromosome 7 in the perinatal abnormalities of androgenetic mouse chimeras. Development. 1997;124:4897–4904. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.23.4897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nakao K, Aoyama M, Fukuoka H, et al. IGF2 modulates the microenvironment for osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;378:462–466. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen FM, Chen R, Wang XJ, Sun HH, Wu ZF. In vitro cellular responses to scaffolds containing two microencapulated growth factors. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5215–5224. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Steinert AF, Palmer GD, Pilapil C, Noth U, Evans CH, Ghivizzani SC. Enhanced in vitro chondrogenesis of primary mesenchymal stem cells by combined gene transfer. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:1127–1139. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Salih DA, Mohan S, Kasukawa Y, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 induces a gender-related decrease in bone mineral density in transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 2005;146:931–940. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mukherjee A, Rotwein P. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 inhibits osteoblast differentiation and skeletal growth by blocking insulin-like growth factor actions. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22:1238–1250. doi: 10.1210/me.2008-0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Conover CA, Bale LK, Durham SK, Powell DR. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 potentiation of IGF action is mediated through the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway and is associated with alteration in protein kinase B/AKT sensitivity. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3098–3103. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.9.7660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mandal CC, Ghosh Choudhury G, Ghosh-Choudhury N. Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt signal relay cooperates with smad in bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) expression and osteoclast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2009;150:4989–4998. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ghosh-Choudhury N, Abboud SL, Nishimura R, Celeste A, Mahimainathan L, Choudhury GG. Requirement of BMP-2-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt serine/threonine kinase in osteoblast differentiation and Smad-dependent BMP-2 gene transcription. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33361–33368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205053200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fujita T, Azuma Y, Fukuyama R, et al. Runx2 induces osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and enhances their migration by coupling with PI3K-Akt signaling. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:85–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200401138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mukherjee A, Rotwein P. Akt promotes BMP2-mediated osteoblast differentiation and bone development. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:716–726. doi: 10.1242/jcs.042770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mukherjee A, Wilson EM, Rotwein P. Selective signaling by Akt2 promotes bone morphogenetic protein 2-mediated osteoblast differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 30:1018–1027. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01401-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Noda T, Tokuda H, Yoshida M, et al. Possible involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in insulin-like growth factor-I-induced alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts. Horm Metab Res. 2005;37:270–274. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Osyczka AM, Leboy PS. Bone morphogenetic protein regulation of early osteoblast genes in human marrow stromal cells is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Endocrinology. 2005;146:3428–3437. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Raucci A, Bellosta P, Grassi R, Basilico C, Mansukhani A. Osteoblast proliferation or differentiation is regulated by relative strengths of opposing signaling pathways. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215:442–451. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ford-Hutchinson AF, Ali Z, Lines SE, Hallgrimsson B, Boyd SK, Jirik FR. Inactivation of Pten in osteo-chondroprogenitor cells leads to epiphyseal growth plate abnormalities and skeletal overgrowth. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1245–1259. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liu X, Bruxvoort KJ, et al. Lifelong accumulation of bone in mice lacking Pten in osteoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:2259–2264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604153104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.