Skip to main content
Communicative & Integrative Biology logoLink to Communicative & Integrative Biology
. 2011 Jul 1;4(4):391–393. doi: 10.4161/cib.4.4.15552

Facilitating axon regeneration in the injured CNS by microtubules stabilization

Vetrivel Sengottuvel 1, Dietmar Fischer 1,
PMCID: PMC3181504  PMID: 21966554

Abstract

Traumatic CNS injuries often cause permanent, devastating disabilities due to a lack of regeneration of damaged axons. Next to an insufficient intrinsic capability of CNS neurons to regrow axons, also inhibitory molecules that are associated with the CNS myelin and the glial scar contribute to the failure of axonal regeneration. Strategies targeting the inhibitory molecules, their receptors or downstream signaling pathways result in little improvement of regeneration in vivo. However, the combination of such approaches together with measures that increase the intrinsic growth potential of neurons reportedly lead to a significantly better outcome. In this mini-review we outline and discuss a novel therapeutic strategy facilitating axon regeneration by directly targeting microtubule dynamics in axonal growth cones and reducing the inhibitory scar formation at the injury site by the anticancer drug Taxol. Moreover, we portray the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of Taxol and its potential as an adjuvant drug to accomplish substantial regeneration and functional recovery after CNS injuries in vivo.

Key words: Taxol, microtubules, axon, regeneration, CNTF, LIF, central nervous system, retina


Damage of the optic nerve or spinal cord injury can result in devastating disabilities, such as irreversible blindness or paralysis. These disabilities are often due to the insufficient capacity of the central nervous system (CNS) to regenerate injured axons and are partially attributable to a destabilization of growth cones by molecules associated with the CNS white matter (e.g., Nogo, myelin associated glycoprotein and oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein) and/or the glial scar (e.g., chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, CSPGs).1,2 Exposure of injured axon tips to central myelin or CSPGs leads via specific receptors and activation of RhoA/ROCK signaling to a depolymerisation of actin filaments in growth cones and subsequent growth inhibition.37 Thus, one common strategy to enhance axon regeneration is stabilizing the growth cones by preventing the actin filament depolymerization by inhibitory molecules.1 In the visual system, for instance, viral overexpression of a dominant negative form of the Nogo receptor or inactivation of RhoA/ROCK-signaling by the expression of ADP ribosyl transferase in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) have been shown to overcome myelin inhibition and to promote axon regeneration in the optic nerve.8,9 However, these studies and others have also shown that overcoming inhibitory signaling alone results only in little regeneration, since mature central neurons, contrary to embryonic or postnatal neurons, possess only a weak intrinsic capacity to regrow axons even in the absence of inhibitors. Therefore, combinatorial treatments aiming to activate the intrinsic growth ability and measures to overcome inhibitory signaling result in significant better axon regeneration than each treatment alone.811

Microtubules Stabilization Facilitates Axonal Growth and Desensitizes Growth Cones Towards Inhibitory Molecules In Vitro

Microtubules polymerization is essential for axonal growth and is modulated by microtubules-actin interaction in the growth cone.12,13 Thus, myelin inhibitors and CSPGs indirectly compromise microtubules extension. In our recent article we directly targeted microtubules dynamics using the clinically established anticancer drug Paclitaxel (Taxol).14 Taxol can differentially affect the microtubule dynamics based on the concentrations at which it is applied. At higher concentrations, as typically used for cancer therapy, Taxol hyperstabilizes microtubules, thereby abrogates microtubule extension and inhibits mitotic spindle assembly, which is essential for cell division. However, at lower concentrations Taxol favors the polymerization of microtubules at the plus ends.15,16 Hence, we hypothesized that at low concentrations Taxol might enhance polymerization of microtubules in growth cones and thereby improve axon growth of mature CNS neurons. Indeed, axon outgrowth of mature RGCs was markedly increased on a growth permissive substrate in culture when Taxol was applied at a concentration of 1–3 nM, whereas at a concentration of 10 nM it had no effect. At a concentration of 50 nM the drug even reduced outgrowth compared to untreated controls. The beneficial effects of Taxol were compromised by nocodazole a compound that increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules, suggesting that Taxol indeed enhanced neurite extension directly by microtubules stabilization. The effects of Taxol on neurite growth were further increased by the coadministration of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), implying that both molecules acted synergistically through different mechanisms. CNTF mediates its effects via the activation of various signaling pathways in the cell body of neurons.17,18 In contrast, Taxol treatment stabilized growth cones and completely overcame the neurite outgrowth inhibition by myelin without affecting the myelin-induced activation of RhoA. This disinhibitory effect of Taxol was also found for inhibitory CSPGs, implying that it is not restricted to specific receptors or pathways, but rather mediated by microtubules polymerization. One possible explanation for the disinhibitory effect of Taxol might be the disentanglement of the coupled interaction of actin and microtubules in the growth cone. This makes the microtubule polymerization at the plus ends independent of the state of actin polymerization and thereby stabilizes the overall cytoskeleton structure in the growth cone, including the microtubules in the filopodial extensions.14,19 Thus, in a defined concentration range Taxol exerts two beneficial effects that are relevant for axon regeneration: it promotes axon extension and decreases the sensitivity of growth cones towards inhibitory molecules.

Local Application of Taxol Facilitates Axon Regeneration In Vivo

The optic nerve is a widely used model system to study the regenerative failure of CNS axons. In vivo mature RGCs can be transformed into a regenerative state by lens injury or intravitreal application of zymosan or the toll-like receptor 2 agonist Pam3Cys.2024 The transformation of RGCs into a regenerative state is associated with a dramatic change in gene expression, which helps RGCs to survive optic nerve injury and also extend axons beyond the optic nerve injury site.8 Astrocyte-derived CNTF and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) have been identified as the essential key factors mediating both the neuroprotective and axon growth-promoting effects after lens injury.17,25,26 Nevertheless, the regeneration of stimulated RGCs is still limited by the inhibitory environment of the glial scar and myelin.

Our recent paper demonstrates that locally applied Taxol, although not affecting the regenerative state or survival of RGCs, markedly augmented initial growth of axons beyond the lesion site of the optic nerve.14 These effects may be due to its disinhibitory and axon growth-promoting effects observed in cell culture. When evaluated 14 days after injury, local Taxol application only moderately improved axonal regeneration in the optic nerve. However, regeneration was dramatically enhanced when Taxol treatment was combined with a stimulation of the regenerative state of RGCs by lens injury. The regeneration of axons 1 mm beyond the lesion site was 15 times higher with the combinatorial treatment compared to lens injury alone. Notably, although Taxol exerted beneficial effects at a broad concentration range in vivo, its effects were, as observed in culture, concentration dependent with strongest effects measured at low concentrations. This finding may be relevant in view of a potential therapeutic use for nerve repair in humans, since it may lower the risk for known adverse side effects associated with the application of much higher dosages of the drug in cancer therapy. In contrast to locally applied Taxol at the injury site, intravitreal injections of Taxol did not facilitate axon regeneration, suggesting that the growth promoting effects were due to an interaction of the drug with the microtubules in growth cones and, as discussed below, to the delayed glial scar formation.

In accordance to our results, another concurrently published study has reported that the continuous application of low concentrations of Taxol into the lesion site of the spinal cord combined with an activation of the regenerative state of dorsal root ganglion neurons through a peripheral conditioning lesion improved axon regeneration and functional recovery.27 These data demonstrate that microtubules stabilization by Taxol is a suitable approach to successfully facilitate axon regeneration in different areas of the CNS.

Taxol Treatment Delays Glial Scar Formation

Glial scar formation is one of the major impediments that hinders axon regeneration after CNS injury. The events that occur around the lesion site include the proliferation of astrocytes, which leads to astrocytic hypertrophy and expression of inhibitory molecules such as CSPGs.2 In addition, the activation of microglia and recruitment of peripheral macrophages from the blood stream are also involved in glial scar formation. The latter ones have been recently proposed to function as another significant barrier for axon regeneration.28,29 Since Taxol is an anti-proliferative drug and also known to affect cell migration,30,31 it was plausible that locally applied Taxol might also influence the glial scar formation. Indeed, even at low concentrations Taxol transiently delayed the proliferation of astrocytes and the infiltration of macrophages around the lesion site after optic nerve injury. Notably, Taxol suppressed the expression of inhibitory CSPGs in the injured optic nerve a finding that was also reported in the injured spinal cord.14,27 One explanation for the CSPG suppression could be an inhibition of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling by Taxol, which is necessary for the inhibitory scar formation.32,33 Previous reports proposed that microtubules destabilization modulates TGFβ signaling by favoring phosphorylation of Smads and translocation of the microtubule bound-transcription factors from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.34 Thus, microtubule stabilization by Taxol enhances the binding of Smad to microtubules, thereby diminishing the translocation of Smads to the nucleus and abrogating TGFβ signaling.27 Another explanation could be that the expression of TGFβ per se is reduced by the Taxol treatment, since Taxol delays the proliferation and migration of glial cells and macrophages, which are known sources of TGFβ at the lesion site. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the delay in glial scar formation and reduction of macrophage invasion by Taxol treatment may have also contributed to the augmented regeneration observed after optic nerve injury.

Perspectives

Current reports demonstrate that Taxol, when locally applied at the injury site fosters axon regeneration by microtubules stabilization in the axonal growth cone and delays the inhibitory glial scar formation.14,27 Moreover, Taxol exerts its beneficial effects on axon regeneration at low concentrations, which reduces the risk of potential adverse side effects. Taxol is also a clinically approved drug for humans which makes this compound a promising candidate as an adjuvant drug for the treatment of patients suffering from traumatic CNS injuries or stroke. Additional optimization of modalities of drug application may further improve the beneficial outcome on axon regeneration and be necessary for a potential application in humans. In fact, a previous study has reported that the systemic application of Taxol supports functional recovery of rats after spinal cord injury, although it is not clear whether these effects were the result of improved axonal regeneration or caused by other mechanisms.35 Nevertheless, very recently published results from both, optic nerve and spinal cord injury models lend encouragement to the possibility that microtubule-stabilizing compounds such as Taxol may be suitable adjuvant drugs for the treatment of CNS injuries particularly when combined with interventions stimulating the intrinsic regenerative state of neurons.

References

  • 1.Yiu G, He Z. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:617–627. doi: 10.1038/nrn1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:146–156. doi: 10.1038/nrn1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mukhopadhyay G, Doherty P, Walsh FS, Crocker PR, Filbin MT. A novel role for myelin-associated glycoprotein as an inhibitor of axonal regeneration. Neuron. 1994;13:757–767. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.GrandPré T, Nakamura F, Vartanian T, Strittmatter SM. Identification of the Nogo inhibitor of axon regeneration as a Reticulon protein. Nature. 2000;403:439–444. doi: 10.1038/35000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Prinjha R, Moore SE, Vinson M, Blake S, Morrow R, Christie G, et al. Inhibitor of neurite outgrowth in humans. Nature. 2000;403:383–384. doi: 10.1038/35000287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang KC, Koprivica V, Kim JA, Sivasankaran R, Guo Y, Neve RL, et al. Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a Nogo receptor ligand that inhibits neurite outgrowth. Nature. 2002;417:941–944. doi: 10.1038/nature00867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atwal JK, Pinkston-Gosse J, Syken J, Stawicki S, Wu Y, Shatz C, et al. PirB is a functional receptor for myelin inhibitors of axonal regeneration. Science. 2008;322:967–970. doi: 10.1126/science.1161151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fischer D, Petkova V, Thanos S, Benowitz LI. Switching mature retinal ganglion cells to a robust growth state in vivo: gene expression and synergy with RhoA inactivation. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8726–8740. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2774-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fischer D, He Z, Benowitz LI. Counteracting the Nogo receptor enhances optic nerve regeneration if retinal ganglion cells are in an active growth state. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1646–1651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5119-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leaver SG, Cui Q, Plant GW, Arulpragasam A, Hisheh S, Verhaagen J, et al. AAV-mediated expression of CNTF promotes long-term survival and regeneration of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. Gene Ther. 2006;13:1328–1341. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steinmetz MP, Horn KP, Tom VJ, Miller JH, Busch SA, Nair D, et al. Chronic enhancement of the intrinsic growth capacity of sensory neurons combined with the degradation of inhibitory proteoglycans allows functional regeneration of sensory axons through the dorsal root entry zone in the mammalian spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8066–8076. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2111-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dent EW, Kalil K. Axon branching requires interactions between dynamic microtubules and actin filaments. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9757–9769. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09757.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanaka E, Ho T, Kirschner MW. The role of microtubule dynamics in growth cone motility and axonal growth. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:139–155. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sengottuvel V, Leibinger M, Pfreimer M, Andreadaki A, Fischer D. Taxol facilitates axon regeneration in the mature CNS. J Neurosci. 2011;31:2688–2699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4885-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Derry WB, Wilson L, Jordan MA. Substoichiometric binding of taxol suppresses microtubule dynamics. Biochemistry. 1995;34:2203–2211. doi: 10.1021/bi00007a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Derry WB, Wilson L, Khan IA, Luduena RF, Jordan MA. Taxol differentially modulates the dynamics of microtubules assembled from unfractionated and purified beta-tubulin isotypes. Biochemistry. 1997;36:3554–3562. doi: 10.1021/bi962724m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Müller A, Hauk TG, Leibinger M, Marienfeld R, Fischer D. Exogenous CNTF stimulates axon regeneration of retinal ganglion cells partially via endogenous CNTF. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009;41:233–246. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Park K, Luo JM, Hisheh S, Harvey AR, Cui Q. Cellular mechanisms associated with spontaneous and ciliary neurotrophic factor-cAMP-induced survival and axonal regeneration of adult retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10806–10815. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3532-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geraldo S, Gordon-Weeks PR. Cytoskeletal dynamics in growth-cone steering. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:3595–3604. doi: 10.1242/jcs.042309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fischer D, Pavlidis M, Thanos S. Cataractogenic lens injury prevents traumatic ganglion cell death and promotes axonal regeneration both in vivo and in culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3943–3954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hauk TG, Leibinger M, Müller A, Andreadaki A, Knippschild U, Fischer D. Intravitreal application of the Toll-like receptor 2 agonist Pam3Cys stimulates axon regeneration in the mature optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;51:459–464. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hauk TG, Müller A, Lee J, Schwendener R, Fischer D. Neuroprotective and axon growth promoting effects of intraocular inflammation do not depend on oncomodulin or the presence of large numbers of activated macrophages. Exp Neurol. 2008;209:469–482. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Leon S, Yin Y, Nguyen J, Irwin N, Benowitz LI. Lens injury stimulates axon regeneration in the mature rat optic nerve. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4615–4626. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04615.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lorber B, Berry M, Logan A. Lens injury stimulates adult mouse retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration via both macrophage- and lens-derived factors. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:2029–2034. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leibinger M, Müller A, Andreadaki A, Hauk TG, Kirsch M, Fischer D. Neuroprotective and axon growth-promoting effects following inflammatory stimulation on mature retinal ganglion cells in mice depend on ciliary neurotrophic factor and leukemia inhibitory factor. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14334–14341. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2770-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muller A, Hauk TG, Fischer D. Astrocyte-derived CNTF switches mature RGCs to a regenerative state following inflammatory stimulation. Brain. 2007;130:3308–3320. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hellal F, Hurtado A, Ruschel J, Flynn KC, Laskowski CJ, Umlauf M, et al. Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science. 2011;331:928–931. doi: 10.1126/science.1201148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Busch SA, Horn KP, Cuascut FX, Hawthorne AL, Bai L, Miller RH, et al. Adult NG2+ cells are permissive to neurite outgrowth and stabilize sensory axons during macrophage-induced axonal dieback after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2010;30:255–265. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3705-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Busch SA, Horn KP, Silver DJ, Silver J. Overcoming macrophage-mediated axonal dieback following CNS injury. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9967–9976. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1151-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maranhão RC, Tavares ER, Padoveze AF, Valduga CJ, Rodrigues DG, Pereira MD. Paclitaxel associated with cholesterol-rich nanoemulsions promotes atherosclerosis regression in the rabbit. Atherosclerosis. 2008;197:959–966. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wiskirchen J, Schöber W, Schart N, Kehlbach R, Wersebe A, Tepe G, et al. The effects of paclitaxel on the three phases of restenosis: smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration and matrix formation: an in vitro study. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:565–571. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000133815.22434.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schachtrup C, Ryu JK, Helmrick MJ, Vagena E, Galanakis DK, Degen JL, et al. Fibrinogen triggers astrocyte scar formation by promoting the availability of active TGFbeta after vascular damage. J Neurosci. 2010;30:5843–5854. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0137-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y, Moges H, Bharucha Y, Symes A. Smad3 null mice display more rapid wound closure and reduced scar formation after a stab wound to the cerebral cortex. Exp Neurol. 2007;203:168–184. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dong C, Li Z, Alvarez R, Jr, Feng XH, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. Microtubule binding to Smads may regulate TGF beta activity. Mol Cell. 2000;5:27–34. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80400-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Perez-Espejo MA, Haghighi SS, Adelstein EH, Madsen R. The effects of taxol, methylprednisolone and 4-aminopyridine in compressive spinal cord injury: a qualitative experimental study. Surg Neurol. 1996;46:350–357. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00200-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Communicative & Integrative Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES