Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2011 Aug 15;589(Pt 16):4077. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.215061

Corrigenda

PMCID: PMC3180004

In Tzeng et al. (2011), in Table 2, the coefficients of determination for the normalised conductance model were presented in error. The correct values are shown in the table below. This error does not alter the interpretation or discussion in the text.

Table 2.

Parameter estimates between control and Ca2+ channel blockade condition during 0.05 and 0.10 Hz OLBNP

0.10 Hz 0.05 Hz 2 × 2 RMANOVA



Control Blockade Control Blockade Freq Con Freq × Con
Windkessel model
Capacitive gain (cm mmHg−1) 1.7 ± 0.30 1.8 ± 0.58 1.6 ± 0.87 1.4 ± 0.60 0.23 0.94 0.40
Conductive gain (cm s−1 mmHg−1) 0.022 ± 0.077 1.8 ± 0.58 −0.008 ± 0.21 0.20 ± 0.35 0.60 <0.05 0.28
R2 0.99 ± 0.016 0.99 ± 0.0097 0.91 ± 0.065 0.89 ± 0.068
Normalised Windkessel model
Capacitive gain (% s−1 mmHg−1) 2.3 ± 0.45 2.9 ± 0.87 2.4 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 0.93 0.38 0.58 0.22
Conductive gain (% mmHg−1) 0.11 ± 0.36 0.13 ± 0.10 −0.038 ± 0.32 0.27 ± 0.51 0.96 <0.05 0.26
R2 0.97 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.0044 0.91 ± 0.069 0.89 ± 0.067
Conductance model
Conductive gain (cm s−1 mmHg−1) 0.82 ± 0.32 0.96 ± 0.35 0.21 ± 0.32 0.48 ± 0.40 <0.05 <0.05 0.17
R2 0.53 ± 0.23 0.64 ± 0.22 0.34 ± 0.31 0.42 ± 0.33
Normalised conductance model
Conductive gain (% mmHg−1) 1.1 ± 0.35 1.5 ± 0.49 0.31 ± 0.47 0.71 ± 0.52 <0.05 <0.05 0.91
R2 0.57 ± 0.25 0.64 ± 0.22 0.34 ± 0.31 0.42 ± 0.33

Freq, frequency; Con, drug condition; Freq × Con, interaction.

Reference

  1. Tzeng YC, Chan GS, Willie CK, Ainslie PN. Determinants of human cerebral pressure–flow velocity relationships: new insights from vascular modelling and Ca2+ channel blockade. J Physiol. 2011;589:3263–3274. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.206953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES